Tunnel of speaks of talking DMVPN routing via hub

Similar Questions

• PIX v7 speaks to talk about vpn access via the hub of pix

  Hello

  Does anyone know if the v7 PIX code supports the overs speaks of talking about VPN connectivity?

  For example, 3 sites, Hub, to talk to and A of spoke spoke of b and B connect in the hub (PIX) with VPN.

  With earlier versions of the software, the rays would not be able to communicate. Is this possible with the new version of the code?

  Thank you

  Hello

  As long as the hub is running v7, you should be able to do. See

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00804675ac.shtml

  for an example.

  HTH

  Kind regards

  Cathy

• DMVPN and INTERNET VIA HUB RENTAL ISSUES

  Hello everyone,

  I really wish you can help me with the problem I have.

  I explain. I test a double Hub - double DMVPN Layout for a client before we set it up in actual production.
  The client has sites where routers are behind some ISP routers who do NAT.

  

  How things are configured:

  -All rays traffic must go through the location of the hub if no local internet traffic on the rays.
  -Hub 1 and 2 hub sends a default route to rays through EIGRP. But only Hub 1 is used.
  -Hub 1 is the main router to DMVPN. In case of connection / hardware failure of the Internet Hub 2 become active for DMVPN and Internet.
  -Hub 1 and 2 hub are both connected to an ISP and Internet gateway for rays.
  -Hub 1 and 2 hub are configured with IOS Firewall.
  -On the shelves I used VRF for separate DMVPN routning Global routning table so I could receive a default route of 1 Hub and Hub 2 to carry the traffic of rays to the Internet via the location of the hub

  What works:

  -All rays can have access to the local network to the location of the hub.
  -All the rays can do talk of talk
  -Working for DMVPN failover
  -Rais NOT behind the router NAT ISP (i.e. the public IP address) directly related to their external interface can go Internet via hub location and all packages are inspected properly by the IOS and Nat firewall properly
   
  What does not work:

  -Rays behind the NAT ISP router can not access Internet via Hub location. They can reach a local network to the location of the hub and talk of talks.
  IOS Firewall Router hub shows packages from rays of theses (behind a NAT) with a source IP address that is the router og PSI of public IP address outside the interface. Not the private address LAN IP back spoke.
  In addition, the packets are never natted. If I do some captge on an Internet Server, the private source IP is the IP LAN to the LAN behind the rays. This means that the hub, router nat never these packages.

  How to solve this problem?

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabel - Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

  Well I don't know that's why I need your help/advice :-)

  I don't know that if I have to configure a VRF on the location of the hub gets also like things might mess upward.

  The problem seems to be NAT - T the rays that are not behind a NAT, among which go over the Internet through a Hub and inspection of Cisco IOS and NAT are trying to find.

  I tested today with the customer at the start them talking behind nat could ping different server on the Internet but not open an HTTP session. DNS was to find work. The IOS Firewall has been actually

  inspection of packages with private real IP address. Then I thought it was a MTU issue, so I decided to do a ping on the Internet with the largest MTU size and suddenly the pings were no more.

  I could see on the router Hub1 IOS Firewall was inspecting the public IP of the ISP NAT router again alongside with rays and not more than the actual IP address private. Really strange!

  Attached files:

  I attach the following files: a drawing of configuration called drawing-Lab - Setup.jpeg | All files for HUB1, BRANCH1 and BRANCH2 ISP-ROUTER configs, named respectively: HUB1.txt, BRANCH1.txt, BRANCH2.txt and ISP - ROUTER .txt

  Hub1 newspapers when ping host 200.200.200.200 on the Internet of Branch2 (behind the NAT ISP router):

  Branch2 #ping vrf DMVPN-VRF 200.200.200.200 source vlan 100

  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 200.200.200.200, time-out is 2 seconds:
  Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.110.1
  .....
  Success rate is 0% (0/5)

  * 06:04:51.017 Jul 15 UTC: % FW-6-SESS_AUDIT_TRAIL_START: start session icmp: initiator (110.10.10.2:8) - answering machine (200.200.200.200:0)

  If the IOS Firewall does not inspect the true private source IP address that can be, in this case: 192.168.110.2. He sess on the public IP address.

  HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
  Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
  UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500

  There is no entry for packets of teas present NAT

  Captge on Tunnel 1 on Hub1 interface (incoming packets in):

  7 7.355997 192.168.110.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo
  So that the firewall controllable IOS to the 110.10.10.2:8 public IP sniffing capture said that the package come from private real IP address

  Inhalation of vapours on the server (200.200.200.200) with wireshark:

  114 14.123552 192.168.110.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

  If the private IP address of source between local network of BRANCH2 is never natted by HUB1

  If the server sees the address source IP private not natted although firewall IOS Hub1 inspect the public IP address 110.10.10.2:8

  Hub1 newspapers when ping host 200.200.200.200 on the Internet of Branch1 (not behind the NAT ISP router):

  Branch1 #ping vrf DMVPN-VRF 200.200.200.200 source vlan 100

  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 200.200.200.200, time-out is 2 seconds:
  Packet sent with a source 192.168.100.1 address
  !!!!!

  * 06:05:18.217 Jul 15 UTC: % FW-6-SESS_AUDIT_TRAIL_START: start session icmp: initiator (192.168.100.1:8) - answering machine (200.200.200.200:0)

  This is so the firewall sees the actual private IP which is 192.168.100.1

  HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
  Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
  UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:22 192.168.100.1:22 200.200.200.200:22 200.200.200.200:22

  The real private source IP address is also find natted 1 Hub outside the public IP address

  Captge on Tunnel 1 on Hub1 interface (incoming packets in):

  8 7.379997 192.168.100.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

  Real same as inspected by IOS Firewall so all private IP address is y find.

  Inhalation of vapours on the server (200.200.200.200) with wireshark:

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabel - Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

  67 10.441153 80.10.10.2 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

  So, here's all right. The address is natted correctly.

  __________________________________________________________________________________________

  Best regards

  Laurent

  Hello

  Just saw your message, I hope this isn't too late.

  I don't know what your exact problem, but I think we can work through it to understand it.

  One thing I noticed was that your NAT ACL is too general. You need to make it more

  specific.  In particular, you want to make sure that it does not match the coming of VPN traffic

  in to / out of the router.

  For example you should not really have one of these entries in your NAT translation table.

  HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
  Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
  UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500

  Instead use:

  Nat extended IP access list
  deny ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 connect
  allow an ip
  deny ip any any newspaper

  If you can use:

  Nat extended IP access list
  deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 connect
  IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 everything
  deny ip any any newspaper

  Also, I would be very careful with the help of the "log" keyword in an ACL, NAT.

  I saw problems.

  What are the IOS versions do you use?

  Try to make changes to the NAT so that you no longer see the entries of translation NAT

  for packages of NAT - T (UDP 4500) in the table of translation NAT on the hub. It may be

  This puts a flag on the package structure, that IOS Firewall and NAT is

  pick up on and then do the wrong thing in this case.

  If this does not work then let me know.

  Maybe it's something for which you will need to open a TAC case so that we can

  This debug directly on your installation.

  Mike.

• DMVPN router behind ASA - need help please.

  Hello

  After reading many other discussions on this topic, it appears with the correct IOS and NAT - T active router, you bring up DMVPN behind a NAT device.

  I tried to perform this task, but I can not even phase 1 going to the DMVPN. The routing was checked and I can ping the routers DMVPN public IP. I'm sure that the configurations for routers are good, but asked if any additional NAT is required on the ASA.

  Here is the topology:

  Plate rotating DMVPN > ASA > Internet > ASA > DMVPN Branch

  The SAA on the side of the hub is in our data center and in production with several site-to-site and traffic to DMZ. Devices DMVPN is a Cisco 2921 and 1921. When I run a "debug crypto isakmp" on both routers, I see ISAKMP messages are sent on the branch DMVPN router. Nothing in the hub and no hits on the ASA ACL. I tried both the public IP address and the private IP address of the ACL on the ASA.

  I have attached the relevant training and can post more if necessary.

  Thank you

  Brandon

  Hello

  I finally had time to laboratory it.

