RV220W and Port forwarding

Similar Questions

• NETGEAR ProSafe VPN Firewall SRXN3205 and port forwarding?

  Hi, this is a long shot, but I'm pulling my hair out at this point and can be a bit over my head, as I am new on network

  Small short story, I have two servers, one is the NAS box (IE if I connect via the internet to the site via public IP network from home, I get it that site says 'my actions' I insert login and pass and get access to them.)
  That is, everything is peachy.
  The problem is when I try to connect to my FileMaker Server I'm not and instead, he takes me to the login NAS box. So I think ok, I need to port forward (5003 for filemaker) to go to different PC local LAN(192. etc)

  Security > firewall > Add Service entering:
  Service: fmserver
  Action: Always leave
  Send to LAN Server: unique address 192. etc is filemaker installed on (and different on a NAS)
  Definition of Port number: 5003<-- is="" this="" right?="" how="" else="" would="" you="" indicate="" you="" want="" all="" connections="" on="" this="" port="" to="" go="" to="" this="" specific="" lan="" machine="" from="" internet="" instead="" of="" default="" which="" seems="" to="" be="">
  rest is default, I click on apply.

  Here's what I don't understand. In the table of incoming Services, (security > firewall) I have two local IP in the list, a SIN, the other for Filemaker. But only the top works and can be connected to. I can move every top position and it will work, but they will not work at the same time, just the one that sits on the top of the sad Smiley page

  and yes I read the manual again and again and don't know how I'm screwing up the port forwarding on this point, even if I am brand new to probably something stupid Smiley Happy (our work IT guy is gone so tried to get involved through this somehow)

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Hello sinieq,

  There is a hierarchy on incoming service table, which is normal. I see 4 services added using "ANY" (ALL use any port number) you will need to remove/disable these because of the rule of the hierarchy on the table, all other services will be ignored when EVERYTHING is used. What is the port number used by the NAS Server? I don't see a port defined to access NAS. Try disabling services by using "ANY" and try again by adding the translation to the port number of the NAS.

  Let us know what happens.

  Thank you

• Question about WRT54G2 and port forwarding

  Recently, I replaced my WRT54G with a new WRT54G2. My old router had the port forwarding for 2 pc is as follows:

  192.168.1.100

  6073 - UDP port

  2302-2303-TCP port

  192.168.1.101

  2302-2400-UDP

  6073 - at once

  8085 - at once

  TCP port 26100-26110

  27100-27110-both

  When I try to set up my new router, it says I have overlapping of ports. Maybe I'm confused but how could he have been working on my old router and now it does not work on my new?

  Of course, try this, and I think I could solve your problem.

• VPN site to Site with NAT and Port forwarding on a 871

  Hello

  Could someone please look at the config 871 router attached and tell me where I'm wrong!

  VPNs all work, work, BUT anyone trying to connect to a port that is sent through the VPN port forwarding fails.

  In the config attached Port 3389 (RDP) is sent to an internal server, if you connect to the external interface Internet connection is made and it works well, but if someone tries to connect to the IP address internal to that same server through VPN, it does not.

  We've added commands to stop working on the lines VPN NAT, but these do not seem to work.

  What Miss me?

  Thank you in advance and I will adjudicate all useful responses.

  It is a common problem. Yes you added controls to prevent NAT to work above the tunnel, but your static nat port to port 3389 takes precedence over the generic nat command, and there not all orders top to prevent it is nat would be above the tunnel.

  I wrote an example configuration for this some time, see here for more details:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml

  If all goes well, he explains everything. Note that it is for a general order static host, not a static port that you have, but the concept is exactly the same. Just add a statement roadmap on the end of your static command of the port, and this route map - will reference an ACL that denies are used when going up above the tunnel.

• VPN and port forwarding problem

  Hello

  I configured a VPN (IPSec) between 2 sites on Cisco 881 - K9.

  The server 'A', which the 192.168.0.X address must be accessible on port 80, 8080 and 90 of the public network.

