Ugly anti aliasing in Fireworks CS3

Similar Questions

• Static text not anti-aliasing in CS3/AS3

  I imported Helvetica Roman 55 (FTT) in my library, point 14 and called it f-Body Text *. I have all three types of text boxes: static, dynamic, and input. The font size varies from 18 to 14 (most is 14). Anti aliasing is set to "readability." Everything is perfect in the authoring environment. At time of execution that the dynamic and input text seems perfect, but all static text is put in correspondence of the bits.
  
  I tried to adjust the custom anti-alias and used extreme smoothing, text is blurred, as expected in the environment, but bit mapped in the SWF creation.
  
  I tried Arial instead of Helvetica, same results.
  
  I tried to change the static text to dynamic and integrated the characters required only, this has solved the problem and may be a possible work around.
  
  Anyone know what is happening?
  

  Applied CD

  > Must refer to as much as I know all the static text
  > the symbol of the police.

  The problem is only the dynamic text fields support the outlines of fonts embedded.
  If my hunch is that your static text fields are doing the best they can with
  they are given. Note, for example, that the character button incorporation
  (in the property inspector) goes away when you change a text field to
  public static.

  > I? ve already taken the lead and change all my static text
  > dynamic, integrating specific glyphs required, deactivation
  > the? selectable? and by setting the multiline property
  > as required.

  Yes, that would do, but try to change a return to the static and point
  He the real police rather than the symbol of the police. Static text fields
  stir in automatically, and it is much easier to maintain in this respect.

  David Stiller
  Adobe Community Expert
  Dev blog, http://www.quip.net/blog/
  "Luck is the residue of good design."

• Weird * stretching * text anti-aliased in the Textbox

  I use Flash 8 (actually with CS3 but all recording mode Flash 8 and use AS2.) I'm also kind of new to the present).
  I have a button that loads a dynamic text in a text box using this actionscript:
  
  on (release) {}
  loadText = new LoadVars();
  loadText.load ("sometext.txt");
  loadText.onLoad = {function (success)}
  If (success) {}
  trace (Success);
  _root. TextBox.outsideFilename.htmlText = this.externaltext;
  }
  };
  }
  
  Loads of everything very well - EXCEPT when I choose "Anti-alias for readability" (and use a non-standard font and integrate some character sets) all the text in the text box out elongated vertically - it comes out looking stretched for some reason any. Is this a normal behavior? Looks terrible and not what I want. If I don't choose to be the choice of "Smoothing", while proportions are correct them all, but not anti-aliasees of course. What I'm missing here? I would like to think proportionally correct anti-aliasing of text.

  If you size your textbox (Note: change the width and height in the Panel properties scales your textbox, unfortunately) then the text content will be stretched.

  However, scalability text works on embedded characters. This is why the scale appears only when you choose to incorporate characters. To resolve this problem:

  (1) remove any scaling of the text box. To do this, select your text and use the panel(Window > Transform) transformation to set the width and height to 100%

  (2) resize your textbox using arrow tool or the type tool.

• Anti-Aliasing when free rotation

  Is it possible to disable it? I have FW MX 2004.

  Well, the problem is that you're dealing with a bitmap image. "Anti-aliasing" only applies to the actual drawing process when you're dealing with a bitmap image. After he is fired, it is just a bunch of pixels on the canvas. During the transformation of the bitmap image, you deal with these pixels of resampling interpolation. You have two options:

  (1) change the mode to interpolation for "nearest neighbor". This option can be found in your Preferences dialog box. This will avoid any softening (what you call anti-aliasing) that you rotate, but I doubt it will look like all good after a rotation.

  (2) use vector paths, with 1px hard stokes (like pencil > 1px hard). It is much more flexible, because not only you will be able to rotate and fireworks will be "repaint" the race for you, so you will have no problem of interpolation, but you will also be able to change this path in the future, or even, at any time, change the run options. Try the vector path tool (found under the pen tool) to get free race like the pencil tool, only drawing with the live vectors.

