Static WAG320N road.

Hello everyone.

I am trying to create a static route in my WAG320N. Are two subnets I want connect/route

192.168.1.0/24 (wag320n IP: 192.168.1.1) and 192.168.2.0/24 (another IP of the router/gateway: 192.168.2.1)

.

I go to the advanced routing (@ my WAG320N) and I try to add a static route:

IP address of destination: 192.168.2.0

Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0

Gateway:192.168.1.1 (the address IP of WAG320N)

When I fill in the fields and press Save I get the message:is not a valid gateway address. Re-enter.

Any suggestions on what I am doing wrong?

PS. I have already setup a simple static route on the other router with the same model.

New: the WAG320N does not support this type of installation. It does not directly define the static routes sent nor the secondary IP addresses is what you wanted. You'd have to divide the two subnets and through another router to get this working... (unless the SAI netfaster 2 has two ports WAN/internet).

Generally, you do not run two IP subnets in the same local network segment, but rather put a router between subnets and route between them.

Tags: Linksys Products

Similar Questions

  • Question about ACL's with the 2621 when using site to site VPN

    I set up two site to site vpn. We have an ASA at our headquarters and branches will IOS routers - one is a 1811 and the other 2621. Both are running the latest versions of IOS, respectively. The two VPN site-to-site do not work. I have a list of inbound on the external interfaces of both routers, access that allows only the IP address of the ASA IP traffic. All other traffic is denied. I put NAT overload upward in the typical form, and I use ip outgoing inspection on the same interface, to allow incoming traffic back to surfing the internet. This configuration works very well with the 1811, where all traffic is blocked except traffic IP (IPSEC) coming from the ASA. Guests at our headquarters can reach hosts behind the 1811 and vice versa.

    Here's my problem: the 2621 is processing traffic encapsulated on the external interface and block this traffic because it does not match. I know because when I turn on logging / debugging on the 2621, I see inbound traffic blocked by the ACL. Technically, I guess that it does not, but to this interface, the traffic is always encapsulated so I think it fits to this access list and then go to the Cryptography decapsulation card and be sent to the destination host. Just as it does on the 1811. I have not 'wan' t to create another line in the access list for all subnets to Headquarters. Why is not it works the same way as it does on the 1811? Is there something else I need to activate?

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Config of 1811:

    !
    version 12.4
    horodateurs service debug datetime msec
    Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec
    encryption password service
    !
    hostname BranchVPN1
    !
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    !
    logging buffered 51200 notifications
    !
    AAA new-model
    !
    !
    AAA authentication login default local
    activate the default AAA authentication no
    authorization AAA console
    AAA authorization exec default local
    !
    AAA - the id of the joint session
    no ip source route
    IP cef
    !
    !
    IP inspect the audit trail
    inspect the IP dns-timeout 10
    inspect the name IP internet udp timeout 30
    inspect the name IP internet tcp timeout 30
    inspect the name IP internet ftp timeout 30
    inspect the name IP internet http timeout 30
    inspect the name firewall tcp IP
    inspect the name IP firewall udp
    inspect the name IP firewall icmp
    IP inspect the dns name of the firewall
    inspect the name IP firewall ftp
    inspect the name IP firewall http
    inspect the name IP firewall https
    inspect the IP firewall name ftps
    property intellectual auth-proxy max-nodata-& 3
    property intellectual admission max-nodata-& 3
    !
    !
    IP domain name xxxx
    !
    !
    !
    !
    username xxxxxxxxxx
    !
    !
    !
    class-map correspondence vpn_traffic
    police name of group-access game
    !
    !
    VPN policy-map
    class vpn_traffic
    in line-action police 2000000 37500 pass drop exceeds-action
    !
    !
    !
    crypto ISAKMP policy 10
    BA aes 256
    preshared authentication
    Group 2
    ISAKMP crypto key address xxxx xxxxxx
    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10
    !
    life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
    !
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac xxtransform
    !
    xxmap 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
    defined peer xxxx
    Set transform-set xxtransform
    PFS group2 Set
    match the address tunnelnetworks
    static inverse-road
    !
    !
    !
    interface Loopback0
    172.16.99.1 the IP 255.255.255.255
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/0
    Description Connection to Internet (DHCP)
    DHCP IP address
    IP access-group outside_in in
    no ip redirection
    no ip unreachable
    no ip proxy-arp
    inspect the firewall on IP
    NAT outside IP
    IP virtual-reassembly
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    No cdp enable
    xxmap card crypto
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/1
    Description of the connection to the local network
    address 172.20.1.1 IP 255.255.255.0
    no ip redirection
    no ip unreachable
    no ip proxy-arp
    IP nat inside
    IP virtual-reassembly
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    No cdp enable
    VPN service-policy input
    !
    interface Serial0/0/0
    no ip address
    Shutdown
    No cdp enable
    !
    interface Serial0/1/0
    no ip address
    Shutdown
    !
    IP forward-Protocol ND
    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dhcp
    !
    no ip address of the http server
    local IP http authentication
    no ip http secure server
    IP nat inside source list nat - acl interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
    !
    IP nat - acl extended access list
    refuse any 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 ip
    allow an ip
    outside_in extended IP access list
    allow udp any eq bootps host 255.255.255.255 eq bootpc
    allow an ip host (ASA IPADDR)
    deny ip any any newspaper
    IP extended access list police
    deny ip host xxxx any
    deny ip any host xxxx
    IP 172.20.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
    tunnelnetworks extended IP access list
    permit host 172.16.99.1 ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
    IP 172.20.1.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
    !
    recording of debug trap
    logging source-interface Loopback0
    exploitation forest xxxx
    access-list 160 note t is
    not run cdp
    !
    !
    control plan
    !
    Banner motd ^ CC