  I have configured the ports of shipment with the command:

  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X 90 interface fastethernet 4 90

  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X 80 4 80 fastethernet interface

  IP nat inside source static TCP 8080 interface fastethernet 4 8080 192.168.0.X

  The server is accessible from the outside, the site in which it is located.

  But there is a problem with the second site:

  • I ping the server with its local address 192.168.0.X
  • But when I try to open a Web page that is using port 80 or 8080 or 90, the server appears inaccessible

  It seems that the problem is due to the translation of port because when I delete the configuration of port forwarding is no problem over on the second site.

  Thanks for your help

  Hello

  You need conditional NAT.
  When you want to Port Forwarding to work just for a part of traffic, e.g. when access to the server from the Internet
  but not for traffic entering via VPN, you can add a roadmap to the end.

  Thus,.
  IP nat inside source static TCP 192.168.0.X PUBLIC_IP 4 xx xx map route VPN

  The road map tells when it is NAT that will to spend.
  It will always happen, but when traffic is coming from the VPN.

  Now... the problem is that you can add a roadmap, when you have a rule of Port forwarding to an IP address (and not an interface).

  Anyway, give it a try and let us know.

  Federico.

• WRT160N V3 DMZ and Port-Forwarding does not work

  Hi all

  I have a V3 WRT160N and DMZ or Portforwarding do not work.

  I tried on locally

  WAN_PC-> WAN - PORT-> WRT160N V3-> LOCAL - PORT-> LOCAL_PC

  The WAN_PC has a static IP 192.168.1.2, subnet 255.255.255.0

  The WAN PORT has a static IP 192.168.1.1, subnet 255.255.255.0

  ON the WRT160N V3, I set up a DMZ on 192.168.0.100.and off the firewall.

  On the LOCAL_PC (192.168.0.100:8888) is an Apache

  So when I type 192.168.1.1:8888 on the WAN_PC I get NOOO the Apache on 192.168.0.100:8888 Web site?

  WHY??????????????

  Please correct me if I'm wrong. My understanding of your installation, it is that you have a computer connected to the internet port of the router and another computer connected to the router's ethernet port? Is this correct? You don't have a modem for internet connection or something like that? If you can post here a diagram that will be better. Thank you.

• ASA 5510 more and Port forwarding

  Hallo,

  I don't know if the thread title is correctly written, so I'll try to explain my problem.

  I have an ASA 5510 more linking several external interface VPN tunnels to internal interface. they work very well. Now I want to access a server in the internal network of trust on the Internet via RDP.

  I've set up a static NAT rule which translates by [my public ip phone]: 11111 on [the internal server ip]: 3389. Moreover, I met [my public ip phone] traffic: 11111 outside [the internal server ip]: 3389 inside via the access control list.

  Yes, it does not. I made a few soft logic error?

  Code:

  static (exterior, Interior) [the internal server ip] tcp 3389 [my laptop public ip] 11111 netmask 255.255.255.255

  Outside_access_in list extended access permit tcp host [my ip public notebook] [internal server ip] eq 3389

  Best regards

  EYAD Tayeb.

  Hi... I might have a word here!

  looking at your config you have

  static (inside, outside) tcp 3389 11111 netmask 255.255.255.255

  It should be

  static (inside, outside) of the tcp 3389 3389 netmask 255.255.255.255 interface

  Also... Make sure that the aplpied of the access list for the external interface in the outbound direction does not block traffic referred by your inside host with the public client that initiated the RDP session.

  I hope this helps... Please, write it down if she does!

• RVS4000 Port forwarding

  I have a RVS4000 put in place as my internet router/gateway to a client of 75 MS Server 2003 network. All network devices receive a static IP address. I used Port Forwarding and Port Range Forwarding on the RVS4000 to allow remote desktop connection to outside network to specific clients within the network. I have used all available space on the RVS4000 software for the seizure of the Port addresses and still needed to connect multiple users more. I bought a second RVS4000 and connected to the first through one of the lan ports, then the network through another lan port.  I have forwarded a range of addresses of the first router to another and then used the second router port forwarding and port forwarding tables range to the IP addresses of each client. Everything seems to be set up correctly and I can access both routers on the network, the individual port forwarding and the addresses of forwarding port on the first router range still work, but the transmitted address range appear not to be through to the second router and then to the customers. What I am doing wrong?

