Using Cisco AP as router and DHCP server

I'm a newbie in the technology of Cisco wireless. I have a lot of Cisco wireless access point. One of them (1142AG-K9 Cisco) I want to set them up as a DHCP server and will forward traffic to the public ip address as it will route the traffic to 203.82.203.50 (Ip provided by ISP) and will lease ip as associated devices 192.168.10.0 pool.

Even though I know that it is possible using a router on the AP. But it is possible using a single access point?

If so, how?

Help, please.

Hi, the AP cisco are just basic layer 2 devices such as a hub or Layer 2 switch, it does not any layer 3 as a wireless router.

The Cisco access point supports to have a VLAN or subnet configured or more VLANS or subnets and will pass all traffic to a layer 3 devic so that traffic can be routed to the need.

The Ap can't stand to have an addrees ip configured on the bvi1 for the management.

Also the build in the ap dhcp option is very limited and will only know the ip address to wirless clints that connect to it on an ssid linked to its management interface in this case that the bvi1 and all them VLAN othe or subnets shall not use an external dhcp server.

Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

Tags: Cisco Wireless

Similar Questions

  • RV320 as SBS2011 router as DHCP server and use IPSEC

    p {margin-bottom: 0.25 cm; line-height: 120% ;}}

    Our society is really eager to acquire a VPN Cisco RV320 router to replace our old insecurity only PPTP VPN-router. Before actually buying the router, there are a few questions I'd like to have answered.

    In our current setup, we have a SBS2011 standard Server which is used as a DHCP, DNS, Exchange, and SMB server to our network of the company, all the peripheral functions within the same network (192.168.0.1/24).
    We would like to add the RV320 to our network to allow access of employees to the corporate network when they are at home or on the road using IPSEC VPN (client site).

    In our current configuration us use (or used) a VPN router and VPN clients allowed to acquire an IP address from the PPTP server, these IP addresses have fallen in a range that the DHCP SBS2011 server was free to distribute the. It's quite simple actually

    How can we configure the router RV320 so that there will be any conflict between the RV320 router and SBS2011 Server regarding distributing them IP addresses to the VPN IPSEC clients?

    Can configure us the RV320 to transfer earlier requests DHCP server SBS2011?  We want all customers (including IPSEC VPN clients so that they enter the same network).
    Is it possible to simply using the DHCP-relay option (in the web interface) and entering the IP address of the server SBS2011?

    We should disable the DHCP on the router-RV320, or is there another way to continue using the SBS2011 server as the DHCP server, while allowing client-to-site IPSEC VPN for access to our local network?

    Thanks in advance

    Hello and thanks for the exam Cisco for your network needs.

    First of all, I understand that you are used to working with the PPTP connection and now you want to switch to a more secure IPSec connection.

    It's a great idea, but there are a few things to consider:

    1. the RV320 supports the IPSec VPN via the Cisco VPN Client 5.0, you can download it from the site Web of Cisco if after you buy a contract for the router.

    The contract will set will cost about $70, depending on where you decide to buy it, but it has several features including 3 years of telephone support 24/7 and next day replacement guarantee for business if the unit doesn't respond, it also allows you to download special software like the Cisco VPN Client.

    2. for client VPN connection, you can not, or you need to try to relay the DHCP request what, whether the router will handle it and he will probably be on a different subnet from your local network, but it will you access to all devices on the network.

    3-If you do not want to buy the contract, then you can always use PPTP to the RV320 and it will give you the same access that you are already accustomed.

    I hope that was helpful, please let us know if you have any other questions.

  • Requirement of DNS and DHCP Server Essentials 2012 home

    I have a Server Windows Essentials 2012 acting as DNS and DHCP server with a domain name for backups etc on my home network. It's that everything works fine, no errors, no problem. Works well actually, telling me when the children did not install updates or restarted.

    I have two groups of users. My sons step, 10 and 12, which I want to use OpenDNS as a provider external DNS with a policy very, very limited and my wife and me who want to use indications of root or Google DNS or any other DNS provider. Others, specific devices no user (box of the xBox, WII, Satellite, TV, CCTV etc.) can use.

