Registry XSD - ORA-01792: maximum number of columns in a table or view is 1000

Similar Questions

• Maximum number of columns in model RTF Pivot

  HI -.

  For the model previously mentioned here matrix report problem with template RTF - text columns

  I want to restrict the maximum number of columns per page, and the table should be repeated for the rest of the columns in another page.

  For example, if there are 5 columns must be returned, I want the first 3 columns in the first page and the 2 others in a second page (with the hole repeating frame).

  It's for keeping data legible printing of the pdf format, otherwise the data seems damaged and unreadable.

  Y at - it ideas to achieve this requirement?

  Best regards

  Rupture of the horizontal column works fine in the attached version of the RTF model.

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (150) exceeded

  Hello

  I'm getting ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (150) exceeded. I can not connect as sys. I killed all the oracle user processes but could not connect. Pls advice me on this.

  Rgds,

  AthuruMithuru.

  Hello

  try to connect with a - prelim

  prelim sqlplus / as sysdba

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded

  All respected DBAs,

  Today I faced an issue. I found below statement alertlog file and when I tried to connect to the base of this error came on the command line.

  "ORA-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded 150.

  Then I restarted my Oracle Service, connected to the database and questioned

  select * from v$ resource_limit and found this result.

  Process

  CURRENT_UTILIZATION = 52

  MAX_UTILIZATION = 61

  INITIAL_ALLOCATION = 150

  LIMIT_VALUE = 150

  Sessions

  CURRENT_UTILIZATION = 53

  MAX_UTILIZATION = 60

  INITIAL_ALLOCATION = 248

  LIMIT_VALUE = 248

  If my process is exceeded then why MAX_UTILIZATION = 61 only? Please, help me to understand this.

  This view is dynamic (it will reset on reboot) and restart you the database.

  So you can only say that after the restart of the database the number of processes is already 61.

  -------------

  Sybrand Bakker

  Senior Oracle DBA

• error ora-00036 maximum number of levels of sql recursive (50) exceeded

  I have a trigger of the declaration on the LEVELS table, I want to update COMPONENTS field when another field is changed in TIERS, in order to avoid the calculations, I used to ch line shutter COMPONENTS to complete a package, but I get this error ora-00036 maximum number of recursive sql exceeded (50)

  It's my trigger:

  create or replace trigger DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS

    after update on tiers 

   

    I INT ;

   

    FOR I IN (PKG_TIERS. TAB. FIRST)... (PKG_TIERS. TAB. Last) LOOP

  UPDATE to levels

  PUT REFERENCE_EXTERNE = "YYYY"

  WHERE LEVELS = PKG_TIERS. TAB (I). I_TIERS;

    END LOOP;

  end DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS;

  
  

  This is ma for each trigger line:

  create or replace trigger DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS_E

  after Update FOR CODE_TYPE_TIERS on LEVELS

    for each row

  V_CPT INTEGER ;

    IF : NEW. CODE_TYPE_TIERS IS NOT NULL THEN

  IF PKG_TIERS. TAB. LAST IS NULL THEN

  PKG_TIERS. TAB(1). I_TIERS: =: NEW. BLEACHERS;

  PKG_TIERS. TAB(1). CODE_TYPE_TIERS: =: NEW. CODE_TYPE_TIERS;

     ELSE

  V_CPT: = PKG_TIERS. TAB. LAST + 1;

     END IF;

    END IF;

  end DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS_E;

  Clearly, you have past of recursion.  After updating the table of LEVELS, then a statement trigger level (after update) as the fires that updates the table LEVELS... which will cause then itself to once again fire... which will cause himself to fire once again... which will cause itself to the light again... etc etc.

  If it is a business logic that should be implemented, so you don't want to include it as a trigger, you want to just have a code in a package that updates the table once.

  If it were me, I would scrap two triggers in this case.  Have a trigger is fired for each row updated (in SQL) which has then cross to the PL/SQL package for details of this update line, means you to act so the context switching between SQL and PL/SQL for each update line, which will affect the performance of the updates.

  Explain what you're actually trying to do (business logic), with a few examples and data tables and we might be able to propose a better approach, which is not abusing triggers in this way.

