Unflattening table FXP gives incorrect results

Similar Questions

• Count (*) using partitioned index gives incorrect results

  I have a table partitioned by hash with 4 index the.

  Table name: store_assortment

  clues the: idx1 (master_id), idx2 (store), idx3 (item), idx4 (request_id)

  When I run this query result is 13649:

  SELECT COUNT (*)

  OF store_assortment

  WHERE to store = 6010

  ORDER BY point;

  When I run this query result is 13648:

  SELECT COUNT (*)

  OF store_assortment

  WHERE store = 6010;

  I rebuild all indexes, but the results are the same. Can anyone point to a bug or something that can explain this?

  I dropped and recreated the indices and values are correct now. Reconstruction did not work.

  Thanks for all the help.

• sdo_cs. Transform gives incorrect results...

  Hi all
  
  I try to convert the projection Ordnance Survey coordinates WGS84, British National Grid. When the conversion comes out all points are approximately 100 metres west northwest. The native srid is 81989 (BGSO) and I am trying to convert 8307 or 4326, all two wgs84 lat/long and give the same results.
  
  Is it possible the problem lies in the conversion between a Cartesian and spherical coordinate system?
  
  Here is the code:
  
  Select sdo_cs.transform (SDO_GEOMETRY (2001, 81989, SDO_POINT (367597, 80975, NULL), NULL, NULL), 8307) twice;
  
  which translates into:
  
  MDSYS. SDO_GEOMETRY (2001,8307, MDSYS. SDO_POINT_TYPE(-2.45816262176897,50.6276801063492,null), NULL, null)
  
  However, the returned coordinates must be:
  
  -2.45950270 / / 50.62750125
  
  All comments appreciated! Thank you.

  Yes, 10g did not have reference parameters required in the definition.

  If you're on 10 gr 2 (for example, 10.2.0.4), you can update your SRID, with the following script (if you're on 10gR 1, please let me know, first of all).

  (You can change the WKTEXT back the same way, if you cut and paste the current value of WKTEXT into a text backup file). Usually, we do not suggest to change the existing definitions, but rather to create new variants of these definitions. In this case, however, you simply change the definition of 10g in the definition of 11g, which is fine.

  SQL> update
    sdo_cs_srs
  set
    wktext =
  'PROJCS["British National Grid",
    GEOGCS [ "Ordnance Survey Great Brit",
      DATUM ["Ordnance Survey Great Brit",
        SPHEROID ["Airy 1830", 6377563.396, 299.3249646], 375, -111,  431, 0, 0, 0, 1],
      PRIMEM [ "Greenwich", 0.000000 ],
      UNIT ["Decimal Degree", 0.01745329251994330]],
    PROJECTION ["Transverse Mercator"],
    PARAMETER ["Scale_Factor", 0.9996012717],
    PARAMETER ["Central_Meridian", -2.000000],
    PARAMETER ["Latitude_Of_Origin", 49.000000],
    PARAMETER ["False_Easting", 400000.000000],
    PARAMETER ["False_Northing", -100000.000000],
    UNIT ["Meter", 1.000000000000]]'
  where
    srid = 81989;
  
  1 row updated.
  
  SQL> commit;
  
  Commit complete.
  
  SQL> select sdo_cs.transform(SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 81989, SDO_POINT_TYPE(367597, 80975, NULL), NULL, NULL), 8307) fr
  om dual;
  
  SDO_CS.TRANSFORM(SDO_GEOMETRY(2001,81989,SDO_POINT_TYPE(367597,80975,NULL),NULL,
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  SDO_GEOMETRY(2001, 8307, SDO_POINT_TYPE(-2.4595026, 50.6275011, NULL), NULL, NUL
  L)
  

  It works for you?

• LEFTOUTER join querry which gives bad result

  Hello

  I have tables like below.when I perform a left outer join issue IDs and startdate he gives invalid results.when I write in request

  It does not correct result because there is no data for 16 jan. It should give no results. But it shows all records. How do I solve this problem

  SQL:

  Select a.id, a.date, b.val, a.tot, b.net, b.cre

  FROM table1 a

  join table2 b left

  "on a.id = b.id and a.date = b. and a.date ='02-Feb-2014."

