Restrict the creation of Instances of entity of an entity that is deducted

Similar Questions

• Support for the creation of instances of entity through rules

  Hello
  
  Y at - it helps to generate an instance of an entity purely through rules? For example, if I have an entity called "VerificationItems", can I write a rule in the OPA, which will be an instance of this entity by element of verification that the applicant must produce (as a single instance for proof of address, a single instance for SSN etc.).
  
  Thank you
  Sam

  Hi Sam,
  I believe that the creation of the instance through rules is coming in 10.4, otherwise you will need to use a listener of inference to generate instances.
  However if the list of things that the applicant must produce is finite and knowable, then it could probably be done only through rules without having to generate instances. You could have them as rules in terms of the applicant, such as "the applicant must provide proof of address", "the applicant must provide a SSN.
  If the person has more than one address, then the rule of the 'evidence' should perhaps for each address, for example.

  We have implemented a system like this to do with the 'actions' in Sweden that work similarly to your suggestion, and it worked fine without the need to create these instances. I don't know the size of your modules but certainly create instances will have an impact on performance, so I recommend you to avoid if you can.

  Hope this helps,
  Ben

  Senior consultant
  Solutions of Monad
  http://www.monadsolutions.com

• Application of the rules to Instances of entity in a sequence (multiple calls necessary?)

  Hello
  
  In my OPA team, we have a situation in which it would be useful to be able to run a series of calculations on a set of instances sequentially. We wonder if there is an acceptable method for this in a single call to a modules, because the OPA does not allow a loop or a sequential processing of data in a way that seems obvious.
  
  Context:
  Consider a situation involving a computation that can be performed on a single Bill, but we have a series of bills to deal with. For example, let's say that there are a certain amount of a deduction or "co-payments" that must be subtracted from the large bills, but is deducted in greater quantity of invoices received earlier (rather than be distributed also among them) and then will deplete fairly once was subtracted in all. In this case, it is not sufficient to use a statement of the type «for each of the Bills...» "because the conditions for the calculation have to change with each invoice. This seems to require the ability to browse an ordered list, but we do not know if something like this is possible (without violating an axiom or advised).
  
  Ideas:
  The best idea we could come to would be to use a time stamp to identify the Bill earlier as a starting point and then use the function of 'unknown' to force the rules to calculate the deduction for 'other' more former Bill in sequence. The current solution will be to call several times modules by an external script that loops through the Bills.
  
  To sum up, we wonder whether there is an acceptable approach to apply a set of rules to an entity instance before to apply the same rules to others, without requiring multiple calls for modules.
  
  Thank you!
  -Patrick
  
  Published by: Patrick guess on July 6, 2011 19:11

  You started down the right path. To quickly answer questions, there is no need for multiple calls to the basis of rules, no for ranking explicit rules or data.

  The challenge when using unordered rules / systems of determinations is out procedural thinking (that loops or sequencing data explicit is required). The solution is by expressing the declarative logic equivalent (which requires no sequence with the right answer). In this case, consider the calculation from the perspective of one invoice at a time and write the rules that express properly how much to pay, what is the quota, etc. For the batch processing where running tallies are needed, there is something practical for use in the rule based systems - conclude the subtotal per each item being counted (for example, remaining annual quota through each invoice). This approach allows the declarative rules which "defined" the method calculate the score by a Bill, so that the following invoices can use the score of previous bills. Unfortunately, the description abstract approach always sounds more confused, so here is an example of rule of pseudocode that can communicate the key elements of the approach...

  Assume:
  Bills have numbers (or dates/hours) which can be used to conclude an absolute order for all bills (we will use Bill in ordering them in this example)
  Remaining annual quota of the person is the initial amount of copay remaining before the current batch of invoices is treated
  Each invoice must include a co-payment of $50 (for simplicity, although this could be concluded by rules and vary based on the services provided, etc.)
  Assume all bills are more than the share (again to simplify this example, this could be dealt with in the rules of both conditions)
  The main objectives of the basis of rules are to determine the share of each invoice and the balance sheet of the share of the person (i.e. copay they may still have to pay this year) after treats a batch of invoices.

