the use of the two styles, two groups in the same report?

Similar Questions

• Table of facts with 2 keys of time, measures showing together in the same report

  Hello
  
  I use OBI EE and I have the following scenario: a fact table hold information about the inquiries. An investigation may or may not generate a date. So in my table of facts, I have two date columns: date of application information and appointments for date (and not the date of the appointment itself, but when it was actually booked).
  
  This raises a few questions. First question is: I only have a FK logic at the time table, how to create two LFKs for these 2 dates? Should I create a logical table time in MDB, as well as from another dimension of time?
  
  Second question is how to display two data items in the same report. For example, in a report summary per month I want to see the number of demands and appointment reserved for each month. They will most probably different numbers and refer to different lines in the database. What is the best way to this model in the MDB?
  
  For example, in October, there are 10 questions, 8 of them were converted into appointments as well as 3 requests for information made in September. Thus, the report is expected to show for October: number of inquiries: 10, number of nominations: 11 (October 8 + 3 from September)
  
  Sorry if this is a basic question, but I couldn't find examples of this scenario.
  
  Thank you
  Luis

  Hi Luis,.

  I think you have the same problem as 'The phantom', three days ago. I guess that my solution also works for you:
  How to create a common hieracrhy calendar?

  Kind regards
  Stijn

• Multi on the same report filter conditions

  Hello
  
  
  I have a relationship with the different filter conditions.
  How to add these two reports? I tired to add the same report with different filter Pivot condition, but it is not allowing me to do.
  Can someone help me.
  
  Thanks in advance

  Hello
  Go to combine with a similar request, which may have different filters for different reports.

  Kind regards
  Srikanth

• Filters in the way different in the same report

  Hi all
  I have a question I got a tabular report with 10 columns that a column is a region it has two values, and I need to pass the filters based on this value if
  Region = 'Europe', it must pass
  case, parts of months filters,
  
  If region = 'Asia', it has to go
  months, case is possible to do
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  If I understand your requirement, when you give x filter only months, case, region columns must be seen and even with others too.
  In the responses, you can make a request of the union, and it would be this way
  Select month, case, region
  from table_name
  where region = 'Europe '.
  Union
  Select month, case, null
  from table_name
  where region = 'Asia.

  UPDATE POST
  always tells you when month value falls is CPS, then he must pass the filters?... but where you want to pass these filters? what you get from it? are the columns of filter exist in your query criteria

  hope helps you.

  See you soon,.
  KK

  Published by: Kranthi.K on March 25, 2011 20:08

• Use the dynamic report with BI Publisher parameters

  Are there tips for reports in BI Publisher? For example, I would use the same report for one person or many people. This would mean that where clause should be added when it is for the individual and is not necessary for the entire population. I don't see a way to dynamically build the report using "Report queries" in the shared components.
  It is easy to build a sql query based on various selection criteria in the Source to a pagethat of the region then gets displayedd on the page but I don't see a lot of flexibility in creating a report with BI Publisher at the Apex.

  How about from the collections?

  Denes Kubicek
  -------------------------------------------------------------------
  http://deneskubicek.blogspot.com/
  http://www.Apress.com/9781430235125
  http://Apex.Oracle.com/pls/OTN/f?p=31517:1
  http://www.Amazon.de/Oracle-Apex-XE-Praxis/DP/3826655494
  -------------------------------------------------------------------

• How to display data in the interactive report without colon (:)) column

  Dear gurus of the Apex,
  
  I am a beginner and you just create an application for the Apex of a worksheet. I created a list of named values and used in a box against a field in the page creation form default 3.
  
  When I selected several values in my box on the form, the data in the interactive report appear as a single line with a colon separating the values selected as follows: dog: Cat: bird
  
  What I would like is to have the data appear in the interactive report in a list like this multiline column:
  
  Dog
  CAT
  Bird
  
  I can work around this problem by modifying the SQL code in the Source region of the definition of the area of the report (interactive 1 Page by default) to replace the semicolon by < br >
  
  SELECT replace ("PETS_CHOSEN", ":","< br / > ')"PETS_CHOSEN", OF"MYAPP"Note: this is not format correctly in the display. I have replace the colon with a html br
  
  This works, but there seems to be a hack to me. I guess I missed an option simple setting somewhere, but I can't.
  
  The other problem with this solution is that when I export the report to Excel, that ship's dog < br > cat < br > Bird, which is seems worse than the colon.
  
  Thank you
  
  -Morgan
  
  Published by: mnrussel on February 16, 2009 04:13

  Hi Morgan,.