  I used this topology:

  I have

  DMVPN - nat.png

  

  ASA (config) # sh run nat
  NAT (INSIDE, OUTSIDE) static source HUB-ROUTER-REAL-IP interface service udp-eq-4500 udp-eq-4500
  NAT (INSIDE, OUTSIDE) static source HUB-ROUTER-REAL-IP interface service udp-eq-500 udp-eq-500
  !
  object network HUB
  dynamic NAT interface (INSIDE, OUTSIDE)

  ASA (config) # sh run access-list
  extended OUTSIDE permitted udp access list any HUB-ROUTER-REAL-IP eq isakmp object
  list access extended OUTSIDE permitted udp any eq HUB-ROUTER-REAL-IP 4500

  R2 #sh run inter t0

  interface Tunnel0
  172.16.0.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  no ip redirection
  no ip next-hop-self eigrp 1
  no ip split horizon eigrp 1
  dynamic multicast of IP PNDH map
  PNDH id network IP-99
  source of tunnel FastEthernet0/0
  multipoint gre tunnel mode
  tunnel key 100000
  Tunnel ipsec DMVPN-IPSEC-PROFILE protection profile

  So it should be the same configuration that you use.

  The only thing is that I had to ' stop/no shut' tunnel interface and removing some config that I also need to clear the connection on the ASA using "clear conn."

  R2 #sh dmvpn
  Legend: Attrb--> S - static, D - dynamic, I - incomplete
  Local N - using a NAT, L-, X - no Socket
  # Ent--> entries number of the PNDH with same counterpart NBMA
  State of the NHS: E--> RSVPs, R--> answer, W--> waiting
  UpDn time--> upward or down time for a Tunnel
  ==========================================================================

  Interface: Tunnel0, IPv4 PNDH details
  Type: hub, PNDH peers: 2,.

  # Ent Peer NBMA Peer Tunnel Addr add State UpDn Tm Attrb
  ----- --------------- --------------- ----- -------- -----
  1 200.20.0.10 172.16.0.2 UNTIL 00:11:28
  1 200.30.0.10 172.16.0.3 AT 00:11:22

  R2 #.

• Printer Officejet 6500 E709a wire to the router via USB

  Can I connect my Officejet 6500 E709a via the USB connection to my router 9100EM Ultraline series 3 model so that it can be seen by both of my PC, which is connected directly to the router via LAN Ethernet ports? If so, what measures are necessary? At the present time, the printer is connected via USB to a PC and the other PC cannot use the printer, unless the first PC is on.

  I gave up on the online software update from HP for the Officejet 6500 E709a and removed it. So, I just use my old CD to install the printer, this time to install it as a printer wired ethernet, which worked. Thanks for trying to help.

• I have my printer connected to my router via a usb cable... I also have my (Vista) computer connected to the router by ethernet cable. How can I set the computer to print on my prints through the router?

  I have my printer connected to my router via a usb cable. I also have my (Vista) computer connected to the router by ethernet cable. How can I set the computer to print to my printer via the router?

  Usually, you need to install the printing software / drivers on your PC, configured / installed specially for a printer "remote" (its an option in the installation of the printer software)

• Migration phase 3 DMVPN with Central Hub

  I'm looking at the migration of my network DMVPN phase 2 phase 3. The current system contains 3 regional poles each serving about 100 rays. The final goal is to be able to build tunnels speaks to talk between sites that are hosted to the hubs in different regions. I understand from reading the document "Migrating from Dynamic Multipoint VPN Phase 2 phase 3" regional poles of phase 3 can be related in a hierarchy through a central hub, but there are no details in the doc and I was not able to find a white paper that addresses this specifically. Someone at - it experience with this topology or have the material regarding the deployment and configuration of nodal point?

  Kind regards

  Mike

  Mike,

  DMVPN phase 3 is still a valid design choice, even if we are heading for FlexVPN/IKEv2 combo (eventually finished on ASRs)

  That being said, the deployment is quite easy:

  -Shortcuts PNDH (+ redirect PNDH, really unnecessary during stable operation) on the shelves

  -Redirect PNDH on the hubs.

  Generally on regional hubs you would have a tunnel interface to the rays and the other (like talking) tunnel to the global hubs, remember that they must belong to the same network PNDH (i.e. same id PNDH network).

  Now according to your choice Routing Protocol (BGP dimensionnera better, obviously), it's just a matter of right summarized advertising and setting the delays and costs.

  The top level I know, if you want to read, google "BRKSEC DMVPN" you will find some different item of Cisco Live/Networkes of the past - my resource of choice.

  M.

• DMVPN with 2 Hubs

  (1) if I understand correctly - Phase 1 DMVPN is Star technology. Is it possible to use two hubs of the network?

