Using the merge statement on support-compatible version table time invalid

Hello
just a simple question: is it possible to use a merge statement on a table of valid time support-compatible version?

For the next test, I get an ORA-01733.
(t1 is the version table compatible with time valid support t1 and t2 have the same structure: two fields: NAME and CODE (pk))

merge into < table1 > t1
with the help of < table2 > t2
on (t1. CODE = t2. CODE)
when matched, THEN update set t1.NAME = t1.NAME
where <>t1.NAME, t2.NAME;

Thank you

Hello

The sql merge operation does not currently work with versioned tables, with or without validtime. The optimizer of the merger results in insert/update statements on the underlying table for the _LT. As a result, instead of triggers that are created during the enableversioning are never triggered.

Kind regards
Ben

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

Different result by using the MERGE statement

I have 2 SQL statements:
MERGE INTO PT_CQS_AGGR APC
With the HELP of PT_CQS_AGGR_TEMP Lady
WE (concat (concat(pca.from_city_id,pca.to_city_id), pca.query_timestamp_hh) = concat (concat(pcah.from_city_id,pcah.to_city_id), pcah.query_timestamp_hh))
WHEN MATCHED THEN
Setting a DAY SET pca.search_count = pca.search_count + pcah.search_count
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
VALUES of INSERTION (to_city_id, query_timestamp_hh, from_city_id, search_count) (pcah.from_city_id, pcah.to_city_id, pcah.query_timestamp_hh, pcah.search_count);
AND
MERGE INTO PT_CQS_AGGR APC
With the HELP of PT_CQS_AGGR_TEMP Lady
WE (pca.from_city_id = pcah.from_city_id AND pca.to_city_id = pcah.to_city_id AND pca.query_timestamp_hh = pcah.query_timestamp_hh)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
Setting a DAY SET pca.search_count = pca.search_count + pcah.search_count
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
VALUES of INSERTION (to_city_id, query_timestamp_hh, from_city_id, search_count) (pcah.from_city_id, pcah.to_city_id, pcah.query_timestamp_hh, pcah.search_count);
First statement correctly the merged data, but use FULL TABLE SCANS, so it's rather slow. Second statement using a UNIQUE INDEX on the columns from_city_id, to_city_id, and query_timestamp_hh on the MAP of EXPLAIN, but during the execution of I've got ORA-00001: unique constraint (PODOWNER. IDX_CQS_AGGR_3COL) violated. What is the problem with the second statement - especially with this line:
WE (pca.from_city_id = pcah.from_city_id AND pca.to_city_id = pcah.to_city_id AND pca.query_timestamp_hh = pcah.query_timestamp_hh)
Can I use a more complex condition in the MERGE statement? Because it seems that not all the conditions have been taken...
???

Select pcah.from_city_id, pcah.to_city_id, PT_CQS_AGGR_TEMP Lady pcah.query_timestamp_hh

less

Select pca.from_city_id, pca.to_city_id, pca.query_timestamp_hh PT_CQS_AGGR pca

somewhere the conditions limiting the time.

(or whatever the columns make up the stress of failing)

In addition, select for each column in the constraint of failure where the column is null. If one of these columns is null, equality fails, even if both are null, because null <> null. So you will get a "no match" if all values are the same and it is set to null.

Edit: Oh, slap forehead, that is why one works and the complete analysis. As SomeoneElse said, it normalizes the type of data and concatenates, comparison null to no effect and refusing all usual index.

Error in the Merge statement using dblink

Hello
I am facing the following error when you use the merge statement using the dblink.
ORA-02069: global_names must be set to true for this operation parameter.
I can use the same dblink in my select insert and update statements but when I try to use merge then he invites the error said, is also not any syntax error as same statement can be used on the same tables of database instead of dblink.
Please suggest any help will be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance

Hi Aqeel

If insert and update statements work well through links db, then it should not be a problem with the merge statement. But if you are faced with the question, so please check the entire sql statement with tnsnames on both sides. Please share the tnsnames for the two dbs with dblink ddl.