  In the tables below contains no data for the month of February but still im getting the incorrect data. He must not returnany files right?

  Table1:

  ID	Date	Val	tot
  1	January 1, 13	1	9
  2	2 January 13	3	8
  3	3 January 13	4	7
  4	January 4, 13	5	6
  5	5 January 13	6	5

  Table2:

  ID	Date	NET	CRE
  1	January 1, 13	1	9
  2	13 January 13	3	8
  3	3 January 13	4	7
  4	January 4, 13	5	6
  5	5 January 13	6	5

  "It should not returnany files right?

  Wrong, there is no where clause so it should return all the records in a padded with NULL values for b.

• Text index CONTEXT Oracle which gives bad results!

  Expert Oracle Text,
  
  I'm on Oracle 11.2.0.2 on Solaris 10 and have implemented the Oracle text features using the CONTEXT index type, and I'm getting a few problems in. I have a need for research with joker as % and giving the wrong exit. Here's the scenario where I get incorrect results:

   
  
  --creating preferences etc 
  exec   ctxsys.ctx_ddl.create_preference ('cust_lexer', 'BASIC_LEXER'); 
  exec   ctxsys.ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('cust_lexer', 'base_letter', 'YES'); -- removes diacritics 
  exec   ctxsys.ctx_ddl.create_preference ('cust_wl', 'BASIC_WORDLIST') 
  exec   ctxsys.ctx_ddl.set_attribute ;    ('cust_wl', 'SUBSTRING_INDEX', 'true'); 
  
  --table set up 
  CREATE TABLE TEST_USER 
  ( 
    FULL_NAME  VARCHAR2(64 CHAR)                  NOT NULL, 
    LAST_NAME  VARCHAR2(64 CHAR)                  NOT NULL 
  ); 
  
  
  CREATE INDEX TEST_USER_IDX5 ON TEST_USER 
  (FULL_NAME) 
  INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT 
  PARAMETERS('LEXER cust_lexer WORDLIST cust_wl SYNC (ON COMMIT)'); 
  
  --data set up 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('Supervisor upervisor', 'upervisor'); 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('JOSEPH WILSON', 'WILSON'); 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('CHRISTOPHER Phil', 'TAYLOR'); 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('PAUL HERNANDEZ', 'HERNANDEZ'); 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('Betty Jipes', 'Jones'); 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('One Anna', 'Anna'); 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('Three Anna', 'Anna'); 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('Two Anna', 'Anna'); 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('Four Anna', 'Anna'); 
  Insert into TEST_USER 
     (FULL_NAME, LAST_NAME) 
  Values 
     ('Gary Barrow', 'Barrow'); 
  COMMIT; 
  
  --query using CONTAINS which gives WRONG output - because out intention is to return only those strings that START WITH the letter P but it returns another string that has P not at the starting!! 
  
  SQL> select full_name from test_user where contains(full_name,'P%')>0; 
  
  FULL_NAME 
  ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
  PAUL HERNANDEZ 
  CHRISTOPHER Phil 
  
  -- I need output as follows in which the second value is not returned...meaning 'CHRISTOPHER Phil' should NOT be returned by the CONTAINS clause just as the LIKE operator below doesn't return it. 
  SQL> select full_name from test_user where full_name like 'P%'; 
  
  FULL_NAME 
  ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
  PAUL HERNANDEZ 

  Please can anyone suggest what to do about it?
  
  Thank you
  OrauserN

  No, you can skip all those, if you use SUBSTRING_INDEX.

• OBIEE 11 g: get incorrect results when you browse detailed report summary.

  Hello

  I get incorrect results when you browse detailed report summary.

  Please find the attached document, I have gives step by step with screen shots.

  Please let me the problem and the solution.

  Kind regards

  Srinivas.

  1. What are you going through the link of action, only pass you the values (between 61 and 65) and Total, are

  If so that the parameter value will not restrict your report in detail, try filterout gender and age (between 61 and 65) group through action link.

  2 Total, to filter only the sex,

  Concerning

  Rajagopal.

• Add Colume in the table and display the result in it.

