RV042 VPN devices and iOS4.2

Hello

I have problems with the VPN between RV042 and iOS4.2 devices (iPhone/iPad).

First question is ' is it possible at all the.

Second question is 'how '.

--

I configured the tunnel group and created for the VPN user. In my Windows XP-laptop QuickVPN seems to work very well.

But when I try to connect with iPhone or iPad (3G) I'll get a message like "the server is not responding.

RV042 journal, I found the following lines:

Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Initial message of aggressive Mode [iOS_device_public_IP], but no (wildcard) connection has been configured
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log [Tunnel negotiation of Info]< responder="" received="" aggressive="" mode="" 1st="" packet="">
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Useful load of Vendor ID received Type = [Dead Peer Detection]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Ignorant Vendor ID payload Type = [Cisco-unit]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Ignorant Vendor ID payload Type = [XAUTH]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Vendor ID payload ignorant Type = [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Vendor ID payload ignorant Type = [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Payload Vendor ID received Type = [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Regardless of the Vendor ID payload [9909b64eed937c65...]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Regardless of the Vendor ID payload [80d0bb3def54565e...]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Regardless of the Vendor ID payload [4d1e0e136deafa34...]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Regardless of the Vendor ID payload [439b59f8ba676c4c...]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Regardless of the Vendor ID payload [8f8d83826d246b6f...]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Regardless of the Vendor ID payload [4df37928e9fc4fd1...]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Regardless of the Vendor ID payload [4a131c8107035845...]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Regardless of the Vendor ID payload [4a131c8107035845...]
Dec 10 13:09:29 2010 The VPN log Regardless of the Vendor ID payload [4a131c8107035845...]

Any ideas what's happening?

RV042 does not support the iPhone VPN connection.

Here is the list of what iPhone supports:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/vpn_client/cisco_vpn_client/iPhone/2.0/connectivity/guide/iPhone.html

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Cisco RV042 VPN hub and spokes, connecting spokes question

    Hello

    I have a few Cisco RV042 router and VPN links them with a hub and spoke topology.

    Each speaks VPN works, they manage to connect to the platform.

    The hub can see each VPN active rays.

    A computer under the hub can connect to a computer in any talks.

    A computer under any talks can connect to a computer running the hub.

    Which works very well.

    Now, what I really need, is to connect computers under a RADIUS to connect to computers under another spoke.

    It don't work.

    Current configuration of LAN:

    HUB IP / mask: 192.168.0.1 / 255.255.255.0

    Spoke1 IP / mask: 192.168.1.1 / 255.255.255.0

    Spoke2 IP / mask: 192.168.2.1 / 255.255.255.0

    I was wondering if the Cisco RV042 can be configured to allow that and HOW?

    If we can not do, should what other router I use as a hub? Should I change the rays as well?

    Thank you and have a nice day

    Hope that this document can point you the right direction.

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-12534

  • Router RV042 VPN Client access from Linux?

    Hello world!

    I have a question for the creators and users of RV042.

    Is there a way to communicate with a Linux box for access on a RV042 VPN client? I'm trying to do that and play with the settings, but I am not able to connect. I tried profiles in OpenVPN, OpenSwan, kVPNc and others. For the most part, my problem is that all of these software require too many parameters and other certificates that only types that you can create on a RV042 (.pem files).

    Please let me know if any of you were able to connect to a Linux box for on a RV042 VPN.

    Also, I would ask the CISCO/Linksys people why they provide only a Windows client for this option? "Small companies" are devices not windows based commercial devices!

    Thank you!

    Zoli

    Good day Zoli,

    Unfortunately, there is not any Quickvpn client available for Linux and Macintosh which work together with the Small Business/Small Business routers Pro.

    If I share your dismay that we do not formally use Quickvpn with all Linux distributions or any Mac OS, we have seen limited success with solutions that allow the use of third party VPN Clients when used in conjunction with our routers.

    I'm curious to know whether or not you have explored Shrew Soft VPN Client (a simple Google search will yield results). I'm currently taking a look and to experiment a little bit on my end to see if there is anything we can get to work. If you can, please let me know what you use distribution, what version and a list of all customers third-party vpn that you used.

    Personally, I'd love to see the development of a guide that we as support engineers to help all of our Linux-savvy customer.

    Thanks for your patience!

  • VPN device through my network home

    I've been racking my brain and read everything I can find, but I can't understand this. I would like to install a Cisco RV180 on my home network to act as a VPN connector to my office network. I can use Windows to connect to a computer of my beautiful PPTP VPN. but I need a few devices to connect to my work network, so I thought I would put them behind a VPN to get connected. I have a large JPG showing what I want to do, but I can not join this post.