Concerning

Jihane Narain Sylca

When using the merge and when to use updated

Hi friends,
Given the best performance... purpose of this discussion is when we should use statement UPDATE and when we should use MERGE statement in oracle update of thousands of records.
Kindly Guide.
Kind regards
Himanshu

Hello

Looking for a couple to a few rules that you can use to decide whether to use the MERGE or UPDATE, without actually testing two meanings?

If so, use MERGE when

(1) (sometimes) need to add new lines

(2) it is simpler. This includes special cases

(2A) an UPDATE statement uses a subquery in the SET clause and then (mostly) repeats the same subquery in the WHERE clause

(2B) you want to use the analytical functions or CONNECT BY in a subquery

These rules are NOT guaranteed to work in all situations.

Kimmy says:

Hello

... My requirement is only UPDATED records about 200 to 500K (NOT followed by update of insertion).

So the rule (1) above does not apply in this case.

What I observed in the update using a MERGE statement and UPDATE is:

Update with the MERGER was faster however explain the bytes consumed to the query plan MERGE has been compared more update.

Use the tool that works best for your needs. If users are complaining that something shows more bytes used in a plan to explain, so maybe it's a reason for the UPDATE.

Where I work, where is the fastest is usually more important.

In addition, I want to get clearity

1. "if I should use MERGE if I need to update recrods using the unique table" as shown below: OR update will be good to use in this case:

MERGE INTO MKT_DATA inmkt

C using (SELECT Customer_Code, region, State OF CUSTOMER_DATA)

ON (inmkt. Distributor_Code = c.Customer_Code AND inmkt. DISTRIBUTOR_CODE IS NOT NULL)

WHEN MATCHED THEN

Updated the inmkt VALUE. Distributor_Region = c.Region,

inmkt. C.State = Distributor_Province;

UPDATE MKT_DATA inmkt

SET (inmkt. Distributor_Region, inmkt. Distributor_Province) =

(SELECT c.Region, c.State OF CUSTOMER_DATA c

WHERE c.Customer_Code = inmkt. Distributor_Code)

WHERE inmkt. DISTRIBUTOR_CODE IS NOT NULL;

2 statements above are not equivalent.

The UPDATE statement changes all the lines in the table mkt_data that have a distributor_code, this distributor_code be in the table customer_data or not.

You want something that is equivalent to the MERGE statement, you can use:

UPDATE MKT_DATA inmkt

SET (inmkt. Distributor_Region, inmkt. Distributor_Province) =

(SELECT c.Region, c.State

OF CUSTOMER_DATA c

WHERE c.Customer_Code = inmkt. Distributor_Code

)

WHERE THERE ARE

(SELECT 1

CUSTOMER_DATA C2

WHERE the c2. Customer_Code = inmkt. Distributor_Code

)

;

It basically uses the same auxiliary request 2 times (article 2 (a), so I would use MERGE if these are the results I wanted.

If you have a foreign key constraint, which ensures that each distributor_code in mkt_data will match a line in customer_data, then the 2 statements above will produce the same results. In this case, I find the UPDATE statement simpler and probably use it rather than MERGE.

2. to Updating huge amount of records MERGER must be used instead of update?

I don't know of all short reign as the "use X whenever you have more than 100,000 lines".

3. If in the update, I need to use several tables then I have to use MERGE?

MERGE IN MKT_DATA2 t

WITH THE HELP OF)

SELECT DISTINCT srt. Sales_Id, tmkt. Cust_Code, srt. PRODUCT_CENTER

OF srt, CUSTOMER_DATA c, MKT_DATA2 tmkt SALESTERR_PL

WHERE tmkt.state_Id = 10423

AND tmkt. Business = 'MARKETING'

AND c.CUST_CODE = tmkt. Cust_Code

AND c.Rollup_Code = srt. CUST_CODE

AND srt. PRODUCT_CENTER = tmkt.PL

) d

WE (t.state_Id = 10423

AND t.BA = 'MARKETING'

AND t.Cust_Code = d.Cust_Code

AND t.PL = d.PRODUCT_CENTER

AND t.Cust_Code IS NOT NULL

)

WHEN MATCHED THEN

UPDATE SET t.Sales_Id = d.Sales_Id;

UPDATE MKT_DATA2 tmkt

SET Sales_Id = (SELECT SALES_ID OF SALESTERR_PL srt

WHERE the srt. CUST_CODE = (SELECT ROLLUP_CODE FROM CUSTOMER_DATA c

WHERE c.CUSTOMER_CODE = tmkt. Cust_Code)

AND srt. PRODUCT_CENTER = tmkt.PL)

WHERE business = 'MARKETING'

AND state_Id = 10423;

Once again, those who are not equivalent. The UPDATE statement can change more lines than the MERGE statement.