    Authorized technician!

    ^ C
    !
    Line con 0
    line to 0
    line vty 0 4
    exec-timeout 5 0
    Synchronous recording
    entry ssh transport
    line vty 5 15
    exec-timeout 5 0
    Synchronous recording
    entry ssh transport
    !
    Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
    end

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2621 Config:

    !
    version 12.3
    horodateurs service debug datetime msec
    Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec
    encryption password service
    !
    hostname BranchVPN2
    !
    boot-start-marker
    boot-end-marker
    !
    logging buffered 51200 notifications
    no console logging
    !
    AAA new-model
    !
    !
    AAA authentication login default local
    activate the default AAA authentication no
    authorization AAA console
    AAA authorization exec default local
    AAA - the id of the joint session
    IP subnet zero
    no ip source route
    IP cef
    !
    !
    IP domain name xxxx
    !
    IP inspect the audit trail
    inspect the IP dns-timeout 10
    inspect the name IP internet udp timeout 30
    inspect the name IP internet tcp timeout 30
    inspect the name IP internet ftp timeout 30
    inspect the name IP internet http timeout 30
    inspect the name firewall tcp IP
    inspect the name IP firewall udp
    inspect the name IP firewall icmp
    inspect the name IP firewall ftp
    inspect the name IP firewall http
    Max-events of po verification IP 100
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    username xxxxxxxxxxxx
    !
    !
    !
    class-map correspondence vpn_traffic
    police name of group-access game
    !
    !
    VPN policy-map
    class vpn_traffic
    in line-action police 2000000 37500 pass drop exceeds-action
    !
    !
    !
    crypto ISAKMP policy 10
    BA aes 256
    preshared authentication
    Group 2
    ISAKMP crypto key address xxxx xxxxx
    ISAKMP crypto keepalive 10
    !
    life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
    !
    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac xxtransform
    !
    xxmap 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
    defined peer xxxx
    Set transform-set xxtransform
    PFS group2 Set
    match the address tunnelnetworks
    reverse-road remote-peer
    !
    !
    !
    !
    interface Loopback0
    172.16.99.2 the IP 255.255.255.255
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/0
    Description Connection to Internet (DHCP)
    DHCP IP address
    IP access-group outside_in in
    no ip redirection
    no ip unreachable
    no ip proxy-arp
    NAT outside IP
    inspect the firewall on IP
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    No cdp enable
    xxmap card crypto
    !
    interface Serial0/0
    no ip address
    Shutdown
    No cdp enable
    !
    interface FastEthernet0/1
    Description of the connection to the local network
    IP 172.20.2.1 255.255.255.0
    no ip redirection
    no ip unreachable
    no ip proxy-arp
    IP nat inside
    automatic duplex
    automatic speed
    No cdp enable
    VPN service-policy input
    !
    interface Serial0/1
    no ip address
    Shutdown
    No cdp enable
    !
    IP nat inside source list nat - acl interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
    no ip address of the http server
    local IP http authentication
    no ip http secure server
    IP classless
    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dhcp
    !
    !
    !
    IP nat - acl extended access list
    refuse any 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 ip
    allow an ip
    outside_in extended IP access list
    allow udp any eq bootps host 255.255.255.255 eq bootpc
    allow an ip host (ASA IPADDR)
    deny ip any any newspaper
    IP extended access list police
    deny ip host xxxx any
    deny ip any host xxxx
    IP 172.20.2.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
    tunnelnetworks extended IP access list
    permit host 172.16.99.2 ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
    IP 172.20.2.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
    recording of debug trap
    logging source-interface Loopback0
    exploitation forest xxxx
    not run cdp
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    Banner motd ^ CCC

