Update fails because of a foreign key constraint

Hello.

I have several tables in my database but 3 are important. One of them is used (Employee_ID, Last_Name and other irrelevant columns name), dentist (employe_id, Qualifications) and Wizard (Employee_ID, Qualifications).
I am applying in Oracle Application Express and trying to update a row in the Employee table, I get an ORA-20505: error in DML: p_rowid = 96, p_alt_rowid = employe_id, p_rowid2 =, p_alt_rowid2 is. ORA-02292: integrity constraint (DB. Dentist_CON) violated - book of the foundling

Now, first of all, I had the same problems with the removal of lines, but I've solved that by adding a delete cascade on foreign keys.
I have key constraints foreign both in my paintings dentist and Assistant in columns Employee_ID and these refer to Employee_ID in the Employee table.

When I update anything in my Express request form, I've allowed users to do anything of my Employee table primary key (employe_id). Any changes that might occur therefore columns unrelated to the primary key. For example, if I change the name of a particular line column I can't update because I get the above error.

I don't understand why this is happening.
If I could get a glimpse, why this is happening or using any I would be very happy.

Thanks in advance.

982909 wrote:
But it is not true. If I'm changing the name of the employee and update this line in employee WITHOUT changing the value of Employee_ID how can I possibly change the daughter line? This is what is confusing in that me and I have no idea on how to solve it.

the code below shows above is NOT true

CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER "Employee_T1".
FRONT
Insert or update on "employee."
for each line
Start
Select employee_sequence.nextval in: double new.employee_id;
end;
/

TRIGGER above changes EMPLOYEE_ID for all training update!

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • My iPAD asks me to update to OS 9.3, but the update fails because it says that the iPAD is not connected to the internet and when I connect to my computer iTunes it say my OS is up to date.  Help, please.

    My iPAD asks me to update to OS 9.3, but the update fails because it says that the iPAD is not connected to the internet and when I connect to my computer iTunes it say my OS is up to date.  Help, please.

    I'm surprised to hear that for an iPad 2 that the issue had apparently been set for 2 s. Please see this for more details as I know them. Maybe the servers at your site have not been updated yet for the new version of the iPad 2.  ???

    Apple released the update iOS 9.3 for older devices (air of iPad and previous iPhone, 5 s and previous) due to problems with Activation. See the following for details and possible solutions.

    http://www.IMore.com/Apple-working-iOS-93-fix-older-iPhone-iPad

    https://support.Apple.com/en-us/HT206203

    A new version for the iPad 2 is now available which does not require the activation step. A new version for other devices is not yet available.

  • SQL statement error INSERT The conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint

    I recently installed a reporting for vmware vsphere software, but I get a SQL error. I opened a request for assistance with vmware, but so far they have not come up with a solution. The error is caused by: com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: instruction INSERT The conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK_CB_VSM_NETWORK_VC_ID '. The conflict occurred in database 'VCChargebackVCC02', table "dbo." " CB_VSM_SERVER', column 'VC_ID '. I don't know a lot about SQL, so I'm lost in the extent of troubleshooting is concerned. If anyone has any ideas I'd love to hear them.

    SQL questions are better posed on Technet.  They are better equipped to manage the

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

  • Updates failed because Norton began a background scan.

    Windows Vista.  18 of 28 updates failed. Norton started a scan that I wasn't aware of everything and that caused the problem.

    So how the hell do I get these updates installed correctly.

    Cannot delete the contents of the "Datastore" folder or "Download" (in Windows/C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution) because windows says it's in use, although only this window was open.

    Tried to download and install KB3153171 from here:

    https://www.Microsoft.com/en-US/Download/details.aspx?ID=52222

    It started the update of Windows Installer which continued for about two hours doing nothing - I wanted to only install 1 update. I then clicked 'Cancel' and who took 30 extra minutes to cancel indeed.

    Everything that did not should be available to download again, but it is not.

    Or there should be a button "Try again", but there is none.

    I can't uninstall the updates failed because of course, they are not in the list of installed updates.

