verification of IPSec on IOS / router

is there a way to check Cisco router syslogs an IPSec tunnel is established with another Cisco router / peer? I've been looking at manuals system (DRY, events Crypto) Message and sees that things that would indicate problems - would be able to verify syslogs to validate that a tunnel came without a problem, or if a tunnel down, etc. but not sure what these messages look like.

Thank you

-randy

Randy, now I understand!

What I would do in this case is a number of things, but it must again some minor configuration on the router, it depends on the managed router provider, but... you should be able to ask the provider know that you want to get traps syslog from the router to your syslog server and they should be able to provide this and they should provide that After all, you pay for the services, even if is a router that is handled by the provider.

On the router thye should set up a secondary server logging.

e.i

say that your syslog server is 20.20.20.20

Router (config) #logging 20.20.20.20

trap to Router (config) #logging of information

the foregoing information is facilitated #6 on the 7 levels of ease, 0 being emergency 1 critical alerts 2 and so on... I think with this # info tunnel facility appears in the syslog.

In addition, on the access lists on the tunnel Ipsec-L2L add the log keyword at the end of each of its access-list, with the journal of Keywork, the router will send traps related to the access list to your syslog, providing you with as well as the connection is stablihed or not.

Rgds

-Jorge

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • PIX IPSec tunnel - IOS, routing Options

    Hello

    I have an IPSec Tunnel between a PIX firewall and a router Cisco 1721.

    Have I not all options about any routing protocol can I use?

    Are there plans to add GRE support to PIX, so that EIGRP, OSPF can be used?

    ------Naman

    Here's a URL that tells how to configure GRE over IPSEC with OSPF. http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/707/gre_ipsec_ospf.html

  • IOS router VPN Client (easy VPN) IPsec with Anyconnect

    Hello

    I would like to set up my router IOS IPsec VPN Client and connect with any connect.
    Is it possible to configure an IPSec and SSL VPN Client on IOS router? I use for example a 1841.

    It would be perfect to give the user the choice of SSL or IPSec protocol. And the user needs that the Anyconnect Client.

    I think it's possible with a Cisco ASA. But I can also do this with an IOS router?

    Please let me know how if this is possible.

    Also is it true that the IOS routers are not affected to hear bug bleed? SSL VPN and SSL VPN with Anyconnect page is also save?

    http://Tools.Cisco.com/Security/Center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/CIS...

    But I am in any way interested in using IPSec and SSL VPN on a router IOS...

    It's true - CCP does not yet offer the options to configure a VPN IPsec with IKEv2.

    The configuration guide (here) offers detailed advice and includes examples of configuration.

  • IPSEC tunnel and Routing Support protocols

    Hello world

    I read that IPSEC does not support routing with VPN's Site to the other protocols because both are Layer4.

    This means that if Site A must reach the B Site over a WAN link, we use static IP on the Site A and Site B router?

    In my lab at home I config Site to Site VPN systems and they work correctly using OSPF does that mean that IPSEC supports the routing protocol?

    IF someone can explain this please?

    OSPF config one side

    router ospf 1

    3.4.4.4 router ID

    Log-adjacency-changes

    area 10-link virtual 10.4.4.1

    passive-interface Vlan10

    passive-interface Vlan20

    3.4.4.4 to network 0.0.0.0 area 0

    network 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 10

    network 192.168.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

    network 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

    network 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

    network 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

    network 192.168.98.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

    network 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

    3550SMIA #sh ip route

    Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP

    D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone

    N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2

    E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2

    i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2

    -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user

    o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

    Gateway of last resort is 192.168.5.3 to network 0.0.0.0

    192.168.12.0/24 [13/110] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    100.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    O 100.100.100.100 [110/3] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    3.0.0.0/8 is variably divided into subnets, 2 subnets, 2 masks

    O 3.3.3.3/32 [110/2] via 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    C 3.4.4.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0

    C 192.168.30.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan30

    64.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    O E2 64.59.135.150 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 1d09h, FastEthernet0/11

    4.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    O 4.4.4.4 [110/2] via 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    C 192.168.10.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan10

    172.31.0.0/24 is divided into subnets, 4 subnets

    O E2 172.31.3.0 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    O E2 172.31.2.0 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    O E2 172.31.1.0 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    O E2 172.31.0.0 [110/300] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    O 192.168.11.0/24 [110/3] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    O 192.168.98.0/24 [110/2] via 192.168.99.1, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/8

