Save two-dimensional image od for the web

Hello

I made the script (with your help ) to export images for the web with dimensions 300 x 300 px. Now, I want my script to resize more than files that I get two files one 300 x 300 and another 66 x 66 px. I'll post my script and you ask hel find me the bug

And another question. My script exports the file name + jpg, but it also keeps orginal extension if I get IE. FileName.psd.jpg

can you help me solve this in my script... else is very well...

Thank you

Voah

Edit:

At the time of meen I managed to solve the problem, so here's the new script

But I still have one thing I want to do. I have to manually do folder "300 x 300 and '66 x 66' or my script stops." How coud I do this script make sure files? (inputFolder/300 x 300 / and inputFolder/66 x 66 /)

Save current preferences dialog

var startDisplayDialogs = app.displayDialogs;

Save preferences of current unit

var originalRulerUnits = preferences.rulerUnits;

preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;

var inputFolder is Folder.selectDialog ("select input file");.

var outputFolder is Folder.selectDialog ("select output folder");.

ProcessImages();

function ProcessImages() {}

var filesOpened = 0;

If (inputFolder == null | outputFolder == null)

{

If (inputFolder == null) {}

Alert ("no source folder selected");

}

If (outputFolder == null) {}

Alert ("no output folder selected");

// }

}

else {}

List of files of the var = inputFolder.getFiles ();

for (var i = 0; i < fileList.length; i ++) {}

If (instanceof file in the list of files [i] & &! fileList [i] .hidden) {}

Open (fileList [i]);

ResizeImage();

filesOpened ++;

}

// }

}

Return filesOpened;

}

function ExportPng (filePrefix, fileSuffix) {}

Try

{

var app.activeDocument = docRef;

var Nomdoc = app.activeDocument.name.slice (0, -4);

saveOptions var = new ExportOptionsSaveForWeb();

saveOptions.quality = 70;

saveOptions.format = SaveDocumentType.JPEG;

saveOptions.optimized = true;

docRef.exportDocument(File(app.activeDocument.path+'/300x300//'+docName+'.jpg'), ExportType.SAVEFORWEB, saveOptions);

}

catch (e)

{

Alert ("error when you try to save the image.") \r\r"+ e);

return;

}

};

funkcija export 2

function ExportPng2 (filePrefix, fileSuffix) {}

Try

{

var app.activeDocument = docRef;

var Nomdoc = app.activeDocument.name.slice (0, -4);

saveOptions var = new ExportOptionsSaveForWeb();

saveOptions.quality = 70;

saveOptions.format = SaveDocumentType.JPEG;

saveOptions.optimized = true;

docRef.exportDocument(File(app.activeDocument.path+'/66x66//'+docName+'.jpg'), ExportType.SAVEFORWEB, saveOptions);

}

catch (e)

{

Alert ("error when you try to save the image.") \r\r"+ e);

return;

}

};

ResizeImage() function

{

If (app.documents.length > 0) {}

var app.activeDocument = docRef;

var n = docRef.pathItems.length;

If ((n>0) & & (docRef.pathItems [0] .name! = "Work path")) {}

docRef.pathItems [0] .makeSelection ();

docRef.selection.invert ();

docRef.selection.clear ();

docRef.selection.deselect ();

}

};

function fitImage() {}

var app.activeDocument = docRef;

docRef.trim)

var docWidth = docRef.width.as ("px");

var docHeight = docRef.height.as ("px");

If (docWidth / docHeight > 4.8)

{

docRef.rotateCanvas (315)

docRef.trim)

}

ElseIf (docHeight / docWidth > 4.8)

{

docRef.rotateCanvas (45)

docRef.trim)

}

If (docWidth < docHeight)

{

docRef.resizeImage (undefined, UnitValue(270,"px"), 72, ResampleMethod.BICUBIC)

}

ElseIf (docWidth > docHeight)

{

docRef.resizeImage (UnitValue (270, "px"), undefined, 72, ResampleMethod.BICUBIC)

}

Else if (docWidth == docHeight)

{

docRef.resizeImage (UnitValue(270,"px"), UnitValue(270,"px"), 72, ResampleMethod.BICUBIC)

}

docWidth = docRef.width.as ("px");

docHeight = docRef.height.as ("px");

If (docWidth < docHeight)

{

docRef.resizeCanvas (UnitValue(300,"px"), UnitValue(300,"px"), AnchorPosition.MIDDLECENTER);

