Substitute a port of Dvs group strategy

For the life of me I can't understand this point, otherwise I'm just completely missing it in the UI (web client). I put a deposit on a group of ports for uplink "grouping" allowed. I have * taken * this meant that I could change my order of uplink for this group of ports on a host unique, different from all other hosts, because the substitution would allow me too.

Now, assuming that my thinking is correct, I have no idea where I can change the order of uplink on the specific host. Am I missing something? Thank you!

Unless I missed something, you cannot set a different configuration of grouping by host based since you are using vDS... substitution option that you authorized, means that you can have a different policy of consolidation of the vDS together, but not for a specific host.

If you use vSwitch Standard you can do another political collection for each Port Groud and host, but don't not using vDS.

Tags: VMware

Similar Questions

  • Setting Port with PowerCLI group permissions

    Hello

    I write a script that creates a pool of resources, add a security group to her permissions and creates then 2 groups of ports on each host in the data center, defines their VLANiD and then add a security group and port group permissions. I managed to go as far as to create the Port groups I can't get to add the security group for port group permissions. I managed to make it work with the resource pool.

    I was wondering if anyone knew how to add a security group AD for port using PowerClI group permissions?

    Thank you

    The New-VIPermission cmdlet does not support newer entities, such as the network.

    This means that you will have to fall back on SetEntityPermissionsSDK method.

    $esxName = 
    $pgName = 
    $user =                   # Ex "TEST\luc"
    $role =                         # Ex "Admin"
    $group = $false
    $propagate = $false
    
    $authMgr = Get-View (Get-View ServiceInstance).Content.authorizationManager
    $perm = New-Object VMware.Vim.Permission
    $perm.Principal = $user
    $perm.roleId = ($authMgr.RoleList | where{$_.Name -eq $role}).RoleId
    $perm.group = $group
    $perm.propagate = $propagate
    
    $esx = Get-VMHost -Name $esxName
    $esx.ExtensionData.Network | %{
         $net = Get-View $_
         if($net.Name -eq $pgName){
              $authMgr.SetEntityPermissions($_,$perm)
         }
    }
    

    ____________

    Blog: LucD notes

    Twitter: lucd22

  • Strategy of port security VM group?

    A VMWare health check is conducted by a consultant.  He wrote:

    The virtual Port Group computer security policy are the default and not changed value according to BP AND

    Storage Multipathing strategy is according to BP.

    We wonder what means BP means and how to change the security policy for the Port Group.  We would like to have some knowledge base before discussing with him.

    Your opinion is requested.

    Best practices. They are probably referring to the promiscuous mode, change MAC address and forged pass parameters on the vSS or vDS. Many counselors draw conclusions of VMware vSphere Security Hardening Guide. Google that and it should be the first shot. Our guide will explain each of these parameters.

  • Definition of VLAN ID on vmkernel ports on dVS - Nexus 1000

    I noticed when adding vmkernel ports to a host on the dVS I'm not presented with an option to enter a VLAN ID. Is it because the VLANS is defined at the level of the port on the Nexus Group? Is there a need for me to create these ports on a vSwitch first to set the VLAN and then migrate them to the dVS?

    Thank you

    JD

    The VLAN ID is controlled by the port-profile on the VSMs 1000v. You don't have to specify it.

  • AnyConnect tunnel-group automatic assignment without selecting any group-tunnel-group-list alias and user-group strategy.

    Objective is that the anyconnect user must select group-alias, so that when a user enters his username and password he must go to his political group and tunnel-group specific. as I removed this command in webvpn 'no tunnel-group-list don't enable '. This I can not connect (user does not authenticate).

    1 - my question is why his past does not?

    Solution:

    If I keep only a single tunnel-group by default and make several group policies and assign to each user with his specific group policy that it works. in user attribute means I have only question following the commands it works, but if I put "group-lock value test-tunnel" that it did not identify.

    Please explain why.

