SX20 security risks

Similar Questions

• is there a popup saying updating security risk of 39.0.3? 06/08/2015

  popup security risk. is it valid?

  No, it isn't a valid Firefox update.

• Shockwave flash 16.0.0.235 installed, there is a security risk, cannot update

  There is an obsolete page on the Adobe Flash website blocked by Firefox 35.0.1 under Windows 7. Version 16.0.0.235 of Flash is labeled a security risk, "Always enable" is grayed out. I was on the Plugins page, and there I clicked on the update now linktext. I have been informed that all the old versions of Flash in the range of version 11 are blocked. Anywhere where go to from there. (My screenshot has a piece off the coast the Plugins page over top of the resulting page when I clicked the links provided).

  Obsolete page being blocked has been received and I was able to run through the download process, but in the end, I got an error.
  I tried several times to download install_flashplayer16x32_mssd_aaa_aih.exe, that downloads OK, and when I run it it downloads and installs Adobe Flash, then said: finishing and "There was a mistake."

  Flash software Glary Utilities Update update Internet Explorer, says nothing about Firefox, now I know why. It is a mess.

  I opened firefox Pei and went into the new profile Virgin I had created sometimes back. He was happily running a fully compatible version of Flash 11 (I bet that wouldn't last long because my browser's biting me in the end and disables it).

  Firefox Pei and I created a new profile today. It has this crippled version 16.0.0.235 Flash.

  It seems that Mozilla has an obsolete page telling me that all the old versions in the range of version 11 are blocked. No word on the newer versions.

  From what I've read, others are in what concerns other browsers and come with a bad Flash, too. I don't have Firefox (well, Internet Exploder, which I cut like a piece of trash since they came out with IE 7).

  Any advice? Thank you.

  This is over my head. I called the big players to help you.

• On the OWN website of mozilla, I get the message "Your Firefox is out of date and may contain a security risk!' but I just download and install the latest version?

  I have the latest version of firefox to date (15/10/2014 v32) and I still get messages while on various sites Internet (Youtube, Google, Gmail), telling me that your Firefox is out of date and may contain a security risk.

  I have not even this message on the support pages of mozilla.org?

  I tried the subject: config reset the useragent (s) fix, but it does not work.
  I tried browsing in safe mode and still get the error.

  Why this false/positive happening?

  Thank you

  Hello your useragent (information, the browser sends to websites to identify its version) - apparently by mistake - shows this:

  Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20140923 Firefox/4.0.0; xs-A30GTmfXR3o;CkHZPf;
  

  probably some kind of unwanted software has crashed it. Please refer to this article in order to reset the user agent settings in firefox:
  Sites Internet says that Firefox is obsolete or incompatible, even if it's the latest version

  in case this is not enough, please try to reset the whole browser:
  Firefox - modules to reset and refresh settings

• This page has a potential unspecified security risk.

  Hello

  I watched this program on several sites and I saw the same solutions related, but none have worked for me, so I thought I'd go to the source.

  Here's the question: I have a link in my taskbar in my My Documents folder, that, when I try to open it, I'm presented with this message:

  This page has a potential unspecified security risk.  Do you want to continue?

  If I select Yes, there is no problem, and my My Documents folder opens.  However, it's a nuisance, and I would like to stop this message from popping up every time.

  Regarding my setup:

  I am running XP SP2 (w / no intention to install SP3) on my desktop system I try to access my My Documents folder.  I also have a file server, that I call the USC, under Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS and sheltering a RAID 5 array and using Samba.  I have this table mapped to my desktop as Y: System.  The path to my My Documents folder is Y:\backups\my_docs.  Before a few days ago, I never had no problem with this.

  I am trying to add another array of RAID 5 to this file server, and I had some problems w / Samba.  At one point, I removed this mapping, while I was testing various configurations.  When I tried to re - map, I had connection problems.  Apparently, some of the changes I made now forced me to connect to that share without providing credentials.  So, just to be clear, before that, I got this mapped drive, then set it to reconnect to the opening, and there is no problem.  If, for some reason, I never had to re - map, all I had to do was provide my credentials and it matched with or without a problem.  Now, when I map, it requires no credentials, and it is simply the share.

