VPN on 3 routers routing RV320

I have 3 RV320 configured as a Hub & talk VPN configuration. VPN configuration everything from gateway to gateway

All 3 RVs have direct access to the internet because they are set to be the gateway instead of the router.

The problem I encounter is the 2 rays cannot see each other, but both can see the hub.

I need to configure on talking RV to create a route to reach the other spoke RV and vice versa.

Thank you.

Yes, most certainly.

You can create a VPN of mesh and all devices must be able to talk to each other. The best part is that this type of configuration is supported, so if you have problems we can certainly help you.

I hope this helps.

Tags: Cisco Support

Similar Questions

Client OS VPN works with routers RV042G?

I bought a RV042G, but the documentation makes no reference that this router supports Mac OS x 10.8 or any other OSX version.

Client OS VPN works with routers RV042G?

I appreciate any response.

Hi Marcos, Yes, for PPTP. IPsec built in does not work by default as is the 'same' as the Cisco VPN 5.x.

-Tom
Please evaluate the useful messages

Cisco IPsec VPn via a BT router

Hi all

A customer comes to buy a Cisco UC520 and is eager to VPN in the system with its IP communicator, do you know what are the settings that I have to configure it to allow the VPN through the BT router?

Is this just a port before I need or is there some other parameters.

Thank you

Nathan

Hi Nathan

Do not have much with BT routers but what follows the document object should help

http://btbusiness.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/A_ID/9445/~/how-do-i-set-up-port-forwarding-on-the-BT-business-hub%3F

Ports for VPN traffic are udp 500, 4500 & 10000

It may be useful

Configure several IPSec VPN between Cisco routers

I would like to create multiple ipsec VPN between 3 routers. Before applying it, I would like to check on the config I wrote to see if it works. It's just on RouterA configuration for virtual private networks to RouterB, and RouterC.

As you can apply in a cyptomap by interface, I say with the roadmap, that it should be able to manage traffic for both routers. Or is there a better way to do it?

RouterA - 1.1.1.1

RouterB - 2.2.2.2

RouterC - 3.3.3.3

RouterA

crypto ISAKMP policy 10

BA 3des

preshared authentication

Group 2

ISAKMP crypto key RouterB address 2.2.2.2

ISAKMP crypto keys RouterC address 3.3.3.3

invalid-spi-recovery crypto ISAKMP

ISAKMP crypto keepalive 5 10 periodicals

ISAKMP crypto nat keepalive 30

!

life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800

!

Crypto ipsec transform-set AES - SHA esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac

!

outsidemap 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

defined peer 2.2.2.2

game of transformation-AES-SHA

match address 222

outsidemap 30 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

defined peer 3.3.3.3

game of transformation-AES-SHA

match address 333

!

interface GigabitEthernet0/0

Description * Internet *.

NAT outside IP

outsidemap card crypto

!

interface GigabitEthernet0/1

Description * LAN *.

IP 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0

IP nat inside

!

IP nat inside source map route RouterA interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload

!

access-list 222 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 223 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 223 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

access-list 333 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 334 deny ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255

access-list 334 allow ip 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 any

!

!

RouterA route map permit 10

corresponds to the IP 223 334

Hi Chris,

The two will remain active.

The configuration you have is for several ste VPN site is not for the redundant VPN.

The config for the redundant VPN is completely different allows so don't confuse is not with it.

In the redundant VPN configuration both peers are defined in the same card encryption.

Traffic that should be passed through the tunnel still depend on the access list, we call in the card encryption.

This access-lsist is firstly cheked and as a result, the traffic is passed through the correct tunnel

HTH!

Concerning

Regnier

Please note all useful posts

Site to Site VPN of IOS - impossible route after VPN + NAT

Hello

I have problems with a VPN on 2 routers access 8xx: I am trying to set up a quick and dirty VPN Site to Site with a source NAT VPN tunnel endpoint. This configuration is only intended to run from one day only inter. I managed to do the work of VPN and I traced the translations of NAT VPN tunnel endpoint, but I couldn't make these translated packages which must move outside the access router, because intended to be VPN traffic network is not directly connected to leave the router. However, I can ping the hosts directly connected to the router for access through the VPN.

Something done routing not to work, I don't think the NATing, because I tried to remove the NAT and I couldn't follow all outgoing packets that must be sent, so I suspect this feature is not included in the IOS of the range of routers Cisco 8xx.

