Shared member

Hi people,

I would like to get some information about the sharing of members, for example, sharing a base entity.
When you set the properties of an entity, you define a parent too. So my question is: can the aggregate Member shared both parents? Or it will only consolidate the parent set in properties?

Please, advice!

Thank you!

Read

When you define an entity that you can assign a default parent, this entiy however may be shared under a different parent in a cumulative replacement, and if you use the default grouping it will agregate to both parents.

Tags: Business Intelligence

Similar Questions

  • Problem with shared member

    Dear all,

    I have a problem with the filter of analysis.

    filter.png

    When I used this filter, I can get this result

    Results.png

    but, when I try to get more specific members (gen5, account = 680 40').

    filter2.png

    the result also returned no results. I tried to change the filter to only use the gen5, account.

    filter 3.png

    and outcomes is surprised me

    results2.png

    Gen3 and gen4 leave before changed to another Member. 680 40 is a shared member that I used to create a hierarchy of replacement for my aggregation. The original location is on the last picture shown.

    is there anyway to make my 2nd Blimpo work?

    filter2.png

    Thanks in advance.

    Note: I use 11.1.7.0 and 11.1.2.3.500 with Cube of BSO essbase obiee

    Draw the generated MDX and check it out in detail. Most of these cases are down to an outline of a cube that is not necessarily suitable for use by a motor like OBIEE who is willing to dynamically alter its views constantly.

  • 11.1.2.2 shared member / issue Ad-Hoc hierarchy

    First post here... hope I give enough information.

    We have recently upgraded to 11.1.2.2.

    When retrieving a Ad Hoc which was already built and comes from 11.1.2.0 several times, several Member in the excel worksheet names are passed to a [parent]. format [child].  Pursuit of the investigation, these members that have changed are shared members and the being displayed was a common parent.  We could enter the name of the parent member, but he always comes back to the [parent]. format [child].  It seems that if an Ad - Hoc contains a shared member is to convert all members that exist as a member shared somewhere in the main lines in this format.  He is also behind those rows to lose their force excellent formulas.

    My guess is that it's perhaps related to essbase now supports duplicate names in the general plan and that the parent is required in these cases to differentiate.  However, we have not enabled on this schema of databases of duplicate names.

    Is that what anyone has experienced similar behavior, if yes you have a solution or a correction which took care of the issue?  Did I miss an option in SmartView?

    Thank you!

    What you see is a bug and I posted something about this recently

    Oracle - Hyperion Labs...: issues of Smart View with another hierarchy - Surprises in the fifth part of Essbase

    Concerning

    Celvin

    http://www.orahyplabs.com

  • @Prior works if @Prior is a shared member?

    Hello

    If you use @Prior and the former member in the dimension is a member of "Shared" @Prior will know how to deal with that and the return values of the non-shared member?

    Hello

    Yes. Think that members shared as shortcuts in Windows.

  • Number of shared member

    All,

    I work in Essbase Studio and am having a problem when I try to deploy the cube. I have a hierarchy of organization with looks as follows:

    Segment
    Assets
    Company

    However, I'm getting six faults of ' illegal tag < member > "and listed members are all active. When I have the only Segment and active in my hierarchy, everything works fine. When I looked in the database, I saw 5 members listed have a company beneath them that bears the same name. The last member is 'Unknown', for all data that cannot be mapped correctly, I have a Unknown Segment, Asset and Company.

    How you allow members shared in Essbase Studio? Is this even where shared members apply or is there a more appropriate alternative?

    Thank you!

    The track in the studio build you shared member running sums are to have the primary in your hierarchy as structure

    Segment
    -Asset
    -Company
    -operating unit
    Other parent
    -Use device (possibly filtered)

    If we use the base sample for example
    It would be
    Family
    -Sku
    Member defined user called diet
    -a user created member called drinks containing sugar that is filtered on the alias containg Diet.

