Redistribution of BGP with EIGRP

Similar Questions

• DMVPN BGP and EIGRP

  I am in the initial phase of research DMVPN.  We currently have an MPLS network running BGP.  Each site has Internet at home as well as a VPN site-to-site is built on the router and talks to an ASA when the SPLM fails.

  I want to implement DMVPN to do away with the site to site VPN and ASA.  I'm going to run EIGRP on routers to connect DMVPN.  Are there any good whitepapers on BGP as the main path and by EIGRP on the DMVPN as a backup?  Or no focus on a general config?

  Thank you

  It's really the main issue.

  With your configuration DMVPN roads will be internal EIGRP of an advertisement of 90, so your default DC prefer DMVPN on MPLS, which is exactly what you don't want.

  There are several ways around this as summarizing through DMPVN, redistribution connected on the sites of the branch in EIGRP so roads DMVPN are external as well and then changing measures etc.

  The other alternative I have ever done so it's for your information is really Cisco have what is called a solution IWAN where DMVPN is performed everywhere that is, even through the MPLS network.

  That would solve your problem of external routes internal EIGRP but IWAN vs is much more than just that, even if you do not need necessarily to implement the entire solution at a time.

  I just thought that it should be mentioned, and if you want more information on this I can direct you to the design guide.

  Jon

• By default static route with recevied BGP default route

  Hi guys;

  I have a problem and I don't know how to find or solve it.

  My chart is attached, please check everything first.

  Secondly, I have a multihomed BGP with two Internet service providers, I received two ISPS via BGP default route.

  Now, I have two types of IP addresses as follows:

  1 - my own prifixes, who has recorded with my ACE

  2 - iPs purchased ISP2.

  I have two networks, the first will contain my own prefixes and second will contain my prifixes ISP2. so I have to go on the internet, static route by default to the ISP2 need and that's fine, now the problem that carry the second defect I received two ISPS in routing however my table if I show ip bgp I see that I received it, but because of favorite and distancing China he disappear the default road statistics.

  so now a network is already online and the second network that contain my own IPs is out of service, of course this second network I need to routed to my isps1 via bgp and when isps1 down, go through ISP2 and I do using weight and as path prefix.

  Thank you

  Hi Nathan,

  With ACB option, you config-route map is your own prefix and set its next hop ISP 1 and 2 PSI when ISP 1 IP is not accessible. Apply the road map to interface with Network1. ACB is processed before routing.

  With option VRF, put the Network1 interface and isps1 VRF1, so it will have separate routing table. Under the vrf1 you static default config with higher AD and the next hop pointing to ISP2 in the global routing table. This will be used when you lose by default isps1. Because separate ridges VRF table routing, so netwoek1 will use the default route in vrf1 to isps1 as primary, the Network2 use ISP2.

  HTH,
  Lei Tian

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• BGP

  Hi all

  We have a customer who has formed the BGP relationship with one of the neighbor ISP. The way they put in place is, they are just nearby and they advertise only their subnet but do not receive all of the ISP.

  They just use static to point to ISP route.

  Can someone please advise, why it is necessary to do so? (No advantage)

  They can't just point to ISP using a static route without having to buy BGP AS? (If say save money)

  Can they just get the ISP routing table?

  I know they are different thing to consider.

  (1) router can handle the load?

  (2) have double links?

  But apart from this no specific advantage? Please advice.

  Thank you

  Hello

  Customer must have session BGP with ISP to announce its internal network and the networks of his client to the outside world. Otherwise to buy ip pool of the psi and PSI would BGP origination and the advertising of this ip pool. Problem is in this case, when the customer changes service provider, it would need to re - allocate ip addresses in its network given by new ISP. It's not easy and it's pain.

  For outbound traffic, if the customer is having a single link upstream to the ISP-1, no point of taking the route table full, instead it may have the default route to push all traffic to ISP - 1. Now this default route will be charged via BGP static route or service provider. Customer must be redistribute static PGI to make it available to the other routers on the network.

  -Pls remember messages useful rate.

  Kind regards
  Assani

• Why "bgp bestpath missing-as-worst med" command does not produce the desired result?

