VCS and ports AD

Similar Questions

• Cisco VCS and LDAP for authentication of users

  I have a question about setting up LDAP for authentication of the user on the VCS. I want to have redundancy in my LDAP link. I believe that this is possible by setting a FULL domain name to the address of the LDAP server, then selecting a type of SRV resolution. What I'm not clear on is what the value for the server address would be if I used actually as SRV type of resolution. I should also add that I am looking to use TLS

  To clarify, if my AD domain name is myad.netcraftsmen.net. I have set the field as server address:

  myad.netcraftsmen.NET: assuming that VCS properly interrogate the DNS for the _service._proto correct parameters?

  or would I need to create an SRV record to that effect and set the field server address with the address (including the fields of _service._proto)

  or I need to specify one of the SRV records formats used by MS AD areas (there are several).

  If the latter, then what SRV record for TLS. I don't see records with port 389 (non-secure).

  My intuition tells me that this is probably the first option, but I could be far away.

  Anyway, thanks in advance for any input.

  Kind regards

  Bill

  Hi William,.

  I just checked it on a X6.1 VCS, and it seems that VCS searches SRV _ldap._tcp.domain (where 'domain' has been entered as the server address), both when the encryption is set to 'None' and 'TLS '.

  Hope this helps,

  Andreas

• Windows failed to update for HP - Bus USB and Ports, display controllers - HP w2408 widescreen LCD

  I have a new HP M9402 desktop with monitor Hp W2408 Summit.  I get a message to update windows for HP - Bus USB and Ports, display controllers - ACL from HP w2408 widescreen, but the windows download always fails.  I tried several times to download this update.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Hi all

  The solution to my problem of not being able to make updates to the window was to spend in an HDMI instead of VGA cable.

  BR / / JJG

• Complaint driver Lenovo G550 Wi - Fi and porting Windows 8.1

  Hello!

  This is my first post on this forum and I hope that I have the right place to post, as I've seen other topics concerning the g550 on this forum.

  I have read the discussions about the use of Windows 8 and its drivers and also problems with the wi - fi driver - it is the inability to provide a service of quality - problems with a "weak signal".

  Let me put it this way:

  1. at this moment I am Windows 7 64 bit and as my pilot wi - fi, I use the system planned when I installed it, it's:

  So far, it is the best WiFi driver available, that gets me the best discovery of network (I see on the 10 available wi - fi networks using this).

  2. to install the driver provided on the Lenovo Site's Driver, i.e. broadcom driver combined 32-bit/64-bit, the number of networks that I can connect to via wi - fi decreases from 10 to only 2 networks, one of them being my neighbor router! This is unacceptable in my opinion! Now, the speed of the network cannot deviate too much, but the pilot clearly lacks some features, because he can see only 2 instead of 10 networks - in the same place!

  Now, for Windows 7 x 64 things are good, I just stick to the provided windows (4.176.75.21) driver and I can use wi - fi without any problem in the world, at a good rate of functionality and performance.

  My problems are now turning to the 64 bit version of Windows 8, more precissely 8.1. I experimented with this and put aside the problem of wi - fi, which I can fix is more, everything seems fine and I'm pretty satisfied how my sistem works on win8 64-bit.

  The problem:

  (a) when running with the supplied Win8 driver, networks are few, just like using the driver lenovo, or even worse - a single available network - my router - 100 cm near my laptop! No other available network... Very bad.

  (b) for installing the same win7 32/64 bit driver on win8, which works without compatibility issues - I get the same results as the installation of the configuration of windows 7: 2 networks are in the same place.

  I read on the forums, that there may be a chance that lenovo will ship 8 to g550 windows drivers, but if they work in the same way that the current drivers for win7, they will be of no use to the expected rate of return. Can someone do something about providing better drivers, look at this problem?

  I also tried to deceive win8 and port the driver win7 64 for windows 8, by extracting the location of the pilot of the iso file or windows 7 installed driver (obtained a .inf and .sys file) but ultimately I can't install it in Windows 8, even with the option 'have disk... '. ", where he finally tells me that's not a win8 supported 64-bit driver. (No signed drivers problems or displaying a message).

  Now, as a solution for this, I would be grateful if someone could recommend one of the following:

  (1) either a way to make the driver lenovo work better, to configure it somehow, or provide another driver for win 7-64 which can also be run on win 8 (what should be), which has good performance

  (2) provide a 'port' mode the current win7 that works best with my Broadcom WiFi for windows 64-bit of 8.1 driver.

