Tunnel PPPOE ACL between Pix515 and router

Coporate site have Pix515 and remote site router a. I have a configuration of tunnel from a remote location to the office. I am looking for information on ACLs of is to apply to the interface of Dialer to allow ipsec / isakmp and all traffic from Headquarters to the remote site. Would you allow the public address of remote router access with ipsec PIX / traffic isakmp and company's private network address pop3 / smtp and udp.

The PIX with the dynamic address will look like the config of the Tiger and the other PIX will be

resemble the config of Lion.

http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/110/38.html

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

Private of IPSec VPN-private network between ASA and router

Hello community,

This is first time for me to configure IPSec VPN between ASA and router. I have an ASA 5540 at Headquarters and 877 router to EH Branch

Headquarters ASA summary.

Peer IP: 111.111.111.111

Local network: 10.0.0.0

Branch

Peer IP: 123.123.123.123

LAN: 192.168.1.0/24

Please can someone help me set up the vpn.

Hello

This guide covers exactly what you need:

Establishment of ASDM and SDM - http://www.netcraftsmen.net/resources/archived-articles/273.html

Tunnel VPN - ASA to the router configuration:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#ASDM

Kind regards

Jimmy

Problem with IPsec VPN between ASA and router Cisco - ping is not response

Hello

I don't know because the IPsec VPN does not work. This is my setup (IPsec VPN between ASA and R2):

my network topology data:

LAN 1 connect ASA - 1 (inside the LAN)

PC - 10.0.1.3 255.255.255.0 10.0.1.1

ASA - GigabitEthernet 1: 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0

-----------------------------------------------------------------

ASA - 1 Connect (LAN outide) R1

ASA - GigabitEthernet 0: 172.30.1.2 255.255.255.252

R1 - FastEthernet 0/0: 172.30.1.1 255.255.255.252

---------------------------------------------------------------------

R1 R2 to connect

R1 - FastEthernet 0/1: 172.30.2.1 255.255.255.252

R2 - FastEthernet 0/1: 172.30.2.2 255.255.255.252

R2 for lan connection 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------

R2 to connect LAN2

R2 - FastEthernet 0/0: 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0

PC - 10.0.2.3 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.1

ASA configuration:

1 GigabitEthernet interface
nameif inside
security-level 100
IP 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.0
no downtime
interface GigabitEthernet 0
nameif outside
security-level 0
IP 172.30.1.2 255.255.255.252
no downtime
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.30.1.1

------------------------------------------------------------

access-list scope LAN1 to LAN2 ip 10.0.1.0 allow 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0
object obj LAN
subnet 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0
object obj remote network
10.0.2.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
NAT (inside, outside) 1 static source obj-local obj-local destination obj-remote control remote obj non-proxy-arp static

-----------------------------------------------------------
IKEv1 crypto policy 10
preshared authentication
aes encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 3600
Crypto ikev1 allow outside
crypto isakmp identity address

------------------------------------------------------------
tunnel-group 172.30.2.2 type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group 172.30.2.2 ipsec-attributes
IKEv1 pre-shared-key cisco123
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-aes-192 ASA1TS, esp-sha-hmac ikev1

-------------------------------------------------------------
card crypto ASA1VPN 10 is the LAN1 to LAN2 address
card crypto ASA1VPN 10 set peer 172.30.2.2
card crypto ASA1VPN 10 set transform-set ASA1TS ikev1
card crypto ASA1VPN set 10 security-association life seconds 3600
ASA1VPN interface card crypto outside

R2 configuration:

interface fastEthernet 0/0
IP 10.0.2.1 255.255.255.0
no downtime
interface fastEthernet 0/1
IP 172.30.2.2 255.255.255.252
no downtime

-----------------------------------------------------

router RIP
version 2
Network 10.0.2.0
network 172.30.2.0

------------------------------------------------------
access-list 102 permit ahp 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2
access-list 102 permit esp 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2
access-list 102 permit udp host 172.30.1.2 host 172.30.2.2 eq isakmp
interface fastEthernet 0/1
IP access-group 102 to

------------------------------------------------------
crypto ISAKMP policy 110
preshared authentication
aes encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 42300

------------------------------------------------------
ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 172.30.1.2

-----------------------------------------------------
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 128 R2TS

------------------------------------------------------

access-list 101 permit tcp 10.0.2.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255

------------------------------------------------------

R2VPN 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
match address 101
defined by peer 172.30.1.2
PFS Group1 Set
R2TS transformation game
86400 seconds, life of security association set
interface fastEthernet 0/1
card crypto R2VPN

I don't know what the problem

Thank you

If the RIP is not absolutely necessary for you, try adding the default route to R2:

IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.2.1

If you want to use RIP much, add permissions ACL 102:

access-list 102 permit udp any any eq 520

LAN to lan vpn between ASA and router 7200

Hi friends,

I need to configure the lan to lan between ASA vpn (remote location) and router 7200 (on our network).