    Before the 2012 server, I had a 2 k 3 server running in a virtual machine for DHCP, alone and put my wife and my devices on static reservations with the just and external DNS provider used OpenDNS as the default scope, DNS. Unfortunately different bits of domain services 2012 don't seem to work unless the server of 2012 is the first DNS server listed on client machines (backups failed. Impossible to find other local computers). Currently, this means that we are all using OpenDNS.

    What I would like is a way to say 2012 to send adult group DNS queries to another DNS provider and leave the rest at default to OpenDNS, while still having them register in the original DNS domain. Any suggestions?

    This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN

    http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  • Cisco 1921 & SG500 VLAN and DHCP problem

    Dear all,

    Thank you in advance for taking the time to read this.

    A little history:

    I want to install a project for an athlete, which is unfortunately on a budget pretty tight with a potentially large quantity of network users (~ 200 without public WIFI). I need to separate the 5 groups of users and to give them all access to internet without see each other. 5 user groups also share the same bandwidth to the internet and VLANs must be controlled bandwidth.

    To do this, I had planned to use Cisco devices built-in functions and buy a 1921 Cisco router as a switch of SG500.

    I have configured the router for 8 subinterfaces is internal NIC with 8 VLAN. I also configured DHCP Pools 8 on the 1921 and set up NAT and firewall.

    What I want to do now is have the SG500 to recognize the VLAN ID, I configured on the router (as well as on the switch using the same VLAN ID numbers), and then assign ports to the VLAN on the switch, and depending on where I plug into the switch, the device receives different IP addresses from DHCP.

    However, I can't get this to work. The router works fine, the 'intact' if left switch gives me an IP address from the DHCP server on the IP address of higher network VLAN (I.e. 168.8.0). but I can not configure the switch ports correctly so that it works. I was also confused, is that dhcp pools that I have configured on the command-line command on the router do not appear in professional CP in the mask of the pool.

    Can someone kindly check the configuration of the router and throw some guidance on how I need to configure the Ports on the SG500? I must say that I have had too many nights and I seem to confuse tagging, untagging, to exclusion and prohibiting the ;.)

    I have the router for you here:

    Thanks again and good night!

    W.

    Hi Wolfgang, for the sx500 configuration can be something like this

    config t

    database of VLAN

    VLAN 2-8

    int item in gi1/1/1

    switchport mode general

    switchport trunk allowed vlan add 2-8 tag

    switchport General disable filtering of capture

    For any client that connects must be no tagged coelio

    So if you want a client access port then you should do something like 5 unidentified to this port

    config t

    int item in gi1/1/2

    switchport mode access

    switchport access vlan 5

    -Tom
    Please mark replied messages useful

  • RV042G and DHCP server

    Hello

    The RV042G takes by acting as a DHCP server on several local networks virtual (or alone)?

    Im going to set up three separate VLAN (no routing between the two) and want the router to provide addresses on all three VLAN (different subnets). The RV042G will do the job?

    Appreciate any input

    / Claes

    Paindivine,

    Please refer to this previous post.

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/11576126/RV042-multiple-subnets

  • Series of unmanaged switches 100 and DHCP

    Hi all, we have a router RV082 switch 8 ethernet ports, it is actually 8 lan with a DHCP address assignment devices (router is used as switch/router and DHCP server).

    Now we need to increase the number of attached LAN devices (other pc, printers, etc.), and we think buy Cisco 100 ethernet switch Series 16 or 24 ports to connect to RV082.

    In this case RV082 will be able to assign DHCP addresses for devices connected to the eth switch ports?

    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Loris, yes it is not a problem. You should be able to switch on a lan port, connect computers to the switch and things should be OK.

    -Tom
    Please mark replied messages useful

  • SGE2010 - traffic relay and DHCP configuration

    Hei

    We bought just a switch SGE2010 we want to use to replace the switches in the control panel of our office. So far I managed to access the switch and assigned a static ip.adress on our net, but I can't get to our entry point switch relay traffic. I have a test machine that is configured with a static IP as well and tried the ok sign, but as soon as I put the switch between traffic is not relayed.

    The idea was to use this switch as a DHCP as well. But I thought it would be a start to get at least the traffic relayed before starting the dhcp part.