  I think the WRVS4400N has an IP based ACL that you can do to open the ports of the PC. It has a capacity of 1 G more but I don't know if the ACL can handle 25-50 PCs. I suggest you try to contact CISCO technical support so that you can be well informed of the router you need to make it work.

• Port forwarding on RV220W

  Hello

  I'll try to find a router that can do the redirection to other subnets of port. My current linksys has IP 192.168.1.1 and only allows me to move forward to 192.168.1.x, but I need to send to 2.x, 3.x, 4.x

  I can see how to do this on the RV215W through the emulator online, but Cisco has suggested that I use the RV220W. Looking into Microsoft device emulator, I can't understand how I would be put in place.

  I'm not in business, it's just to test at home.

  Hello

  It is certainly possible to do, but it may be different. What makes it worse, it's the emulator which is listed on the Web site is running the firmware more old. New firmware 1.0.1.0 beyond had changed around MISTLETOE. So even if you get used to how to do it with the emulator online, you will notice, it's still a little different in the new firmware, but not much.

  You'd have to do is to go under Firewall and go under the IPv4 firewall rules. You would then add a firewall rule declaring Wan LAN (from area to area) with your source and destination (source will usually be none) and 'send it to the local server' would be the ip you are transferring to. Under the list of service return, there will be a list of common services that you could use. If the service that you want to use does not appear, then you create what's called a personal service.

  Of course, it was just a quick run down. Port forwarding feature of this router gives you plenty of control and I would recommend to check up on the guide of the administrator for more details.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/rv220w/Administration/Guide/rv220w_ag_78-19743.PDF

  Other than that, what is your main goal? You don't yet need something flashy like the RV220w, the RV215 seems like it could do the job but seems to only go up to 4 VLANS if I remember, maybe wrong. It's probably much easier to set up at least in the RV215 well.

  I hope this helps you!

  Thank you

  Clayton Sill

• RV220w port forwarding notworking

  I want to transfer some port in the 8000-8100 Series.

  Goal is to reach the web interfaces for secondary roads real HTTPS protocol.

  Port forwarding does not work.

  An experienced person / solution for this. I really can use some help.

  see below for the current settings,

  For exaple 1 router IP wan = 192.168.0.17 Protocol Https port 8007 open external.

  It is a static IP address configured in the RV220W

  RV220 settings

  Configuration automaitc WAN IP-> external DHCP 192.168.0.100

  Network LAN IP 191.168.0.1

  subpattern 255.255.255.0

  Mode DHCP: DHCP server.

  Start 191.168.0.2

  end 191.168.0.10

  static addresses

  191.168.0.15 port forward 8005

  191.168.0.17 port 8007 forward.

  Firewall settings

  Type of incoming connection

  action always allow

  Https service

  IP source everything

  Send to the local server ip 191.168.0.17 Dnat

  status of enabled rule

  Port forwarding

  Action always allow

  Https service

  IP source everything

  destination 191.168.0.17

  internalPort 8007

  Access distance real webbrowser: Https://192.168.0.100:8007

  Hello, John...

  You must create a custom service and add the service to the access rule.

  To create the service customer please visit: http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=ffc3bc90423f4848abf81360523471f6_Custom_Service_Configuration_on_RV120_W_Firewall.xml&pid=4&fcid=&fpid=&slnid=5

  Access rule: see: http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=01ef2188693e42058388dbfe3311ea1f_Access_Rules_Configuration_on_Cisco_Small_Business_RV120W_Wi.xml&pid=4&fcid=&fpid=&slnid=5

  Kind regards

  Siva

• with vlc and wvc54c port forwarding

  I have an old wvc54c work with vlc through the LAN, but it won't work from WAN through a port forward.

  I have installation of redirection of WAN port correctly with airport extreme - I have other new wvc54gcn cameras that operate through thin WAN but the same exact transfer configuration (changing only the local ip address) will not work with the former wvc54c.

  What's wrong with the new WVC54gcn but the more wvc54c? Is there a work around I should use?

