Unable to deliver - maximum number of hops exceeded

Similar Questions

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded

  All respected DBAs,

  Today I faced an issue. I found below statement alertlog file and when I tried to connect to the base of this error came on the command line.

  "ORA-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded 150.

  Then I restarted my Oracle Service, connected to the database and questioned

  select * from v$ resource_limit and found this result.

  Process

  CURRENT_UTILIZATION = 52

  MAX_UTILIZATION = 61

  INITIAL_ALLOCATION = 150

  LIMIT_VALUE = 150

  Sessions

  CURRENT_UTILIZATION = 53

  MAX_UTILIZATION = 60

  INITIAL_ALLOCATION = 248

  LIMIT_VALUE = 248

  If my process is exceeded then why MAX_UTILIZATION = 61 only? Please, help me to understand this.

  This view is dynamic (it will reset on reboot) and restart you the database.

  So you can only say that after the restart of the database the number of processes is already 61.

  -------------

  Sybrand Bakker

  Senior Oracle DBA

• Windows 7 disk management utility does not allow for creating simple volume: maximum number of partitions exceeded error

  I am trying to create a new partition in Win7 using the disk management utility. Shrank lecteurC existing to create unallocated space. Am not able to create a simple volume with this space unallocated due to the following error message.

  "You cannot create a new volume in this unallocated space because the disk already contains the maximum number of partitions".

  How to fix this or go around with another method to create partitions?

  Hello

  You will need to convert the dynamic disk before creating the extra partition. To do this in disk management:

  -Right-click the disk 0 (gray area) which indicates the total size of your hard drive

  -Select 'convert to dynamic disk.

  Once you have converted to dynamic disk, you will be able to go and create the new simple partition.

  I hope this helps.

  Best regards, Damian

  Damian Coverly

• Contribute admin error: maximum number of users exceeded site

  We had a mixture of Contribute 3, 4 and the new CS3 with contribute Publishing Server 1.1, login via LDAP to our environment Active Directory, which we ran more than a year. We suddenly encountered a strange series of problems. Almost all user input in the Administration page been marked with a red line - as they would be if - last updated an error "user not in the directory" even if it's 1) are in AD 2) we can check the accounts in the SPC Panel and 3) they can log in and edit their pages very well. Suddenly, the red lines went away, but when we try to add new users, we get the message "User site exceeded limit". That should be impossible because we bought 250 licenses of Contribute and CPS, and we added only 100 users so far. The only things that have changed are recently 1) we have added a new ad server and 2) we have improved our admin users with CS3 so that everybody turns always 3.11 or 4. Any ideas?

  To work around this limitation, you can change the ckm.xml file to override the default value of 200.
  * You must save this file before running these steps.* *.

  Stop CPS via the services console by typing services.msc in the run as... window.
  Select Macromedia Contribute Publishing Server, then click on stop.
  Navigate to contribute publishing Server\jrun4\servers\contribute-wps\contribute\WEB-INF\config\ and select the ckm.xml file
  Open the ckm.xml in a Notepad Editor.
  Change the value between the two tags to all number you want 200
  Save the changes
  Restart the server.

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes 2000 exceeded

  Hi all

  In our dataguard environment, even if the number of database backup process was 2000 (wide enough), we get the error as below.

  Treat m000 presentation failed with error = 20

  M001 submission process failed with error = 20

  Treat m002 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m003 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m004 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m003 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m002 presentation failed with error = 20

  M001 submission process failed with error = 20

  Treat m000 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m005 presentation failed with error = 20

  Treat m000 presentation failed with error = 20

  M001 submission process failed with error = 20

  ORA-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded 2000.

  Errors ORA-20 will not be written to the log of alert for the next minute. Please see the trace files to see all the errors ORA-20.

  Currently, the listener is down and there is no log shipping/apply. After the restart it was working fine. But even now if we check the number of processes, it is now to increase every 10 minutes.

  Initially, the number of processes has been 1000.as we had the same error we has increased by 2000. But still, we are facing this problem.