    If you want more details, it is in the Essbase Studio user guide of in my book, Look smarter than you are with Essbase Studio (Yes it's a shameless plug)

  • Can I use a dynamic member Calc as a Shared member

    Can I use a dynamic Calc member as a member Shared in another hierarchy?
    is it mandatory to do a member as type stored if we want to use the same Member in another hierarchy as a shared member. ?



    -KK

    Yes, we can create a shared member of a dynamic member Calc.

  • Failed to add the shared member

    Hello
    I get the following error message when I'm loading members at my request of essbase. I chose option 'Allow duplicate Shared Members'.
    Any suggestions to fix this please (without renaming shared members)?

    Error message: failed to add the shared member (CM): a duplicate member is in outline, but it is in another dimension.

    Concerning

    Chandra

    You can only add members with the name or alias from another dimension, even if the names of the members in double is enabled. I do not recommend this. This problem often arises because you have the same name in several dimensions. Like other having to product and customer and division. We generally get around it by prefixing or suffixing the names in a dimension with something like prod others, cust-other, div-others. Pourriez you either prefix the entire generation by using the prefix option in the rule of load or for some names of members by using the option to replace the rule of lod

  • Validation parameter query to exclude a shared member

    Hi all

    I have a validation condition, that restrict members some threshold to share under members at some specific levels.

    because of some of their custom properties are derived and when this member are shared they are contrary to their status as property on different levels.

    So, I want to exclude the setting condition of shared members.

    Please find my existing code below and the modified code that work does'nt.

    Shared members must inherit its main member values, as well as the conditions of setting on their main nodes.

    Validation code

    If)

    (OR)

    Equals (String, ABBREV (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_IS),

    IsNodeBelow (Abbrev (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_IS)),

    If (NodeIsLeaf (),

    ListContains (PropValue (Custom.Prop1), (Custom.BPA_UDA) PropValue, |),

    IsBlank (PropValue (Custom.BPA_UDA))

    ),

    If)

    (OR)

    Equals (String, ABBREV (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_BS),

    IsNodeBelow (Abbrev (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_BS)),

    If (NodeIsLeaf (),

    ListContains (PropValue (Custom.Prop2), (Custom.BPA_UDA) PropValue, |),

    IsBlank (PropValue (Custom.BPA_UDA))

    ),

    If)

    (OR)

    Equals (String, ABBREV (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_METRICS),

    IsNodeBelow (Abbrev (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_METRICS)),

    If (NodeIsLeaf (),

    ListContains (PropValue (Custom.Prop2), (Custom.BPA_UDA) PropValue, |),

    IsBlank (PropValue (Custom.BPA_UDA))),

    If)

    PropValue (Core.SharedFlag_MDM),

    HierNodePropValue (BPA_Account, PropValue (Core.PrimaryName_MDM), Custom.BPA_UDA),

    HierNodePropValue (BPA_Account, Abbrev (), Custom.BPA_UDA)

    ),

    If (PropValue (Core.Leaf), true, not (IsDefinedPropVal (Custom.BPA_UDA, ABBREV (()))

    ))))

    Members of the IS are not able to be shared under BS because their values for custom.prop1 & custom.prop2 are different as IS and BS.

    I want shared members to exclude the given condition, so that all members of any level can be shared by the hierarchy.

    Thanks and greetings

    Madhu

    This is because testing to white for the nodes was found not in the code,

    Try this - the newly added part highlighted

    If)

    VarValeurProp (Core.SharedFlag_MDM), True,

    If)

    (OR)

    Equals (String, ABBREV (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_IS),

    IsNodeBelow (Abbrev (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_IS)),

    If (NodeIsLeaf (),

    (Or)

    IsBlank (PropValue (Custom.BPA_UDA)),

    ListContains (PropValue (Custom.Prop1), (Custom.BPA_UDA) PropValue, |) ),

    IsBlank (PropValue (Custom.BPA_UDA))

    ),

    If)

    (OR)

    Equals (String, ABBREV (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_BS),

    IsNodeBelow (Abbrev (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_BS)),

    If (NodeIsLeaf (),

    (Or)

    IsBlank (PropValue (Custom.BPA_UDA)),

    ListContains (PropValue (Custom.Prop2), (Custom.BPA_UDA) PropValue, |) ),

    IsBlank (PropValue (Custom.BPA_UDA))

    ),

    If)

    (OR)

    Equals (String, ABBREV (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_METRICS),

    IsNodeBelow (Abbrev (), TOTAL_ACCOUNT_METRICS)),

    If (NodeIsLeaf (),

    (Or)

    IsBlank (PropValue (Custom.BPA_UDA)).