  Can dear all, someone tell me why "bgp bestpath missing-as-worst med" command does not produce the desired result?
  And I use GNS3 to this practice, the IOS Version: 12.4 (3)
  TKS...

  Back to the beginning:
  192.168.23.0/24 192.168.12.0/24
  RA(F0/0)-(f0/0) RB (s2/0) - RC (s2/0)
  [AS1]                    [AS2]                    [AS3]

  Configuration:
  * RA *:
  A #do sh run (config - router). b r b
  router bgp 1
  no synchronization
  The log-neighbor BGP-changes
  1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
  192.168.12.2 neighbor remote-2
  setmed map of nearby route 192.168.12.2 out
  No Auto-resume

  IP route 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0

  setmed allowed 10 route map
  the metric value 20

  * RB *:
  B (config - router) #do sh run | b r b
  router bgp 2
  no synchronization
  BGP always-compare-med
  The log-neighbor BGP-changes
  BGP bestpath missing-as-worst med
  neighbor 192.168.12.1 distance-1
  neighbour 192.168.23.3 distance-3
  No Auto-resume

  * RC *:
  C (config - router) #do sh run | b r b
  router bgp 3
  no synchronization
  The log-neighbor BGP-changes
  1.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
  neighbour 192.168.23.2 distance-2
  No Auto-resume

  IP route 1.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0

  But when I checked out table RB bgp, as below:

  B (config - router) #do sh ip bgp
  BGP table version is 2, local router ID is 192.168.23.2
  Status codes: deleted, cushioning d s, history of h, * valid, > best, i - internal.
  r SIDE-failure, stale S
  Source codes: i - IGP, e - EGP,? -incomplete
  Network Next Hop path metrics LocPrf weight
  * > 1.1.1.0/24 192.168.23.3 0 0 3 I
  *                          192.168.12.1            20                         0  1 i

  The prefix is assigned a MED of 0, but also the best path value when I use "bgp bestpath missing-as-worst med" in how to configure bgp... :-(

  Please take a look at the discussion on the configuration of drugs to an eBGP neighbor:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/343397?TSTART=0

  Note that BGP MED is set to 0 even if the injected BGP route from a connected route.

  The first time I came across this problem sending MED was there in a picture of 5-6 years service provider. Routes were injected into BGP with the command 'network', has been validated by OSPF routes or static to null0. Involuntary consignment of drugs was mess with load balancing between 2 links of our inbound traffic from the same upstream service provider.

  Also note that if a route is learned via iBGP, border router removes MED before the road to advertising for an eBGP peers (i.e. the above comments apply a when a route is injected locally into the border and then router BGP sent to an eBGP peer).

  I don't know what the cause of the problem that you said in your last post. It delivers last for a long time or that it does not change after a while?

  p.s. Sorry, I edited post because I said "iBGP" instead of "eBGP" at some point.

• EIGRP: Package ourselves ignored

  I did a debug eigrp neighbors, and I got the message "EIGRP: package ourselves ignored" every 5 seconds. I found that I could get rid of it through the passive loopback interface. So is this just cosmetic, or is it considered good practice to make passive loopback interfaces? What are the advantages and disadvantages?

  Kevin Dorrell

  Luxembourg

  Kevin

  I see only one single factor that could be a con to passive looping with EIGRP. If you make the passive interface it does not appear when you show ip eigrp interface. (and if it's really a con will depend on your point of view) I see several factors pro. If the closure is not passive, EIGRP will build and try to send (or perhaps based on your results I should say sends) a Hello packet to itself and are preparing to attempt to build a contiguity. Of course the adjacency will never do. So if you're passive looping you will gain a number of overhead.

  If you include a network for looping statement, but liabilities of closure it is always announced that according to me is the main reason to enroll him in EIGRP. If we get the main advantage and can save some overhead so I guess maybe it's bordered on being a best practice. (Although I must admit that most of the configs I do not have passive looping. "So I do not believe very strongly in this subject being recommended.)

  HTH

  Rick

• Change of advertising for the BGP subnet

  Probably a simple question, but my skills BGP are almost nothing... apologies in advance.