  Kindly advice on that.

  dbconsole is configured separately for the primary and standby.  You could stop it on the day before.

  Check what is the intention that works on standby mode.  The DBA intend to use it to monitor the database pending?

  Unlike enterprise manager that maintains a centralized repository, database control (dbconsole) maintains the repository in the same database that is monitored.  So it might be tempting * writing * to the database.

  Hemant K Collette

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (1000) exceeded.

  Dear team,

  After interruption of the Application processes have increased and he hit ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (1000) exceeded.

  Now that we have increased the value of 1000 to 1200 process issue is resolved.

  It is this ora-00020: maximum number of processes exceeded 1000, out of this database this query on the view V$ SESSION and V$ PROCESS show different results.

  We know that there is a running application and the connection to the database. The connection to the database is a failure.

  How can I know which user & terminal is spawning these processes database server-side? What is the best way to identify the source/machine customer associated to these processes?

  but only 70 sessions show in v$ and gv$ session? In v$ process 687, used slots show the unknown terminal and program of the unknown, as a zombie process. With this information, I can't find what is the appeal of the database, and burn all my processes.

  Example:

  SQL > Select count (*) from v$ session;

  COUNT (*)

  ----------

  70

  SQL > select count (*) in process of v$.

  COUNT (*)

  ----------

  687

  I want to know the source Client Terminal Server/spawning these processes (LOCAL = NO).

  75B - XYZ] - oracle-> ps - ef | grep XYZ

  Oracle 25934 1 0 Sep 16?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 20220 1 0 09:57:37?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 22968 1 0 Sep 13?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 23436 1 0 Sep 20?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 21448 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 7216 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 10760 1 0 Sep 16?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 8385 1 0 Sep 16?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 22952 1 0 Sep 17?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 10911 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 14401 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 6685 1 0 Sep 19?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 7434 1 0 09:11:44?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 13560 1 0 09:17:57?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 7928 1 0 Sep 13?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 3623 1 0 Sep 10?           0:54 ora_qmnc_XYZ

  Oracle 29210 1 0 Sep 13?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 13431 1 0 Sep 17?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 21495 1 0 Sep 16?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 13567 1 0 09:17:58?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 4782 1 0 09:42:40?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 25398 1 0 Sep 16?           0:00 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Oracle 21958 1 0 Sep 19?           0:01 oracleXYZ (LOCAL = NO)

  Thanks in advance!

  Krish

  V$ PROCESS captures no USERNAME and MACHINE (because the user has not been authenticated on the database server).

  I would look through the listener.log file to identify the remote control (ie. application server) IP addresses.

  You can set the listener.log as an external Table file and interrogate him.  (Listener.log and external table on google search, there are several ways)

  Hemant K Collette

• ORA-00018. Exceed the maximum number of sessions

  Hi all
  
  I have a windows Server 2003, oracle 10g release 2.
  connection of 300 users competitor.
  
  My SESSIONS parameter = 800
  My PROCESS parameter = 723.
  
  After 2 or 3 days, I got the following message when I try to connect.
  
  ORA-00018. Maximum number of sessions to exceed.
  
  even I have restart my server, I got this number sometimes.
  
  What is the problem? I'm really in a very bad situation, users can not connected.
  
  Thank you

  Please post output commands below:

  Select the value of the parameter $ v where name = "sessions";
  Select count (*) in the session of v$.
  Select * from v$ resource_limit;

  If you see the 3rd command output as equal values in all the columns then its correct and Oracle returned ORA-00018.

  Then, V$ SESSION is fake! It does not report all sessions really in use. If you look in V$ SESSION see text (with the help of V$ FIXED_VIEW_DEFINITION), you will see that V$ SESSION reports of the sessions USER and only BACKGROUND.

  But there is a 3rd type of session - a RECURSIVE session, which is used for recursive calls data dictionary as explained above. V$ SESSION does not display these.

  So what is the moral of this story?