    C 192.168.99.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/8

    192.168.20.0/24 C is directly connected, Vlan20

    192.168.5.0/31 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    C 192.168.5.2 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/11

    C 10.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Tunnel0

    192.168.6.0/31 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    O 192.168.6.2 [110/2] via 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    192.168.1.0/24 [13/110] through 192.168.5.3, 3d17h, FastEthernet0/11

    O * E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 1d09h, FastEthernet0/11

    B side Config

    Side A

    router ospf 1

    Log-adjacency-changes

    network 192.168.97.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

    network 192.168.98.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

    network 192.168.99.0 0.0.0.255 area 0

    1811w # sh ip route

    Code: C - connected, S - static, mobile R - RIP, M-, B - BGP

    D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone

    N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2

    E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2

    i - IS - Su - summary IS, L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS level - 2

    -IS inter area, * - candidate failure, U - static route by user

    o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded route static

    Gateway of last resort is 192.168.99.2 to network 0.0.0.0

    192.168.12.0/24 [110/14] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    100.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    O 100.100.100.100 [110/4] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    3.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, 2 subnets

    O 3.3.3.3 [110/3] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    O 3.4.4.4 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    O 192.168.30.0/24 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    64.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    O E2 64.59.135.150 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 1d09h, FastEthernet0

    4.0.0.0/32 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    O 4.4.4.4 [110/3] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    O 192.168.10.0/24 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    172.31.0.0/24 is divided into subnets, 4 subnets

    O E2 172.31.3.0 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    O E2 172.31.2.0 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    O E2 172.31.1.0 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    O E2 172.31.0.0 [110/300] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    O 192.168.11.0/24 [110/4] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    C 192.168.98.0/24 is directly connected, BVI98

    C 192.168.99.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0

    O 192.168.20.0/24 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    192.168.5.0/31 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    O 192.168.5.2 [110/2] via 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    192.168.6.0/31 is divided into subnets, subnets 1

    O 192.168.6.2 [110/3] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    192.168.1.0/24 [110/14] through 192.168.99.2, 3d17h, FastEthernet0

    O * E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.99.2, 1d09h, FastEthernet0

    Thank you

    Mahesh

    Mahesh.

    Indeed, solution based purely crypto-card are not compatible with a routing protocol.  Crypto card however is the legacy config we support on IOS. The best practice is to use the protection of tunnel. Any routing protocol would work then.

    for example

    https://learningnetwork.Cisco.com/docs/doc-2457

    It's the best solution we currenty have

  • Create safer self-signed certificates on IOS router?

    I use a router in 1921 and use partially as an AnyConnect (WebVPN) server for remote access in the location.  The certificate I used was a self-signed certificate & trustpoint generated on the router.  I am running as the last IOS available track to ensure that it has all the latest features.

    Do a quick check of SSL against her of Qualys, he seems to have a lot of weaknesses and known vulnerabilities.

    * Poodle TLS

    * TLS 1.0 only

    * SHA1

    * Diffie-Hellman 1024 bits

    * Some algorithms of older encryption which seem to be available (but I've never specified), as TLS RC4_128_MD5

    The encryption mechanism and controls to create the cert don't give me much choice in the matter.

    Is there a new or better way to create a more secure certificate chain on an IOS router?  I couldn't find the instructions anywhere.

    Robert

    Take a look at my guide to private networks virtual Suite-B.  It creates more secure certificates.  Note my comment about the minimum software version to use.

    https://www.IFM.NET.nz/cookbooks/Cisco-IOS-router-IKEv2-AnyConnect-Suite-B-crypto.html

  • Cisco IOS router 837 - configure DDNS / dynamic DNS

    I have an Internet, connected to my Cisco router link. The package that I subscribed comes with a dynamic IP address. I said me, if I need remote access in the Cisco router, I need to enable the DDNS function. Is this possible on a Cisco router? I have been informed that this feature is not supported. Please help me

    Hi Bro

    Yes, Cisco ASA and Cisco IOS router supported DDNS. Just make sure you have the right version of IOS, which you could refer to this URL of Cisco http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3/12_3y/12_3ya8/gt_ddns.html#wp1202953.

    Please refer to the config below made with dyndns.org.

