Should I apply a single to several L2L VPN VPN filter, or each VPN tunnel have their own VPN on an ASA filter?

Similar Questions

• ASA with several L2L VPN Dynamics

  I have an ASA 5510 such as VPN, used for about 30 L2L - VPN concentrator.

  I need also some VPN L2L with dynamic peer remote.

  While the configuration for a single dyn - VPN is quite simple (as described in several examples), how can I configure the ASA in the case of many dyn - VPN?

  Basically, all the VPN - dyn must use the same PSK (the DefaultL2LGroup).

  But using the "aggressive" on the remote peer mode, I could use a different PSK for every dyn - VPN:

  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes ABCD

  pre-shared-key *.

  This configuration is correct?

  Best regards

  Claudio

  Hello

  Maybe the solutions provided in the following document may also be an option to configure multiple dynamic VPN L2L connections on the SAA

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a0080bc7d13.shtml

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• I'm trying to create a PDF file with several signature lines in that anyone can "Sign" by using their digital signature CAC (Common Access Card) active. The goal is to have a single document that people can open, sign on a designated line and save the doc

  I'm trying to create a PDF file with several signature lines in that anyone can "Sign" by using their digital signature CAC (Common Access Card) active. The goal is to have a single document that people can open, sign on a designated line and save the document (replacing the existing document) and close. Then another person can open the same document digitally sign another area of the form, save it, and close it. So on, and so on. Is there a way to do this? At the end of the day, I would end up with a PDF file with literally hundreds of signatures to enable different ACC everywhere...

  I don't understand what the problem is. In the post of the davidr96549424 on May 8, 2015 07:58 you presented a structure of a correct document. Is the issue of the creation of this structure in a PDF file? For this, you will need an Acrobat, not reader.

  XI in Acrobat, select Tools-> forms-Edit. Click 'No' on the form fields 'detect '. In the tasks Panel that opens, click on "add new field". Select "Digital Signature" and move it to the location in the document where you want to than the appearance of the signature to be. Repeat that for signature fields as you want. Users will sign by clicking on the prepared unsigned signature field which shows the dialog box "sign. Do not forget that as TSN has noted that a digital signature applies to the entire document. The entry in the document where it is is irrelevant. Each next signature covers all previous signatures.

  Your users can also sign a document from anywhere that they want without signature fields already prepared. For this select fill & sign-> work with certificates and the type of signing you want to sign up with. A dialog box that will tell you a rectangle for the appearance of signature rises and after you draw the rectangle of the dialog 'Sign' rises.

  PDF/Acrobat doesn't have a limit on a number of signatures in a PDF document. But! Don't forget that when you open a PDF file with Acrobat/Reader signatures valid all of them and takes time (several seconds - until 10 - for every signature), so if you have several signatures of dozens of their validation open can take a long time.

  I don't know how build you your workflow so that each person signs the same PDF and saves it. Economy runs on the same computer where the PDF is stored. You'll have to decide how to allow different people to have access to the same PDF. They, of course, you may sign this only one-at-a-time PDF.

• How can I apply an action to several images in CS5?

  How can I automatically apply an action to several images in CS5?

  Hello, welcome to the forum.

  If you are talking about a Photoshop action, you can use bridge, select the files and use the tools > Photoshop > batch, or, if you need also to save in different formats, tools > Photoshop > image processor.

  

• Apply 1 FX to several tracks?

  Is it possible to apply FX to several tracks at once? I have 15 clips I want to compress, but so far I have to apply the same FX for each of them individually. Thank you

  You could either apply the effect of compression to the master output and send mixed titles or assign channels to a Bus where you place the compressor. Otherwise Yes you must apply individually. Because each track will have different audio in any case you would need to adjust compressor settings separately anyway.

• Configure several IPSec VPN between Cisco routers

  I would like to create multiple ipsec VPN between 3 routers. Before applying it, I would like to check on the config I wrote to see if it works. It's just on RouterA configuration for virtual private networks to RouterB, and RouterC.

  As you can apply in a cyptomap by interface, I say with the roadmap, that it should be able to manage traffic for both routers. Or is there a better way to do it?

  RouterA - 1.1.1.1

  RouterB - 2.2.2.2

  RouterC - 3.3.3.3

  RouterA

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key RouterB address 2.2.2.2

  ISAKMP crypto keys RouterC address 3.3.3.3

  invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP

  ISAKMP crypto keepalive 5 10 periodicals

  ISAKMP crypto nat keepalive 30

  !

  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set AES - SHA esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

  !

  outsidemap 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined peer 2.2.2.2

  game of transformation-AES-SHA

  match address 222

  outsidemap 30 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined peer 3.3.3.3

  game of transformation-AES-SHA

  match address 333

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  Description * Internet *.

