update several columns i using parameters passed by stored procedure

Similar Questions

• UPDATE multiple columns with conditional parameters

  I have a procedure that updates several columns of a table using the parameter of the procedure. Is it possible to have a update unique with the parameter SET conditional statement?
  

  CREATE TABLE TEMP
  (POL_NUM NUMBER,
  OED DATE,
  TERM NUMBER,
  TRANS_CD CHAR(2));
  
  INSERT INTO TEMP VALUES (1, '1 AUG 2009', 12, 'NB');
  INSERT INTO TEMP VALUES (2, '4 AUG 2009', 12, 'XL');
  INSERT INTO TEMP VALUES (3, '2 AUG 2009', 12, 'RN');
  COMMIT;
  
  CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE TMP_PROC (
    pPOL_NUM NUMBER,
    pOED IN DATE,
    pTERM IN NUMBER,
    pTRANS_CD CHAR2)
  AS
  BEGIN
    IF pOED IS NOT NULL THEN
      UPDATE TEMP SET OED = pOED WHERE POL_NUM = pPOL_NUM;
    END IF;
  
    IF pTERM IS NOT NULL THEN
      UPDATE TEMP SET TERM = pTERM WHERE POL_NUM = pPOL_NUM;
    END IF;
  
    IF pTRAN_CD IS NOT NULL THEN
      UPDATE TEMP SET TRANS_CD = pTRANS_CD WHERE POL_NUM = pPOL_NUM;
    END IF;
    COMMIT;
  EXCEPTION
    WHEN OTHERS THEN
       NULL;
  END;

  Is it possible to replace several IFs code to have only one UPDATE statement with the condition that update the column only if the parameter passed is not null? In the real world scenario, I have more than 3 columns and I do not want to write lots of IF blocks.
  
  Please help gurus!
  
  Published by: Kuul13 on September 18, 2009 13:26

  Hello

  Maybe this,.

  Create OR Replace Procedure TMP_PROC( pPOL_NUM  IN Number
                                      , pOED      IN Date
                                      , pTERM     IN Number
                                      , pTRANS_CD IN Varchar2 ) As
  Begin
     UPDATE TEMP
        SET OED      = NVL(POED     , OED )
          , TERM     = NVL(PTERM    , TERM )
          , TRANS_CD = NVL(PTRANS_CD, TRANS_CD )
      WHERE POL_NUM = PPOL_NUM;
     Commit;
  Exception
     When Others Then
        Null;
  End;
  

  Kind regards
  Christian Balz

• How to get the list of parameters of a stored procedure in Oracle?

  I'm calling an Oracle stored procedure and use the OCIBindByPos for each parameter.
  Example:
  

  /* Do the bind for date, using OCIIOV */
  OCIBindByPos (stmthp, &bindhp2, errhp, 2, (void *)&bvec[0], 
                sizeof(buf_1[0]), SQLT_STR, 
                (void *)inddate, (ub2 *)alendate, (ub2 *)rcodedate, 0,
                (ub4 *)0,  OCI_IOV);

  In this case, its necessary for a list of the parameters of the stored procedure, information such as type and the input/output parameter, etc.
  
  I can get the parameters of a stored procedure using the DESCRIBE statement.
  Example:

  SQL> DESCRIBE SP_GETCITIES
  PROCEDURE SP_GETCITIES
   Argument Name                  Type          In/Out Default?
   ---------------------- --------------------- ------ --------
   STATE_KEY              VARCHAR2               IN
   FECHA                  DATE                   IN
   RC1                    REF CURSOR             OUT
  
  SQL>

  Is there a better way to get the name, type, input/output for each parameter of an Oracle stored procedure, using the BEAK?
  
  Best regards.
  
  Antonio García (Mexico)

  Hi Antonio,.

