Representation von Zusatzeigenschaften im report

Similar Questions

• InDesign Update - Administration representation von Tiffs, Bug?

  Hallo,
  seit dem last Update gehoren sich folgendes problem. ICH platziere ein black-and-white Tiff in meine Indesign file. Richtigerweise der nun ist background transparent und das Motiv schwarz. So weit, as well. Wenn ich nun das Motiv einfarbe, wird das Darstellungsoption displaying keiner, bleibt schwarz auf dem Bildschirm, z.B. mir, obwohl die Farbfeldanzeige die Farbe starts right. Wenn ich das Dokument dann als PDF exportiere, sich die Farbe right shows. ICH kann aber doch nicht immer zwischendurch exportieren, nur um zu control, ob die Optik stimmt. Vor dem update war das ja auch nicht necessary. Hat someone similar experiences oder kann mir helfen?

  ACH so, ich nutze Indesign CC im Rahmen der complete Abo-Suite.

  Viele Grüße,
  Thomas

  Hi Thomas,

  Yes, it's a known bug, and the developers are working on a fix.

  See here:

  Re: Images tiff bitmap color shows in black only

  What is helping:
  'View of overprinting' checked permanently.

  In German:
  Do einfach die ein 'Uberdruckenvorschau'.

  Die shows the town.

  Kind regards
  Uwe

• I received a call from someone claiming to be a representative of Microsoft

  I just got a call from someone claiming to be a representative of Microsoft to report that my network downloads could be accompanied by unwanted files without my knowledge.  I know it's a scam, but I played along anyway.  The representative asked me to press the keys Ctrl + key Microsoft Logo at the same time.  Of course I hung up immediately, but I can't find in any of my research, what will make this combination of keys.  Can anyone advise, please.  Thank you.

  Original title: what is CTRL + touch Logo Microsoft do?

  It is a scam. This combination of keys does nothing. Then, my guess is that they will tell you that he was supposed to do something and work on you from here to get info on your machine. Microsoft never does unsolicited phone calls.
   
   
  Is calling, Microsoft, a scam?
  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/protect/wiki/protect_other-protect_scanning/is-that-call-from-Microsoft-a-scam/6718e389-8a00-4E4B-ACA1-d07298ea4c19
   
  
  It's a real call from Microsoft?
  http://www.ComputerActive.co.UK/CA/PC-help/2134917/genuine-Microsoft 
   
  
  Avoid scams to phone for tech support
  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-GB/security/online-privacy/avoid-phone-scams.aspx
   
  
  Do not fall for phony phone technical support
  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/securitytipstalk/archive/2010/03/09/Don-t-fall-for-phony-phone-tech-support.aspx
   
  
  Aggressive, persistent Windows tech support fraudsters continue to track consumers
  http://www.Computerworld.com/s/article/9248122/Aggressive_persistent_Windows_tech_support_scammers_continue_to_stalk_consumers

• PerfMon statement drive dramatic increase in access to Oracle starting times

  Hello
  
  My Oracle 10 g (10.2.0.4) server is hosted on a windows 2003 server.
  The data files are stored on a disk RAID1 on a dedicated partition array: currently 30 free concerts on 180, that shouldn't be a concern unless I am mistaken, because the data files have been created in the form of 10 GB of files with no automatic growth. I add a new data file whenever I need more space for my tables (alerts when 80% used).
  
  Since 2 days I feel a loss of theatrical representation:
  The EM console reports nothing special (no alarm storage-related) outside the need for a more paged memory.
  I have a reorg when segmentation Adviser suggests.
  My the optimizer statistics are calculated by the default scheduled task.
  
  The strange thing I noticed is that as soon as I start the database, there is a huge disk activity increase even if no request at all is submitted to the database.
  PerfMon reports current length of queue of > 1000 disc and disc > 3000 ms access time
  
  CPU is 2% of the activity on the 4-CPU server.
  I have a lot of spare memory (currently 3 used on the 16 GB).
  
  It is a server dev for ETL processes, there is very little simultaneous connections.
  
  Any suggestion is welcome.
  