    Only configuration settings I have done factory settings are the following: (note that the IP is slightly adjusted, but consistent for reasons of confidentiality)

    Configuration of the IP4

    1. Assigned to a static ip address: 95.59.69.148
    2. Assigned a subpattern: 255.255.255.192
    3. Assigned to a user-defined gateway: 95.59.69.129

    DNS configuration

    1. Assigned to an ip address dns address: active 95.59.0.100
    2. Assigned to a dns ip address: 95.59.0.200

    All these settings are the default settings that we use when we assign a server with a static ip address, so it is not a pick up of our filtration dhcp server. So my main question is why on earth isn't it relay traffic?

    In addition, we are interested to kill the former (with stones, I hope) dhcp server and dhcp on the sge2010 configuration. The current dhcp is an operating system. X dhcp server (Yes a mac) with the following configuration:

    • (Dynamic ip) subnet
      From ip: 95.59.69.179
      Ending ip: 95.59.69.190
      Subnet: 255.255.255.192
    • Router ip: 95.59.69.129
      Rental time: 3 hours
    • The range 95.59.69.130 to 95.59.69.149 we set up manually on the servers, hardware, etc.
    • DNS server: 95.59.0.100 & 95.59.0.200
      Default search domain: No. - dns - available.example.com
    • And then we have a group of static mappings to Mac-addresses
      ip address: 95.59.69.150
      IP: 95.59.69.178

    I tried to see in the configuration where I could the mappings static spesify range etc, but I can't say it got me anywhere. So my second question is how to install a server dhcp of Eric as a designated above?

    It's nice to finally convince the CEO to move the dhcp to a better metal, but it's not as nice having a hard time setting up. I would apprecitate every possible leeds and suggestions since I'm kinda stuck.

    Thanks in advance

    Rafn.R

    Hello

    My SGE2000P forwards DHCP requests on my DHCP server.

    I used my default VLAN1 as an interface routed to unicast request DHCP relay on my server (router ISR UC520) that resides on that VLAN 1.

    My interface Vlan 1 on my SGE2000P has an IP 192.168.10.254.

    My gateway address for potential hosts in VLAN 2 IP will be the ADDRESS IP I AI ASSIGNES to VLAN 2, because the PC or the IP hosts connected to VLAN2 will use IP VLAN2 interface as the gateway. It's just how it works!

    Hosts of PC on VLAN 2 need of a default route and they use the IP I assigned to VLAN2 as their next jump out VLAN2 on the real world.

    This address can be seen below.

    DHCP relay is enabled with the option 82

    I chose VLAN2 as an interface VLAN, as shown below.

    I have two ports not signposted in the VLAN2, and I joined an IP host to G1 so that I can test the DHCP relay.

    I get the following debug output from my dhcp server, so I know the relay is working.

    002624: 19:40:08.575 Dec 5: DHCPD: looking for expiry of the leases.

    002625: 19:40:58.408 Dec 5: DHCPD: DISCOVER notification to:

    002626: 19:40:58.408 Dec 5: DHCPD: htype 1 CHADRR 0025.84d8.d008

    002627: 19:40:58.408 Dec 5: DHCPD: id remote 020a0000c0a80a0101080001

    002628: 19:40:58.408 Dec 5: DHCPD: id circuit 00000000

    002629: 19:40:58.408 Dec 5: DHCPD: see if there is a specified internal pool class:

    But I must confess that I have opened a case on it with the Small Business Support Center, because I think I can see something wrong on my DHCP server debugging.

    But the key is that I see the router WAN/DHCP server, see the query from DHCP.

    The only way to the broadcast DHCP requests can get to the DHCP server, if the switch SGE2000P takes these DHCP broadcast requests and unicast these or relay to my server DHCP IP address 192.168.10.1.

    So in other words he tries to relay DHCP.

    I would ask you to please check the SGE2010 Administrator's guide because it clearly shows how to configure the DHCP on the SGE2010 relay.

    Even if the screen capture shows and the old version of the code below.  I have day my SGE2000P tonight at the generally available (GA) version of the code.