  NAT outside IP

  outsidemap card crypto

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/1

  Description * LAN *.

  IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  !

  IP nat inside source map route RouterA interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload

  !

  access-list 222 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 223 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 223 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  access-list 333 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 334 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 334 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  !

  RouterA route map permit 10

  corresponds to the IP 223 334

  Hi Chris,

  The two will remain active.

  The configuration you have is for several ste VPN site is not for the redundant VPN.

  The config for the redundant VPN is completely different allows so don't confuse is not with it.

  In the redundant VPN configuration both peers are defined in the same card encryption.

  Traffic that should be passed through the tunnel still depend on the access list, we call in the card encryption.

  This access-lsist is firstly cheked and as a result, the traffic is passed through the correct tunnel

  HTH!

  Concerning

  Regnier

  Please note all useful posts

• L2l VPN with IPSEC NAT

  Hi all!

  I have a question about L2L VPN and NAT.

  Can I set up the VPN tunnel between two ASAs or routers using the NAT translation from within the private IP addresses to a single public IP address outside the interface and then implement interesting crypto with the source of the public IP address and the destination of the remote private network on the other end (also ASA). For example, I want to translate a private network to the public ip address at one end and use the VPN tunnel with a public IP address as the source. Policy-NAT is not an option, because we really do not want to provide any IP address to the remote end, and IP addresses of the remote end can overlap with our end.

  Thank you!

  Hello

  You can definitely set up an IPSec tunnel between two devices in the translation of your subnet in a single public IP address. You just create the translation and as you mentioned define interesting traffic using the public IP address.

  This is exactly what we call political NAT, I don't understand why you say that NAT policy is not an option. Perhapps you misunderstood concept NAT policy or I misunderstood your question.

  For example, assuming that the LAN private at your side is 172.16.1.0/24, the remote subnet is 192.168.150.0/24, and that the public IP address that you want to use is 200.200.200.200 your NAT config should look like this:

  access-list 199 permit ip 172.16.1.0 255.255.252.0 192.168.150.0 255.255.255.0

  Global (outside) 6 200.200.200.200

  NAT (inside) 6 access-L199

  Which would be NAT traffic to the public IP address only when the traffic matches the ACL.

  Your ACL crypto should then be something like

  cryptomap list of allowed access host ip 200.200.200.200 192.168.150.0 255.255.255.0

  That would hide your address real and all they see is the public IP address you give them. Note that since the NAT takes place on your side your side will be able to raise the tunnel.

  I hope this helps.

  Raga

• When we sell our software we want to remove our volume licensing, the buyer can apply to their own license. This procedure is possible?

  * Original title: Volume License

  The company that I work uses several virtual machines of windows volume licenses.  When we sell our software we want to remove our volume licensing, the buyer can apply to their own license.  This procedure is possible?

  Yes, just remove the virtual machines.

  You can even uninstall the product key.

  Click Start, type: CMD
  Right-click on CMD
  Click on run as administrator
  At the command prompt, type: slmgr.vbs - upk

  Press enter, this will uninstall the product key of the computer and to the evaluation mode, you are now free to use it on another computer.

• Several outbound VPN connections behind PIX-515E

  I will take a PIX-515E off-site for a provision of access internet location. I have several people behind this PIX, who will have to return to the same Office VPN. One person can VPN through the PIX very well, but if someone else tries to VPN they cannot. Once the first person has disconnected for 10 minutes, then the next person can connect. I activated the NAT - T and added fixup protocol esp-ike. What can I do it wrong? Thank you.

  fixup protocol esp-ike - allows PAT to (ESP), one tunnel.

  Please remove this correction.

  If the remote site has NAT - T enabled, then you should be able to use NAT - T and more than 1 user should be able to use behind the PIX VPN client.

  See you soon

  Gilbert

• Should I wear to the front through a VPN

  I currently have a Cisco 1905 as my hub router, running v15.1 (4) M4. (192.168.1.0/24)

  This router has a static public IP address on interface GI0/0 and the internal address is enabled GI0/1 and we use NAT for Internet access.

  I have an ASA5505 (v8 (4)) Branch (192.168.12.0/24) connection to the router with EZVPN and the VPN is setup and works as it should.

  I can access the branch out of the hub and vice versa.

  I have a security camera in the branch that I can access through the VPN without problem.

  The problem occurs when I try to access the camera from the internet using port forwarding.

  We have several camera in the Office of hub that we access using via the following command port forwarding

  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.40 80 40001-stretch SDM_RMAP_1 route map

  It works 100%

  I tried to access the camera in the Office using the command

  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.12.40 80 41001-stretch SDM_RMAP_1 route map

  but I can't get through.

  I can see the NAT translation in the branch for the port 41001, but I'm not through.

