? With RoboHelp 8 security risk?
Message received from our House, IT supports the Department about a security risk associated with RoboHelp 8 this morning. Their caveat said: "there is a critical vulnerability inin the current version of RoboHelp. This vulnerability could lead to an unauthenticated user download and execution of arbitrary code. " I contacted Adobe Support, and they were unable to provide details. Then I am connected to a bug report on the technical support page. My company request now that I uninstall Robohelp.
Does anyone know about this security risk? Any ideas on how to fix?
Thank you for the information you can provide.
There is now an update of safety for the 8 HR server. Click here for more details.
Tags: Adobe
Similar Questions
-
Technical help with theme Adobe Muse - security risk?
Hello
I used a template/theme of Muse - themes.com get started on a website for a client and, yesterday, my free host email web client telling him that "in an analysis systematic server, we found the files that present a possible security risk, and these files must be removed immediately or this could result in a suspension of web service to complete elimination. We have placed the list of files in "blah blah blah" directory on your server. "Then, it almost seems like they threw a sales pitch for a piece of security software should I use to delete (with supplement of course). I found the file they were placed with a list of the compromise/malicious files and looked through them and I was wondering why these files were malicious and also what they would mean if I removed them, or how I could solve this problem in general. I copied and pasted from the list below... Thanks for your help in advance! EDIT: Looking at the files, it almost seems like these files are former designers wordpress web. Am I way off? Will it affect anything if I remove them?
/htdocs/chrysolite-depicts/index.php: SiteLock-PHP-SHELL-md5 - koo.UNOFFICIAL FOUND
/htdocs/WP-admin/admin_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/_mixins_new.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/Sunrise/colors_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/ectoplasm/colors.min_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/light/colors_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-admin/CSS/colors/Ocean/colors_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-admin/images/wpspin_light_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/ htdocs/wp-admin/includes/class-wp-ms-users-list-table_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-admin/maint/repair_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-admin/user/menu_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 23.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/plugins/index_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/plugins/search-everything/screenshot-2_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/plugins/search-everything/lang/se-ru_RU_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/plugins/search-everything/static/1de61352_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/plugins/search-everything/static/IMG/AJAX-loader_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/plugins/SlidePress/Flash/readme_indesit.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/plugins/SlidePress/TPL/ssp_setup_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/plugins/CIMY-header-image-rotator/cimy_header_image_rotator_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/plugins/CIMY-header-image-rotator/IMG/error_new.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/ htdocs/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/images/donate_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/classic/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/default/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/starkers/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/starkers/style/images/2264b047_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentytwelve/functions_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentytwelve/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentytwelve/Inc/custom-header_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentythirteen/header_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentythirteen/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentythirteen/js/theme-customizer_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentythirteen/images/headers/diamond_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyfourteen/header_noversion.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyfourteen/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyeleven/category_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyeleven/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyeleven/images/comment-arrow-dark_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyten/loop_ver1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 26.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-content/themes/twentyten/functions.php: SiteLock-PHP-INJECTOR-1 - and FOUND .UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/images/WLW/WP-watermark_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/fullscreen/editor_plugin_src_new.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/paste/editor_plugin_noversion.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/spellchecker/classes/PSpell_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/wpgallery/editor_plugin_noversion.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/media/CSS/media_infoold.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/plugins/media/js/media_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/themes/88eda19a_backup.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/themes/advanced/skins/o2k7/content_prevv1.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
/htdocs/WP-includes/js/TinyMCE/themes/advanced/skins/wp_theme/dialog_bck_old.php: JCDEF. Obfus.CreateFunc.BackDoorEval - FOUND 21.UNOFFICIAL
FWIW, none of these files are either produced or uploaded by Muse. They resemble files that would be part of a WordPress installation. Note the prefix "wp" on the issues concerned.
Most likely the two files were already there when you bought your accommodation, they have been downloaded by you or someone using your account outside the Muse (using an FTP program), who was trying to install WordPress, or someone else has your username and password and using your account without your knowledge server.
-
tried to download uniblue and came up to the top with a security risk warning is a problem?