    Authorized technician!

    ^ C
    !
    Line con 0
    line to 0
    line vty 0 4
    exec-timeout 5 0
    Synchronous recording
    entry ssh transport
    line vty 5 15
    exec-timeout 5 0
    Synchronous recording
    entry ssh transport
    !
    !
    end

    Please check if this helps:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/12_3t/12_3t8/feature/guide/gt_crpks.html

    Federico.

  • Static NAT with the road map for excluding the VPN

    We have problems of access to certain IPs NATted static via a VPN.  After some research, we have learned that you have to exclude traffic destined for the VPN to the static NAT using a road map. So we did this:

    10.1.1.x is the VPN IP pool.

    access-list 130 refuse ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
    access-list 130 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

    sheep allowed 10 route map
    corresponds to the IP 130

    IP nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 1.1.1.1 sheep map route

    Above worked to fix the VPN but the IP 192.168.1.5 is no longer publicly available via 1.1.1.1.  What seems to happen, is that the static NAT is not really work and this IP address is NATted with the IP of PAT.

    Any ideas on how to get this to work?

    Thank you
    Diego

    Hello

    The following example details exactly your case:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml

    Try to replace the 192.168.1.0 subnet by the host address.

    It should work

    HTH

    Laurent.

  • Cisco SA540 - classic routing problem - 0.0.0.0 in static road

    Hello, I am a bit newbie with routing device,

    I had several public IP address

    I got a Cisco Pix 501and want to replace it with a Cisco SA540

    My Wan IP on Pix 501 is 195.68.x.z
    My Lan IP on Pix 501 is 62.23.a.b (and 62.23.a.c,...)

    My rules Pix 501 translation is: inside the interface. inside: everything: 0.0.0.0. Apart from the interface. same as orginal
    My Pix 501 static route: outside | IP address 0.0.0.0. Mask 0.0.0.0. Gateway IP 195.168.x.y | Metric 1

    So when a computer with 62.23.a.X want access to the internet the static route he say to throuw the 195.168.x.y of the IP Address of the gateway (as I undestand)

    I replicate this config on my SA540

    Also, through the Web user interface, I configure the Wan and Lan IP
    and then in the routing menu, I check "Classic routing" so I go to the static Menu to add the same route as in my Pix 501, but I can't put 0.0.0.0 in iP address or IP subnet mask.

    Can someone help me?

    Thank you very much.

    Hello

    I hope this finds you doing well.  Just thought I would add a few things here...

    You have probably seen this, but... Here is the link to the page SA500:

    https://www.myciscocommunity.com/docs/doc-10526

    Yes, when you configure the device as a router, you need to configure routing.  Try to remove the routes and the readd.

    In addition, a little off topic, but if you want to stay with an ASA5505, there used to be a tool that would turn your PIX configus ASA.  I don't remember where this link is now... but it used to fairly simple transition.

    After you have configured the routing, since your internal machine, have you tried a trace route?  On what device the traceroute fails?