  Take a look at "Describing metadata schema" in the programmer's Guide. He has this kind of information, which may be enough to get you going in the right direction. The guide is here:

  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E11882_01/AppDev.112/e10646/oci06des.htm#i446492

  In particular, see the code example in the section "describing the stored procedure.

  Kind regards

  Mark

• Update of column DB using a calculation

  No guy to see for a long time
  IM back again APEX and I just cant knew how to do this.
  
  I have a form with all 50 elements from a DB table
  The loading of the page, I do a complex SQL data manipulation and possibly lead to a code to two digits that appears as a page at the bottom of the page element.
  
  I need to be able to save this value in the database of the form.
  Because it is a SQL querey it cannot be a DB column
  
  I thought I was doing a text element hidden source is the DB column and using the page item as the default source, but that dident work.
  
  Any ideas?

  You can do a process whith a hint of the element of page as updated statement

  Update db_table
  point Set =: P (n) _ page_item
  where... =: _Id P (n)

  Try to run this process in an onload before or after the process of the page

  GR
  Hugo

• Creation of XML report using the PL/SQL stored procedure

  Hi friends,

  I'm working on a report xml with the xml source as a PL/SQL stored procedure.

  I mean the fiscal year indicated in the following link to understand the process:

  http://orclapp.blogspot.com/2012/02/developing-xml-publisher-report-using.html

  In the example shown in the link above, I did not understand the following:

  (1) in the following procedure, setting out "retcode" is not used at all.

  What is the importance of this parameter.

  REPORT PROCEDURE (errbuf OUT VARCHAR2, retcode OUT VARCHAR2, p_product_id in NUMBERS)

  (2) after the xml data are prepared and updates 'l_result' variable Clob, what follows

  Loop is executed. I am not able to understand why the following loop is required.

  LOOP

  EXIT WHEN l_length = l_retrieved;

  IF (l_length - l_retrieved) < 32000

  THEN

  SELECT SUBSTR (l_result, l_retrieved + 1) IN l_xmlstr FROM DUAL;

  l_retrieved: = l_length;

  fnd_file.put_line (fnd_file.output, l_xmlstr);

  ON THE OTHER

  SELECT SUBSTR (l_result, l_retrieved + 1, l_offset)

  IN l_xmlstr

  FROM DUAL;

  l_retrieved: = l_retrieved + l_offset.

  fnd_file.put_line (fnd_file.output, l_xmlstr);

  END IF;

  END LOOP;

  (3) in the example it is not explained how the concurrent program gets the xml data?

  I guess that it is written to a file by using the following line of code:

  fnd_file.put_line (fnd_file.output, l_xmlstr);

  I would be grateful if someone can shed some light in my questions above so that I can well understand the process.

  Thanks and greetings

  Hawker

  Hi 32000 in the code is a 'safe' than 32767 available max mesh, loops is intended to get around the entire thing into pieces that can be managed within the limits of the data type.

  BTW; If you are in the following Oracle e-business, you can also use the Oracle reports very simply to create the XML output.

  If you have reports developer all you need to do is put raw sql (create XML without any "Fireworks") in the SQL report and then set reporting in XML format in the definition of program in Oracle e-business.

  Best regards

  Robert.

• Update of several columns on multiple tables

  Hello

  I try to update several columns on two different tables, and I would like to know how to proceed in a SQL statement.

  I have the data I want to update in this SQL statement...

  #####################################

  Select srv. X_SERVICING_DEALER as 'The merchant name', -(want to update this column)

  SRV. X_SERVICING_SITE as ' dealer # ', -(want to update this column)

  dlrx. ATTRIB_50 'Région',--(tiens à mettre à jour cette colonne)

  dlrx. ATTRIB_49 as 'District', -(want to update this column)

  DLR.x_zone_cd as 'Zone'-(want to update this column)

  Of

  s_srv_req srv,

  s_org_ext dlr,

  s_org_ext_x dlrx

  where dlr.row_id = srv.pr_con_org_id

  and dlr.row_id = dlrx. par_row_id

  and srv.row_id = 1-1RSEXAV';

  #####################################

  Any guidance would be appreciated.  Thanks in advance.