  Scenario:

  CompanyABC has a 22 1.1.0.0 subnet.  The 22 full announced out of CorpOffice1 to isps1.  There is a roadmap set up that uses a prefix list to announce the outgoing subnets.  Below is an example config:

  BGP:

  router bgp 35555

  changes of the next newspaper

  Remote 2.2.2.2 a neighbor - like 5555

  2.2.2.2 neighbor activate

  neighbor 2.2.2.2 soft-reconfiguration inbound
  2.2.2.2 a neighbor ISP1_5555_out map out route

  Map of the route:

  ISP1_5555_out allowed 10 route map
  match ip address prefix-list ISP1_Primary

  List of prefixes:

  IP-list of prefixes ISP1_Primary seq 10 permit 1.1.0.0/22

  Lets say that CompanyABC also has another office which is also served by isps1.  They want to divide the 22 subnet so that the first 3 subnets (1.1.0.0,1.1.1.0 and 1.1.2.0) are always announced to CorpOffice1, but they want to configure BGP with isps1 to CorpOffice2 and announce only the 1.1.3.0 subnet from there.

  Questions:

  The configuration change is not as simple as changing the prefix-list to the CorpOffice1 to announce the 3 24 subnets and configure a BGP configuration similar to CorpOffice2, but only the 1 24 subnet advertising?

  Changing the configuration to CorpOffice1 would require coordination with isps1 to make this change?

  (Should of course coordinate with isps1 configure BGP CorpOffice2 to announce the second subnet.)

  What is time of reconfiguration CorpOffice1 stop/impact?

  Thanks in advance, guys.

  Yes you can do as you said. You can use following the procedure-

  -Come three/24 prefixes of CorpOffice1.

  -Change the prefix-list out route-map to allow three 24 prefixes.

  -Ask the ISP to accept these prefixes. ISP must have applied inbound route-map to have control on the prefixes that you are advertising. It may be in a format like "prefix ip allowed list of 24 1.1.0.0/22" or may be just allowed 22 prefix. Therefore, confirmation with the ISP and this route-map change may be required.

  -Once the ISP confirms that they are open/24 prefixes and advertising to the internet, you can stop advertising 22 prefix. Confirm if 24 prefixes are announced to internet or not, you can connect to any global server and look for your bgp route prefixes.

  -Also, as soon as you stop the advertising/22 prefix, check if you are able to reach internet or not. If this is not the case, take a source based traceroute results and then start advertising again 22 prefix and troubleshoot it ISP below.

  -Note pls useful messages-

  Kind regards

  Assani

• Remove the static route by default

  Hello

  I have a switch L3 which has a static default route pointing to a FW that is connected to a circuit of the Internet. The same L3 switch made EIGRP routers on our MPLS network. If this default static route disappears EIGRP will inject a default route, and users will receive their Internet traffic through the MPLS cloud as a backup.

  My question is how to remove this static road by default with a mechanism that is unique on the Internet circuit. I can't count on line protocol because it almost never goes down. I can't rely on Internet ping IP SLA addresses because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop of the SLA of intellectual property.

  I wish I could do BGP with the Internet provider but this circuit is in a country where it would be difficult.

  Any ideas on how to remove this default static route based on something that is unique to this tour of the Internet.

  Thank you

  P.

  "I can't rely on Internet addresses ping IP SLA because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop IP SLA."

  To remedy this situation, you must add a route with the 'permanent' switch at the end of any IP you track on your IPSLA... In this way, if this interface is down, your ping IPSLA would stop and IPSLA would be the move and change your default route.

  Example:

  Route IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.2 Permanent

  where 1.1.1.1 is the IP address, you are followed and 2.2.2.2 is your 'usual' default gateway

• Removing static route get % corresponding to any error no route to remove

  I'm trying to remove a static route, I added:

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  R2 #show ip route
  Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP
  D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone
  N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2
  E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2
  i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2
  -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user
  o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

  Gateway of last resort is not set

  172.168.0.0/29 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  S 172.168.0.0 [1/0] via 192.168.2.2
  C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
  192.168.2.0/30 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 192.168.2.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
  R2 #conf t
  Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
  R2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2
  % Corresponding to any no route to remove
  R2 (config) #r2 #show ip route

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  I was training establishment of a static routing on three routers r2 (2600xm) connected to r1 (2600xm) via maps module T1 on the serial ports. connected to r1 is a router 2500 old called PC.