  Thanks for following this!

  OK, I solved my problems, this topic can be closed, as far as I'm concerned.

  I'll leave here the method in which I acted, as well as any other person who is faced with the same problem will be facilitated by this guide.

  Here's what I did:

  (1) carries the wireless driver for windows7 - that came on the original dvd - copied three files: two .inf files and a sys file, I believe - cannot remember exactly. Anyway, you can use export driver software and select your driver and it will automatically detect and retain the necessary driver files. I have saved files and if someone needs them, pm me and I'll tell you which files they are exactly, or send them.

  (2) once I got the win7 drivers, I entered my install windows 8.1 and accessible "Advanced Boot Options", which has an option available to select certain features on the next reboot-> you click on restart to see advanced features.

  (3) select 'disable' in the boot options advanced, driver signing checking once they appear, after the restat. This is necessary in order to get errors that do not allow you to install the win7 driver do not.

  (4) it just go to the device driver update manager, have the disc, select your .inf and there you go, just a few guests on the absence of the driver of a signature and you're ready, you can install the driver without problem.

  In my case, it worked perfectly!

  I did it too with other win7 drivers, and it worked also.

  Tip:

  If you have problems and the pilots still doesn't work, check the .inf file, it may need some modifications.

  See if there is a section 6.2 NTAMD4 (this is for win8) and if it isn't, or if this article contains no lines, just create or update the same lines that you see in tights under articles 6.0 or 6.1 also in section 6.2. Then the disk method will work for your desired Windows 8.1 driver installation.

  I think this can be useful for many situations, not only for this specific driver and model laptop, but for the most part are questions users driver compatibility.

• OME firewalls and ports configurations required

  I installed OME in a locked DMZ that is highly secure and has a number of different segments of network separated by firewalls... I installed OMSA on Windows physical server and ESXi 5.1 2012 hosts. I also have the physical hosts running Linux OS. OME can successfully connect to the iDRAC for each server, but not in OMSA

  Can you please indicate exactly what firewall ports must be opened to allow communications between OME and OMSA as well as between OME and iDRAC?

  Thank you

  Hi and thanks for the post.

  There should be a table in the user guide OME (online that came with the product, or at www.delltechcenter.com/ome.  The table is called:

  Support for protocols and Ports OpenManage Essentials

  And should highlight the ports you need.

  Thank you

  Rob

• What is my e-mail server name and port number

  Unable to send a scanned document because I don't know my server name and port number

  Your e-mail account provider has that information.
  They should have a help page on their Web site.
  If you tell us who provides your email account, maybe someone can help
  you.
   
   
   
  --
  Dave N.
  MS - MVP (Mail)
  Windows 7 Ultimate
  http://download.live.com/wlmail
   
   
   
  "badrisk" wrote in message news: eec85ab4-ac81-44d 9-a285-8aec5cdf9cb7...
  > cannot send a scanned document because I don't know my server name and port
  > number
  >
  >
  >
   

  Windows 7 Ultimate 64

• Cisco VCS and integration Lync2013

  Hello!

  Could you tell me please, when CISCO officially support Lync2013 - free new software for VCS - C and documentation on integration?

  The main interest is the possibility of transferring video between CISCO/MCU and Lync endpoints on the H.264 Protocol, who hails from Lync2013.

  Right now, I've got VCS - C and RTM Lync2013 X7.2. During the video call without AMGW appeal established as audio only.

  When using with Lync2010, it worked on Protocol H.263 and CIF resolution.

  Evgeniy salvation,

  We are currently investigating the possibilities to achieve interoperability between Lync 2013, VCS and video devices on the side of the VCS standards-based, it is a work in progress and at this stage, it is to early to provide any factual information on when interop will be available.

  In contrast to Lync 2010, Lync 2013 does not support H.263 for video and it so that will remove the OCS/Lync integration. I do however think that you should be able to make a two-way video between Lync 2013 and VCS-joined endpoints if you use an AMGW tried that yet?

  Thank you

  Andreas

• Troubleshoot VPN traffic to a paricular IP and port

  I'm having issues where the VPN users try to hit a particular server on a specific port. When it is connected to the local network, they can connect without problems, but not via the VPN. However, via the VPN they can PING the device and the RDP to it. I checked the ACL on the ASA 5510 and it seems that the ports are open. Any ideas how can I capture or trace that blocks them to hit this IP and port?

  for the sake of argument, let's say 10.1.1.1 is the IP address of the device and the port is 211

  When it is connected through the VPN, they get an address 172.16.x.x.