}

ElseIf (docWidth > docHeight)

{

docRef.resizeCanvas (UnitValue(300,"px"), UnitValue(300,"px"), AnchorPosition.MIDDLECENTER);

}

Else if (docWidth == docHeight)

{

docRef.resizeCanvas (UnitValue(300,"px"), UnitValue(300,"px"), AnchorPosition.MIDDLECENTER);

}

};

var app.activeDocument = docRef;

var docRef.activeHistoryState = savedState;

fitImage();

app.displayDialogs = DialogModes.NO;

ExportPng (file ('.jpg ',' '))

docRef.resizeImage (UnitValue(66,"px"), UnitValue(66,"px"), 72, ResampleMethod.BICUBIC);

ExportPng2 (file ('.jpg ',' '))

docRef.close (SaveOptions.DONOTSAVECHANGES);

docRef = null;

}

Reset the application preferences

app.displayDialogs = startDisplayDialogs;

preferences.rulerUnits = originalRulerUnits;

Does that help?

main();
function main(){
var originalRulerUnits = preferences.rulerUnits;
preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;
var inputFolder = Folder.selectDialog("Select the input folder");
if(inputFolder == null) return;
var fileList = inputFolder.getFiles(/\.(jpg|tif|psd|png)$/i);
var outputFolder1 = Folder(inputFolder + "/300x300");
if(!outputFolder1.exists) outputFolder1.create();
var outputFolder2 = Folder(inputFolder + "/66x66");
if(!outputFolder2.exists) outputFolder2.create();
for (var a in fileList){
open(fileList[a]);
var Name = decodeURI(activeDocument.name).replace(/\.[^\.]+$/, '');
app.activeDocument.trim(TrimType.TRANSPARENT);
FitImage(300,300);
var saveFile = File(outputFolder1 + "/" + Name + ".jpg");
SaveForWeb(saveFile,70);
FitImage(66,66);
var saveFile = File(outputFolder2 + "/" + Name + ".jpg");
SaveForWeb(saveFile,70);
app.activeDocument.close(SaveOptions.DONOTSAVECHANGES);
}
preferences.rulerUnits = originalRulerUnits;
}
function FitImage( inWidth, inHeight ) {
 var desc = new ActionDescriptor();
 var unitPixels = charIDToTypeID( '#Pxl' );
 desc.putUnitDouble( charIDToTypeID( 'Wdth' ), unitPixels, inWidth );
 desc.putUnitDouble( charIDToTypeID( 'Hght' ), unitPixels, inHeight );
 var runtimeEventID = stringIDToTypeID( "3caa3434-cb67-11d1-bc43-0060b0a13dc4" );
 executeAction( runtimeEventID, desc, DialogModes.NO );
}
function SaveForWeb(saveFile,jpegQuality) {
var sfwOptions = new ExportOptionsSaveForWeb();
   sfwOptions.format = SaveDocumentType.JPEG;
   sfwOptions.includeProfile = false;
   sfwOptions.interlaced = 0;
   sfwOptions.optimized = true;
   sfwOptions.quality = jpegQuality;
activeDocument.exportDocument(saveFile, ExportType.SAVEFORWEB, sfwOptions);
}

Tags: Photoshop

Similar Questions

Scalable Images (jpg) for the web.

Sorry, but not looked at of course that this would even be the reference.
I came across sites that have drag images (without flash) and no matter how small make you the web browser window, the image is reduced to fit or develops, according to what you do to resize the browser window.
Pulling the bottom of the image, the sizes are huge 1900 x 1267 and some are not set at 72 dpi but 96 dpi.
I mostly use Photoshop CS4 to export jpg files, but y at - it another way? Made it through Fireworks? How can I watch the way in which the image has been saved on these sites?
Thanks in advance for you help.

Yankees10 wrote:

.. few are not set at 72 dpi but 96 dpi.

"dpi" has no effect on the web images. Ignore it.

To see the original image, right-click on it, save to your computer, see Photoshop.

These images to scale through a simple setting in HTML/CSS. There is nothing special about the image file.

I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?

I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature? Please advise!

slynn5236 wrote:

I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature? Please advise!