• Why Firefox is made of fonts while stairs and blocks, w/no anti-aliasing?

  FF 29.01 under Windows 7. You can see the image below the link to compare how browsers should make the fonts and how my browser actually renders the police. It is not a question of magnification. I have already installed the Anti-Aliasing Tuner extension. I added the layout.paint_rects_separately boolean as well.

  http://i.imgur.com/6kdcFok.PNG

  Seems to me that ClearType is disabled.
  http://www.thewindowsclub.com/disable-font-smoothing-Windows

  This only applies to Firefox? If yes you switch to another font in Firefox settings?

• Example of signals with a filter anti-aliasing

  I use PCI-6259 6221 PCI and USB 6221 cards in different configurations. As I understand it, is that the anti-aliasing filter on all of these cards is fixed to pass to the frequencies of 1 MHz. If I'm a signal from a RG58U BNC cable that is supposed to contain higher frequency of 1 kHz sampling, but there is noise of high frequency present there. A sampling of the signal to 2 kHz would be enough to acquire the signal correctly, or these high frequencies would affect the components of low frequency on sampling?

  I read about too much sampling that allows you to use digital filters (I'm guessing that software filter can be used) If you sample the data at a higher rate. You should always use the anti-aliasing filter, but the required parameters are more relaxed. Would this work in my case? The anti-aliasing filter on my cards has a very high bandwidth, so I don't know how much I need to do to acquire the signal correctly oversampling. Is there an equation?

  Also, if the analog inputs for data acquisition cards are generated by a filter (for example when recording ECG or EEG) which allows you to specify a bandwidth frequency, I still need a filter anti-aliasing? Would be the distance between the amplifier and the DAQ card much a difference when it comes to the generation of noise on the cable?

  In general, I try just to see if my current collection method at the rate of Nyquish with the maps I have is good or not. I just save the data without even using any digital filtering (software).

  That's right - if you go down to 10kS/s then the temporal resolution and minimum pulse detection would 100us.  If it is a just sampling rate or not depends on your requirements for the accuracy of timing and jitter.  In other words, if it's OK that your pulse Detection could could delay until 100us then a 10kS/s sampling frequency should be OK.

• Filter low pass analog (anti-aliasing filter) external to the NI USB 6251 housing

  Hello everyone!

  -I m trying to acquire an analog signal of tension (high frequency content) using a connected to an edge NI USB-6251 BNC-2110. I learned in this Labview Forum that NI USB-6251 has no analog low-pass filter programmable (or anti-aliasing filter), so that I can't help but jitter when scanning my signals. For my application, the cutoff frequency of the analog low-pass filter must be equal to 100 kHz or MORE (maximum of 500 kHz). A possible solution to solve my problem, would be to work with an external analog low-pass filter before you scan the voltage signal. Based on this I'd like to know:

  (1) national Instruments develops analog external filters? I need a filter which also has one output, analog, so that I could send also the low-pass analog filter filtered signal to my NI USB-6251 box to scan correctly it!

  (2) what model of external low pass filter would be compatible with the NI USB-6251 housing?

  Any help would be much appreciated!

  Best regards!

  Hello

  all high resolution of the M series (628 x) cards are equipped with a filter low pass which can be enabled or disabled programmatically. For the anti-aliasing filter feature, examine the boards of National Instruments DSA (dynamic signals Acquisition) acoustic and vibration measurement
  currently the NOR 9221, 9225, 9227, 9229, 9233, 9234, 9235, 9236, 9239 and 9237 C Series modules feature anti-aliasing filters. These modules are intended for the high accuracy measures for which anti-aliasing filters are a necessity.

  Houssam Kassri

  OR Germany

• cRIO thanks the Module NI 9237 bridge in the Interface of scanning and Anti-Aliasing

  Hello

  I have questions about the use of a Module NI 9237 bridge with CRIO and its use in Scan Interface mode. The manual speaks the data rate of the module, and a (n) parameter that can be set to adjust (to a minimum of 1613 Hz) which in turn puts across the module built in anti-aliasing filters. It seems (but not explicitly stated) that this data rate setting is available FPGA programming mode.