  Any help will be greatly appreciated

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

  This link has the time ASDM and CLI guides

  HTH. Please rate the answer if it solves your problem. Thank you

• What is the difference bewteen MCU, VCS, and SRI (DSP-3)

  Hi all

  We lack CUCM 9.X. I want to integrate Cisco 9971, 8945 with TP Endpoint (EX60 and Tandberg C40). I read this wonderful document (https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-30750), but I still have some doubts.

  What is the difference bewteen MCU, VCS, and SRI (DSP-3). For all I know, ISR running DSP3 is the chepaiest option but I don't know if the HD video is supported.

  Thanks regarding

  Remember messages useful rate by clicking on the stars below.
  Favor calificar todos las responses useful dando click in las estrellas mas abajo.
  ___________________________________________
  LinkedIn profile: do.linkedin.com/in/leosalcie

  Hello

  According to the document, you are referring to which I posted previously

  VCS is a call control system call manager but for video end points only, then CUCM is for voice and video, and now it becomes control system of very mature appeal for video communications with native support for video of many recordings of points

  MCU is a material that can be used to host the multi point/party video calls that can be registered to CUCM or VCS according to design

  SRI with DSP/PVDM 3 is the concept of the MCU, but can be used for small multi-point calls and normally remote sites that need local accommodation to a call to reduce the load on the WAN link when most of the participant in the same place for example! and it dose taken support HD but limited features compared to MCU

  for example PVDM3 doe does not support HD when participants are expected to use different video formats

  hope this helps

• Automatic update does not install 'ViewSonic - Bus USB and Ports, display controllers - ViewSonic VP2365WB.

  Windows update - AutoUpdate does not install 'ViewSonic - Bus USB and Ports, display controllers - ViewSonic VP2365WB. Any ideas? Thank you.

  Original title: Bus USB and Ports, display - ViewSonic VP2365WB controllers

  Windows update - AutoUpdate does not install 'ViewSonic - Bus USB and Ports, display controllers - ViewSonic VP2365WB. Any ideas? Thank you.

  Hide and unless the material was manufactured by Microsoft or the hardware manufacturer tells you that you should get the driver FROM Microsoft - do not install Microsoft device for material non-Microsoft drivers.

• RV220W and Port forwarding

  Hello

  I have a problem with my Cisco RV220W with Firmware 1.0.3.5

  I have in my local network a Dreambox with the IP 192.168.1.230, he listen Port 8880.

  How can I implement a WAN port forwarding to the Dreambox?

  Thank you

  Michael

  Hi Michael,

  Thank you for posting. Please follow the steps below to transfer the port to your Dreambox:

  1. Log in to the router, then go to: Firewall-> Access Control-Services > custom.
  2. Press 'Add' and then type Dreambox name, TCP for type. The Port of departure and Port of finish will be 8880. Press "Save".
  3. Go to the IPv4 firewall rules and press 'Add '. Use the following settings:

  Area: No reliable (WAN)

  Area: Trust (LAN)

  Service: Dreambox

  Action: Always allow the

  Source host: no

  Send to the Local (DNAT IP) server: type the address LAN IP of the Dreambox here device (i.e. 192.168.1.150)

  Ignore the other settings on this page and press 'Save' at the bottom. You should now be able to reach the Dreambox from the Web using: 8880

  Please let us know if it works or if you need further assistance.

• Darkness of 8.4 (1) vpn L2L filter ASA when you specify the Protocol and port

  Hi all - I've spent many hours trying to diagnose this and have read several discussions and the Cisco docs unsuccessfully...

  Situation: two sites running Cisco ASA 5520 on 8.4 (1) with L2L IPsec on the public internet between each of them. The configuration of IPsec and associated routing works as it should and we are able to pass traffic between networks private behind each device as expected. The problem occurs when you try to block sessions using a vpn-filter group policy configuration.

  Each site has 3 private subnets that are able to communicate correctly without the vpn-filter configuration. We want to restrict access to specific protocols, hosts, and ports between each network.

  SITE A: 10.10.0.0/18, 10.10.64.0/18, 10.10.128.0/18

  SITE B: 10.20.0.0/18, 10.20.64.0/18, 10.20.128.0/18

  When we apply a filter-vpn configuration which restricted access only two guests, as follows...