In addition, you can use the MERGE statement:

MERGE IN MKT_DATA2 t

WITH THE HELP OF)

SELECT DISTINCT srt. Sales_Id, tmkt. Cust_Code, srt. PRODUCT_CENTER

OF srt, CUSTOMER_DATA c, MKT_DATA2 tmkt SALESTERR_PL

WHERE tmkt.state_Id = 10423

AND tmkt. Business = 'MARKETING'

AND c.CUST_CODE = tmkt. Cust_Code

AND c.Rollup_Code = srt. CUST_CODE

AND srt. PRODUCT_CENTER = tmkt.PL

) d

WE (t.Cust_Code = d.Cust_Code

AND t.PL = d.PRODUCT_CENTER

)

WHEN MATCHED THEN

UPDATE SET t.Sales_Id = d.Sales_Id

WHERE t.state_Id = 10423

AND t.BA = 'MARKETING'

- AND t.Cust_Code IS NOT NULL - does not need, said subquery 'c.CUST_CODE = tmkt. Cust_Code ".

;

If you would care to publish the sample data, I was able to test this.

4. when the UPDATE is preferred over the MERGER?

In simple cases, including situations where all you need to know are on the line itself, such as:

UPDATE emp

SET sal = sal * 1.05

Job WHERE NOT IN ('MANAGER', 'PRÉSIDENT')

;

Get error in the merge statement

Version of Oracle, Oracle Database 11g Express Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
Hi gurus
I am trying to perform the merge statement using the clause, but I get the error message, see below my sample data:
Examples of data
DROP TABLE OF BILLING;
DROP TABLE GROUP_MST;
DROP TABLE age_max;
CREATE ARRAY OF BILLING
(
BILLING_ID NUMBER (5),
RATE NUMBER (5),
MAXIMUM_AGE NUMBER (5),
package_id NUMBER (5)
);
INSERT
IN BILLING
(SELECT 11,1,10,100 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT 12,2,15,100 FROM DUAL
UNION ALL
SELECT 13,3,20,100 FROM DUAL
);
CREATE TABLE GROUP_MST
(group_number NUMBER (5), package_id NUMBER (5))
);
INSERT INTO GROUP_MST
(SELECT DOUBLE 5 000 100
);
-------
CREATE TABLE AGE_MAX
(group_number NUMBER (5), max_age NUMBER (5))
);
INSERT
IN AGE_MAX
(SELECT 5000,60 FROM DUAL
);
Merge statement
MERGE INTO DRC USING billing
(WITH datum1 AS
(SELECT A.group_number,
b.billing_id,
b.rate,
b.maximum_age,
b.package_id
OF group_mst A,.
b billing
WHERE A.package_id = b.package_id
),
datum2 AS
(SELECT max_age, group_number FROM age_max
)
SELECT * FROM A, b WHERE A.group_number = b.group_number datum2 datum1
)
CBC ON (drc.billing_id = src.billing_id)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET drc.maximum_age = src.max_age - 1;
Error
Error from the 33 in the command line:
MERGE INTO DRC USING billing
(WITH datum1 AS
(SELECT A.group_number,
b.billing_id,
b.rate,
b.maximum_age,
b.package_id
OF group_mst A,.
b billing
WHERE A.package_id = b.package_id
),
datum2 AS
(SELECT max_age, group_number FROM age_max
)
SELECT * FROM A, b WHERE A.group_number = b.group_number datum2 datum1
)
CBC ON (drc.billing_id = src.billing_id)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET drc.maximum_age = src.max_age - 1
Error in the command line: 50 column: 1
Error report:
SQL error: ORA-00918: column ambiguously defined
00918 00000 - "ambiguously defined column.
* Cause:
* Action:
Thanks in advance
Concerning
Shu