<7200 router="" (ip="" add:="" 10.10.5.2)="">-(Internet) -<(IP add:="" 192.168.12.2)="" asa(5510)="">---192.135.5.0/24 network

I will have the following configuration:

7200 router:

crypto ISAKMP policy 80

the enc

AUTH pre-shared

Group 1

life 3600

ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 192.168.12.2

Cryto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtrans

map VPNTunnel 80 ipsec-isakmp crypto

defined by peer 192.168.12.2

game of transformation-VPNtrans

match address 110

int fa0/0

IP add 10.10.5.2 255.255.255.192

IP virtual-reassembly

no ip route cache

Speed 100

full duplex

card crypto VPNTunnel

access-list 110 permit ip any 192.135.5.0 0.0.0.255

ASA:

int e0/0

nameif inside

security-level 100

192.135.5.254 Add IP 255.255.255.0

int e0/1

nameif outside

security-level 0

IP add 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.240

access-list ACL extended ip 192.135.5.0 allow 255.255.255.0 any

Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 192.168.12.3 1

"pre-shared key auth" ISAKMP policy 10

ISAKMP policy 10-enc

ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

10 1 ISAKMP policy group

ISAKMP duration strategy of life 10-3600

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtran

card crypto VPN 10 matches the ACL address

card crypto VPN 10 set peer 10.10.5.2

card crypto VPN 10 the transform-set VPNtran value

tunnel-group 10.10.5.2 type ipsec-l2l

IPSec-attributes of type tunnel-group 10.10.5.2

cisco123 pre-shared key

card crypto VPN outside interface

ISAKMP allows outside

dhcpd address 192.135.5.1 - 192.135.5.250 inside

dhcpd dns 172.15.4.5 172.15.4.6

dhcpd wins 172.15.76.5 172.15.74.5

dhcpd lease 14400

dhcpd ping_timeout 500

dhcpd allow inside

Please check the configuration, please correct me if I missed something. I'm in a critical situation at the moment...

Please advise...

Thank you very much...

Where it fails at the present time?

Can you share out of after trying to establish the VPN tunnel:

See the isa scream his

See the ipsec scream his

Please also run the following debug to see where it is a failure:

debugging cry isa

debugging ipsec cry

VPN between ASA and router

Hi all

First of all, I would like to say I'm trying to implement this on Packet trace. I would like to set up a VPN using an ASA 5505 and a Cisco router 1841 (both available on Packet trace).

The devices can ping external IP address on the other.

The problem is that the VPN is not established. If I run sh crypto control its isakmp on the SAA, he said: there are no SAs IKEv1

Configurations for both devices are attached.

No idea why it doesn't work? Sorry if it is not the right forum for this, is the first time I post. I've searched the forums and I checked some of the proposed solutions, but I have not found the answer to my problem :-(

Thanks in advance,

Patty
1. On the router, there is no crypto card. Need in a manner consistent with the SAA.
2. Your policy of phase 1 is not compatible. They settings must match on both sides (router: 3des, ASA: aes)
3. You can adjust your NAT on both devices that tunnel traffic does not get teeth. Remember that NAT is made prior to IPsec. If you do not exempt NAT traffic, then it will not match the ACL crypto more after NAT.
4. Yes, the forum is perfectly fine! ;-)

VPN site-to-site does not not between PIX515e and ASA5505

Hello

I was hoping that someone could help me to get this vpn to work. IPSec tunnels are not and I noticed the error:

August 9, 2011

05:13:26

IP = 39.188.41.188, error during load processing: payload ID: 1

Read on this it seems that this could be a problem of IKE, but I am struggling to find the cause (not helped by the News 8.4 orders).

The configuration is as follows: -.

