TextField properties - differences in anti-aliasing

Similar Questions

• Which past now and not days ago = > publication of text captions with anti-aliasing off the coast looking for really bad.

  I reported the bellows of text and I'd like to know if it happens to someone else.

  Concise problem statement:

  When you publish buttons with text or text with antialiasing off the coast, the result is very bad.

  Last project I cancelled 2 months ago and it seems good. But when I did a few changes yesterday and I published it again all the buttons and links that they looked very bad.

  I tried with different computers, where they have installed captivate and I have reproduced the bug how I show below and in any place of same problem.

  I can't show the client the changes because the evil look textfields.

  I tried to reinstall all the options, Captivate and install older versions of flash and nothing plugin, everything looks the same. Probably a windows update may cause the problem, I don't know.

  
  Steps to reproduce the bug:
  1. black background or dark color
  2. create the button and select Properties
  3. Select the text color color yellow or clear, size of large font (24-30) and transparent background
  4 publish

  Results: no text no embattled arround White halo, eat as the text. The part of the text is a bit fuzzy.

  Resemble the translucent color part of the text to produce somehow anti-aliasing is white in color.
  
  Expected results: the net image as html on browser text.

  Hi again

  Well, it give a try.

  Minimize all applications that you can see the desktop.

  Right click on the desktop, then select Properties.

  Click the appearance tab.

  Click on the effects button.

  You see an option called use the following method to smooth edges of screen fonts?

  If so, disable the option and click OK.

  Report back if you still have this option and, if so, if you erase it helps.

  See you soon... Rick

  Useful and practical links Captivate wish form/Bug report form Certified Adobe Captivate training SorcerStone blog Captivate eBooks

• Example of signals with a filter anti-aliasing

  I use PCI-6259 6221 PCI and USB 6221 cards in different configurations. As I understand it, is that the anti-aliasing filter on all of these cards is fixed to pass to the frequencies of 1 MHz. If I'm a signal from a RG58U BNC cable that is supposed to contain higher frequency of 1 kHz sampling, but there is noise of high frequency present there. A sampling of the signal to 2 kHz would be enough to acquire the signal correctly, or these high frequencies would affect the components of low frequency on sampling?

  I read about too much sampling that allows you to use digital filters (I'm guessing that software filter can be used) If you sample the data at a higher rate. You should always use the anti-aliasing filter, but the required parameters are more relaxed. Would this work in my case? The anti-aliasing filter on my cards has a very high bandwidth, so I don't know how much I need to do to acquire the signal correctly oversampling. Is there an equation?

  Also, if the analog inputs for data acquisition cards are generated by a filter (for example when recording ECG or EEG) which allows you to specify a bandwidth frequency, I still need a filter anti-aliasing? Would be the distance between the amplifier and the DAQ card much a difference when it comes to the generation of noise on the cable?

  In general, I try just to see if my current collection method at the rate of Nyquish with the maps I have is good or not. I just save the data without even using any digital filtering (software).

  That's right - if you go down to 10kS/s then the temporal resolution and minimum pulse detection would 100us.  If it is a just sampling rate or not depends on your requirements for the accuracy of timing and jitter.  In other words, if it's OK that your pulse Detection could could delay until 100us then a 10kS/s sampling frequency should be OK.

• Anti-Aliasing feature in graph does not always, but inexplicably...

  I noticed a strange bug of Aliasing in the graphical indicator in my labview 2014

  I have attached a file that has two supposedly identical graphics but on my PC (windows 7, i-3 dual core, 8 GB Ram) charts two different display modes.

  The one labeled "aliasing problem" is jagged when anti-aliasing is turned on and when is broken. The other table behaves as I expect and I'm used to.

  (1) - does anyone see this difference as I do?

  (2) can someone explain the reason for this phenomenon?

  much obliged for any comment

  Thank you

  I see the same thing:

  

  There seems to be a bug specifically with the graph of scan (with the line). Power off the line, updates work fine. Also, turning aliasing seems then redraw the map with the correct folding (you can see that at Midway through the data on the first plot). You could try periodically calling the method "Force redraw' to see if that makes aliasing to update. It seems also set when you stop the VI.

  Weird bug since it is only on one of the graphics.

  (Also... What is with all the local variables and signalling of the value? (And the weird to leave timeout?)

• Is there a way to remove anti-aliasing on objects in PS?

  Without going into too much boring detail, I'm working on the art files created by other people. There are often dozens of smart objects (vector) that have been placed with active anti-aliasing, resulting in the rounded edges, that everyone loves so much. Fuzzy or crisp edges have no impact on the quality of the final product, but I can't get the artists to stop using it. The problem is that I need to make accurate selections of art as quickly as possible. Ideally with the magic wand. Is there a way to remove this effect, is looks like it would be simple enough to have a checkbox in the Properties window.

  If you're going in Edition > turn free, uncheck the box anti-aliasing, what is working?