    In case you wish to speak to a support representative, here is the link to find the correct number:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html

    HTH,

    Andrew Lee Lissitz

  • Removal of road static and led commands

    I can't seem to find it in the docs anywhere - how does one remove static, leads, and route commands on a Pix 515, v5.3? Can we simply type the word 'no', followed by the command?

    Thank you.

    Hello

    You can simply type "no" followed by the command. But you must be in config mode to do this.

    Kind regards

    Tom

  • static/digital waveform output and low frequency measurement of voltage - SMU-6358

    Hello

    1. I have an attached VI [digital_voltage_output] who must generate a logical true or false static state in the output of the device/port0/line1 Word to say. When the VI works I click the button several times, but nothing happens to the port0/lines1.

    2 such a thing [digital_voltage_waveform_output_square] if I'm trying to generate a digital waveform to pin the same with the waveform generating VI. If I connect a waveform chart to the output of the generator function VI, then the chart will show me the good waveform I want, but still nothing is written to the text file.

    3. I have read the manual for the X series cards, but it remains unclear for me a little how to things of the road in LV I have a measure of the frequency measurement VI low frequency that I downloaded. It offers me the ports for the supply frequency - ctr0, 1, 2, etc. As far as I'm concerned the PFI ports are responsible for these types of actions. How can I find out the LV that I want to connect say ctr0 and pfi0? »

    I use LV 8.6.

    Thank you

    Kriváň

    Hi Kriváň,

    The problem you had with the choice of a specific digital line as a physical channel, is that the control that was previously used in this example was created for a data acquisition task that uses a whole port rather than a specific line. I was able to overcome this problem by removing the control and recreate. The control now gives you the option to choose the specific digital lines e.g. port0/PXI1Slot2/$line0.

    I was also able to overcome the error of-200802 you mentioned. I was able to do this in a real constant of wiring at the entrance to auto-start the VI DAQmx writing then remove the DAQmx beginning the subsequent code VI. The modified code is attached.

    I hope this helps.

    Best regards

    Christian Hartshorne

    NIUK

  • WAG320N questions

    I'm in the United Kingdom.

    ISP is Orange @ up to 20 MB service

    -System information-
    Seller: Linksys
    ModelName: WAG320N
    Firmware Version: 1.00.08, 2009-08 - 27 T 19: 37:13
    Start the Version: 1.06
    Hardware Version: 0.01

    -DSL information-
    LAN Driver Version: The version annexed - A2pB023k.d21d
    DSL VPI/VCI: 0/38
    DSL Status: Showtime
    Mode of ADSL: ADSL2 +.
    DSL channel:
    Rate upstream DSL: 828 Kbps
    DSL downstream rate: 6142 Kbps

    Downwards upwards
    ADSL noise margin: 10.9 17.4 dB dB
    Attenuation of the DSL: 43.5 dB dB 22.7
    DSL transmission power: 19.5 dBm 12.3 dBm

    -Wireless information-
    Wireless Driver Version: 5.10.85.0.cpe4.402.4
    Wireless status: enabled
    Wireless Wide channel: 9
    Channel of wireless standard: 11 - 2,462 GHZ
    Wireless SSID: -.

    Systems:

    1 x XP pro 32 bit with all the installed updates and service packs.

    1 x Win 7 pro 64-bit with all updates installed.

    Both systems use integrated Realtek Gigabit NIC (latest drivers) wired with Cat 6

    Both use the same security software

    Problem: -.

    When the speed of ADSL, at snail PACE. I power off and power on the bridge. To decrease the speed of the line and until db SNR. (Worked a treat because Orange succeeded Wanadoo!)

    The bridge, to reconnect to the ADSL and work very well, if only 1 system is turned on.

    If both systems are on, gateway fails to reconnect and allow any browser see websites (Firefox, IE 8 32/64-bit and Minefield) or VPN or E-mail etc

    I disable, 1 system and turning off the front door, then power on and second gateway system after that. Then, it will allow normal access to the Net.

    I've had Network Magic installed, but is not installed where it was, it was not.

    I don't have this problem with a DGN2000, which is what the Linksys/Cisco WAG320N replaced.

    Apart from the definition of satic IP addresses for both systems, someone has ideas or know if there is a firmware that will solve the problem so far?