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes 2000 exceeded

  Hi all

  In our dataguard environment, even if the number of database backup process was 2000 (wide enough), we get the error as below.

  Treat m000 presentation failed with error = 20

  M001 submission process failed with error = 20

  Treat m002 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m003 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m004 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m003 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m002 presentation failed with error = 20

  M001 submission process failed with error = 20

  Treat m000 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m005 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m000 presentation failed with error = 20

  M001 submission process failed with error = 20

  ORA-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded 2000.

  Errors ORA-20 will not be written to the log of alert for the next minute. Please see the trace files to see all the errors ORA-20.

  Currently, the listener is down and there is no log shipping/apply. After the restart it was working fine. But even now if we check the number of processes, it is now to increase every 10 minutes.

  Initially, the number of processes has been 1000.as we had the same error we has increased by 2000. But still, we are facing this problem.

  Kindly advice on that.

  dbconsole is configured separately for the primary and standby.  You could stop it on the day before.

  Check what is the intention that works on standby mode.  The DBA intend to use it to monitor the database pending?

  Unlike enterprise manager that maintains a centralized repository, database control (dbconsole) maintains the repository in the same database that is monitored.  So it might be tempting * writing * to the database.

  Hemant K Collette

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (1000) exceeded.

  Dear team,

  After interruption of the Application processes have increased and he hit ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (1000) exceeded.

  Now that we have increased the value of 1000 to 1200 process issue is resolved.

  It is this ora-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded 1000, out of this database this query on the view V$ SESSION and V$ PROCESS show different results.

  We know that there is a running application and the connection to the database. The connection to the database is a failure.

  How can I know which user & terminal is spawning these processes database server-side? What is the best way to identify the source/machine customer associated to these processes?

  but only 70 sessions show in v$ and gv$ session? In v$ process 687, used slots show the unknown terminal and program of the unknown, as a zombie process. With this information, I can't find what is the appeal of the database, and burn all my processes.

  Example:

  SQL > Select count (*) from v$ session;

  COUNT (*)

  ----------

  70

  SQL > select count (*) in process of v$.

  COUNT (*)

  ----------

  687

  I want to know the source Client Terminal Server/spawning these processes (LOCAL = NO).

  75B - XYZ] - oracle-> ps - ef | grep XYZ

  Oracle 25934 1 0 Sep 16?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 20220 1 0 09:57:37?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 22968 1 0 Sep 13?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 23436 1 0 Sep 20?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 21448 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 7216 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 10760 1 0 Sep 16?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 8385 1 0 Sep 16?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 22952 1 0 Sep 17?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 10911 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 14401 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 6685 1 0 Sep 19?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 7434 1 0 09:11:44?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 13560 1 0 09:17:57?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 7928 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 3623 1 0 Sep 10?           0:54 ora_qmnc_XYZ

  Oracle 29210 1 0 Sep 13?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 13431 1 0 Sep 17?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 21495 1 0 Sep 16?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 13567 1 0 09:17:58?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 4782 1 0 09:42:40?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 25398 1 0 Sep 16?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 21958 1 0 Sep 19?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Thanks in advance!

  Krish

  V$ PROCESS captures no USERNAME and MACHINE (because the user has not been authenticated on the database server).

  I would look through the listener.log file to identify the remote control (ie. application server) IP addresses.

  You can set the listener.log as an external Table file and interrogate him.  (Listener.log and external table on google search, there are several ways)

  Hemant K Collette

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (150) exceeded after 11.2.0.3.0patch

  Hi gurus,
  
  I'm having this issue of ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (150) exceeded after that I did successfully a 11.2.0.1.0 on Linux 5.4 11.2.0.3.0patch.
  
  I understand that I must increase the process boundary, but I can not even connect as SYS or even ' / '.
  
  I ran ' ps - ef | grep oracle' and killed some process but the same problem.
  
  Any idea?
  
  BJ

  Try this...

  http://tech.e2sn.com/Oracle/troubleshooting/hang/how-to-log-on-even-when-SYSDBA-can-t-do-so

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (200) exceeded

  Hi all
  
  I am not able to connect to my database as a sysdba. It throws the below error: -.
  
  [Home/oracle] Oracle@blrvqorasdb01:ARSUATDB > sqlplus "/ as sysdba".
  