    Just outa interest, if you telnet to the switch, is your mode of layer 3 or Layer 2 switch.

    I can also say from your screenshot that your uplink ports are in overlay mode.

    Maybe if you don't use stacking, you can set your switch to the layer 3 mode and standalone mode

    Best regards, Dave

  • Cisco IOS DHCP Server + classless static routes on DHCP clients

    Hi, I tried to find if it is possible to add the ability for static routes to DHCP clients on the Cisco IOS DHCP configuration mode. I'm looking to add a parameters as defined in RFC 3442, like this one, located on the ISC DHCPd server:

    Global settings:

    121 = integer table 8 code option rfc3442-classless-static-routes;

    ms-classless-static-routes option code 249 = integer table 8;

    And for the subnet declaration:

    option rfc3442-classless-static-routes 24, 192, 168, 30, 192, 168, 10, 1;

    option 24 ms-classless-static-routes, 192, 168, 30, 92, 168, 10, 1;

    Is this possible?

    Thank you!

    Vitor

    Yes, the fun part it is to convert it into a format IOS will accept.  You can try:

    IP dhcp pool 0

    option 121 24.192.168.30 ip 192.168.10.1

    option 249 ip 24.192.168.30 92.168.10.1

    If this does not work, change the "intellectual property" for "hex" and each of your decimal byte converted to hexadecimal.

  • wrt160n with cisco pix and isa server 2004 config

    Hello

    I am installing a configuration to which my wrt160n router should work, but it is not at present

    .. the is the problem:

    Internet proxy - pix cisco - ms isa 2004 - 4 network cards <> lan1, lan2, dmz and wlan networks

    The wlan network card will only be my lan wireless for internet access interface. The isa server wireless lan nic has been configurered with an IP 10.0.10.1. / 24

    Configure the interface to internet wrt160n with static ip 10.0.10.2 / 24 and bridge 10.0.10.1 2 i'net addresses of dns.

    My dhcp server config is 192.168.100.x /255.255.255.0 and the same dns addresses i'net 2. NAT is disabled because isa server nat for all networks

    where is mistaken or do I forgot something... Help, please

    Activate NAT on the WRT or add a static route for 192.168.100.0/255.255.255.0 to 10.0.10.2 on your isa server computer.

    Of course, you only want wireless, there is not need to use the WRT as a router. You can set the WRT back to DHCP on internet settings. Set the address LAN IP of 10.0.10.2 with a mask of 255.255.255.0. Disable the DHCP server on the WRT. Then one of the LAN wire ports of the WRT to the ISA Server. Do not use the internet port on the WRT!

    Now, you have configured the WRT as simple access point. So you should use your ISA Server to serve DHCP IP addresses inside 10.0.10.0/24...

  • Remote access VPN with ASA 5510 by using the DHCP server

    Hello

    Can someone please share your knowledge to help me find out why I'm not able to receive an IP address on the remote access VPN connection so that I can get an IP local pool DHCP?

    I'm trying to set up remote access VPN with ASA 5510. It works with dhcp local pool but does not seem to work when I tried to use an existing DHCP server. It is tested in an internal network as follows:

    !

    ASA Version 8.2 (5)

    !

    interface Ethernet0/1

    nameif inside

    security-level 100

    IP 10.6.0.12 255.255.254.0

    !

    IP local pool testpool 10.6.240.150 - 10.6.240.159 a mask of 255.255.248.0. (worked with it)

    !

    Route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.6.0.1 1

    !

    Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac FirstSet

    life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

    Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association

    Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 1jeu transform-set FirstSet

    dynamic mymap 1 dyn1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

    mymap map crypto inside interface

    crypto ISAKMP allow inside

    crypto ISAKMP policy 1

    preshared authentication

    3des encryption

    sha hash

    Group 2

    life 43200

    !

    VPN-addr-assign aaa

    VPN-addr-assign dhcp

    !

    internal group testgroup strategy

    testgroup group policy attributes

    DHCP-network-scope 10.6.192.1

    enable IPSec-udp

    IPSec-udp-port 10000

    !

    username testlay password * encrypted

    !

    tunnel-group testgroup type remote access

    tunnel-group testgroup General attributes

    strategy-group-by default testgroup

    DHCP-server 10.6.20.3

    testgroup group tunnel ipsec-attributes

    pre-shared key *.