  Pseudo rules to get the general concept:

  Set the order in which the bills need to be addressed...
  -The Bill (prior Bill) is a member of previous invoices of the invoice if the s prior invoice ID< the="" invoice's="">
  -The Bill (later Bill) is a member of the subsequent invoices of the invoice if the invoice later s ID > ID of the invoice
  -The Bill (Bill immediately preceding) is a member of if immediately before invoice
  the immediately previous invoice is a member, if the prior Bill of Bill AND
  the number of previous invoices of the invoice with ID > ID of the invoice immediately before = 0

  To conclude the first remaining share of each invoice... put them in a table of rules, so they can conclude the same attribute but use different logical formulas
  -Initial remaining Copay of the invoice = remaining share of the person if the number of the invoice is immediately previous bills is 0 (i.e. the first Bill in the batch)
  -Initial remaining Copay of the invoice = share of remaining final invoice of the immediately previous invoice (i.e. each ' initial rest copay "is the same that the invoice immediately before the 'final remaining copay)

  A table is used to define how much share for each invoice - two possible scenarios...
  -Share of the invoice = $50 if the original invoice remaining share > = $50
  -Share of the Bill remaining share = original invoice if the original invoice remaining quota<>

  A rule to determine the final remaining share of each invoice (i.e. after subtracting the share upward through this invoice of the annual overall amount of the person)
  -Copay remaining final invoice = remaining share original of the invoice - share of the Bill

  A rule to determine the person remains final share (i.e. After all invoices in this batch have been processed)
  -remaining share final person = final remaining share of the Bill if later the invoice s County bills = 0 (i.e. the final copay remaining of the 'last' Bill in the batch)

  Note that some attributes and relationships above are not absolutely necessary (i.e., it is not necessary to postpone the two remaining original co-pay and determine a final remaining share by invoice, but it retains the logic of each a little more simple rule).

  Hope that helps...

• Service contract for the creation of Instance IB number Mfg

  Hi team,

  We have a customer's requirement, we need to create a Service of Mfg contract for a given Instance IB number. Can you please let me know, if we have an API for it?

  I tried to create the contract using the Oks_Contracts_Pub.Create_Contract_Header API, but this contract is not associated with the Instance in IB.

  Please help provide ideas on that. We are on 11.5.10 version.

  Thank you/Suresh K

  Solution: You need to associate the contract with line covered with this serial number.

• Restriction similar creation of descr field name

  Hello

  How can we limit the entrance of the similar description different node name field.

  to clarify more on my request, DRM does not allow to create nodes with the same name, instead it create a next node as the same name a node shared.

  but it allows us to create different nodes with different node name but with a description similar to value i, e a core.descr of base property.

  How we can restrict the creation of similar description field in DRM.

  Is there any property setting should be attributed or no validation can be created that runs as a real-time allows not two similar to create description field.

  Hi Madhu,

  Although his delay could you please check the version levels validation script to restrict a similar description through a version below:

  ========================================================================

  var hierlist = version. GetHierarchies();
  var i;
  var u;
  var a1 = [];
  var hiername;
  var errm = "duplicate value Description';
  var desArray = [];

  for (i = 0; i< hierlist.length;="">
  {
  hiername = version. HierByAbbrev (hierlist [i]);
  var n1 = version. NodeByAbbrev (hiername. TopNode.PropValue ("Core.Abbrev"));
  A1 = n1. GetDescendants ("True", "True");
  for (u = 0; u< a1.length;="">
  {
        
  var version = wink. NodeByAbbrev (a1 [u]);
  the var = blink of an eye. PropValue ("Core.Descr");
  (a) desArray.push;
  }

  }

  for (var j = 0; j)< desarray.length;="">
  {
  for (var k = j; k< desarray.length;="">
  {
  If (j! = k & (desArray [j] == desArray [k]) & desArray [j]! = "" & desArray [k]!) = "")
  {
            
  return {}
  success: false,
  Parameters: [errm]
  }
  }
         
  }
  }
  Returns true;

  ========================================================================

  Thank you

  Kay

• Restrict the VI Client Session

  Hello

  We have an environment vSphere 4.0 with Virtual Center currently also on 4.0

  We have a customer who specifically wants a service account integrated into VC for some software sought to use that gathers info vCPU and host pCPU where their live VM and we gave that service acocunt read only access in VC.

  However, it is kind of a risk for us since now they can just download a VI client and to use the service account to enter VC and have visibility on the environment which we do not necessarily want.