I'm that extends the features VPN + NAT + routing too, or is there a configuration error in my setup?

This is the configuration on the router from Cisco 8xx (I provided only the VPN endpoint, as the works of VPN endpoint)

VPN endpoints: 10.20.1.2 and 10.10.1.2

routing to 192.168.2.0 is necessary to 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.1.254

From 172.31.0.x to 192.168.1.x

!

version 12.4

no service button

horodateurs service debug datetime msec

Log service timestamps datetime msec

encryption password service

!

hostname INSIDEVPN

!

boot-start-marker

boot-end-marker

!

enable secret 5 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

!

No aaa new-model

!

!

dot11 syslog

no ip cef

!

!

!

!

IP domain name xxxx.xxxx

!

Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel

!

!

username root password 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

!

!

crypto ISAKMP policy 10

BA 3des

preshared authentication

ISAKMP crypto key address 10.20.1.2 xxxxxxxxxxxxx

!

!

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac VPN-TRANSFORMATIONS

!

CRYPTOMAP 10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

defined by peer 10.20.1.2

game of transformation-VPN-TRANSFORMATIONS

match address 100

!

Archives

The config log

hidekeys

!

!

LAN controller 0

line-run cpe

!

!

!

!

interface BRI0

no ip address

encapsulation hdlc

Shutdown

!

interface FastEthernet0

switchport access vlan 12

No cdp enable

card crypto CRYPTOMAP

!

interface FastEthernet1

switchport access vlan 2

No cdp enable

!

interface FastEthernet2

switchport access vlan 2

No cdp enable

!

interface FastEthernet3

switchport access vlan 2

No cdp enable

!

interface Vlan1

no ip address

!

interface Vlan2

IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.248

NAT outside IP

IP virtual-reassembly

!

interface Vlan12

10.10.1.2 IP address 255.255.255.0

IP nat inside

IP virtual-reassembly

card crypto CRYPTOMAP

!

IP forward-Protocol ND

IP route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.254

IP route 10.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.10.1.254

Route IP 172.31.0.0 255.255.0.0 Vlan12

!

!

no ip address of the http server

no ip http secure server

IP nat inside source static 172.31.0.2 192.168.1.11

IP nat inside source 172.31.0.3 static 192.168.1.12

!

access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255

access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 172.31.0.0 0.0.255.255

!

!

control plan

!

!

Line con 0

no activation of the modem

line to 0

line vty 0 4

password 7 xxxxxxxxx

opening of session

!

max-task-time 5000 Planner

end

Hi Jürgen,

First of all, when I went through your config, I saw these lines,

!

interface Vlan2

IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.248

!

!

IP route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.254

!

With 255.255.255.248 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.254 subnet will fall to different subnets. So I don't think you can join 192.168.2.0/24 subnet to the local router at this point. I think you should fix that first.

Maybe have 192.168.1.2 255.255.255. 248 on the router connected (instead of 192.168.1.254)

Once this has been done. We will have to look at routing.

You are 172.31.0.2-> 192.168.1.11 natting

Now, in order for that to work, make sure that a source addresses (192.168.1.11) NAT is outside the subnet router to router connected (if you go with 192.168.1.0/29 subnet router to router, with 192.168.1.1/29 on the local router and 192.168.1.2/29 on the connected router as suggested, it will be fine). So in this case 192.168.1.8/29 to the subnet that your NAT would be sources fall.

Have a static route on the router connected (192.168.1.2) for the network 192.168.1.8/29 pointing 192.168.1.1,

!

IP route 192.168.1.8 255.255.255.248 192.168.1.1

!

If return packets will be correctly routed toward our local router.

If you have an interface on the connected rotuer which includes the NAT would be source address range, let's say 192.168.1.254/24, even if you do your packages reach somehow 192.168.2.0/24, the package return never goes to the local router (192.168.1.1) because the connected router sees it as a connected subnet, so it will only expire

I hope I understood your scenario. Pleae make changes and let me know how you went with it.

Also, please don't forget to rate this post so useful.

Shamal

Multiple VPN connections using 871 router

Hello

I have the cisco router 871 at the site of the retail that connects to the corporate site. I also want to connect a device to the sharing network partner, but it needs to connect to their virtual private network. Is it possible to configure the 2 VPN connection to 2 different company sites in this scenario?