    At work, I have a firewall setup FortiGate 200 b with IPSEC phase 1 and Phase2. I want to configure the RV180 to connect to this traffic tunnel and the road between my two devices and my work network. I have everything set up on two of them according to the different tutorials that I found but still no joy.

    Does anyone have experience with this type of installation? If you want to see the diagram, click on HERE.

    Any help you guys can give is greatly appreciated. I'm starting to go bald from all the hair pulling.

    The RV180 is now managed by the Cisco Small Business support community.
    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/community/NetPro/small-business

  • Two RV042 VPN has been a problem to get to the third-party router

    Hello, I have two RV042 connected via VPN very well.    First network let's call A.A.A.A Second network have also RV042 to B.B.B.253.   B.B.B. network, we have Cisco router another provider to B.B.B.254.    On this second network configuration on B.B.B.253 (our default gateway) saying that all traffic will C.C.C.C I have routing tables (just an IP address not a subnet) must pass through the router Cisco at B.B.B.254 and the location of B.B.B.B works well.

    What I'm trying to accomplish, is the unique through the RV042 VPN network A.A.A.A than when I go to C.C.C.C of IP address and get passed out through B.B.B.254 (Cisco of the seller).   I had the seller put the roads in their router to be able to deliver the A.A.A.A network and can ping on both networks.   Specifically, I can ping from A.A.A.A to B.B.B.254.   However, I would like to install my on A.A.A.A routing tables so that whenever someone goes to the unique address of C.C.C.C it passed through the VPN to the B.B.B.254.   All my efforts have failed.   I do not exclude the seller screwed up somewhere, but have been working on this all day and am running out of ideas.  It's for all the suggestions and thanks for any help!

    Concerning

    It is not possible. The RV042 using a simple IPSec VPN Tunnel tunnel. Plain IPSec has routable interfaces. You cannot add static routes to handle additional traffic through the tunnel. IPSec will be tunnel only traffic that matches local & remote security groups. Because C.C.C.C is not part of a security group that he will not get in the tunnel.

  • Customer quick RV042 VPN cannot ping lan network

    Hi guys,.

    I just created a client2gateway on RV042 IPSec tunnel and use the remote PC quick VPN client tries to connect to this router.

    Fast VPN showed that the tunnel has been established. But I couldn't ping the LAN behind the router RV042.

    Can someone help me?

    Thank you.

    Hello

    Yes, you are right. To use the fast with RV042 VPN, it is necessary to configure the user name and a password for access to the VPN Client page. As this router does not support VLANs, you can only connect the VPN client to the LAN subnet (you cannot connect the client to any beach IP configured with multiple subnets)

    Kind regards

    Bismuth

  • Send all VPN traffic and the other end it blocks Internet

    Hello

    I wonder if I can get a RV042 VPN Tunnel to a RV082 and in the RV082 block all traffic on the internet that comes form the computers that are behind the RV042.

    Something like this:

    Remote PC-> RV042-> VPN-> RV082-> firewall RV082 (block internet traffic, allow intranet traffic)

    Thank you very much

    Oliver

    The scenario you describe should be doable with a pair of RV042 and RV082, where all traffic is transmitted by RV042 to RV082. What you need is to configure an access on RV082 rule to deny the RV042 subnet HTTP traffic to ALL (internet).

  • RV042 VPN configuration

    I'm looking for help to the RV042 configuration for VPN access to local machines and Win 2008 Server.  History: had problems with remote printers created for customers log into old Linksys RV042 VPN Linksys software.  First Tech exposed server without security, and it had to be removed because he was attacked, but did not print problem.  2nd tech failed to get VPN to work after 1 tech.  3rd tech 4hours and I got the router is a piece of...  I am so on more than 1000 and unable to have a simple router put in place.  The current situation.  New RV042 with the V4.1.1.01 firmware, using the Cisco VPN client 5.0.07.0410, most of the 32-bit machines on network XP, a 64-bit win 7.  My customers do not have access to their data for too long and I need a quick fix.  Willing to pay, just the person to really know what they are doing.  Thanks in advance.  (I hope its ok to offer to hire someone!)

    Mike,

    I am sorry to hear that you're having these problems and even more sorry to tell you that you have problems with the client VPN Cisco 5.x because the RV042 does not support this VPN client. Cisco VPN client is an enterprise-level software utility that uses the IPsec protocols to connect. What you should use is Cisco VPN fast. Cisco VPN client authenticates in 2 phases while the RV042 and Cisco Qvpn authenticates in 1 phase. The router doesn't understand just how to manage connections from the Cisco VPN client. I've included a link to the Cisco Qvpn utility below. Hope this helps

    http://www.Cisco.com/Cisco/software/release.html?mdfid=282414010&softwareid=282465795&release=1.4.2.1&relind=available&rellifecycle=&RelType=latest

    Blake Wright

    HWC Cisco network engineer

  • NAT VPN tunnel and still access Internet traffic

    Hello

    Thank you in advance for any help you can provide.

