RV180 VPN problem

Similar Questions

• VPN from Site to Site RV325 to RV180 connection problems

  Hi all

  I am new to VPN and networking, please be patient with me.

  I recently bought a RV325 and a RV180 to create a site to site VPN Ipsec tunnel. I was not able to establish a connection between the two. I don't know that this is a setting that I have hurt or something on my part. I would be extremely grateful to anyone who can help me with this!

  I've attached screenshots of the two router... As I'm not sure what you guys would like to see.  If there is no specific details please ask and I'll give you.

  Thank you very much!

  Hello and thank you for the detailed information.

  I checked the configuration on both routers and found a few issues:

  First and the most important is the fact that on the two router WAN PII addresses use private IP by far. On the RV180W you 192.168.1.33 and you use on the 192.168.0.104 RV325.

  It's a big problem because it's showing that you're behind another router, which is the device that made the public IP address that you are trying to connect.

  To resolve this problem, you must call the ISP on both ends and ask them to change the modem in Bridge mode, that way the real public IP address will be assigned to the WAN 1 port on routers and you will be able to connect.

  The second problem I found is that, on the side of RV325, your LAN and WAN IP addresses are on the same subnet 192.168.0.x. Now, this problem will be solved once the modem is changed to the bridge, so nothing to change mode.

  Finally, I noticed that on the VPN configuration you use the 192.168.1.0 as the subnet for the RV180W, when, according to your screenshots, the actual LAN of the RV180W subnet is 192.168.2.1.

  One last thing is that I will recommend to disable the aggressive mode on each side of the VPN as opposed to have it turned on on both sides.

  I hope this helps!

• RV180 WAN/Internet very slow speed via WAP4410n (Port RV180 speed problem)?

  Hello

  I have a base set up on the RV180, no etc. VPN running 1.0.5.4 Firmware (latest) and use a browser of WAP WAP4410n plugged into a LAN of the RV180 port. I have a SG100D Gigabit Switch also connected to a port RV180. My WiMax ISP provides 12 MB.

  When I leave speed Port on the RV180 & WAP4410n on Auto neg. They hook at 1 GB and I have ONLY 2 MB Internet speed on wireless clients with no reported ignored packets on each device, when I change the port to 100 MB on the WAP4410n Rx. speed speed is normal at 12 MB!  The RV180 also indicates the speed of the LAN port for 1 GB... it is obviously wrong!  Obviously, forced to run the LAN of WAP port to 100 MB so I can get the ISP... normal speeds is limitation all my wireless to wired LAN traffic (and vice versa).

  I tried several configs RV180 ie. Simplified of bare bones, exchanged cat 5th etc. etc. WITHOUT change.  With another router, there is no problem with the port of WAP4410N at 1 GB and ISP speeds are normal. ISP speeds are also normal via the Gigabit switch to other boxes, BUT if I plug the WAP4410N in switch WAN speed is 2 MB if the WAP4410N is set to 1 GB port speed!

  With the RV180 unable to define a manual port 100 MB speed (see 1.0.5.4 Firmware release notes), that strongly leads me to believe that it is a problem of data Port RV180 specific WAP WAP4410N somehow.

  Their are many positions reports slow Internet with the RV180, but none of them have a solution.  Ideas, any help would be greatly appreciated that Ive lost too much time already trying to solve this router ÷ # $$ / / / &. As this is my first post I hope I posted in the appropriate forum.

  Thank you... Rob.

  Thank you for the update.

• RV180 VPN connects and allows you to browse the files, but falls when opening a file.

  Last week, we received our 300Mbps fiber connection. We bought the RV180 due to its high performance, and he manages the speed perfectly.

  However, when you set up VPN, I encountered a strange problem.

  Establishing a QuickVpn or PPTP is simple and connection is no problem. But I'll be fine. I can communicate with QuickVpn or PPTP and find a NAS or PC directory structure, but when I try to open a file the VPC connection drops.

  I activate the remote management.
  I can ping google.com f-l 1472 without fragmentation, so a WAN MTU of 1500 should be ok.
  I have tried disabling attack prevention firewall.