  Chris

  > I'm trying to update several columns on two different tables, and I would like to know how to proceed in a SQL statement.

  You can not.  Only one table can be updated at the same time.

• Select cursor for update: multiple columns of different tables

  Hello
  
  I have two tables test1 and test2. I want to udpate the column (DEPT_DSCR) from the TEST1 and TEST2 using select for update and current tables of the... with the cursor.
  
  I have a code drafted as follows:
  DECLARE
  v_mydept1 TEST1. TYPE % DEPT_CD;
  v_mydept2 TEST2. TYPE % DEPT_CD;
  CURSOR C1 IS SELECT TEST1. DEPT_CD, TEST2. DEPT_CD OF TEST1, TEST2 WHERE TEST1. DEPT_CD = TEST2. DEPT_CD AND TEST1. DEPT_CD IS 'AA' FOR THE UPDATE OF TEST1. DEPT_DSCR, TEST2. DEPT_DSCR;
  BEGIN
  OPEN C1;
  LOOP
  FETCH C1 INTO v_mydept1, v_mydept2;
  WHEN EXIT C1% NOTFOUND;
  UPDATE TEST1 SET DEPT_DSCR IS "PLSQL1" WHERE CURRENT OF C1;.
  SETTING A DAY TEST2 SET DEPT_DSCR = 'PLSQL2' WHERE CURRENT OF C1.
  END LOOP;
  COMMIT;
  END;
  
  The code above when it is run, declares that it runs successfully. But it does not update the columns you want [DEPT_DSCR].
  
  It works only when we want to update one or more columns of the same table... i. e by providing these columns after ' to UPDATE THE.
  I don't know what exactly is the problem when you want to update several columns of different tables.
  
  Can someone help me on this?

  user12944938 wrote:
  But it's more the notion of compensation and understanding.

  See the link below:
  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B10501_01/AppDev.920/a97269/pc_06sql.htm

  See the section RESTRICTION in the link above.

  Twinkle

• [BC] Call a stored procedure taking parameters of table

  Hello!

  I currently have a request of the OIC that makes thousands of calls per second stored procedure. The stored procedure runs a business logic that I want my client application to stay informed.  I want to reduce the cat of the database and instead to call the stored procedure from thousands of times per second, call the procedure (for example) once per second, but with values of one mile.

  I used OCIBindArrayOfStruct successfully to perform inserts bulk, where my OCI application executes a () INSERT INTO using the function "iters" and it might be possible to do something similar with the stored procedure, but I want to do something slightly different, because the procedure stored something like this:

  * If a specific condition is set, call a secondary stored procedure

  * If another special condition is set, insert a row into a table of some

  I so wanted to do was to pass a table (or a series of tables) in the stored procedure, then the stored procedure to use optimal methods that are available, such as FORALL, to perform each of the tasks, the more effectively.

  So I thought to create a type, such as a TABLE OF VARCHAR2, or a VARRAY and possessing of the parameters for the stored procedure based on this type, something like:

  create or replace TYPE 'NTT_VARCHAR2' AS TABLE OF VARCHAR2 (32700);

  create or replace FUNCTION bulk_process_values)

  p_error_message OUT NOCOPY VARCHAR2,

  p_module_context_name OUT NOCOPY VARCHAR2,

  p_sql_error OUT NOCOPY VARCHAR2,

  p_count in NUMBERS

  p_non_array_var_1 IN VARCHAR2,

  p_non_array_var_2 IN VARCHAR2,

  p_array_var_1 IN NTT_VARCHAR2,

  p_array_var_2 IN NTT_VARCHAR2,

  p_array_var_3 IN NTT_VARCHAR2

  < etc. for all the variables in table >)

  RETURN NUMBER

  .. .but I am struggling to find an example of how call the procedure "bulk_process_values" stored, and even if I use a TABLE OF VARCHAR2 or a VARRAY as a parameter type.