  I think you have at least two possibilities:

  1. replace the colon with "," (comma and space) - kind of reasonable on the screen and export

  2 create a second page that has the same report but use it "export: csv" model. Create a manual link to this page to replace the standard export binding. When these pages of the report are requested, they download immediately instead of display. So you can use commas in this one and < br > tags in the report to the screen version

  Andy

  ch - to display the tags in a post, use and lt; for < and & gt; for >

• Urgent: Error during the generation of the big report

  I'm getting below error when I run the report for long term. The report below will only run for one or two days. Please let me know how to fix this error. It's very urgent.

  

  while I'm the same report run for 2 days (30 records) it's execution and generate output. But when running for 8 days (200 folders) to show that the error

  based on that, you have to re - check the xml data and the logic model (exclude certain logics complex and step by step, recheck and add logic)

  looks like some data to lead to error can be by division or a molding to the number string or can be some special symbols

• Overview and details of the records in the same mixing ratio

  Hello, on the bottom I need to mix the results in the summary table and the records in the table of details in the same report.
  
  To create the scenario:
  

  CREATE TABLE ALPHA
  (
  ALPHA_ID     NUMBER,
  ALPHA_NR     NUMBER,
  ALPHA_TOTCT     NUMBER,
  ALPHA_FUND     NUMBER
  
  );
  
  ALTER TABLE ALPHA ADD (
       CONSTRAINT ALPHA_PK PRIMARY KEY (ALPHA_ID));
  ALTER TABLE ALPHA ADD (
       CONSTRAINT ALPHA_NR_UNI UNIQUE (ALPHA_NR));
  
  
  INSERT INTO ALPHA(ALPHA_ID, ALPHA_NR)
  VALUES( 1, 7 );
  INSERT INTO ALPHA(ALPHA_ID, ALPHA_NR)
  VALUES( 2, 11 );
  INSERT INTO ALPHA(ALPHA_ID, ALPHA_NR)
  VALUES( 3, 15 );
  INSERT INTO ALPHA(ALPHA_ID, ALPHA_NR)
  VALUES( 4, 17 );
  
  CREATE TABLE HIST
  (
  HIST_ID     NUMBER,
  HIST_NR NUMBER,
  HIST_ALPHA_NR NUMBER,
  HIST_CT          NUMBER,
  HIST_VAL     NUMBER,
  HIST_DATE     DATE
  
  );
  
  ALTER TABLE HIST ADD (
       CONSTRAINT HIST_PK PRIMARY KEY (HIST_ID));
  ALTER TABLE HIST ADD (
       CONSTRAINT HIST_NR_UNI UNIQUE (HIST_NR));
  ALTER TABLE HIST ADD (
       CONSTRAINT HIST_ALPHA_NR_FK FOREIGN KEY (HIST_ALPHA_NR) REFERENCES ALPHA ( ALPHA_NR ) );
  
  TRUNCATE TABLE HIST;
  
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 1 ,1    ,7 ,1 ,10 , TO_DATE('01.02.2009' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 2 ,6    ,7 ,1 ,10 , TO_DATE('01.05.2009' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 3 ,3    ,7 ,3 ,30 , TO_DATE('01.02.2010' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );
  
  
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 4 ,4    ,11 ,1 ,10 , TO_DATE('01.03.2009' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 5 ,5    ,11 ,-2 ,-20 , TO_DATE('01.06.2010' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 6 ,8    ,11 ,1 ,10 , TO_DATE('01.02.2011' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );
  
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 7 ,2    ,15 ,2 ,20 , TO_DATE('01.03.2009' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 8 ,7    ,15 ,5 ,50 , TO_DATE('01.06.2010' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 9 ,9    ,15 ,-4 ,-40 , TO_DATE('01.02.2011' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );
  
  INSERT INTO HIST( HIST_ID ,HIST_NR ,HIST_ALPHA_NR ,HIST_CT ,HIST_VAL ,HIST_DATE )
  VALUES ( 10 ,10    ,17 ,1 ,10 , TO_DATE('01.03.2011' , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) );

  To update the summary table, I used a view

  CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW HIST_AGG ( HIST_ALPHA_NR,  TOT_CT  , TOT_VAL )
  AS
  SELECT HIST_ALPHA_NR
  ,SUM ( NVL(HIST_CT, 0 ) ) TOT_CT
  ,SUM( NVL(HIST_VAL, 0) )  TOT_VAL
  
