transposed matrix form?

Similar Questions

• Matrix - vector lines and columns

  M1 (3,2) gives the element of line 3, column 2

  M1 (2) gives the second row of a matrix (as a vector line)

  Is there a way to return a column (other than transpose, store again and using the method above on the transposed matrix)?

  Tim Wessman wrote:
  

  Assuming that first here...

  Col(M1,1)

  Row(M1,1)

  @ Tim,.

  As Mmmm - created a post on the 39gii and commented on a post on the 39gii, this one is perhaps more likely to be on the 39gii?

  I think that your presumption re - expresses my presumption that the 39gii becomes brother forgot the premium?

  @ Mmmm.

  Try M1 (-c), where C is desired column number. For example M1(-2) for column 2.

• How can I make the matrix using numbers

  Yes, for now I'll try to find out how to use the numbers to do the multiplication of matrices

  Something like that?

  

  In cell A1, filled to the right and downwards:

  = SUMPRODUCT (Matrix 1::1:1, TRANSPOSE (matrix 2::A)))

  SG

• 1 x 1 scalar matrix

  Hello.

  I searched an answer for my problem in the forum but I couldn't, so here it is:

  When I multiply a 1 x 3 by its transposed matrix, which is a matrix of 3 x 1, I get a matrix 1 x 1 with a single scalar value. How can I turn it into a single scalar?

  Thanks in advance.

  A matrix is just a special type of table, you can use the Index Array function for this:

  

• Combine two objects that are close?

  During the livetrace matrix forms often get broken during their visit to vector, for example:

  

  I can't find an option to merge narrow shapes to unite and get rid of the whitespace. The only options I found that apply are if shapes overlap. Since these objects so much that I'd really like the ability to select several objects and unify their fractures livetrace railways, get rid of the white space. is this possible?

  These lines are often a few aberrations of the illustrator of smoothing onscreen, even when the adjoining paths, in fact, coincide.

  During the livetrace matrix forms often get broken during their time at vector

  There is no form of raster (in the plural). There is a raster image (its shape is rectangular). The image raster does not get broken. The raster image is not "transition to the vector."

  The autotrace program just trying to draw objects entirely new and distinct - traced - forms whose try correspond to groups of same color pixels in a raster image. The defintion of 'same' depends on the user specifies parameters of sensitivity.

  I'm not picking apart you with semantics simple here. Unrealistic expectations about matrix are epidemic these days, mainly because of claims of selling overvalued.

  I can't find an option to merge narrow shapes to unite and get rid of the whitespace.

  Fusion (Boolean union) is not logical for the railways without intersection. As long as the paths are not in reality, the distance between them has nothing to do with it. Imagine a circle of vector of one side of the page and a square of the vector on the other. What it would mean to "merge" the two forms into one?

  Without additional specific criteria, these two forms could be "merged" in your sense, in an infinite number of ways. If the accuracy of the autotrace (assigned by your settings and the real colors of the image) translates autotraced paths that don't, in fact, intersect, the autotrace will not be automatically some specific criteria to "merge" the railways without intersection.

  The only options I found that apply are if shapes overlap.

  Who has a sense, because that would be the areas of intersection itself that define the criteria by which the railways concerned are met.

  So if your autotrace is, indeed, yielding undesirable completely without intersection of the paths that you think should be a path, you must decrease the sensitivity of detection of color matrix settings so that the colors of the almost-but-not-quite-the-same pixels are interpreted as a region of contiguous color. But be aware that a change in parameters will affect matrix for the entire image, not just for this particluar region. So there may be other compromises in other areas of the image.

  Such is the nature of the matrix. It is not a clear and precise 'conversion' of a 'format' (raster) in another (vector) 'format'.

  Think of a fence of stone compared to a close of brick of the same size. Closing of natural stone is composed of stones of irregular shape, interconnected to minimize differences. The fence in brick made of rectangular bricks, same size, is perfectly attached.

  Matrix is an attempt to write a software algorithm that takes a particular brick fence (collection of same color pixel raster format) and to build an entirely new and separate stone Hedgerow (collection of traces in the form of various ways) of the same size. She does without any human intelligence or judgment artistic whatsoever as to what 'must' or 'no' be considered to be a "stone". How hard he tries to "custom chisel" each of these stones as more natual closely locking and minimize the gaps depends directly on the autotrace parameters. It's always a compromise compared to what would be done if the stones were individually carved by hand, eye and human judgment.