    !

    hostname INT-RTR1
    !
    IP domain name dyndns.org
    8.8.8.8 IP name-server
    !
    IP ddns update DynDNS method
    HTTP
    Add http://ramraj: [email protected] / * //nic/update?system=dyndns&hostname=&myip=>
    maximum interval of 30 0 0 0
    minimum interval 30 0 0 0
    !
    interface Dialer1
    IP ddns update hostname INT - RTR1.dyndns.org
    IP ddns update DynDNS
    !

    Note: hostname = INT - RTR1.dyndns.org was the host added/registered in the dyndns.org site.

    Note: Press Ctrl + V, then just type the symbol? When to add the CLI adds http://___ above.

    Note: ramraj:cisco123 is simply an example of an IDs in dyndns.org.

    You can also refer to this URL for more details http://www.petri.co.il/csc_configuring_dynamic_dns_in_cisco_ios.htm

    P/S: If you cela this comment is useful, please rate well :-)

  • AnyConnect VPN Client on IOS router

    Hi guys, I configured AnyConnect SSL VPN on Cisco 2811 router. It works perfectly when I login via web and customer execution of secure mobility. However, when I connect directly from the mobility client connection fails. He does not even ask me user name and password.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Mar 7 21:36:47.613: % SSLVPN-5-SSL_TLS_CONNECT_OK: vw_ctx: UNKNOWN vw_gw: VPN_GATEWAY i_vrf: 0 f_vrf: 0 status: successful with SSL/TLS connection distance

    21:36:47.617 7 March: WV: sslvpn rcvd context process queue event

    21:36:47.621 7 March: WV: sslvpn rcvd context process queue event

    21:36:47.745 7 March: WV: sslvpn rcvd context process queue event

    21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: entering APPL with framework: 0 x 49233618,

    Buffer (buffer: 0x4925DA18, data: 0x3F57ED98, len: 1,)

    offset: 0, area: 0)

    21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: fragmented data App - stamped

    21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: entering APPL with framework: 0 x 49233618,

    Buffer (buffer: 0x4925D818, data: 0x3F2033F8, len: 242,)

    offset: 0, area: 0)

    21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: Appl. Treatment failure: 2

    21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: server-side not ready to send.

    21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: server-side not ready to send.

    21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: server-side not ready to send.

    21:36:47.753 7 March: WV: sslvpn rcvd context process queue event

    21:36:47.753 7 March: WV: server-side not ready to send.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ====================

    Here is the config:

    =====================

    Crypto pki trustpoint VPN_TRUSTPOINT

    enrollment selfsigned

    Serial number

    name of the object CN = Academy-certificate

    crl revocation checking

    rsakeypair RSA_KEY

    !

    !

    VPN_TRUSTPOINT crypto pki certificate chain

    !

    local IP VPN_POOL 192.168.7.100 pool 192.168.7.150

    !

    WebVPN gateway VPN_GATEWAY

    IP address

    trustpoint SSL VPN_TRUSTPOINT

    Enable logging

    development

    !

    WebVPN install svc flash:/webvpn/anyconnect-win-3.1.02040-k9.pkg sequence 1

    !

    WebVPN context VPN_CONTEXT

    title "."<p class="help"> <p class="help">SSL authentication check all</p> <p class="help">!</p> <p class="help">connection message '<message>'.<p class="help"> <p class="help">!</p> <p class="help">Group Policy VPNPOLICY</p> <p class="help">functions required svc</p> <p class="help">SVC-pool of addresses "VPN_POOL."</p> <p class="help">SVC Dungeon-client-installed</p> <p class="help">generate a new key SVC new-tunnel method</p> <p class="help">SVC split include 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0</p> <p class="help">Group Policy - by default-VPNPOLICY</p> <p class="help">AAA authentication list default</p> <p class="help">Gateway VPN_GATEWAY</p> <p class="help">10 Max-users</p> <p class="help">development</p> <p class="help">--------------------</p> <p class="help">I did not understand, why customer mobility works at the launch of the web and why it does not work directly. Any input or advice would be much appreciated</p> <p class="reply">Hi Giorgi,</p> <p class="reply">This could be related to <a href="https://www.cisco.com/cisco/psn/bssprt/bss?searchType=bstbugidsearch&page=bstBugDetail&BugID=CSCti89976" rel="external nofollow noreferrer">CSCti89976</a>.</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="2"> <strong>AnyConnect 3.0 does not work with existing IOS.</strong> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p class="reply"><strong><strong>Symptoms</strong>:</strong><br>Customer independent AnyConnect 3.0 does not work with an existing headboard IOS.</p> <p class="reply"><strong><strong>Conditions</strong>:</strong><br>AnyConnect 3.0 with an IOS router as the network head.</p> <p class="reply"><strong>Workaround solution:</strong><br>Use AnyConnect 2.5 or weblaunch.<br>Update IOS</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p class="reply">Could not upgrade the version of IOS?</p> <p class="reply">HTH.</p> <p class="reply">Portu.</p></message>