You can do in PSE.
1. Do the math to see how much space you'll need on your canvas to the image and text.
2. Navigate to the file queue > new.blank. Enter the width & height, background color, resolution 72 px / in. It is your canvas, and in the layers palette will be the background layer.
3. Copy and paste the image. It turns on a separate layer
4. Activate the tool move, position the image and resize if necessary
5. Activate the text tool, and then type your text. It will be on a separate so layer
6. Position the text.
7. Flatten layers and go to file > save for web. I'm usually on the long side about 800 px. Don't forget to check "constrain proportions". Adjust the quality slider to suit. You will probably want the type of JPEG file for web work.

How can I save my picture for the web and devices?

How can I save my picture for the web and devices?
I can't find the option when I want to save the image

Hi jacquelineb,

What version of Photoshop are you using?

If you are using the latest version of CC, please consult export images Adobe Photoshop for mobile and web. Tutorials Photoshop Adobe CC

Let us know if that helps.

Kind regards

Assani

Best way to prepare images ProPhoto RGB for the Web?

My working to Edit my RAW files color space is ProPhoto RGB. My master files are saved as ProPhoto RGB 16 bit layered PSD files. I am aware of the many ways to prepare my images for the Web, but it is better to properly view my work on a web site?

«Save for Web...» "of Photoshop is easy, but it's also good work like resize manually,"Convert to Profile"(sRGB), then" save under... ". "an 8-bit JPEG? I noticed "Save for Web...» "its color space designated as"Untagged RGB", while the manual method is"sRGB"will create a file w. Any difference? Thank you.

Were you not satisfied by the answers you got this question on Luminous Landscape forum? I will repost mine here:

---

You should always incorporate the profile. With the notable exception of Internet Explorer (which seems to be a lost cause), most browsers now manage well of color management. At least Safari and Firefox both do.

Save for Web in Photoshop always band profile with default settings, you will need to check the "embed color profile". This setting sticks. Personally, I think it's well past time to change this default, but that's it.

While you're there, check "Convert to sRGB" and set to "use the embedded profile. This shows you the image with full color management (using the monitor profile to display). Here still SFW uses an obsolete default from the old days, when browsers were not color management.

If you use a range wide screen a few special considerations come in and in Firefox, a manual adjustment has be activated (color management mode 1) *.

Regarding resizing, I have no particular opinion. SFW seems to do well. But you should do a final sharpening after resizing, that needs to be done in Photoshop anyway, so he can probably handle resizing too. Construction while some actions and you are ready.

Firefox users should enable this setting in all cases, regardless of monitor they use. What it does is assign sRGB to any untagged material. This allows full color management chain, instead of just go directly to the screen unmanaged. IOW, even color management on hardware untagged, so long as it is created in sRGB with sRGB numbers.

How do I clear images of PowerPoint for the web?

I'm supposed to create images for the web on their part gives me graphics in PowerPoint For now, I stick to PowerPoint in Photoshop and save it as a .png of 300 dpi, but they are not very clear, so I have to make it large enough to be readable. Does anyone know what I could do to make them better? I'm new to Photoshop and teach myself, so there are probably better ways to do what I do not know. I've linked below for an example of blur that I get in the charts when I use the above method.
http://www.MAPI.NET/brazils-manufacturing-growth-puzzle

PPI is not serious on the web. Browsers think in absolute pixels and take 72 dpi or use the DPI screens as defined in the settings of your operating system. Also to export slides as images using a simple file--> save as, and choose an image as PNG format or create screenshots, not copy & paste. Of course none of this will mean anything, if you resave the than smaller ones. No one can discern anything at these sizes lowercase, regardless of the wiith or without interpoalted pixels "mushing upward.

Mylenium

Best way to save the images streaming from the web to device?

We have an app to browse a catalog this content of stream of a web server. There is an image for each product, some in JPG format and some in PNG format. Our server is fast and reliable, so everything worked without problems so far, but we would like to give users the ability to save data on their device, so they don't have to listen to every time. I've only worked with before SharedObjects, which are capped at 100kb and will not help in this situation.
What would be the best approach for storage of images and keeping them is crushed in the updates? Save an uncompressed Bitmap uses too much storage space. Adobe's JPEGEncoder class is completely useless because it takes 10 to 30 seconds to save an image of medium size on a typical device. Also, he does not sense of re - encode jpg files, and we must preserve transparency in png.
At the moment we are using a loader to retrieve images and using loader.content to access the image data in the code. Is it possible to save the image file in its original local format when downloaded with a charger? We would like the images stored in the application data and not available through the gallery. With regard to the registration of the data for each product (price, description, etc.), the built-in SQLite support would be enough or should we create our own files?
Thanks for the tips!

