shift registers obvious between tracks

Similar Questions

• Using shift registers global verses

  I'm new to 2009.  Our last update was 7.1.  I'm upgrading our laboratory SW and using events.  EVENT 1: is used to display the data in a text file in a table "data set".  EVENT 2: using to option button and the table "Data set", the user selects the data column to use for the test that is displayed in a table «Points de Test»  EVENT 3: If the user changes the data in the table "set of data', 'Points of Test' test point table is the update.  I use local variables for 'Set data', 'Points of Test' and I was going to use other settings as well (radio button, etc.).  I also think about using a shift register to realize that the same information.  I used shift registers in the past and they can be annoying, but I also understand that you should stay away from variables.  Please pass along an Advisor on the use of local variables shift verse records.  THANKS in advance!

  I don't know what you defined as 'EVENT 1' to '3', but they seem to be quite the case.

  The use of shift registers sounds messy, but they are much better than local Variables If you parallel threads past in your code.

  Clean the threads between the shift registers is to use clusters.

  People of the country appear more clean, until they 'byte' you in the... code...

  EDIT: "they are much better than local Variables If you parallel threads going on in your code" I have to explain... If you have parallel code that uses Variables to local variables as this may lead to a race or conditions...

• Cluster vs multiple Shift Registers

  I had a question about good coding practices.

  Say you have several elements (numeric values, strings,... whatever) you need to iterate between the loops.

  Is it better to make a registry change for each item?
  Or cluster, and then move the cluster to a single shift register?

  It is faster than the other? Or better/worse for another reason?

  Cory,

  Yes.  and no.

  I usually create a large cluster of typedef I call indicators and flags (InF).  I put most of the things that need to be passed around with that.  The cluster of error, the State enum and large data tables are usually in separate shift registers.  Table L: shift registers and data are at the top of the loop and error and SRs of the State are at the bottom.  Most of the code goes between them.  Given the help of bundle/Unbundle documents name to which the data is used in a case.  The InF cluster is usually not displayed on the Panel before and may exist only in a Subvi to save space of block diagram.  The data are unbundled indicators as needed for display to the user.

  If you have a situation where speed is concerned, separate data that must be processed everything quickly and optimize for that.  Strings and arrays within the cluster probably cause some memory interesting distribution issues since they change size, that can be an argument in favour of that separates them.

  Lynn

• StateMachine in Subvi, restart shift registers

  Hello

  I'm having a problem with a reentrant Subvi, which implements a State Machine. The Subvi is called only once in the code, so problems with re-entrant execution concave/no is not the problem.

  The Subvi implements a State Machine whose output is a reference position for a drive motor. The state machine is implemented with while loop with shift registers. The Subvi is called once each control cycle (cycle being about milliseconds time), so that the State Machine while loop is executed once each cycle control (stop Terminal is connected to 'true'). And the shift registers are used to save data between executions.

  When I opened the main VI, it works perfectly. When I stop the VI and restart, the Subvi begins to use the last values of the previous main run of VI. I want that my position reference to start from 0. I guess my problem is that I should start the SubVIs shift registers.

  Is there a way to do this without adding any extra code? (Perhaps an invoke node functionality for the Subvi or something like that?)

  Thanks in advance for your help

  Best regards

  Pestana of Jesus

  Hi jespestana,

  I recommend adding a case of initialization.

  Mike

• 2 second pause between tracks in WMP

  How to change the default pause of 2 seconds between tracks in windows media player, when I burn a cd?  I want to burn copies of my group's live shows, but I don't want the noise of the crowd interrupted when securities change.

  Hi jason.sloan,.

  Thanks for posting answers.microsoft.com

  In response to your question, I'll move this to the Group of sounds and multimedia.  It is in relation to WMP so I this redirects to this community forum to have more responses from the community and MVP who review these groups of the forum.

  Just to give you an overview, WMP has 2 second gap between songs indicating the change of track.  If this delay wasn't the jump track would lead you at the end of the recording.

  There is a way to edit this shift, however, it is usually something that is sought in order to maintain differences in song and be able to distinguish between the pieces of music.

  Please let us know if information is required or if it helps to solve this problem.

  Kind regards

  Debbie
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Shift registers 'for' loop can accomidate how

  Hello

  I would like to know how shift registers we can add in for or while loop.

  Thanks in advance,

  Krishna

  Thanks for your quick reply Jarrod.

  Kind regards

  Krishna

• How can I clear the shift registers of sub for loop for each iteration of a larger loop?