    Hi Hall2 Toad:

    Please see post # 159 of the ScousaJAY thread windows update just seems to hang when checking in the VistaForums for a possible workaround.  These Windows updates slow (WUs) are currently affecting both Win 7 and Vista. Woody Leonhard has published a series of articles on this issue in his blog Woody on Windows , including Windows 7 update holding scans always? KB 3153199 can solve the problem.

    As suggested by Woody, many users are now the solution posted on the page Web of Dalai Search for Windows Updates takes forever?-a possible solution pre-install a kernel mode driver Windows missing (Win32k.sys) updates listed on that Web page will speed up Windows Update - at least until Patch Tuesday next month, updates are released and you must first install a new update of Win32k.sys.  The author of this Web page:

    "This HowTo is valid for Win7 SP1 and SP2 for Vista, which have been newly installed or have not been updated for some time. "It should also help on systems that have been updated last month - just install the lack of updates in the list below in this case."

    I disabled updates Windows Automatic (a re-boot should stop any session WU, currently running in the background and consuming CPU) and perform a manual Windows Update a few days after Patch Tuesday updates are displayed on the second Tuesday of every month when I know that I will not need my computer for several hours.  I use Norton Internet Security and normally activate silent Mode (clic click right on the Norton icon in the system tray, choose activate silent Mode and select a long duration as 6 hours) to disable temporarily all tasks automatic Norton LiveUpdates as background and scans fast when WU is running.  Activate silent Mode doesn't disable your protection against malware in real time or Norton Firewall smart and I have no proof that Windows Update works really faster when Silent Mode is on, but I'm not all background tasks unnecessary CPU consumption when I run Windows Update these days.  Do not forget to deactivate the Silent Mode once your Windows Update is complete (I hope) to restart your Norton background tasks again.

    ------------
    32 bit Vista Home Premium SP2 * Firefox v46.0.1 * IE9 * NIS v21.7.0.11
    HP Pavilion dv6835ca Intel Core2Duo T5550 1.83 GHz, 3 GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce 8400 M GS

  • Foreign key constraint, not recognized during the synchronization of data with the model dictionary

    Hello

    Data Modeler is a foreign key constraints do not recognize when synchronizing data with the model dictionary, although the foreign key is there (in the database that a data dictionary is read). I can't find any criterion when a foreign key is not recognized by the Data Modeler. Are there limits to the length of the attribute, or the number of columns in a foreign key, or other limitations which may lead to this behavior not to recognize a fk by Data Modeler? I have columns more than 32 characters. I compared with the fk is recognized by DM, but I can't find anything that indicates why it is not recognized.

    I wonder if someone also has constraints of foreign keys that are not recognized in the comparison of data bases and model?

    Thank you

    Robert

    Hi Robert,.

    Thanks for the comments, I logged a bug.

    Philippe

  • How to associate an index with a foreign key constraint

    I understand how to associate a primary key constraint or a Unique key constraint index...
    Yet I don't see how to associate the index of a foreign key constraint. Is this possible?

    Thank you
    Bob Larsen

    Hi Bob,

    In Data Modeler, physical model for Oracle primary and unique keys dialog boxes offer an Index field using, which is used to generate the 'using_index_clause' in the DDL for primary and Unique key constraints.
    However the Oracle Database DDL does not have the "using_index_clause" for Foreign Key constraints, thus Data Modeler does not provide this feature for foreign keys.

    So, you will need to create a separate Index that uses the same columns as the foreign key (using the index page of the table properties dialog box in the relational model).

    David

  • in the setup of freshclient and datadownload foreign key constraint

    Hello

    I use oracle database 10 GB lite R3 and oracle database 10g R2 as the database back end for her. When I do the client installation fees and datadownload of the client machine I don't get the foreign key constraint in the machune of customer. can someone explain to me the reason for this?

    Published by: 793097 on November 9, 2010 21:57

    The Mobile Server deploy foreign keys out of the box. You will need to add them through scripting. You can add scripts in the MDW or API.

    Let me know if you need an example.

  • Details of the foreign key constraints

    Why foreign key constraints is not ongoing validation in case of null values?
    For example, in the table EMP and DEPT table, EMP. References DEPTNO Dept. DEPTNO.
    But I am able to insert rows into the EMP table that contains nulls for EMP. DEPTNO.

