Review of best design OBIEE

Similar Questions

• Best design solution VPN for Central/branches

  Hi all

  I would like your comments on the design of a VPN account solution required the following:

  Right now, the customer has a single office. I will be putting in place of a Cisco 1811w for them, and its main functions will be wireless, firewall with CBAC and EZVPN server access.

  Server EZVPN function will be carried out so that employees with laptops can work from home.

  In the near future, there will be about 4 branches in operation.

  Static IP address is available for the main office, but I'm not sure if the static IP will be available for the office once they are established (there are 50 / 50 chance).

  There will be an Active Directory server in the central location and will be accessible from the branches.

  My question is - given the uncertainty in the branches having a static IP - what is the best way to implement the VPN to connect them to the branch?

  Each branch will have an installed Cisco 831.

  Is EZVPN a viable, given the above requirements?

  Is it possible to put in place the 831 as customers without XAUTH EZVPN, all keeping XAUTH for employees using EZVPN clients?

  If this does not work, XAUTH might have to.

  Or, given the situation, you would opt for DMVPN... Unfortunately I do not know too much about it as the technology for now... What are the advantages / disadvantages of its use, if it is an appropriate solution to this scenario?

  Thank you all in advance for your comments!

  Sean

  I think that you need to use a mode of expansion of network (configured in the vpngroup) instead of client mode. Just make sure that each office uses a different and not overlapping address space.

• Best Design with 8 (4 x1GB + 4 10GB) physical network interface cards

  I'm about to deploy a new vSphere 5.1 (Enterprise license) environment and would appreciate a lot a little comments to some best practices and real-world experiences. For our cluster HA, we will use Dell R720 with Broadcom 5720 girls cards four ports 1 and 2 Intel X 520 DA connection to a Dell EqualLogic SAN PS6110XV (using the Extension Module from Dell for MPIO Multipathing).

  (Note: the iSCSI network will use two switches Dell PC8024F and the 'public' network will have two switches Juniper EX3300).

  I need to design best perf for HA, iSCSI, vMotion, and I would like to know tips for this design. Pls help me!

  Nice piece of Kendrick on this same track.

  Really a lot of ways to skin the cat

  http://www.kendrickcoleman.com/index.php/tech-blog/VMware-vSphere-5-host-NIC-network-design-layout-and-vswitch-configuration-major-update.htm

• Best design

  Hi people,
  
  Can I ask that you more experienced me, which would have the best performance?
  
  I have a controller with 2 channels, 8 discs.
  
  Option a is:
  
  RAID10 with 4 disks in channel 1
  RAID10 with 4 disks in channel 2
  
  option b
  
  Get a RAID10 with all 8 disks on both channels...
  
  I think to take a report based on my snapshots, see the files that have the most of IO and separate in these 2 RAID10, choosing this way, the option.
  
  Have you guys any consideration?
  
  TKS a lot

  After my experience, most records on a single stire will give you the best performance.

  Your application / database are intensive writing?

  ASM will offer better performance - use it on a strip that contains all disks.

  Oded
  [www.dbsnaps.com]
  [www.orbiumsoftware.com]

• Graphic design OBIEE

  Hello everyone,

  I need to put two graphs side by side. These graphics are created in the analysis of the samle set. Here is the figure;

  However, there is an empty huge btw these graphs. How can I do more closely?  I tried width, height, characteristic of dash, but they do not work:)

  Please help me.

  

  Hello

  place a static text between the 2 graphs view and add the HTML span tag with no display.

  Thank you

  Prasanna

• Best design for the use of 8 physical network interface cards on a 5.1 ESXi host

  I have 8 physical network cards to work with on and 5.1 ESXi host using Enterprise Plus license.  I need to repair the following traffic:

  Management traffic

  vMotion traffic

  Virtual machine traffic (probably 2 natachasery will suffice for this)

  NFS traffic

  Won't fault tolerance.  Natachasery-how much should I dedicate to NFS, vMotion, and traffic management?  What failover policy I should use (active / active) (active / standby) for each?

