SQL version 12 c forms

Small question:

What version of sql is running forms 12 c?

Long version:

We have a form application of 11g (with database 11g of forms)

We want to test 12 c and 12 c database forms

We have set up a database of 12 c, but has a few problems compiling with WM_CONCAT. We solved easily to server-side rewrite the sentences of sql (using the LISTAGG) and leave it that way for future migration.

The problem: Forms 11g does not support the LISTAGG (like many other sql and pl 'new' functions). No problem, we can wait until this date future migration, but... Made to support 12 c listagg function?

Thank you.

Listagg was introduced in the 11g database. As analytc as it did not fit 11g. I didn't try it in 12 c, but if the .dll Version numbers are trustworthy the plsql.dll is always Version 11 to 12 forms, so I think that it still does not. In any case, I wouldn't mind a lot and use a view of your statement containing listagg.

See you soon

Tags: Oracle Development

Similar Questions

  • How can I use SQL to check the Version of Oracle Forms and object of the request?

    Hi all:

    How can I use SQL to check the Version of Oracle Forms and object of the request?





    Concerning
    Terry

    Terry,

    See the following threads/docs for the version of forms.

    How to find the developer version
    Re: How to find the developer version

    Note: 466890.1 - Script to find the Apache, Java, Jinitiator, version of forms and details of the JVM for Oracle E-Business Suite 11i
    Note: 392793.1 - how to get Forms Oracle Oracle Applications 11i Command Line Version
    Note: 468311.1 - Script to find the Apache, Java, JRE, Forms for Oracle E-Business Suite R12 version

    What purpose are you talking?

    Thank you
    Hussein

  • I downloaded the latest version, but the form page tells me to download the latest version and does not display the form

    I downloaded the latest version, but the form page tells me to download the latest version and does not display the form!

    Ok. Chrome has stopped supporting the player plug-in (for now). You'll want to download the forms by placing the cursor on the link, right click and check-in at your computer. Alternatively, you can try another browser such as Internet Explorer.

  • learning SQL and pssql, xml, forms and report

    I learned sql and plsql I donot Xml and forms and reports learn by own by easy method

    by sql and psql we learned basic on the rise, things of time ranging from online book (another way to practice and understand the concepts)

    repo, xml, sql, forms and pssql of learning javascript:; rt learning SQL and pssql, xml, forms and reportfor beginners

  • form was created by an older version of the form builder

    I developed my form using Forms 10 g (9.0.4.0.19 (Production)) and when he kept on the application server.

    After that, I used my forms to uprgrade forms migration assistant... .the 932 kb resulting file converted to a 500 k file...

    I then used the compiler forms

    where in I specified the name of the fmb file... has given the username, the pwd and the string for the database...

    and I see even a compiled fmx copy into folder...

    but when I try to run on I get it

    form was created by an older version of the form builder

    I want that my forms are converted 10.1.2.0.2 production so that i can host the application on the server

    Published by: Chase Suhail on February 8, 2011 23:37

    Hello

    Sources (.fmb) must be built on computer target to generate a binary compatible (.fmx).

    François

  • Versions of the form

    If I have a form that contains 5 fields and in two weeks, I'm going in and adding more than 2 fields, when I do thachange in t is a new version of the form created? If so where do I go to see older versions of this form?

    You must explicitly create a new version of the form. Right-click and select history to see the different versions.

    Jasmine

  • How to get the Version of the form

    Hi gurus,

    Is there any function in forms or medium through which I can get versions of the form?

    Thanks in advance.
    Anand

    If below the answer helped you then, mark it as useful/correct an answer...

    declare
    v varchar2 (1000);
    Start
    v: = Get_Application_Property (version);
    message (v);
    message (v);
    end;

    Write the code above in a times-new-form-Instance of the form, you will get the solution...

  • different SQL versions in sites

    I am about to install SRM and asked that the databases will be created. The database administrator asks me if it is OK to use different versions of
    MS SQL at both sites, 2005 SP4 and 2008R2. It is a requirement that the same version of the database is used at each site. ?

    Databases may be different, as long as both are supported by SRM-

  • Number of SQL Version in AWR and child cursor

    Hello
    In 11.1.0.7, which is Version SQL count in AWR report? What it means? and how oracle performs this version? How do we define child cursor?

    Thank you

    Hello

    Take a look at http://viveklsharma.wordpress.com/2009/09/12/ql/

    Concerning
    Anand

  • Get the version of the forms to runtinme

    Hello
    I need to check the version of forms which the running form has been compiled. How can I get this information in Oracle Forms 4.5?

    There is at least one on 10 g http://www.oracle.com/webapps/online-help/forms/10g/state?navSetId=_&navId=3&vtTopicFile=f1_help/builtg/getappli.html&vtTopicId=

    get_application_property(version);
    

    I have no documentation 4.5 online now, you might want to look at the documentation that comes with your installation to see if it works in 4.5 too.

    see you soon

  • Disable an Active Version in the FORM DESIGNER

    I activated a version before you define a new field pre-fill in tab.