Uniblue is valid? I tried to download the express chip set and I got a notice that it is a security risk because the digital signature could not be read or was not one at all, I contacted the company two times and did not get a response. They claim to be a microsoft partner. Can someone give me more information.
Uninstall the software Uniblue programs & features list.
Go to the website of the manufacturer of your computer, then it check the updates of suitable driver for your model.
That's all you need to do, apart from ensuring that your Windows updates options are correct (the default is automatically download and update the important updates only)
-
Shockwave flash 16.0.0.235 installed, there is a security risk, cannot update
There is an obsolete page on the Adobe Flash website blocked by Firefox 35.0.1 under Windows 7. Version 16.0.0.235 of Flash is labeled a security risk, "Always enable" is grayed out. I was on the Plugins page, and there I clicked on the update now linktext. I have been informed that all the old versions of Flash in the range of version 11 are blocked. Anywhere where go to from there. (My screenshot has a piece off the coast the Plugins page over top of the resulting page when I clicked the links provided).
Obsolete page being blocked has been received and I was able to run through the download process, but in the end, I got an error.
I tried several times to download install_flashplayer16x32_mssd_aaa_aih.exe, that downloads OK, and when I run it it downloads and installs Adobe Flash, then said: finishing and "There was a mistake."Flash software Glary Utilities Update update Internet Explorer, says nothing about Firefox, now I know why. It is a mess.
I opened firefox Pei and went into the new profile Virgin I had created sometimes back. He was happily running a fully compatible version of Flash 11 (I bet that wouldn't last long because my browser's biting me in the end and disables it).
Firefox Pei and I created a new profile today. It has this crippled version 16.0.0.235 Flash.
It seems that Mozilla has an obsolete page telling me that all the old versions in the range of version 11 are blocked. No word on the newer versions.
From what I've read, others are in what concerns other browsers and come with a bad Flash, too. I don't have Firefox (well, Internet Exploder, which I cut like a piece of trash since they came out with IE 7).
Any advice? Thank you.
This is over my head. I called the big players to help you.
-
This page has a potential unspecified security risk.
Hello
I watched this program on several sites and I saw the same solutions related, but none have worked for me, so I thought I'd go to the source.
Here's the question: I have a link in my taskbar in my My Documents folder, that, when I try to open it, I'm presented with this message:
This page has a potential unspecified security risk. Do you want to continue?
If I select Yes, there is no problem, and my My Documents folder opens. However, it's a nuisance, and I would like to stop this message from popping up every time.
Regarding my setup:
I am running XP SP2 (w / no intention to install SP3) on my desktop system I try to access my My Documents folder. I also have a file server, that I call the USC, under Ubuntu 8.04.4 LTS and sheltering a RAID 5 array and using Samba. I have this table mapped to my desktop as Y: System. The path to my My Documents folder is Y:\backups\my_docs. Before a few days ago, I never had no problem with this.
I am trying to add another array of RAID 5 to this file server, and I had some problems w / Samba. At one point, I removed this mapping, while I was testing various configurations. When I tried to re - map, I had connection problems. Apparently, some of the changes I made now forced me to connect to that share without providing credentials. So, just to be clear, before that, I got this mapped drive, then set it to reconnect to the opening, and there is no problem. If, for some reason, I never had to re - map, all I had to do was provide my credentials and it matched with or without a problem. Now, when I map, it requires no credentials, and it is simply the share.
However, after everything that's happened, when I now, select the shortcut to my My Documents folder link, I get this notification. I tried to delete and recreate the shortened link, but that did not help. As I already mentioned, I had read several other sites, and I tried a few solutions, most of them of adding this share to the list of sites in my Local Intranet options w / in IE8. I even tried under Trusted Sites. Nothing has solved the problem. It was also recommended that I have untick automatically detect it Intranet network, which I did, but to no avail.
Currently, my installation of IE8 is as follows:
Local intranet is set to medium-low security (I tried low, but it does not, either). Is checked automatically detect Intranet network, and file://usc is added to the zone.
Trusted sites is set to medium security, and I have no entries in its area.
W this question, any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much.
Jeff
Hello, if you are always looking for an answer, it worked for me.