Ah, I got it. Existing files are checked as indicated cmholden. If the image is not stored locally, we use URLStream to load the image file on the web. We can then save the file directly via the ByteArray to the URLStream and then use our code existing loader to load the ByteArray even as a DisplayObject. I was worried there would be some downturn app to save the files, but the change in performance is negligible and of course once the images are saved on the device they charge a lot more quickly the next time the application is run!

save multiple files for the web in JPEG max at a resolution of 800%

I had more than 200 created illustrator files. They all have the same dimensions. I wanted an adobe illustrator script that saves all files for the web in jpeg.
Export options must be max.resolution of all files should be increased to 800%.
I think it's the reasoning
Open a folder with all the files
loop through each file
Save for web each in jpeg format to the quality of resolution and up to 800%
the names of all jpeg files should be the same from these illustrator files (if possible)
I will be very thankful to you if you could help me
Best regards,
Hassan Ali

As far as I understand your request it is also possible with a simple action in batch mode.

What happened to the image field when you create a field of type of image for the Web application?

What happened to the image field when you create a field of type of image for the Web application?

The answer is that the point of the IMAGE has been changed to the MEDIA.

Sorry, Ian, what research for this discussion, I got no results. All good and thanks for the carillon. Hope everything goes well.

Mouma

Illustrator CS4 - when I save it for the web my vectors are pixelated. Help!

I've recently updated to CS4 (I know, I'm always late), but since when I "save for web" my vectors appear pixelated. It seems worse when I want a transparent background. My pictures are for the web and it won't.
I have read a lot about this and can't seem to fix my problem, but here is what I tried: anti-aliasing is checked, view > preview raster, view > preview overprinting, the object > pixelation and probably a few other things. If anyone can help me with this problem it would be GREATLY appreciated! I have attached a picture so you can see what I mean. I created this schematic in Illustrator CS4 and saved for the web with a transparent background and, as you can see, it seems pixelated everywhere.

jskopinsky,

It shouldn't look like this as a GIF, but what happens if you save it as PNG24?

What size my image of background layer should be for the web?

I do a logo design for someone I know and he wants that he placed ontop of a background texture steel. I source on an image of good quality, but despite my diligence in trying to understand how the resolution and the size of the image, I can't seem to grasp what I should do with it. I saw countless videos, but it must be a problem with the ol' brain ' in the head I.
It is likely (at least for now) just for the web. My goal is just get it right so that it looks crisp and clear on the screen.
The image I have is 1024 x 1384 pixel, 72 dpi. Yes 14.2 inches wide by 19.2 inches high.
I have to change this at all? I'll be crop the image, but I'm worried that I will do it's too small and so it should be expanded, and I could meet some blurring.
Should I expand? I heard that this isn't the most ideal thing.
72 dpi is higher than the resolution must be for images of the screen, but is there an advantage to hit? Why couldn't just do 300 dpi for the heck of it?
Do I need to pay attention to the thumbs, or is - this just good guide for when you print something?
I'm honestly just trying to get my head around all of this, so that in the future, I can't spend as much time to know what I have to do. Everything I read and any help is greatly appreciated.

I believe that we have the impression that the image was for the entire background. Being its a banner among the dimensions should be much smaller and therefore can be a picture of lower resolution due to this fact.

With respect to the other dimension, this will depend on your design. For example it will fill the width or height of the screen?

With respect to models, you send a single image to a web browser and the browser itself repeats this image. This is why it is desirable. Your image can be 10 x 10 pixels pixels in the right circumstances. For any detail real chances are she would most likely be around 512 x 512. More this image is the faster it will load, it is that she may have more details. Its up to you to find this balance.

Prep file InDesign for the web.

PSCS5, Mac OS 10.6.4
I need to prepare a book cover created in InDesign display with online sellers (Angus & Roberton, Austraila, and Amazon for beginners). My first attempt and prepare the InD file for the web has failed. No file is available from each provider. Can you help me?
The InD file is 8 "x 8", contains 2 images, 2 vectors of I and PS text. " PS files are set at 350 dpi (by record the print service bureau). The book is intended for the wet press 4 colours. The first set of wet proofs are superb, so I know I'm on the right track with color, related, etc. images management.
My first approach when I tried it prepare for the web was to export the InD file in a JPEG file, open it in PS and save it as a .psd file before making any changes. After you convert the color in RGB, I resize to 3 "x 3" at 72 dpi, then saved as a JPEG file with a new name. " I think that the resizing and resolutoion is where I was wrong. But I am at a loss for the right way forward and what parameters to use for the image size and resolution.
What is the procedure I should I have followed to prepare the cover over a picture for the web? Here is the image exported in JPEG format at 150 dpi.
Thanks in advance.
Toni

Toni...