  Hi guru,.
  I have a requirement to add the column to the existing Table. and display the result after calculation.
  
  
  Thank you
  Rutu

  Hello

  Please use this referral code snippet:

  Am = (OAApplicationModule) pageContext.getApplicationModule (webBean) OAApplicationModule;
  OAViewObject vo = (OAViewObject) am.findViewObject (""); Give VO name attached to the region of the Table.
  If (vo! = null)
  {
  vo.addDynamicAttribute (""); Addition of ViewAttribute to VO
  }
  VO. Reset();
  VO. Next();

  Do the math you want to

  Definition of the calculated value in the created attribute of VO
  vo.getCurrentRow () .setAttribute ("", );

  I hope that gives you a proper help.
  Please do not hesitate to ask if more Question

  --
  Thank you
  Shrikant

• Incorrect results of SDO_GEOM. Relate()

  Hi all
  
  I get incorrect results of calls to SDO_GEOM.relate / SDO_RELATE / SDO_INSIDE etc., apparently because they cannot handle the values of Longitude both positive and negative in the same query.
  
  The request goes in the direction of

  SELECT COUNTRY,
   SDO_GEOM.relate(SCOTT.ASIA.GEOLOC, 'DETERMINE', < A Transient Geometry>, '0.005') from SCOTT.ASIA;

  Where SCOTT.ASIA is a layer containing a geometry for each Asian countries (although I experienced the same behavior with other, more simple polygons)
  And transitional geometry is defined:

  MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(
              2003,
              8307,
              null,
              MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003, 1),
              MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-1.2,   89.9,   6.6,  -16.2,  170.3,  -21.1,  168.25,  89.9,  -1.2,  89.9))

  This query gives me:

  Malaysia     DISJOINT
  Maldives     DISJOINT
  Mongolia     DISJOINT
  Myanmar     DISJOINT
  ...etc

  When all these geometries have to resolve on the INSIDE.
  I traced this issue to the fact that there is a selected point with a negative longitude (-1.2, 89.9), which should be perfectly fine. If I change of (1,2, 89.9):
  I get:

  Malaysia     INSIDE
  Maldives     INSIDE
  Mongolia     INSIDE
  Myanmar     INSIDE
  ...etc

  This occurs regardless of what point is outside the hemisphere for example:

  ...  MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-1.2,   89.9,   6.6,  -16.2,  170.3,  -21.1,  168.25,  89.9,  -1.2,  89.9)...
  ...  MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(1.2,   89.9,   6.6,  -16.2,  170.3,  -21.1,  *191.75*,  89.9,  1.2,  89.9)...
  ...  MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(1.2,   89.9,   6.6,  -16.2,  170.3,  -21.1,  *-168.25*,  89.9,  1.2,  89.9)...

  Note that the second and third entries represent a limit to the East that surrounds the Western hemisphere. None of these definitions provide good results when using SDO_GEOM.relate
  
  Is there a way to make sure that spatial queries returning correct results with geometries that envelop this way?
  
  Thank you

  This type of query "whole earth" does not work as you did. See http://download.oracle.com/docs/html/B14255_01/sdo_cs_concepts.htm#i891851
  >
  The following size limits apply, with geodetic data
  No polygon element can have an area larger than half of the surface of the Earth.
  Online, the distance between two adjacent coordinates cannot be greater or equal to half of the perimeter (a great circle) of the Earth.

  If you need to work with larger items, first break these elements into several smaller components and work with them. For example, you cannot create a geometry that represents the entire surface of the Earth; However, you can create several geometries, each representative of the global ocean surface. To work with a line string that is greater than or equal to half of the perimeter of the land, you can add one or more points on the line so that all adjacent coordinates are less than half of the perimeter of the land.
  >

  Search this forum for "Earth." for example
  Re: Simple Transformation work not as expected
  the whole earth MBR GEODESIC

• Satellite L10 and keyboard:-shift key gives wrong results

  Using the SHIFT key with most of other than a-z keys gives bad result.
  I tried to re - install a driver via Control Panel / keyboard with the Toshiba XP Home CD inserted but not better driver is found.
  Control Panel / regional and language setting is English UK

  Hello, Alan

  It will be nice if you can give us more information. What specific keyboard of the country you have? What you want to do exactly? Give us a few examples please.