WITH datum1 AS (SELECT A.group_number,

b.billing_id,

b.rate,

b.maximum_age,

b.package_id

OF group_mst A, b billing

WHERE A.package_id = b.package_id),

datum2 AS (SELECT max_age, group_number FROM age_max)

SELECT A.*, b.max_age, b.group_number as group_number_b - ERROR HERE

OF datum1 A, b datum2

WHERE A.group_number = b.group_number

Return in the MERGE statement clause

Hello

I use Oracle 10 g Version

I tried the code using UPDATE with return Clause & MERGER with return below Clause.

I have not found ANY error while working with the UPDATE statement. Here is the code with the UPDATE statement

DECLARE
   TYPE empno_list IS TABLE OF emp.empno%TYPE;
   vempno_list   empno_list;
BEGIN
      UPDATE emp
         SET comm = 11
       WHERE deptno IN (SELECT deptno FROM dept)
   RETURNING empno
        BULK COLLECT INTO vempno_list;
   FOR i IN vempno_list.FIRST .. vempno_list.LAST
   LOOP
      DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('Values of EMP ' || vempno_list (i));
   END LOOP;
END;

But PL/SQL error: ORA-00933: SQL not correctly completed command when you work with the MERGE statement

declare 
 type empno_list  is  table of emp.empno%type;
 vempno_list empno_list;
begin                
   merge into emp tgt 
      using dept src
        on (src.deptno =tgt.deptno)
        when matched then 
         update set tgt.comm=12
       returning tgt.empno bulk collect into vempno_list ;
       
        for i in vempno_list.first .. vempno_list.last loop
                dbms_output.put_line('Values of EMP '||vempno_list(i) ) ;
        end loop;
end;

Please suggest me

Probably because BACK IN clause does not belong to the MERGE statement. It is available only for INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE. Here's the quote from Oracle Documentation:

The static method RETURNING INTO article belongs to a DELETE , INSERT , or UPDATE statement. The dynamic RETURNING INTO article belongs to a EXECUTE IMMEDIATE statement.

And here is the link.

Back IN the Clause

It will be useful.

Ishan

Problem in the Merge statement
Hi all

I use the merge updated statement 30000 records of tables having 55 records of Lakes.
But it takes a lot of time as I kill the session after 12 hours, as it was still ongoing.

So, the same day I m using cursors, it will end in less than 3 hours.

I used merge is: -.

MERGE IN Table1 a
USING (SELECT MAX (TO_DATE (TO_CHAR (contact_date, "dd/mm/yyyy")
|| contact_time,
"jj/mm/aaaa HH24:Mi:SS".
)
) m_condate,.
appl_id
FROM Table2 b,.
(SELECT DISTINCT acc_no acc_no
IN table 3, Table1
WHERE acc_no = appl_id AND delinquent_flag = 'Y '.
AND financier_id = 'NEWACLOS') d
WHERE d.acc_no = b.appl_id
AND (contacted_by IS NOT NULL
OR followup_branch_code IS NOT NULL
)
GROUP BY appl_id) c
WE (a.appl_id = c.appl_id AND a.delinquent_flag = 'Y')
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE
SET last_contact_date = c.m_condate;

In this query, table 1 has 30000 documents and table 2 and table 3 have records 3670955 and 555674 respectively.

Please suggest, what I'm doing wrong with merger, because according to my understanding merge statement is much better than the updates or updates using cursors.