Thanks for your help.

Umesh.

Hello

You can configure multiple VPN tunnels on the router (whether on the same interface or different interfaces).

You can then perform the traffic from a tunnel in another tunnel, if you must do the same.

Federico.

Problems with VPN on a PAT router

Hello

I have problems to make my VPN to work. I read through various examples of configuration, but don't always have it work properly.

Scenario: connection with the Cisco VPN Client to my router from outside.

Router works like NAT/PAT overload. Internet: Internal FA0/1 network: FA0/0

Problems: connection is working without problem, but I can't access anything in the network behind the router. Some hosts ping sometimes works, sometimes doesn't.

Does anyone have an idea of what could be the problem and what wrong with my setup?

Thanks in advance!

Here is my configuration:

Current configuration: 5817 bytes
!
! Last modification of the configuration at 14:41:13 CEST Saturday, July 3, 2010
!
version 12.3
horodateurs service debug uptime
Log service timestamps uptime
no password encryption service
!
router01 hostname
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
enable secret 5 - CENSORED-

activate the password - CENSORED-

!
clock timezone THIS 1
clock to summer time it IS recurring
AAA new-model
!
!
local USERLIST of AAA authentication login.
local GROUP AAA authorization network
AAA - the id of the joint session
IP subnet zero
IP cef
!
!
!
Max-events of po verification IP 100
IPv6 unicast routing
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
username password 0 - CENSORED - TEST

!
!
!
!
crypto ISAKMP policy 10
BA aes 256
preshared authentication
Group 2
the local address ADDRESSPOOL pool-crypto isakmp client configuration
ISAKMP xauth timeout 60 crypto

!
Configuration group customer isakmp crypto GROUP
-UNCENSORED - key

pool ADDRESSPOOL
ACL 150
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - aes 256 esp-sha-hmac SET
!
crypto dynamic-map 10 DYNMAP
Set transform-set
market arriere-route
!
!
list of authentication of card crypto client DYNMAP USERLIST
list of crypto isakmp DYNMAP card authorization GROUP
crypto card for the DYNMAP client configuration address respond
card crypto DYNMAP 10-isakmp dynamic ipsec DYNMAP
!
!
!
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
IP 172.16.0.250 255.255.252.0
IP nat inside
automatic speed
full-duplex
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.93
encapsulation dot1Q 93
IP 172.20.2.5 255.255.255.252
!
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
Shutdown
no fair queue
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
DHCP IP address
NAT outside IP
automatic duplex
automatic speed
No cdp enable
card crypto DYNMAP
!
interface Serial0/1
no ip address
Shutdown
No cdp enable
!
!
local IP ADDRESSPOOL 172.17.0.100 pool 172.17.0.150
IP nat inside source list 1 interface FastEthernet0/1 overload
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 80 interface FastEthernet0/1 81
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.2.4 2909 interface FastEthernet0/1 2909
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.2.1 3389 3389 FastEthernet0/1 interface
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 50000 interface FastEthernet0/1 50000
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52000 interface FastEthernet0/1 52000
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52001 interface FastEthernet0/1 52001
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52002 interface FastEthernet0/1 52002
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52003 interface FastEthernet0/1 52003
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52004 interface FastEthernet0/1 52004
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52005 interface FastEthernet0/1 52005
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52006 interface FastEthernet0/1 52006
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52007 interface FastEthernet0/1 52007
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52008 interface FastEthernet0/1 52008
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52009 interface FastEthernet0/1 52009
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52010 interface FastEthernet0/1 52010
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52011 interface FastEthernet0/1 52011
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52012 interface FastEthernet0/1 52012
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52013 interface FastEthernet0/1 52013
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52014 interface FastEthernet0/1 52014
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52015 interface FastEthernet0/1 52015
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52016 interface FastEthernet0/1 52016
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52017 interface FastEthernet0/1 52017
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52018 interface FastEthernet0/1 52018
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52019 interface FastEthernet0/1 52019
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.51 52020 interface FastEthernet0/1 52020
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.11 80 interface FastEthernet0/1 80
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.11 443 interface FastEthernet0/1 443
IP nat inside source static tcp 172.16.1.1 25 interface FastEthernet0/1 25
no ip address of the http server
no ip http secure server
IP classless
!
enable IP pim Bennett
!
access-list 1 permit 172.16.0.0 0.0.3.255
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 50000
access-list 101 permit tcp everything any 52000 52020 Beach
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 443
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq smtp
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 3389
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2909
access-list 150 permit ip 172.16.0.0 0.0.3.255 172.17.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 151 allow ip 172.16.0.0 0.0.3.255 all
!
SHEEP allowed 10 route map
corresponds to the IP 151