  (2) is it possible to use the router 1841 as Phase 1 DMVPN hub?

  (3) imagine this network topology:

  * PIX *-(static vpn tunnel)-> router 1841 (hub)-(dynamic vpn tunnel)-> rays.

  I'm having problems with routing in VPN between PIX and rays through 1841?

  In the attachment, see diagram.

  Thnx in advance!

  Hello

  It should be possible. The tunnel between the PIX and Hub 2 is going to be a regular with PIX IPSEC tunnel configured with all networks to talk as destination the ACL crypto and vice versa on the hub. Hub 2 will have a static route for the private subnet route tis and PIX will be redestributed in the routing process so that it is announced to the rays. Please keep in mind that the protection tunnel profile you are configuring should have configured 'shared' keyword.

  HTH,

  Please rate if this can help.

  Kind regards

  Kamal

• Speaking of talk (VIGOR to CISCO) routing

  Hi all

  I have a problem with my config, it's a 7 rays star configuration. The address of the network hub is the 192.168.6.0.

  I wish that sites spoke to communicate to other rays through the hub. The site talks are the routers of the force and the hub is a cisco 1842, the routing table is present on the vigors. I assume it's an ACL problem, but I've spent the last 3 hours trying figure this one and got no where, can anyone help?

  I also nat has ports 80, 443, that work very well from outside the local network, but do not work inside? Anyone got any suggestions?

  Thank you

  Mark

  192.168.6.0 HUB

  192.168.18.0 TALK

  192.168.23.0 TALK

  192.168.28.0 SPEAKS

  192.168.48.0 TALK

  192.168.78.0 TALK

  192.168.88.0 TALK

  192.168.108.0 TALK

  10.0.0.0 SPEAKS

  Current configuration: 4558 bytes

  !

  version 12.4

  horodateurs service debug datetime msec

  Log service timestamps datetime msec

  no password encryption service

  !

  BURTON hostname

  !

  boot-start-marker

  boot-end-marker

  !

  enable secret 5 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  activate the password xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  !

  No aaa new-model

  IP cef

  !

  !

  property intellectual auth-proxy max-nodata-& 3

  property intellectual admission max-nodata-& 3

  !

  !

  name of the server IP 62.XX.x.2

  name of the server IP 195.xxx.xxx.10

  !

  !

  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-692553461

  enrollment selfsigned

  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 692553461

  revocation checking no

  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-692553461

  !

  !

  TP-self-signed-692553461 crypto pki certificate chain

  certificate self-signed 01

  308201A 5 A0030201 02020101 3082023C 300 D 0609 2A 864886 F70D0101 04050030

  2 060355 04031325 494F532D 53656 C 66 2 AND 536967 6E65642D 43657274 30312E30

  69666963 36393235 35333436 31301E17 313031 31323530 39353934 0D 6174652D

  315A170D 2E302C06 1325494F 03550403 32303031 30313030 30303030 5A 303031

  532D 5365 6C662D53 69676E65 4365 72746966 69636174 652 3639 32353533 642D

  06092A 86 4886F70D 01010105 34363130 819F300D 0003818D 00308xxx 02818100

  BA51CDF7 D418D270 7DCE516E 1ADE6DF5 82FE4507 CD1EBE0A 4B6E4B15 9A3C20ED

  B1D19FC9 63D0B925 0A4611FF CE8D935C 264FC3FE DF8BFAC2 76EC38ED 68115F43

  20A68D85 C04A564E 8BDE86FE 127F79B4 8E123D9C 8430940C BCD5CDA4 ADAAE387

  FA1E14A6 ECF92197 0CF54E89 B33915E7 A4E01EC7 CE45DDF6 AA60D168 38C92E67

  02030100 01A 36630 03551 D 13 64300F06 0101FF04 05300301 01FF3011 0603551D

  11040A 30 08820642 5552544F 4E301F06 23 04183016 03551D 8014645E 3FDE4E90

  A8773580 81EE4217 F4821238 993A301D 0603551D 0E041604 14645E3F DE4E90A8

  77358081 EE4217F4 3A300D06 01040500 03818100 86F70D01 82123899 092A 8648

  914EE910 C1EFCDB3 2C3B277B 45E4149F B8A78E94 94D6558F 7A1D5B45 D057DC02

  1FCF0C28 5B29728B 9480E807 D7E7DF9E 751DD005 E108D94B 6B3FC03B 8EB1603B

  9AF1E4CA 49067084 5B906C74 4D07217A 13FD0113 B721068A 3EC6C990 54101B4B

  FC9860E4 3xxxB064 586EC91D EF7C5A8F 8BBF33C6 29BCF148 A7E2B987 F2A028F8

  quit smoking

  !