  It is business more licensing and vSphere distributed switches are used.

  Thank you

  Yes, I would put the backup in the switch as well as management traffic and vMotion is they use vSS or vDS. The other option would be to reduce your vDS for NFS traffic of 4 natachasery 2 natachasery and then or to add to the existing vDS that contains management and vMotion VM traffic to add it extra bandwidth or create a new vDS with these 2 natachasery. But at the point of my original thought around creating a vDS is based on all of my bandwidth throwing together and then cut it but I want it and do not have to trade around natachasery after the fact. But there are so many different ways to achieve that is the fun part.

• INTERFACE design - what is the best way to allow the user to define a kind of infusion at various times (non-periodic)?

  I want to allow the user to specify a curve like this:

  

  Such as some under - VI shows the A2 value when a variable of time is between R1, A1 when the time variable is between A2 and A3 when time is in the range A3.

  My design looks like this:

  

  With the error checking that looks like this:

  My question is, is the approach of the table according to optimal? Otherwise, how could combat this?

  I think I can summarize the conversation on this point as a response to the original question (what is the best way...) -to start writing code, to think about what you want to accomplish and write it down (otherwise known as 'Write the first Documentation').  One of the points of a good User Interface is that it is not allow users to "stupid mistakes" - it leads the user "by hand", limiting the entries to the "legal values" and demanding that the entries be made logically.

  If you were going to have a list of Infusions to enter, it is therefore logical to decide or not to enter into time intervals (which are always > 0) or order the times (which, logically) are still growing.  You can (and should) decide that you (or you may have a control that allows the user decide, but maybe it's too flexible) and then apply your "rules".

  Let's say you've decided on "Intervals" (which seems to me to be more User Friendly).  After the user has entered the intervals (and you've provided a nice plot of perfusion vs. time), pouvez allow you the user to an interval of 'split', 'Delete' an interval, or "Edit the Infusion" interval, or you can decide to have a choice more simple "accept or start again" - If you have only a few intervals, the last would be the simplest (and therefore best) design choice.

  Spend more time thinking before coding usually pays Big dividends!

  (Speaking of sad experience) Bob Schor

• What happened to the 2013 DELL Inspiron 7537 Design?

  Hello world
  I'm a big user of DELL and I bought a laptop DELL 15-7537 model in 2013. I think it was the best Design that DELL made at this time on the market, with regard to the case of aluminium, of beauty and performance. A real competitor to the Apple brand is overrated.

  

  I did not follow DELL for some time now, but I noticed today that the new model of DELL Inspiron 2016 is really * in terms of design. In my opinion a great stage of the line DELL 7537.

  Does anyone know what the * happened? Why DELL has such a beautiful design as the 7537? They will change in the future? They plan all new designs for 2016/2017?

  Your opinion/knowledge is appreciated in advance. Thanx.

  ST3VE88

  Doubt that Dell will release this information.

  I have the same processor Intel i5 Inspiron, 7537 purchased in 2013 and agree with you that it is one of the best designs of Dell.

  The only thing I could find wrong, is that the laptop has a motherboard BGA, which does not allow the processor to upgrade, unless the motherboard is also replaced.

  So far the phone has worked without problem, I upgraded to win 10 and for a 512 GB SSD hard drive

  Bev.

• Design of CPU: cucm + remote site

  Hi all

  Now, our company have a HQ Office and a remote site in a different city and we have a CUCM 5.1.3 server in the HQ Office, remote site have approximately 30 cisco 7911 phones registered to the HQ CUCM server. HQ and remote control have their own local voice gateway 2821 h323 (HQ has a PVDM2-64 in VG, remote control has a PVDM2-32 in VG) HQ and distance of telephone calls using the G729 codec to save bandwidth (there is a line of rental of 2 M between the seat and the remote site).