  I have install the following experience: the firmware update (1.0.2.6), restore the default settings.

  Set up the RV180 as follows:

  IPv4 WAN (Internet)

  ------------------------------------------------------------------

  Internet connection type: Automatic Configuration - DHCP

  DNS Server Source: Get dynamically for ISP

  MAC address of the router: use the default address

  IPv4 LAN (local area network)

  ------------------------------------------------------------------

  Host name: RV180

  IP address: 192.168.75.1

  Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0

  Mode DHCP: DHCP Server

  Domain name: LCDVT

  From the IP address: 192.168.75.100

  End IP address: 192.168.75.254

  Rental time: 24

  DNS Proxy: enable

  Preventing attacks

  ------------------------------------------------------------------

  WAN (Internet) security controls

  Meet Ping on WAN (Internet): disabled

  Stealth mode: disabled

  Floods: disabled

  LAN (local area network) security controls

  Block UDP Flood: disabled

  Parameters of the ICSA

  Block the anonymous ICMP Messages: disabled

  Block fragmented packets: disabled

  Block multicast packets: disabled

  VPN users

  ------------------------------------------------------------------

  PPTP server: enabled

  From the IP address: 192.168.75.50

  End IP address: 192.168.75.99

  Table setting VPN Client:

  ---------------------------

  No: 1

  Enabled: enabled

  Username: lcdvt

  Password: *.

  Allow the user to change the password: NA

  Protocol: PPTP

  Web access

  ------------------------------------------------------------------

  Access on the LAN of HTTPS Web Interface: enabled

  Remote management: enabled

  Type of access: IP range

  Start of range: 192.168.75.1

  End of series: 192.168.75.254

  Port number: 443

  Remote SNMP: disabled

  The rest of the menu options are, except for logging policies where I have everything turned on by default.

  In this experiment, I connect from a remote location, start navigating among directories of the drive without any problems and then open a file, after which the VPN connection falls (or some process breaks down). After the transfer of a few 100 KB blocks the VPN connection.

  Error logs

  ------------------------------------------------------------------

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:18 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] nimfNetIfaceTblHandler [System] [NIMF]: could not get LedPinId

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:25 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] IP: 62.45.238.236

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:25 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] BCAST: 62.45.239.255

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:25 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] subnet: 255.255.254.0

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:25 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] GW: 62.45.238.1

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:25 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] DNS1: 62.45.45.45

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:25 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] DNS2: 62.45.46.46

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:25 2013 (GMT + 0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] Interface: eth1

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:32 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] nimfNetIfaceTblHandler [System] [NIMF]: could not get LedPinId

  Thu Mar 20 00:40:58 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] nimfNetIfaceTblHandler [System] [NIMF]: could not get LedPinId

  Thu Mar 20 00:41:10 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] IP: 62.45.238.236

  Thu Mar 20 00:41:10 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] BCAST: 62.45.239.255

  Thu Mar 20 00:41:10 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] subnet: 255.255.254.0

  Thu Mar 20 00:41:10 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] GW: 62.45.238.1

  Thu Mar 20 00:41:10 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] DNS1: 62.45.45.45

  Thu Mar 20 00:41:10 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] DNS2: 62.45.46.46

  Thu Mar 20 00:41:10 2013 (GMT + 0100) [rv180] [System] [PROGRAM] Interface: eth1

  Thu Mar 20 00:41:19 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] nimfNetIfaceTblHandler [System] [NIMF]: could not get LedPinId

  Warning logs

  ------------------------------------------------------------------

  Thu Mar 20 00:39:13 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [DHCPC] dhcpcDisable: removed dhclient.leases

  Thu Mar 20 00:40:54 2013(GMT+0100) [rv180] [System] [DHCPC] dhcpcDisable: removed dhclient.leases

  Sat 1 Jan 01:02:43 2011 (GMT + 0100) [rv180] [Kernel] [KERNEL] [23.090000] /home/aruns/rv180w/updated_dec19_final/beta-v1/rv180w-common/comps/gpl/ipset/src/ipset/kernel/ip_set.c: ip_set_create: no type set 'nethash', 'setPublicNet' has not created value

  What I am doing wrong? Or the device?