    TIA

    Del

    ADD ON: -.

    Just tried static IP addresses and there is no place in WAG320N to enable this?

    All resolved.

    WAG320N returned, as unfit for use.

    This is after talking to Tech Support via Live Chat, that said they would be esculate... nothing.

    Shame, Cisco/Linksys could not deliver even a beta version updated firmware, to at least try to solve the problem.

  • WAG320N Feature Request

    Hey guys.

    Hoping that someone from Linksys will read this here are my few cents on the WAG320N.

    Before I had this nice router-Modem-Combo I used a WRT54GS (with Thibor15c + a crappy TG585v7 from my provider). Honestly, I don't know really why Linksys invest in why and what people like [as in use] in custom firmwares. The WAG has pretty much the same defects that the WRT had [without custom firmware].

    (1) static DHCP (or a DHCP reservation)

    Set a static IP address via the operating system can be adapted to the servers or desktop computers. But what about the rest? Computers, laptops/Notebooks, Netbooks, smart phones - / Mobile and mid is likely to be used also in other networks. I don't want to - correction - no one wants to change the IP settings all the time [e.g. for Port-Forwarding work].

    (2) #- and Portrange-Port forwarding

    Funny that he called "Applications and games". Almost all the new games out there needs like 1 portranges single port and 2 passed [although outside connections should work out-of-the-box]. With a maximum of 10 beaches is a pretty tough call. It would also help single ports can be defined BOTH [not only UDP or TCP]

    This is a Community Forum. You must call the Linksys support and let them know your feature requests.

  • WAG320N and cable modem connection

    I have a small question,

    You could point me to some reference material on my WAG320N configuration to use my modem cable via Ethernet 1 port. I saw that he mentioned it's possible, but I have been unable to me sorting.

    And before ask you, I put the DSL router that I move in the next 12 months and my new base will not have access to cable internet and I'll be going back to DSL.

    Thanks in advance,

    Phil

    Actually in this case your bad, but thank you for the quick response.

    After a few game, it seems that the WAG320N is specifically configured to configure Ethernet Port 1 WAN port and you can route all internet traffic through the modem cable via the WAN port, you just set up.

    If anyone is interested, then load up your routers page 192.168.1.1 default config.

    Click Setup

    - Ethernet

    Next to Ethernet connection: select the button labeled radio like Port WAN

    Most of the stand-alone cable modems will have a static IP address both under the list of connection

                             down box  Select the static IP address.

    Enter the IP address of your cable modem, subnet mask, gateway and DNS address by default. (These items must have all be supplied by your ISP)

    And finally click on Save settings at the bottom of the screen to validate your changes.

    Then connect to your WAG via the Ethernet switch or wireless connection and you should be good for surfing the web.

    I hope this helps someone else who tries to use a modem cable through the WAG320N or similar device.

  • Help! Static route between two router WRT160NL

    Hi all

    I have my internet connection to connect to my main router from Linksys WRT160NL (192.168.1.1) with 192.168.1.x.

    My 2nd Linksys router to connect to the first gateway as well.
    The 2nd router has the ip 192.168.1.100 WAN and it's a local subnet as 192.168.2.x.

    My 192.168.2.x machines can access the internet and connect to all the machines in the network 192.168.1.x.

    However, the 1.x network cannot access the machines on the network of the 2. And because of that, I can't share or print between two networks.

    I try to add static routes on my main router (192.168.1.1) with the road: 192.168.2.0 mask 255.255.255.0 and default gateway 192.168.1.100

    However, the road does not work yet.

    in any case to ensure that the 1.x network able to access the network 2.x and 2.x access 1.x file and print sharing.

    Thanks for your help!

    Gateway of the router does NAT who made the side inaccessible side LAN WAN, unless you configure port forwarding automatic or similar. If she would not make your LAN 192.168.1 would be accessible from the internet. Static routing will not change that.

    You will need to disable NAT (aka switch to router mode) on the second router. You must configure a static route on the main router then. However, most likely your network 192.168.2 * will not have Internet more because the main router will NAT for 192.168.1. * and no 192.168.2. *.

    If possible set up the second router as access point only and run a LAN.