  Our application is currently running in mode Scan Interface, so my question is what is 'throughput' module (and therefore anti-aliasing filters) mode Scan Interface? And, if we have the analysis period the value 10msec (100 Hz), y at - it no filtering of the anti-aliasiing of software provided automatically by scanning interface itself related to the period of scanning? Or all the anti-aliasing extra something that we must build within ourselves? I looked at the example provided with Scan Interface and there is nothing more.

  I don't understand about anti-aliasing, just need to clarify what is happening for this specific module mode Scan Interface.

  Thank you

  Andy

  Hi Andy,.

  I had to have a quick sleep on this night to get my facts right, hope that the delay was too long!

  The minimum data listed in the 1613 samples/s are due to a forumla that uses the internal time base that is fairly well explained on page 20 of the Manual. The sweep period did not affect the rate of data, or to activate the anti-aliasing filter. My previous post was wrong in that sense, apologies!

  This page helps explain mode of scanning pretty well too, but the best way to explain it is that even if the frequency of the module can be attached to 1613 samples/s or higher, the compactRIO will collect only 1,000 of these samples a second, or in your case if you are using a rate of 10ms loop, 100 of these samples of 1613. The anti-aliasing cut will be based on 1613 x 0.45 as you said and so will be 725Hz (not based on the rate of loop as I mentioned incorrectly)

  In this case with these modules it is probably a good idea not to use a period of scanning slower than 1 msec for the reason you said - if you're worried about oversampling you can always you decimate readings in the software afterwards to take each readings from 1 to 10 (this page explains how do with an eerily similar situation!)

• The anti-aliasing filter selection

  Deal Sir

  I want to choose the anti-aliasing filter. I data collection in real time of current through NI Mseries 6281 DAQ probe. My sampling rate is 8 kHz and Total number of samples 40 k. What is the value of the frequency, should I choose for the anti-aliasing filter?

  Deep eyes

  Automata

  Yes. That should be fine.

  Lynn

• Anti-Aliasing feature in graph does not always, but inexplicably...

  I noticed a strange bug of Aliasing in the graphical indicator in my labview 2014

  I have attached a file that has two supposedly identical graphics but on my PC (windows 7, i-3 dual core, 8 GB Ram) charts two different display modes.

  The one labeled "aliasing problem" is jagged when anti-aliasing is turned on and when is broken. The other table behaves as I expect and I'm used to.

  (1) - does anyone see this difference as I do?

  (2) can someone explain the reason for this phenomenon?

  much obliged for any comment

  Thank you

  I see the same thing:

  

  There seems to be a bug specifically with the graph of scan (with the line). Power off the line, updates work fine. Also, turning aliasing seems then redraw the map with the correct folding (you can see that at Midway through the data on the first plot). You could try periodically calling the method "Force redraw' to see if that makes aliasing to update. It seems also set when you stop the VI.

  Weird bug since it is only on one of the graphics.

  (Also... What is with all the local variables and signalling of the value? (And the weird to leave timeout?)

• Full Screen anti-aliasing

  Well, today I have a question about disabling Full Screen anti-aliasing.  I installed Windows 7 on my Windows Vista OS in October when Windows 7 is released in stores.  I had a few games installed on my PC before upgrade me to Windows 7, but since I tried to install any game on my PC now that it works on Windows 7, the game will not play either or he advises me to disable the Full Screen anti-aliasing to play the games that I install.  The thing is, I don't know where to go to turn off Full Screen anti-aliasing.  I hope that it is in fact the resolution to resolve this issue.  Otherwise I won't be able to play the games that I like on my PC. Help me with this problem please.

  Hello

  You can check this link:

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/WPF/thread/1ad9a62a-d1a4-4ca2-A950-3b7bf5240de5/

  As a work-around to try to reduce accerelation of hardware on the computer and check.