  My question is: HQ Office take often together 8 partners (using MeetMe), because we have no meeting place, server or other device cisco PVDM2 only, so I have to renounce material use CFB, but software CFB support only of the G711 codec and the QUEUE to the HQ router do support G711, if I keep using G729 between Headquarters and remote site Remote staff can not dial a MeetMe meeting and cannot get their voicemail.  Who can tell me what is the best design for my CPU?

  

  Hello

  Throw on this diagram.

  Figure 2-14 centralized resources for media in: -.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/solutions/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns656/net_design_guidance0900aecd80488134.PDF

  The transcoder on CUCM site should be in the MRGLs for phones ip at the remote site.

  HTH

  Alex

  Please note the useful messages

• question of program design

  Hi, I'm working on my first blackberry and I'm running difficulties with my design decision, so I hope someone could clarify.

  Every time I have airs in .net, I would use the MVC pattern. My will would execute a custom event defined in the regulator and I think could capture this event. However, I don't know how I can do this for blackberry. I have a text in my view field and a class that extends buttonfield in the model. I would like to set the button to have some effect on the text field, but I don't know how to get the message without the screen to each button.

  How is this bit?

  Thanks for your help

  Well technically the best design is a Singleton model, but to be honest, I don't know how they actually work. It all depends on how you look at. This global semi variable are not available outside of an instance of your application, and you are not likely to have a large development on a BlackBerry app team, so the chances of your loss of its security program or stability due to the interference is low. I know that experienced programmers and professors who are religious opposition to global variables, but they certainly have their place, and I see no problem with taking advantage of this feature you are proposing. The key thing to remember for the development of BlackBerry, it is that mobile devices are not as powerful as a PC or console. Developers are encouraged to take advantage of multi-threading to maximize efficiency and avoid the garbage collection (in other words, create variables with limited scope that are released from memory. This memory must be systematically freed by the garbage collector). Another good practice is to stick to the condensed syntax (aka shortcut).

  For example:

  If (event) {/ * action * /}

  Instead of...

  If (event == true) {/ * action * /}

  Hope that helps,

  ~ Dom

• How can I design a custom button that has three lines of text in the button itself?

  A matter of design, which is a good implementation of the following? I need to create a custom button that looks like:

   -----------
  | Header    |
  | Subheader |
  | Text      |
   -----------
  

  I know that I can not add a VerticalFieldManager or add any field of a ButtonField, but if I create a custom, button how I would create three lines of text similar to having three LabelFields lined up in a VerticalFieldManager?

  Thank you.

  You can create a focusable multiline field label creation with the bit style FOCUSABLE and with newline characters in its text. It is possible to work a bit like a button field (substitute navigationClick / navigationUnclick to perform the action or, better yet, to call fieldChangeNotify so that you can plug into the field with a FieldChangeListener).

  Use RichTextField rather than LabelField if you want to play with fonts (say, "BOLD" underlined header; italic subheader; normal text).

  If you want rounded corners and other effects, override the paintBackground method or painting of the field (don't forget to call the super.paint, if you go with the latter).

  That being said - that there is no single best design, so feel free to browse the forums (research of "multiline" or "multiline" yields quite a few results) and come up with your own ideas.

• FI/IOM: better design of wiring

  In our UCS system with 2 chassis, we have 2 links between the IOM 2208 and FI 6248:

  For an IOM, what is the best design wiring:

  -connect theIOM to Eth1/1-2

  -connect the IOM to Eth1/1; Eth1/8

  ... On average, it is preferable to use the same Unified Port Controller (UPC) ASIC [called Carmel, I think only] or use 2 different UPC?

  and why?

  THX.

  Nicolas.

  The 6200 and 2208 the best design option is actually to ensure all the server bindings (FI <->IOM) are related to the SAME UPC (carmel ASIC).  This will give you the number alive at the system max.  By spreading your connections through different UPCs may increase redundancy, but it will decrease your bright max County at the same time.