  • Remove the static route by default

    Hello

    I have a switch L3 which has a static default route pointing to a FW that is connected to a circuit of the Internet. The same L3 switch made EIGRP routers on our MPLS network. If this default static route disappears EIGRP will inject a default route, and users will receive their Internet traffic through the MPLS cloud as a backup.

    My question is how to remove this static road by default with a mechanism that is unique on the Internet circuit. I can't count on line protocol because it almost never goes down. I can't rely on Internet ping IP SLA addresses because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop of the SLA of intellectual property.

    I wish I could do BGP with the Internet provider but this circuit is in a country where it would be difficult.

    Any ideas on how to remove this default static route based on something that is unique to this tour of the Internet.

    Thank you

    P.

    "I can't rely on Internet addresses ping IP SLA because if they descended through the Internet channel available on the circuits quickly and create a loop IP SLA."

    To remedy this situation, you must add a route with the 'permanent' switch at the end of any IP you track on your IPSLA... In this way, if this interface is down, your ping IPSLA would stop and IPSLA would be the move and change your default route.

    Example:

    Route IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 2.2.2.2 Permanent

    where 1.1.1.1 is the IP address, you are followed and 2.2.2.2 is your 'usual' default gateway

  • Redistribution of static routes in OSPF

    Hi all

    It seems that the static routes can still live even if the designated interface went down.

    I added a description for this problem file.

    Stephen,

    I don't know why the distribution list did not work. Did you include the permit all at the end of the access list? Without it, you wouldn't get the external routes, as you journey.

    I have just re-read the documentation for the ip route, 12.2 and 12.4, ' cos I wasn't aware of the useful form of the command that Rick suggested. Here is an excerpt:

    Specifying a next digital jump which is on a directly connected interface will prevent the router to use Proxy ARP. However, if the next hop interface breaks down and the digital next hop can be reached by a recursive route, you can specify hop and the following interface (for example "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Ethernet1/2 10.1.2.3") with a static route to avoid the roads pass through an unintentional interface.

    Which describes your problem exactly, I think. He comes:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/SW/iosswrel/ps1835/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00800ca75a.html#wp1018065

    Therefore, the interface specification that force the static route to use only a local next hop.

    Kevin Dorrell

    Luxembourg

  • By default static route with recevied BGP default route

    Hi guys;

    I have a problem and I don't know how to find or solve it.

    My chart is attached, please check everything first.

    Secondly, I have a multihomed BGP with two Internet service providers, I received two ISPS via BGP default route.

    Now, I have two types of IP addresses as follows:

    1 - my own prifixes, who has recorded with my ACE

    2 - iPs purchased ISP2.

    I have two networks, the first will contain my own prefixes and second will contain my prifixes ISP2. so I have to go on the internet, static route by default to the ISP2 need and that's fine, now the problem that carry the second defect I received two ISPS in routing however my table if I show ip bgp I see that I received it, but because of favorite and distancing China he disappear the default road statistics.

    so now a network is already online and the second network that contain my own IPs is out of service, of course this second network I need to routed to my isps1 via bgp and when isps1 down, go through ISP2 and I do using weight and as path prefix.

    Thank you

    Hi Nathan,

    With ACB option, you config-route map is your own prefix and set its next hop ISP 1 and 2 PSI when ISP 1 IP is not accessible. Apply the road map to interface with Network1. ACB is processed before routing.

    With option VRF, put the Network1 interface and isps1 VRF1, so it will have separate routing table. Under the vrf1 you static default config with higher AD and the next hop pointing to ISP2 in the global routing table. This will be used when you lose by default isps1. Because separate ridges VRF table routing, so netwoek1 will use the default route in vrf1 to isps1 as primary, the Network2 use ISP2.

    HTH,
    Lei Tian

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

  • RV320 static subnet ISP

    Hi guys,.

    First of all, I'm a guy from Layer 7 and have only basic knowledge on networks. With this knowledge, I have problems to set up a RV320 (v1.1.1.19 (2014-12-01)) with a static IP subnet of my ISP. I have a 29 subnet with a FritzBox cable as a modem cable simple (no firewall works etc. on the FritzBox). I have an IP address configured for the interface WAN1 (90.xxx.xxx.206). The second is configured as DMZ. Now, I would like to pass the remaining public IP addresses with different ports to dedicated DMZ servers.