    !

    I got following output when I test connect to the ASA with Cisco VPN client 5.0

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: (4) SA (1) + KE + NUNCIO (10) + ID (5), HDR + VENDO

    4024 bytesR copied in 3,41 0 seconds (1341 by(tes/sec) 13) of the SELLER (13) seller (13) + the SELLER (13), as well as the SELLER (13) ++ (0) NONE total length: 853

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, SA payload processing

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, processing ke payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing ISA_KE

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, nonce payload processing

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing ID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, received xauth V6 VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, DPD received VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, received Fragmentation VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE Peer included IKE fragmentation capability flags: Main Mode: real aggressive Mode: false

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, received NAT-Traversal worm 02 VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: IP = 10.15.200.108, the customer has received Cisco Unity VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, connection landed on tunnel_group testgroup

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA payload processing

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA proposal # 1, turn # 9 entry overall IKE acceptable matches # 1

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build the payloads of ISAKMP security

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, building ke payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, building nonce payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, Generating keys for answering machine...

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, construction of payload ID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash for ISAKMP

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of Cisco Unity VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing payload V6 VID xauth

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, building dpd vid payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing the payload of the NAT-Traversal VID ver 02

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, NAT-discovery payload construction

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, NAT-discovery payload construction

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, construction of Fragmentation VID + load useful functionality

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, send Altiga/Cisco VPN3000/Cisco ASA GW VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR SA (1) KE (4) NUNCIO (10) + ID (5) + HASH (8) + SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) + the SELLER (13) NAT - D (130) + NAT - D (130) of the SELLER (13) + the seller (13) + NONE (0) total length: 440

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 0) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + NAT - D (130) + NAT - D (130) of the SELLER (13) + the seller (13) + NONE (0) overall length: 168

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash for ISAKMP

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing notify payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload NAT-discovery of treatment

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload NAT-discovery of treatment

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, calculation of hash discovered NAT

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, useful treatment IOS/PIX Vendor ID (version: 1.0.0 capabilities: 00000408)

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, payload processing VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, the customer has received Cisco Unity VID

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, I

    [OK]

    KenS-mgmt-012 # P = 10.15.200.108, status of automatic NAT detection: remote end is NOT behind a NAT device this end is NOT behind a NAT device

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, empty building hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash qm

    Jan 16 15:39:21 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = d4ca48e4) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 72

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = d4ca48e4) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 87

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): enter!

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, IP = 10.15.200.108, transformation MODE_CFG response attributes.

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: primary DNS = authorized

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: secondary DNS = authorized

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: = authorized primary WINS

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: = authorized secondary WINS

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: Compression IP = disabled

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: Split Tunneling political = disabled

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: setting Proxy browser = no - modify

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKEGetUserAttributes: browser Local Proxy bypass = disable

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, (testlay) the authenticated user.

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, empty building hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash qm

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 6b1b471) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 64

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 6b1b471) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + NONE (0) overall length: 60

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): enter!

    Jan 16 15:39:26 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, cfg ACK processing attributes

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = 49ae1bb8) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + ATTR (14) + (0) NONE total length: 182

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, process_attr(): enter!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, treatment cfg request attributes

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the IPV4 address!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the IPV4 network mask!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for DNS server address.

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the address of the WINS server.

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, transaction mode attribute unhandled received: 5

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the banner!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for setting save PW!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: receipt of request for default domain name!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for Split-Tunnel list!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for split DNS!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for PFS setting!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the Proxy Client browser setting!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the list of backup peer ip - sec!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for setting disconnect from the Client Smartcard Removal!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the Version of the Application.

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, Type of Client: Windows NT Client Application Version: 5.0.07.0440

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for FWTYPE!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: request received for the DHCP for DDNS hostname is: DEC20128!

    Jan 16 15:39:27 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, MODE_CFG: application received for the UDP Port!

    Jan 16 15:39:32 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, in double Phase 2 detected packets.  No last packet retransmit.

    Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE RECEIPT Message (msgid = b04e830f) with payloads: HDR + HASH (8) + NOTIFY (11) + (0) NONE total length: 84

    Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, processing notify payload

    Jan 16 15:39:37 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, in double Phase 2 detected packets.  No last packet retransmit.

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE has received the response from type [] at the request of the utility of IP address

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, cannot get an IP address for the remote peer

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, case of mistaken IKE TM V6 WSF (struct & 0xd8030048) , : TM_DONE, EV_ERROR--> TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_IP_FAIL--> TM_BLD_REPLY NullEvent--> TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_GET_IP--> TM_BLD_REPLY, EV_NEED_IP--> TM_WAIT_REQ, EV_PROC_MSG--> TM_WAIT_REQ, EV_HASH_OK--> TM_WAIT_REQ, NullEvent

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, case of mistaken IKE AM Responder WSF (struct & 0xd82b6740) , : AM_DONE, EV_ERROR--> AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG_V6H, EV_TM_FAIL--> AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG_V6H NullEvent--> AM_TM_INIT_MODECFG, EV_WAIT--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_CHECK_QM_MSG--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_TM_XAUTH_OK--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H NullEvent--> AM_TM_INIT_XAUTH_V6H, EV_ACTIVATE_NEW_SA

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE SA AM:bd3a9a4b ending: 0x0945c001, refcnt flags 0, tuncnt 0

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, sending clear/delete with the message of reason

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, empty building hash payload

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, constructing the payload to delete IKE

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = testgroup, Username = testlay, IP = 10.15.200.108, build payloads of hash qm

    Jan 16 15:39:39 [IKEv1]: IP = 10.15.200.108, IKE_DECODE SEND Message (msgid = 9de30522) with payloads: HDR HASH (8) + DELETE (12) + (0) NONE total length: 80

    Kind regards

    Lay

    For the RADIUS, you need a definition of server-aaa:

    Protocol AAA - NPS RADIUS server RADIUS

    AAA-server RADIUS NPS (inside) host 10.10.18.12

    key *.

    authentication port 1812

    accounting-port 1813

    and tell your tunnel-group for this server:

    General-attributes of VPN Tunnel-group

    Group-NPS LOCAL RADIUS authentication server

    --
    Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
    http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

  • Cisco Aironet 2600 series Configuration of the DHCP server is NOT serving addresses?

    Cisco Aironet 2600 series Configuration of the DHCP server is NOT serving addresses?

    I have (2) AIR-SAP2602I-A-K9, configured the same way.

    on two different remote LANs.

    They don't seem to be handing out addresses via DHCP.

    {If I connect to a local network with another DHCP server}

    wireless devices can obtain addresses

    This another DHCP server on the LAN through the access point.}

    I followed 12.4.25d. JA.cg.pdf

    Configuration of the Access Point to provide the Service DHCP 5-22

    ---------|---------|---------|

    e.g. 3444-RCS1-AN #show running-config

    Building configuration...

    version 15.2

    3444-RCS1-YEAR host name

    no ip Routing

    USH - DM IP domain name

    DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.29.89

    IP dhcp RCS1 pool

    network 192.168.29.88 255.255.255.248

    router by default - 192.168.28.1

    Rental 1 0

    interface BVI1

    IP 192.168.28.211 255.255.254.0

    no ip route cache

    default IP gateway - 192.168.28.1

    ---------|---------|---------|

    ---------|---------|---------|

    e.g. 3444-RCS2-AN #show running-config

    Building configuration...

    version 15.2

    3444-RCS2-YEAR host name

    no ip Routing

    USH - DM IP domain name

    DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.129.81

    IP dhcp RCS2 pool

    network 192.168.129.80 255.255.255.248

    router by default - 192.168.128.1

    Rental 2 0

    interface BVI1

    IP 192.168.128.171 255.255.254.0

    no ip route cache

    default IP gateway - 192.168.128.1

    ---------|---------|---------|

    Thats the DHCP Pool range 192.168.29.88 through 192.168.28.95

    Well this will confuse your customers.