  SQL * more: Production release 11.2.0.1.0 Sat Dec 15 19:21:12 2012
  
  Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle. All rights reserved.
  
  ERROR:
  ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (200) exceeded
  
  In the init.ora file I found that this process oracle parameter is set to 200 I need to increase. The database is running, I see the order form below.
  
  [Home/oracle] Oracle@blrvqorasdb01:ARSUATDB > ps - ef | grep pmon
  Oracle 23268 23119 0 19:25:14 pts/1 0:00 grep pmon
  Oracle 25762 760 0 Dec 14? 08:33 ora_pmon_ARSUATDB
  1556 760 0 26 Oct Oracle? 25: 16 asm_pmon_ + ASM
  
  Please suggest me how I can connect to the database. Other applications connected to the database are facing problems connecting.
  
  Please assisit.
  
  Kind regards
  Aalami

  How is it that you report 200 Oracle sessions, but don't see anywhere near as much at the level of the BONE?

  What clues are there in the alert_SID.log file?
  When was the last time all was OK with the DB?
  What has changed since then?

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (300) exceeded

  Hi all
  
  
  IM get this msg whenver I m trying to connect
  
  ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (300) exceeded
  
  Before the processes to be 150 I've changed for 300 stiill facing the same prob.
  
  IM using it on win 7 professional 64 bit and oracle worm 11.2.0.1.0
  
  Thank you

  Hello
  Sysman connections will be from the database control - you use it? otherwise the close - if you are something must be wrong with it as it should not leave loads of session inactive behind - the link between control of the db and the database seems to keep getting lost leaving the session open.

  Kind regards
  Harry

• Maximum number of columns in the generic report

  What is the maximum number of columns in the generic report? I put it to 100, but the data that was displayed are always 60.
  
  Thank you.

  Hello

  It is 100.

  Oops, I thought it was, it seems, this maximum has been removed now - see here
  Maximum number of columns in the generic report

  See you soon

  Ben
  http://www.munkyben.WordPress.com
  Don't forget to mark the answers useful or correct ;)

  Published by: Munky on August 28, 2009 11:16

  Published by: Munky on August 28, 2009 11:17

• IR - CubeQuery - no limit to the maximum number of columns or lines?

  In IR query processing cube, is there a limit to the maximum number of columns or lines? If so, how?
  
  When downloading of the results, are there limits to the maximum. lol the columns or lines as well?
  
  All documentation on its limits?
  
  Please help someone?

  Columns cannot be more than 256 upto Hyperion Interactive Reporting Studio 9.2.

  No, there is no limit to the maximum number of rows. It depends on the memory and available space on your machine.

  Please correct me if I'm wrong.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Manmohan Sharma

• How to check the index, on the number of columns in the table is created

  How to check on the number of columns in the table the index has been created. ??
  
  OR
  
  How check index, on the number of columns in the table that it is been created?

  890306 wrote:
  How to check on the number of columns in the table the index has been created. ??

  >

  OR

  How check index, on the number of columns in the table that it is been created?

  query USER_IND_COLUMNS

  SQL> desc user_ind_columns
   Name                            Null?    Type
   ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
   INDEX_NAME                             VARCHAR2(30)
   TABLE_NAME                             VARCHAR2(30)
   COLUMN_NAME                             VARCHAR2(4000)
   COLUMN_POSITION                        NUMBER
   COLUMN_LENGTH                             NUMBER
   CHAR_LENGTH                             NUMBER
   DESCEND                             VARCHAR2(4)
  

  Handle: 890306
  Status level: Beginner
  Join date: October 8, 2011
  Messages total: 13
  Total Questions: 5 (5 open)

  Why all the question still pending?

  Published by: sb92075 on December 3, 2011 17:21

• Dynamic number of columns in the table

  Hello
  
  I use JDev 10.1.3.3.0 with ADF. I just want to create a table, with a dynamic number of columns in the table. The background is that a user of my webapplication can create and submit a sql query. Now, I have to show him the results. My idea was, I have save the result in a bean managed (ResultTable), which is stored in the session context and map at my table in my page.
  
  If I search the Forum and don't get only one useful thread: {: identifier of the thread = 971888}, but I don't exactly understand. What is the CollectionModel? Do I need this?
  
