Start several Instances of ABC to a single Instance of the EBS provider

Similar Questions

• Several instance to the same server with same ORACLE_HOME and same SID

  Hello gurus, reduce costs my company looks to reduce the backup servers and the databases consolidade waiting on big 2 or 3 servers to reduce oracle licenses.
  It is that I have about 30 cases with SID same how to configure it to run as 10 instances with the same SID, ORACLE_HOME in the same machine? is this possible?
  
  will run oracle on unix HP - UX 11r2
  
  BR
  
  TI

  Right. Each database will have own SID. With multiply tnsnames.ora and listener.ora all have entries for each standby.

  If the folder structure is different from primary then the DB_FILE_NAME_CONVERT and LOG_FILE_NAME_CONVERT parameters are used to convert to the new locations.
  These two taking input in two, the front of the location and the location after.

  Example:

  DB_FILE_NAME_CONVERT=('/u01/app/oracle/oradata/RECOVER2', '/u01/app/oracle/oradata/RECLONE','/u01/oradata/RECOVER2','/u01/oradata/RECLONE')
  LOG_FILE_NAME_CONVERT=('/u01/app/oracle/flash_recovery_area/RECOVER2', '/u01/app/oracle/flash_recovery_area/RECLONE')
  

  Standby for each primary SID can be all that you need. The DB_NAME parameter would be the same on both, but DB_UNIQUE_NAME would be different.

  Who is?

  So, if I have two PRIMARY and standby database, Eve will have its own password, its own file INIT file to its own directory structure (but it could be the same).

  Best regards

  mseberg

• Block several Instance of the form

  Hai all,
  
  
  In forms 6i, we can block the opening of a single multiple-instance form within the same application?
  
  
  
  Kind regards
  
  Manu

  If you are inside forms one-'instance', and if you are using OPEN_FORM to navigate in the menu of other forms, then you can use FIND_FORM and GO_FORM for your condition. But that won't help if the module forms runs in a different application forms.

• Latest patches of CPU for HOUSES 10.1.2 & 10.1.3 on an Instance of the EBS

  I would like to apply the patches to the CPU 10.1.2 10.1.3 homes of a BSE instance, but I am not quiet sure on the steps which are refferred in respective patches Readme files. Could someone help me please to find the right measures?

  Latest CPU patches:

  10.1.2 ORACLE_HOME - 12837860

  10.1.3 IAS_HOME - 16802901

  Environment:

  EBS R12 (12.1.3)

  DB 11.2.0.4

  Steps required on 10.1.2 HOME:

  https://updates.Oracle.com/Orion/services/download?type=Readme & Aru = 14140154 #CBBEIHIE

  Article 3, before Installation and procedures information

  Make sure that all the pre-reqs are met.

  Section 6, CPUOct2011 installation in the home of medium level

  step 2) unzip p12837860_10123_ < platform > .zip

  CD 12837860

  napply opatch

  Steps required on HOST 10.1.3:

  https://updates.Oracle.com/Orion/services/download?type=Readme & Aru = 16413450 #CBBEIHIE

  Section 4, put the CPUJul2013 in the average home

  step 1) unzip p16802901_101350_ < platform > .zip

  CD 16802901

  napply opatch

  Thank you

  Moore

  Hi Moore,

  Step 4, said about Oracle HTTP server... but 10.1.2 HOME is not any http running of the service. -hope, it is not necessary.

  Step 5, I'm not sure this step either.

  
  

  You only need to perform these steps.

  Well, I think that this step is applicable.

  
  

  Good - only if CPUJul2012 or later has not been previously applied.

  Thank you

  Hussein

• What is the best way to run multiple instances of the class containing infinite while loop?

  Hello

  I have a several instances of the class (say a, b, c,...) that have the same parent and I want to run the same methods overridden to all instances in parallel.

  For example:

  a.init ()-> a.run ()-> a.stop ()-> a.run ()-> a.stop ()->

  b.init ()-> b.run ()-> b.stop ()->->->

  c.init() ->           ->             -> c.run() ->               -> c.stop()

  ...

  See the attachment for more details.

  The problems are now:

  1. the 'run' - method does not return until it receives the external trigger

  2. everything to run methods return in a different time

  1 chip means I can't use autoindexed for loop because in this case b.run () will have to wait before the end of a.run (), right? Is it possible to run to the loop in parallel?

  2 chip means that an object must be able to run and stop independently from others.