  However, after everything that's happened, when I now, select the shortcut to my My Documents folder link, I get this notification.  I tried to delete and recreate the shortened link, but that did not help.  As I already mentioned, I had read several other sites, and I tried a few solutions, most of them of adding this share to the list of sites in my Local Intranet options w / in IE8.  I even tried under Trusted Sites.  Nothing has solved the problem.  It was also recommended that I have untick automatically detect it Intranet network, which I did, but to no avail.

  Currently, my installation of IE8 is as follows:

  Local intranet is set to medium-low security (I tried low, but it does not, either).  Is checked automatically detect Intranet network, and file://usc is added to the zone.

  Trusted sites is set to medium security, and I have no entries in its area.

  W this question, any help would be greatly appreciated.  Thank you very much.

  Jeff

  http://www.howtogeek.com/HOWTO/Windows-Vista/disable-the-annoying-this-page-has-an-unspecified-potential-security-risk-when-using-files-on-a-network-share/

  Hello, if you are always looking for an answer, it worked for me.

  I do not have it on the task bar, I got the error msg whenever I went to local parameters under administrator. So far I have not received the msg again.

• tried to download uniblue and came up to the top with a security risk warning is a problem?

  Uniblue is valid?  I tried to download the express chip set and I got a notice that it is a security risk because the digital signature could not be read or was not one at all, I contacted the company two times and did not get a response. They claim to be a microsoft partner. Can someone give me more information.

  Uninstall the software Uniblue programs & features list.

  Go to the website of the manufacturer of your computer, then it check the updates of suitable driver for your model.

  That's all you need to do, apart from ensuring that your Windows updates options are correct (the default is automatically download and update the important updates only)

• When I connect to Hotmail I get a message saying "this page is access to information that is not under its control. It is a security risk. »

  original title: new Info box in hotmail:

  Recently when I sign in to hotmail messages I get a box that says: this page is for access information that are not under its control, it is a security risk. -What this means and what I can do to get rid of him?

  Hello

  I'm sorry, but we cannot help with hotmail problems in these forums in response to vista

  Please repost your question in hotmail in the hotmail link below forums

  http://windowslivehelp.com/product.aspx?ProductID=1

  Forums

  E-mail client and the appliance issues

  Hotmail Sign In questions

  Lost or deleted emails

  People and Contacts

  Reading, writing, and formatting mail

  Sending and receiving mail

  Sign in, and sign to the top and account security

  Using the Hotmail calendar

  Using Web Messenger

   

   

  Consult with Microsoft Certified Solutions

  How to work the views Active Hotmail?

  Your account has been temporarily blocked

  What to do if you can't connect to Windows Live Hotmail

  Compromised account - unauthorized account access

  Reset your Windows Live ID password

  Error when you try to send an e-mail: your message seems to have triggered our spam filters.

  Change your Windows Live ID password

• Windows Sidebar v's Desktop Gadgets, security risk?

  The site of Microsoft for Windows Sidebar, I looked the other day, warned that Sidebar was officially abandoned due to security risks potentially serious. What I was looking for is actually on my W7 ultimate OS under programs and Windows Desktop Gadgets. Can I assume that this new version provide Gadgets is now fully secure?

  Windows Task Manager the fact already and don't use not vital resources all by, unlike the sidebar gadgets and junk like Norton Utilities.

  These gadgets and utilities actually contributed to the lack of memory and CPU when you most need and as such were and still are a complete waste of time and resources.

  Learn to live without them and have a better computing experience thus... :-)

• There is a security risk to plug the internet router management on the LAN port?

  I have to install an ASR1001 on the internet for my business.  I noticed that the ASR1001 has a dedicated management port and I was wondering if it's a security risk to have this mangment port directly connected to my local network, so that I can mange it from my office.