  I searched the Internet and found this: OIC - how to bind an array to a stored procedure? - and binding table of the structs (OCIBindArrayOfStruct) sample code

  - but they take different approaches and a bit confused (the second example spoke of OTT).

  I think that the first approach is more likely to be the solution I need - but I can't help thinking - it is a bunch of stuff to move if it does not end up significantly improve performance!

  My questions are:

  * Moves to a call-SP-thousands-of-times-per-second to call-SP-fewer-times-but-with-array-parameters sensitive?

  * Should the table or VARRAY, TABLE OF VARCHAR2 parameters or something else?

  * Should I use for my case OTT?

  Samples I found are both very old - and the second example indicators that the optimal approach evolves with the OCI versions - I'm on 11.2, what is the optimal approach these days?

  * < added later > why is there no official useful example?

  Thank you very much

  Much appreciated. https://community.oracle.com/message/4528528#4528528 has actually worked, with VARRAY, with a proof of concept. Now I just need to shake a little and then get my PL/SQL for optimal PC experts. I think I was really discouraged by the lack of official documents, with the Community (Paradise) is the only way to get real results.

  Thank you JJ.

  I intend me to use the binding enforcement of the table and the table and avoid N back and forth, but I do not then get the opportunity to do something clever in the PL/SQL.

  In the PL/SQL, there is no logic occurring - I don't call the same SP tons of times, but then I want to be able to use PL/SQL optimizations such as FORALL, BULK COLLECT, reduce the number of validations and others.  There is a commit after each SP run, because otherwise the nature of demand means that the application hangs occur; However, there is a way (I think) be smart on the part that is likely to deadlock (making a shape on the Bay First, then applying the updates in the order sorted and then failed to get a blocking theoretically), and then FORALL insert for the second part of the stored procedure.

  I guess I may apply the single return, passing a table (to a commit in the SP)-which will reduce back and forth, so gain in performance, but it will not reduce the number of validations that I do - and Oracle said that commits too frequent is not good for performance. I already have code in my framework that does - by making a simple INSERT INTO.

  Good to hear that OTT is not explicitly required - and VARRAY resembles the approach to try first.

• Call the stored procedure, and bind parameters by name

  Hello

  I use the Oracle ODBC 12 c driver to pass values from one Interface to our database Oracle 11.2. The Interface software collects data from modbus protocoll and calls a stored procedure. Right now my syntax to call the stored procedure looks like this:

  CALL procedure-name ('STRING', 'Timestamp as String', numValue1);

  It works very well. Now, I have to add a default setting to my procedure. To stay flexible to make other changes, I want to call the procedure and bind the parameters by name. Release 10.2.0.1.0 ISC ODBC Notes:

  Added support for the named parameter, binding the parameters by name. ODBC Oracle driver now allows the application to specify the parameters of a stored procedure by name, in the procedure call. Named parameters are to be used in calls to stored procedures and should not be used in other SQL statements.

  So, it shouldn't be a problem to use named notation, but how do I do this in ODBC? I tried like this, but oracle returns an ora-00936 error of missing expression:

  call procedure-name (paramName1 = > 'STRING',= paramName2 > 'Timestamp as String',paramName3 = > numValue1).

  
  

  Thank you for your help.

  Finally, I was able to find the error. The syntax of the statement was very good. The problem was caused by another declaration that I edited before and the error has not attracted Attention immediately.

  Thanks for reading and looking for an answer.

• How to pass an object of the stored procedure?

  Hello.
  
  After reading the documentation online 'The JDBC Oracle9i developer reference Guide' how to use oracle.sql.STRUCT to pass the java classes to database objects and how do the same thing in the sense opposite, I still don't know how to do what I need, I would like to know a few resourse online where I could find more examples.
  I guess it must be quite easy to do.
  