I do not have it on the task bar, I got the error msg whenever I went to local parameters under administrator. So far I have not received the msg again.
-
original title: new Info box in hotmail:
Recently when I sign in to hotmail messages I get a box that says: this page is for access information that are not under its control, it is a security risk. -What this means and what I can do to get rid of him?
Hello
I'm sorry, but we cannot help with hotmail problems in these forums in response to vista
Please repost your question in hotmail in the hotmail link below forums
http://windowslivehelp.com/product.aspx?ProductID=1
ForumsConsult with Microsoft Certified Solutions -
There is a security risk to plug the internet router management on the LAN port?
I have to install an ASR1001 on the internet for my business. I noticed that the ASR1001 has a dedicated management port and I was wondering if it's a security risk to have this mangment port directly connected to my local network, so that I can mange it from my office.
I want to only run the ASR of this port and I will no management through its public IP address. Is it possible for a malicious user to compromise the router then have access to the network but this management port?
I'd say it's a reasonable risk. If you intend not to allow future management of the public side sessions you are a good start, implementation of protection against attacks. Combine that with a few basic hardening, for example to disable source routing, directed broadcast, ip proxy arp, finger, as well as an ACL on the management interface so that all traffic from an untrusted interface on the router would be unable to receive return traffic. In addition, the management vlan must be a dedicated vlan. I would not fall in the same vlan in that your office is located. Better design would be to fall into a dmz (acl on the router's management interface would be redundant in this case) and to apply the rules of the firewall. However, if this is not possible, order access to routing on the ASR as well by including only a 32 road to your management station via the management VLAN interface. Also, remove any redisribution or advertising of this management interface in your routing protocol.
-
Original title: security risks by allowing a program to change the registry keys in Windows 7, without knowing what are the changes?
What are the security risks by allowing a program to change the registry keys in Windows 7, without knowing what are the changes?
Hello
If you had made any changes in the registry without taking the backup copy of the registry, then there could be chances that your computer can find themselves in no situation to start and finally end up in the reinstallation of the operating system; This is why it is recommended to take a backup changed in the register of representation.
Before editing a registry key or subkey, we recommend that you export, or make a backup copy of the key or the subkey. You can save the backup copy to a location that you specify, for example, a folder on your hard drive or a removable storage device. If you make changes that you want to cancel, you can import the backup copy.
. Are what program you referring?
Warning: Important This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
Back up the registry:
http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/back-up-the-registry
Let us know the status of the issue. If you need help, please after return. We will be happy to help you.
-
What is the potential security risk to give 'any analysis' to a role or a user of 11.2.0.3 base data?
Thank you
Larry
What is the potential security risk to give 'any analysis' to a role or a user of 11.2.0.3 base data?
This is a HUGE security risk.
Any person who uses the ANALYZE statement may accidentally or INTENTIONALLY, destroy the overall system performance.
Just look at what the ANALYZE statement can do:
https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E11882_01/server.112/e41084/statements_4005.htm
Goal
Use the
ANALYZEinstruction to collect statistics, for example, to:- Collect or delete statistics on an index or index partition, table or table partition, table held in index, cluster, or scalar object attribute.
The ANALYZE statement has been deprecated for statistics for the DBMS_STATS package.
But what happens if the real and accurate data use by your important questions have been removed or replaced with nonsense, invalid statistical totall?
You could bring your system to its knees INSTANTLY. The system could start making full of HUGE tables table scans instead of using an appropriate index.
TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE thing to do to grant this privilege unless absolutely necessary.
-
is there a popup saying updating security risk of 39.0.3? 06/08/2015
popup security risk. is it valid?
No, it isn't a valid Firefox update.
-
I have the latest version of firefox to date (15/10/2014 v32) and I still get messages while on various sites Internet (Youtube, Google, Gmail), telling me that your Firefox is out of date and may contain a security risk.
I have not even this message on the support pages of mozilla.org?
I tried the subject: config reset the useragent (s) fix, but it does not work.
I tried browsing in safe mode and still get the error.Why this false/positive happening?