  I want to only run the ASR of this port and I will no management through its public IP address.  Is it possible for a malicious user to compromise the router then have access to the network but this management port?

  I'd say it's a reasonable risk.  If you intend not to allow future management of the public side sessions you are a good start, implementation of protection against attacks.  Combine that with a few basic hardening, for example to disable source routing, directed broadcast, ip proxy arp, finger, as well as an ACL on the management interface so that all traffic from an untrusted interface on the router would be unable to receive return traffic.  In addition, the management vlan must be a dedicated vlan.  I would not fall in the same vlan in that your office is located.  Better design would be to fall into a dmz (acl on the router's management interface would be redundant in this case) and to apply the rules of the firewall.  However, if this is not possible, order access to routing on the ASR as well by including only a 32 road to your management station via the management VLAN interface.  Also, remove any redisribution or advertising of this management interface in your routing protocol.

• What are the security risks to open port 80 on workstations?

  Hi all

  in our environment, there is an application that opens port 80 on workstations when it is installed, but it is not allowed on preimeter FW

  could you please tell what are the security risks for leaving port 80, opened on the workstations? or it is considered to be safe unless it is not allowed on the preimeter FW?

  Thank you & best regards

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

• What are the security risks by allowing a program to change the registry keys in Windows 7, without knowing what are the changes?

  Original title: security risks by allowing a program to change the registry keys in Windows 7, without knowing what are the changes?

  What are the security risks by allowing a program to change the registry keys in Windows 7, without knowing what are the changes?

  Hello

  If you had made any changes in the registry without taking the backup copy of the registry, then there could be chances that your computer can find themselves in no situation to start and finally end up in the reinstallation of the operating system; This is why it is recommended to take a backup changed in the register of representation.

  Before editing a registry key or subkey, we recommend that you export, or make a backup copy of the key or the subkey. You can save the backup copy to a location that you specify, for example, a folder on your hard drive or a removable storage device. If you make changes that you want to cancel, you can import the backup copy.

  . Are what program you referring?

  Warning: Important This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:

   

  Back up the registry:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/back-up-the-registry

  Let us know the status of the issue. If you need help, please after return. We will be happy to help you.

• What is the potential security risk to give 'any analysis' to a role or a user of 11.2.0.3 base data?

  What is the potential security risk to give 'any analysis' to a role or a user of 11.2.0.3 base data?

  Thank you

  Larry

  What is the potential security risk to give 'any analysis' to a role or a user of 11.2.0.3 base data?

  This is a HUGE security risk.

  Any person who uses the ANALYZE statement may accidentally or INTENTIONALLY, destroy the overall system performance.

  Just look at what the ANALYZE statement can do:

  https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e41084/statements_4005.htm

  Goal

  Use the ANALYZE instruction to collect statistics, for example, to:

  • Collect or delete statistics on an index or index partition, table or table partition, table held in index, cluster, or scalar object attribute.

  The ANALYZE statement has been deprecated for statistics for the DBMS_STATS package.

  But what happens if the real and accurate data use by your important questions have been removed or replaced with nonsense, invalid statistical totall?

  You could bring your system to its knees INSTANTLY. The system could start making full of HUGE tables table scans instead of using an appropriate index.

  TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE thing to do to grant this privilege unless absolutely necessary.

• Technical help with theme Adobe Muse - security risk?

  Hello

  I used a template/theme of Muse - themes.com get started on a website for a client and, yesterday, my free host email web client telling him that "in an analysis systematic server, we found the files that present a possible security risk, and these files must be removed immediately or this could result in a suspension of web service to complete elimination. We have placed the list of files in "blah blah blah" directory on your server. "Then, it almost seems like they threw a sales pitch for a piece of security software should I use to delete (with supplement of course). I found the file they were placed with a list of the compromise/malicious files and looked through them and I was wondering why these files were malicious and also what they would mean if I removed them, or how I could solve this problem in general. I copied and pasted from the list below... Thanks for your help in advance! EDIT: Looking at the files, it almost seems like these files are former designers wordpress web. Am I way off? Will it affect anything if I remove them?