  What is the most elegant solution? The solution copy - paste in the attachment works for 3 instances, but there are currently 10 and more is coming.

  Juha

  In fact, what I wanted to know was "how to add the 'P' loop '... Easy, after you ask the right question.

  In the attachment, there is a test.vi that has two numerical indicators in a certain time-infinite loops. If I leave the parallelism, the two digital are incremented infinitely. If I don't allow parallelism, only the first is incremented (he never leaves the infinite while loop).

  To solve my original problem, I can make an init-start-stop branch within a loop-parallel-indexing for and make sure that there are the same number of instances of loop as there are objects in my array of objects (object array is an autoindexed in the loop for).

  Also good point about the vis environment. I should also add that.

• Can VMware Player run multiple instances of the same VM?

  I looked around but could find an answer to this question. If it has already been answered, please feel free to point me to that answer. I am relatively new to VMware Player, so this may seem like a stupid question. Please bear with me.

  I've been running Linux in a virtual machine using VMware Player 5.0.2 on Win7 and I would like to start another instance of the same virtual machine, simultaneously. When I try to launch the image once again, VMware asks if I want to take possession of the virtual machine running, but does not give the opportunity to start another instance.

  Is it because it is not possible to run two instances of the same VM, or y at - it another way to get there?

  Welcome to the community,

  This can be done. If another instance would be allowed to use the same file system, the guest operating system would be very likely corrupt the file system. What is possible - at least with VMware Workstation - is to create clones related, where the Basic virtual disk is the same (open in read-only mode), but writes go to independent virtual disk files.

  André

• Can't swap multiple instances of the same symbol

  Hey!

  So, I can select a symbol and exchange with one another, but why can't I just Exchange several instances of the same symbol?

  A useless limitation don't y ' All think?

  -Dwayne

  If you're talking about the replacement of one symbol by another of the library, which is limited to one symbol at a time.  But you can extend this functionality using JSFL.  Here is a link to a tool that might work for you...

  http://spiralstormgames.com/blog/code-snippets/quick-Flash-extension-swap-multiple-element s-at-once.

  If you have a thousand things to change, you can review your design uses a dynamic approach, except the investment items must be managed manually defined specific locations.   In this way, you can simply change the link between the symbol and the programming will take care of the rest.

• Dev to create and test instances of the Summit on the same server and database

  I have a dev and instances of the Apex on different servers of prod. I want a test instance on the same server as the instance of dev.
  
  I use workspace import/export so all the workspaces instance have the same id of the workspace. The application ID is the same on each instance in the same workspace. This allows the pages to be exported or imported in the case of differenct.
  
  My question is (I'm sure it's obvious) I can have several instances of the Apex on the same database (dev and test) and have each the same instance ID workspace, etc..
  
  Sam

  .. often I have multiple instances of the Apex on the same database (dev and test) and I each instance have IDS of the same workspace...

  No, there can only be one Application Express instance in a database.

  Scott

• Several Instances ID using unique configuration files?

  I'm working on a project that has two instances of IDS that will essentially exactly the same thing, just triggered in different ways. Given that the two instances of IDS will do exactly the same thing, we thought to use a single file fsiuser/fsisys for both instances. For now, we have set them up separately, but the files are almost identical. My question is, is it a good idea to always have a link to 1:1 to an instance ID to a set of files in the MRL fsiuser/fsisys or is - it normal to have several instances of IDS point to one set of fsiuser/fsisys if the objective of the fsiuser/fsisys is the same thing?

  So, you have on server 1, ID - A, ID - B and ID - C. For clarity, we'll call these facilities. In the terminology of the IDS, an instance is a scalable subprocesses of the IDS. You can configure an installation of start ID IDS multiple instances, which all share the same configuration.

  It sounds like you're just make change transaction ID - B WIP and ID - C, and you mentioned that TEC was in a DB, so I guess that's a real database. If these assumptions are true, then you should be fine to share configurations... but I feel like ID - B and ID - C should be merged in one installation that generates multiple instances to handle the load of transactions. Is there a particular reason that it has been implemented in this way?

  -A

• Running several instances of Win7

  Hello, this is my first post in this forum.

  I tried to do some research to make sure that I'm not something that has already been answered, but that have not yet found.

  I would use vSphere Hypervisor (free product) on a single server and run several instances/images of Win7, so that I could use it in the classroom. My hope is that by doing this I need only to maintain an image and keep up-to-date.