  I learned to create a java class that will be used to call a stored procedure (9i database) that has a single input/output parameter whose type is a user-defined object.
  
  I'm trying to do something similar, by I was not able. This is my essay:

  CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE                  FERNANDO.TIPOBD AS OBJECT (   ID INTEGER,   NOMBRE VARCHAR2(50),   HORA TIMESTAMP ); / CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE FERNANDO.prueba_java AS   PROCEDURE prueba (objetoJava IN OUT TIPOBD); END prueba_java; / CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY FERNANDO.prueba_java AS   PROCEDURE prueba (objetojava IN OUT TIPOBD)   AS   BEGIN       NULL;   END prueba; END prueba_java; /

  import java.sql.*; //import oracle.sql.*; import oracle.jdbc.*; import oracle.sql.*; public class Prueba { public static void main(String[] args) { Connection conexion = GestorConexion.getConexion(); if (conexion != null) {   try {     DatabaseMetaData meta = conexion.getMetaData();     System.out.println("JDBC driver version is " + meta.getDriverVersion()); int num = 0; String consulta = "select 1 from dual"; PreparedStatement ps = conexion.prepareStatement(consulta); ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery(); if (rs.next()) { num = rs.getInt(1); } System.out.println("num == "+num); ObjetoOracle oo = new ObjetoOracle(1, "Fernando", new Timestamp(1) ); System.out.println("id: "+oo.getId()+"; nombre: "+oo.getNombre()); // Se llama al procedimiento almacenado String llamada = new String(); llamada += "BEGIN "; llamada += "  FERNANDO.prueba_java.prueba(?)"; llamada += "END;"; StructDescriptor structdesc = StructDescriptor.createDescriptor("FERNANDO.TIPOBD", conexion); STRUCT struct = new STRUCT(structdesc, conexion, null); OracleCallableStatement ca = (OracleCallableStatement)conexion.prepareCall(llamada); //ca.setObject(1, oo); ca.setObject(1, null); ca.registerOutParameter(1, OracleTypes.JAVA_OBJECT); ca.execute(); } catch (SQLException sqle) { System.out.println(sqle.toString()); } } else { System.out.println("CONEXIÓN con bd nula"); } } }

  My if intend to create an oracle.sql.STRUCT object that I'll pass to the procedure and then get back to the procedure, but I can not even create the StructDescriptor.
  It is the output that I get:

  Conexión con BD ok JDBC driver version is 9.2.0.8.0 num == 1 id: 1; nombre: Fernando java.sql.SQLException: Tipo no definido: get_next_type

  Any help would be welcome. Thanks in advance.

  You must add the name of the type of your call registerOutParameter (.).
  ca.registerOutParameter ("", OracleTypes.JAVA_OBJECT, FERNANDO. TIPOBD);

  You can consider using OracleTypes.STRUCT instead of JAVA_OBJECT.

  You must also change your call set *;.
  ca.setObject ("", FERNANDO of the object. TIPOBD, OracleTypes.STUCT);

  You can use the same string parameter "" to the two parameters or
  You can use the same parameter INT for both parameters.

  You cannot combine parameters named and numbered together. I was using both for a single method or both using the other.
  The syntax may be different according to the method you in order to verify the Java Doc.

• Tables created in a stored procedure cannot be used with dynamic SQL? The impact?

  There is a thread on the forum which explains how to create tables within a stored procedure (How to create a table in a stored procedure , however, it does create a table as such, but not how to use it (insert, select, update, etc.) the table in the stored procedure.) Looking around and in the light of the tests, it seems that you need to use dynamic SQL statements to execute ddl in a stored procedure in Oracle DB. In addition, it also seems that you cannot use dynamic SQL statements for reuse (insert, select, update, etc.) the table that was created in the stored procedure? Is this really the case?
  