I'm doing print and web and often take a page ID to an image.

What I do...
1. Export Indesign to PDF. (Use any standard PDF job option you have, same PDFX1a)
2. Drag the PDF Photoshop > open 300 PPI and no matter what the dimensions are already present.
3. If necessary, crop and flatten the image in Photoshop. (PDFx1a will be cropped and flattening will offset any transparency in the PDF file.)
4. In Photoshop > file > save for Web > dimensions of the input image I need in the box dialog SFW
5. Click Save.
What's been sent by others is correct. There is no PPP/DPI for the web. The only thing that matters is the width and height. If you want you can test to show you. Create 2 images - one to 100 x 100 pixels and 300ppi and the other to 100 x 100 pixels and 72 dpi. Save the two images for the web, and then open the pictures stored in a browser... they are the same size and look identical.

Export to PDF from ID, you get a crisp, clean the PDF.

By dragging the PDF to PS, you get a purified PS image. If you export a jpg of ID and then save a jpg of PS that you create artifacts due to the re-registration of a compressed format (jpg).

Using save for Web to create the final image all the superfluous image data are robbed and you get a basic, clean and crisp image to the size entry in the SFW.

There are other roads, you can take, but for me this five-step process gives the best results in all cases.

What is the disadvantage of savings WITHOUT color profile for the web?

I have discussed this issue in another thread and a clear argument against saving jpg files * without * a color profile must be performed.
I'm very annoyed with how much more red and saturated, all my jpg files appear in IE (which does not read the sRGB embedded profile) compared to FF (which is the case).
I tried to save the image even with the inclusion of unchecked color profile, and of course, IE and FF are showing the same image.
It seems to me that including color profiles with jpg are just an invitation for different browsers interpret the image differently.
Why not just save them all, WITHOUT color profiles?
The downside to this, what exactly?

mjyeager wrote:

Emil, please do not confuse what follows for stubbornness...

No worries, I never had such thoughts

mjyeager wrote:

... IE does not read color profiles. The fact of FF. ERGO, in situations where a color profile is involved, the JPG will be different in each browser.

True, without color managed programs and management the colors may not display an image in the same way. Except in the situation where the color profile describing the color of the image or the color values of an image without a color profile, by an extraordinary chance match the display capabilities of color of the device used by the program managed without colors.

One of the problems that the addresses of color management is that all monitors will display the same color differently. Color management will make colors appear the same or as close as possible.

A color managed program will send the RGB values of the color of the video card corrected to compensate for the differences between how your monitor displays color values and how they are perceived.

For example, to help my Monitor wide gamut, when I create an image in Photoshop, with a red color pure R = 255, G = 0 and B = 0 and then do a screen capture, I can check how Photoshop sends these values to the video card. The result is R = 222, G = 65, B = 0 when I'm simulating an ideal sRGB display. So I can see how my colors appear on the screens of ideal sRGB. However, in reality, it is very likely to have a monitor displaying space sRGB color ideal without a color management, so to complete the color management chain, the other monitors that display my image must also have the appropriate color management to compensate for the differences in screen and display correctly RGB numbers representing the color that I see on my screen.

mjyeager wrote:

... However, if the JPG has no color profile, image shows exactly the same way in both browsers...

Who will most likely be a bad smell, which means not repoducing the expected color which is always the case with the browsers managed without colors.

mjyeager wrote:

... Now, let's say this image - which looks the same in both browsers - is too hot. I can load it in Photoshop, change its hue and re-save is more what I'm looking for. The resulting image will then out - in the two browsers identically - the way I want to...

Yes, the image will be the same in both browsers on your and any other monitor but the colors that you create (edit) will examine the way which only see you them on your monitor.

mjyeager wrote:

... Now, what I think you are trying to do, is that I have no control on what are the conditions of viewing on the OTHER end (i.e., visitors to the site). They could range wide monitors, cheaper monitors, running MAC or PC, etc...