    WebVPN

    allow outside

    limit the cache-fs 50

    SVC disk0:/anyconnect-win-3.0.10055-k9.pkg 1 image

    enable SVC

    internal strategy of group test-gp

    attributes of the strategy of group test-gp

    VPN-tunnel-Protocol svc webvpn

    the address value test-pool pools

    username, password test test

    username test attributes

    VPN-tunnel-Protocol svc

    group-lock value test-tunnel

    Strategy Group-VPN-test-gp

    tunnel-group test-tunnel type remote access

    attributes global-tunnel-group test-tunnel

    Group Policy - by default-test-gp

    tunnel-group test-tunnel webvpn-attributes

    allow group-url https://192.168.168.2/test

    Yes, you have the right solution. You only need to create 1 group of tunnel and multiple group policy. Under the attribute of the user, you re then group policy of vpn that you want the user assigned too.

    You can also authenticate users against AD and configure ldap attribute map to map the user to a specific group policy automatically.

    Here is an example of configuration if you happen to have the AD and will authenticate against AD:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00808d1a7c.shtml

    Hope that helps.

  • Port of vSphere groups 5

    Simple question about port groups. If you use dynamic or static links? As a general rule, which is the best option? Is there a reason why you would choose one over the other?

    Static is usually the best option.

    See also: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1022312

    Kind regards

    Mario

  • The 'IETF-RADIUS-Idle-Timeout' value substitute "Vpn-session-timeout' of group policy?

    Hello community,

    I wish to have a dynamic substitution of "Vpn-session-timeout' of Group Policy (using"ldap attribute-map").

    Read the section "Support for RADIUS authorization attributes" of the SAA, it is not clear, but apparently attribute 'IETF-RADIUS-Session-Timeout' being Cisco attribute name of the ASA to "vpn-session-timeout '.

    Can anyone confirm?

    R, Alex

    Yes!

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_ser...

  • I want to set up a group strategy that requires an administrator password during installation

    At my work, I want to implement a group policy that makes it so users can do almost everything, but when they install a program they guests of identification of account/password admin.  What type of user should I do?  What settings for I must change so that they can almost nothing, but can I be invited to a facility?  If anyone has an explanation or tutorial that would be great.

    Hi Jon,

    Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community. I understand that you want configuration group policy in Windows 7.

    Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/w7itproinstall/threads

    Hope it will be useful. If you still have questions, please answer that and we will be happy

  • vSphere port replication group

    What type of failover policy is necessary for a port of dvs group used for replication of vSphere? (active / active)?  (active / standby?)

    I recommend always to use Active/active, unless there is a reason not to. For example, if you have two cards of VMkernel iSCSI on the same subnet and you must use the binding of ports.

  • How to map a dynamic access to a group policy strategy?

    Experts,

    I'm doing an SSL implementation and a part of the requirement is to have the authentication of users in LDAP, are mapped to a particular group policy. They need this mapping for a particular bookmark assigned to them, because they are strictly using the WEBVPN portal. I have several DAP is configured and I want to map the user that is matched for each DAP, to a particular group policy. I read you can use the LDAP attributes on the user account in AD, but I want to map the DAP "mortgage" in Group Policy "mortgage", as opposed to reading additional AD attributes of the user. Is this possible?

    DAP and group policy are two ways to implement access control on the remote access vpn client.

    DAP must take precedence over group strategy.

    When the responses from the LDAP server for authentication request with the LDAP group member attribute, you can map this attribute of joining a DAP folder or a group policy.

    If you want to map the LDAP group member attribute to group policy, you must set the attribute LDAP map. Please see the example below

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00808d1a7c.shtml

    If you want to map the attribute for LDAP group membership in politics of the DAP, you will find the guide in ASDM

    Edit-> Advanced-> Guide dynamic access policy.

    The below is copied from the guide above.