Required info is as follows:

SQL > show the user_dump_dest parameter

VALUE OF TYPE NAME
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
user_dump_dest string/opt/oracle/admin/FINCLUAT/udu
MP
SQL > show parameter optimizer

VALUE OF TYPE NAME
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ integer 100
the string ALL_ROWS optimizer_mode
optimizer_secure_view_merging Boolean TRUE
SQL > show parameter db_file_multi

VALUE OF TYPE NAME
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
db_file_multiblock_read_count integer 16
SQL > show parameter db_block_size

VALUE OF TYPE NAME
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
Whole DB_BLOCK_SIZE 8192
SQL > column sname format a20
SQL > column pname format a20
SQL > column pval2 format a20
SQL > select
2 sname,
3 pname,
pval1 4,.
5 pval2
6 of
7 sys.aux_stats$;
sys.aux_stats$
*
ERROR on line 7:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

Elapsed time: 00:00:00.05
SQL > explain the plan for
2 - Put your statement here
3 MERGE IN one cs_case_info
4 USE (SELECT MAX (TO_DATE (TO_CHAR (contact_date, "dd/mm/yyyy")
5                          || contact_time,
6 'dd/mm/yyyy HH24:Mi:SS.
7                          )
(8) m_condate,
9 appl_id
CS_CASE_DETAILS_ACLOS 10 b,
11 (SELECT DISTINCT acc_no acc_no
12 OF NEWACLOS_RESEARCH_HIST_AYLA, cs_case_info
13 WHERE acc_no = appl_id AND delinquent_flag = 'Y '.
14 AND financier_id = "NEWACLOS") d
15 WHERE d.acc_no = b.appl_id
16 AND (contacted_by IS NOT NULL
17 GOLD followup_branch_code IS NOT NULL
18                )
C 19 GROUP BY appl_id)
20. WE (a.appl_id = c.appl_id AND a.delinquent_flag = 'Y')
21. WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE 22
23 SET last_contact_date = c.m_condate
24;

He explained.

Elapsed time: 00:00:00.08
SQL > select * from table (dbms_xplan.display);

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | TempSpc | Cost (% CPU).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 2 > MERGE STATEMENT | 47156 | 874K | 128K (1) |
| 1. MERGE | CS_CASE_INFO |
| 2. VIEW |
| 3. HASH JOIN | 47156 | 36 M | 5672K | 128K (1) |
| 4. VIEW | 47156 | 5111K | 82339 (1) |
| 5. GROUP SORT BY | 47156 | 4236K | 298 M | 82339 (1) |
| 6. HASH JOIN | 2820K | 247 M | 10 M | 60621 (1) |
| 7. HASH JOIN | 216K | 7830K | 6985 (1) |
| 8. VIEW | the index $ _join$ _012 | 11033. 258K | 1583 (1) |
| 9. HASH JOIN |
| 10. INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_CCI_DEL | 11033. 258K | 768 (1) |
| 11. INDEX RANGE SCAN | CS_CASE_INFO_UK | 11033. 258K | 821 (1) |
| 12. FULL RESTRICTED INDEX SCAN FAST | IDX_NACL_RSH_ACC_NO | 5539K | 68 M | 5382 (1) |
| 13. TABLE ACCESS FULL | CS_CASE_DETAILS_ACLOS | 3670K | 192 M | 41477 (1) |
| 14. TABLE ACCESS FULL | CS_CASE_INFO | 304K | 205 M | 35975 (1) |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note
-----
-"PLAN_TABLE' is old version

24 selected lines.

Elapsed time: 00:00:01.04
SQL > rollback;

Complete restoration.

Elapsed time: 00:00:00.03
SQL > set autotrace traceonly arraysize 100
SQL > alter session set events 10046 name context forever, trace level 8';
ERROR:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges

Elapsed time: 00:00:00.04
SQL > disconnect
Disconnected from the database to Oracle 10 g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production 64-bit
With partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
SQL > spool off

Published by: user4528984 on May 5, 2009 22:37
Create indexes for tables. CS_CASE_DETAILS_ACLOS, CS_CASE_INFO

also try to use the underside of suspicion

(SELECT / * + no_merge * / SEPARATE acc_no acc_no)
IN table 3, Table1

HTH

Question about the MERGE statement
Hi all

I have a small question... I can post code, table creation, etc... but I think this question can be able to be simply answered, if I explain it. If you want me to zip codes, etc... then just ask and I'll do it.

Here it goes:

I have a set up merge statement, and I have two columns. One is named ADD_DT, and the other is called LST_UPD_DT.