  I'm trying to report on the following:
  
  ResultTable

  public class ResultTable {
  
      public static final String SESSION_NAME = "ResultTable";
      private ArrayList<ResultColumn> columnList; 
      private CollectionModel collectionModel;
  
      public ResultTable() {
      }
  
      public ArrayList<ResultColumn> getColumnList() {
          return columnList;
      }
  
      public void setColumnList(ArrayList<ResultColumn> columnList) {
          this.columnList = columnList;
      }
  }

  ResultColumn

  public class ResultColumn {
      
      private ArrayList<ResultRow> rowList;
      private String name;
  
      public ResultColumn() {
      }
  
      public ArrayList<ResultRow> getRowList() {
          return rowList;
      }
  
      public void setRowList(ArrayList<ResultRow> rowList) {
          this.rowList = rowList;
      }
  
      public String getName() {
          return name;
      }
  
      public void setName(String name) {
          this.name = name;
      }
  }

  ResultTable

  public class ResultRow {
      
      private String value;
  
      public ResultRow() {
      }
  
      public String getValue() {
          return value;
      }
  
      public void setValue(String value) {
          this.value = value;
      }
  }

  My showResult.jspx

  <af:table emptyText="No items were found"
            value="ResultTable.columnList"
            var="column"
            varStatus="colStatus"
            id="table1">
    <af:forEach items="#{column.rowList}" var="row" varStatus="rowStatus">
      <af:column sortable="false" headerText="#{column.name}" 
                 id="column#{colStatus.index}">
        <af:outputText value="#{row.value}"
                       id="outputText#{rowStatus.index}"/>
      </af:column>
    </af:forEach>
  </af:table>

  The ResultTable was filled with data, but the Board is not filled. So, I think, it must be rejected to the data binding.
  
  I get warnings and errors to run too. But I don't know if they are the result or cause of my problem.

  27.10.2009 10:15:41 oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.renderkit.core.xhtml.TableRenderer renderTableWithoutColumns
  WARNUNG: Table with id: form1:table1 has no visible columns!
  27.10.2009 10:15:41 oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.io.HtmlResponseWriter endElement
  SCHWERWIEGEND: Element End name:span does not match start name:div
  27.10.2009 10:15:41 oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.io.HtmlResponseWriter endElement
  SCHWERWIEGEND: Element End name:span does not match start name:div
  27.10.2009 10:15:41 oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.io.HtmlResponseWriter endElement
  SCHWERWIEGEND: Element End name:form does not match start name:span
  27.10.2009 10:15:41 oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.io.HtmlResponseWriter endElement
  SCHWERWIEGEND: Element End name:body does not match start name:form
  27.10.2009 10:15:41 oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.io.HtmlResponseWriter endElement
  SCHWERWIEGEND: Element End name:html does not match start name:body

  Concerning
  
  Majo

  Hi Mario,.

  Note that your JSPX snippet above has serious shortcomings:
  

• 'ResultTable.rowList' is not an EL expression, but the value attribute of the af: table must refer to an EL expression
  
• Items AF:foreach = "#{row.cellList}"-you don't have to store information about the columns of all rows, more it won't work as af:forEach tag may not see the value of the expression of EL #{line} (or any component EL expression created). " See the tagdoc here: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/jdev/htdocs/partners/addins/exchange/jsf/doc/tagdoc/core/forEach.html
  
• "ID =" Column #{cellStatus.index} "and id =" outputText #{rowStatus.index} "are invalid and that they don't compile even as id attributes cannot contain EL expressions.

  .

  I think to solve your problem, you need three things:
  

• List of columns (for example the list If you need to store only the names of column or list If you need additional information),.
  
• list of lines,
  
• a line can be a map (with the name of the column - cell data mapping; card e.g.) or a list (with columns indexed; for example

• Install HRCS9.0 and PT8.53 with Linux question: the files intiPT853.ora and initHRCS90.ora: exceeded maximum number of DB_FILES

  People,

  Hello. I installed PeopleTools 8.53 with Oracle Linux 5.10 successfully. The PeopleTools everything works fine in the browser at the beginning.