  SITE A: vpn_acl_x_x_x_x list extended access permit ip host 10.20.0.1 host 10.10.0.1

  SITE b: the ip host 10.10.0.1 allowed extended access list vpn_acl_x_x_x_x host 10.20.0.1

  ... the configuration works correctly. However, when we try to lock the configuration more far and specify the protocols and ports, as follows...

  SITE A: vpn_acl_x_x_x_x list extended access permit tcp host 10.20.0.1 host 10.10.0.1 eq 22

  SITE b: vpn_acl_x_x_x_x to the list of access permit tcp host 10.10.0.1 host 10.20.0.1 eq 22

  ... and then try to establish a SSH connection between 10.10.0.1 and 10.20.0.1 or vice versa, the package is stopped on the side of the SOURCE. ..

  Mar 22 11:58:01 x.x.x.x 22 March 2011 14:34:56: % ASA-4-106103: vpn_acl_x_x_x_x of the access list refused tcp to the user "" inside-data/10.10.0.1(59112)-> outside-iptrans/10.20.0.1(22) hit - cnt 1 first success [0xd8d1c1b4, 0 x 0]

  I would really appreciate it if someone could shed some light on what is wrong with this Setup.

  SOLUTION
  

  The ACE must be implemented on the source and the end of the tunnel destination to facilitate this configuration.

  EXAMPLE 1: allow SSH two-way communication between hosts on each network (SITE A can connect to SITE B, SITE B can connect to SITE A)...

  SITE A:
  access-list vpn_acl_x_x_x_x extended permit tcp host 10.20.0.1 host 10.10.0.1 eq 22
  access-list vpn_acl_x_x_x_x extended permit tcp host 10.20.0.1 eq 22 host 10.10.0.1
  SITE B:
  access-list vpn_acl_x_x_x_x extended permit tcp host 10.10.0.1 host 10.20.0.1 eq 22
  access-list vpn_acl_x_x_x_x extended permit tcp host 10.10.0.1 eq 22 host 10.20.0.1
  

  EXAMPLE 2: allow communication one-way SSH between hosts on each network (SITE A can connect to SITE B, SITE B is unable to connect to SITE A)...

  SITE A:
  access-list vpn_acl_x_x_x_x extended permit tcp host 10.20.0.1 eq 22 host 10.10.0.1
  SITE B:
  access-list vpn_acl_x_x_x_x extended permit tcp host 10.10.0.1 host 10.20.0.1 eq 22
  

  Very good and thank you for this post. Please kindly marks the message as answered while others may learn from your post. I think that you have started a very good discussion on vpn-filter for tunnel L2L.

• Soft scan and port of paper do not install when installing drivers for Brother MFC-665CW.

  When I try to install mfl pro suite in my daughters laptop, running windows 7 home premium, everyting installs except soft scan and port of paper.

  What should I do to install scan soft and port of paper.  It is said during the installatiom mfl pro suite is installed but I can not find anywhere on his hard drive. I tried to uninstall the drivers and then reinstall but still they do not appear in the programs, or scan paper port or mild...

  Original title: Brother MFC-665CW

  If you install from the disk of brother, all two soft scan and paperport I suspect would be part of the brother utilities/software scanning

  Is there a shortcut on the desktop brother for their utilities/software?

• generates keys option for VCS and VCSE cisco

  Hello team,

  How we generate option keys for cisco VCS and example VCSE under keys of the cisco site.

  LIC-VCS-10

  Video server Comm 10 Add Non-traversal network calls

  Thank you

  Renji

  Hi Renji.

  If you have already purchased the license and then click on the following link and re build.

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/swift/LicensingUI/tandbergLicenseLookup

  If it is not purchased then contact your account key to Cisco for new purchase Manager.

  HTH

  Kind regards

  Dharmmesh

• VCS and design of Microsoft Interoperability

  Hi guys,.

  need help from collective intelligence again.

  I've got VCS and Microsoft Interoperability key installed and correctly deployed interop with Lync - audio and videocalls. Lync federated domains and successfully can call for their users. I have configured the search rules in certain areas (for example, Microsoft.com) neighbor B2B Microsoft box. call begins, but at time of pick up at the bottom it is declining.

  is it possible to appeal to domains Federated Lync via Internet of the endpoint TC recorded on VCS?

  You try to call the Lync federated users from your Cisco VCS registered endpoint? Have you configured the settings of the ROUND and for VCS configuration on the Edge transport server?