!
public RO SNMP-server community
!
!
!
!
!
Line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
line to 0
line vty 0 4
password - CENSORED-

!
NTP-period clock 17180405
source NTP FastEthernet0/1
NTP 162.23.41.34 Server
NTP 162.23.41.56 Server
NTP 162.23.41.55 Server
!
end

Jenny,

The NAT config is a little weird, you list 1.

List 1 is everything inside. (so all traffic inside subnet must be natted).

You must create an extended access list and create the entry

IP access-l ext 195

10 deny ip LOCAL_ADDRESS LOCAL_MASK VPN_POOL VPN_MASK

1000 ip LOCAL_ADDRESS LOCAL_MASK perm all

and apply that list to NAT overload.

This gives a try and let me know.

Edit: Ouch, 12.3 Mainline... Ollllllllllllld

LAN to lan vpn between ASA and router 7200

Hi friends,

I need to configure the lan to lan between ASA vpn (remote location) and router 7200 (on our network).

<7200 router="" (ip="" add:="" 10.10.5.2)="">-(Internet) -<(IP add:="" 192.168.12.2)="" asa(5510)="">---192.135.5.0/24 network

I will have the following configuration:

7200 router:

crypto ISAKMP policy 80

the enc

AUTH pre-shared

Group 1

life 3600

ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 192.168.12.2

Cryto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtrans

map VPNTunnel 80 ipsec-isakmp crypto

defined by peer 192.168.12.2

game of transformation-VPNtrans

match address 110

int fa0/0

IP add 10.10.5.2 255.255.255.192

IP virtual-reassembly

no ip route cache

Speed 100

full duplex

card crypto VPNTunnel

access-list 110 permit ip any 192.135.5.0 0.0.0.255

ASA:

int e0/0

nameif inside

security-level 100

192.135.5.254 Add IP 255.255.255.0

int e0/1

nameif outside

security-level 0

IP add 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.240

access-list ACL extended ip 192.135.5.0 allow 255.255.255.0 any

Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 192.168.12.3 1

"pre-shared key auth" ISAKMP policy 10

ISAKMP policy 10-enc

ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

10 1 ISAKMP policy group

ISAKMP duration strategy of life 10-3600

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtran

card crypto VPN 10 matches the ACL address

card crypto VPN 10 set peer 10.10.5.2

card crypto VPN 10 the transform-set VPNtran value

tunnel-group 10.10.5.2 type ipsec-l2l

IPSec-attributes of type tunnel-group 10.10.5.2

cisco123 pre-shared key

card crypto VPN outside interface

ISAKMP allows outside

dhcpd address 192.135.5.1 - 192.135.5.250 inside

dhcpd dns 172.15.4.5 172.15.4.6

dhcpd wins 172.15.76.5 172.15.74.5

dhcpd lease 14400

dhcpd ping_timeout 500

dhcpd allow inside

Please check the configuration, please correct me if I missed something. I'm in a critical situation at the moment...

Please advise...

Thank you very much...

Where it fails at the present time?

Can you share out of after trying to establish the VPN tunnel:

See the isa scream his

See the ipsec scream his

Please also run the following debug to see where it is a failure:

debugging cry isa

debugging ipsec cry

Configure remote VPN easy on 1800 router

Hello

I want to create an easy remote VPN on my cisco router 1800 at work to be able to access my home network

using Cisco VPN client. Does anyone have the configurations for this?

My router is: 192.168.0.253

My DNS server: 192.168.0.78

My external IP address: x.x.x.250

Appreciated all help

Concerning

Here you go:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800946b7.shtml

Federico.