Head office

PIX515e v6.3 (4)

IP LAN 10.0.160.254/24

Branch

ASA5505 v8.4 (1)

IP LAN 192.168.47.254/24

I have attached the configs - can someone help me with this?

See you soon,.

Huw

Huw,

1. you do not have an ISAKMP policy that corresponds to the remote site (BTW, you do not have a lot of policies of serving, you may want to consider cleaning your config before adding a new policy)

HQ you have this:

part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 20

ISAKMP policy 20 3des encryption

ISAKMP policy 20 md5 hash

20 2 ISAKMP policy group

ISAKMP duration strategy of life 20 86400

You need this on remote sites:

IKEv1 crypto policy xx

preshared authentication

3des encryption

md5 hash

Group 2

life 86400

2. your interesting traffic is not appropriate:

At the remote sites, you must

the DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 object-group network

object-network 10.0.160.0 255.255.255.0

object-network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

access extensive list ip 192.168.47.0 outside_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1 object-group

On the AC:

name 10.0.160.0 ENO_LAN

name 192.168.47.0 EASTMOORS_LAN

outside_cryptomap_20 ENO_LAN 255.255.255.0 ip access list allow EASTMOORS_LAN 255.255.255.0

Need to add this:

inside_outbound_nat0_acl ENO_DMZ 255.255.255.0 ip access list allow EASTMOORS_LAN 255.255.255.0

Once you have applied these changes try to ping through the tunnel. If this still does not please take a show crypto isa's and see the crypto ipsec its on both sites.

Thank you.

Raga

VPN between ASA and cisco router [phase2 question]

Hi all

I have a problem with IPSEC VPN between ASA and cisco router

I think that there is a problem in the phase 2

Can you please guide me where could be the problem.
I suspect questions ACL on the router, but I cannot fix. ACL on the router is specified below

Looking forward for your help

Phase 1 is like that

Cisco_router #sh crypto isakmp his

IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
78.x.x.41 87.x.x.4 QM_IDLE 2006 0 ACTIVE

and ASA

ASA # sh crypto isakmp his

ITS enabled: 1
Generate a new key SA: 0 (a tunnel report Active 1 and 1 to generate a new key during the generate a new key)
Total SA IKE: 1

1 peer IKE: 78.x.x.41
Type: L2L role: initiator
Generate a new key: no State: MM_ACTIVE

Phase 2 on SAA

ASA # sh crypto ipsec his
Interface: Outside
Tag crypto map: Outside_map, seq num: 20, local addr: 87.x.x.4

Outside_cryptomap_20 ip 172.19.209.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 172.
19.194.0 255.255.255.0
local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.209.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.194.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
current_peer: 78.x.x.41

#pkts program: 8813, #pkts encrypt: 8813, #pkts digest: 8813
#pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
#pkts uncompressed: 8813, model of #pkts failed: 0, #pkts Dang failed: 0
#send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0

local crypto endpt. : 87.x.x.4, remote Start crypto. : 78.x.x.41

Path mtu 1500, fresh ipsec generals 58, media, mtu 1500
current outbound SPI: C96393AB

SAS of the esp on arrival:
SPI: 0x3E9D820B (1050509835)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac no
running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel}
slot: 0, id_conn: 7, crypto-card: Outside_map
calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (4275000/3025)
Size IV: 8 bytes
support for replay detection: Y
outgoing esp sas:
SPI: 0xC96393AB (3378746283)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac no
running parameters = {L2L, Tunnel}
slot: 0, id_conn: 7, crypto-card: Outside_map
calendar of his: service life remaining (KB/s) key: (4274994/3023)
Size IV: 8 bytes
support for replay detection: Y

Phase 2 on cisco router

protégé of the vrf: (none)
local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.209.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.194.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
current_peer 87.x.x.4 port 500
LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
#pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
#pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
#pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
#pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

local crypto endpt. : 78.x.x.41, remote Start crypto. : 87.x.x.4
Path mtu 1452, ip mtu 1452, ip mtu BID Dialer0
current outbound SPI: 0x0 (0)

SAS of the esp on arrival:

the arrival ah sas:

SAS of the CFP on arrival:

outgoing esp sas:

outgoing ah sas:

outgoing CFP sas:

protégé of the vrf: (none)
local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.194.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (172.19.209.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
current_peer 87.x.x.4 port 500
LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
#pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
#pkts decaps: 8947, #pkts decrypt: 8947, #pkts check: 8947
compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
#pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
#pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
Errors #send 0, #recv 0 errors

local crypto endpt. : 78.x.x.41, remote Start crypto. : 87.x.x.4
Path mtu 1452, ip mtu 1452, ip mtu BID Dialer0
current outbound SPI: 0x3E9D820B (1050509835)