  Oracle uses recursive sessions for recursive data dictionary operations
  These sessions are also taken from the array of objects in session state controlled by the session setting
  V$ SESSION shows no recursive sessions, but V$ RESOURCE_LIMIT told it the truth about the use of the session state object table
  If you hit the error ORA-00018, and then expand your table of parameters of sessions or configure your application to use fewer connections or sessions

  Note that Oracle 11.2 changed the automatic calculation of parameters of sessions and large number of session state objects is attributed to a number of default process.

  Source: http://tech.e2sn.com/oracle/oracle-internals-and-architecture/recursive-sessions-and-ora-00018-maximum-number-of-sessions-exceeded

  Concerning
  Girish Sharma

• Number of hops in a Gigabit Ethernet topology

  Hello

  I need to connect in series a number of switches through links GigabitEthernet (not Gigastack).

  This is - someone has feedback on the maximum number of hops we can wreath?

  Thanks in advance...

  If you don't want to say 'Cluster' feature, it depends on your covering tree configuration. Usually with 802.1 d (or 802. 1 q/d - PVSTP) you can't have more than 7 switches. Otherwise, you may have problems in some cases (it depends, in the p2p links, it is not so true). With 802.1W or 802. 1s, you can have up to 40 switches (Cisco 802. 1 s/BPMH, it is best to use only in closed companies, if not all wastewater with root different bridges will be blocked). Without STP (with string), you have without any limitation

• SmartView: OLAP _error (1020011): Maximum number of lines [65000] exceeded

  My client is unable to load lines in Smartview AdHoc, they receive the following error message
  
  OLAP _error (1020011): Maximum number of lines [65000] exceeded
  
  Excel version: 2007
  SmartView release: 11.1.1.3
  APS 11.1.1.3
  Essbase 11.1.1.3
  
  Essbase.Properties file was below the parameter / value:
  service.olap.dataQuery.grid.maxRows = 1000000
  
  Essbase.cfg file was below the parameter / value:
  SSPROCROWLIMIT 500000
  
  In the service Console Regional vendor of servers-> right click the server-> settings-> properties-> tab-> maximum number of text box lines - 65000
  
  Please suggest what to increase to solve this problem?
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  ~ KK

  The number in the Regional service console must match the value in the service.olap.dataQuery.grid.maxRows parameter. Probably you have edited the file essbase.properties evil.

  At this point, I would like to change the setting in environmental assessments to the desired limit or 0 for unlimited and then restart APS.

• CS6 "Unable to set a maximum number of files to open." YET.

  CS6 "Unable to set a maximum number of files to open." Just got the whole production and everything installed on my Mac, everything works fine to illustrator who only works very well on one not at all on the other. I tried everything I found on the forums here to my knowledge and without success. I just spent 2 hours on call on hold with adobe support and no one picked up. Extremely frustrated, any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Hey eldriario-

  I just fell on it myself. I ran this doc to help adobe (link below) shell script once, quit Illustrator, repaired permissions, rebooted and was then able to start normally.

  Mind you, I would not the least bit surprised if the error returns again tomorrow, but for now it seems to work.

  Good luck and hope this helps.

  http://helpx.Adobe.com/Illustrator/KB/unable-set-maximum-number-files1.html

• Why my icloud unable to connect, he wrote "the maximum number of free account has been enabled on this phone" why? I already reset my iphone and create a new id

  Why my new id icloud unable to connect? He wrote "the maximum number of free account we enabled on this phone, while I already reset my iphone.

  A device can create only three accounts iCloud, after which still attempts to bring the message you see. This is related to the material and there is no way around it - reset makes no difference. What you can do is to create a new account iCloud on another Mac or iOS (not Windows) device, then you can sign in on your phone.

• Get a Virus message "the maximum number of secrets that may be stored in a single system has been exceeded.

  How to remove "the maximum number of secrets that may be stored in a single system has been exceeded?