  If you want to see UPC mapping, you can connect to the CLI, connect to the NXOS context and run the following command:

  FI-A-6248-A (nxos) # display all-hardware ports internal carmel

  News Port of Carmel:

  name | Journal | Auto | Mac | flag | SMA | Opr | m:s:l | IPT | Fab | xcar | xpt | if_index | diag | ucVer

  -------+---+---+---+----+---+---+-----+---+---+----+---+--------+----+-----

  xgb1/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | B7 | tell | DN | 0:0:f | 0 | 92. 0 | 0 | 1A 000000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/2 | 1. 0 | 1 | B7 | tell | DN | 1:1:f | 1. 88. 0 | 0 | 1A 001000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/3 | 2. 0 | 2 | B7 | tell | DN | 2:2:f | 2. 93. 0 | 0 | 1A 002000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/4 | 3. 0 | 3 | B7 | tell | DN | 3:3:f | 3. 89. 0 | 0 | 1A 003000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/5 | 4. 0 | 4 | B7 | tell | DN | 4:4:f | 4. 90. 0 | 0 | 1A 004000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/6 | 5. 0 | 5 | B7 | tell | DN | 5:5:f | 5. 94. 0 | 0 | 1A 005000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/7 | 6. 0 | 6 | B7 | tell | DN | 6:6:f | 6. 95. 0 | 0 | 1A 006000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/8 | 7. 0 | 7 | B7 | tell | DN | 7:7:f | 7. 91. 0 | 0 | 1A 007000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/9 | 8. 1. 0 | B7 | tell | DN | 0:0:f | 0 | 80. 0 | 0 | 1A 008000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/10 | 9. 1. 1 | B7 | tell | DN | 1:1:f | 1. 87. 0 | 0 | 1A 009000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/11 | 10. 1. 2 p | B7 | en | up | 2:2:f | 2. 81. 0 | 0 | 1a00a000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/12 | 11. 1. 3 P | B7 | en | up | 3:3:f | 3. 86. 0 | 0 | 1a00b000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/13 | 12. 1. 4 P | B7 | en | up | 4:4:f | 4. 82. 0 | 0 | 1a00c000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/14 | 13. 1. 5 p | B7 | en | up | 5:5:f | 5. 85. 0 | 0 | 1a00d000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/15 | 14. 1. 6 P | B7 | en | up | 6:6:f | 6. 83. 0 | 0 | 1a00e000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/16 | 15. 1. 7 p | B7 | en | up | 7:7:f | 7. 84. 0 | 0 | 1a00f000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/17 | 16. 2. 0 p | B7 | en | up | 0:0:f | 0 | 75. 0 | 0 | 1A 010000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/18 | 17. 2. 1 | B7 | tell | DN | 1:1:f | 1. 76. 0 | 0 | 1A 011000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/19 | 18. 2. 2 | B7 | tell | DN | 2:2:f | 2. 74. 0 | 0 | 1A 012000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/20 | 19. 2. 3 | B7 | tell | DN | 3:3:f | 3. 77. 0 | 0 | 1A 013000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/21 | 20. 2. 4 | B7 | tell | DN | 4:4:f | 4. 78. 0 | 0 | 1A 014000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/22 | 21. 2. 5 | B7 | tell | DN | 5:5:f | 5. 73. 0 | 0 | 1A 015000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/23 | 22. 2. 6 | B7 | tell | DN | 6:6:f | 6. 72. 0 | 0 | 1A 016000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/24 | 23. 2. 7 | B7 | tell | DN | 7:7:f | 7. 79. 0 | 0 | 1A 017000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/25 | 24. 3. 0 | B7 | tell | DN | 0:0:f | 0 | 71. 0 | 0 | 1A 018000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/26 | 25. 3. 1 | B7 | tell | DN | 1:1:f | 1. 64. 0 | 0 | 1A 019000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/27 | 26. 3. 2 | B7 | tell | DN | 2:2:f | 2. 65. 0 | 0 | 1a01a000 | pass | 0.00

  xgb1/28 | 27. 3. 3 | B7 | tell | DN | 3:3:f | 3. 70. 0 | 0 | 1a01b000 | pass | 0.00