  !

  !

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  life 3600

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 5

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxxxxx address 77.xxx.xxx.176

  ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxxxxx address 85.xxx.xxx.85

  ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxxxxx address 85.xxx.xxx.9

  ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxxxxx address 85.xxx.xxx.81

  ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxxxxx address 85.xxx.xxx.228

  ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxxxxx address 85.xxx.xxx.153

  ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxxxxx address 85.xxx.xxx.10

  ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxxxxxx address 85.xxx.xxx.61

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 3DES-SHA

  Crypto ipsec transform-set AES - SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set compression-SHA-3DES esp-3des esp-hmac-sha-comp-lzs

  Crypto ipsec transform-set AES-SHA-compression, hmac-sha-esp esp - aes comp-lzs

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp cm-transformset-1-esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-sha-hmac this_should_work

  !

  card card-VPN-1 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  the value of 77.xxx.xxx.176 peer

  Set transform-set this_should_work

  match the stores addresses

  !

  card crypto ipsec VPN - card - 1 isakmp 11

  the value of 85.xxx.xxx.85 peer

  Set transform-set this_should_work

  match address dalby

  !

  card card-VPN-1 12 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  the value of 85.xxx.xxx.9 peer

  Set transform-set this_should_work

  match address braintree

  !

  card card-VPN-1 13 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  the value of 85.xxx.xxx.81 peer

  Set transform-set this_should_work

  match address corby

  !

  card card-VPN-1 14 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  the value of 85.xxx.xxx.228 peer

  Set transform-set this_should_work

  match against glasgow

  !

  card card-VPN-1 15 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  the value of 85.xxx.xxx.153 peer

  Set transform-set this_should_work

  match address hadleigh

  !

  card card-VPN-1 16 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  the value of 85.xxx.xxx.10 peer

  Set transform-set this_should_work

  northwich match address

  !

  card card-VPN-1 17 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  the value of 85.xxx.xxx.61 peer

  Set transform-set this_should_work

  match address wycombe

  !

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  Description $ETH - LAN$

  IP 192.168.6.40 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  no ip address

  Shutdown

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  !

  ATM0/0/0 interface

  no ip address

  no ip mroute-cache

  No atm ilmi-keepalive

  Bundle-enable

  DSL-automatic operation mode

  PVC 0/38

  aal5mux encapsulation ppp Dialer

  Dialer pool-member 1

  !

  !

  ATM0/1/0 interface

  no ip address

  no ip mroute-cache

  No atm ilmi-keepalive

  Bundle-enable

  DSL-automatic operation mode

  PVC 0/38

  aal5mux encapsulation ppp Dialer

  Dialer pool-member 1

  !

  !

  interface Dialer0

  the negotiated IP address

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  encapsulation ppp

  Dialer pool 1

  Dialer-Group 1

  PPP reliable link

  Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol

  PPP chap hostname xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  PPP chap password 0 xxxxxxxx

  PPP ipcp dns request

  reorganizes the PPP link

  multilink PPP Panel

  PPP multilink sliding 16 mru

  period of PPP multilink fragment 10

  Panel multilink PPP interleave

  multiclass multilink PPP

  card crypto card-VPN-1

  !

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0

  !

  IP http server

  IP http secure server

  overload of IP nat inside source list 100 interface Dialer0

  !