  Is this possible? should I wear to the front in a VPN tunnel?

  The problems is that the branch office is an Office suite and we rent space. We are not provided a public ip address and I have no control over the router providing an address in the ASA5505.

  Any help would be appreciated thanks

  If you have crypto-cards running and you prefer split tunneling, then I suggest a completely different way to resolve that:

  You can install a small linux box (or Win2012R2 will also do the job) in the main exercise (better would an own DMZ for that) and set up as an agent reverse. This system takes requests and passes them to the cameras.

• L2l VPN tunnel is reset during the generate a new IPSec key

  I have a tunnel VPN L2L that resets completely, start with Phase 1, at the expiration of the timer of the IPSec Security Association.  Although there are several SAs, it always resets all of the tunnel.

  I see the following in the log errors when this happens:

  03/06/2013 12:54:41 Local7.Notice ipRemoved June 3, 2013 12:54:41 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % 713050-5-ASA: Group = ipRemoved, IP = ipRemoved, completed for the ipRemoved peer connection.  Reason: Peer terminate Proxy remote n/a, Proxy Local n/a

  03/06/2013 12:54:41 Local7.Notice ipRemoved June 3, 2013 12:54:41 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % 713259-5-ASA: Group = ipRemoved, IP = ipRemoved, Session is be demolished. Reason: The user has requested

  03/06/2013 12:54:41 Local7.Warning ipRemoved June 3, 2013 12:54:41 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % ASA-4-113019: Group = ipRemoved username = ipRemoved, IP = ipRemoved, disconnected Session. Session type: IKE, duration: 4 h: 00 m: 06 s, xmt bytes: 260129, RRs bytes: 223018, reason: the user has requested

  03/06/2013 12:55:33 Local7.Notice ipRemoved June 3, 2013 12:55:33 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % 713041-5-ASA: IP = ipRemoved, IKE initiator: New Phase 1, Intf inside, IKE Peer ipRemoved local Proxy 204.139.127.24 address, address remote Proxy 156.30.21.200, Card Crypto (L2LVPN)

  03/06/2013 12:55:33 Local7.Notice ipRemoved June 3, 2013 12:55:33 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % 713119-5-ASA: Group = ipRemoved, IP = ipRemoved, PHASE 1 COMPLETED

  Local7.Notice ipRemoved June 3, 2013 03/06/2013-12:55:33 12:55:33 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % 713049-5-ASA: Group = ipRemoved, IP = ipRemoved, the security negotiation is complete for LAN - to - LAN Group (ipRemoved) initiator, Inbound SPI = 0x9213bdc9, outbound SPI = 0x1799a099

  03/06/2013 12:55:33 Local7.Notice ipRemoved June 3, 2013 12:55:33 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % 713120-5-ASA: Group = ipRemoved, IP = ipRemoved, PHASE 2 COMPLETED (msgid = b8a47603)

  03/06/2013 13:02:11 Local7.Notice ipRemoved June 3, 2013 13:02:11 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % 713041-5-ASA: Group = ipRemoved, IP = ipRemoved, IKE initiator: New Phase 2, Intf inside, IKE Peer ipRemoved local Proxy 204.139.127.71 address, address remote Proxy 156.30.21.200, Card Crypto (L2LVPN)

  Local7.Notice ipRemoved June 3, 2013 03/06/2013-13:02:11 13:02:11 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % 713049-5-ASA: Group = ipRemoved, IP = ipRemoved, the security negotiation is complete for LAN - to - LAN Group (ipRemoved) initiator, Inbound SPI = 0x93f9be6c, outbound SPI = 0x1799a16d

  03/06/2013 13:02:11 Local7.Notice ipRemoved June 3, 2013 13:02:11 LKM-NVP-L2L-01: % 713120-5-ASA: Group = ipRemoved, IP = ipRemoved, PHASE 2 COMPLETED (msgid = 1f6c9acd)

  Any thoughts on why she would do that?

  Thank you.

  Jason

  Hello

  Both the log messages seems to suggest that the remote end is closed/compensation connection.

  Is this a new connection that suffer from this problem or has it started on an existing connection?

  The Cisco documentation associated with the Syslog messages does really not all useful information about these log messages.

  I guess that your problem is that TCP by L2L VPN connections suffer from the complete renegotiations of the L2L VPN.

  I wonder if the following configuration can help even if this situation persists

  Sysopt preserve-vpn-flow of connection

  Here is a link to the order of the ASA reference (8, 4-8, 6 software) with a better explanation of this configuration.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa84/command/reference/S8.html#wp1538395

  It is not enabled by default on the SAA.

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• Cisco ASA l2l VPN disorder

  Hello Experts from Cisco,

  I run in trouble with one of my l2l ipec vpn between an asa 5510 and 5520 cisco running version 8.2.2.