  My plan is to create an image, and then allow clients to connect to the server via RDP and start a Win7 desktop computer using this image. I also need to have Office 2010 installed on this desktop is going to be where my teaching is centered.

  My questions are:

  1. This product will make?
  2. How to create the image of Win7?
  3. How licensing issues are handled so that I can legitimately run up to 5 copies of this Win7 desktop computer?
  4. Any other suggestions or thoughts that I have to consider?

  Thanks in advance.

  Russ Kauk

  If you are willing to accept a slight modification, it can do.

  (1) creating an image or

  (2) you create clones of n of this image and start them

  (3) users connect via IP/hostname to each individual workstation.

  If you need to automatically configured virtual machines and management, then you have to accelerate the non-free hypervisor, vCenter and VMware View.

  Regarding the issuance of permits - you will need licenses for Windows "n", likely.

• Using a single server for Multiple Instances of the APEX HTTP

  Our company DBA asked if it would be possible to outsource the server part of HTTP of APEX from DB servers. In other words, it would be highly preferable as DB servers * only * start the Oracle database software.

  We know that we can install the HTTP server on another box, but in thinking how to that, we were wondering if it's really necessary to create a separate HTTP Server installation for each instance of the APEX. What we would really like to do, is have a HTTP server for all our our boxes of Dev and several (but not one) for each of our superior environments; implementation stage, qa, prod, etc..

  Right now, each instance has a file single dads.conf on every box of DB. So, if we we to try to consolidate, we need some way to incorporate several dads files and associate each correct instance.

  Someone has already done this or (preferably) to have some examples?

  Thank you

  -Joe

  The second page on the link provided José begins immediately with the "Configuration of several databases".

  Yes, you can consolidate permanently. It is a common practice that was also available with Apache/mod_plsql, OSH and now with APEX earphone 2.

  Thank you

  Jorge

• OPA with several Instances of Siebel integration

  (1) I have a Siebel CRM Instance development
  (2) decisions for the Dev Instance Server
  (3) OPA installed and configured.
  Smoke test successfully tested.
  --------------
  
  Now we have an Instance of CRM Siebel Stadium
  and want to configure the same OPA/determinations server used for the Dev Instance with the scene.
  
  (1) is it possible?
  
  (2) it is possible, the siebel data - adapt .properties to a connection string for the Instance of Dev. Can this cause multiple entries to connect with the many Siebel Installation?

  You can have several points of Siebel environments for the same instances of Oracle Server of determination. This is controlled by the definition of Web Service from starting.
  However for the determinations of Web he uses a Siebel incoming web service call, the server is specified in the siebel-data - adapt .properties, while a single instance of determinations of Web can be integrated in a Siebel environment.
  It is possible to deploy multiple instances of determination of the Web on the same application server, just rename the WAR prior to deployment, for example Siebel-Web-determinations - Dev.WAR and Siebel-Web-determinations - Test.WAR. You can then each point of data-siebel - adapt .properties in respective environments. Note You must also change the symbolic in Siebel URL if you launch OWD of Siebel.

• Interrupted SQL statement and start several times with several SQL_EXEC_ID

  Hi all

  We meet a strange phenomenon, maybe someone can help.

  We see that sometimes, when our client runs a single statement, implemented Oracle to process the statement with a special SQL_EXEC_ID, but after a while stops and starts processing the statement along with different SQL_EXEC_ID. Then, after a while, it happens again - stop Oracle processes the statement and start from the beginning with the new SQL_EXEC_ID. This happens again and again until we kill all of the other sessions on the database (then it ends).

  What we see exactly: Client executes the statement (sql_id = "2tp7pz6yv87qp"). Monitor us v $ SQL_MONITOR and get this:

  SELECT Sql_id, sql_exec_id, to_char (SQL_EXEC_START, "HH24:MI:SS MON-DD-YYYY) SQL_EXEC_START, status OF V$ SQL_MONITOR where sql_id = '2tp7pz6yv87qp' ORDER BY SQL_EXEC_START DESC;

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777216 28 may 2015 07:19:14 the EXECUTION

  After a while check us again and see this:

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777217 28 may 2015 07:36:17 the EXECUTION

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777216 28 may 2015 07:19:14 FACT

  After a while, we see this:

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777219 28 may 2015 08:09:58 the EXECUTION

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777218 28 may 2015 07:53:37 FACT

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777217 28 may 2015 07:36:17 FACT

  2tp7pz6yv87qp 16777216 28 may 2015 07:19:14 FACT

  and so on — will happen again and again until we kill all of the other sessions in the database.