    ListContains (PropValue (Custom.Prop2), (Custom.BPA_UDA) PropValue, |) ),

    IsBlank (PropValue (Custom.BPA_UDA))),

    If (PropValue (Core.Leaf), true, not (IsDefinedPropVal (Custom.BPA_UDA, ABBREV (()))

    ))))

  • Display of shared member

    Hi all

    I am extracting data from smart and when I extracted the data shared hierarchy it shows the name of the Member in [Parent's name]. [member name]. Is it possible to display it in the format of a regular member name? I use Essbase 11.1.2.3

    Thank you!

    This problem has been fixed in Essbase Release 11.1.2.3.000 Patch Set update (PSU): 11.1.2.3.001 as the Patch 13951433.

    Take a look-Zoom on the members shared in Smart View displays name of Parent and child name in brackets, i.e. [power]. [Cola] (Doc ID 1584927.1)

    HTH-

    Jasmine

  • Can I refer to a rangelist in a hierarchy of shared member?

    I would like to make the sum of a series of accounts based on one hierarchy, not the main hierarchy.  In the hierarchy of the main, they are 1,5,4,3,2, and in the alt hierarchy, they are shared in the good order of 1,2,3,4,5.  If I reference the rank 1:3, how can you ensure that I get 1,2,3,4 and not 1,5,4,3?

    Background:

    Basically, I'm trying to map a sum of numerical range of account numbers in general ledger to another account of management based on the members of the other 2 dimensions.  The main problem I have is that, as I have not found the function that can sort in alphanumeric order a list within a selection of members, and my GL accounts are not in the order in the hierarchy of main due to a reorganization of their parents, I loaded as a sorted list of platform of shared to another hierarchy members.  Now, I just @LIST (1:3, [the optional to use as reference parent node]) function.  I guess another way of asking the question might be: how to reference the member names in Essbase as digital beaches as you would in an ERP?

    Maybe there is another way and I approach it all wrong?

    Essbase v11.1.2.3.507 (under planning)

    So what you really want is to extract all accounts with a number between e.g. 1 and 4 (even if the same parent has other children of 5, 6, 7 and so on)?

    @BETWEEN would do in this case.

  • Essbase different aliases of shared member showing that the primary member

    I have another hierarchy with shared members.  When I retrieve a particular Member in Essbase, the alias is correct.  But, when I explore the alternate hierarchy, takes the alias for the same Member of the Member below.

    Thus, in the main member of XX - alias "XX_Member".

    Member XXA - aslias "XXA_member".

    When I pull a recovery, Essbase, in substitution proposal, is showing as
    Other Parent
    Member of XX (Shared) with alias XXA Member
    EAS has the correct alias.  So, when the add-in essbase foregoing, EAS shows member (shared) with alias XX XX.  It's ONLY the Essbase recovery that shows that this badly.
    There is only one table alias in the database.  The problem does not occur with all shared members.  No idea what could be casuing it?

    ASO has a really strange behavior, without papers, regarding metadata, properties are returned by members in situations of implicit sharing (which is what you have, if the child is not marked never 'share').  The "Never share" tag is the child?

  • Shared member are removed from essbase after refresh

    I moved some members shared another hierarchy of planning Web feature and after runnign refresh shared members appeared in the new location in essbase outline, but same members shared in the previous post did not get deleted hierarchy essbase.
    Any suggesion to solve the problem.

    If it's just once, then go to PARTY and remove members shared the original location, so the contour must be in harmony with essbase and planning.