  I know that there are options to restrict the IPS to hosts / VC however do not think that it is an optimal solution and do not know how many intellectual property can the client uses to get there.

  Y at - it a script or a another method that everyone knows that can be limited using the VI client for a particular user or a script that puts an end to a session as soon as someone connects to the VC?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hello

  the VI client uses exactly the same Webservices APIs that scripts or software the customer uses to query information for vCenter.

  This means at the level of the Protocol that you cannot distinguish queries performed by the VI client and requests made by another program.

  Even if you find a way to make the VI client inaccessible to your customer (I doubt this is even possible) it will still be able to use a PowerCLI script or another tool to read all the vCenter data to which he has access.

  What you really need to do is:

  -Isolate resources (networks hosts, VMs, data warehouses,...) that your customer has access to in a separate object data center in vCenter

  -Limit read access to the data center of the service account or even for the subset of its objects for which it should have read access.

  Depending on the requirements of your customers (and your willingness to accomplish...), it can be more or less complex and tedious know how to limit access to the objects in vCenter as it is able to query the data required, but nothing more.

  -Andreas

• Create an Instance of the entity that is conditional on a screen

  We must stop to create instances of entity or to disable the creation of entity instances if the answer to a question from attribute on the same screen is = 1.

  For example

  If the answer to the question on a screen as - passport how much you care-> 1

  THEN

  Disable creation of more instances of entity on the screen

  Is there a way we can achieve this?

  I think that this can be achieved by modifying VM preference patterns - EntityInstanceCollectGroup.vm etc. where we can check the value of the attribute and therefore hide the entity instance collect buttons.

  But the problem is that it must be implemented on the same screen before submitting it.

  How can we achieve two things?

  Is it possible?

  It should be possible kertis, but you will need to write java script, the basic approach that I would take would be something like:

  -Listen to change that control the number of passports - hide or show the entity collect control as desired.

  -Save with an error event in the rules to ensure consistency.

• Creating new Instances of entity within the OPA

  This is another that I think I know the answer to, but I think that it is better to confirm.
  
  In earlier versions, it was not possible to create instances of entity within Office RuleBurst/Haley rules. Is this always the case in the OPA?
  
  For example, my periods are determine the status of a case and the reasons why this status has been determined. May be denied the status of the case and the reasons can be 'client invalid Id', ' expenses ratio too high income', ' main customer don't work is not long enough "etc. I want to return all the reasons of the State. While the list of grounds is predetermined, those that apply to a particular case are dynamic, like everything, but not all may apply.
  
  In view of this situation by using a database, I create an instance of the reason for each of them there are and bind it to the case. In the past, with the OPA predecessor (s), it was not possible to create new instances of in. They had all be spent in the module or a list of eligible reasons all attributes had to be created and then set true to those who have applied.
  
  My preference is to create instances inside the OPA. Are these features available in the current version?
  
  Thank you
  Terry

  Hello Terry,

  Michael is correct that you can not write rules at design allowing to dynamically create instances of the entity during execution time. However, new features of alleged of v10 relations might deal with what you're trying to do.

  You can write rules that conclude the accession of an inferred relationship. So you might still have, say, 10 cases of "reason" in all cases, but as for which of these instances apply in all cases, it depends on the details of the case. You can use a relationship inferred from gather up the entity instances that apply in this case.

  First, you must set up a regular one-to-many relationship to instantiate 10 instances during execution - this would be in the usual way. Then, you must also set up an inferred relationship and write rules for the relationship inferred members concluded. Instances that are part of the inferred relationship are then actually the list of entity instances you wanted to create in your example above.

  Take a look at this article OPM help: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/applications/policy-automation/help/opm10_1/Content/Rules%20using%20entity%20instances/Reason_about_relship_between_2_entities.htm

  See you soon,.
  Jasmine

• Prevent the creation of new user accounts in Vista

  Is there a way to prevent the creation of new user accounts in Windows Vista? What about restricting internet access to all new account that is created? Help! :)

  Hello

  If your contact is logged on as administrator, then he or she can create a new user account. If you don't want someone else to create a new user account, you can then create a standard account for them, in this way, they will not have the privilege to create a new user account.

  Create a user account

  If you don't want to give them access to the internet, then you can use the parental control.

  Set up Parental controls (Vista)

  Hope that helps.