  AWR report is available here
  http://min.us/mqnXQhd5Z
  
  Published by: user10799939 on March 22, 2012 09:30

  
  Cache Sizes
  ~~~~~~~~~~~                       Begin        End
                               ---------- ----------
                 Buffer Cache:     1,296M     1,296M  Std Block Size:         8K
             Shared Pool Size:       160M       160M      Log Buffer:    14,364K 
  
  Load Profile
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~                            Per Second       Per Transaction
                                     ---------------       ---------------
                    Redo size:            460,955.72 ;         2,477,358.63
                Logical reads:              3,392.16 ;            18,230.80
                Block changes:              6,451.93 ;            34,675.22
               Physical reads:                  2.92 ;                15.67
              Physical writes:                394.52 ;             2,120.28
                   User calls:                  1.69 ;                 9.08
                       Parses:                  3.31 ;                17.81
                  Hard parses:                  0.17 ;                 0.90
                        Sorts:                  1.32 ;                 7.09
                       Logons:                  0.06 ;                 0.31
                     Executes:                  7.01 ;                37.68
                 Transactions:                  0.19 
  
    % Blocks changed per Read:  190.20 ;   Recursive Call %:    96.23
  Rollback per transaction %:    0.30 ;      Rows per Sort:    14.41 
  
  Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
              Buffer Nowait %:   99.98 ;      Redo NoWait %:   99.86
              Buffer  Hit   %:   99.92 ;   In-memory Sort %:  100.00
              Library Hit   %:   96.30 ;       Soft Parse %:   94.96
           Execute to Parse %:   52.74 ;        Latch Hit %:   99.07
  Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:    0.35 ;    % Non-Parse CPU:   99.30 
  
  Shared Pool Statistics        Begin    End
                                ------  ------
               Memory Usage %:   75.48 ;  75.51
      % SQL with executions>1:   79.92 ;  85.03
    % Memory for SQL w/exec>1:   77.07 ;  70.09 
  
  Top 5 Timed Events                                         Avg %Total
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                                        wait   Call
  Event                                 Waits    Time (s)   (ms)   Time Wait Class
  ------------------------------ ------------ ----------- ------ ------ ----------
  db file sequential read               9,052      17,688   1954   51.3 ;  User I/O
  log file switch (checkpoint in        5,303       4,649    877   13.5 Configurat
  log file switch completion            4,245       4,023    948   11.7 Configurat
  wait for a undo record               32,393       3,531    109   10.3 ;     Other
  db file parallel write               18,771       3,437    183   10.0 System I/O 
  

  haven't seen as much waiting on average. For example, 877ms for "log file switch" is above the threshold. And other events waiting too...

  
  Time Model Statistics                DB/Inst: MDMPRJ/MDMPRJ  Snaps: 2840-2841
  -> Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 34446.5s
  -> Statistics including the word "background" measure background process
     time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic
  -> Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name 
  
  Statistic Name                                       Time (s) % of DB Time
  ------------------------------------------ ------------------ ------------
  sql execute elapsed time                              4,008.5 ;        11.6
  parse time elapsed                                      352.9 ;         1.0
  hard parse elapsed time                                 352.7 ;         1.0
  PL/SQL compilation elapsed time                         120.1 ;          .3
  DB CPU                                                   61.8 ;          .2
  failed parse elapsed time                                21.3 ;          .1
  PL/SQL execution elapsed time                             8.0 ;          .0
  connection management call elapsed time                   0.0 ;          .0
  hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time                0.0 ;          .0
  repeated bind elapsed time                                0.0 ;          .0
  hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed time                   0.0 ;          .0
  DB time                                              34,446.5 ;         N/A
  background elapsed time                              14,889.7 ;         N/A
  background cpu time                                      39.0 ;         N/A
            ------------------------------------------------------------- 
  
  Wait Class                            DB/Inst: MDMPRJ/MDMPRJ  Snaps: 2840-2841
  -> s  - second
  -> cs - centisecond -     100th of a second
  -> ms - millisecond -    1000th of a second
  -> us - microsecond - 1000000th of a second
  -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc 
  
                                                                    Avg
                                         %Time       Total Wait    wait     Waits
  Wait Class                      Waits  -outs         Time (s)    (ms)      /txn