  If this is the case, I am afraid that if tables cannot be 'created and used"in a stored procedure using the dynamic SQL, as is the case with most of the servers of DB dynamic SQL is not a part of the implementation plan and, therefore, is quite expensive (slow). This is the case with Oracle, and if yes what is the performance impact? (Apparently, with Informix, yield loss is about 3 - 4 times, MS SQL - 4 - 5 times and so on).
  
  In summary, tables created within a stored procedure cannot be 'used' with dynamic SQL, and if so, what is the impact of performance as such?
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  Amedeo.
  
  Published by: AGF on March 17, 2009 10:51

  AGF says:
  Hi, Frank.

  Thank you for your response. I understand that the dynamic SQL is required in this context.

  Unfortunately, I am yet to discover "that seeks to" using temporary tables inside stored procedures. I'm helping a migration from MySQL to Oracle DB, and this was one of the dilemmas encountered. I'll post what is the attempt, when more.

  In Oracle, we use [global temporary Tables | http://www.psoug.org/reference/OLD/gtt.html?PHPSESSID=67b3adaeaf970906c5e037b23ed380c2] aka TWG these tables need only be created once everything like a normal table, but they act differently when they are used. The data inserted in TWG will be visible at the session that inserted data, allowing you to use the table for their own temporary needs while not collide with them of all sessions. The data of the TWG will be automatically deleted (if not deleted programmatically) when a) a commit is issued or b) the session ends according to the parameter that is used during the creation of the TWG. There is no real need in Oracle to create tables dynamically in code.

  I noticed that many people say that the "Creation of the tables within a stored procedure" is not a good idea, but nobody seems necessarily explain why? Think you could elaborate a little bit? Would be appreciated.

  The main reason is that when you come to compile PL/SQL code on the database, all explicit references to tables in the code must correspond to an existing table, otherwise a djab error will occur. This is necessary so that Oracle can validate the columns that are referenced, the data types of those columns etc.. These compilation controls are an important element to ensure that the compiled code is as error free as possible (there is no accounting for the logic of programmers though ;)).

  If you start to create tables dynamically in your PL/SQL code, so any time you want to reference this table you must ensure that you write your SQL queries dynamically too. Once you start doing this, then Oracle will not be able to validate your SQL syntax, check the types of data or SQL logic. This makes your code more difficult to write and harder to debug, because inevitably it contains errors. It also means that for example if you want to write a simple query to get that one out in a variable value (which would take a single line of SQL with static tables), you end up writing a dynamic slider all for her. Very heavy and very messy. You also get the situation in which, if you create tables dynamically in the code, you are also likely to drop tables dynamically in code. If it is a fixed table name, then in an environment multi-user, you get in a mess well when different user sessions are trying to determine if the table exists already or is the last one to use so they can drop etc. What headache! If you create tables with table names, then variable Dynamics not only make you a lot end up creating (and falling) of objects on the database, which can cause an overload on the update of the data dictionary, but how can ensure you that you clean the tables, if your code has an exception any. Indeed, you'll find yourself with redundant tables lying around on your database, may contain sensitive data that should be removed.

  With the TWG, you have none of these issues.

  Also, what is the impact on the performance of the dynamic SQL statements in Oracle? I read some contrasting opinions, some indicating that it is not a lot of difference between static SQL and SQL dynamic in more recent versions of Oracle DB (Re: why dynamic sql is slower than static sql is this true?)

  When the query runs on the database, there will be no difference in performance because it is just a request for enforcement in the SQL engine. Performance problems may occur if your dynamic query is not binding variable in the query correctly (because this would cause difficult analysis of the query rather than sweet), and also the extra time, to dynamically write the query running.

  Another risk of dynamic query is SQL injection which may result in a security risk on the database.

  Good programming will have little need for the tables of dynamically created dynamically or SQL.