  I am interested in what the solution to these problems.  Research on get a rv180...

  First car of Huntsville and bike e-magazine: www.huntsvillecarscene.com

• RV180 VPN route all internet traffic via IPSec VPN

  Hello

  I install my RV180 to VPN to our headquarters Fortigate 60 C. It works really well

  My only problem is that I don't know how to move internet traffic on our remote site by Headquarters. We want to use this technique so that all sites have the same web content filtering provided by our main Fortigate unit. I see clearly that all traffic destined to our internal network will go trough the VPN tunnel, but internet traffic will go through our modem at the remote site.

  My way of fortigate thinking said that I need a static route to transfer all traffic through the VPN tunnel. I've read elsewhere that I need to set up some sort of ACL.

  Anyone else has any ideas on this / has anyone successfully implemented somehting similar?

  Hi Jared,

  I don't think that RV180 takes complete care of tunneling. Complete tunneling allows you to all your traffic to VPN. RV180 made only split tunneling.

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• VPN problem consumes my life...

  At the Office I have a Server SBS 2011 Premium, cable modem Comcast/SMC 50/10 in the bridge, a NetVanta 3450 with port 1723 transmitted router, the VPN wizard ran over and over, I made the best practices recommendations, the firewall server is disabled, but I can still not log.  Can I VPN in other places of the House.  What Miss me?  The PE Dell R510 is multi-aiguise with 3 NICs, but I use one of them.  Would that be a problem?  Thanks, Craig

  At the Office I have a Server SBS 2011 Premium, cable modem Comcast/SMC 50/10 in the bridge, a NetVanta 3450 with port 1723 transmitted router, the VPN wizard ran over and over, I made the best practices recommendations, the firewall server is disabled, but I can still not log.  Can I VPN in other places of the House.  What Miss me?  The PE Dell R510 is multi-aiguise with 3 NICs, but I use one of them.  Would that be a problem?  Thanks, Craig

  Hi Craig

  Your question is beyond the scope of these level consumer forums. Please ask your question on the following forums.

  TechNet: ITPro - Small Business Server Forum: SBS http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/smallbusinessserver/threads

  Concerning

• [FIXED] VPN problems

  Hello.

  I'm trying to set up a VPN server on my XP machine at home, in order to circumvent the blocks to internet on my school's network. I managed to set up a VPN server on my laptop with WIN7, but I do not run all the time, so I thought it would be more convinient to set up VPN on my old XP computer.

  in any case, I think that I did everything what I'm supposed to. I have forwarded port 1723 in the router and open port 1723 and Protocol 47 (GRE) IP in the firewall. I also chose ports in the internet connection for the VPN properties, which do not mix with the DCHP server on my router.

  However, still, when I try to connect from the network of my school, I get error 800 or 807. Can someone help me? What Miss me?

  OK, so I found what my problem was. The local IP address for my XP computer has been updated with an IP address outside the range of the DHCP server on the router. Once I changed the IP address, forwarded the ports to the new IP address and configure the VPN server again, it worked.

• Cisco VPN problem with security update KB3057839 for Vista

  Someone had problems with any connection Cisco VPN works after the installation of update of security KB3057839 for Vista? When this update is installed, the pop-up to enter the password and user id not come, need to use the Task Manager to close the program. The first time I went back to the restore point to get my VPN to work, this time I tried to reinstall the VPN but that doesn't work anymore. I started to uninstall updates (had 7 of them), when I got to it, KB3057839, the VPN began working again.

  Mike

  See this on the real issue:

  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/PuTTY/wishlist/Vista-update-breaks-config.html

  It turns out that the logon dialog box is invisible, but still, it agrees to enter you your password and LOG you!

• VPN problem taking in charge the VRF CSR

  Hello community,

  I am currently evaluating CSR at AWS (60 day trial) and already around the usual problems and specialty architecture network AWS design.