  • Customer Cisco IPSec vpn cisco ios router <>==

    Hello

    I need to implement ipsec vpn for all users of 10-15. They all use the vpn cisco 5.x client and we have a router for cisco ios at the office. We already have a situation of work for these users. However, it has become a necessity which known only devices (laptops company) are allowed to install a virtual private network.

    I think that the only way to achieve this is to use certificates. But we don't won't to buy certificates if there is a free way to implement. So my question is

    (1) what are the options I have to configure vpn ipsec, where only known devices can properly configure a vpn and all unknown devices are blocked?

    (2) if the certificate is the only way. Can I somehow produce these certificates myself using cisco router ios?

    (3) someone at - it an example of a similar installation/configuration?

    Thanks in advance.

    Kind regards

    M.

    Unfortunately if you connect to the router IOS, there is no other way except using the certificate. If you connect to a Cisco ASA firewall, then you can identify the laptop company using DAP (Dynamic Access Policy).

  • IPSEC with the router and asa 5510

    Hi all

    I have problems connecting ipsec l2l. I have set up a router and asa 5510 make ipsec between them, but it seems to fail on the phase 1. I already check and I am 100% sure that is the key. You can a few shed light on the issue, I have. Here's the output debug I get the two system.

    Thank you

    Hello

    Isakmp policy match on both devices? What version of ios is running on the router and the asa5510

    Thank you

  • IPSec vpn ios - pix problem

    I have a big problem and I don't know what to do. set up a VPN with the following data:

    of the encryotion, md5 hash, dh 1, pre-shared, but when I tried to affermirai the vpn router ios show me this error

    Jul 1 20:50:15.311: IPSEC (validate_transform_proposal): application for conversion not supported for identity:

    {esp-3des esp-md5-hmac}

    Help, please

    show configurations.

  • The IPSec VPN and routing

    Hello

    I was polishing my PSAB on since I am currently in a job where I can't touch a lot of this stuff.  By a laboratory set up a site to IPSec VPN between two routers IOS.

    For example:

    https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps9422/products_configuration_example09186a0080ba1d0a.shtml

    The routers must specify how to route to the protected network.  Although I guess they could just use a default route to 172.17.1.2 as well.

    for example IP road 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.17.1.2

    172.17.1.2 won't have the slightest clue as to how to route for 10.10.10.0

    Even in an example with a tunnel between the ASA and the router IOS ASA failed to indicate a direct route to the subnet protected from 10.20.10.0, but it must still have a default route configuration. (https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#CLI)

    So it is basically saying, to reach the protected subnet to resolve the next hop on a device that has no idea where this subnet is anyway.  Shouldn't all the peer IP-based routing, and not on a subnet that routers between the two should have no idea they exist?

    The main hypothesis that I have here is that the protected subnets are not accessible unless the VPN tunnel is up.  Most of my experience of the VPN site-to-site is with PIX / ASA, and I've never had to specify a route towards the protected subnet (for example 172.16.228.0).  I guess he just used his default gateway that has an Internet IP belonging to the ISP.  However the ISP has no idea where is 172.16.228.0.

    Edit: I found a thread, do not report with Cisco but IPSec in general, this seems to be the question in case I don't have a lot of sense:

    http://comments.Gmane.org/Gmane.OS.OpenBSD.misc/192986

    He still does not seem logical to me.  If I have a tunnel linking the two class C networks by internet, the only routers having knowledge of these networks are the two counterparts.  Why a course should be (static, dynamic, default etc,) which seems to send traffic to a device that do not know where is the class C networks?  Although I have to take in my example with the 172.17.228.0 my ASA was not actually sends out packets to my ISP gateway with 172.17.228.0 in them.