  I removed the static routes off r2 and PC but when I get to r2 I connect to 2500 another console cable that I use to access a server I get the above error.  all IP addresses are just generic subnets that I created to play with static routing.   I can't remove someone has any ideas?

  you use the subnet mask different than the one you used. According to the route table entry mask is 29

  Try this,

  1] r2 (config) #no ip route 172.168.0.0 255.255.255.248 192.168.2.2

  or 2] another easy method would be to check the working config and copy stick with 'no' at the beginning.

  See the race | include the ip route

  Copy the static route statement and paste this what with 'no' in the global configuration and check the routing table.

• VRF Installationavecuneracine road inaccessible NH

  Hello

  I just start dabling in the VRF to GNS3 so forgive me if this is a silly question. My understanding is that roads be installed in the SIDES if the next hop address is inaccessible. I announced a single route in the VRF (from BGP) and installed the road even if the VRF ignores the next hop.

  #show ip route vrf Border1 test

  Routing table: test
  Code: L - local, C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP
  D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone
  N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2
  E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2
  i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2
  -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user
  o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static, H - PNDH, l - LISP
  + - replicated road, % - next hop override

  Gateway of last resort is not set

  10.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 10.99.99.1 is directly connected, Loopback9
  B 200.1.1.0/24 [20: 20] via 10.35.1.1, 00:40:12, GigabitEthernet3/0

  #show ip route vrf Border1 test 10.35.1.1

  Routing table: test
  Subnet in the table %

  test definition VRF
  RD 100: 100
  !
  ipv4 address family
  import the unicast ipv4 IMPORT OF GLOBAL - map
  output-address-family

  interface Loopback9
  VRF forwarding test
  10.99.99.1 IP 255.255.255.255

  IP-list of prefixes LEAK VRF seq 5 permit 26 200.1.1.0/24

  IMPORT OF GLOBAL-enabled 10 route map
  address for correspondence prefix LEAK VRF ip-list

  I have a really basic VRF configuration and made no big thing with her. Any ideas on how the VRF can install this road when there isn't a road to the next hop?

  Hello cwhite0013,

  It is true that BGP should not install a route if it has an entry for the next break in the Routing Table.

  Looking at your configuration, I can see the router "flows" in the VRF 'test', the 200.1.1.0/24 road which is originally in the global Routing Table.

  In this case, the router must send traffic to a next break in the global Routing Table. This is the reason for which the router is looking for the jump next 10.35.1.1 not in the VRF 'test', but in the global Routing Table where there should be an entry for it.

  I hope this helps.

• Router (IPSec)-> INTERNET-> Router (IPsec) where to put the TUNNEL IP POOL?

  Hello

  I'm still learning the VPN (IPsec), I was able to create a tunnel between my PC and my router, but now I want to connect two routers:

  F0/1=192.168.0.1 ROUTER A-> INTERNET-> ROUTER B F0/1=192.168.10.1

  Both routers receive an IP address from my ISP, I can't do a ping to a site at the other site, I mean, I am able to PING ROUTER A from ROUTER B with the ISP addresses and otherwise.

  Two ROUTERS have the same configuration, except for the IP addresses and the ACL, they are opposite.

  I think I know what I did wrong, but I don't know how to solve: the TUNNEL need also an IP from a POOL where should I put up, the ROUTER A or ROUTER B?

  ROUTER

  version 12.4

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  router host name

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  No aaa new-model

  IP cef

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key cisco address 81.83.201.BB

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des RIGHT

  !

  router_A_to_router_B 1000 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  set of peer 81.83.201.BB

  transformation-RIGHT game

  match address 101

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  DHCP IP address

  automatic speed

  full-duplex

  router_A_to_router_B card crypto

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  the IP 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0

  automatic speed

  full-duplex

  !

  !

  no ip address of the http server

  no ip http secure server

  !

  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  !

  control plan

  !

  Line con 0

  Speed 115200

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  !