  I tried using port 1024 instead of 80, as suggested by some other posts here.

  Thanks for any clarification!

  OK, I thought about it. When installing the camera, I had not put something in the primary 'gateway' or 'dns '. I put them both to the IP of the router and who nailed him.

  Thanks for the help!

• Port forwarding blocking access SSH, POP3, and IMPA

  I recently acquired a Linksys EA8500 and very strange, annoying, and annoying problem has developed. I have a mail server and files in my home network I can access it from outside my house using a dynamic IP service. The server is running DNS as well, so it can be but from inside and outside the local network form using the same URL. Of course, external access, to set up the port forwarding on the router. This Setup has worked well with my previous, lower end, (a D-Link) router and, for a while, with the EA8500. However, there are some time (and I'm not aware of anything that has changed the situation) it doesn't work anymore: If port forwarding is enabled, requests for access over WiFi within the local network and outside the LAN are received by the server, as if they came from the top , instead of the actual computer and are thus rejected (authetication is through security keys). Always access requests work correctly on the cable connections and return to normal over WiFi if port forwarding is removed. Of course, this cancels the whole point of port forwarding. This never happened with the router D-Link and, as I mentioned, didn't happen with the EA8500 first. I have enabled and then disabled access as a guest and no DMZ have put in place, but which did not help. I have both the 2.5 MHz and 5 MHz networks active, although I'm only using version 2.5, but they have different sid, and I'm on the network with and without port forwarding 2.5 on.

  Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated

  Okay, I found where the problem was, and I apologize for having raised this issue just because I made a very stupid mistake. It turns out that I had added DNS servers external (outside my local file/mail/DNS server) to the list on my router (and I forgot about it). Cancel the additional DNS resolvers seems to have solved the problem. I'm far from understanding how the DNS works really, as you can see.

• Arbitrary RV220W Port forwarding

  I was able to use the rules of the IPv4 firewall for redirection http from port 80, since it is one of the Services listed, but I do not see how to configure the port forwarding for an arbitrary number of port to port. It was obvious with my older WRV200. Is there a way specify an arbitrary port you would have passed or is the router that is limited to the list of Services in the menu drop-down?

  Thank you

  Brian

  Hi Brian,.

  Thank you for posting. Try the firewall-> access control-> of personalized Services. Create your new service and you will be able to select in the IPv4 firewall rules. It is certainly a big change in our legacy routers. Please let us know if this helps or if you need further assistance.

• Unable to do port forwarding, to connect to the VPN and install Windows updates

  first of all, I tried to launch a minecraft Server trying to port forward, had problems with this, so I tried Hamachi, wouldn't connect to the VPN, then I tried Tunngle, at least, it was more useful, so I tried to use Device Manager to search for tunngle found when trying to manually install it, then he said that he could not or invaild something (or something of the sort) then it says windows may need to be put updated to fix this problem, so I tried to update to windows and it will not be updated, he is stuck at 0%, I tried the thing to download the patch to update windows and that has not helped,): I DO

  Original title: Windows Update will not be blocked at 0%

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community.

  Depending on your problem troubleshooting to establish a VPN connection, I recommend that you post your question in the TechNet forums. TechNet is watched by other computing professionals who would be more likely to help you.

  TechNet Forum

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home?category=w8itpro

  Hope this information is useful.

• The port forward does not work in RV120W?

  I am trying to configure a simple port forward in the RV 120W router, but can't seem to make it work.

  I created a custom service called RDP for the TCP 3389 3389 port.  I added a Port forward to always allow the RDP service, from any source to destination IP 192.168.50.23 IP address.  I tried with 'identical to incoming port' and also specified the port 3389 to forward to and to.

  Firewall access rule is activated and incoming value, always allow, RDP service, any source & destination IP, DNAT IP is 192.168.50.23.

  RDP works at the IP address of the local network.

  Any ideas?

  There is a problem with the RV220W, and work around this problem:

  Just use the firewall rules and not port forwarding.

  try on your rv120w and see.  Make sure that the last thing you do is re save firewall rule.

  It will be useful.