Update in the merge statement, the LST_UPD_DT column is updated with the SYSDATE.
When it is inserted in the merge statement, the ADD_DT column is updated with the SYSDATE.

So, here is my question:

Regardless of whether or not the information is updated, the LST_UPD_DT updates the SYSDATE every time. Any advice on how to update the LST_UPD_DT column only if information is changed/updated, so that the information is not changed would be not updated by the SYSDATE? I hope that this question was not too complicated.

Thank you all and if you want to see the code or examples of table... Please ask and I'll post one. I just thought that this may be able to meet without it.
Hello

991769 wrote:
OK, here's what the table looks like:

Thank you.
```
CREATE TABLE TBL_SUPPLIERS
(
SUPP_CD                 VARCHAR2(40 CHAR),
SUPP_NM                 VARCHAR2(255 CHAR),
ADD_DT                  VARCHAR2(50 CHAR),
LST_UPD_DT              VARCHAR2(50 CHAR))
```
Do not use a VARCHAR2 column for date information. Use a DATE column.
```
CREATE TABLE D_SUPPLIERS
(
SUPP_CD                 VARCHAR2(40 CHAR),
SUPP_NM                 VARCHAR2(255 CHAR))
```
```
INSERT INTO TBL_SUPPLIERS VALUES (1234, MINING, '03-26-2013 3:33:49 PM', '04-02-2013 9:04:52 AM');
INSERT INTO TBL_SUPPLIERS VALUES (2345, ELECTRIC, '03-26-2013 3:33:49 PM', '04-02-2013 9:04:52 AM');
INSERT INTO TBL_SUPPLIERS VALUES (3456, COAL, '03-26-2013 3:33:49 PM', '04-02-2013 9:04:52 AM');
```
You want people to view the solutions that actually work? Please make sure that your own instructions will actually work. Test and fix your code before posting.
All INSERT statements you posted fail; You seem to be missing single quotes around string literals. I think you meant:
```
INSERT INTO TBL_SUPPLIERS VALUES (1234, 'MINING', '03-26-2013 3:33:49 PM', '04-02-2013 9:04:52 AM');
...
```
Here's one way:
```
MERGE INTO  tbl_suppliers     sm
USING  (
           SELECT  d.*
        FROM              d_suppliers        d
        LEFT OUTER JOIN  tbl_suppliers  t  ON  t.supp_cd  = d.supp_cd
        WHERE   t.supp_cd                            IS NULL
        OR        DECODE (t.supp_nm, d.supp_nm, 0, 1) = 1
       )                       ds
ON     (sm.supp_cd = ds.supp_cd)
    WHEN MATCHED THEN
        UPDATE SET
            sm.supp_nm = ds.supp_nm,
            sm.lst_upd_dt = SYSDATE
    WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
        INSERT (sm.supp_cd, sm.supp_nm, sm.add_dt)
        VALUES
        (ds.supp_cd, ds.supp_nm, SYSDATE);

SELECT     *
FROM     tbl_suppliers
ORDER BY     SUPP_CD;
```
This can be more efficient, because it does not generate redo, or triggers, when two tables have exactly the same line.

Person registering in the Merge statement error!

Is it possible to save indivudual error in the MERGE statement (Update / Insert).
I'm unable to save these error. instead of MERGING, if I update the table in the cursor loop then I am able to record the individual error but the process takes time.
Thanks in advance.
Deba

Hi Deba,

Logging of DML errors:

SQL> create table tab1 (x number(1));

Table created.

SQL> exec dbms_errlog.create_error_log('tab1')

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL>
SQL> merge into tab1 t
  2        using (select 1 x from dual union all
  3               select 112 x from dual) s
  4  on (t.x = s.x)
  5  when not matched
  6  then insert (x) values (s.x)
  7  log errors into err$_tab1 reject limit unlimited;

1 row merged.

SQL>
SQL> COL x for 9999
SQL> select * from tab1;

    X
-----
    1

SQL> COL x for a4
SQL> select ora_err_number$, X from err$_tab1;

ORA_ERR_NUMBER$ X
--------------- ----
           1438 112

SQL>

Concerning
Peter

I have the table of 3 columns A, B, C. I want to store the sum of columns A B in the C column without using the DML statements. Can anyone help please how to do. ?