    Example of composition of group

    You can create a basic logical expression for the special criteria of belonging to an AD Group. Because users can belong to several groups, DAP analyzes the response from the LDAP server in separate fields in a table. You need an advanced feature to accomplish the following:

    • Compare the memberOf a string field (in which case the user belongs to a group).
    • Iterate over each field returned memberOf if the data returned is of type "table".

    The function that we have written and tested for this purpose is shown below. In this example, if a user is a member of a group, ending by "-stu" they correspond to the DAP.

    assert(function()
       local pattern = "-stu$"
       local attribute = aaa.ldap.memberOf
       if ((type(attribute) == "string") and
           (string.find(attribute, pattern) ~= nil)) then
           return true
       elseif (type(attribute) == "table") then
           local k, v
           for k, v in pairs(attribute) do
               if (string.find(v, pattern) ~= nil) then
                   return true
               end
           end
       end
       return false
    end)()
  • Remove the port from the channel-group

    I met a strange problem with port aggregation, where I decided to remove a port of a port channel and put it in another, but in my SNMP tool, it still belongs to the old channel of port and the new at the same time.

    Port channel was created using:

    (config) #interface gigabitEthernet 0/1/22

    (config-if) trunk mode #switchport

    (config-if) active in mode #channel-group 1

    Then passes through

    (config) #interface gigabitEthernet 0/1/22

    (config-if) #no active mode channel-group 1
    (config-if) active in mode #channel-group 2

    I have also that when I pull up some information on configuring etherchannel.

    #show interfaces gigabitEthernet 0/1/22 etherchannel

    Port status Up Mstr Assoc in Bndl

    Group of channels = 2 Mode = active = Gcchange-

    Port channel = GC Po2 = - port-channel Pseudo = Po2

    Port index = 0 load = 0 x 00 Protocol = LACP

    Flags: S - device sends slow LACPDUs F - device sends Rapids LACPDUs.

    A - unit is in Active mode.        P - peripheral is in passive mode.

    Local information:

    LACP Admin Oper Port Port port

    Port flags State priority key number

    Item in gi1/0/22 SFT bndl 32768 0 x 2 0 x 2 0 x 117 0x3D

    Partner information:

    LACP Admin Oper Port Port port

    Key priority indicators Dev ID Age port key number status

    Item in gi1/0/22 SFT 32768 0817.35e4.2c80 26 s 0x0 0 x 2 0 x 118 0x3D

    Age of the port in the current state: 164d: 21 h: 32 m: 44s

    This could be a problem with my (observium) snmp tool or are there additional measures to eliminate a port of a group of channels? Reboot of the switch?

    System image file is "flash: c2960s-universalk9 - mz.150 - 2.SE4.bin.

    Hello

    I would say that it is related to the snmp tool, once you remove the port of the chain earlier and added to the new, which will be to the one, it is impossible that an interface will be less than 2 different port channels.

    Also there is no need to restart the switch or something like that, you can use the following commands to verify that the interface is now part of the new channel group:

    Show etherchannel summary

    Show interface execution item in gi1/0/22

    With these commands, you will see that the interface belongs to the Group channel 2, and the order that you set above shows that the interface belongs to po2.

    Hope this helps

  • Rename groups of ports

    Hello

    In vCenter via web client, I added a vswitch to some host. I have added a group of ports for the new vswitch so that I have two groups of ports on each vswitch who manage some physical cards and renamed the old port 'VM Network' groups while it appears on the web with a unique name client network tab that hostname in it.

    I put the network card of virtual machines to the new port groups.

    The old "VM Network" "VM Network1" and the "VM Network2" still appear in the web client, Network tab, they have even machines in the old network, although I changed to they renamed network. So the machine appears twice, in the new one the old network. I can't get rid of the old network. When I try to migrate virtual machines from the old to the new network, the list is empty.

    vmnw.gif

    Also, when I try to clone a machine, I get a warning that the NIC of the virtual computer using a network ("the new network name") that are not accessible. It seems to me, the old network names are still in use. Is there a chance to fix this? I'm afraid to have performance problems.