  -------------------- ---------------- ------ ---------------- ------- ---------
  User I/O                       10,515     .1           17,785    1691      15.8
  Configuration                  10,186   79.5 ;           8,865     870      15.3
  System I/O                     27,619     .0            8,774     318      41.6
  Other                          57,768   98.3 ;           6,915     120      87.0
  Commit                          2,634   88.6 ;           2,481     942       4.0
  Concurrency                     2,847   75.4 ;           2,240     787       4.3
  Application                       219    2.3 ;              23     105       0.3
  Network                         4,790     .0                0       0       7.2
            ------------------------------------------------------------- 
  

  once seen it yet, there is an expectation very strong user IO

  
  Wait Events                          DB/Inst: MDMPRJ/MDMPRJ  Snaps: 2840-2841
  -> s  - second
  -> cs - centisecond -     100th of a second
  -> ms - millisecond -    1000th of a second
  -> us - microsecond - 1000000th of a second
  -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last) 
  
                                                                     Avg
                                               %Time  Total Wait    wait     Waits
  Event                                 Waits  -outs    Time (s)    (ms)      /txn
  ---------------------------- -------------- ------ ----------- ------- ---------
  db file sequential read               9,052     .0      17,688    1954      13.6
  log file switch (checkpoint           5,303   78.0 ;      4,649     877       8.0
  log file switch completion            4,245   89.2 ;      4,023     948       6.4
  wait for a undo record               32,393   99.8 ;      3,531     109      48.8
  db file parallel write               18,771     .0       3,437     183      28.3
  wait for stopper event to be         24,203   99.8 ;      2,634     109      36.5
  log file sync                         2,634   88.6 ;      2,481     942       4.0
  control file sequential read          7,356     .0       2,431     330      11.1
  buffer busy waits                     2,513   83.1 ;      2,173     865       3.8
  log file parallel write                 520     .0       1,566    3012       0.8
  control file parallel write             840     .0       1,334    1588       1.3
  rdbms ipc reply                         172   91.3 ;        330    1916       0.3
  enq: CF - contention                    309   23.0 ;        268     867       0.5
  log buffer space                        638   28.5 ;        192     301       1.0
  enq: PS - contention                     52   23.1 ;         71    1362       0.1
  db file scattered read                  113     .0          67     590       0.2
  os thread startup                        76   77.6 ;         63     834       0.1
  reliable message                         57   78.9 ;         50     878       0.1
  enq: RO - fast object reuse              22   22.7 ;         23    1038       0.0
  latch free                              537     .0          16      30       0.8
  Streams AQ: qmn coordinator               3  100.0 ;         15    5005       0.0 
  

  Overrides

  
  Background Wait Events               DB/Inst: MDMPRJ/MDMPRJ  Snaps: 2840-2841
  -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last) 
  
                                                                     Avg
                                               %Time  Total Wait    wait     Waits
  Event                                 Waits  -outs    Time (s)    (ms)      /txn
  ---------------------------- -------------- ------ ----------- ------- ---------
  db file parallel write               18,772     .0       3,437     183      28.3
  events in waitclass Other            24,367   99.5 ;      3,010     124      36.7
  control file sequential read          6,654     .0       2,333     351      10.0
  log file parallel write                 520     .0       1,566    3012       0.8
  control file parallel write             840     .0       1,334    1588       1.3
  buffer busy waits                       899   94.2 ;        884     984       1.4
  log file switch (checkpoint             206   82.0 ;        185     898       0.3
  os thread startup                        76   77.6 ;         63     834       0.1
  log file switch completion               46   93.5 ;         45     982       0.1
  log buffer space                        158   31.0 ;         12      77       0.2
  db file sequential read                  62     .0           7     111       0.1
  db file scattered read                   20     .0           6     318       0.0
  direct path read                        660     .0           5       7       1.0
  log file sequential read                 66     .0           4      65       0.1
  log file single write                    66     .0           1      16       0.1
  enq: RO - fast object reuse               2     .0           0      38       0.0
  latch: cache buffers chains               3     .0           0       6       0.0
  direct path write                       660     .0          -5      -8       1.0
  rdbms ipc message                     9,052   87.5 ;     21,399    2364      13.6
  pmon timer                            1,318   90.4 ;      3,562    2703       2.0
  Streams AQ: qmn coordinator             633   97.6 ;      3,546    5602       1.0