    Prasath N wrote:
    Why foreign key constraints is not ongoing validation in case of null values?
    For example, in the table EMP and DEPT table, EMP. References DEPTNO Dept. DEPTNO.
    But I am able to insert rows into the EMP table that contains nulls for EMP. DEPTNO.

    I guess he's saying essentially that a foreign key must have a parent key or can be an orphan. But may not be a key that is not listed in the parent.

    And also NULL is neither equal to anything, nor does not correspond to something.

    But still, you can put a NOT NULL constraint if you do not want your foreign key to contain orphaned records.

  • Entity Association depends on foreign key constraint?

    Hello

    I use JDeveloper 10.1.3.4 and have a question, as shown in the subject of this announcement. By a design flaw, I added a foreign key on a table constraint at the level of the database for any purpose other than to achieve a relationship between master/detail your. Now the foreign key constraint fell to remedy the irregularity, but I don't know if the application is not a problem on the road.

    The application in question has a table named BILL and another table called VALIDATIONS, both with the same primary key composite (LDAP_UID, TERM), where we hear per semester.

    BILL is on students, the balance they have, etc. VALIDATION records the commitment, students make:
    BILL
    ------------------------------------------------
    LDAP_UID       TERM      BALANCE
    -------------  --------  --------
    john.miller    200902       1500
    
    
    VALIDATIONS
    ------------------------------------------------
    LDAP_UID       TERM      CONFIRM_NUMBER
    -------------  --------  --------------
    john.miller    200902    0901100005
    The foreign key constraint has been added on the table of VALIDATION, validations (LDAP_UID, TERM) reference (LDAP_UID, TERM) BILL. When the data model is accumulated in the application, an entity association was created automatically for this foreign key constraint, and then a link has been created on the association of the entity to achieve the effect mater-detail of the application:
    Table:               BILL
    Table:               VALIDATIONS
    Foreign Key:         VALIDATIONS(LDAP_UID, TERM) references BILL(LDAP_UID, TERM)
    Entity object:       Bill
    Entity object:       Vallidations
    Entity Association:  ValidationsBillFkAssoc (based on the foreign key)
    View object:         LoggedInStudent (from Bill)
    View object:         OneValidation (from Validations)
    View link:           ValidationByOneStudent (based on ValidationsBillFkAssoc.  This achieves master/detail
                                                 between LoggedInStudent and OneValidation)
    This foreign key is now asking problem and should be deleted: Bill table contains the data from more than three semesters, whereas student commitments cumulatively saved in the table of VALIDATIONS must be maintained permanently. When data from older semesters are unloaded from the table of BILL, the lines stored in the table of VALIDATION are orphaned.

    I thought that the link of the view and the association of the entity dependent on the foreign key, so I removed before dropping the foreign key in the order listed here:
    Removed usage of of the VO (OneValidation) from the application module
    Deleted the view link (ValidationByOneStudent)
    Deleted the entity association (ValidationsBillFkAssoc)
    Dropped the foreign key in the database
    The master/detail relationship between the two your is still necessary. I added the link display, which now is based on common attributes (LdapUid, term) between the two, rather than based on the association of the entity. The modified application works very well with the database has changed and now the rows in the table of VALIDATION will not be an orphan.

    What is interesting and also troubling is that when I run a copy of the application which has been registered before these amendments, on the basis of data which dropped the foreign key constraint, the application still works, with the master-detail and everything. And the dependencies do not seem to matter. But isn't it?

    My question is: an entity association requires a corresponding foreign key in the database? If I use the copy of the application before the changes, it will be OK or it will cause unforeseen problems on the road?

    Thank you!

    Newman

    Edited by: J. Newman, October 6, 2009 10:31

    Hello

    If you've proven yourself that in fact there is no dependency between the association and the foreign key constraint. in fact you can create everything that (the primary keys, foreign keys, other constraints) only for your same features if you have nothing
    defined in database tables, which is obviously not right approach. and JDeveloper tells you only about the dependence of its use (if you want to delete something that is used some part... e. g VL in AM, EO in VO, VO in AM...)
    just to note - it is important to synchronize your OA if you change the definition of the data table. for example if you remove the foreign key of the table then right-click on EO and chose to sync - JDeveloper should acknowledge and ask you
    If you want to remove this constraint of EO.