  Download and run malwarebytes... see if that helps

  www.Malwarebytes.org

• Windows Explorer crashes and get this error in the event log: maximum number of ATI EEU session has been exceeded

  Windows Explorer crashes and it is what I have in my event log. Can anyone help?

  Exceeded maximum number of ATI EEU session

  Hi TodFranklin,

  1. when exactly you receive this error message?

  2 did you do changes on the computer before the show?

  Follow the suggestions below for a possible solution:

  Method 1:

  Step 1: Start in safe mode and check if the problem persists.

  Start your computer in safe mode

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/start-your-computer-in-safe-mode

   

  Step 2: If the problem does not occur in safe mode, you can put your system to boot (in normal mode) to solve the problem.

   

  How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

   

  Note: After troubleshooting, be sure to configure the computer to start as usual as mentioned in step 7 provided in the above article.

  Method 2: I also suggest that you scan your computer with the Microsoft Security Scanner, which would help us to get rid of viruses, spyware and other malicious software.

  The Microsoft Security Scanner is a downloadable security tool for free which allows analysis at the application and helps remove viruses, spyware and other malware. It works with your current antivirus software.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

   

  Note: The Microsoft Safety Scanner ends 10 days after being downloaded. To restart a scan with the latest definitions of anti-malware, download and run the Microsoft Safety Scanner again.

  Important: During the scan of the hard drive if bad sectors are found, the scanner tries to repair this sector, all available on which data may be lost.

  Let us know if that helps.

• ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (150) exceeded

  Hello

  I'm getting ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (150) exceeded. I can not connect as sys. I killed all the oracle user processes but could not connect. Pls advice me on this.

  Rgds,

  AthuruMithuru.

  Hello

  try to connect with a - prelim

  prelim sqlplus / as sysdba

• error ora-00036 maximum number of levels of sql recursive (50) exceeded

  I have a trigger of the declaration on the LEVELS table, I want to update COMPONENTS field when another field is changed in TIERS, in order to avoid the calculations, I used to ch line shutter COMPONENTS to complete a package, but I get this error ora-00036 maximum number of recursive sql exceeded (50)

  It's my trigger:

  create or replace trigger DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS

    after update on tiers 

   

    I INT ;

   

    FOR I IN (PKG_TIERS. TAB. FIRST)... (PKG_TIERS. TAB. Last) LOOP

  UPDATE to levels

  PUT REFERENCE_EXTERNE = "YYYY"

  WHERE LEVELS = PKG_TIERS. TAB (I). I_TIERS;

    END LOOP;

  end DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS;

  
  

  This is ma for each trigger line:

  create or replace trigger DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS_E

  after Update FOR CODE_TYPE_TIERS on LEVELS

    for each row

  V_CPT INTEGER ;

    IF : NEW. CODE_TYPE_TIERS IS NOT NULL THEN

  IF PKG_TIERS. TAB. LAST IS NULL THEN

  PKG_TIERS. TAB(1). I_TIERS: =: NEW. BLEACHERS;

  PKG_TIERS. TAB(1). CODE_TYPE_TIERS: =: NEW. CODE_TYPE_TIERS;

     ELSE

  V_CPT: = PKG_TIERS. TAB. LAST + 1;

     END IF;

    END IF;

  end DBTRGA_UPD_TIERS_E;

  Clearly, you have past of recursion.  After updating the table of LEVELS, then a statement trigger level (after update) as the fires that updates the table LEVELS... which will cause then itself to once again fire... which will cause himself to fire once again... which will cause itself to the light again... etc etc.

  If it is a business logic that should be implemented, so you don't want to include it as a trigger, you want to just have a code in a package that updates the table once.

  If it were me, I would scrap two triggers in this case.  Have a trigger is fired for each row updated (in SQL) which has then cross to the PL/SQL package for details of this update line, means you to act so the context switching between SQL and PL/SQL for each update line, which will affect the performance of the updates.

  Explain what you're actually trying to do (business logic), with a few examples and data tables and we might be able to propose a better approach, which is not abusing triggers in this way.