  corby extended IP access list

  ip licensing 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255

  northwich extended IP access list

  ip licensing 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.23.0 0.0.0.255

  wycombe extended IP access list

  ip licensing 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.28.0 0.0.0.255

  hadleigh extended IP access list

  ip licensing 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.48.0 0.0.0.255

  extended IP access list stores

  ip licensing 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.78.0 0.0.0.255

  dalby extended IP access list

  ip licensing 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.88.0 0.0.0.255

  glasgow extended IP access list

  ip licensing 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.108.0 0.0.0.255

  braintree extended IP access list

  ip licensing 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255

  IP Internet traffic inbound-ACL extended access list

  permit any isakmp udp host 77.xxx.xxx.176 eq

  allow a host 77.xxx.xxx.176 esp

  permit any isakmp udp host 85.xxx.xxx.85 eq

  allow a host 85.xxx.xxx.85 esp

  permit any isakmp udp host 85.xxx.xxx.9 eq

  allow a host 85.xxx.xxx.9 esp

  permit any isakmp udp host 85.xxx.xxx.81 eq

  allow a host 85.xxx.xxx.81 esp

  permit any isakmp udp host 85.xxx.xxx.228 eq

  allow a host 85.xxx.xxx.228 esp

  permit any isakmp udp host 85.xxx.xxx.153 eq

  allow a host 85.xxx.xxx.153 esp

  permit any isakmp udp host 85.xxx.xxx.10 eq

  allow a host 85.xxx.xxx.10 esp

  permit any isakmp udp host 85.xxx.xxx.61 eq

  allow a host 85.xxx.xxx.61 esp

  !

  access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.78.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.88.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.18.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.48.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.23.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.28.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 deny ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.108.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255 any

  Dialer-list 1 ip protocol allow

  public RO SNMP-server community

  !

  !

  control plan

  !

  !

  Line con 0

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  password: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  opening of session

  !

  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000

  end

  Also check this important Information on Vigor holding ipsec his.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/257320?decorator=print&displayFullThread=true

  Manish

• L L VPN routing via alternative tunnel... mesh?

  Hi all

  We have a L - L IPSEC tunnel between our head office and a hosting company, everything works fine, solid as a rock. But we now have a requirement for one of our branches to also run a tunnel to the host, but for cost and control reasons, it was decided that the office will be forwarded via the head office...

  We also have an IPSEC tunnel running between the head and branch if all we need to the whole running is to get the branch to move towards the hosting via the headquarters company and have been performed.

  It would be like a mesh full, but with one of the deleted links (branch of accommodation), or a hybrid any? BTW both Headquarters and branch run Cisco ASA5550 and 5515 respectively and we have full control over these devices, the hosting company, I'm not sure but maybe an ASA...

  Links to documentation or advice would be greatly appreciated...

  Hello

  Well I don't know how you have configured NAT configuration for traffic between the branch and accommodation.

  It appears from the foregoing that you add is the real network of agencies for headquarters accommodation L2L VPN? If this is true, then need you a NAT configuration in the seat which is between "outside" and "outside". In other words a NAT0 configuration for the "outside" interface. (My suggesting original was to PAT dynamic for the branch if you want to avoid changes of configuration on the hosting Site)

  It would probably be something first of all, I would like to check.

  If it is fine, then I would check the VPN counters

  That both of the L2L VPN connections

  Show crypto ipsec peer his

  This should show you if the L2L VPN has negotiated for networks of branch and hosting on both connections from VPN L2L. It could also tell you if the packets are flowing in both directions.

  If the problem is outside your network then headquarters you would see probably décapsulés/decrypted only packets for VPN L2L headquarters - L2L BOVPN and only encapsulated/encrypted packets for the headquarters - hosting Site

  -Jouni

• Connection spoke to talking DMVPN

  Hello world

  You will need to confirm on DMVPN say if R1 is the hub and R2 and R3 are spoke.

  Need to talk to R3, R2 if it will use PNDH and go via R1 to R3?

  Is it possible that R2 R3 can talk directly using PNDH?

  Concerning

  MAhesh

  You mix a few features here:

  PNDH is used in a DMVPN to save the rays on the hub and give them the opportunity to ask the hub speaks real addresses. With that, PNDH is always between the spokes and the hub. Just see this under the control of the traffic. There is no need to takl speaks to a spoken here.

  When the ray is aware of the public IP address different sticks he wanted him to talk, then the IPSec connection is buid directly between the spokes.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Why key tunnel must be same in DMVPN

  Hello world

  need to understand why key tunnel must be the same between all routers in the DMVPN?

  Thank you

  MAhesh

  Key to tunnel, is how a demultiplexing several GRE tunnels.