• SQL stored procedure input and output parameters

  Hello Gang,

  My dead end trying to call a stored procedure in SQL Server 2008 with the LV database tool.

  for purposes of experimentation, I've created a small procedure with an input parameter that returns an integer as return value.  It works describing a query, but all attempts at LV produce an error-2147217900 when executing query VI.  I did find examples of that.

  Sending a bunch of parameters to a stored procedure and checking the value of return seems to be pretty common stuff.

  I'll appreciate any help.

  Thank you

  Roger

  Hi Roger,

  There are a few prerequisites which I will list below. If you have not checked these things, so don't hesitate, as your hiccups can be there.

  Prerequisites:

  1. Ensure that you can read from a table in the database to verify that you can access the database (user permissions) and ensure that your login details are correct. Among other things, make sure that the. DSN switches to the correct database. (See the simple example below, SQL Select.vi)
     
  2. Make sure that your user (if you use SQL authentication) has permissions to run the STORED procedure by running the procedure in SQL Server Management Studio (you seem to have already done this)

  Example by calling a procedure without parameters (attached as SPROC_No_Parameters.vi):

  

  Example by calling a procedure with parameters (attached as SPROC_Parameters.vi):

  

  An article on the execution of stored procedures is here:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/07FD130746083E0686257300006326C4

  Don't forget to download the example VI since it includes the cases where you want an output parameter of the procedure rather than a table.

  I tested these against two very simple SPROCs and it worked fine (on SQL Server 2005, but 2008 should be the same).  Stored procedures have been:

  CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo]. [GetContacts]

  AS
  BEGIN
  -SET NOCOUNT ON added to avoid additional results sets from
  -interfering with SELECT statements.
  SET NOCOUNT ON;

  -Controls insert for procedure here
  SELECT * FROM Contacts
  END

  and

  CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo]. [MultiplyAges]
  @param1 INT = 1
  AS
  BEGIN
  -SET NOCOUNT ON added to avoid additional results sets from
  -interfering with SELECT statements.
  SET NOCOUNT ON;

  -Controls insert for procedure here
  SELECT (age * @param1) OF Contacts
  END

  I would like to know if these examples work for you or if you have any other questions.  Don't forget to go through this KB article and articles related to it, they should cover other situations.

  Matt

• Release of stored procedure after UPDATE

  Hello
  I've written a LOOP that calls a second stored procedure.
  In the second stored procedure, I have 3 INSERTS the values of each SELECT limited with a WHERE clause.
  
  Example:
  

  begin
  
  dynsql:=INSERT INTO destinationtable (ID,DATE,NAME)
  SELECT src.ID,src.DATE, dest.NAME FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.JAN.2012 and '03.JAN.2012' --if not condition not met, no insert
  execute immediate dynsql;
  dynsql:=UPDATE destinationtable SET DATE = dest.DATE FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.JAN.2012 and '03.JAN.2012'
  execute immediate dynsql;
  
  
  dynsql:=INSERT INTO destinationtable (ID,DATE,NAME)
  SELECT src.ID,src.DATE, dest.NAME FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.APR.2012 and '01.MAY.2012'  --if not condition not met, no insert
  execute immediate dynsql
  dynsql:=UPDATE destinationtable SET DATE = dest.DATE FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.APR.2012 and '01.MAY.2012'
  execute immediate dynsql;
  
  
  dynsql:=INSERT INTO destinationtable (ID,DATE,NAME)
  SELECT src.ID,src.DATE, dest.NAME FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between '01.JUN.2012 and '01.JUL.2012'  --if not condition not met, no insert
  execute immediate dynsql;
  dynsql:=UPDATE destinationtable SET DATE = dest.DATE FROM sourcetable src INNER JOIN destinationtable dest ON dest.ID=src.ID WHERE dest.date between  '01.JUN.2012 and '01.JUL.2012'
  execute immediate dynsql;
  
  end;
  
  
  
  commit;

  What should I do?
  I update the existing line of 'old' with a new date, and then I'm basically duplicate this line but add a new DATE, the NAME and the ID is 'copied' as it is.
  The big problem is that the lines of recursive updates. If the first statement updates a date, it could become a 'true' conditions for the second and the first update
  That is not what I want. Initially, only one of the instructions is true, never. The problem with my code, is that after the first update and the setting of the date, the other "could" become reality.
  This should stop. After the update has occurred, I need to stop the stored procedure.
  