  29/MFC1 | 28. 3. 4 | B7 | tell | DN | 4:4:0 | 4. 66. 0 | 0 | 0101 c 000 | pass | 0.00

  MFC1/30 | 29. 3. 5 | B7 | tell | DN | 5:5:1. 5. 69. 0 | 0 | 0101 d 000 | pass | 0.00

  MFC1/31 | 30. 3. 6 | B7 | tell | DN | 6:6:2 | 6. 67. 0 | 0 | 0101e000 | pass | 0.00

  MFC1/32 | 31. 3. 7 | B7 | tell | DN | 7:7:3. 7. 68. 0 | 0 | 0101f000 | pass | 0.00

  sup0 | 32. 4. 4 | B7 | en | DN | 4:4:0 | 4. 62. 0 | 0 | 15020000 | pass | 0.00

  sup1 | 33. 4. 5 | B7 | en | DN | 5:5:1. 5. 59. 0 | 0 | 15010000 | pass | 0.00

  The column with what you fear is a labeled "car" (carmel).  As you can probably see the first column corresponds to the Interface.

  FYI - I have yet to see a controller failing port ASIC.  Its MTBF is well beyond many other components including SPFS, cables, etc.  I don't sweat worrying about redundancy of ASIC level in this regard.

  Kind regards

  Robert

• Question of design around VSAN

  We left the Nexus 5 K for our CF to switching to start our UCS blades. I wonder what the best design is for the following situation.

  Active / Active NetApp HA pair.

  FC 2 ports target of each head of NetApp in the HA pair to the SAN (Nexus 5 K in our case) switches.

  1 port of each head of NetApp to each of the 5010 s nexus.

  Should I 1 VSAN on each 5010 with each head of NetApp in there or should I have 1 common VSAN between the 5010 s?

  Any comments on this would be appreciated.

  A recommended good is to use different numbering on each fabric VSAN.

  Fabric (or 1) odd numbered VSAN use (3, 5, etc.)

  Fabric B (or 2) use even mumbered VSAN (2, 4, etc.)

  It provides a visual cue for the operator to let them know what fabric, they make changes. In addition, in the case of inadvertence ISL to connect between the two fabrics that you merge your A and B fabric zonesets (I saw it happen). Do not "put any active trading in VSAN 1 for the same reason.

• What is the new Oracle exame which just showed on view Pearson today called - review: 1Z1-006: foundations of Oracle database?

  
  Hello

  I just saw a new beta review show today (Thursday, 23 April) on Pearson view called

  Foundations of 1Z1-006 Oracle database?

  Is this an OCA, OCP, OCÉ, or OCS?

  Is this review for teaching?

  Is this review for the design.

  Help me

  Roger

  Interesting - looks like a completely new class of certification: certified Junior Associate - OCJA.?

  Oracle database foundations | Oracle Certification exam

• Best practices for Architecture of the SOA suite domain

  Hello

  What is the best design of cluster for Oracle soa Suite of BAM and OSB Pentecost?

  I think so

  1 cluster for servers in the osb

  1 cluster for servers in soa

  1 bam_server

  or

  single cluster server soa and osb

  What is the best solution?

  The reference topology is separated clusters of weblogic for soa, osb, and bam... Take a look at the Enterprise Deployment Guide...

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E28280_01/core.1111/e12036/TOC.htm

  Look...

  Expand the field of SOA components

  Extend a SOA to Oracle Service Bus domain

  Extension of the scope to include BAM

  See you soon,.

  Vlad