    The virtual machine have Active snapshots, where shots were created so that virtual machines were still attached to the groups old port? In this case, the ports 'ghost' groups should disappear after deleting snapshots.

    André

  • Import of groups of ports in vDS using powershell and

    I have a VCenter 5.5 with a 5.5 vDS. I'm trying to import several groups of ports in the vDS using powershell. The script is below. I'm under problems in trying to put the "Teaming and Failover" option to 'Route based on a physical load' by default 'Route based on originating virtual port' for the Group of individual ports, I know that I can do from the client, but I would like if possible do it with a script. Someone point me in the right direction? Port groups to import very well with all the correct settings, that I put, but I can't seem to find how to set the load balancing policy.

    to connect-viserver 'myvcenter '.

    $vds = Get VDSwitch -name "my Switch VD"

    Import-Csv c:\temp\vdsportgroup.csv | % {New-VDPortgroup -VDSwitch $vds -Name $_. Name -VlanId $_. {VlanId -NumPorts $_.ports}







    Edit: Scratch that I wrote earlier, it was with the older VDS cmdlets. This should work:

    Get-VDPortgroup MyVdPg | Get-VDUplinkTeamingPolicy | Game-VDUplinkTeamingPolicy - LoadBalancingPolicy LoadBalanceLoadBased

    You can simply direct the Group of newly created port directly object to cmdlets like this:

    Import-Csv c:\temp\vdsportgroup.csv | % {New-VDPortgroup - VDSwitch $vds - name $_.} Name - VlanId $_. VlanId - NumPorts $_.ports | Get-VDUplinkTeamingPolicy | Game-VDUplinkTeamingPolicy - LoadBalancingPolicy LoadBalanceLoadBased}

  • Adding Port, Tags and IP groups varies - impact on the VMS?

    We need migration of virtual machines to a different environment due to necessary maintenance SAN.  A colleague in another Department has offered to temporarily move VMs to its environment.  Looking at its systems, we need to add a new group of port, add our range of IP addresses to the NICs and tag his current group of port, because it is without label.  I think that this should not affect its virtual machines that are running in production, but am not 100% sure, so I ask confirmation.  We appreciate his willingness to help and don't want to do anything that would affect its systems.  Thanks in advance for your replies.

    Ann8 wrote:

    If you are sure that we can create the necessary tagged group without problem and do not have to worry about its original port of marking group

    This will depend on a bit of the physical switch, but you can almost certain make the port physical switch carry VLANs marked (called a "trunk" on Cisco devices) and use one untagged VLAN per port, which will be his old trade, known as the vlan "native" of Cisco.

  • Change the port VM different vSwitch network group

    Hello!  I have four vSwitches (vSwitch0 - vSwitch3) connected to 8 vmnic.  Each vSwitch currently has two vmnic, 1000 full assets and the other waiting.  Unfortunately, we have 6 virtual machines that are running in a VM port on vSwitch0 group, which also has the Service Console and vmkernel.  I want to move the virtual machines in this group on an another vSwitch and port so that the service console/vmkernel can be isolated.

    My understanding is that I really need to do to move virtual machines to another vSwitch group and the port is to change the settings of the virtual machines and etiquette of network to another.  My question is this:

    What kind of effect will a change like this on a production VM?  There will be a brief interruption in connectivity, or that it will be more important?  Less?

    Trying to get a hold if I should make this change during a maintenance window or do it at night sometimes and you worry too much on this subject.  Thoughts, let me know.  Thank you!

    Forget any link vSwitch and VM, there is no such link. VM is always linked to portgroup and he doesn't care at all vSwitch.

    If you want "to an another vSwitch VM" then create new VM portgroup on another vSwitch and then connect all the virtual machines to the new portgroup. That's all.

    ---

    MCSA, MCTS, VCP, VMware vExpert 2009

    http://blog.vadmin.ru

Maybe you are looking for