  Do no real transformation, simply uncheck anti-aliasing and then validate

• Reduce the sizes of the images - not anti-aliasing

  Hi guys,.

  I had a search around and not found much to this particular (it is also a difficult thing to get) so I hope that perhaps someone here could enlighten us.

  I am relatively new to using Flash but well-versed in other adobe software.

  I have this problem:

  I am a symbol of interpolation so that it reduces in size. It was a PNG. He's going to be great for the little ones. When it is small, it becomes less anti-aliasing (claire double-edged, more visible and directly proportional to how much he has been reduced)

  It's something unrelated to real interpolation - it has just become evident in this situation. It also happens when resizing just using the tools of transformation.

  Here are a few screenshots:

  

  Thoughts?

  Sam

  Right-click on the image in the library and choose the properties option.  In the interface that opens, select the option to allow smoothing.

  You could also just try using Flash vector graphics for special instead of an imported image.

• Illustrator for the Export PNG - without Anti-Aliasing/Bi-cubic interpolation

  There is something missing when you export PNG images in illustrator (file > export) so when the images that have been resized in illustrator get exported, get no not a subsampling anti alising/correct treatment.

  It is a scaling in illlustrator to 88% of the images. The first Image is a PNG export , while the second image is saved through Save for Web... the difference between the qualities of anti-aliasing is obvious:

  

  

  It is important to note that export a JPEG file and choosing 'Art optimized' in the anti aliasing tab gives deirable results but such an option does not exist when exporting png.

  

  ERMM...

  

  You sure?

• Anti-aliasing legends Transparent

  Does anyone know why Captivate 4 will be anti-aliasing some transparent legends and not others? Captivate publish these inconsistent legends for no apparent reason. Is there a solution for this?

  Hello

  Unfortunately I can't tell exactly * WHY * he does what he does, but if you have any bullets applied the legend is not anti-aliasing. That's probably the difference.

  See you soon... Rick

  Useful and practical links Captivate wish form/Bug report form Certified Adobe Captivate training SorcerStone blog Captivate eBooks

• Weird * stretching * text anti-aliased in the Textbox

  I use Flash 8 (actually with CS3 but all recording mode Flash 8 and use AS2.) I'm also kind of new to the present).
  I have a button that loads a dynamic text in a text box using this actionscript:
  
  on (release) {}
  loadText = new LoadVars();
  loadText.load ("sometext.txt");
  loadText.onLoad = {function (success)}
  If (success) {}
  trace (Success);
  _root. TextBox.outsideFilename.htmlText = this.externaltext;
  }
  };
  }
  
  Loads of everything very well - EXCEPT when I choose "Anti-alias for readability" (and use a non-standard font and integrate some character sets) all the text in the text box out elongated vertically - it comes out looking stretched for some reason any. Is this a normal behavior? Looks terrible and not what I want. If I don't choose to be the choice of "Smoothing", while proportions are correct them all, but not anti-aliasees of course. What I'm missing here? I would like to think proportionally correct anti-aliasing of text.

  If you size your textbox (Note: change the width and height in the Panel properties scales your textbox, unfortunately) then the text content will be stretched.

  However, scalability text works on embedded characters. This is why the scale appears only when you choose to incorporate characters. To resolve this problem:

  (1) remove any scaling of the text box. To do this, select your text and use the panel(Window > Transform) transformation to set the width and height to 100%

  (2) resize your textbox using arrow tool or the type tool.

• Why Firefox is made of fonts while stairs and blocks, w/no anti-aliasing?

  FF 29.01 under Windows 7. You can see the image below the link to compare how browsers should make the fonts and how my browser actually renders the police. It is not a question of magnification. I have already installed the Anti-Aliasing Tuner extension. I added the layout.paint_rects_separately boolean as well.

  http://i.imgur.com/6kdcFok.PNG

  Seems to me that ClearType is disabled.
  http://www.thewindowsclub.com/disable-font-smoothing-Windows

  This only applies to Firefox? If yes you switch to another font in Firefox settings?

• Filter low pass analog (anti-aliasing filter) external to the NI USB 6251 housing

  Hello everyone!

  -I m trying to acquire an analog signal of tension (high frequency content) using a connected to an edge NI USB-6251 BNC-2110. I learned in this Labview Forum that NI USB-6251 has no analog low-pass filter programmable (or anti-aliasing filter), so that I can't help but jitter when scanning my signals. For my application, the cutoff frequency of the analog low-pass filter must be equal to 100 kHz or MORE (maximum of 500 kHz). A possible solution to solve my problem, would be to work with an external analog low-pass filter before you scan the voltage signal. Based on this I'd like to know:

  (1) national Instruments develops analog external filters? I need a filter which also has one output, analog, so that I could send also the low-pass analog filter filtered signal to my NI USB-6251 box to scan correctly it!

  (2) what model of external low pass filter would be compatible with the NI USB-6251 housing?

  Any help would be much appreciated!

  Best regards!