I don't remember talking about this earlier, but yes, it's true.

mjyeager wrote:

... It's true. I have no control over that. However, how including the color profile sRGB with the JPG would give me more control over these things I would not include? Unless you had to tell me that browsers arbitrarily apply a random color profile when in the absence of one, I am simply not understand how including the color with the JPG profile performs one another act that ensure that the picture is completely different in FF it does in Internet Explorer.

You who are absolutely wrong. Color management is not to have any control over how other devices are setup, calibrated, etc.. As I said earlier make sure you communicate the colors scheduled correctly or as close as possible, as long as you and the destination use the proper color management. This means that the embedded profile FF will display correctly the planned colors while IE will not. If you do not include a color profile with your image both FF and IE will not display correctly the planned colors but they will be equal in that.

mjyeager wrote:

... I understand the need for color profiles to print. In fact, my printer insists on the details when it comes to color profiles.

But for the web? I'm still not understand where the downside is to omit the color profile. It's not like the browsers get CONFUSED when it is not included. Or that the colors will start randomly from refreshing one page to another.

I am really trying to understand what you are saying here, but still haven't.

In addition to what Marian said:

If you create the colors using an sRGB display ideal (given the color management on your system works properly, it can be simulated by color of Photoshop on your range management widescreen when you assign the profile sRGB color to the image) and then on any ideal sRGB display, it will look the same you see on your screen regardless if it's with or without embedded sRGB color profile. However, in reality, it is unlikely to have a monitor, sRGB, display of the ideal space of sRGB color without color management. Now what does this mean in practice? Assume that users interested in, using the IE managed without colors on a PC with the Windows default color management. In other words, color management programs are told by the system monitor displays the ideal sRGB space, which is very likely to be the truth. Then users with this configuration with sRGB monitors will not see a difference between IE and FF when viewing your image with or without sRGB profile, the colors are not very likely to be the same that you see on the screen, but with the difference that is more likely to be accepted depending on how close to the ideal color space sRGB these monitors are. If some of these users with this configuration have wide range monitors, then the image will always be the same with or without sRGB profile, but with a very unacceptable difference of how you see it on your space to sRGB sumulated - strongly supersaturated.

For users that have the color correctly managed systems, when the image is saved with a sRGB profile, it appears color managed programs such as FF the same or as close as possible to the way in which you can see on your monitor. Programs run without colors the case remains the same as that described above.

A little history on how standard sRGB was created. It is a standard, including more things, but above all defining an abstract color space. It was created sometime after that the market was already flooded with computer monitors, and the creation of ideal sRGB color space was based on an average PC monitor display capabilities over time. After that the manufacturers used this standard sRGB as a target to create monitors.

UN-color of programs run on PC have been created and tested using sRGB monitors so that they can't be considered reliable for showing intended to display colors if the images they use have been created using an sRGB they will be in the stadium of this range of sRGB.

Color changes during the recording of the PSD to JPEG (safe for the web) in PS CS5 working in sRGB

As I secured it for the web a PSD file, jpeg version of the same file changes slightly color - I opened the two files in PS CS5 to compare.
File initially processed in Lightroom 6 and converted to sRGB for export.
I worked in the sRGB color space in Photoshop.
When exporting I secured for the web. I tried both options checked including the color profile and convert to sRGB.
I tried to save to the web as a PNG and color remained the same, she only moves for JPEG files.
You can't really see the difference in color with a naked eye, but be specific. I don't understand why he would change when I work in the color space is sRBG. Please help this is driving me crazy!

JPEG compression can change the values, even quite spectacular on single pixel level. You have the selector of color set to "sample point"?

size of files when saving for the web

'Save for web' sometimes export icon to very small size with size huge file (500Ko), when I take the same image and re - record using "Save for web", I get the small file (1 or 2 KB)
Why does this happen?

This happens because Photoshop is save the metadata in your PSD and JPG files. You can see that from Photoshop in file Info under the file menu, and then on the tab of raw data you will be able to see usually several lines of metadata information, sometimes thousands, and if you did a lot of manipulations on the file that can add literally MBs to the size of the file. Save for the Web and export as you can delete metadata. Personally, I find it a nuisance more than a useful feature tends to remove metadata from Lightroom, there is a plugin that allows you to select what you want to keep and what to throw away.

Hope that helps

Terri

Save two-dimensional image od for the web

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for