  Our existing l2l VPN are connected fine and work very well. Currently SITE a (10.10.0.0/16) connects to the SITE B (10.20.0.0/16). SITE A connects to SITE C (10.100.8.0/21). These are OK.

  What is a failure is when I try to connect SITE B to SITE C. The tunnel coming up and phase 1 and 2 complete successfully. However, even if in the course of execution: ' entry packet - trace within the icmp 10.20.8.2 8 0 detailed 10.100.8.1 ' I get the following:

  Phase: 10

  Type: VPN

  Subtype: encrypt

  Result: DECLINE

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Direct flow from returns search rule:

  ID = 0xad1c4500, priority = 70, domain = encrypt, deny = false

  hits = 609, user_data = 0 x 0, cs_id = 0xad1c2e10, reverse, flags = 0 x 0 = 0 protocol

  SRC ip = 10.20.0.0, mask is 255.255.0.0, port = 0

  DST ip = 10.100.8.0, mask is 255.255.248.0, port = 0, dscp = 0 x 0

  I noticed that when the tunnel came, the road to 10.100.8.0/21 was added in the routing table and cyrpto what ACL has not been applied on the SAA remote. I added the route manually but cannot get the cryto ACL to apply.

  Useful info:

  C SITE

  the object-group NoNatDMZ-objgrp network

  object-network 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0

  object-network 10.10.12.0 255.255.255.0

  network-object 10.20.0.0 255.255.0.0

  access extensive list ip 10.100.8.0 outside_30_cryptomap allow 255.255.248.0 10.20.0.0 255.255.0.0

  IP 10.100.8.0 allow Access - list extended sheep 255.255.248.0 sheep-objgrp object-group

  card crypto outside_map 30 match address outside_30_cryptomap

  card crypto outside_map 30 peers set x.x.x.x

  crypto outside_map 30 card value transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA

  crypto outside_map 30 card value reverse-road

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  SITE B

  object-group network sheep-objgrp

  object-network 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0

  object-network 10.21.0.0 255.255.0.0

  object-network 10.10.12.0 255.255.255.0

  network-object 10.100.8.0 255.255.248.0

  IP 10.20.0.0 allow Access - list extended sheep 255.255.0.0 sheep-objgrp object-group

  allow outside_50_cryptomap to access extended list ip 10.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.100.8.0 255.255.248.0

  card crypto outside_map 50 match address outside_50_cryptomap

  game card crypto outside_map 50 peers XX. XX. XX. XX

  outside_map crypto 50 card value transform-set ESP-AES256-SHA

  outside_map crypto 50 card value reverse-road

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  I've been struggling with this these days. Any help is very appreciated!

  Thank you!!

  Follow these steps:

  no card outside_map 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map

  map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map

  clear crypto ipsec its SITE_B_Public peer

  Try again and attach the same outputs.

  Let me know.

  Thank you.

• When I'm accommodating the toolbar of the new option to arrange the icons on the toolbar toolbar change several tools come with the words "wrong tool" and have no icon associated with them. What are these missing tools 'bad '?

  When I'm accommodating the toolbar of the new option to arrange the icons on the toolbar toolbar change several tools come with the words "wrong tool" and have no icon associated with them. What are these missing tools 'bad '?

  I see you have fixed this now, but I was about to tell you that you could have accommodated in the 'Bad' by its shortcut "I" tool.

  

  To save a custom toolbar, get everything the way you want and click on the button space work, click new workspace

  

  Type a name for the workspace, and check all three options.

  

  If I have to use a single screen, I use a variant of the Essentials workspace with minor panels collapsed and dock for main panels.  I call this Essentials 2

  

  It also seems to me that with all these options, it's stupid not to take full advantage of them, so I separate my most used instruments for their own group and double column toolbar to adjust the screen.  I tried to drop in the groups for the most used tool near the document image (right). I love it, but it take some time remembering the new positions.

  

• There should be a limitation or personal parental control on hotspot. Children feel obliged to allow their friends to use their hotspot. And the parents who pay for it!

  There should be a limitation or personal parental control on hotspot. Children feel obliged to allow their friends to use their hotspot. And the parents who pay for it!

  This is a user to user support forum, so there is really nothing anyone here can do for you, I'm afraid.

  However, you can send your comments Apple

  http://www.Apple.com/feedback/

• apply the equation of variable step size lms filter

  Hello world

  can someone apply equation of step size for lms size filter variable step using labview. snapshot of the equation is attached with question

  Yes I can - can you?

  Sorry to say, but nobody here is going to write your code for you. You have to have a go at it and then you can ask questions when / if you get stuck.

  The LabVIEW basics are a good place to start if you are really new to LabVIEW.

  -CC