  JET

• How table output Qurey

  I have a request that out 100 records instead of display 100 in a row, I try to show in matrix form as of 20 X 5, but I am unable to do

  any suggestion?

  The usual method for this type of problem is to use the mod operator.

  
       
       
            
  
  
  #aValue#
       
            
  
       
  
  
  
  

• Transpose lines / columns entered for Matrix

  Hi all

  Read a few pages on the forums of the community about me little challenge, but come to the conclusion that using the OFFSET would be the way to go, but I'm struggling with the syntax. Maybe, I'm thinking of it (Note: similar to copy paste n + transpose into excel). The idea is to, first, build the frame of the matrix by using the information in table 1 and 2 below, then laster, fill the inter connection of cells with the data of table 2.

  The first step is to transpose the first two columns of table 2 for the columns in a table (highlighted) two first is OF 2 + is the main reference OF-3 and this is the main reference and so on.

  The number of entries in table 2 will increase with time, so it's easy to update with here simple fill.

  Played with "SHIFT" without success - based on a similar problem posted on an earlier version of numbers / iWorks. So, I am convinced it can be done this way - of ideas or suggestions would be very welcome.

  Thanks in advance

  Perry

  

  Select the source table (shifts right in your screenshot), then select the menu item "Table > transpose the rows and columns."

  now, select the area you want to move, copy

  now select the destination, the dough

• create some form data matrix bar codes

  I use Adobe Acrobat Pro DC and I created a bar code data matrix to help create form tools.

  How can I create a a barcode data matrix having a certain form and size of a PDF file?

  Hi bogdanb55773770,

  Right click on the bar code & select Properties, you get the dialog box to adjust the position. KB doc. using Acrobat help. PDF barcode form fields

  

  Kind regards
  Nicos

• Forms 11 g certification matrix

  Hello
  
  We are currently trying to find the matrix certification 11g of forms online without success...
  We are looking for an official statement for the logical server Web Forms 11g version vs version.
  
  That is to say.
  11.1.1.3 forms cannot be installed on a logic of Web 10.3.3
  10.3.5 web logic can be used for any version of forms
  
  etc.
  
  Thanks in advance
  Paul

  The Matrix certification for forms is here:

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/downloads/FMW-11gr1certmatrix.xls

  In short: the last group of patches for forms is 11.1.1.4. (), it will work with wls 10.3.4.

  so

  11.1.1.2-online wls 10.3.2 forms
  11.1.1.3-online wls 10.3.3 forms
  11.1.1.4-online wls 10.3.4 forms

  see you soon

• form matrix apex 4.0

  Hello
  Does anyone know a good example of a form of matrix (updatable)?
  
  I have the following three tables
  
  employees (primary key empno)
  projects (key primary prjno)
  
  and a table of intersection
  emp_proj
  with 3 columns (emp, not prjno) primary key
  and indication_assigned varchar2 (1), allowed values yes/no
  
  I want to create a form with horizontally all projects
  and vertically all employees
  
  then in the boxes of the matrix.
  
  Like this
  
  -KING CLARK ADAMS
  x x o project_a
  project_b o x x
  
  
  
  any ideas?
  Best regards Erik

  here goes: *matrix with Checkbox report (saved the State checked and unchecked)*.

• How to create registration form data Matrix

  Hi all
  
  
  
  I want to create a form in the style of the matrix. Example: < strong > emp < facilities > table I would like to display / enter the No. Dept < strong > vertically < facilities > and < strong > locations horizontally < facilities >.
  
  
  
  Example is shown below:
  
  
  
  < strong > < em > DEPT < /em > 10 20 30 40
  
  < em > Loc < /em > < / strong >
  
  
  
  NY < strong > < facilities > XX YY ZZ OO
  
  
  
  < Strong > CA < facilities > AA BB CC DD
  
  
  
  < Strong > < facilities > CC AA PP OO
  
  
  
  Can the ease with which I I create? Is there a property to set the data as an array, so that I can create the data block so easily? Also all data must be updated in the table.
  