SAS of the esp on arrival:
SPI: 0xC96393AB (3378746283)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac.
running parameters = {Tunnel}
Conn ID: 29, flow_id: Motorola SEC 1.0:29, card crypto: mycryptomap
calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4393981/1196)
Size IV: 8 bytes
support for replay detection: Y
Status: ACTIVE

the arrival ah sas:

SAS of the CFP on arrival:

outgoing esp sas:
SPI: 0x3E9D820B (1050509835)
transform: esp-3des esp-md5-hmac.
running parameters = {Tunnel}
Conn ID: 30, flow_id: Motorola SEC 1.0:30, card crypto: mycryptomap
calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4394007/1196)
Size IV: 8 bytes
support for replay detection: Y
Status: ACTIVE

outgoing ah sas:

outgoing CFP sas:

VPN configuration is less in cisco router

access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 101 permit ip 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect

access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect
access-list 105 deny ip 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 connect

sheep allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 105

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac mytransformset

mycryptomap 100 ipsec-isakmp crypto map
the value of 87.x.x.4 peer
Set transform-set mytransformset
match address 101

crypto ISAKMP policy 100
BA 3des
md5 hash
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key xxx2011 address 87.x.x.4

Your permit for 105 ACL statement should be down is changed to match because it is the most general ACL.

You currently have:

Extend the 105 IP access list
5 permit ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 (18585 matches)
10 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
30 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
50 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect

It should be:

Extend the 105 IP access list
10 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.206.0 0.0.0.255 connect
30 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.203.0 0.0.0.255 connect
50 deny ip 172.19.194.0 0.0.0.255 172.19.209.0 0.0.0.255 connect

IP 172.19.194.0 allow 60 0.0.0.255 (18585 matches)

To remove it and add it to the bottom:

105 extended IP access list

not 5

IP 172.19.194.0 allow 60 0.0.0.255 any

Then ' delete ip nat trans. "

and it should work now.

Site to Site between ASA VPN connection and router 2800

I'm trying to get a L2L VPN working between a ASA code 8.4 and a 2800 on 12.4.

I first saw the following errors in the debug logs on the side of the ASA:

Error message % PIX | ASA-6-713219: KEY-GAIN message queues to deal with when
ITS P1 is complete.

I see the following on the end of 2800:

ISAKMP: (0): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 157
ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is NAT - T v3
ISAKMP: (0): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 69
ISAKMP (0): provider ID is NAT - T RFC 3947
ISAKMP: (0): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (0): treatment of frag vendor id IKE payload
ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled
ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM1

ISAKMP: (0): built NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID
ISAKMP: (0): send package to x.x.x.x my_port 500 peer_po0 (R) MM_SA_SETUP
ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM2

ISAKMP (0): packet received from x.x.x.x dport 500 sports global (R)

MM_SA_SETUP
ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM2 = IKE_R_MM3

ISAKMP: (0): processing KE payload. Message ID = 0
ISAKMP: (0): processing NONCE payload. Message ID = 0
ISAKMP: (0): found peer pre-shared key x.x.x.x corresponding
ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (2345): provider ID is the unit
ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (2345): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 54
ISAKMP: (2345): provider ID is XAUTH
ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (2345): addressing another box of IOS!
ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
ISAKMP: (2345): vendor ID seems the unit/DPD but hash mismatch
ISAKMP: receives the payload type 20
ISAKMP (2345): sound not hash no match - this node outside NAT
ISAKMP: receives the payload type 20
ISAKMP (2345): no NAT found for oneself or peer
ISAKMP: (2345): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
ISAKMP: (2345): former State = new State IKE_R_MM3 = IKE_R_MM3

ISAKMP: (2345): sending package x.x.x.x my_port Exchange 500 500 (R)

MM_KEY_EXCH

----------

This is part of the configuration of the ASA:

network of the ABCD object
10.20.30.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

network of the ABCD-Net object
172.16.10.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

cry-map-77-ip object-group XXXX object abc-site_Network allowed extended access list

access list abc-site extended permitted ip object-group XXXX object abc-site_Network

ip access list of abc-site allowed extended object abc-site_Network object-group XXXX-60