  Streams AQ: waiting for time             77   61.0 ;      3,449   44795       0.1
  PX Deq: Join ACK                         21     .0           0       0       0.0 
  

  Once again exceeded

  
  Tablespace IO Stats                  DB/Inst: MDMPRJ/MDMPRJ  Snaps: 2840-2841
  -> ordered by IOs (Reads + Writes) desc 
  
  Tablespace
  ------------------------------
                   Av      Av     Av                       Av     Buffer Av Buf
           Reads Reads/s Rd(ms) Blks/Rd       Writes Writes/s      Waits Wt(ms)
  -------------- ------- ------ ------- ------------ -------- ---------- ------
  UNDOTBS1
             914       0 ######     1.0 ;   1,368,515      383      2,534  863.2
  MDMREF_INDICES
           6,918       2 ######     1.0 ;      11,086        3          0    0.0
  SYSAUX
             626       0 ######     1.1 ;       1,804        1          0    0.0
  SYSTEM
             850       0 ######     1.7 ;         296        0          0    0.0
  MDMREF_DATA
             293       0  712.3 ;    1.0 ;         274        0          0    0.0
  MDMPRJ_ODS
             198       0   72.1 ;    1.0 ;         198        0          0    0.0
  FEU_VERT
              33       0   61.5 ;    1.0 ;          33        0          0    0.0
  USERS
              33       0   31.5 ;    1.0 ;          33        0          0    0.0
            ------------------------------------------------------------- 
  

  Now have a serious look. AV Dr (ms). For a value of tablespace cannot event now enter the window that's why its display #.

  According to the recommendation of the oracle Av Rd (ms) should not be greater than 20, if his will on 20 so its considered to be a problem with the IO subsystem. But as its seen in your case its passing.

  Now the question on my side
  Did configuration changes?
  I suggest you undo these changes as soon as possible and to communicate with the storage admin guys...

  Hope this helps

• representatives of windows call to fix the problem sent windows reports?

  I have just recived a call from the India? Windows representing the man he new my name and address and said that the problem reports sent to you guys have indercating that in a week my computer will crash completely unless I have with its help go on my computer and change it. I refused and asked him to sent me this information and he just refused to listen to and I had to hang up. Not sure if it was a scam or he was just tring to help... cheers from Jane

  Its a scam / fake. Ignore it

• HP50G equations w / complex real Vars & solve for reports of Vars

  Hi guys. I have 2 questions.
  
  1. given an equation with a variable complex and variable real in it, I want to solve for both variables. Here is an example
  
  Given:
  ∠120 has° + jb =-4 + j3
  
  Solve for A and b.
  
  Answer:
  
  A = 8
  b = -3.93

  I know it's possible to solve by hand because A is true and b is complex. But I don't know how to do this on the HP50G because the equation has two variables inside.

  2 it will probably be a bit more complicated. Saw 2 symbolic equations, I want to solve for the report of two variables with respect to the other variables. Here is an example.
  
  Given:
  
  (X Z) / Q + (X - Y) / (X - Y) + R / Q = 0
  / Q (X - Y) = Y/R
  
  Solve for Y/Z depending on X, Q and R
  
  Answer:
  Y/Z = [/(Q+R) R] ^ 2

  I'd be very impressed if anyone can understand these out or already knows how do the following.
  
  Thanks in advance!

  Hello

  (1) :

  It's my approach:

  Settings of the calculator:

  -angle mode: radians (required for the Solver)

  -coord system: rectangular (my choice as it fits x + y * i).

  -Digital and about unchecked

  -operating mode: RPN

  -Flag-27 value complex display that x + y * I

  First angle must be converted to radians, 120 deg = 2/3 * PI radians (PI can be entered as WhiteShift SPC).

  Enter ' (A, ∠2/3 * PI) + B * i =-4 + 3 * I '

  I use 2/3 integers to facilitate the exact mode of address, shortened to ∠ is ALHPA, redshift, 6.

  That the calculator is in rectangular mode, it will be transformed into rectangular.

  You should now have:

  A * COS(2/3*PI) + A * SIN (2/3 * PI) * + B * i =-4 + 3 * I

  Now, press ENTER to duplicate the equation.

  Go to WhiteShift MTH, CMPLX.

  Select RE for the real part:

  A * COS (2/3 * PI) =-4

  Press SWAP (silver arrow)

  Select IM to the imaginary part:

  A * SIN(2/3*PI) + B = 3

  You should now have 2 equations on the stack (the real part of level 2) and the imaginary part in level 1

  You can now put them in a table (2,-> TABLE) and use the Solver to solve for A and b.

  NOTE: when you use real numbers instead of integers, you may use the digital Solver of multiple equations MSLV (NUM. SLV). This requires a set of initial parameters i.e. guess (see Chapter 7 of the great user's Guide or MSLV AUR).

  (2) :

  You cannot resolve Y/Z directly. However, you can solve for and there, Z , then simply ÷ to get Y/Z.

  Level 2: [(X-Z) / Q + (X - Y) / (X - Y) + R / Q = 0 (X - Y) / Q = Y/R]

  Level 1: [Y - Z]

  S.SLV, point 6 or F6 to SOLVE

  Will result in a list or a table that contains solutions for Y and Z depending on X, Q and r. use OBJ-> once or twice to put both equations separately on the stack, then press fracture for Y/Z.

  Note, you can change the representation of the solution by the factor or simplify (best way to find who is to press down arrow money to enter the Equation Editor, select the right side of the eqation then de FACTO or SIMP).