    When I try to add, it says that the version is active, we cannot add/remove/change anything.

    is there a way I can disable the version so that I can add some fields.

    My version of the IOM is 9.1.0.1860.16

    I activated without knowing
    : User AD form
    VERSION: 9.0.4.1.c

    He turned off all the controls.


    Thank you.

    Published by: 833417 on February 17, 2011 17:07

    Click create new Version
    Name this new Version (user-defined)
    Select this version (click not now do Active Version).
    Make the changes,
    Save the form, and click Version Active.

  • How to find version EBS 11i forms/States

    Hi gurus.

    one of my colleague asked me to know forms/States version 11i system on Linux OS.


    Thank you

    Please check, hope this helps.

    http://www.onlineappsschool.com/getHowToDocDetails.php?id=1

    Log in as user appliatin

    then enter "f60gen" on Forms Server

    first line says forms version,

    applvisn@oraapp01:~ > f60gen help = y
    6.0 forms (form of the compiler) Version 6.0.8.28.0 (Production)

    Forms 6.0 (compiler form): Release-Production

    (c) Copyright 1999 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.

    Published by: Amigo on December 20, 2010 18:03

  • My SQL query is well-formed?

    Schema:

    CARS (* cid *, - mi-, CLA)
    BUYERS (* offer *, Boss, city, age)
    MANUFACTURERS (* maname *, location)
    MODELS (* middle *, maname- model)
    SELLERS (* sid *, sname, years_employed)
    TRANSACTIONS (* - tender-*, * - cid-*, * - sid-*, quantity, day, month, year)

    * represents a pk
    -represents a fk
    * - to represent the fk and pk at the same time

    Q. print the SIDS of all of the vendors who sold both a Ford and Toyota in 1997.

    I wrote the request in the form:

    Select s.sid
    s sellers
    Join transactions t on t.sid = s.sid
    Join cars c on c.cid = t.cid
    Models join m on m.mid = c.mid
    where t.year = 1997 and (m.maname = 'Ford' and m.maname = 'Toyota');


    The assignment source: http://sandbox.mc.edu/~gwiggins/syllabi/csc415/SQL-HMWK-F99.html

    Published by: user11164565 on July 28, 2009 05:32

    No need for the subquery if marks are not needed, because they are already known:

    select s.sid
    from salespeople s
    join transactions t on t.sid = s.sid
    join cars c on c.cid = t.cid
    join models m on m.mid = c.mid
    where t.year = 1997 m.maname in ('Ford','Toyota')
    group by s.sid having count(distinct m.maname) > 1;
    
  • PL/SQL reqd 4 Oracle forms developer certification?

    Hello

    I want to learn the forms and reports. I want to learn & then go to the certification.

    But for this knowledge of PL/SQL is necessary?

    Or are that they both are completely different (unrelated)?

    Thank you...

    From a research perspective:

    Forms and reports use the language pl/sql for improved treatment.

    Usually you will encounter it in forms that reports.

    However most of the methods study of forms will guide you in first bits of pl/sql

    Accreditation, navigating the site: [http://www.oracle.com/education/certification] for more information authorities.

    In the practice of forms of Certification you will first need a certifaction OCA PL/SQL. So in practice, you will first need to go:

    (1) 1z0-007 or 1z0-051 (or 1z0 - 047... this possibly being a more difficult exam... search messages on this forum).

    (2) 1z0-147 (or 1z0 - 144, which is currently in beta).

    Before taking 1z0-141.

    If the thing of Classe reviews please read the faq and the items at the top of this forum and does not leaning unauthorized material.

    Rgds - bigdelboy

  • Many SQL version when cusor_sharing on similar

    Hello

    my version of db 9.2.0.8
    query v$ sqlare shows a lot of sql have the same hash_value, but they do not share
    performance is not degraded, LATCH FREE and activity cache libarary aren't on top of things yet, but hundreds of sql have version_count > 500

    most of these sql literal dfferent and not using bind var...

    system in cusor_sharing for similar, no histogram is collected against this tables

    Select * from v$ sql_shared_cursor where address = 'address these SQL', does not return anything.