  Hello

  all high resolution of the M series (628 x) cards are equipped with a filter low pass which can be enabled or disabled programmatically. For the anti-aliasing filter feature, examine the boards of National Instruments DSA (dynamic signals Acquisition) acoustic and vibration measurement
  currently the NOR 9221, 9225, 9227, 9229, 9233, 9234, 9235, 9236, 9239 and 9237 C Series modules feature anti-aliasing filters. These modules are intended for the high accuracy measures for which anti-aliasing filters are a necessity.

  Houssam Kassri

  OR Germany

• cRIO thanks the Module NI 9237 bridge in the Interface of scanning and Anti-Aliasing

  Hello

  I have questions about the use of a Module NI 9237 bridge with CRIO and its use in Scan Interface mode. The manual speaks the data rate of the module, and a (n) parameter that can be set to adjust (to a minimum of 1613 Hz) which in turn puts across the module built in anti-aliasing filters. It seems (but not explicitly stated) that this data rate setting is available FPGA programming mode.

  Our application is currently running in mode Scan Interface, so my question is what is 'throughput' module (and therefore anti-aliasing filters) mode Scan Interface? And, if we have the analysis period the value 10msec (100 Hz), y at - it no filtering of the anti-aliasiing of software provided automatically by scanning interface itself related to the period of scanning? Or all the anti-aliasing extra something that we must build within ourselves? I looked at the example provided with Scan Interface and there is nothing more.

  I don't understand about anti-aliasing, just need to clarify what is happening for this specific module mode Scan Interface.

  Thank you

  Andy

  Hi Andy,.

  I had to have a quick sleep on this night to get my facts right, hope that the delay was too long!

  The minimum data listed in the 1613 samples/s are due to a forumla that uses the internal time base that is fairly well explained on page 20 of the Manual. The sweep period did not affect the rate of data, or to activate the anti-aliasing filter. My previous post was wrong in that sense, apologies!

  This page helps explain mode of scanning pretty well too, but the best way to explain it is that even if the frequency of the module can be attached to 1613 samples/s or higher, the compactRIO will collect only 1,000 of these samples a second, or in your case if you are using a rate of 10ms loop, 100 of these samples of 1613. The anti-aliasing cut will be based on 1613 x 0.45 as you said and so will be 725Hz (not based on the rate of loop as I mentioned incorrectly)

  In this case with these modules it is probably a good idea not to use a period of scanning slower than 1 msec for the reason you said - if you're worried about oversampling you can always you decimate readings in the software afterwards to take each readings from 1 to 10 (this page explains how do with an eerily similar situation!)

• The anti-aliasing filter selection

  Deal Sir

  I want to choose the anti-aliasing filter. I data collection in real time of current through NI Mseries 6281 DAQ probe. My sampling rate is 8 kHz and Total number of samples 40 k. What is the value of the frequency, should I choose for the anti-aliasing filter?

  Deep eyes

  Automata

  Yes. That should be fine.

  Lynn

• Full Screen anti-aliasing

  Well, today I have a question about disabling Full Screen anti-aliasing.  I installed Windows 7 on my Windows Vista OS in October when Windows 7 is released in stores.  I had a few games installed on my PC before upgrade me to Windows 7, but since I tried to install any game on my PC now that it works on Windows 7, the game will not play either or he advises me to disable the Full Screen anti-aliasing to play the games that I install.  The thing is, I don't know where to go to turn off Full Screen anti-aliasing.  I hope that it is in fact the resolution to resolve this issue.  Otherwise I won't be able to play the games that I like on my PC. Help me with this problem please.

  Hello

  You can check this link:

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/WPF/thread/1ad9a62a-d1a4-4ca2-A950-3b7bf5240de5/

  As a work-around to try to reduce accerelation of hardware on the computer and check.

  Here are a few steps to try following these steps and check:

  1. right click on the desktop and click on personalize.
  2. click display settings, and then click Advanced settings.
  3. click on the Troubleshooting tab, and then click on change settings.
  4 move the notches on both hardware acceleration slider to the left.
  5. click OK and then click Restart now.
  6. once the computer has restarted, test the game.

  It will be useful.

• anti-aliasing using the 9233

  
  

  Hi Jeff,

  The first thing that you should start with is a guide to the delta sigma converter:

  It is the ADC that is used on the 9233. The delta sigma converter has a built-in inherent anti-aliasing filter. If you look at the dynamic features section of 9233 operating manual it will show you some of the features of this filter. The filter is a digital and the bandwidth and the stopband are calculated according to the sampling rate, you specify the 9233. If you give a sampling frequency of 50 kHz,-3 dB attenuation point bandwidth will be 50 k * 0.45 = 22.5 kHz. If all the components below 22.5 kHz will be kept completely and everything above that will be alleviated. This ensures that you will get no aliasing.

  If you apply a 20 kHz filter after that you'll still good data because the threshold for the anti-aliasing filter is greater than the maximum sampling frequency (50 kHz).

  Please let me know if this clarifies this question a little better.