    I have a server with the IP 192.168.1.9 that needs to access a subnet remote from 192.168.50.0/24, through the Internet.  However, before the server can access the remote subnet, the server IP must be NAT'ed to 10.1.0.1 because the VPN gateway remote (which is not under my control) allows access to other customers who have the same subnet address that we do on our local network.

    We have a 2801 Cisco (running c2801-advsecurityk9 - mz.124 - 15.T9.bin) set up to make the NAT.  It is the only gateway on our network.

    I have configured the Cisco 2801 with the following statements of NAT and the relevant access lists:

    access-list 106 allow host ip 192.168.1.9 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255

    NAT extended IP access list
    refuse the host ip 192.168.1.9 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255
    deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
    ip permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

    route allowed ISP 10 map
    corresponds to the IP NAT

    IP nat EMDVPN 10.1.0.1 pool 10.1.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
    IP nat inside source list 106 pool EMDVPN
    IP nat inside source map route ISP interface FastEthernet0/1 overload

    When the server (192.168.1.9) attempts to ping on the subnet of 192.168.50.0/24 devices, the VPN tunnel is established successfully.  However, after that, the server is no longer able to access the Internet because the NAT translation for 192.168.1.9 has changed since the external IP address of the router (FastEthernet0/1) at 10.1.0.1.

    The documentation I've seen on the site of Cisco says that this type of Setup allows only host subnet communication.  Internet access is not possible.  However, maybe I missed something, or one of you experts can help me.  Is it possible to configure the NAT router traffic destined to the VPN tunnel and still access the Internet by using the dynamic NAT on FastEthernet0/1?

    Once again, thank you for any help you can give.

    Alex

    Hello

    Rather than use a pool for NAT

    192.168.1.9 - 10.1.0.1 > 192.168.50.x

    ACL 102 permit ip 192.168.1.9 host 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255

    RM-STATIC-NAT route map permit 10
    corresponds to the IP 102

    IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.9 10.1.0.1 card expandable RM-STATIC-NAT route

    ACL 101 deny host ip 192.168.1.9 192.168.50.0 0.0.0.255
    ACL 101 by ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
    overload of IP nat inside source list 101 interface FastEthernet0/1

    VPN access list will use the source as 10.1.0.1... *.

    Let me know if it works.

    Concerning

    M

  • How to configure RV042 VPN to use Windows 7 client native IPSec?

    The question is in the title, I want to make the Windows client compatible with my RV042 VPN because Shrew Soft VPN fail to tunel after that little time and QuickVPN do not support Windows 7 or a 64-bit version of Windows.

    Windows does not have an IPSec client, what they offer is a VPN client that can connect to PPTP, L2TP/IPsec (on IPSec), IKEv2. To connect directly to the router RV that our only option is to connect over PPTP once the PPTP server protocol is enabled on the router. If you have a server located behind the router, you can configure to be an endpoint to one of the above types. Don't know why, Mac and Windows don't have a naked IPSec feature built-in clients.

    Some third-party applications to consider:

    Windows: ShrewSoft IPSec Client

    Mac OS X: IPSecuritas

    Both are relative simple to set up and on the routers RV0xx work fantastic and an exellent substitute QVPN. With these applications you set up the tunnel as a group and use the "XP/2000 Microsoft VPN Client ' option." " This option is a bit misleading because it seems to imply that the native VPN client can support IPSec settings, when it referred only that a computer would use this option during its WAN IP address is not always known.

    I hope this helps.

  • 8.3 (1) ASA Cisco VPN Client and IP Communicator - one-way communication

    Community salvation.

    I have a strange problem with my setup and I'm sure it's either some type of routing (or NAT) or just missing one rule allows traffic. But I'm now at a point where I would like to ask your help.

    I have a few users remote access that have the Cisco IP Communicator (CICC) application installed on their laptops. So:

    The VPN with CPIC user <> ASA Firewall <> router voice <> MAC <> IP phone

    The VPN works fine for all other traffic. The connection of basis for the IP Communicator works well. He get is connected to the CallManager, is shown as registered and you can even call an internal phone and also external phones. BUT: while you can hear the called party (if the phone internal) it does not work for the other direction. There is no sound from the remote/appellant.

    I already understood that it is also not possible to ping from the phone VPN to the internal subnet IP phone. While the VPN user can ping any other device in the network internal, he cannot do for Cisco IP phones. But if the VPN phone calls a phone no-internal (mobile...) - it works!

    My thought is that the call cannot be build up properly between the VPN phone and the internal phone.

    I found similar situations with google, but they are all for the reverse: call for internal works, but not for VPN.

    What do you think?

    Hello

    Usually ASA lists specific to the customer networks VPN Split Tunnel runs.