  Hello

  I write a program to concatenate multiple text files.  However, I need to treat each column individually before they are concatenated.  I use one for a loop at normalze 6 columns choice the largest loop of concatenation.  However, the shift registers store data from previous iterations of the larger loop.  How can I clear the shift registers of the void loop based on the iteration of the larger loop?

  Thanks in advance!

  OK, that's fine. are there headers?

  In all cases, all you need to do is to place all of the 2D array in the shift register of the inner loop, iterate over the columns relevant to be normaized (use 'index array' to get the column it normalize, put it to help to "replace the subset of table".) You probably want to initialize the outer loop shift register. Use then "building the table" added to the beginning or the data of each file sets.

• Sort of the length of the sample segment longer that the iterations of the loop w/o shift registers?

  Hi all

  My loop runs about every s 0.06 and now I was prompted to add to program a function that will enjoy the latest 3 data and return the max/min value for two of the signals.  I can imagine a clumsy way by program to do this with SHIFT registers - take the max/min for each iteration, save-repeat-compare until you have enough iterations to fill 3 s of time.  But I can't help thinking there must be a cleaner way (better?) to do.

  Any help?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Try looking in a circular buffer.

  http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/tut/p/ID/7188

  Once you have determined how many times you put entries in the buffer, you will know exactly what is the size of a table to enter and do the Min/Max on.

  Another option is to use a circular table.

  http://decibel.NI.com/content/docs/doc-3414

  I would be created to operate somewhat like a Global functional or motor of the Action.   The Subvi would then be used in your loop DAQ for new data "stack."   Then called in another loop or part of your code to read every three seconds.

• Need help with while loop and shift registers

  I have a broad set of data and required to read data at maybe 200 samples at a time to process these samples through my VI and have add and concatenate a file separate lvm.  The part where I am confused is the shift registers. How can I limit the number of samples read in an iteration? How do the while loop to stop when all data are read in?

  I have attached my diagram, there may be something wrong with my technique?

  This will give you an idea.  There are a lot of other (probably more effective) methods.  It is a basic solution, quick and dirty to help you grasp the overall concept.

• Simplify the VI that rate but currently uses too many shift registers

  I have a VI that was made by the Director of scary movie, so beware, this VI is a nightmare!... or at least for me, it is.

  Background:

  I have 20 pans and I have a water level sensor that generates a voltage of 0 to 5 Volts Output. By knowing the volume of the Pan, I calibrated the output to be in gallons. Real output I need is a volumetric flow, i.e. gallons per minute per square foot. We currently is key this by using a VI that a filed summer internship (see table). It works well, but it's so dirty and difficult to clean up and expand. The plan is to have 100 total pans and I don't want to copy paste this code 5 times more!

  Issues related to the:

  -How can I earn a rate differently? If you notice on the attachment Subvi calibration, the rate is calculated manually knowing how fast the loop going in the main VI. I don't know if this is the best way

  -Can I get rid of the shift registers some how?

  Is there a way for me to combine the subVIs in calibration so that I don't have a Subvi for each channel?

  Thanks in advance!

  
  

• Shift registers loop when the chain is connected to the registers

  Hello everyone! I just need to know how these shifts of registers. For example a photo added, I have a stacked sequence structure. Some time ago in a loop with inside case structures. As you can see, there is registry to offset looping with initial string and on the right side of passage registry there is string "entry". So my question is when we run the VI, to check the error case it is going to start from initial case and then transmit the information to the case of entry into the structure of the case. So basically, I need to know how the shift registers can be used with the structures of the case and while loop.

  

  http://www.NI.com/Tutorial/9330/en/

  With this you can post a photo that is executable code.  For us looking at your code is not better than watching a photo with text in Notepad.

  That being said here is some information on shift registers.

  http://www.NI.com/getting-started/LabVIEW-Basics/shift-registers

  https://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361H-01/lvconcepts/shift_registers_concepts/

  To simplify your code, I highly recommend getting rid of the outer sequence structure.  Stacked sequence structures serve generally to cause new problems to users, and sequence variables compound which.  If you want the code to run before the main States are called, you can have a status of initializing in your state machine and do be more manageable.

• Uninitialized shift registers compiled in a DLL retain their values?

  Hello

  I'm using Labview 8.6 to create a DLL and then I create another Labview program that will call this DLL.  Within the DLL is a function called Untitled2 which is your basic uninitialized shift register.  It has a digital input which can be put in the shift register, and then I can read the number back.  After that I build it to the DLL and call it from another Labview program looks like registry of offset values are lost.  So, my question is whether Labview DLLs that contain uninitialized shift registers to the as registers of the SHIFT to retain their values?  I enclose a copy of Untitled2.vi so you can see my simple test vi.

