Support of cluster consistency created how much cache?

Similar Questions

• RAM how much my MacBook Pro support?

  Hello fellow Mac users,.

  I want to upgrade my MacBook Pro, but I don't know how many RAM slots it has and how much and what kind of RAM it supports.

  Could someone get me noticed?

  Thanks in advance!

  MacBook Pro

  Model: MacBookPro 8.1

  Processor: Intel Core i5

  Processor speed: 2.4 GHz

  processor #: 1

  Total carrots #: 2

  (By heart) L2 cache: 256 KB

  L3 cache: 3 MB

  (Vivid RAM) memory: 4 GB

  Boot ROM version: MBP81.0047.B2C

  SMC-version (System): 1.68f99

  SerialNumber (System): C0 * V13

  Material-UUID: *.

  < personal information under the direction of the host >

  Here you can get detailed information about RAM on MacBook. MacBook Pro: how to remove or install memory - Apple Support

• Host SSD cache - how much required

  recently installed ESXi (free) to use domestic test/study. ESXi starts on the USB.

  I have 2 SSD for storage, a 1 to for VMS and a 64 GB for the cache host.

  How does the host cache requires? I ask because I would like to use a part of the disk cache host to a dir on it to store ISOs of the OS I want to install on the 1 TB drive and test.

  ESXi host does not host any-cache. The power of virtual machines. How many? Depends on how much you commit too host-RAM. If you do not commit too much RAM, you need not the host cache. And if you book all the vRAM to virtual machines, you do not have same virtual machine swap file (with vRAM booking 100% it will not be created).

  In the worst case (when commit you too much RAM, no work of sharing/compression/balooning and all virtual machines all use the vRAM you assigned to them) you may need to host-cache of size SSD:

  'summary_of_vRAM_assigned_to_all_VMs' - 'host_RAM_available_for_VMs '.

  But if your host-cache SSD is smaller, it will be used anyway. And when it is full, 'normal' permutation will be used (with VM paging files).

• How much time does it take for consistency detect node failure?

  Hello everyone
  
  We have an application that, among other things, using a call to NamedCache.invoke (object, InvocableMap.EntryProcessor)
  distribute work to agents hosted in about 80 JVMs, different with each probably manages a portion of the cache
  key range. In the present case, the cache is managed by a service with a backup-counter 0. EntryProcessor agents
  "on the other side" get an entry based on the key value and put it in the cache. Our questions:
  -If a JVM that hosts the service fails all of a sudden, how much time it take the coherence length to detect failure?
  -How long it take consistency to move the key range that manages a server failing to another JVM?
  -Are the requests sent through InvocableMap.invoke () be queued or retried when the key refers to a series of treaties
  by a failed server?
  
  It is feared that we can face visible to the user failures using a cache in a service with a backup-counter 0.
  
  Thanks for any help
  -Mike Murphy
  
  P. S.
  Sorry for the user1172219 user id tag - I understand that it will take an hour or two for a new handle to appear.

  Mike_M wrote:
  Hello everyone

  We have an application that, among other things, using a call to NamedCache.invoke (object, InvocableMap.EntryProcessor)
  distribute work to agents hosted in about 80 JVMs, different with each probably manages a portion of the cache
  key range. In the present case, the cache is managed by a service with a backup-counter 0. EntryProcessor agents
  "on the other side" get an entry based on the key value and put it in the cache. Our questions:

  -If a JVM that hosts the service fails all of a sudden, how much time it take the coherence length to detect failure?

  Depends on coherence version 3.6 running dead ping detection database too is really very fast (about 1 seconds, I think).
  detection of death based on ping earlier or not running is a bit slower, but still fast enough.

  -How long it take consistency to move the key range that manages a server failing to another JVM?

  If you have a backup-counter 0, you will lose all data in partitions in the abnormally missing node. That's why these partitions will bleed on their new owner, and this mission is quite fast. On the other hand, some other partitions must be rebalanced, which can take some time depending on the size of data.

  -Are the requests sent through InvocableMap.invoke () be queued or retried when the key refers to a series of treaties
  by a failed server?

  They can be retried, but since you have lost the partition, you can end up with incorrect data. I don't know what is really happening in this case.

  >

  It is feared that we can face visible to the user failures using a cache in a service with a backup-counter 0.

  It depends on what your application, if the content of the cache is missing.

  Best regards

  Robert

• How much RAM it groups tabs use (on average)? Should I beware of groups and how much I have create?

  I can go overboard in creating groups of tabs. I say this because now my system begins to act a bit lazy. I created 7 groups, two of which have 9 or 10 tabs. Should I shoot the number of groups I create (as well as the way in which several tab located within each group). In other words: how much RAM tab groups use. How can I calibrate or understand the trade off between these markers and the amount of RAM they are using?

  You can see the use of memory on the topic: memory page.

  You can open on: pages through the bar of addresses as you open a Web site.

• Satellite A30 151: how much support MHZ

  Hi everyone;
  I have a laptop Toshiba A30-151 that there is 2 x 256 RAM but I want to upgrade 1 GB or 2 GB but unfortunetly I didn't what MHZ support?
  Can someone tell me my computer support MHZ how much...?