  FROM HIST
  GROUP BY HIST_ALPHA_NR;
  
  
  DECLARE
  
  CURSOR cur
  IS
  SELECT
  HIST_ALPHA_NR
  ,TOT_CT
  ,TOT_VAL
  FROM HIST_AGG
  ;
  
  BEGIN
  FOR rec IN cur
  LOOP
  
       UPDATE ALPHA
       SET ALPHA_TOTCT = rec.TOT_CT
       , ALPHA_FUND  = rec.TOT_VAL
       WHERE ALPHA_NR = rec.HIST_ALPHA_NR;
  
  END LOOP;
  
  END;

  First report should the line overview Alpha tracked table of all the detail records of
  HIST table and for each alpha_nr. At the end of report total overview
  alpha of the table.
  

  "SUMMARY";"ALPHA_NR";"ALPHA_TOTCT";"ALPHA_FUND";
  ;;;;
  ;7;5;50;
  ;7;1;10;01.02.2009
  ;7;1;10;01.05.2009
  ;7;3;30;
  ;11;0;0;
  ;11;1;10;01.03.2009
  ;11;-2;-20;01.06.2010
  ;11;1;10;01.02.2011
  ;15;3;30;
  ;15;2;20;01.03.2009
  ;15;5;50;01.06.2010
  ;15;-4;-40;01.02.2011
  ;17;1;10;
  ;17;1;10;01.03.2011
  "TOTAL_ALPHA_NR";4;9;90;

  Second report should display the overview by period (year), but the timeline
  for example the year 2009 begins from the year 2010. At the end of each year a summary for
  the current state.

  "YEAR";"ALPHA_NR";"ALPHA_TOTCT";"ALPHA_FUND"
  ;;;
  2009;7;0;0
  ;11;0;0
  ;15;0;0
  ;17;0;0
  "Total 2009";4;0;0
  2010;7;2;20
  ;11;1;10
  ;15;2;20
  ;17;0;0
  "Total 2010";4;5;50
  2011;7;5;50
  ;11;-1;-10
  ;15;7;70
  ;17;0;0
  "Total 2011";4;11;110
  2012;7;5;50
  ;11;0;0
  ;15;3;30
  ;17;1;10
  "Total 2012";4;9;90

  Hello

  wucis wrote:
  I now use this selection

  ...
  FROM       hist        h
  ,       alpha        a
  WHERE       h.hist_alpha_nr (+)     = a.alpha_nr
  AND       a.active          = 'Y'
  AND a.alpha_nr >=  NVL ( NULL  , 1 )
  AND a.alpha_nr <=  NVL ( NULL  , 10000 )
  AND a.alpha_date >= NVL ( TO_DATE( '02.01.2008'  , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) , '01.01.2000' )
  --AND h.hist_date  >= NVL ( TO_DATE( NULL  , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) , '01.01.2000' )
  --AND h.hist_date <= NVL ( TO_DATE( NULL  , 'dd.mm.yyyy' ) , '02.02.2222')
  ...
  

  The problem is now, if I limit the query about the h.hist_date, the lines disappear when there is no entry in HIST for this ALPHA_NR,
  in particular the line with alpha_nr = 12 disappears.

  When you use the old notation join, outer join, whenever a column of a table is marked with the + sign, then all the conditions in the WHERE clause that references the same table need a sign +. Otherwise, the effect is identical to an inner join.
  Using the old syntax, you must say something like:

  ...
  FROM       hist        h
  ,       alpha        a
  WHERE       h.hist_alpha_nr (+)     = a.alpha_nr
  AND       a.active          = 'Y'
  AND        a.alpha_nr          >=  1
  AND        a.alpha_nr           <=  10000
  AND        a.alpha_date           >=  TO_DATE ('01.01.2000', 'dd.mm.yyyy')
  AND        h.hist_date (+)     >=  TO_DATE ('01.01.2000', 'dd.mm.yyyy')
  AND       h.hist_date (+)     <=  TO_DATE ('02.02.2222', 'dd.mm.yyyy')
  ...
  

  Notice the + sign in the last 2 lines, after the columns in this table of reference h. I find the ANSI join syntax much more clear in this case.

  How you use NVL makes no sense. NVL (NULL, x) returns x, no matter what x is.
  What you trying to do? Perhaps you meant

  AND        NVL (a.alpha_nr, 1)          >=  1
  

• Filters in the way different on the same column

  http://img848.imageshack.us/i/screenshotwjk.PNG/
  
  If you take a look at the screen at the time there is view pivot that has about 10 columns one of them is the type of scene that always contains two values Foster Care child and current CPS, my requirement is if I click on the month column values if the month value is in the category Foster Care child, then he must pass three id filters , id of the person and if she has the current CPS then it must pass two filters case id and month is it possible if say me. I will be very happy if you can help out me.
  