    See you soon

    John
    http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Not able to see the new Member shared alternative hierarchy on Smart view

    Hello

    I had to make changes on the replacement as a hierarchy below:

    1 created shared member on the new roll upward with Member Shared Property (replacing Hierarchy).

    2 removed the former member under the other roll upward.

    3 refreshed the Hyperion, planning of database.

    4 could see the new Member roll up on the alternative hierarchy after refresh.

    Now, when I try to extract data from the new hierarchy of alternative, I'm not able to get the data that I get the error message like "Invalid Grid - size XXXX member is located at the wrong location".

    I choose the option 'selection of members' members, but the grid is not valid when I try to extract data on smartview.

    Have I missed any step to make changes on the planning? I checked from myside to display the shared member on Essbase after updating of the planning application.

    Can you please help me in fixing the issue?

    Thank you.

    VERP.

    Thanks Dan.

    Tried to build the new sheet, and I was able to run successfully. Members have been placed wrongly and could fix it.

  • How can I remove only one instance shared a member of Hyperion Planning

    Hello

    Can someone tell me how I can load the Hyperion Planning IKM to remove only specific instance of a shared member of Hyperion Planning? I tried specifying the shared member, the parent of the shared instance, "Shared" as the type of data storage, and 'Level 0 Delete' operation. Instead of delete just the shared under the specified parent instance, however, the IKM deleted member base, which in turn deleted all instances shared member and member data (thing lucky I work in a development environment!). At one point, I thought I had things works as I wanted to, but now I think I must have confused.

    Is anyone know definitively that a specific instance of a shared member can be removed the planning and, if so, exactly how do?

    Thank you very much.

    Thank you, well it's good news that it's working now.

    See you soon

    John
    http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Report excerpt not shared on a sparse Dimension Member

    Hello

    I have a report on which I extract an alternative hierarchy

    Parent
    -Child 1 (shared member of a stored member)
    -Child 2 (shared member of a stored member)
    -3 child (shared member of a member of calc dyn)
    -4 children (shared member of a member of calc dyn)

    In the report, I extracted the children of the Parent
    < CHILDREN 'Parent '.

    But the report contains only Child1 and Child2.

    Any suggestions that this could be?
    When I switch the Dimension to Dense all children are extracted correctly.

    thx for your help
    Kevin Kraft

    Hey Kevin,
    I'm not sure I could explain why it does not work, but I can supply that when you share a member of a dense dimension, the base member is already in stock, so maybe that's why it will show when you make the dense dimension.
    I see that you have 3 possibilities to solve your problem.
    1. make the dense dimension.
    2. do not share the dynamic member calc, but do new versions of the Member dynamic calc.
    3 keep the base member, and then share it.

    More than likely number 2 is probably your choice easier with repercussions less elsewhere.
    Good luck
    Robert

Maybe you are looking for

  • Retriveing the number of plots

    I have a XP land with a large number of plots on.  Is there a way I can get it to return the number of plots in use? Thank you Matt.

  • MB2320 - scanning documents of several pages and registration as a single PDF page consecutive

    I just bought and set up a MB2320 Maxify to replace my PIXMA MX892, who was a victim of the dreaded "Incorrect print head - U062 error." My only disappointment so far is the quick replacement of "MP Navigator" with "Canon Toolbox" and analysis of the

  • Problem HP LJ p1102w

    Hello I have a hp Laserjet p1102w. When I bought it, I configured the wifi setting to print the email and documents trought wifi. There is a problem: i can't remember the login details and I I run is no longer a new configuration. I also change my wi

  • How to switch to 32 bit on 64 bit Win 7 Home

    I have a S10-3 and Win 7 Home 64-bit as one of the operating system. I saw that the Lenovo site are only 1 driver for this OS and tht is for the tv tuner card. So I want to downgrade to the 32-bit version. How can I do tht? Thank you X - jo

  • Order the system Vista Home Premium discs.

    I bought a Toshiba Satelite laptop about 9 months, ago and never got around to order Microsoft system disks.  Now I want to upgrade my RAM to 4 GB and try the 64 bit version which should be available on the disks in the factory.  Now, I can't find an