  !

  end

  ROUTER B

  version 12.4

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  router host name

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  No aaa new-model

  IP cef

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key cisco address 81.83.201.AA

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des RIGHT

  !

  router_B_to_router_A 1000 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  set of peer 81.83.201.AA

  transformation-RIGHT game

  match address 101

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  DHCP IP address

  automatic speed

  full-duplex

  router_B_to_router_A card crypto

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  automatic speed

  full-duplex

  !

  !

  no ip address of the http server

  no ip http secure server

  !

  access-list 101 permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  !

  control plan

  !

  Line con 0

  Speed 115200

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  !

  !

  end

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  !

  Best regards

  Didier

  Didier, there are a number of things missing in your config file to make it work, what I can say fa0/1 is inside and the fa0/0 are outdoors. There is no NAT translation to activate the computers inside the network, allowing access to the Internet. You will also need to exclude the EIGRP NAT roads in order to reach the remote network. Each router must have a default gateway to the Internet, this should be done with the following command:

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 fa0/0 dhcp

  This will use the default gateway of the DHCP server that assigns IP address on fa0/0. Once that each router has a path to another and the tunnel connects EIGRP will handle the rest given the information to the router 90, this is the spectacle of one of my spoke routers route:

  NTR-2620XM #show ip route
  Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP
  D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone
  N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2
  E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2
  i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2
  -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user
  o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

  Gateway of last resort is to network 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  65.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 65.14.24.190 is directly connected, Dialer0
  172.16.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  D EX 172.16.50.31 [170/3074560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:58, Tunnel0
  172.19.0.0/24 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 172.19.8.0 is directly connected, Tunnel0
  10.0.0.0/8 is variably divided into subnets, subnets 14, 6 masks
  D EX 10.13.13.8/29 [170/2818560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:58, Tunnel0
  D EX 10.11.7.0/28 [170/2818560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:58, Tunnel0
  D 10.13.13.0/29 [90/2818560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:58, Tunnel0
  C 10.19.9.0/27 is directly connected, Vlan200
  C 10.19.8.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan100
  C 10.19.10.0/28 is directly connected, Vlan900
  D EX 10.20.7.0/24 [170/2818560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:58, Tunnel0
  D [90/3097600] 10.22.7.0/24 through 172.19.8.1, 17:34:52, Tunnel0
  D 10.37.4.0/24 [90/3074560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:59, Tunnel0
  D 10.15.50.0/24 [90/3074560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:59, Tunnel0
  D EX 10.24.40.0/24 [170/2818560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:59, Tunnel0
  D 10.12.85.0/24 [90/3074560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:59, Tunnel0
  C 10.19.9.192/26 is directly connected, Vlan500
  D EX 10.244.0.0/22 [170/2818560] via 172.19.8.1, 20:04:59, Tunnel0
  74.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
  C 74.23.201.24 is directly connected, Dialer0
  S * 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Dialer0

  All designated routes D are dynamic routes drawn other routers on the DMVPN EIGRP. It will propagate the routing table and they point to the appropriate star. If you follow the example that I gave you, you will have a functional DMVPN.

  See you soon,.

  Sam

• Error code 0x80070005 on Windows 7

  * Original title: 0x80070005

  Hello, I get an error 0 x 80070005.  Went through the process, and it came on my Notepad. Can anyone help!

  I am running Windows 7

  This software is provided ' as what "and the use of the software is at your own risk. Sysinternals disclaims any warranty, express, implied or statutory, including, without limitation, the implied warranties of merchantable quality, fitness for a particular purpose or of non-violation of third party rights. Sysinternals does not guarantee that the software is free of defects.

  You are authorized to use the software published by Sysinternals at home or at work without having to pay a commercial fee as much as you have downloaded the software yourself directly from Sysinternals, and:

  * Use the software on the computers of which you are the primary user; or
  * Use the software on computers for which there is no primary user
  (e.g. servers, including Terminal servers) and you are full time
  employee of the owner of the computer company. or
  * Use the software on computers in your home

  A commercial license is required to use the software in any way not described above, including for example:

  Redistribution of the software in any way, including by the computer
  media, a file server, an email attachment, etc.
  Integration of software or link to another program, including internal applications, scripts, batch files, etc.
  * The use of the software for technical support on client computers

  Sales of commercial Sysinternals product development licenses and ensure that this site continues to offer useful and up-to-date tools. Established software publishers redistribute these utilities and incorporate the code into their products, because it offers the opportunity to save significant development time. The price of Sysinternals commercial licenses are depending on the complexity of the code under license and its role in the application target. If you are interested in the Sysinternals tools license or source code for redistribution or inclusion with or as part of a software product, please contact * address email is removed from the privacy *.