    Kind regards

    Branislav

  • Is this a BUG?  Export of data besides the foreign key constraints

    I use SQL Developer 1.5.4 with patches installed 59,47 and 59,59. I want to do an export of database from a scheme of 10 g XE and include all objects in the DOF resulting. So I select ALL the checkboxes in the Export Wizard and when I get to step 3 to specify the objects, I don't see any of my constraints in the list box... not foreign key constraints, without constraints of primary key, without check constraints, nothing. Is this a bug, or is there a workaround, or which could possibly hurt? We want to be able to use the database export function to easily transport and track the changes to our entire schema using source control compares.

    Any help or suggestions replacement would be apprieciated.

    Thank you
    Matt

    Bug 8679318 follows this question

  • type a materialized view foreign key constraint?

    Hello.

    I have a materialized view that flows into a single column 'A' two different columns of different tables of a remote database.

    I also have a table that has a column 'B', whose values must exist in the column 'A' of the materialized view.

    So it's like defining a constraint foreign key of a table to a view, but this is not possible.

    Is it possible to do?

    I saw some triggers that verify the existence of the 'A' value before insertion in 'B', but this fails when a value is changed or deleted in 'A'

    Any suggestions?

    Thank you very much.

    Published by: user7029403 on 18-ene-2013 03:57

    There is no problem of definition of a primary key on a materialized view and then reference it with a foreign key. It works for me:

    create database link l1 connect to scott identified by tiger using 'orcl';
    create materialized view mv1 as select deptno||dname as a from dept@l1;
    alter table mv1 add constraint mv1pk primary key (a);
    alter table dept add (fkcol as (deptno||dname));
    alter table dept add constraint deptfk foreign key (fkcol) references mv1;
    

    I don't know there is a more elegant solution than to use a virtual column, which seemed the best way to get around the concatenation of two columns in a single

  • 13.0 Firefox crashes on startup almost everytime. Thus, all of the updates fail because Firefox has to restart. What should I do?

    For the past several versions of Firefox (I think 10 or 11), I had a lot of trouble to get Firefox to start. I understand not all crash IDs. It just won't start not almost everytime. Ironically, I think to be able to get to doesn't start until I opened another browser such as Internet Explorer. Then, it will start until I close it. So I have to repeat the same process (opening another browser, then try to start Firefox) every time so he could start again. Now, the problem seems to have gotten a some worst bit with version 13.0. It cannot be updated because Firefox needs to restart to update. When he tries to turn on, he can't. When I finally get Firefox to work (after opening IE), I get a notification indicating that the update failed. I saw the notice on the Web site, but does not. It drives me crazy!

    You can also check your security software (firewall) because it does not yet acknowledge the new version of Firefox 13.0.1.

    One possible cause is security software (firewall, antivirus) that prevents or limits Firefox or plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after the detection of changes (update) for the Firefox program.

    Delete all rules for Firefox and the plugin-container in the permissions list in the firewall and leave your firewall again ask permission to get full unlimited access to the internet for Firefox and the plugin-container and the update process.

    See:

  • Create a foreign key constraint against a different schema

    Hi all

    I use the oracle 10g r2 on windows 2003 server database.

    I have a table in the HRMS as STAFF.
    I have another INVENTORY schema, where I want to access a column as a foreign key in HRMS. STAFF (STAFF_ID).
    connect hrms/hrms@orcl
    grant select on STAFF to INVENTORY;
    connect inventory/inventory@orcl
    alter table inv_details add constraint fk_inv_hr_staff foreign key (staff_id) references HRMS.STAFF(STAFF_ID);
    Error report:
    SQL Error: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
    00942. 00000 -  "table or view does not exist"
    What exactly I have to grant so this diagram of the INVENTORY will be able to create a referential constraint?

    Kind regards.

    You must also grant the privilege of REFERENCES.

    See privileges in table 18-2 at http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e26088/statements_9013.htm#BGBCIIEG

    Hemant K Collette

  • Rename the foreign key constraint

    Hello

    I have table tbl_a with a column a_col1 SEO tbl_b.b_col1

    I want to create the name of the foreign key as FK_A_COL1 constraint which is FK_ < COLUMN NAME OF the CHILD >.

