Two instances of the same access point in Windows TAsk Mgr - both unresponsive.

Similar Questions

• If I have two modems in the same office... windows xp can combine two connections at higher speed dial... my question is can I do the same thing for the dsl if I have two lan cards?

  If I have two modems in the same office... windows xp can combine two connections at higher speed dial... my question is can I do the same thing for the dsl if I have two lan cards?

  Hi cliffwho

  You can fill with connections to the LAN. However I recommend you read this first to understand what it is that you do. I hope this helps.
  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb457038.aspx

• Firefox does not work for multiple instances of the SAME user account on Windows Multipoint Server 2011

  We have a PC HP of MulitSeat MS6200
  It runs Microsoft Windows MultiPoint Server 2011 (which seems to be a twisted version of Windows 7)
  It is implemented in a laboratory of computer science and students connect you using their account for shared room - IE multiple instances of the same user accounts are currently running on the PC at the same time.
  The first student to run Firefox can work with it without a problem.
  However, when another student try to start firefox they get the following message:
  Firefox is already running but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system.

  Cannot start Firefox using a profile that is already used by someone else.
  Each Firefox instance needs its own profile or you will get this error message.

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Using_multiple_profiles_-_Firefox
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Bypassing_the_Profile_Manager

  Use-no.-line switch remote control to open another instance of Firefox with its own profile and to different instances of Firefox running concurrently.

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Opening_a_new_instance_of_Firefox_with_another_profile

• LEAP and EAP-FAST in the same access point

  Hello...

  We have an infrastructure based on 1142 APs.  Now, they have set up an SSID with JUMP as an authentication mechanism.

  The infrastructure is not a wireless LAN controller, access points are configured as standalone APs with SSID configured in each of them.

  The mechanism to authenticate the windows with JUMP positions was a little tricky.  We need now to migrate all stations to EAP-FAST, but without loss of JUMP environment during the migration.   You have to configure the APs to serve the two authentication mechanism: LEAP and EAP-FAST.

  Is it possible to have it?

  What should we do about it?

  Thanks in advance...

  For autonomous APs. If you are using:

  Authentication open EAP protocol

  Network EAP-

  It accepts virtually all EAP types, not depends on the radius server to have all active... for example EAP methods, if you are using ACS may the PEAP LEAP EAP-FAST, EAP - TLS at the sametime...

  So no matter what, the customer's server and the RADIUS wireless must match the EAP type configured... any type of EAP, the AP should support it...

• How can I have two instances of the same open page to separate tabs?

  New 4.0.1 on a Win7 machine - last week using. It happens in time I want to open the same page twice. In the case of today, it's because I need to fill out a form and the need to look at a previous version - filled - in the same form that opens with the same URL. I've done this before, on the old machine with the next recent FF and Win XP.

  Thank you and I love Firefox!

  You can middle - click reload on the side of the right end of the address bar to open the same page in a new tab.

  • Switch to no more Tab: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/switch-to-tab-no-more/

• Can VMware Player run multiple instances of the same VM?

  I looked around but could find an answer to this question. If it has already been answered, please feel free to point me to that answer. I am relatively new to VMware Player, so this may seem like a stupid question. Please bear with me.

  I've been running Linux in a virtual machine using VMware Player 5.0.2 on Win7 and I would like to start another instance of the same virtual machine, simultaneously. When I try to launch the image once again, VMware asks if I want to take possession of the virtual machine running, but does not give the opportunity to start another instance.

  Is it because it is not possible to run two instances of the same VM, or y at - it another way to get there?

  Welcome to the community,

  This can be done. If another instance would be allowed to use the same file system, the guest operating system would be very likely corrupt the file system. What is possible - at least with VMware Workstation - is to create clones related, where the Basic virtual disk is the same (open in read-only mode), but writes go to independent virtual disk files.

  André

• How to call a second instance of the same VI?

  Hello

  I have a useful VI dealing with IO operations. To save some time, of what I would call the VI as a second instance do work at the same time. I created a sequence sub with the run option 'Use the new thread' and I called the Vi (a step of the sequence only). Execution time of the VI is about 20 seconds run Durin I called the subsequence and I carried on running my main sequence (parent). Since then 10 seconds to launch the subsequence (in the thread of sepatate I called the same VI as in the thought of subsequence the second instance will be created. However, instead of parallel work of the two instances of the same VI had to wait when mt subsequence end known call the VI th.

  So my question is, as in the topic: how to call a second instance of the VI even at the "same time"?

  Could you please tell me about the best approach to solve the problem?

  Any VI that you want to run in parallel must be paid also re-entrant, including screws.