NAT (any, any) static source 20 XXXX XXXX-20 destination static abc-site_Network abc-site_Network

NAT (any, any) static source 20 XXXX XXXX-20 destination static abc-site_Network abc-site_Network

XXXX-20

object-group network XXXX-20
ABCD-Net network object
object-abcd-Int-Net Group

XXXX_127

object-group network XXXX-20
ABCD-Net network object
object-abcd-Int-Net Group

ip access list of abc-site allowed extended object abc-site_Network object-group XXXX-60

Crypto card off-map-44 11 match address cry-map-77
card crypto out-map-44 11 counterpart set 62.73.52.xxx
card crypto out-map-44 11 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

cry-map-77-ip object-group XXXX object abc-site_Network allowed extended access list

Crypto card off-map-44 11 match address cry-map-77
card crypto out-map-44 11 counterpart set 62.73.52.xxx
card crypto out-map-44 11 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

card crypto out-map-44 11 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA ikev1

object-group network XXXX
ABCD-Net network object
object-abcd-Int-Net Group

------------------------

Here is a part of the 2800:

!
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
ISAKMP crypto key r2374923 address 72.15.21.xxx
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
!
card crypto cry-map-1 1 ipsec-isakmp
the value of 72.15.21.xxx peer
game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
match address VPN
!
type of class-card inspect match class-map-vpn
game group-access 100
type of class-card inspect cm-inspect-1 correspondence
group-access name inside-out game
type of class-card inspect correspondence cm-inspect-2
match the name of group-access outside
!
!
type of policy-card inspect policy-map-inspect
class type inspect cm-inspect-1
inspect
class class by default
drop

type of policy-card inspect policy-map-inspect-2
class type inspect class-map-vpn
inspect
class type inspect cm-inspect-2
class class by default
drop
!

!
interface FastEthernet0
IP address 74.25.89.xxx 255.255.255.252
NAT outside IP
IP virtual-reassembly
security of the outside Member area
automatic duplex
automatic speed
crypto cry-card-1 card
!
interface FastEthernet1
no ip address
Shutdown
automatic duplex
automatic speed
!
IP nat inside source overload map route route-map-1 interface FastEthernet0
!
IP access-list extended inside-out
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any
IP nat - acl extended access list
deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 0.0.255.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
refuse the 10.10.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255
refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
allow an ip
outside extended IP access list
allow an ip
list of IP - VPN access scope
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255
IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
IP 10.200.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255 ip permit 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
ip licensing 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 23 allow 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 23 allow 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 23 allow 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 note category class-map-LCA-4 = 0
access-list 123 allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 0.0.255.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
!
!
!

!
route-map-1 allowed route map 1
match the IP nat - acl
!

Hello

I quickly browsed your config and I could notice is

your game of transformation (iskamp) on SAA and router are not the same, try to configure the same on both sides.

in the statement of the ASA NAT you gave (any, any) try to give the name of the interface instead of a whole.

Conflict of IPSec between IPSec and business VPN tunnels

I crushed a 2821 current c2800nm-adventerprisek9 - mz.124 - 22.YB8 at home with 2 gre IPSec tunnels for personal use, and my office will be held that a customer based IPSec VPN to connect to the corporate VPN. My problem is that when I want to connect to the corporate VPN, I see packages being encrypted and sent, but I would have never received the return packets. It seems that the IPSec VPN tunnels with IPSec from my office and router packages conflict trying to decrypt and gives this error. (I removed the public addresses for anonymity)

CRYPTO-4-RECVD_PKT_INV_SPI: decaps: rec would be package IPSEC a bad spi to destaddr = "myaddress", prot = 50, spi = 0xDB32344E (3677500494), port = "corpvpn".

When I remove the card encryption off-side WAN router, my Office VPN works immediately. I can change the configuration, either on the side of the IPSec GRE tunnels, but has no way for me to change any configuration on the corporate VPN. Does anyone know of a workaround on the cisco router? I can provide the running configs or view orders.

The 2821 also performs NAT overload for internet access.

Hello, Reed.

1. try to remove the interface crypto map and add "protection... profile ipsec tunnel." "to your VTI:

Crypto ipsec IPSEC profile

solid Set trans

int g0/0

No crypto map card

int tu1

Ipsec IPSEC protection tunnel profile

int tu2

Ipsec IPSEC protection tunnel profile

2. try to force your corpVPN to use encapsulation UDP instead of ESP.