• Configure replication vSphere fails - there is a virtual machine that has the same UUID instance than the one you are trying to configure

  Hi all

  
  

  My colleague was trying to extend a hard disk of a server 2008R2 who (1) had a snapshot and (2) was being replicated. The operation has failed and they took the snapshot replication can be stopped. Long story short when I got to him, the server could not be configured for replication and could not extend the disk and a vMotion failed.

  Looking at the files of the VM on the data store and the VMs .vmx file we have all the characteristics of a virtual machine always configured for replication of vSphere. If you try to configure replication vSphere causes an instant error "vsphere replication does not support change the length of a replicated disk. After a few changes I can reconfigure vSphere new replication, however, when the wizard has finished, I get a new error message (see below):

  "Try to set up vSphere that replication has failed for the VM"name vm"during the creation of groups"vm". There is a virtual "vm-name" machine that has the same instance UUID ' UUID of the Virtual Machine "that you want to configure. The existing vSphere of replication is configured for site protection.

  A possible solution would be to reset the database embedded VRMS our DR as suggested here VR configure replication after losing a VC site server but I was wondering if there is another solution? I have not reset the database of VRM before and cannot find a document that tells exactly what to do. I guess I need to stop all the rehearsals before resetting the database?

  See you soon,.

  Dean

  Hello

  There is no need to reset the VRMS database.

  If you know the value GID... an orphan replication, you can use the CROWD VRMS (https://vrms_address:8043/mob/?moid=GID-...&vmodl=1) to call the destroy method - it is eliminating simple replication to the site of the source or the target.

  If you don't know the GID... value, it can be found of VRMS DB or log files. Please file an SR for assistance.

  This procedure is already documented in internal KB articles and help using VMware support:

  KB article internal 2056086, section "cannot replicate virtual machine as there is another virtual machine with the same UUID instance"

  and also internal KB article 2060751.

  The admin guide section will be updated as it is confusing right now by suggesting only to reset the DB.

  Kind regards

  Martin

• Creating Instances of entity on new Page/screen OWD

  Hey all,.

  I was wondering if anyone has tried collecting each instance of an entity of OWD on a new page?

  I.e. collect entity screen opens with 1 created the default instance when I press on "Add an Instance", instead of add at the bottom of the current screen, move on to a new page containing only the new entity instance attribute. Each instance is on a page by itself.

  Thanks in advance!

  Gladis

  Hi Joey

  The concept here is to maintain a list of instances of entity on a page, as usual, with an addition of button and Edit + Delete buttons for those who are already added. There are several ways to achieve this, as in jQuery on top of the standard screen or with a plugin custom screen to have complete control over the layout. The common theme is that you would basically make LOOK as of the separate pages, rather than being actually the separate pages.

  Concerning
  Andrew

• How to restrict the new line in input field or delete the last tank in as3?

  Sorry, Noobie here!

  I have a text entry box. If you press ENTER, a new line starts; What makes the line previous invisible unless you press the BACKSPACE key.

  So, if I type '1' in the input box, then hit eneter the number '1' becomes invisible, except if I retaliate.

  Now, I still need the Enter key because I have an event listener that calls a function once it's in a hurry, but I still need that '1' is visible.

  So, I need to be:

  To be able to restrict the field of the creation of a new line (line authorized max = 1)

  or

  To delete the last character entered in the text of entry if you press the Enter key.

  These two should be the same result, but I don't know how to do both.

  If anyone can help, I would be very grateful!

  Turn off your textfield object multiline:

  your_tf. Multiline = false;

• condition for the creation of EO

  is it possible to create of EO without primary key? (not available in the primary key table and I do not used row id)
  
  
  Thank you
  Prateek

  As far as I know, the primary key or the row id is required for the creation of EO...
  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E12839_01/Web.1111/b31974/bcentities.htm#sm0133

  4.2.3.2. what happens if a Table has no primary key
  If a table has no primary key constraint, then JDeveloper cannot deduct the primary key of the entity object. Because each entity object must have at least one attribute marked as primary key, the wizard will create an attribute named RowID and use the database of ROWID value as the primary key of the entity. If necessary, you can edit the entity object later to mark a different attribute as the primary key and remove the attribute of RowID. When you use the wizard create an entity object and you have not set up another attribute like primary key, you will be asked to use RowID as the primary key.

• Generate a rule to show several instances of entity attributes

  Hey!
  