  When comparing the follow-up of the different SQL_EXEC_IDs SQL reports, we see that each of them did exactly the same job: used the same execution plan, beginning treatment she even read/wrote the same amount of e/s and each of them stopped at the same point during execution. You can see that for each SQL_EXEC_ID execution 'stops' in the middle and never reach the end of the plan. She always stops in the JOIN by HASH and never continue to the next steps in the implementation plan.

  When you look more deeply, we see in V$ ACTIVE_SESSION_HISTORY always last thing that happens for every SQL_EXEC_ID is HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER (SQL_PLAN_OPERATION = HASH and SQL_PLAN_OPTIONS = RIGHT OUTER JOIN). Then comes the new SQL_EXEC_ID and it starts to do the same thing as the previous SQL_EXEC_ID did when it was launched.

  Kill all other sessions, run finally ends. We see that the final (successful) SQL_EXEC_ID work and completes his plan to run to completion.

  When executing the same single statement (when it comes to the single session in the database), it ends with a single SQL_EXEC_ID. Its SQL monitoring report looks like the final execution when the phenomenon occurs after killing all other sessions.

  -We checked that the customer executing the query only once. AWR also only shows simple execution of the query.

  -We have reproduced in many different clients (plus SQL, JDBC thin client OIC and DBMS_SCHEDULER job).

  -It has no PARALLEL in the query or table.

  -In this case for different statements (different INSERT-SELECT and MERGE instructions).

  -Version: Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production

  Does anyone have an idea?

  Finally found the root cause of the problem.

  This phenomenon occurs when the cursor of the active query being invalidated. This can occur in several scenarios, in our case, what happens when we work on a single partition (read or write) and perform DDL operations on different partitions of the same or the tables.

  Steps to reproduce:

  1 launch long command DML that affect the single partition

  2. in the course of executing this SQL, do one of the following values in a session different all 1 minute:

  2.1 do the indexes to a different partition unusable: ALTER TABLE X EDIT PARTITION Y UNUSABLE LOCAL INDEX

  2.2 rebuild the unusable index of different partition: ALTER TABLE X EDIT PARTITION Y REBUILD UNUSABLE LOCAL INDEX

  2.3 a partition different truncate

  Support of Oracle we were told that this problem is known and there are several requests for bugs and improvements thereon, for example this one:

  Bug 12905327 : TRUNCATE to an INVALID PARTITION TABLE UNNECESSARILY IMMEDIATELY all THE SLIDERS

  In our case (ETL process), we used to perform all these operations DDL and DML operations long (we work on different partitions in parallel). In order to solve, we have separated these operations to the different phases in our process and don't be DDL and DML operations at the same time more. This solved the problem for us.

• single instance of the concurrent program

  How limiting it is only 1 instance of simultaneous application of a simultaneous to run at a time program already?
  
  for example, if the simultaneous program need exclusive access to a table, how can limit us only 1 instance of the simultaneous program is running?
  
  Currently, we are trying several bank statement loader (cash management module) and we suspect this program 2 charger fights for single temporary table: ce_stmt_int_tmp

  Do the incompatible competitor with itself

  Cannot make Incompatible concurrent programs with himself (Doc ID 436186.1)

  HTH
  Srini

• ImportREDServer.exe runs several Instances

  When I run the CS5 first it starts 8 instances of ImportREDServer.exe (see attached). Is this normal? Also, when I open my project (1200 + R3D clips), it loads a few hundred then hangs (not responding) for 30 to 60 seconds, then charge a few hundred more and so on. I don't know if they are related. However, when I open the version CS4 project in CS4, it loads a lot faster and smoother. Any thoughts?

  Data sheet:

  First 5.0.2

  Windows 7 64 bit

  6 GB OF RAM

  clocked at 1.6 GHz I7

  FireWire 800 6 TB LaCie connected through ExpressCard adapter

  

  Yes, it is normal that several instances of ImporterREDServer to start - up to one by heart of processor.

  You have a fairly small amount of RAM for a computer equipped with eight processors. If there are multiple instances of the RED importer running to load hundreds of clips RED, it will take some time, especially if these authorities are fighting for a small amount of RAM. Whenever the software fight more RAM, you experience delays, especially if the contents of the RAM, eventually exchanging hard disk.

  I have 24GO of RAM in my computer at home with the same number of processor cores you have. It's a big positive difference.