  I can't open a TAC case, because we purchased no license. We will, once this last problem is solved.

  Current configuration:

  • Two councillors in a VPC in two AZs
  • Transit between two advisers of the GRE tunnel
  • running supports the BGP VRF
  • using door VRF
  • the RSC is connected to several AWS VPC (customers) via the AWS VPN feature - route entirely mesh based VPN--a VRF customer - all running with BGP
  • Link to local is done in the same way: entirely mesh route based VPN - using door VRF - all running with BGP
  • VRF import/export rules

  It works fine - no problems here. All HA tests work as expected. So far, so good.

  Now, we had to create a VPN connection to a special local location of our society. We should create a policy based VPN location (no support for VPN road based there). It is a two-to-one VPN. Two advisors of the connection to a gateway onPrem. The two tunnels, run the same field of encryption. OnPrem routing is based on the State of the tunnel. We put this tunnel in the VRF door of entry. Routes are injected to the door VRF routing table by VPN process (reverse-way static in crypto map). To get these exported to consumer VRF routes, there is a network statement in door VRF BGP process.

  Well, this also works fine if we do this only with CSR A. Reachablity is out. CSR B the delivery of the CSR due to taking work supported the VRF VPN. However, if we establish the second CSR B tunnel, there is something strange happens.

  Tunnel is very well implemented. Traffic through the tunnel at CSR B is accepted and routed to the destination. Created at door VRF on CSR B traffic is routed in its own VPN very well. However, traffic from a VRF client who reached CSR B (traceroute proved that) is not routed through the VPN tunnel, despite the VPN client routing table is to say. CSR A running the same configuration, there is no problem. Only on the CSR B.

  I don't understand this. If remove us the configuration of the tunnel of CSR and create only tunnel on CSR B, it still does not. I don't understand why, because I did a comparison of config and found no difference.

  Someone at - it an idea, whats going on?

  How can I debug this problem?

  CSR - A:

  B 172.29.13.176/28 [20/0] via 1.1.119.182 (vrf - default), 3w4d

  CSR - B:

  with route (doesn't work is not for the customer VRF)
  B 172.29.13.176/28 [20/0] via 1.1.119.182 (vrf - default), 00:00:02

  No itinerary (work, because only sent by public transit to the CSR - A)
  B 172.29.13.176/28 [20/0] via 192.168.254.53 (vrf - default), 00:38:23

  This problem is hard to describe, I would really appriciate discuss with a TAC engineer in a WebEx. Is this possible?

  Thank you.

  Hello Tobias,.

  The problem you describe is going to be outside our CSR platform expertise. Looks like the CSR works well and HA works as well, and now you're trying to find a solution to a problem of network/VPN that you are facing.

  Our team is led to find an internal resource to resolve your issue, please allow us a day or two to get back to you with an answer

  Concerning

  Tony

• ping for the pix vpn problem

  Hello

  I got a pix 501 (6.3 - 4) on a local network and try to use Cisco VPN Client (4.0.2-D) on a remote pc.

  I can open a vpn session.

  I can't ping from the remote pc to the LAN

  I can ping from any station on the LAN to the remote pc

  After that I did a ping of a station on the LAN to the remote pc, I ping the remote computer to the local network.

  I am so newb, trying for 2 days changing ACLs, no way.

  I must say that I am in dynamic ip wan on the local network and the remote pc.

  Any idea about this problem?

  Any help is welcome.

  Here is the configuration of my pix:

  6.3 (4) version PIX

  interface ethernet0 10baset

  interface ethernet1 100full

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  activate the password * encrypted

  passwd * encrypted

  pixfirewall hostname

  domain ciscopix.com

  clock timezone THATS 1

  clock to summer time CEDT recurring last Sun Mar 02:00 last Sun Oct 03:00

  fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  correction... /...