  Hello

  Your subject make me a bit confused. Do you want to upgrade the processor or memory? As far as I know that you can upgrade the memory maximum. 2GB (2x1024Mo)
  In addition, you can use these memory modules:

  PC2700 256 MB (PA3311U - 1 M 25)
  PC2700 512 MB (PA3312U - 1 M 51)
  1024MO PC2700 (PA3313U-1M1G)
  PC2100 128 MB (PA3126U - 1 M 12)
  PC2100 256 MB (PA3127U - 1 M 25)
  PC2100 512 MB (PA3164U - 1 M 51)

  Good bye

• ENVY 15-ah155nr (touch): how much RAM is supported by my ENVY 15-ah155nr (touch)?

  Hello, I have a question on my laptop, I want to maximize their ram, I watch my Nooteboom document on the amount of ram can be upgraded, the document did not in this topic.

  As I've mentioned before, my questions are: how much ram support my Envy 15-ah155nr? and, which is the frequency of maximum speed of ram that are supported?

  Thanks in advance for your support.

  Hello

  The Handbook you will indicate all the:

  http://h10032.www1.HP.com/CTG/manual/c04686890.PDF

  Several manuals:

  http://support.HP.com/us-en/product/HP-envy-15-notebook-PC-series/8502646/model/8857413/manuals

  Kind regards.

• How much ram is e2180 supports

  How much ram is e2180 supports

  E2180 is an Intel processor and your question is irrelevant. You need to know the brand and model of the computer or the motherboard... :-)

• How much data transfer during the thin VMFS copy to NFS, which does not support thin?

  1. I copy using - VMFS volume thin for a 2003 hosted server NFS volume.  However, there is no indication that the destination in charge it is thin, and the size of the file becomes the size declared.  When I copy the NFS share that does not support thin volume VMFS does, the file becomes thin.

  a. when I copy volume VMFS volume NFS, the amount of data actually traverses the network?

  b. when I copy volume NFS volume VMFS, the amount of data actually traverses the network?

  2. I have two identical servers with the same 5.1 ESXi on them.  When I copy one of them, starts immediately to 0% and charges while the other starts immediately to 10% and progressive count.  I have never seen this on another server.  If anyone has seen anything like this before?

  Thank you!

  IT_Architect wrote:

  I know already that thin size and thick.

  If the sizes are well apart from each other, it would be easy to see how much is transferred.

• I just bought a Nikon D750... Just went to upload my images in Lightroom 5 and he said: it does not support RAW NEF files. What am I supposed to do? Should I switch to Lightroom 6? If so, how much is an upgrade?

  I just bought a Nikon D750... Tried to download my images in Lightroom 5 and he said: it does not support RAW NEF files. What am I supposed to do? Should I switch to Lightroom 6? If so, how much is an upgrade? Help :)

  No fees. All the updates to version 5 are free of charge for owners of version 5.

  In Lightroom, click Help > updates

• How much does it cost to get help on paid support?

  How much does it cost to get help on Adobe paid a pension?  How to get to it?

  by mike m.

  1 (800) 833-6687

  Available from Monday to Friday between 06:00-19:00 (PST)

  $39.99 by prepaid call.

• Really, how much space is used on my Macintosh HD partition?

  Hello

  Here is what I get when I want to know how much of my Macintosh HD partition is used:

  

  Why disk utility say that GB 218,6 is used, but 695 GB for apps + 7.05 GB for photos + 16,07 GB of the 12.37 GB for video music = 730,62 GB is used?

  How come there is such a difference in the used section is calculated?

  I intend to create a second partition to do a dual boot, but what is the maximum size allowed for my second partition? Disk utility seems to allow 999.03 - 218, 6 = 780.43 GB, but we must rather 999.03 - 730.62 = 268,41 GB?

  Thanks for the replies

  Re-index the entire volume. Reading Spotlight: how to re - index folders or volumes - Apple Support.

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• Director of the laboratory: how much is

  Hi guys,.

  I already have standard vSphere. If I want to buy Lab Manager, how much it costs?

  It is just like in this page:

  http://store.vmware.com/servlet/ControllerServlet?Action=DisplayPage & Env = BASE & local = en_US & SiteID = vmware & id = ProductDetailsPage & productID = 138127300 & resid = MlHJ5QoHAj0AACYDVxYAAAAN & 1250821197140 = rests

  Support for VMware vCenter Lab Manager 4.0 for 1 processor + Platinum (24 x 7) 3 years

  $2 448,70

  Y at - it no limitation as the amount of the virtual machine, we can create, or the amount of the host, we can use with Lab Manager?

  Thanks in advance.

  For the portion of the price, the best if you call the seller serve you on VMware (partner or VMware).

  1 Lab Manager license can only be used in 1 (physical CPU, not the carrots) take of the ESX host. So, if your ESX 4 CPU (say 4 CPUS, total 16 cores), need you 4 license of LM.

  The license does not limit the number of VM.

  Concerning

  E1

• How much would it cost to repair iphone screen 6 in India?

  Hi everyone, in fact my 6 Iphone screen does not work correctly if I want to change the screen so I want to know how much it would cost me if want to replace the screen on the apple store.

  Check the Apple.com website in your country. The United States is support.apple.com that lists the repair costs.

  In the United States, it is $129 plus tax (without AppleCare +) or $29 (with AppleCare +). More than likely the price will vary in your country.

  Here is a link to the India English website: https://support.apple.com/en-in/iphone/repair/service