• Please explain CVI question #335358: using the operator of bit-shift twice on the same line of code produces incorrect results

  Hello

  I just stumbled on http://www.ni.com/white-paper/12323/en#335358_by_Category.

  With the help of the bit-shift operator twice on the same line of code produces incorrect results.
  Workaround: Separate the operations of shift of two bits in two distinct lines of code.

  Reported Version: 9.0

  Solved Version: N/A

  Added the: 14/02/2012

  Could someone please explain what kind of construction causes such a question?

  I have not noticed problems again and not have not noticed or found a thread about it.

  Thank you.

  The reported scenario looks like this:

  unsigned int a = 1, b = 62;
  unsigned  long long result = 1ULL << a << b;
  

  The problem arises because of the temporary variable used when do two little is placed in the same line. This separation into two lines will produce correct results:

  unsigned int a = 1, b = 62;
  unsigned  long long result = 1ULL << a;
  result = result << b;
  

• ASCIISTR function that gives different results

  Hi Experts,
  
  I use the function ASCIISTR and it gives different results in SQLPLUS and TOAD
  
  SQLPLUS
  

  SQL> SELECT ASCIISTR('é') UC FROM DUAL
    2  ;
  
  UC
  -----
  \201A
  
  SQL> SELECT ASCIISTR('ú') UC FROM DUAL;
  
  UC
  -----
  \00A3

  TOAD
  

  SELECT ASCIISTR('ú') UC FROM DUAL
  
  \00FA
  
  SELECT ASCIISTR('é') UC FROM DUAL
  
  \00E9

  I know experts here will be reluctant to respond to questions about the TOAD, but I wanted to understand if I'm missing something. I checked the NLS_SESSION_PARAMETERS in SQLPLUS and TOAD, and they are the same. :-(does not understand this behavior
  
  Version of database Oracle Database * 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production *.
  
  Thanks in advance!

  The default code for the command line page is 437, identical to TOAD, you want to get the code page 1252

  SQL> host chcp
  Active code page: 437
  
  SQL> SELECT ASCIISTR('é') UC FROM DUAL;
  
  UC
  _____
  \201A
  
  SQL> host chcp 1252
  Active code page: 1252
  
  SQL> SELECT ASCIISTR('é') UC FROM DUAL;
  
  UC
  _____
  \00E9
  
  SQL>
  

• Rownum giving the Incorrect result in 11 GR 2, but works well in 10 gr 2

  Hi all
  
  We have following query that works well in 10g but in 11g is showing incorrect result.
  
  Select x.*, rownum from (select rat.rating_agency_id rat bus_ca_cpty_rating, STD MST_CP_RATING
  where rat.org_id = 618
  and
  rat.rating_agency_id = MST.rating_agency_id
  and
  rat.rating_value = MST.rating_value
  and
  rat.heritage_system = MST.heritage_system
  rat.rating_date order, rat.rating_time) x
  where rownum = 1;
  
  
  Result without the last control < where rownum = 1 > in the request (for 10g and 11g)
  RATING_AGENCY_ID ROWNUM
  1 of 3
  1 2
  
  Result of the query in 11 GR 2 (11.2.0.3)
  RATING_AGENCY_ID ROWNUM
  1 1
  
  Result of the query in 10 gr 2 (10.2.0.3)
  RATING_AGENCY_ID ROWNUM
  1 of 3
  
  Ask for your help to solve the problem (please tell me the name of bug if it's a bug) and please let me know how the request for 11g is treated.
  
  Published by: 906061 on June 19, 2012 02:22

  What's rat.rating_date, rat.rating_time for these lines.

  Are - this same...
  If they are same oracle does not guarantee which line will be the first to find the rownum = 1, unless you specify another attribute in the order by clause.

• VLOOKUP gives incorrect/unexpected results

  HI guys

  I used to think I had this spreadsheet thing down pat, but I find myself place after midnight with a VLOOKUP problem struggle! I really hope that you can show me the error of my ways...