  fixup protocol tftp 69

  names of

  name 192.168.42.0 Dmi

  inside_access_in ip access list allow a whole

  inside_outbound_nat0_acl ip access list allow any 192.168.229.0 255.255.255.0

  outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 ip access list Dmi 255.255.255.0 allow 192.168.229.32 255.255.255.224

  access-list outside_cryptomap_dyn_20 allow icmp a whole

  pager lines 24

  opening of session

  logging trap information

  Outside 1500 MTU

  Within 1500 MTU

  IP address outside the 209.x.x.x.255.255.224

  IP address inside 192.168.42.40 255.255.255.0

  alarm action IP verification of information

  alarm action attack IP audit

  IP local pool dmivpndhcp 192.168.229.1 - 192.168.229.254

  location of PDM 192.168.229.1 255.255.255.255 outside

  209.165.x.x.x.255.255 PDM location inside

  209.x.x.x.255.255.255 PDM location outdoors

  PDM logging 100 information

  history of PDM activate

  ARP timeout 14400

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 209.165.200.225 1

  Timeout xlate 0:05:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225

  H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

  Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts

  AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

  AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts

  AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  Enable http server

  Dmi 255.255.255.0 inside http

  No snmp server location

  No snmp Server contact

  SNMP-Server Community public

  No trap to activate snmp Server

  TFTP server inside the 192.168.42.100.

  enable floodguard

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  AUTH-prompt quick pass

  AUTH-guest accept good

  AUTH-prompt bad rejection

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 20 the value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  Dynamic crypto map dynmap 20 match address outside_cryptomap_dyn_20

  map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP identity address

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 20

  ISAKMP policy 20 3des encryption

  ISAKMP policy 20 chopping sha

  20 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP duration strategy of life 20 86400

  vpngroup address dmivpndhcp pool dmivpn

  vpngroup dns 192.168.42.20 Server dmivpn

  vpngroup dmivpn wins server - 192.168.42.20

  vpngroup dmivpn by default-field defi.local

  vpngroup idle 1800 dmivpn-time

  vpngroup password dmivpn *.

  Telnet timeout 5

  SSH timeout 5

  Console timeout 0

  VPDN username vpnuser password *.

  VPDN allow outside

  VPDN allow inside

  dhcpd address 192.168.42.41 - 192.168.42.72 inside

  dhcpd lease 3600

  dhcpd ping_timeout 750

  Terminal width 80

  Cryptochecksum: *.

  Noelle,

  Add the command: (in config mode): isakmp nat-traversal

  Let me know if it helps.

  Jay

• VPN problem persists

  Hi, I implemented a project some time back which went something like this: a Headquarters site where a PIX515E is installed with a public static IP on its external interface. Three remote sites, each with connecting to the internet through 837 routers ADSL with a dynamic public IP address. I configured the firewall and routers for EzVPN (router is configured in client mode) and the VPN tunnel rises and it works fine. Of course, when there is no interesting traffic through the tunnel and the idle timer on the PIX expires, the tunnel down. It is also very good. The problem is once the tunnel breaks down, it is again automatically when interesting traffic passes through the router (which is assumed). I use the console and ran the debugging on one of the routers and noticed that once the tunnel descends and the router tries to bring it up again, it gives the message:

  "Key pair for this"XXX. " XX. XX. Mask XX/XX"already exists." Then, when I give the command "clear crypto isakmp his ', the tunnel rises immediately. I already posted this question before (link:http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1dd6e4b2). Maybe she has something to do with the Dead Peer Detection on the PIX and the router system. In any case, I have configured the following command on the router and PIX:

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive 2 10

  but still it does not solve the problem. The router's IOS version 12.3 (2) XC2 and the PIX OS version 6.3 a (3). Also im attaching the PIX and router config for this post. What else can be done to solve the problem?

  I replied to your last message.

  As I said, you must at least 12.3.7 so that it works correctly.

  "You must at least 12.3 (7) T for Dead Peer Detection work and send KeepAlive interval you want.

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive [interval] [dry til counted dead] periodical

  for example,.

  "isakmp crypto 15 5 keepalive periodicals.

  the key word is "periodic" is not available until 12.3.7 or later.

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive 2 10

  without periodic does nothing, you need periodic KeepAlive.