11.1 and especially you have virtual column

SQL> create table t
  2  (
  3     a number
  4   , b number
  5   , c generated always as (a+b) virtual
  6  );

Table created.

SQL> insert into t (a, b) values (1, 2);

1 row created.

SQL> select * from t;

         A          B          C
---------- ---------- ----------
         1          2          3

Before that, a front insert - trigger

SQL> create table t
  2  (
  3     a number
  4   , b number
  5   , c number
  6  );

Table created.

SQL> create or replace trigger t_default before insert on t for each row
  2  begin
  3    :new.c := :new.a+:new.b;
  4  end;
  5  /

Trigger created.

SQL> insert into t (a, b) values (1, 2);

1 row created.

SQL> select * from t;

         A          B          C
---------- ---------- ----------
         1          2          3

I use the current trial of Acrobat DC version. I opened a PDF I created in Corel Draw by publication in PDF format. I tried to copy and paste text from it to a Word 2007 document. The copy option was available, but when I went to the document and ch

I use the current trial of Acrobat DC version. I opened a PDF I created in Corel Draw by publication in PDF format. I tried to copy and paste text from it to a Word 2007 document. The copy option was available, but when I went to the document and chose paste, it was nothing. I then tried the same thing but sticking in a document of Corel. The same problem. It seems that the text has been copied, but I'm unable to paste it into another program. Is this real?

Is it permanently available text? (Can highlight you)?

This seems a strange way of working well - why not copied from the draw to Word?

Hairlines between Forms after using the merge tool (Pathfinder)

Hi all
I've got this camouflage complicated as the design of all kinds of forms, but only using 5 colors.
None of my items have traits.
I have selected and used the merge tool in the pathfinder (because I have to provide the document without forms overlapping).
When you look close to the result, you notice that there are some white hairlines around all forms.
This is really a deficiency, because if I slide a red rectangle behind the work, she appears in the hairlines.
I have read the other subjects 'loose' Illustrator here, but could not find a solution to my problem.
Thank you all in advance!

qrisqris,

It may be an artifact of the (reverse) screen.

What happens if you uncheck Edit > preferences > General > work of Anti-Aliasing?

And what happens if you save it as a PDF or print or save to the Web, or export to a raster format?

You would camouflage true if you could do the background shine through everything.

How to pass parameter in the function using the select statement?
Hello

I had a problem. I can't pass as parameter to the function by using the select statement. But it can pass as a parameter using the "code". How can I solve this problem?

For example,.
Select * from table (SplitFunction ('HS750020, HS750021')) < < < this work.

but

Select * from table (SplitFunction (select LOT_NO in the TRACER_SEARCH_SCHEDULE where JOB_ID = '36')) < < < do not work.

Thank you for trying to help him. Thank you.
Select * from table (SplitFunction (select LOT_NO in the TRACER_SEARCH_SCHEDULE where JOB_ID = '36'))< do="" not="">

Try like this
```
select * from table(select splitfunction(lot_no) from tracer_search_schedule where job_id='36')
```
Just make sure that your subquery returns only 1 row.

insert/update County in the merge statement
In the Merge statement, we can count the number of inserted rows and updated?

ROWCOUNT SQL % simply returns the number of rows merged.

It does not tell us the separately the line inserted and updated.
# To insert the rowcount is the number of inserted rows for update is the number of rows updated, for the merger, that's the number of merged lines.

Is there anyway that I can update all my devices. I do not use the Device Manager by clicking one at a time.

Is there anyway that I can update all my devices. I do not use the Device Manager by clicking one at a time.

I have windows vista 32 bit.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re-edit:-I do not use the Device Manager to find all my drivers and by clicking on each of them... one at a time update.

Y at - it another way to find and update the drivers at the same time and for free.

Your question is too terse and contains too little information for anyone to
help you. Read this article and try again:

http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/555375

Using the merge statement on support-compatible version table time invalid

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for