  I hope this helps.

• Representatives of Tech support

  Do you have technical assistance representatives call saying that there is a suspicious activity going on my computer and I do give you the permission to take control. These people are literally hart add me. The number they call from East (646) 820-3928

  No, Microsoft will not do that.  It is a SCAM.  Report this activity to the http://support.microsoft.com/reportascam

• Microsoft representative survey

  I just got a call from a Jack Hardy, who pretended to be a representative Microsoft investigating damage to my computer because my computer downloads.  After that I expressed some hesitation he wanted me to verify his identity (00442032397020) by dialing a number to give me.  We got cut off before that happened.  Can you tell me if Microsoft would contact me like this.  My suspicion is that it is connected to the messages that appear sometimes for me to respond to errors to Microsoft.  Comments?

  It's a scam! Do not leave them in your computer! A search on these forums and you will see a HUGE amount of them being reported. Just hang up on them. Microsoft will never call you unsolicited.

  I hope this helps.

• How can I report email address spam so that it can be blocked from hacking into my account and e-mailing my contacts?

  Original title: How can I report junk e-mail address, so it can be blocked to hack my account & * offshore contacts

  I'm sick & tired of being hacked on & on again by foreign sources, I recently discovered my yahoo account took advantage of Turkey & today that they are now my msn account hacking this is the second time I realized hack & spam there must be an easier way to communicate with someone on msn security represents my friends are pissed at me because it continues to send MSN I changed my the yahoo account password & also my password msn, but nothing seems to stop these predators which is msn do to catch these nut jobs

  Hello

  Sounds like you're being spoofed and not hacked. The emails appear in your sent
  Records showing you sent them?

  Which is called Spoofing and its pretty easy for a spammer to make. Of course, it does
  it look like you or the other person has sent the e-mail. Someone intercepted an email and
  It may not be you who caused him. Account of a friend could have been consulted
  or even someone could have sent an email on your behalf to someone else who has been
  compromise. Your friend can access headers and block the real senders of
  those who will change often.

  How to read the message headers
  http://www.emailaddressmanager.com/tips/header.html

  What Email Headers can tell you about the origin of Spam
  http://email.about.com/cs/spamgeneral/a/spam_headers.htm

  E-mail spoofing
  http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spoofing

  E-mail spoofing and Phishing
  http://www.mailsbroadcast.com/email.broadcast.FAQ/46.email.spoofing.htm

  Understanding E-mail Spoofing
  http://www.windowsecurity.com/articles/email-spoofing.html

  Fraudulent emails (false)
  http://pages.eBay.com/education/spooftutorial/

  Google search - email Spoofing
  http://www.Google.com/search?hl=en&EI=FB1nS9DiNo7CsQPNhKGdAw&SA=X&Oi=spell&resnum=0&CT=result&CD=1&ved=0CAgQBSgA&q=email+spoofing&spell=1

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle="" -="" mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

• Alleged windows phone representative called to say that my computer was doing a lot of mistakes

  original title: representative of Windows Phone?

  I have an old Dell laptop with Windows XP. A person named [(510)943-3040] a Mark called and said my computer was a lot of mistakes and has been infected. If I turn on my computer, it would be happy to turn it off for me.  I get a lot of error messages - send error report, for example, but I don't think you would contact me in this way. Am I wrong? What should I do if he was right? John Clark

  It is a phishing attempt! Do not give any information.

  Reported people on these calls for a person who represents Windows (note: not Microsoft).

  It is a scam! Not to follow their instructions or advice and not to provide ANY information to them.

  Because they use the internet lines and/or phone to complete their fraud, there may be federal agencies in your country who are interested in discovering their calls. Their report directly to the appropriate agency if you feel you can contribute to their arrest and the charges.

  Microsoft do NOT pick up the phone and start dialing customers and never phones/e-mails asking for personal information or asking them to visit a web site!

  On another note, if you encounter any problems with your computer, please do not hesitate to post a desription of situation and the error messages you received in those forums. We would be happy to help you. (information staff unnecessary or requested !)

• Report on the ability of virtual machines VMware Cluster

  We started to evaluate Foglight for capacity planning and evaluation. One of the reports that I believe is interested in our leadership is the "ability of virtual machines VMware Cluster" report. I see that the report provides a value for the VMS remaining. I would like to learn a little more about this value and how is it calculated:

  1. What exactly a 'virtual machine' represents in these reports?