Thank you
Hello your useragent (information, the browser sends to websites to identify its version) - apparently by mistake - shows this:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20140923 Firefox/4.0.0; xs-A30GTmfXR3o;CkHZPf;
probably some kind of unwanted software has crashed it. Please refer to this article in order to reset the user agent settings in firefox:
Sites Internet says that Firefox is obsolete or incompatible, even if it's the latest versionin case this is not enough, please try to reset the whole browser:
Firefox - modules to reset and refresh settings -
With explanations wireless security options
Hello team,
I would like to have your base of knowledge up-to-date with the types of security options available in IEEE and security options supported on the NETGEAR router with detailed description. The current article which is available on your KB Portal is bad enough. That's what I get when retrieved from the security options...
http://KB.NETGEAR.com/app/answers/detail/A_ID/112/
and
http://KB.NETGEAR.com/app/answers/detail/A_ID/13205
I would like to refine your article with all the security options available from WEP, WPA - PSK [TKIP], mixed, WPA2-PSK [AES] etc. I'm not sure if your knowledge base team consider my request or not. Even if they think it will I get any deducted after the publication of my article in your support portal.
Thank you best regards &,.
NetRags
@NetRags I'm going to go ahead and pass on to management.
Thank you!
-
"Windows services Centre" call by saying that I have a problem with my internal security system
Hello
I received a phone call from 'Windows Service Centre', James Henderson, employee of 406-235-1159, phone number #7098 (Yes, that's an indication 406 and 416 - which is one of the reasons why I'm suspicious), but gave a speech in Mississauga (Ontario), saying that I have a problem with my internal security system and even if www.ammyy.com I need to talk to the technician to solve this problem. I do not trust him and hang up, but called the number, responded to the same person (as he had an Indian accent with a lisp in addition to this) and he said that Joseph and not James!
Scam or what? Thank youIt is a scam! Who is becoming extremely common and was even on the news in some places. As long as you don't give them any personal information, you should be fine. Should they call once again, simply hang up.
See the recent thread below for more information; Shenan Stanley and the spirit of the messages contain very useful information:
The call tech support?
http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/Forum/windows_xp-system/tech-support-calling/3a07ee4a-cb7c-4F6E-bfa2-5f7067346859The links below contain excellent information regarding this and other scams:
Avoid scams to phone for tech support
http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/avoid-phone-scams.aspxAvoid scams that use the Microsoft name fraudulently
http://www.Microsoft.com/security/online-privacy/msName.aspxThe site ammyy.com offer legitimate a service to help users to connect remotely to other computers; the crooks simply operate these services. This is the first time I have heard of this site, seems most of the fraudsters a different use.
Kind regards
-
problems with the XP security 2011 removal
I went and downloaded the XP security 2011 thing on my laptop and everything was smooth until our days. For some strange reason, I was unable to get on my internet explore still under Mozilla Firefox. More when I went to try to go to control panel to try to remove it, I couldn't even in any of the things in the control panel. Whenever I try to click on any of my icons (if its on my desktop or in another folder, or basically ANYTHING) it will essentially say this:
"Windows cannot access the specified device, path or file. May not permissions to access you the item.
I tried to go through safe mode and restoring a system on it, BUT it won't let me do that either. I went back as far as last month and it will restore not again at this point and I know it has to do with this XP security 2011.
Is someone please help me with this problem because I don't have the money to take that laptop to the store for repair?
Thank you!
Hello
This malware has many names and XP security 2011 is one of them.
XP Antispyware 2011, Vista Security 2011 and Win 7 Internet Security 2011 rogue change name are
fake antivirus, a scam to you force to pay for them while they have no advantage at all.Uninstall XP Antispyware 2011 and the security of Vista 2011, Win 7 Internet Security 2011 (uninstall Guide)<-- read="" this="">
http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/virus-removal/remove-win-7-Internet-Security-2011It can be made repeatedly in Mode safe - F8 tap that you start, however, you must also run
the regular windows when you can.Download malwarebytes and scan with it, run MRT and add Prevx to be sure that he is gone. (If Rootkits run UnHackMe)
Download - SAVE - go to where you put it-right on - click RUN AS ADMIN
Malwarebytes - free
http://www.Malwarebytes.org/Run the malware removal tool from Microsoft
Start - type in the search box-> find MRT top - right on - click RUN AS ADMIN.