  I'm a convert from Excel so I can be taken in a mind control thing. I built a fairly large things relating of worksheet to do a lot of hobbies. I give it to the people who do the same kind of thing I do. It calculates the SOAP making tips, but I just found out that he gets things wrong - that is potentially dangerous.

  

  I have a version simplified that what is happening in the picture above. In the F2 cell I: VLOOKUP (E2, values: results, 2, the search by proximity-match).

  Now, I expect the numbers look down column B to find the value in cell E2 (1.90) and return the corresponding value of the C column (19.0). However, it does not. Instead, it provides the value of the cell above as if it could not find a match.

  I tried every setting I can think of nothing doesn't. I put all the cells in the table above to a number to 2 decimal places. I even changed the exact match and close match but that just made things worse.

  I know it's going to be something that will make me to get started me, but I need to fix no will not hurt. Any help gratefully received.

  Cheers, Grant

  PS I think I should mention that I do this on an iPad 2 air which is a bit new for me. And I just noticed I have write in figures for Mac. I'm sorry for that but I think that the versions are supposed to have the same capabilities?

  I suspect that you use calculated values, rather than hand is entered in your "Search values" column, and even if you have formatted the column to display two decimal places, due to approximations that occur when doing calculations decimal on a computer using binary mathematics, the actual values using the VLOOKUP function differ slightly as many additional decimals on any line. If you wrap each calculation in a function to change the actual value with 2 decimal places, if the cell contains exactly what your put poster in the form, you will get the desired result.

• Indicator string displays incorrect results

  Hello, I have a duty, and I am facing some problems with string indicator.

  What I am assigned is:

  The user fills 2 bays with 5 numbers

  E FILL button is clicked, and then the program checks if the items created in table 3 matches elements in table 1 and 2.

  (I have attached the file doc for clarity).

  Channel indicator sometimes give the wrong answers. (is there a better way to solve the channel indicator?)

  Thank you.

  the vi is version 10.

  Better is how? Do not place the extra empty lines in the string? If this is the case you only need to update the chain when necessary, not every iteration of the loop. If you mean something else I don't know what you want to improve.

  There are many things that can be improved from a coding perspective. When you wire up a table in a loop, it is preferable to use automatic indexing to determine the number of iterations of the loop will run. Except that as in the case of your first loop, you must use table size to determine the number of iterations to run, not a constant value. Your second loop can be simplified and does not require the table. Use a shift register and reduce to zero the value of the Boolean value each iteration. In addition, the logic in the context of the third would be easier to understand if you used one or rather than an and. If any value is True check tables. Your actually have the reverse logic. If it is true, it is the opposite of what someone might think. Another method would be to add the two results and wire numberic value to the structure of the case. Case '0' means that everything is acceptable. If default (anything not 0) means you have unacceptable values.

  A final comment would be what is actually your stop condition? The two nested while loops seems rather strange and unnecessary.

• view inline values, which gives bad result...

  I saw a123 table with data below...

  
  

  	GRANT	AMOUNT	DRCR
  1	1234	1000	D
  2	1234	5000	C
  3	12345	2000	C
  4	12345	7000	D

  
  

  
  

  Now I want below o/p of the table of the a123

  
  

  GRANT	BALANCE
  1234	-4000
  12345	-5000

  To do this, I wrote below the query but its appropriate result not give...

  Select grant, credit-debit balance of)

  Select grant, sum (debit) Debit, sum (credit) credit of)

  Select grant,

  Drcr case when 'C' THEN amount *-1 Else NULL END in the form of credit.

  Drcr case when had ' then amount end otherwise null flow

  from a123)

  Grant group);

  top query results are below...

  	GRANT	BALANCE
  1	1234	6000
  2	12345	9000

  Please help me on this thanks...

  Pretty obvious what is wrong:

  you convert credit figures in negative numbers with the case statement

  If you have

  1	1234	1000	D
  2	1234	-5000	C
  3	12345	-2000	C
  4	12345	7000	D

  and after that you are subtracting these figures of your throughput numbers.

  Therefore, do not convert negative credits before subtracting the or if you want to make negativ, then you must add them.

  1000 + 5000 =-4000

  1000-5000 = 6000

  HTH