    Foreign naming key standards does not have the use of the name of the child under the name column.

    Is there any other solution/script to achieve this?

    Thank you.
    fkeys = model.getFKIndexAssociationSet().toArray();
    for (var i = 0; i;//also can use fk.getTable().getAbbreviation()fkname = "FK_"+fk.getTable().getName();cols = fk.getColumns();for( var k = 0;k
    
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
    
  • How to create a foreign key constraint on a table nested column

    Dear Experts,
    I create 2 tables using the object type. the VESSEL_PARAM table contains the list of the parameters allowed.
    The table VESSEL_TYPE containe single item we list some parameters.

    On this table, I love the column VESSEL_PARAM table VESSEL_PARAM to check if the settings are and the reference value is allowed.
    How to create a foreign key?
    Here my script that generates this runtime error: 00904. 00000 - '% s: invalid identifier' on this line

    ALTER TABLE VESSEL_PARAM_TAB ADD CONSTRAINT FK_VESSEL_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (NAME, DATA_VALUE)
    REFERENCES VESSEL_PARAM (PARAM_NAME, LIST_PARAM_VALUE. DATA_VALUE)
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE OBJ_PARAM_VALUE AS OBJECT 
    ( 
      DATA_VALUE  VARCHAR2(20)
     ,DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2(125)
    ) NOT FINAL;
    /
    
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE LIST_PARAM_VALUE AS TABLE OF OBJ_PARAM_VALUE;
    /
    
    -- derive object subtype from object supertype
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE OBJ_PARAM_NAME UNDER OBJ_PARAM_VALUE (
      NAME VARCHAR2(30)
    )NOT FINAL;
    /
    
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE LIST_PARAM_NAME AS TABLE OF OBJ_PARAM_NAME;
    /
    
    Prompt create table VESSEL_PARAM;
    CREATE TABLE VESSEL_PARAM (
       PARAM_NAME   VARCHAR2(20) NOT NULL
      ,PARAM_DESC   VARCHAR2(125)
      ,PARAM_VALUE  LIST_PARAM_VALUE
      ,CONSTRAINT PK_VESSEL_PARAM PRIMARY KEY (PARAM_NAME)
    ) 
    NESTED TABLE PARAM_VALUE STORE AS PARAM_VALUE_TAB
    TABLESPACE CMS_ADMDATA;
    /
    ALTER TABLE PARAM_VALUE_TAB ADD CONSTRAINT UN_PARAM_VALUE_TAB UNIQUE (DATA_VALUE);
    /
    SHOW ERROR;
    
    Prompt create table CMS_ADM.VESSEL_TYPE;
    CREATE TABLE CMS_ADM.VESSEL_TYPE (
      VESSEL_TYPE  VARCHAR2(20) NOT NULL
     ,VESSEL_DESC  VARCHAR2(125)
     ,VESSEL_PARAM LIST_PARAM_NAME
     ,CONSTRAINT PK_VESSEL_TYPE PRIMARY KEY (VESSEL_TYPE)
    -- ,CONSTRAINT FK_VESSEL_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (VESSEL_PARAM) 
    --        REFERENCES VESSEL_PARAM (PARAM_NAME)
    ) 
    NESTED TABLE VESSEL_PARAM STORE AS VESSEL_PARAM_TAB
    TABLESPACE CMS_ADMDATA;
    /
    ALTER TABLE VESSEL_PARAM_TAB ADD CONSTRAINT UN_VESSEL_PARAM_TAB UNIQUE (NAME);
    ALTER TABLE VESSEL_PARAM_TAB ADD CONSTRAINT FK_VESSEL_TYPE FOREIGN KEY (NAME,DATA_VALUE) 
            REFERENCES VESSEL_PARAM (PARAM_NAME,LIST_PARAM_VALUE.DATA_VALUE)
    /
    SHOW ERROR;
    Thank you

    Salvatore

    Could you please indicate your answer as correct if you judge them correct.

    Best regards

    Mohamed Houri

Maybe you are looking for