  /htdocs/chrysolite-depicts/index.php: SiteLock-PHP-SHELL-md5 - koo.UNOFFICIAL FOUND

  /htdocs/WP-admin/admin_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/_mixins_new.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/Sunrise/colors_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/ectoplasm/colors.min_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/light/colors_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/Ocean/colors_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-admin/images/wpspin_light_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  / htdocs/wp-admin/includes/class-wp-ms-users-list-table_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-admin/maint/repair_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-admin/user/menu_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/plugins/index_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/plugins/search-everything/screenshot-2_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/plugins/search-everything/lang/se-ru_RU_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/plugins/search-everything/static/1de61352_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/plugins/search-everything/static/IMG/AJAX-loader_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/plugins/SlidePress/Flash/readme_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/plugins/SlidePress/TPL/ssp_setup_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/plugins/CIMY-header-image-rotator/cimy_header_image_rotator_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/plugins/CIMY-header-image-rotator/IMG/error_new.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  / htdocs/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/images/donate_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/classic/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/default/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/starkers/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/starkers/style/images/2264b047_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentytwelve/functions_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentytwelve/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentytwelve/Inc/custom-header_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentythirteen/header_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentythirteen/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentythirteen/js/theme-customizer_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentythirteen/images/headers/diamond_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyfourteen/header_noversion.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyfourteen/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyeleven/category_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyeleven/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyeleven/images/comment-arrow-dark_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyten/loop_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyten/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/images/WLW/WP-watermark_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/fullscreen/editor_plugin_src_new.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/paste/editor_plugin_noversion.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/spellchecker/classes/PSpell_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/wpgallery/editor_plugin_noversion.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/media/CSS/media_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/media/js/media_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/themes/88eda19a_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/themes/advanced/skins/o2k7/content_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  /htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/themes/advanced/skins/wp_theme/dialog_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL

  FWIW, none of these files are either produced or uploaded by Muse. They resemble files that would be part of a WordPress installation. Note the prefix "wp" on the issues concerned.

  Most likely the two files were already there when you bought your accommodation, they have been downloaded by you or someone using your account outside the Muse (using an FTP program), who was trying to install WordPress, or someone else has your username and password and using your account without your knowledge server.

• ? With RoboHelp 8 security risk?

  Message received from our House, IT supports the Department about a security risk associated with RoboHelp 8 this morning. Their caveat said: "there is a critical vulnerability inin the current version of RoboHelp.  This vulnerability could lead to an unauthenticated user download and execution of arbitrary code. " I contacted Adobe Support, and they were unable to provide details. Then I am connected to a bug report on the technical support page. My company request now that I uninstall Robohelp.

  Does anyone know about this security risk? Any ideas on how to fix?

  Thank you for the information you can provide.

  There is now an update of safety for the 8 HR server. Click here for more details.

• Should I v.27.0 & v.27.0.1 on my computer? Security risk?

  On my 64-bit Windows 7 Desktop, on the page to remove programs, I have two versions of FireFox, 27.0 and 27.0.1. They all have two (United States x86en) after their name. The 27.0.1 version is a more recent week, of course. Have the old version there as well a risk of security, such as older versions of Java, or is it harmless? Also, is there a 64-bit version of the browser should I use? The current 32-bit version seems to work very well. Thanks for your help

  It is very unlikely that you have Firefox 27.0 and 27.0.1 actually installed on your system.

  Usually, the installer for the latest version cleans up the section of the Windows registry that "Uninstall a program" uses to generate this list. However, sometimes the cleanup fails.

  I hope someone expert on how to clean it manually will post a suggestion for this so that you can get rid of the useless extra entry.

  For versions 32-bit/64-bit Firefox, no 64-bit version of Firefox was released. There is a version of 'nightly' 64-bit for developers, but because it has not yet entered stable, I do not recommend to use it.