    And this is NOT how to set up your "range".   See below:

    DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.29.1 192.168.29.87

    DHCP excluded-address IP 192.168.29.96 192.168.29.254

    IP dhcp RCS1 pool

    network 192.168.28.211 255.255.254.0

    router by default - 192.168.28.1

    Rental 1 0

  • Start the server wds with cisco dhcp server

    Salvation;

    I want to use the cisco dhcp server and I do not know which option I need to put my dhcp server

    Tanx

    You must contact Cisco support to help them with their product.

  • Help setting up a laboratory at home using Cisco kit and a blank Superhub

    Hello world

    I just started my CCENT class and so I try to create a laboratory that is separate from my LAN House, initially using a blank Superhub and a Cisco 1841 router.  Please keep in mind that I am a beginner, so it may not make sense or be completely illogical...

    The superhub for those who don't know, is a renamed netgear, limit VMDG480.  It's basically a cable modem and router wireless combined.

    The normal daily LAN side of the network was the default installation to receive an IP address via DHCP from the superhub in range 192.168.0.1/24.

    At first, I thought I could put things in preparation for my lab installation, by configuring the LAN subnet using 192.168.0.0 and superhub of/16 mask rank for my 'everyday' network and 192.168.1.0 rank for my "laboratory at home." (Good or bad?...)

    Unfortunately, I'm unable to do so because the superhub only allows the last byte in the mask to be changed, so I changed the mask and it now reads 255.255.255.128, with the idea that I can always have 2 separate networks.

    In the photo above you can see devices on the right side are all directly related to the superhub and continue to work as usual.

    On the left side is where I've implemented a Cisco 1841 router and a laptop computer to test.

    The details of each device are;

    Blank Superhub
    LAN:192.168.0.1
    The DHCP scope: 192.168.0.2 - 192.168.0.126

    Cisco 1841
    Fast Ethernet 0/1: 192.168.0.126
    255.255.255.128

    Fast Ethernet 0/0: 192.168.0.129
    255.255.255.128

    PC2 (mobile wired connected to FE 0/0)
    IP: 192.168.0.200
    255.255.255.128
    Default gateway: 192.168.0.126 (the address IP of Cisco 1841)

    Someone would be kind enough to look at this and tell me where I'm wrong please?

    I thought about pulling the superhub completely, but I am bound to her by my ISP :(

    Hello

    It of a little early in your studies for this :) but implementation of your knees it should work:

    1841 router:

    int fa0/0 (interface connected to the hub)
    IP 192.168.0.126 255.255.255.0
    NAT outside IP
    No tap

    int fa0/1.2
    encapsulaton dot1q 2
    IP 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0
    IP nat inside
    No tap

    int fa0/1 (interface connected to)
    No tap

    NAT configuration:

    access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255
    IP nat inside source list 1 interface fa0/0 overload

    Add a default route:
    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 (so your router knows where to forward DNS queries to 8.8.8.8)

    Connect your 3560 to the second port on the router and configure a trunk on the switch port and add vlan 2:

    int fa0/0 (connected to the 1841 router)
    switch to trunk encapsulation dot1q
    mode trunk switch

    VLAN 2
    name Home_Lab

    Connect your PC to the second switchport and add vlan2:

    int fa0/1
    access mode switch
    access switch vlan 2
    No tap

    Finally, give your PC an address in the subnet of vlan 2:

    IP: 172.16.0.2
    Mask: 255.255.0.0
    Gateway: 172.16.0.1
    DNS: 8.8.8.8

    You should be able to ping the address of the router on the subnet in 172.16.x.x 192.x.x.x. I don't have a Virgin hub to test this, but it worked well with two 1841 routers.

  • Cisco ISE synchronization and NTP server

    I am currently implementing Cisco ISE to our customer.

    But having a little problem Cisco ISE cannot synchronize with NTP server.

    Keep in mind, NTP servers in AD.

    Currently, Cisco ISE synchronize just at the local level.

    Cisco ISE implemented distributed mode, when there are two Cisco ISE installed on VMware (Administration & monitoring primary & secondary node), and another is the device (political Service node).

    As a result of it might not sync server NTP and the ISE of Cisco, Cisco ISE often OUT-OF-SYN.