NSX HOL 1603 - OSPF stuck in EchangeStart/DR between 2 WDM router perimeter and vpod

Router OSPF between 1 WDM with Edg2 and vpod, neighbor in the uplink network neighboring OSPF has not established between Edg2 and vpod the router it is stuck in EchangeStart/DR

It is resolved it was a matter of mtu I increase the mtu size on the perimeter 2 GDE at 1600, the neighbouring ship comes up to and Full

PIX515 & dynamic routing

Central office:

LAN - 10.20.0.0 255.255.255.0

PIX 515 - int branches - branches (through the cloud of MPLS VPN)

internal int - LAN

int outdoors - WAN

Branch:

LAN - 10.20.16.0.255.255.255.0

C1760 - int s0/0 - Central officr (through the cloud of MPLS VPN)

PIX501 - int outdoors - WAN

internal int - LAN

The PIX515, I had a static route to the path to service-

Route of the branches 10.20.16.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.16.1 1

I want up VPN channel between PIX501 (int outside) of the Executive Board and the Central PIX515(int outside).

To do this, I created card crypto to PIX515 and ACL:

outside_crypto_map_10 ip 10.20.0.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 10.20.16.0 255.255.255.0

card crypto 10 TEST matches the address outside_crypto_map_10

Here my question: I want to remove static route of PIX515 and use dynamic routing, but I hesitated because I have ACLs for VPN, where branch destination LAN (and will serve as an int on the outside) and dynamic road that shows the way to the domestic LAN through branches int PIX515. How this will be live together? And what will be used first - road or ACL?

The PIX can run RIP and OSPF today, but not those of a VPN. If you want to learn routes dynamically through the VPN you can do that, so you need to use static routes instead. Looks like you might be interested by the DMVPN function in IOS routers.

Routing, regarding all the traffic that you want to use a VPN must first be routed on an interface that has the appropriate encryption card applied, then if this traffic matches an ACL encryption card it will be encrypted and sent to the corresponding VPN peer. That's to say routing goes first for the outbound VPN traffic, then encryption. No matter if channels are static or learned dynamically, except, as I mentioned above, you can now run a routing through a VPN Protocol in the PIX.

Does that help?

Problem with VPN compatibility between 2811 and 2911

Hello

I would ask anyone had problems with the implementation of a VPN tunnel between 2811 and 2911?

The IPSec VPN is established, but for some reason, I cannot ping the side LAN across LAN to the other end of the VPN router?

All experience would be highly appreciated

Thank you

IPSec VPN can be smoothly between routers cisco (and not nesesserely cisco) set up, so there should be no problem in your case.

If you say that this tunnel is established successfully, then the problem most likely related to routing problems between sites or incorrect configured crypto-acl. Check if the hosts located on both sites have correct routing information on how to get to subnets on the other site.

Make more accurate assumptions, it would be helpful that you provide config on both sites and describe your topology.

VPN between ASA and 871

Hello

I'm setting up a VPN router between 871 and ASA 5505 for the first time and having a problem. I have attached my network diagram as well as the configuration of 871 and ASA. Although the VPN tunnel is coming for example sh crypto isakmp his watch QM_IDLE and Exchange ipsec SA is successuful as well, but none of the machine can access each other. Please help as I am in desperate need to operate.

Thank you all,.

Jérôme

Hello

It seems that you are missing some required configuration. See the link below...

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805e8c80.shtml

HTH

MS

* Rate of useful messages *.

Delay between angle and entered analog on a 6221

Hello

my test setup consists of a (8184 current run LabVIEW RT) embedded PXI controller which uses a PXI-6221 of data acquisition. One of the outputs analog of the 6221 creates a demand for speed that is sent to a servo controller. the servo drives then the test configuration. Between the servo and the remaining test configuration, a quadrature encoder is located. Both the 6221 meters are used to measure the position of the servo (using the trains of pulses A and B) as well as the speed of the servo (frequency of A pulse train). In addition to these counter inputs, some analog inputs of the 6221 serve as well to recored the configuration of test signals.