  Sysinternals, which provides many popular administration Windows and diagnostic utilities, part of Microsoft.  See https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396

  The Notepad window you see looks like an old Sysinternals CLUF (end-user license agreement).

  You need to explain this 'process' you "went through in order to get any help... and help with the Sysinternals utilities," you are the best place to look is in the forum Systinternals utility you use--> http://forum.sysinternals.com/

• AIDC vs COPP

  We have a 7600 router and 7600 has 2 links with BGP.

  We have a direction of ACL interface in to block a part of traffic, for example BGP traffic.

  We also have a COPP-BGP with an ACL also, with fewer blocks.

  This is who will be checked first class, AIDC or COPP.
  After some time, the reading and research, I found a document:

  http://www.Cisco.com/Web/about/security/intelligence/coppwp_gs.html

  It shows a picture with AIDC before COPP, so my first thought seems to be false (that COPP will be first and AIDC would be checked after).

  What is the order? AIDC--> COPP and COPP--> AIDC

  If AIDC is initially the COPP ACL can be less retrictive.

  Anyone know what is the correct order?

  thnks

  As the packet enters the device, "therefore" the interface the AIDC will be put into action.

  Once the package is within the unit, it can be punted to the CPU, and this is where CoPP is put into action.

  In the basic architecture as the 7600 material, not all packets are punted to the CPU, so you will have a more granular protection with AIDC.

  Kind regards

• nVidia GTX 650 ti only supports DirectX 10, why?

  Hi I'm new here, yesterday, I bought a ti (used) Nvidia GTX 650 graphics card.
  But this card does not support directx 11. I know that you do not...

  It's the image...

  

  I installed the 331 WHQL driver and also tried the last 336. But none helped me.
  Please tell me whats wrong with my graphics card!
  Please...
  I can solve this problem?

  I even tried on another PC with Windows 7 64 bit on it, but no.

  Is it a windows fault, not alone directx 11 app works for me. Even though I installed directx redistribution that comes with 4 fields of battle.

  I guess that the card is a fake. All the 400 series Nvidia cards on support DX11.

  (They change the information on the cards BIOS to display a different model name/number).

  Other specifications are not correct for a GTX650ti.

  http://www.GeForce.com/hardware/desktop-GPUs/GeForce-GTX-650ti/specifications

  The GTS 250 is the closest I can find. It has also 128 cores Cuda (vs 768 on the GTX650ti).

  The number of Cuda cores is the main indicator to determine what gpu card.

  The GTS 250 is a low end card, not suitable for BF4, although she did not support DX11, but the rest

  the specifications of your card are even lower than those in the link below (with the exception of the memory bus speed

  (@ 256 bit). The other odd part is the 2 GB of VRAM. A GTX 250 should be not more than 1 GB.

  It may be an OEM version (built by a mfg like HP or DELL computer). They are often low clocked variations of different models.

  http://www.GeForce.com/hardware/desktop-GPUs/GeForce-GTS250/specifications

  Note that even a real GTX650ti will not run BF4 with keen @ 1920 x 1080.

• How to determine the amount of adds to add to my itinerary map

  I currently have two different ISP and I use BGP for redundancy. I see about 50% more traffic coming inbound on one ISP on the other. So I want to do is precede my ACE using a road map to one of the ISP's to create a more equitable balance of incoming traffic. I understand that this is not an accurate method of inbound load balancing and to my knowledge it is not an exact science to the load balancing incoming BGP with two ISP using different but I would try to make the incoming traffic more equitable between the two Internet service providers.

  So my question is. Is there a way to determine how much makes precede I would add to the roadmap before implementing this change or simply add a prefix and note the change and then add traffic structure adds as a result?

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  K.

  I don't think that there is a good way to determine how many prefaces for use before making any changes. You should add one, check on the distribution of traffic to see the effect and then add another until you get the approximate balance you want.

  HTH

  Rick