    This would mean that there is a Split Tunnel ACL used in configurations of the SAA for this VPN connection that needs to have the missing network added to the VPN connection traffic.

    -Jouni

  • VPN Hub and Spoke with NAT

    Hello! I have a VPN network star topology, I need configuration for our customers to access. I have 3 points of endpoint in this example: VPN, Pix 515e and Linksys RV042 hub. The hub is the site of our parent company, the Pix 515e is our data center and the RV042 is at the customer's site. What I currently have is a VPN connection between our Pix 515e and the hub, and another between our Pix 515e and the RV042 VPN. What I need is for the server on the client (RV042) site to talk to the hub network via our Pix 515e. I also need to be coordinated traffic so it looks like it's from the same subnet on our Pix 515e to the hub.

    Hub (MEAN): 10.1.6.x

    PIX 515e (HUB): 172.16.3.x

    RV042 (SPOKEN): 192.168.71.x

    PIX 515e (HUB):

    Outside - 12.34.56.78

    Interior - 172.16.1.1

    Hub (TALK):

    Outside - 87.65.43.21

    Interior - 10.1.6.1

    RV042 (SPOKEN):

    Outside - 150.150.150.150

    Interior - 192.168.71.1

    The hub allows all traffic to my Pix 515e on subnet 172.16.3.x and vice versa. The RV042 allows all traffic from 172.16.3.x to talk to 192.168.71.x and vice versa. I need to get 192.168.71.5 on RV042 network 10.1.6.x the network hub through the Pix 515e and make it look like its 172.16.3.71 entry. So I need NAT traffic in the tunnel to another tunnel. Attached config running under the direction of privacy. Any help is greatly appreciated.

    On PIX you need a static policy statement,

    NAT list allowed access host ip 192.168.71.5 10.1.6.0 255.255.255.0

    public static 172.16.3.71 (external, outside) 192.168.71.5 nat access list

    And modify the ACL of appropriately crypto to include natted address.

  • I installed it on a new computer and my password would not work to connect, now I can not connect on any of my devices and reset email does not get sent?

    I have a new computer. I installed the beta version. I run beta 2 other computers a Tablet and my phone. He taught me that I needed to separate other devices and try again. My credentials will not work and a reset email hasn't shipped yet. I would get my devices connected and connected again. If this is not possible I reluctantly will go back to explore. Mozilla has been so easy to use so far? Very frustrating.

    Hi bizebill,
    Thank you for your question. I understand that you want to synchronize all your devices. Please make sure that all the devices are updated at least at version 29.
    If you were on a version before that, you need to set up a new email and the password with the new synchronization.

    I hope this helps.

  • I created a my page book epub file, and it works perfectly in ibooks. But it does not appear on my other devices, and the .epub file cannot be successfully sent by e-mail. 5.6.2, iBook 1.5 pages

    I created a my page book epub file, and it works perfectly in iBooks. But it does not appear on my other devices, and the .epub file cannot be successfully sent by e-mail. 5.6.2, iBook 1.5 pages

    What's not?

    You must check the iBooks category in your OS X system preferences: Panel iCloud: iCloud Drive: Options: Documents Panel. On iOS, you must have enabled to iCloud and in the iCloud Drive location setting iBooks. Also, in iOS parameters: iTunes and App Store, ensure that iBooks is running.

    The iBook.epub file is a compressed/compressed and renamed folder that represents a single file to any email client. What do you mean, it cannot be sent correctly - and it's your experience, send, or the failure of the recipient to view the ePub document? What email client?

  • For days now, my iPad Air insisted on the fact that it cannot connect to iTunes. Wifi works fine for applications and devices, and I tried all the options on the support page. Nothing has worked. What should I do?

    The time zone is correct, it is signed through "iCloud" in the settings and all the apps work relatively well, including those who are in need of the internet, so the problem is not the internet. However, the Air iPad is more connect to iTunes, it is impossible to update anything. It won't let me reconnect through 'iTunes and App Store' in settings, just tell me that it can't connect to iTunes everytime I try it. I also noticed that Game Center is strange, his page in settings will not be same load and he often delay signing in when I open an application compatible with it. My iOS is updated to 9.3.1. The only thing I can think is that I had to change my password recently, but he had me to login with the new password on the device, and this problem did not show up a few days later. I am at a loss on what to do at this point, and I already tried all suggested fixes Apple support. Are there patches less known who could solve this problem? Or, is this a widespread problem that apple is having this time with their servers?

    Hi TimeSeerStudios

    I don't see the failure:

    https://www.Apple.com/support/SystemStatus/

    Have you tried to close all applications and restart force (hold down the sleep/wake and Home buttons and do not let go until the screen darkens and the Apple logo appears)?

Maybe you are looking for