• Open program of the two facades of the same type of v.i

  I would like to know if it is possible to open by program of the two facades of the the same type of v.i, but with activity on a front panel without impact on the activity on the other side... for example, the way that you would open two windows of a chrome for example of browser.. .thank you

  Want to open two instances of the same VI?  It's simple.  Just do the reentrant VI.

• Trigger two FPGA instances at the same time

  I have a basic FPGA code that transmits the bits of data on a serial (RS-485) bus, the code is written so that it expects in the first State of a machine to States in a single-cycle timed loop.  After a certain trigger, he begins to read a FIFO containing data and sends the data on a line of Tx.  It does this until all bits are send and then it goes back to the first State to wait for the next trigger.  The relaxation is necessary because windows must fill out first before the FPGA FIFO can start sending.

  I need two instances of this code runs, because I have two buses of com (one is redundant).  So I use the FPGA code as a Subvi and I wrote a main FPGA vi to call two separate instances of the Subvi in parallel.  A regular window vi wrote on the FIFO for bed FIFO for Rx and Tx.  No problems so far.

  The thing is I start two transmissions in 200nS of each other (Yes, nanoseconds).  Windows will write two FIFO in parallel, but the timing is 4uS apart, too long.  I tried implementing a Boolean flag in the Subvi FPGA, but windows can not write directly on the control of Subvi.  FPGA won't allow (the Write function is grayed out).  I tried to use a FIFO for a flag, but the problem is a race condition.  One of the instances is first read FIFO and he destroy.  The other can't read.  I need a common trigger point to be used by the two instances of Subvi.

  My final solution was to use a memory in the Subvi FPGA and digital control in the main FPGA vi.  Windows write in numerical order, it may because the control is in the main FPGA vi.  Inside the main FPGA, I run a timed loop that looks for digital to be zero.  If so, it writes the value into the location of the memory used by the Subvi FPGA.  After awhile, the principal wrote a zero back to memory to prevent the Subvi is restarted, as well as to write a zero for digital to reset.  This repeats, waiting for windows to write in digital again for the next transmission.

  I had to do it this way because sometimes I want to pass on the bus, and sometimes just one or the other.  Numeric values are used to determine which to pass on.  Now, the transmissions are starting to almost exactly at the same time, 1 or 2 nanoseconds apart.  But the trigger process seems very silly to me.  I was wondering if there is a better solution.  I'm pretty new to FPGA.

  tbob wrote:

  Basically, I did the same thing using FPGA memory.  Windows I am writing for a digital control that resides inside the main FPGA vi.  In the main FPGA, I write in the memory.  Inside the Subvi FPGA, I read the brief and decode the value to use either one or the other or both buses.  After fool with it for awhile, because reading Memeory needs to use a shift register (probably because it takes a whole cycle of clock), I had to work.  The two bus trigger at the same time.  I guess it's not really important if I use a FIFO or if I use the memory.  The main problem is that I write Windows at the hand of FPGA, then the hand of FPGA for the Subvi FPGA.  Then the time is right for what is the Subvi is.

  There are some advantages to the use of two FIFO on your approach.  First of all, you don't have the change of register for the memory location.  Secondly, we should not worry that VI is responsible for compensation to the memory location, or do, you run the risk that one of your subVIs run twice, or not at all, if the memory is not erased at the right time.  Perhaps most important, you'll save yourself space on the FPGA because you will not need arbitration - the additional code that is added when two parts of the FPGA try to access the same resource at the same time.  In your case, both instances of the Subvi access the memory block at the same time, so the FPGA compiler adds additional logic to avoid conflict.  If only read you the memory block in one place and just write it in one place (reading and writing can be different loops where subVIs) there is no need for arbitration.  Using two FIFOs, you can keep independent and avoid the conflict resolution code.  See the help for the "arbitration" for more details.

• dblink to an instance on the same server

  Suppose I have two Oracle instances that sit on the same physical server. In one case, I create one dblink to another and this dblink allows to define a view as select * from sometable@dblink. Will there be of the type involved in the trafficking network restrictions (for example limited to the current network interface physical bandwidth as 100 Mbps, 1 Gbps) causing overhead tiny as these instances be on separate physical machines? In other words, is this dblink between instances the right way to go, or maybe there is possibility to enjoy a few additional mechanisms for these two instances provided the fastest way possible (and assuming that created the view above)?

  Thank you

  If the two instances are on the same server, LAN drivers/software can resolve the IP address of the connected 'server' as the local host, so he won't need to go out on the network (if possible, why not try unplugging the network cable from the server and see if it works again - assuming, of course, the network is not necessary for the duration).   The connection will pass through the network interface on the same server and communicate via the relevant port that the instance is configured on.

  This isn't really any different to having an instance of database installed on a computer not connected to the network that you connect then on this same computer by using any client interface, it will be always access it through the port on which the database is listening, but there is no need for any network physical to exist.