  Thank you

  Already answered.

  Filters in the way different in the same report

• Sort a hyperlink column in the classic report

  4.2.1

  THM2:

  Hi I have a classic report with a hyperlink column. And I need enable sorting on this. What I did is

  Select '< a href = "somelink" >' | party_name | "< /a > ' party_name party_name table.

  However, I just need to show the hyperlink column in the report. Couple of questions

  1. How can I create party_name-based sorting logic using the updated classic sorting standard? Given that all a hyperlink names begin with < - sorting is random. I added the second party_name column an active by default sort on it, but given that the column can not be shown, is not a good way.

  2. I was wondering if there is another way to sort this classic report hyperlink column as shown in the hyperlink and sorting is enabled on the report?

  Thank you!

  ryansun wrote:

  Hi Fac586 - Yes, the requirements are not of the same report. We have several pages with the same type of aspect, however, some of them have a different feature. In this case, Yes, I too simplified it so that easier to understand. I use the hyperlinks on query sql rather that the link of the column is because we have about 5 unions in this query from different sources and each of those interviewing him, having a hypertext link and additional formatting like "BOLD", color etc, under certain conditions. Query1 will return only the party_name, the second query United would have hypertext links, the third would fat etc. The union of the request is not made to take into account this feature, but because of the nature of the data.  While the apex feature works very well, the only question I hit is the hyperlink column sorting in a classic report. Where the simplified question. Individual responses, I've had have been very useful and have been applied successfully.

  In this case, the request for a classic report that has column link, how to sort would work it would be on a regular character column.

  Option 1 (deeply inelegant): Generate an HTML comment containing the sort at the beginning of the column value. The value must be sortable using the character comparison semantics, so dates must follow the format YYYYMMDD, numbers padded to the same length with zeros etc: Re: problem with the Date command

  Option 2A: Expand the Expression HTML technique described in your previous thread (marking dynamically of columns in a "BOLD" for the highest value report) to include the tags.

  Option 2b: Use the HTML Expression technique described in the previous thread to include custom data attributes and use these to add links to dynamic actions.

  If this is done on several pages, and then create a view all the necessary logic and the columns which you can keep it in one place.

• How to recover the XMLP report after publication

  Requirement:*.
  There is a custom created page that has some data (all data is display only) on level 1. There is also a link on that level 1.
  When the user arrives on this page for a particular search (from the search page) values and on a level 1 line and click this link, an XMLP report must be generated and open.
  When the user comes to the same page with the same values of research and the same line at level 1 later, after some time/day, the XMLP report which came already should open instead of generating a new report XMLP.
  Therefore, the XMLP report has generated only once for a particular line of level 1 and should now be reused.
  
  Technique of the logic applied so far:*.
  The logic was written on the component.record.fieldchange of the link level 1.
  I was able to generate the XMLP data file. By using this data file, I was able to generate the report (in PDF) and publish as well.
  
  Creates the object:
  & oRptDefn = create PSXP_RPTDEFNMANAGER:ReportDefn(<Report_Definition_Name>);
  & oRptDefn.Get ();
  & oRptDefn.SetRuntimeDataXMLFile (< XML data file >);
  
  Set the outdestination:
  & oRptDefn.OutDestination = < Some Unix Path >;
  
  Report of the process called:
  & oRptDefn.ProcessReport (< name of the report definition model >, % language, date, & oRptDefn.GetDefaultOutputFormat ());
  
  And published:
  & oRptDefn.Publish ("PSUNX", "", "", 0);
  
  The report is published. I can view the report in pdf format on
  Main menu > Reporting tools > XML editor > search for XML report
  
  Question (which is also a roadblock):*.
  Now how should I proceed in order to open (display) the same report when the user clicks on the link to the level 1 again.
  How can I reopen this same report next time?
  I was wondering that if I get the report Id, and the process Instance (as displayed in the search for XML report), I can save for later use. So I can dynamically create the report using these 2 URL identifiers when the user clicks on the same link next time. But not able to get the correct values of these properties.
  After publication, & oRptDefn.ProcessInstance gives 0 instead of the process instance, as shown in the XML report search page.
  
  Please help with your expertise.