  Create a datablock on a "query from clause' as

  (
  SELECT 1 LOCATION_ID,
         1 DEPT1,
         1 DEPT2,
         1 DEPT3,
         1 DEPT4,
         1 DEPT5
    FROM DUAL
  )
  

  Use as many dummy columns as you plan enter as a "horizontal" group, I guess just 5 to keep things simple.

  In the PRE-QUERY-trigger of the block of rewrite the query 'from clause' as

  DECLARE
    CURSOR crDept IS
      SELECT DEPARTMENT_ID
        FROM DEPARTMENTS
        ORDER BY DEPARTMENT_ID;
    vcQuery VARCHAR2(32000):='(SELECT LOCATION_ID,';
    i PLS_INTEGER:=0;
  BEGIN
    FOR rec IN crDept LOOP
      i:=i+1;
      vcQuery:=vcQuery || ' SUM(CASE WHEN d.DEPARTMENT_ID='  || TO_CHAR(rec.DEPARTMENT_ID || ' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS DEPT' || TO_CHAR(i) || ',';
    END LOOP;
    -- cut last comma
    vcQuery:=SUBSTR(vcQuery, 1, LENGTH(vcQuery)-1);
    vcQuery:=vcQuery || ' FROM departments d, employees e where d.department_id=e.department_id GROUP BY LOCATION_ID)';
  
    SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('MYBLOCK', QUERY_DATASOURCE_NAME, vcQuery);
  END;
  

  Now, if you run a query on your block, the query will be rewritten to get the sum of each Department until column, each row contains the amounts for a place.

  To run, you would have to deal with some additional tasks such as hiding / display of unused columns in the layout...

  I hope this helps.

• HELP required on forming the matrix of data using PL/SQL

  Hi all
  
  I'm new on this thread and need your help in this regard.
  
  I have a requirement for the construction of a matrix of 5000 X 5000 using PL/SQL. My original data tables have 5000 lines each and I need to make a correlation analysis using these data and need to store in a physical table, and not in memory. This feat feasible the simple use of PL/SQL? I understand that Oracle DB has a limit of 1000 columns (but not sure) and so I would like to know if there is a workaround for this kind of scenario. If not, what are the other alternative methods to achieve this feat? Do I need to use any 3rd party tools to do this? A quick response from experts is highly appreciated.
  
  Thanking you in advance all the gurus.
  
  Rgds
  
  SAI

  1006089 wrote:

  I have a requirement for the construction of a matrix of 5000 X 5000 using PL/SQL.

  Possible. But this will require a large part of the memory. As PL/SQL is a language server side, this means the server's memory. That means server potential resource problems.

  And that the server environment is a multiprocessu multi-user environment, it also means potentially several copies of this code of matrix running multiple processes, each putting a request very heavy on the resources of the server. Is no longer a matter of potential server resources, but a guarantee... (exactly the same problem if you use app server architecture and Java or .net)

  You have to ask what is the cracking of data, server-side language? The answer is SQL. No PL/SQL. SQL runs rings around PL/SQL, Java, C/C++ and other languages when it comes to complex, fast and scalable, processing of large volumes of data.

  So you ask yourself why use PL/SQL? With his expensive server memory footprint? SQL and not SQL tables that are designed to deal with massive data effectively and efficiently?

• EMERGENCY required on forming the matrix of data using PL/SQL

  Hi all
  
  I'm new to this thread and need your emergency assistance in this regard.
  
  I have a requirement for the construction of a matrix of 5000 X 5000 using PL/SQL. My original data tables have 5000 lines each and I need to make a correlation analysis using these data and need to store in a physical table, and not in memory. This feat feasible the simple use of PL/SQL? I understand that Oracle DB has a limit of 1000 columns (but not sure) and so I would like to know if there is a workaround for this kind of scenario. If not, what are the other alternative methods to achieve this feat? Do I need to use any 3rd party tools to do this? A quick response from experts is highly appreciated.
  
  Thanking you in advance all the gurus.
  
  Rgds
  
  SAI

  DOUBLE WIRE!

  Now that you have published in your question in the forum SQL and PL/SQL please mark this thread ANSWERED.

• Using a matrix with variables in it.

  Hi all, I'm new on my HP 50 g so it can be easier that I am make it look like.