  After that I installed HCM and Solution Campus 9.0 Instance of database named HRCS90 in Linux successfully, PeopleTools 8,53 Database Instance PT853 can not be mounted. The error message is less to:

  SQL > startup
  ORACLE instance started.

  Total System Global Area 538677248 bytes
  Bytes of size 2146024 fixed
  528482584 variable size bytes
  4194304 buffers of data bytes
  Redo buffers 3854336 bytes
  ORA-00059: exceeded maximum number of DB_FILES

  In the home/user/OracleDB_Home/dbs/initPT853.ora file, its parameter db_files has 3 values: small 400, 1021 medium and large 1500. The initial value is 1021 and it works correctly at the beginning.  But after the implementation of another instance of HRCS90, the above error message and instance PT853 is not mounted. I change the value of db_files 1021 to 1500 in the initPT853.ora file and restart the Linux operating system. But get the same error as below:

  SQL > startup
  ORACLE instance started.

  Total System Global Area 538677248 bytes
  Bytes of size 2146024 fixed
  528482584 variable size bytes
  4194304 buffers of data bytes
  Redo buffers 3854336 bytes
  ORA-00059: exceeded maximum number of DB_FILES

  
  In the home/user/OracleDB_Home/dbs/initHRCS90.ora file, its parameter db_files has 3 values: small average 80, 1500 400 and large. I use db_files = 400 and it works properly. I start instance HRCS90 right after the above error message as below:

  SQL > shutdown immediate
  ORA-01507: database not mounted
  ORACLE instance stops.

  SQL > exit
  Disconnected from the database to Oracle 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64 bit Production
  With partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options

  [user@userlinux bin] $ export ORACLE_SID = HRCS90
  [user@userlinux bin] $. / sqlplus / as sysdba

  SQL * more: version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production on sat Nov 23 12:40:02 2013

  Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle.  All rights reserved.

  Connect to an instance is idle.

  SQL > startup
  ORACLE instance started.

  Total System Global Area 538677248 bytes
  Bytes of size 2146024 fixed
  528482584 variable size bytes
  4194304 buffers of data bytes
  Redo buffers 3854336 bytes
  Mounted database.
  Open database.

  SQL > select * from psdbowner;

  DBNAME OWNERID
  --------          --------
  HRCS90 MYNAME

  SQL >

  
  As we see above, the HRCS90 instance work corretly, and PT853 does not start. Parameter DB_FILES the file initPT853.ora has a problem.

  My question is:

  1021 and 1,500 is not enough for a starting PT853 instance, what value should be used for the the file initPT853.ora DB_FILES?

  Thank you.
  
  

  user8860348 wrote:

  People,

  Hello. I installed PeopleTools 8.53 with Oracle Linux 5.10 successfully. The PeopleTools everything works fine in the browser at the beginning.

  After that I installed HCM and Solution Campus 9.0 Instance of database named HRCS90 in Linux successfully, PeopleTools 8,53 Database Instance PT853 can not be mounted...

  I'm sorry, but I do not understand that "Instance" means here.

  > In the file home/user/OracleDB_Home/dbs/initPT853.ora, its parameter db_files has 3 values: small 400, 1021 medium and large 1500.

  Are you do not use a spfile? The file actually contains 3 values? What's the latest? Have you checked the value in the database side "see the db_files parameter?

  > But after set up another instance of HRCS90, the above error message and instance PT853 is not mounted

  Still, I don't know what that means.

  > In the file home/user/OracleDB_Home/dbs/initHRCS90.ora, its parameter db_files has 3 values: small average 80, 1500 400 and large. I use db_files = 400 and it works properly.

  Once again, 3 values? What's the latest? Have you checked the value in the database side "see the db_files parameter?

  > As we see above, the HRCS90 instance work corretly, and PT853 does not start. Parameter DB_FILES the file initPT853.ora has a problem.

  Again, I don't understand what exactly are HRCS90 and PT853. Can not help.

  > 1021 and 1,500 is not enough for a starting PT853 instance, what value should be used for the the file initPT853.ora DB_FILES?

  I am sure, you have not a problem with this setting, 1500 files in the database is fairly large. Recently, I've built a demo, the default 1021 was ok for me. You should have done something wrong somewhere.

  Nicolas.