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive 2 10 periodicals

  will maintain the tunnel and head of network device know if/when it falls. It should be applied to the router and the PIX in your situation.

  I worked through this issue before with IOS EzVPN (12.3 (11) T) to PIX (6.3 (3)) and IOS EzVPN hub VPN3000 (4.1) of the basic VPN

  also... http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_guide09186a00801ee19a.html

• Port RV180 transmission problem

  I wanted to send a range of ports on a RV180, so I created a service for them, but when I go to the port forwarding page, it seems that you must enter an internal port number, which is a problem, because with a range not sure what was the incoming port, and also you can not enter a range in the field internal port even when. Online help, he mentioned an option for this:

  Before port: select same inbound port if the traffic
  should be sent to the same port as the incoming traffic or specify
  Port if incoming traffic must be sent to a particular port.
  Port number: the port to which the incoming traffic must be addressed to the
  specify port option is selected.

  But this option does not exist in the interface. There is only the internal port field. It's certainly an oversight? If you can not forward a range of ports within a service that you create, what point you afford it to create in the first place?

  Hi Matthew,

  With RV180, we have redirection port to the LAN beach. (tested and working)

  Please follow these steps:

  1. According to Firewall--> setting advanced--> custom Services

  2. Add the port range, then choose the Type of Protocol (Please if you have only the port in the port range forwarding delete them)

  3. under firewall--> access rules--> add the following rules

  4. of WAN LAN, Action : always allow Service : your service, Source: all, Dnat: private server IP, status : activate, SAVE

  --> Now if we want to check you can go to port forwarding, we will see the rule added automatically and in the inner harbour are EMPTINESS --> please do not change the rule for port forwarding, otherwise, the router will be expected to put the internal address

  --> If we want to test (if you have the router in test area and you do not have the server connected locally) please follow these steps in order to confirm our configuration

  0 Please install wireshark (packet sniffer)

  1. under Administration--> diagnostic--> the Capture of packets

  2. Select LAN and start to capture traffic

  3. from customer outside trying to access for access with the public IP address with another port already configured for access (from the publicip:port browser) rule

  4. stop the packet capture and downloaded

  5. open with Wireshark and filter by "tcp.port is xx" you will be there the request arrives at the LAN it means the firewall allows the port (number xx:port)

  ------------------------------

  Here a screenshots of my test: (I have 70-80 TCP port range forwarding) in-house IP 192.168.1.100

  fichier.jpg

  

  Please rate this post or marked as replied to help other customers of Cisco

  Greetings

  Mehdi

• Anyconnect VPN problem

  Hello friends!

  I ve been trying to configure the anyconnect VPN, but I cannot generate the CA, probably I m doing wrong sothing.

  To be honest, I Don t know if the problem int this VPN is only what is missing, but is the only thing that I've seen what can be a problem.

  Someone knows how to generate the CA in the ASA?

  Hi Marcio,

  Please follow this link:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/12597006/how-configure-ASA-CA-s...

  Do you want authentication certificate based for Anyconnect users?

  I'm not sure we really need a CA in this case.

  You can try to check this third party link to configure the Anyconnect on SAA basic settings:

  http://www.petenetlive.com/kb/article/0000943

  Kind regards

  Aditya

  Please evaluate the useful messages.

• Cisco RV220W IPSec VPN problem Local configuration for any config mode

  Dear all,

  I need help, I am currently evaluating RV220W for VPN usage but I'm stuck with the config somehow, it seems that there is a problem with the Mode-Config?

  What needs to be changed or where is my fault?

  I have installed IPSec according to the RV220W Administrator's Guide. Client's Mac with Mac Cisco IPSec VPN, I also tried NCP Secure Client.

  I have 3 other sites where the config on my Mac works fine, but the Cisco VPN router is not.

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: remote for found identifier "remote.com" configuration

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: application received for the negotiation of the new phase 1: x.x.x.x [500]<=>2.206.0.67 [53056]

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: early aggressive mode.