  The instance of the process number is automatically filled by PeopleSoft during the call to publish. However, the problem is that you cannot recover the instance number of processes assigned by PeopleCode after the call to publish. I think that this property has a use when you run the report through the process scheduler and not the application server (which is the case in this situation).

  Take a look at the PSRF_RINFO_TBL notice. In this recording all the XMLP reports will be stored by the report URL. Your condition said that when a user enters a component with a certain search criteria and a report has already generated so that criteria at level 1 should link to open that specific report. With the file PSRF_RINFO_TBL, you know what reports have been produced so far. The only thing you need then is to link a report to a specific search criteria. If you run a SQLExec on the PSRF_RINFO_TBL after you have published it you should be able to recover the process instance and the content id. If you add a record or some fields of the record exist for this component, you can bind the instance of process/contentid to search criteria. If a report already exists, you can use the code I posted in my previous post to open the report on the screen.

• change the connection of database for the FRS report

  Currently we use the model BSO ASO and all reports of FRS are recover against BSO Database.Now we are the conversion to the single model of ASO. can I use the same report on database of ASO.
  
  There is an option of connecting database chang under the tool in the workspace. will this work or do I have to redo all the reports
  
  can you please help me with this
  
  Thank you

  In the workspace just to discover > tools > change data connections > select report > choose new connection > fact.
  It can be changed by the same method

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Different guests on the same column

  Gurus:
  
  I have a requirement where we need to have Date guests separated for 4 different promotions.
  Now, I was thinking about the presentation configuration variable, but then it does not work with 'Between' condition.
  
  So how can I compare a fact for 4 different promotions (Sun) with 4 dates different (Sun) in the same report?
  
  I don't know if this is possible.
  Please help me.
  Thank you.
  
  Vinay

  I'm not sure that I understand your question completely, but it seems you need to get the same value (say sale) measure for 4 different dates in the same table.

  My suggestions would be to create dims again and use union all with each union report report led at different times of Sun.

• Cannot open the old reports councurrent in EBS R12.

  Hello

  Recently, we migratated to new server .after prod PROD migrate to the new iam trying to open the old concurrent reports its throughing server an error like "an error has occurred while that tries to establish a connection to Server Application files with the PROD11i node can be a network configuration problem, or the TNS listener on the node PROD11i may not run.» Please contact the system administrator.

  FYI,.

  Friday, before the migration, I run reports, report id is like '222222' I saw the output also... the next day I migrated to new server iam trying to open the same report PROD ' 222222' it through and especially error...»

  can you please suggest me any wrorkaround to open the old reports in new server...

  KannanG

  Hey Kevin,

  Please run command:

  FND_CONC_CLONE. SETUP_CLEAN.

  Follow the following note:

  Unable to display several old concurrent requests after Clone. (Doc ID 395284.1)

  Let us know if it helps you.

  Thank you &

  Best regards

• Excel not downloaded in the same order as on the interactive report

  I have download to Excel on the interactive report, it is not sorted in the same way? Can I fix this?

  Hi Doug,.

  Could be a quick solution to this solution, you can have a download link on the header of the report area and that it points to a page that contains the same report with the csv model.

  Download CSV Report 
  
  where 3 is the page number for csv output report.
  *replace click by onclick
  

  or if you want more control over the report, you can create a button on the interactive report region and at the click of the button run a process to download a csv output file.

  Put dummy code for creating csv file

  DECLARE
  CURSOR cEmp IS
  SELECT
       Eno,Ename,SAL,DEPT
  FROM emp_table ORDER BY 1 DESC, 2 DESC,4;
  BEGIN
       owa_util.mime_header('application/octet', FALSE );
          htp.p('Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Employee.csv"');
          owa_util.http_header_close;
  --Printer Header Row
       htp.p('Employee '  || ',' || 'Name'   || ',' || 'Salary'  || ','|| 'Department' ||  chr(13));
  for cThis in cEmp
  LOOP
            htp.p( '"'|| cThis.eno ||'"'||   ','|| '"'|| cThis.ename   || '"'|| ',' || cThis.sal||  ','|| '"'|| cThis.dept  || '"' || chr(13));
      END LOOP;
  htmldb_application.g_unrecoverable_error := true;
  EXCEPTION
            WHEN OTHERS THEN
                 htp.p('Download Error ' || SQLERRM || ' with error code ' || SQLCODE);
  END;
  

  Also, you can disable the download report link in the interactive report menu by going to reports-> Search bar attribute->, under include in the Actions Menu: uncheck the download option.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you
  Manish