  How can I stop put an after?

  Use sql % rowcount after an immediate execution.

  If sql % rowcount = 0, no line have been set to day/insert/selected.
  If sql % rowcount > 0 then lines have been updated/inserted/selected day.

• How to use ab ObjectType for maintain values in a stored procedure

  Hello
  
  I use oracle 10g and oracle sql developer as user interface. I have an object of that type is created like this.
  
  create or replace
  TYPE T_T_PARTY_REQUEST_IDENTIFIER
  AS THE T_O_PARTY_REQUEST_IDENTIFIER TABLE;
  
  create or replace
  TYPE T_O_PARTY_REQUEST_IDENTIFIER
  AS AN OBJECT
  (
  NUMBER OF REQUEST_IDENTIFER (13, 0)
  )
  
  I want to use it in the stored procedure. so I set a variable like this and
  
  V_T_T_PARTY_REQUEST_IDENTIFIER T_T_PARTY_REQUEST_IDENTIFIER: = T_T_PARTY_REQUEST_IDENTIFIER (null);
  
  tried to insert the value
  
  SELECT PR. PRTY_RQST_ID IN V_T_T_PARTY_REQUEST_IDENTIFIER
  OF prty_rqst pr
  I am getting following error.
  
  Procedure CTH_USER. RETRIEVE_PARTY_REQUEST@CTH_ME
  Error (183.9): PL/SQL: statement ignored
  Error (183,16): PL/SQL: ORA-00932: inconsistent data types: expected UDT got the NUMBER
  
  Can someone help me on this. I have very little knowledge of PL/sql.
  
  Thanks in advance
  
  Christian mud

  DECLARE
     lv_t_party   tt_tester := NEW tt_tester ();
     lv_o_party   to_tester := NEW to_tester (NULL);
  BEGIN
     FOR i IN (SELECT     LEVEL a
                     FROM DUAL
               CONNECT BY LEVEL < 10)
     LOOP
        lv_t_party.EXTEND (1);
        lv_o_party.request_identifer := i.a;
        lv_t_party (1) := lv_o_party;
        DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (lv_o_party.request_identifer);
     END LOOP;
  END;
  

  -check the code above, I fixed it

  Kind regards
  friend

  Edited by: most wanted! on March 18, 2013 01:57

• Hello! I use a PC and have problems loading my homepage of Muse. First of all, I made one with the address "nordensstjarnor" and updated several times without any problems. And once, I couldn't download on 'nordensstjarnor' any longer. Don't know why, s

  Hello! I use a PC and have problems loading my homepage of Muse. First of all, I made one with the address "nordensstjarnor" and updated several times without any problems. And once, I couldn't download on 'nordensstjarnor' any longer. Don't know why, when he got the address "nordensstjrnor". That me ok at first, but now I really need to give the first address once again, "nordensstjarnor". But when I try, the alternative of the site of ' publish on ' old isn't here. And if I try to create a new one, but with the old URL, the box turns red. What can I do?

  The reason why you cannot change nordensstjarnor.businesscatalyst.com is because a different Adobe ID is used for the publication of this site.

  t * [email protected] is used for the publication of nordensstjarnor.businesscatalyst.com

  t s. * [email protected] is used for the publication of nordensstjarnorindex.businesscatalyst.com

  You must make sure that Adobe ID is used in account publish, so that you can see a list of the websites published under this account. Go in Edition > Preferences > publish on Business Catalyst > publish with accounts

  You can pass the accounts for you can also make changes to the sites.

  Thank you

  Sanjit