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: RFC 3947

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsra-isakmp-xauth-06.txt

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO - UNITY

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: DPD

  2013-03-07 01:55:49: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: for 2.206.0.67 [53056], version selected NAT - T: RFC 39472013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: floating ports NAT - t with peer 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload is x.x.x.x [4500]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: NAT detected: Peer is behind a NAT device

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: request sending Xauth for 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association established for x.x.x.x [4500] - 2.206.0.67 [52149] with spi: 1369a43b6dda8a7d:fd874108e09e207e

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: type of the attribute "ISAKMP_CFG_REPLY" from 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: connection for the user "Testuser".

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: type of the attribute "ISAKMP_CFG_REQUEST" from 2.206.0.67 [52149]

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] WARNING: ignored attribute 5

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28678

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for 2.206.0.67 [52149] has no config mode

  2013-03-07 01:55:50: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28683

  2013-03-07 01:56:07: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: purged-with proto_id = ISAKMP and spi = 1369a43b6dda8a7d:fd874108e09e207e ISAKMP Security Association.

  2013-03-07 01:56:08: [CiscoFirewall] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association deleted for x.x.x.x [4500] - 2.206.0.67 [52149] with spi: 1369a43b6dda8a7d:fd874108e09e207e

  Hi Mike, the built-in client for MAC does not work with the RV220W. The reason is, the MAC IPSec client is the same as the Cisco VPN 5.x client.

  The reason that this is important is that the 5.x client work that on certain small business products include the SRP500 and SA500 series.

  I would recommend that you search by using a client VPN as Greenbow or IPSecuritas.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Site to Site PIX VPN problems

  Hi, I currently have a site to site vpn upward and running and it works fine. I try to put the other two online and just cannot make them work. I used the same configuration of one operation but I cannot get the next tunnel. I saw several errors when debugging isakmp and ipsec and they are at the end of my configs. Anyone have any ideas? Thank you

  Main site - a vpn clients connecting too it and pt to pt vpn to 3 endpoints

  Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (3)

  * Main Site Config *.

  client_vpn 10.10.0.0 ip access list allow 255.255.0.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  VPN_to_Site2 10.10.0.0 ip access list allow 255.255.0.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access client_vpn

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac fws_encry_set

  outside_map 60 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  address for correspondence card crypto outside_map 60 VPN_to_Site2

  crypto outside_map 60 peer 64.X.X.19 card game

  card crypto outside_map 60 transform-set fws_encry_set

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP key * address 64.X.X.19 netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth-no-config-mode

  ISAKMP identity address

  ISAKMP nat-traversal 20

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption

  ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  Site 2 config

  * only because the pt to pt does not work I have it set up to allow vpn clients to cross to connect to the main site.

  Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (5) *.

  permit access ip 192.168.0.0 list VPN_to_Main 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access VPN_to_Main

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac fws_encry_set

  outside_map 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  outside_map card crypto 10 corresponds to the address VPN_to_Main

  crypto outside_map 10 peer 207.X.X.13 card game

  card crypto outside_map 10 transform-set fws_encry_set

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  ISAKMP allows outside

  ISAKMP key * address 207.X.X.13 netmask 255.255.255.255 No.-xauth-no-config-mode

  ISAKMP identity address

  ISAKMP nat-traversal 20

  part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption

  ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

  10 2 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400

  Errors

  PIX (config) # IPSEC (sa_initiate): ACL = deny; No its created

  authenticator is HMAC-MD5IPSEC (validate_proposal): invalid local address

  I have a link that works very well. I have copied the config from there, changed the ip info and it does not work. The only differences in the configs are no sysopt route dnat and it's on Version 6.2 (2)

  IPSec (sa_initiate): ACL = deny; No its created

  I think that you have configured a VPN tunnel without removing the cryptographic card of the external interface. The message above is the error we get in such situation.

  I suggest the following solution:

  -remove the external interface (the two pix) cryptographic card

  -Cree claire isa his and trendy clear ipsec his (the two pix)

  -Reapply the card encryption on external interfaces.

  If this doesn't solve the problem, restart the equipment.

  Kind regards

  Ajit