You should get this tool and its updates via Windows updates - if necessary, you can download it here.
Download - SAVE - go to where you put it-right on - click RUN AS ADMIN
(Then run MRT as shown above.)Microsoft Malicious - 32-bit removal tool
http://www.Microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=AD724AE0-E72D-4F54-9AB3-75B8EB148356&displaylang=enMicrosoft Malicious removal tool - 64 bit
http://www.Microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=585D2BDE-367F-495e-94E7-6349F4EFFC74&displaylang=enalso install Prevx to be sure that it is all gone.
Download - SAVE - go to where you put it-right on - click RUN AS ADMIN
Prevx - Home - free - small, fast, exceptional CLOUD protection, working with other security programs. It comes
a scan only, VERY EFFICIENT, if it finds something to come back here or use Google to see how to remove.
http://www.prevx.com/ <-->
http://info.prevx.com/downloadcsi.asp <-->Choice of PCmag editor - Prevx-
http://www.PCMag.com/Article2/0, 2817,2346862,00.aspTry the demo version of Hitman Pro:
Hitman Pro is a second scanner reviews, designed to save your computer from malicious software (viruses, Trojans,
Rootkits, etc.) that has infected your computer despite all the security measures that you have taken (such as
the anti-virus software, firewall, etc.).
http://www.SurfRight.nl/en/hitmanpro--------------------------------------------------------
If necessary here are some free online scanners to help the
http://www.eset.com/onlinescan/
-----------------------------------
Original version is now replaced by the Microsoft Safety Scanner
http://OneCare.live.com/site/en-us/default.htmMicrosoft safety scanner
http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx----------------------------------
http://www.Kaspersky.com/virusscanner
Other tests free online
http://www.Google.com/search?hl=en&source=HP&q=antivirus+free+online+scan&AQ=f&OQ=&AQI=G1--------------------------------------------------------
Also do to the General corruption of cleaning and repair/replace damaged/missing system files.
Run DiskCleanup - start - all programs - Accessories - System Tools - Disk Cleanup
RUN - type in the box-
sfc/scannow
Then run checkdisk (chkdsk).
RUN - type in the box-
Chkdsk /f /r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
If we find Rootkits use this thread and other suggestions. (Run UnHackMe)
I hope this helps.
-
I have problems installing with kaspersky internet security, 2015 on windows 7
Original title:
internet security Kaspersky 2015
iI problems of installation with kaspersky internet security, 2015 on windows 7 will not install it comes up with a message to reinstall net framework from microsoft which I did & the question was not resolved.i however installed on my other pc that runs vista without issues.has - what someone has encountered this and if so is there a resolution? Thank you
Make sure that you install the .NET Framework 4.5 for Windows 7, not 4.0.
Also try to stay connected to the Internet during installation:
http://support.Kaspersky.com/11045#Block1
You can also do a clean boot.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Apple Watch series 1 (38mm) - battery drain in airplane mode
Hello I've had my Apple Watch series 1 (38mm), on Friday. So far, I really like and love what I can do with it. Never thought I would do so many things with it :-) However, I've lived a strange behavior... To save battery, I turned today into airplan
-
Pages - trying to link the issue to the paragraph of the answer
Hi there: neophyte user Pages for businesses trying to link the issue of the survey to a paragraph "answering machine". As an example... Question: What's your brown grass? Yes No If the answer is Yes, then want to fill and print a paragraph explain
-
When to use Google for search results display if small I can't read them. This just started today.
Today, when I was looking for with Google. The display of the results began becomes smaller and small, just before my eyes and I couldn't stop and I doing me nothing, but the playback screen. I can't find anything to tell me how to recover the displa
-
my hp phtotsmart d110 series is no longer able to scan to PDF from the front panel.
my hp phtotsmart d110 series is no longer able to scan to PDF from the front panel. How can I solve this problem?
-
I'm running XP SP3 home page. Recently, I get an automatic Windows Update message that a 2007 SP2 update is ready for download and installation. Is that what sounds good since I installed SP3?Thanks for your comments.Andy