    To be more clear:

    Modem cable (90.xxx.xxx.201)

    WAN1 90.xxx.xxx.206 (subnet 90.xxx.xxx.200/29) GW: 90.xxx.xxx.201

    WAN2 / DMZ: 10.0.0.0/24 (different 8-port Switch)

    LAN1: 192.168.1.0/24 (different 24-port Switch)

    There is no connection / (other than the RV320) Road between LAN and DMZ (separate interfaces configured on the VMware host computers)

    I don't know if I have to configure the RV320 as gateway or router. The current settings are the entrance door. I have attached a small diagram to make things clearer (hopefully).

    Thanks in advance.

    Thomas

    Hello

    I created this document to set up something very similar to what you're asking here. I think that it will suit your needs very well.

    Please see the attached document and let me know if it was helpful to you.

  • VRF Installationavecuneracine road inaccessible NH

    Hello

    I just start dabling in the VRF to GNS3 so forgive me if this is a silly question. My understanding is that roads be installed in the SIDES if the next hop address is inaccessible. I announced a single route in the VRF (from BGP) and installed the road even if the VRF ignores the next hop.

    #show ip route vrf Border1 test

    Routing table: test
    Code: L - local, C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP
    D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone
    N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2
    E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2
    i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2
    -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user
    o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static, H - PNDH, l - LISP
    + - replicated road, % - next hop override

    Gateway of last resort is not set

    10.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1
    C 10.99.99.1 is directly connected, Loopback9
    B 200.1.1.0/24 [20: 20] via 10.35.1.1, 00:40:12, GigabitEthernet3/0

    #show ip route vrf Border1 test 10.35.1.1

    Routing table: test
    Subnet in the table %

    test definition VRF
    RD 100: 100
    !
    ipv4 address family
    import the unicast ipv4 IMPORT OF GLOBAL - map
    output-address-family

    interface Loopback9
    VRF forwarding test
    10.99.99.1 IP 255.255.255.255

    IP-list of prefixes LEAK VRF seq 5 permit 26 200.1.1.0/24

    IMPORT OF GLOBAL-enabled 10 route map
    address for correspondence prefix LEAK VRF ip-list

    I have a really basic VRF configuration and made no big thing with her. Any ideas on how the VRF can install this road when there isn't a road to the next hop?

    Hello cwhite0013,

    It is true that BGP should not install a route if it has an entry for the next break in the Routing Table.

    Looking at your configuration, I can see the router "flows" in the VRF 'test', the 200.1.1.0/24 road which is originally in the global Routing Table.

    In this case, the router must send traffic to a next break in the global Routing Table. This is the reason for which the router is looking for the jump next 10.35.1.1 not in the VRF 'test', but in the global Routing Table where there should be an entry for it.

    I hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for

  • the titles of music Apple iOS 10 & duplication of playlist

    HIw can you stop the application by downloading doubles & playlist? It is now drop my iPhone 6 s ability. I'd hate to have restore the phone when 7 is coming next week... URG so irritating. It seems that all these previous updates questions would NOT

  • Satellite L550D-136 - too small fonts in Java applets

    Hello guys,. I am a happy owner of L550D-136 and everything works except one thing: all the chat rooms (java-based) and also communicators are not readable (fonts seem to be too small). It seems that this problem is limited only for these two cases.

  • Replacement key?

    What are some ways simpler and less expensive to replace a specific key on a Lenovo T410? I recently bought a. Something is stuck under the left SHIFT key, and when I removed the key, a small knot on the hinge broke, making it unusable. I called four

  • Why debug.log appears several times on my desk?

    I know it can be difficult to understand since it is probably an application that is causing it to happen. But I have to understand it and stop it. Often, after my pc sat for awhile, I cancel the screensaver and a new file is on my desktop named debu

  • Bluetooth device driver is not installed

    I used the fix from microsoft to resolve the above message, but he could not help. He asked me to find a solution online.  Then, I got a message that windows found driver software for your device. He asked me to download a missing driver of Broadcam