  Here are a few steps to try following these steps and check:

  1. right click on the desktop and click on personalize.
  2. click display settings, and then click Advanced settings.
  3. click on the Troubleshooting tab, and then click on change settings.
  4 move the notches on both hardware acceleration slider to the left.
  5. click OK and then click Restart now.
  6. once the computer has restarted, test the game.

  It will be useful.

• anti-aliasing using the 9233

  
  

  Hi Jeff,

  The first thing that you should start with is a guide to the delta sigma converter:

  It is the ADC that is used on the 9233. The delta sigma converter has a built-in inherent anti-aliasing filter. If you look at the dynamic features section of 9233 operating manual it will show you some of the features of this filter. The filter is a digital and the bandwidth and the stopband are calculated according to the sampling rate, you specify the 9233. If you give a sampling frequency of 50 kHz,-3 dB attenuation point bandwidth will be 50 k * 0.45 = 22.5 kHz. If all the components below 22.5 kHz will be kept completely and everything above that will be alleviated. This ensures that you will get no aliasing.

  If you apply a 20 kHz filter after that you'll still good data because the threshold for the anti-aliasing filter is greater than the maximum sampling frequency (50 kHz).

  Please let me know if this clarifies this question a little better.

• How to set the Anti Aliasing in Blackberry Storm?

  I m drawing in a bitmap as...

  bitmap[i] = new Bitmap(60, 60);
  Graphics g = new Graphics(bitmap[i]);
  g.setColor(Color.BLACK);
  g.drawLine(....);
  

  Now how to put Anti-Aliasing on before g.drawLine ()?

  Try again with the addition of this before drawline:

  g.setDrawingStyle(Graphics.DRAWSTYLE_AALINES, true);
  

  Concerning

  Bika

• Counter-strike 1.6 sort of turn vsync & anti aliasing (OFF)

  Hey...
  I want to ask something is possible to turn vsync & anti aliasing (OFF) for counter strike 1.6 permanently?
  I want to say I have that now to go to nvidia Control Panel and turn off vsync & anti aliasing and applt and the game counter strike, but I'm just sick it whenever I play counter strike I first turn off vsync & anti aliasing in the Panel of nvidia and when and then put them on the backs... .is threr somehow turn off vsync off & anti-aliasing to couynter strike permanently? No matter what software or something, I can use to control the vsync & anti aliasing for counter strike? and one more thing is there a software that can help me to launch counter strike on poor quality?

  Hello

  You can ask your question on the link mentioned below using:
  
  http://store.steampowered.com/forums/

• Windows 8 and anti-aliasing of fonts

  Hello!

  This is my first post in the Microsoft community.
  I'm a big fan of this company, and that I usually use their products in my studies, work, mail... etc.
  I've used Windows since XP, and I'm very happy with the last windows8.
  Windows 8 is much more fluid and more "BOLD", I love it!
  There's only one small problem, but it's really important me: font smoothing.
  I started using Ubuntu lately in my brother's laptop, and I was completely impressed by the display of fonts on it.
  It seems bigger, more professional and more :-)
  The police is 'acceptable' on windows only when it is greater than 50px.
  I see an evolution on this way on IE for ie9, but it certainly not the same as Ubuntu
  Can they take this thinking in mind when working with blue windows, or they will ignore it and continue with the fonts as 15years ago...

  Hello!

  I would like to offer a way to adjust your font smoothing.  To account for many types of LCD monitors and different types of pixels, Windows has adjustments to the police of smoothing method it uses.  It is possible that an optimal method of inferiority is currently used.  Here is how to adjust it:
  1. Open your startup screen and type the word "clear" (search results appear when you start typing).
  2. Select the category of settings on the right, then click on the result of research called "adjust ClearType text' to start the ClearType text.
  3. Click next in the wizard and then step through the calibration.  At each stage, you will be asked to click on the text that is best for you.  This will allow Windows to use better anti-aliasing of fonts for your system and your preference.