  Does anyone know also - all good articles on the creation of DLLs in Labview?

  Thank you!

  Steve

  The short answer is the fastest is to call a VI a VI with a direct appeal. Any other way to do so is somehow above enveloping mechanism which means added. If you want to hear some details, you can read on.

  When a caller VI loads, it is "patched" with its subVIs. This means that he holds on a pointer in which he can use to call effectively than VI. The appellant also assigns a list of parameters for each call. When the call runs, the only thing the caller must do is to fill this list of parameters with the locations of their data and pass the pointer to this table in the code of the Subvi.

  When you call a VI that is embedded in a DLL, the call library node must all first set all parameters in the form provided by the convention call DLL. This is different from the approach of list for the parameter of LabVIEW and usually is to set each parameter on the processor stack. The function exported in the LabVIEW built DLL, must first obtain a connection to the VI to run. She accomplishes this by obtaining a reference VI of a cache of VI references created in the loaded DLL. Each VI reference has a list of parameters that should be filled in the settings for this call. It can then call the code. When the code is complete, there may be additional work to put the outputs in the form provided by the appellant. The VI reference must then be returned to the cache.

  So there will be several manipulation of the parameters in the call to a DLL and a couple of access to a cache may cause overhead and additional jitter include parallel calls. Even a call via a strict VI one reference would be faster. With whom you are in direct control of the VI reference so cache intervenes and the call puts the parameters directly from a list of parameters, the Subvi expected so there is less handling it.

  There are also several other limitations introduced by calling a VI in a DLL.

  1. If you are reporting to the DLL that contains the handles, then you must make sure that the DLL is called from never screw in the same version of LabVIEW. If you do not do this, then you will be allocated in a nursery memory to another instance handles and LabVIEW will stop.
  2. If you do not pass data containing the handles, then LabVIEW must make copies strings or arrays that are passed to the DLL, hindering more performance.
  3. Préallouée reentrancy is not available through dll. It's the kind of reentrancy, which allows the slot - VI maintain state specific to each caller. When it is called by a DLL, we have no idea where we are called to so we cannot give you a specific instance. Each VI reference in cache will be a specific instance of the VI but not sure which one you will get. Essentially, this makes it reentrant in dll screws act as shared reentrant. (Which could explain why it does not seem like your uninitialized register shift worked.)

  I hope this doesn't scare you use LabVIEW to create the dll. When you need to communicate to other software, this is the way to go and all of these steps are necessary to cross this limit. But if you're already in LabVIEW is not an ideal replacement to directly call a Subvi.

• Why can't I remove gaps between tracks when burning a disc with Media player?

  I have media player 11 but like all versions, he plays the album without gaps but when burn you it to a disc for the car he puts 3 second gaps between tracks, which ruins a live album! Am I missing something?

  Use it instead of WMP:

  http://CDBurnerXP.se/download?lang=en

  You should be able to make a CD smoothly. Otherwise his (expensive) Nero.

  See you soon,.

  Jerry

• Pause between tracks?

  In ripping a song from a CD in a music folder, the silence before the next song is included in the duration of the recording. For example, a record of 03:36 length is 4 seconds. of silence before the start of the next track. If the length of this recording (TRACK 1) is presented as 03:40 in the list of songs that I'm about to burn it to a CD. If I choose to have a pause of 2 seconds between tracks on the CD I want to burn, it will be the pause between TRACK 1 and TRACK 2 2 dry. or dry 6. ? In other words, Windows Media Player does not remove silence at the end of the runway before inserting the 2s pause?

  As far as I know, he burns the track as it is. I do not use to rip like, well well, is just not very well. There are some freeware like AudioGrabber.

  If she add seconds to the beginning of the track (or finish) then the easiest thing is to use an audio editor like Audacity (once again, freeware) to cut the silence off the beaten. That's how I do it, and at the same time you can "normalize" all tracks so that one is not too strong compared to others.

  See you soon,.

  Jerry

• Much more time gap between tracks using the latest firmware.

  Everyone has noticed there is now a gap of 5 or 6 seconds between tracks because they have updated their firmware to the latest version? It was about 1 second.

  Is it just me or is this a known problem? If the latter is their a workaround?

  Thank you very much in anticipation.

  ffa01 wrote:

  Everyone has noticed there is now a gap of 5 or 6 seconds between tracks because they have updated their firmware to the latest version? It was about 1 second.

  Is it just me or is this a known problem? If the latter is their a workaround?

  Thank you very much in anticipation.

  It's just you. Format you your memory internal after the update? This seems to be the last step in the realization of the full capacity of the update. My shortcomings are the same as before.