    Is there a solution for this problem?

    Gandhi,

    This is a known issue, I have crossed upwards and have not read that you use AD as your NTP server, there have been problems with integration of the ISE and ACS with AD as their ntp source, please use another device like sources ntp, for example a router.

    Thank you

    Tarik Admani
    * Please note the useful messages *.

  • Cisco 2611 router and RADIUS

    Greetings. First of all, let me start by saying that I am a fool, I know I am a fool and I apologize for wasting everyone's time. In fact, I do RTFM, RTFMs a lot, and I've yet to find a resolution.

    Secondly, I am setting up a RADIUS server in my test network. I installed Yopougon RADIUS on a Windows 2000 System. I have the following Setup on my Cisco 2611 router:

    With the help of 2297 off 29688 bytes

    !

    ! 17:20:27 PDT configuration was last modified Tuesday, May 20, 2008

    ! NVRAM config update at 17:20:29 PDT Tuesday, May 20, 2008

    !

    version 12.1

    no single-slot-reload-enable service

    horodateurs service debug datetime localtime show-timezone msec

    Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec

    encryption password service

    !

    host Tester name

    !

    logging buffered debugging 10000

    AAA new-model

    RADIUS AAA server group RadiusServers

    ACCT-port of the server 172.26.0.2 auth-port 1812 1813

    !

    Group AAA authentication login default local RadiusServers

    AAA authentication login local localauth

    AAA authentication ppp default if necessary to group local RADIUS

    AAA authorization exec default local radius group

    RADIUS AAA authorization network default local group

    AAA accounting delay start

    start-stop radius group AAA accounting exec by default

    start-stop radius group AAA accounting network default

    AAA process 6

    Select the secret xxx

    !

    test username password xxx

    !

    clock timezone PST - 8

    clock summer-time recurring PDT

    IP subnet zero

    no ip domain-lookup

    !

    no ip bootp Server

    !

    interface Loopback0

    the IP 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0

    !

    interface Ethernet0/0

    Description for the main network

    address IP X.X.X.X 255.255.255.128

    no ip redirection

    no ip unreachable

    no ip proxy-arp

    NAT outside IP

    full-duplex

    No cdp enable

    !

    interface Ethernet0/1

    Description of network internal

    IP 172.26.0.1 255.255.255.0

    no ip redirection

    no ip unreachable

    no ip proxy-arp

    IP nat inside

    load-interval 30

    full-duplex

    No cdp enable

    !

    IP nat pool test X.X.X.X-X.X.X.X netmask 255.255.255.128

    IP nat inside source list 3 pool overload test

    IP nat inside destination list 3 pool test

    IP classless

    IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 X.X.X.X

    no ip address of the http server

    !

    radius of the source interface Ethernet0/1 IP

    access-list 3 permit 172.26.0.0 0.0.0.255

    not run cdp

    public RO 15 SNMP-server community

    secret key of acct-port 1812 auth-172.26.0.2 - RADIUS server host port 1813

    RADIUS server retransmit 3

    key secret RADIUS server

    !

    Line con 0

    password xxx

    Synchronous recording

    line to 0

    line vty 0 4

    access-class 10

    1234567890 7 password

    Synchronous recording

    !

    NTP-period clock 17208108

    Server NTP 192.43.244.18

    end

    My RADIUS server is in place and respond to queries, but my router does not seem to be transferring applications to authenticate to it. In fact, when I connect to the router using HyperTerminal, it expires, and I find myself authenticate locally.

    I don't really like if my Cisco equipment authenticates with the RADIUS server, but I have to get set up to authenticate my users so that I can follow their time online. What I missed in my router configuration? Therefore no transfer requests to the RADIUS Server user authentication.

    Thanks for any assistance, you may be able to provide.

    If you explore the authentication Proxy and it works, it could make you forget the PPPoE fast enough.

    If you decide to pursue PPPoE, the following link is probably where you will find most of the information on the configuration of Cisco PPPoE:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk175/tk819/tsd_technology_support_protocol_home.html

    "Providers" of Cisco forums could provide some guidance if PPPoE is achievable with your platform and environment?

Maybe you are looking for