In this configuration, one of the analog signal has a frequency of n periods per revolution of servo (determined by the mechanical design of the test facility). But when I leave the servo turn to for example 100 rpm, then decelerate from status quo with a constant deceleration and then draw the analog signal against the measured angle, I see clearly that as long as the speed is telling, I n periods per turn (or a passage from my analog AC to zero each 1/2n towers); However, as soon as the slowdown begins, the plot gets stretched along the axis of the angle (so the plot tells me there are less than n analog periods per turn, which is impossible because it would require the mechanical destruction of the facility).
However, I can calculate a position based on speed information signal, as I got to the second counter (by integration of the speed). When I do this for the above velocity profile and draw the analog signal against the calculated angle, I see exactly n times / revolution, no matter how fast the installation program is rotating (just the expected behavior).

So, apparently, the speed measured is "in phase" with analog signals, while the measured angle has a "phase error. Draw the angles measured and calculated against the time tells me the same thing: the measured angle is always late (compared to the calculated angle). The period is not constant throughout the measurement; I've seen values between 30 and 170 ms within a single record. Due to this change of variable, inserting a delay for all channels, but the angle is not a great idea.

Unfortunately, calculation of the position of the speed signal is no option for me, because the direction of rotation is changed during measurement; because speed information I have based simply on a frequency of pulse train, it contains no information management, therefore a calculated position would be unaware of the changes of direction.

Does anyone have an idea whence thios delay and what I can do to fix this problem?
Try a position different methods of decoding or exchanging the meter channels has not made a difference.

Thank you!

Hey Kevin,

attached you will find the last block diagram (no new translation this time, since no changes have been made that require a), which includes your last suggestions (explicitly start the task of AI, remove the excess constraints) with a flat sequence structure that applies all the preparations of task to finish before the start of the first task (I know I could have achieved the same effect of intelligent routing of the signal error, but I think the code is) better readable this way).

Without OPI, LabVIEW tends to start to have, ao and tasks of the angle of the very different moments, which (for some reason that I don't understand - we have a sample clock based calendar here, and the sample clock is run, well after the three mentioned tasks...) tends to cause delays in the order of several 10-100 ms between tasks. With the structure, this problem is eliminated.

The Sub - VI just above DAQmx writing contains the "conduct" code that I used in the last screen shot to "serialize" the requested speeds - in this way, the table that contains the requirements of speed does not need to be rebuilt.

The code that creates a weather channel frequency implicitly timed measure left the VI shown here in a second VI that is running on the host computer, because everything that involves a calculation and does not require any intzeraction with the DAQ hardware is better placed there (the 850 MHz on the PXI controller celeton is slower than 2 definitiely something host GHz Dual-Core system).

The behavior you mentioned for the task "not started" HERE is what wrote using LabVIEW. I thought the block of relaxation that I had at the beginning would treat the start of the task - at least, the code like this figure repeatedly in the examples that come with LabVIEW.

I don't really understand what has caused the problems I've had - it seems that it was the combination of the measure quickly loop iteration with the start of task based on trigger HERE, but I do not understand what are the mechanisms in the background caused the problem (too forced loop was not the cause; the same block diagram works well with an additional loop timer).

If the solution was composed of the following steps:

-remove the old code calculating speed, replace it with a better code out of the main loop. This allows to

-reduce considerably the frequency of the main loop.

-Pull the DAQmx writing out of the loop, and

s ' ensure that all tasks are started explicitly just before the main loop starts to run.

-Possibly remove excess constraints of the main loop.

Can not scan wireless between mac and photosmart 7515

Print very well between Mac and a printer wireless

Can scan correctly when CONNECTED between Mac and a printer

Have already uninstalled and reinstalled the software

Message says function 'Enable Scan to Computer' if she goes on to say that with Mac users, it is automatically activated.

Mac OS 10.7

Hello

Adding the printer using the Protocol IP Jetdirect (tab within the intellectual property) only will allow you to print.

To scan, Mac must communicate with the device as a Hello. The multicast must be supported by the router.

https://discussions.Apple.com/message/13184615#13184615

As you can see in bellows Joey post, it seems that the router Actiontec M1000 support not Hello.

The user said it was confirmed by the manufacturing of router and a firmware update will be available.

However, any update firmware seems to be available:

http://www.Actiontec.com/support/product_details.php?PID=38&Typ=all

I recommend you contact support Actiontec to check all supported multicast router.

Kind regards

Shlomi

Tunnel PPPOE ACL between Pix515 and router

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for