  Phil (the still waiting for beginner training here). I have a little trouble getting the aliasing to work when I want to perform a check on the same entity non-singleton.
  
  I have a scenario set up when an entity of non-singleton attribute 5 (let's call it 'the child') will generate a maximum of 10 times (source of data-> muiltiple Oracle dbs).
  
  I need to generate a rule (or rules) to report a failure when the no. recovered children is > 10 AND to display each attribute of the up of 10 entities "the child."
  
  so far I have generated the following:
  
  
  
  the BusRule (limiting the number of children) works correctly if
  the number of X_children < 11
  
  the number of X_children = InstanceCount (text value of relationship "the child")
  
  
  
  SO at this point I have a check for the number of instances of 'the child' entity and one indicator if there is > 10 entity instances (so I'm halfway there!)
  I played with the following to try to display each of the attributes of each of the children (up to 10) that are returned (below is the first example, I tried with the child.firstname attribute)
  
  
  Display of up to 10 X_children attributes works if
  ForAllScope (text value for the "child" link, children)
  and
  first name of the MCH is known * the number of X_children
  
  
  HOWEVER - I get the HTTP 500 error (stack trace indicates the modules failed to load cos ' Subpremise to quantify local must be Boolean "). I kindof get the bulk of the error response, but do not understand why he thinks that it is Boolean.
  
  All I need essentially to know is 1. How to view each of the attributes for each instance of the entity and 2. What I'm doing wrong.
  
  As in my previous post, I feel that I should apologize because I'm not sure if I provide enough information or even good info for anyone to understand what I'm talking about because I have yet to attend training (I only used the tool for the last 2 days) and so I'm limited to trawl through the help files , so I appreciate any help/advice anyone can provide!
  
  NB: I'm using OPM v10.1
  
  See you soon,.
  
  Phil

  I have not read all the details here, but for purposes of validation, error or warning events are another option to consider.

  ForAll requires you to put your condition in the same line (the condition is generally defined as a rule by the way).

  ForAllScope allows you to continue your rule to put conditions on the following (indented) lines of the rules. If you want to disambiguate on a reference to the same entity in the bottom of your rule conditions, ForAllScope allows you also to alias of this entity in the lower part of the rules to another name. For example, this allows you to talk about "brothers and sisters" as part of one of the kids 'parents.

  Davin.

• Getting the activity process instance information

  We need following:
  
  The process instance will be created manually or integration of another system. It is not possible to have two instances running in the same process, so we want to check if there is already an instance running for a given process. The company information that uniquely identifies the process are attributes of the process data object.
  
  We know how:
  (1) check if it is already existing instance of the process that gives the information of the company that identifies it
  (2) check that the existing instance is running or completed completed
  
  We want to know if there is no existing API, we can use to achieve the needs above, what are their and where you can find more information of their use.
  
  We tried to look in the documentation of the API which methods might be useful, but we were not able to identify the existing documentation, any one who was able to attend to our needs.
  We have also not found any topic in this forum on this topic.
  
  If possible, please give us some examples of use.
  
  Version: Oracle BPM 11g

  Hello

  In SOA Suite 11 g, you can use the Java API with Composite sensor to achieve this behavior:

  1. first create a composite sensor in the operation to create the composite process instance, during initialization of the sensor with the company information that uniquely identifies the process. This composite sensor can be used to locate the composite instance EM or through the API. See http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/integration.1111/e10224/sca_compsensors.htm#insertedID0 for more information about the creation of Composite sensor

  2. with the help of the Java APIs (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/apirefs.1111/e10659/toc.htm), find the composite instance by the Composite sensor, as explained: http://blogs.oracle.com/soabpm/2009/08/soa_suite_11g_-apipart_3_-_f.html. With a reference to the composite instance, you can check its States of internal components.

  The following libraries must be imported in your java project:
  - /oracle_common/modules/oracle.fabriccommon_11.1.1/fabric-common.jar
  - /oracle_common/soa/modules/oracle.soa.mgmt_11.1.1/soa-infra-mgmt.jar
  - /wlserver_10.3/server/lib/weblogic.jar
  - /oss_11gr1/soa/modules/oracle.soa.fabric_11.1.1/oracle-soa-client-api.jar
  - /oracle_common/webservices/wsclient_extended.jar

  I hope this can help.

  Kind regards
  Rafael