  I'm writing an equation for my strength of class material. The equation is the following:

  K = ((E*A)/L) * [C ^ C * S 2 - C ^ 2 - C * S]
  [C * S S ^ 2 - C * S S ^ 2]

  [- C ^ 2 - C * S C ^ C * S 2]

  [-C * S S ^ C * S 2 S ^ 2]

  The matrix is a 4 x 4. I need to be able to assign values to E, A, L and the largest C & S. So basically, I just need a scalar multiplied by a matrix. I can't find a way to make it work.

  Anyone would be able to help out me?

  I use RPN and CAS mode only has verified digital mode. I am really new to the HP 50 g but I can pass anything as longa s we can make this work!
  
  Thank you!

  If you want to multiply many different measurers to the matrix,

  or replace it with many different values of S, C, E, A, L, the best way is the following

  store the original matrix (again, in this example, only using 2 lines of the matrix)

  [[' C ^ 2 ' * IT '-C ^ 2' '-(S*C)']]
  [[THE OF * c ^ 2' '-(S*C)' '-(S^2)']]

  "MAT".

  STO

  the matrix is now stored in a variable called MAST

  now store the meter

  ' E * A/L '.

  "SCAL".

  STO

  the meter is stored in a variable called SCAL

  now for the original equation

  "SCAL * MAST '"

  « K »

  STO

  now for the first group of variables

  5

  « E »

  STO

  6

  « A »

  STO

  7

  « L »

  STO

  8

  THE OF '

  STO

  9

  « C »

  STO

  all variables have now assigned values

  Press the VAR

  to make sure that the variables are showing on the keys F1 to F6

  Press the key to display for K

  EVAL

  SIMPLIFY (or ENLARGE ENLARGE)

  

  and if you want the solutions of matrix in decimal form, press SHIFT RIGHT-> NUM (key)

  

  to change the values of variables, for example, 'L', it is very simple... a value of 20 L

  ENTER 20

  LEFT SHIFT

  L key (note that, to the left, then the selection key for the variable to be stored in the format works only in mode RPL NOT algebraic mode)

  now to reassess the matrix * equation Measurer

  K key

  EVAL

  SIMPLIFY (or ENLARGE ENLARGE)

  

  If you want to change the scaler, the same process.

  "L * E * A + 13'.

  LEFT SHIFT

  softkey SCAL

  K key

  EVAL

  SIMPLIFY (or ENLARGE ENLARGE)

  to change the matrix...

  softkey MAST

  DOWN (this automatically the matrix in the matrix writer application)

  Edit the required cells, and then press enter

  with the matrix now published on stack level 1

  LEFT SHIFT

  softkey MAST

  K key

  EVAL

  SIMPLIFY (or ENLARGE ENLARGE)

  etc...

• Exponential of a matrix

  Hello

  I am trying to find a way to calculate the exponential matrix on the 50 g.

  Given A [[3 0 0.0 2 1.0 0 2]]

  Result (exp(t*A)): [[exp3t exp2t 0.0 0 t * exp2t, 0 exp2t 0]]

  What I've tried so far:

  DIAGMAP (http://goo.gl/12ZruS) -> diagonalizable matrix not

  EXPAT off Expastic (http://www.hpcalc.org/details.php?id=4641) -> gives something strange in the way of the Delta (X) / VX-3, where the exp3t must be placed

  Any tips on that?

  Concerning

  Sorry for my bad English...
  
  Given A = [[3 0 0.0 2 1.0 0 2]]
  
  Let A = B + C with:
  
  B = [[3 0 2 0.0 0.0 0 2]] where B is diagonalizable
  C = [[0 0 0 0.0 1.0 0 0]] where C is "nilpotent" (English word)?   like C² = 0
  And we know that the exponential of a nilpotent matrix (C² = 0) is: e ^ C = I + C (general case is for C ^ k = 0 is e ^ C = I + C + C²/2! + C ^ 3/3! +...) C ^(k-1) /(k-1)!
  
  The form e ^ A = e ^(B+C) = e ^ B.e ^ C

  We can do:

  [[3 0 0,0 0,0 2 2 0]] STO 'B '.
  
  [[0 0 0 0.0 1.0 0 0]] 'C' STO
  
  B 't' * 'Exp (x)"DIAGMAP
  
  C C IDN 't' * +.
  
  *
  
  SIMPLIFY

  

  If you often have this type of matrix (with a diagonal and another element), you wrote a small program to automate this...