  2. Can a similar report to run using a specific type of server based on the allocation of resources or patterned after an existing VM wokload?

  We are a small, medium and large VM offering based on the allocation of resources. I would like to change the report to display the number of each type of virtual machine I have available... or pointer pointing to an existing virtual machine, and according to its resources and workload, determine how this server, I have available.

  It is based on the average size of the virtual machine in the cluster.  If you look at the dashboard of capacity management in the user interface, it can give you more details by cluster.  It is based on the average of the use of min/max/AVG across all virtual machines in a period given (usually 90 days).  This can not be changed today, but there is work to allow lets you specify a size of slot for something as small, medium, large, etc...

  This feature exists in the Foglight for virtualization, however Standard Edition.  It might be interesting to watch this, if you need it sooner.

• Report capability with VFoglight 6.1

  Hello
  I was looking for a way to generate reports of ability as follows.
  1. it should display a summary of what is current and additional capacity for VM with the statndard configuration.
  I know that capacity planning cartridge can do that, however can who enforce it against cluster?
  Kind regards
  Paresh

  OOTB, this is impossible, but a member of our sales team created a cartridge that has the ability to do so.
  I suggest that you contact your sales representative and ask about the velocity cartridge.
  It's a cartridge not supported as vBundle-1, but both are beautiful cartridges to have nonetheless.
  -Larry

• Annex report error

  Hi, someone ran into problems when you try to download reports (additional report) in the portal provider Blackberry?

  I tried to download the reports on demand. Shortly after, I received an email advising me the report and he gave me a link to download the report. When I followed the link there is nothing there. He said: "no available reports to download.

  I think I get the correct value for the type of report, name of the product, the start date and end date.

  Maybe the site is in maintenance? I tried to contact the seller by email Support but do not have

  response.

  Thank you

  Yes, it is a known issue and claims RIM working on a fix.

  He has been erratic for more than a month now get download reports while shopping is in contrast a no go area. There is actually another thread with a response from a RIM representative

• Phone calls from representatives of Windows

  Original title: ask yourself

  Windows representatives call you during the night. I get calls from people who say they are windows, last night phoned an Indian man and my partner has been pretty rough on him and then hung up, there's these true followers?

  Hello

  Yes, it's a SCAM!

  Report a scam to technical support
  https://support.Microsoft.com/getsupport/?oaspworkflow=start_1.0.0.0&wfname=scamsurvey&CCSID=635596204228150092&WA=wsignin1.0

  Avoid scams to phone for tech support
  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/avoid-phone-scams.aspx

  Scams by e-mail or web: how to protect yourself - understands what to do if you
  think you've been scammed.
  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/phishing-scams.aspx

  How to recognize phishing e-mails, phone calls or links
  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/phishing-symptoms.aspx

  In the United States, you can contact the local police to the FBI, Attorney general, and
  consumer watch groups. Arm yourself with knowledge.

  The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) is a partnership between the
  Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the National White Collar Crime Center
  (NW3C), funded in part by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA).
  http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/default.aspx

  No, Microsoft wouldn't you not solicited. Nor would they know if any errors
  It exists on your computer. So those are the frauds or scams to get your money or
  worse to steal your identity.

  Avoid scams that use the Microsoft name fraudulently: Microsoft has no
  for you unsolicited telephone calls help fix your computer
  http://www.Microsoft.com/protect/fraud/phishing/msName.aspx

  Scams and hoaxes
  http://support.Microsoft.com/contactus/cu_sc_virsec_master?ws=support#tab3

  Microsoft Support Center consumer
  https://consumersecuritysupport.Microsoft.com/default.aspx?altbrand=true&SD=GN&ln=en-us&St=1&wfxredirect=1&gssnb=1

  Microsoft technical support
  http://support.Microsoft.com/contactus/?ws=support#TAB0

  Microsoft - contact technical support
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/contact-support

  Phone scams
  http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0076-phone-scams

  Limit unwanted calls & Emails
  http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/topics/limiting-unwanted-calls-emails

  National do not call registry for
  https://www.DoNotCall.gov/

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle=""><- mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

• What the p/c/S fields in the average of the aggregate report?

  What the p/c/S fields in the average of the aggregate report?

  "'P' represents Parent (chassis), 'C' represents for the child (map), and ' is the abbreviation of stand-alone card.

  June