  Quoting RFC:

     The Key field contains a four octet number which was inserted by the    encapsulator. The actual method by which this Key is obtained is    beyond the scope of the document. The Key field is intended to be    used for identifying an individual traffic flow within a tunnel. For    example, packets may need to be routed based on context information    not present in the encapsulated data.  The Key field provides this    context and defines a logical traffic flow between encapsulator and    decapsulator.  Packets belonging to a traffic flow are encapsulated    using the same Key value and the decapsulating tunnel endpoint    identifies packets belonging to a traffic flow based on the Key Field    value.

  http://Tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2890

• Ontario Regulation distributes dynamic routes via VPN S2S

  Hi halijenn / experts

  (1) please let me know if IPP works on a Site in tunnel

  (2) I have a behind remote ASA 10.10.1.0 and 10.10.2.0 network that must be distributed to another branch ASA with S2S ASA remote via OSPF

  3) there is an L3 Switch behind the ASA of the branch and Switch L3 there is a router that has a default route pointing router WAN

  Router WAN
  |
  |
  Users-> router-> L3 Switch-> ASA-> Internet-> remote ASA branch (10.10.1.0, 2.0)

  Note: 10.10.1.0 2.0 AND are already configured in the ACL Crypto at the ends.

  Users are able to reach the 10.10.2.X network to the remote end.

  Now for the 10.10.2.0 static routes are already there in the router and the switch finally pointing the ASA branch however as the network grows, it is impossible in the router behind the switch to add static whenever routes (such as the default route to router WAN points). This is why in order to learn routes dynamically, I will add an ospf process to the ASA to branch with the following configuration. Please let me know if iam correct when I add IPP and other OSPF commands to the ASA of the branch. (hope I have nothing to do on ASA remote associated with IPP or OSPF?)

  I take just an example of a remote host 1 10.10.1.4. Inside ASA interface leading to users is 172.16.1.0/24

  access-list redistribute allowed standard host 10.10.1.4 255.255.255.255

  router ospf 1
  network 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
  Journal-adj-changes
  redistribute static subnets redistribute route map

  In addition, I will also be allowing the order for IPP in the encryption of the VPN S2S said card.

  Please help me understand if I'm wrong

  Pls set the OSPF firstly on the SAA process before removing the static routes. Once you have confirmed that the OSPF is configured correctly and the roads are in the OSPF database, then you can delete the static routes. Static routes will always take precedence over OSPF because it has higher metric. Please keep the default route configured on the SAA.

  Hope that confirms it.

• Satellite Pro L300 - 12 H did not get the IP address of the DHCP router via cable

  My Vista Premium SP1 laptop is connected via a wireless connection to a modem/router ADSL Buffalo WBMR-G54 model that works very well. However, I tried the other day to connect the NIC via a RJ45 cable to the router and it won't work! I get the message "limited connectivity" and an IP of 169.254.xxx.xxx that suggests he does not get an IP address from the router.

  I was on various websites and tried all sorts of things as uncheck ipv6 on the properties of LAN card, put off the power of the DHCP Broadcast flag in the registry (according to the number of micrsoft) etc but nothing works.

  Anyone have any suggestions to make it work?
  NB: I took the laptop in work and plugged into the Windows 2003 Server network and got a DHCP IP immediately!

  You asked for help by your Internet provider?

• Communication from router to router via an ISP router

  Nice day

  I have a Setup at home, with that I would like to help.

  I have two routers in my house. One in the living room and the bedroom. The routers are connected to the router of my ISP.

  I would like to communicate between my two routers for the purpose of sharing SMB between my NAS and the NUC Intel running kodi. I am not able to routers link the two and am stuck with the ISP router. If I filled two routers I can share, but I prefer to do (if possible) not in bridge mode. Is it possible to get both routers to talk with each other? I'm a little lost here

  I put the 1900ACS in the lounge to have:

  IP: 192.168.1.1

  LAN DHCP: 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.1.50

  And the EA6400 in the bedroom:

  IP: 192.168.1.51

  LAN DHCP: 192.168.1.52 to 192.168.1.100

  Drawing enclosed with the installation program:

  http://i.imgur.com/WoJ8nW7.PNG

  Hi, @ckZA. Because the router is a NAT firewall, the installation type you want is not possible. The router will block incoming pings outside its own network.

  You rather connect the EA6400 to the WRT1900ACS and the EA6400 value clipping that both computers are connected to the same DHCP. They should be able to discover each other with this configuration.

  I hope this helps.