    The purpose of the trail is * not * to send traffic to your next jump. You are right that the next hop router has no idea what to do with this package. This way is important for the local operation. The router must find the interface of output for the package. 'S done it with the road to the next-hop-router. If you remember that the road to your peer IPSec, your router must do a recursive search routing. After the outging interface is found, traffic is sent to this interface, the card encryption on this interface jumps and protects your traffic that is routed to your IPSec peer.

    --
    Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
    http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni

  • Opening of port (s) IPSec on perimeter router

    I currently have a PIX515E session behind a perimeter. This perimeter is connected to the Internet. It has configured ACL security. I want to do is use the PIX as a VPN endpoint and so need to open some ports on the perimeter router numbers to reach the PIX. I would use IPSec running mainly between the NCP and the PIX, but have no idea what to do with the ACL on the router. It's I would say "ip permit any fw - PIX" or should I say "permit tcp PIX - fw" Can anyone help with the port number is possible. Thank you.

    You must enable the following ports.

    ISAKMP - UDP 500

    IPSEC - ESP (Protocol)

    access-list 101 permit udp any host eq 500

    access-list 101 permit esp any host

  • IOS router with several groups of VPN

    Similar to a discussion, I read with a PIX firewall, I need to set up multiple VPN groups on IOS-based router to support different levels of security. For example, a VPN "GUESTS" group would only have access to 1 server, while the VPN "ADMIN" group would have access to the entire network.

    With a PIX firewall, you can simply specify additional group names (for example "group1 vpngroup',"vpngroup group2"and so on). However, I have not been able to find how do with IOS-based router (Cisco 831 12.3 (4) T) running.

    For example, I have these dynamic groups of VPN:

    the crypto isakmp client configuration group of GUESTS

    password1 keys

    DNS 10.1.1.1

    swimming POOL1-IP pool

    Configuration group customer crypto isakmp ADMIN

    key password2

    DNS 10.1.1.1

    POOL2-IP pool

    ! - Users get authenticated to a RADIUS server

    list of card crypto CRYPTOMAP customer VPN-USER authentication

    ! - The problem is that line taken out. "I can only specify an allow list (a group name) for this encryption card!)

    card crypto CRYPTOMAP ADMIN isakmp authorization list

    I did research on this site, Google, usenet and ORC and have not found what I'm looking for. Any ideas?

    Thank you.

    Command 'isakmp authorization list' you do it reference does not refer to the VPN group, it refers to a whitelist of AAA name which States that the groups are configured locally. Change to the following:

    AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

    card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor CRYPTOMAP

    The "groupauthor" is just a label that matches the encryption to the aaa command. Your clients VPN will be accompanied to a specific group depends on what group name, they set up in their VPN client.

    See http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080095106.shtml for details, it's a HW 3002 client to a router but the router config is exactly the same thing.

  • RA on IOS router VPN

    Hello Experts,

    Can someone send me the link on how to set up remote access VPN on Cisco IOS routers (authentication of remote users based on user names configured locally on the router itself)?    I found a few links, but they are all authencating by certificate, LDAP users.     I need authentication direct simple remote control-users by using the name of normal user/pass created on the router IOS locally.

    I don't have CA or LDAP server to authenticate remote users.  I just need simple authentication as what Cisco ASA.

    Hi Wade,.

    In addition to this shared Neno, you can check this link to third party which is pretty clear:

    http://www.tunnelsup.com/remote-access-VPN-connection-using-a-Cisco-router

    Kind regards

    Aditya

    Please evaluate the useful messages and mark the correct answers.

  • Installation of Server IPSec RV130W VPN router

    Recently, we bought 2 routers RV130W and didn't have problems establishing an IPSec VPN tunnel from site to site between 192.168.xxx.0 and 192.168.yyy.0 now on one of the routers (192.168.xxx.1) I want to configure the section of Server client IPSec for remote clients can VPN into the business.  When I try to do this on the router I don't able to assign a subnet to 192.168.xxx.0 in the Phase 2 section like it says then on the interface "rule is already in use.  I think that you can not have IPSec site-to-site and client-to-site IPSec running simultaneously on these routers? I'm not really interested to use PPTP in that moment.

    Hi Brian,.

    Please remove the Configuration of the Tunnel, start to configure the VPN server, first and after that set up the VPN Tunnel and it should work.

    Please let me know after your test

    Greetings

    Mehdi

Maybe you are looking for