  As separate bodies, then using dblink is probably the method appropriate and common use.

• Two Dynadocks on Mac - VGA two displays at the same time?

  I have two Dynadocks: PA3542EY1PRP and PA3541EY1PRP.

  They are connected to the iMac 21 'Snow Leopard'.
  All USB ports work but I can't run that two VGA displays simultaneously.

  If one works, the other doesn't.
  Display links drivers are updated.
  There must be a conflict.

  Any help is appreciated.
  Thank you very much.

  Hmm I'm not really sure if the system can access two external graphics chips Dynadock Mr. the fact is that you need to install the Dynadock software and my knowledge, it not have access two GPUs at the same time.

• 15 n series Pavilion: Pavilion 15 computer n097sa laptop. L and R audio that passes through the two speakers at the same time.

  Hi, so basically, I just upgraded to this laptop 15 n097sa (new to me) of my old sucks, and it's so much better.
  Only, I just noticed that when his left or right is out at the same time the two speakers. I noticed you access with your headphones. the left certainly comes out the left a little more and the right thus respectively, but they always come out of two speakers much.
  To clarify that, the only left channel is coming from the two speakers at the same time, instead of just the left speaker. And similarly for the right channel.
  I only did a real test on youtube videos of stereo test, even I tested it on my old acer before, that came out of the correct speakers.
  I have a sound dts, no matter who is and it could be reduced to just change the settings, but I don't think that's it.
  Does anyone else have or had this problem too?
  I know I'm a sucker for pc, but please go steady on me, your.
  Win pro 8.1.

  will you please and thank you very much indeed, couch.

  Malygris1 wrote:

  Hi there @SofaQueue

  Welcome to the Forums of HP Support! It's a good place to find the help you need, so many other users, the HP experts and other members of the support staff.

  I understand that you are having problems with the audio balance on your laptop, and I am happy to help you with this. First of all, I would say reinstall the audio driver.

  ETC.

  Let me know if you still have problems and view the details of what happens.

  I will mark it as resolved now. Very useful, thanks.
  What I found was the following: I have really no problem at all, it was the parameters of the audio DTS after all.
  Simply turn off the audio improvements and testing showed once again that's all it was.
  

  Thanks again though, nice to see people are willing to help so much!

  Edit: Is PS it OK to mark my answer as a solution? I don't care if or whatnot, it just is the right answer and makes sense. I'll do it if he lets me.

• Avoid to get two theards at the same time

  Hello

  I was wondering how to avoid to run two threads at the same time in teststand. When I using teststand, I found it can run two threads in simultaneity.for example, I can open a file sequence, using single-pass enter point to run a theard, when this theard is not finished, I use single-pass or TestUUTs enter point to run other theard. I want to avoid this case. Is there settings, we can get motor teststand to tell me a thread is running or not?

  Thank you!

  You write a custom user interface? If you use an application Manager (all the example user interfaces and the sequence editor to do), you can see:

  ApplicationManager.Executions.Count > 0

  If you use just the engine that you can keep the number of executions by increment your account upon receipt of the UIMsg_StartExecution UIMessage and reduce your number when UIMsg_EndExecution is received.

  If instead you want to determine the number of executions of a sequence running, you can use RunState.Engine.GetInternalOption () to get a reference to the Application Manager (at least of the UIS and the sequence editor that use an Application Manager) and then do the following ActiveX to get the Executions.Count property.

  Hope this helps,

  -Doug

• Two users on the same PC. How to run the application even for two users at the same time?

  Hello friends,

  I have two user accounts on my pc. Is it possible to run the same application (for example: DEFRAG or disc cleanup utlities) for two users at the same time? I mean, these utlilities work by all of the computer or user account? That would mean the same application to perform for a single user in the background and foreground to the user, or I'm totally lost in space?

  Thank you for your comments

  You should run Disk Cleanup in each user account. Do not try to shut it down or change user when defragmentation; system files may be damaged. You must stop the defragmentation, log off, restart the defragmentation and don't really no point for it. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Windows 7 PCs are not connected to the closest access point

  Windows 7 PCs are not connected to the nearest access point.  Any ideas?

  For example:

  We have AP 1 and 2 of the AP for exaple.  They have the same SSID.  AP 2 is further with a bad signal.  AP 1 is closest with an excellent signal.  Why my laptop does not connect to the AP 1?

  You MUST use the same SSID.  I think that you misread my post.

  And Yes, a channel problem is that what I have proposed.  You can try to configure access points using the 3 discrete channels (1, 6 and 11) to minimize any overlapping units to the same channel coverage.
  At least this is the traditional way, we do it, although the automatic selection increases common and 11n 40 Mhz channels (if defined in this way) are also in.