    It has rows in v$ sql_shared_cursor, but some sql_text from v$ sql where address in (select address from v$ sql_shared_cursor), shows nothing



    SQL_TEXT
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ADDRESS COUNT (*)
    ---------------- ----------
    Select count (*) in the p_aaa WHERE period_time > = TO_DATE(:"SYS_B_0",:"SYS_B_1") and period_time < TO_DATE(:"SYS_B_2",:"SYS_B_3")
    C0000002123337F8 702

    Select count (*) in the p_bbb WHERE period_time > = TO_DATE(:"SYS_B_0",:"SYS_B_1") and period_time < TO_DATE(:"SYS_B_2",:"SYS_B_3")
    C00000021CF43E08 718


    SQL > parameter sharing

    VALUE OF TYPE NAME
    ------------------------------------ -------------------------------- ------------------------------
    CURSOR_SHARING similar string


    Select * from v$ sql_shared_cursor
    where
    UNBOUND_CURSOR = 'Y' or
    SQL_TYPE_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    OPTIMIZER_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    OUTLINE_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    STATS_ROW_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    LITERAL_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    SEC_DEPTH_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    EXPLAIN_PLAN_CURSOR = 'Y' or
    BUFFERED_DML_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    PDML_ENV_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    INST_DRTLD_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    SLAVE_QC_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    TYPECHECK_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    AUTH_CHECK_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    BIND_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    DESCRIBE_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    LANGUAGE_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    TRANSLATION_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    ROW_LEVEL_SEC_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    INSUFF_PRIVS = 'Y' or
    INSUFF_PRIVS_REM = 'Y' or
    REMOTE_TRANS_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    LOGMINER_SESSION_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    INCOMP_LTRL_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    OVERLAP_TIME_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    SQL_REDIRECT_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    MV_QUERY_GEN_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    USER_BIND_PEEK_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    TYPCHK_DEP_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    NO_TRIGGER_MISMATCH = 'Y' or
    FLASHBACK_CURSOR = 'Y' or
    LITREP_COMP_MISMATCH = 'Y '.

    only 5 rows returned marked BIND_MISMATCH = 'Y', all the other thousands of lines return with all the columns marked "n".

    How can I determine why these instruction are not shared?

    Thank you

    BR/ricky

    It is expected - behaviours although it may seem a little extreme in your case.
    With cursor_sharing = similar, the documentation says something like "the cursor will be re-optimized if there is reason to believe that the incoming values could make a difference in the execution path".

    In practice, this means that if you use predicates of range based (as you have) or have a predicate with equality on a column with a histogram then Oracle will do the bind variable conversion still re - optimize instruction for each different set of the value that you use:

    Here is a small sample to demonstrate the effect. It creates a table with data and then runs three slightly different queries, a different number of times each. All three queries the same appearance after substitution to bind variables, but we always get three sliders to child because we have three sets of entries:

    drop table t1;
    
    create table t1 (n1 number, d1 date, v1 varchar2(15));
    
    insert into t1
    select
         rownum,
         trunc(sysdate,'yyyy') + rownum - 1,
         lpad(rownum,10)
    from
         all_objects
    where
         rownum <= 500
    ;
    
    begin
         dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(
              ownname           => user,
              tabname           =>'T1',
              partname      => null,
              estimate_percent => 100,
              block_sample       => true,
              method_opt
                      => 'for all columns size 1',
              degree           => null
         );
    end;
    /
    
    alter session set cursor_sharing = similar;
    
    select     /*+ FIND IT */
         *
    from     t1
    where     d1 >= (to_date('15-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    and     d1 <  (to_date('18-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    ;
    
    select     /*+ FIND IT */
         *
    from     t1
    where     d1 >= (to_date('16-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    and     d1 <  (to_date('17-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    ;
    
    select     /*+ FIND IT */
         *
    from     t1
    where     d1 >= (to_date('01-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    and     d1 <  (to_date('07-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    ;
    
    select     /*+ FIND IT */
         *
    from     t1
    where     d1 >= (to_date('15-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    and     d1 <  (to_date('18-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    ;
    
    select     /*+ FIND IT */
         *
    from     t1
    where     d1 >= (to_date('16-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    and     d1 <  (to_date('17-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    ;
    
    select     /*+ FIND IT */
         *
    from     t1
    where     d1 >= (to_date('15-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    and     d1 <  (to_date('18-Jan-2008','dd-mon-yyyy'))
    ;
    
    alter session set cursor_sharing = exact;
    
    spool similar_02
    
    select
         hash_value, child_number, executions
    from
         v$sql
    where
         sql_text like '%FIND IT%'
    and     sql_text not like '%v$sql%'
    ;
    
    spool off
    

    This is the output of the query on v$ sql - note that we have three child sliders, and they each used a different number of times, corresponding to three series of values above:

    HASH_VALUE CHILD_NUMBER EXECUTIONS
    ---------- ------------ ----------
    3368893937            0          3
    3368893937            1          2
    3368893937            2          1
    

    The only good (Although potentially difficult) answer to this problem is to use cursor_sharing = force to the front-end server, and then get the code front to review the size of the date range you want to select and choose one of a small number of different SQL statements that you design to suit different sizes of date ranges.

    However, 11 g, the optimizer is supposed to deal with this type of problem automatically through 'sharing of the adjustment slider.

    Concerning
    Jonathan Lewis
    http://jonathanlewis.WordPress.com
    http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.UK

    "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." Stephen Hawking.

Maybe you are looking for