AnyConnect VPN Client on IOS router

Hi guys, I configured AnyConnect SSL VPN on Cisco 2811 router. It works perfectly when I login via web and customer execution of secure mobility. However, when I connect directly from the mobility client connection fails. He does not even ask me user name and password.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mar 7 21:36:47.613: % SSLVPN-5-SSL_TLS_CONNECT_OK: vw_ctx: UNKNOWN vw_gw: VPN_GATEWAY i_vrf: 0 f_vrf: 0 status: successful with SSL/TLS connection distance

21:36:47.617 7 March: WV: sslvpn rcvd context process queue event

21:36:47.621 7 March: WV: sslvpn rcvd context process queue event

21:36:47.745 7 March: WV: sslvpn rcvd context process queue event

21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: entering APPL with framework: 0 x 49233618,

Buffer (buffer: 0x4925DA18, data: 0x3F57ED98, len: 1,)

offset: 0, area: 0)

21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: fragmented data App - stamped

21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: entering APPL with framework: 0 x 49233618,

Buffer (buffer: 0x4925D818, data: 0x3F2033F8, len: 242,)

offset: 0, area: 0)

21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: Appl. Treatment failure: 2

21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: server-side not ready to send.

21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: server-side not ready to send.

21:36:47.749 7 March: WV: server-side not ready to send.

21:36:47.753 7 March: WV: sslvpn rcvd context process queue event

21:36:47.753 7 March: WV: server-side not ready to send.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

====================

Here is the config:

=====================

Crypto pki trustpoint VPN_TRUSTPOINT

enrollment selfsigned

Serial number

name of the object CN = Academy-certificate

crl revocation checking

rsakeypair RSA_KEY

!

!

VPN_TRUSTPOINT crypto pki certificate chain

!

local IP VPN_POOL 192.168.7.100 pool 192.168.7.150

!

WebVPN gateway VPN_GATEWAY

IP address

trustpoint SSL VPN_TRUSTPOINT

Enable logging

development

!

WebVPN install svc flash:/webvpn/anyconnect-win-3.1.02040-k9.pkg sequence 1

!

WebVPN context VPN_CONTEXT

title "." SSL authentication check all ! connection message '<message>'. ! Group Policy VPNPOLICY functions required svc SVC-pool of addresses "VPN_POOL." SVC Dungeon-client-installed generate a new key SVC new-tunnel method SVC split include 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Group Policy - by default-VPNPOLICY AAA authentication list default Gateway VPN_GATEWAY 10 Max-users development -------------------- I did not understand, why customer mobility works at the launch of the web and why it does not work directly. Any input or advice would be much appreciated Hi Giorgi, This could be related to <a href="https://www.cisco.com/cisco/psn/bssprt/bss?searchType=bstbugidsearch&page=bstBugDetail&BugID=CSCti89976" rel="external nofollow noreferrer">CSCti89976</a>. <table> <tbody> <tr> <td colspan="2"> AnyConnect 3.0 does not work with existing IOS. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Symptoms: Customer independent AnyConnect 3.0 does not work with an existing headboard IOS. Conditions: AnyConnect 3.0 with an IOS router as the network head. Workaround solution: Use AnyConnect 2.5 or weblaunch. Update IOS </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Could not upgrade the version of IOS? HTH. Portu.</message>

IPsec site to Site VPN on Wi - Fi router

Hello!

Can someone tell me if there is a router Netgear Wi - Fi that can form IPsec Site to Site VPN connection between 2 Wi - Fi routers via the WAN connection?

I know that this feature exists on the Netgear firewall, but can you have the same function on any Wi - Fi router?

See you soon!

Michael

I suspect that.

Thank you very much for the reply.

See you soon!

Routing problem between the VPN Client and the router's Ethernet device

Hello

I have a Cisco 1721 in a test environment.

A net 172.16.0.0/19 simulates the Internet and a net 192.168.1.0/24 simulates the net, the VPN tunnel must go to (intranet).

The net 172.16.0.0 depends on the router 0 FastEthernet, Intranet (VPN) hangs on Ethernet 0.

The configuration was inspired form the sample Configuration

"Configuring the Client VPN Cisco 3.x for Windows to IOS using Local extended authentication"

and the output of the ConfigMaker configuration.

Authentication and logon works. Client receives an IP address from the pool. But there's a routing problem

side of routers. Ping client-side - do not work (the VPN client statistics that count encrypt them packets, but not to decrypt).

Ping the router works too, but decrypt and encrypt customer statistics in VPN packets count progressive

(customer has a correct route and return ICMP packets to the router).

The question now is:

How to route packets between the Tunnel and an Ethernet device (Ethernet 0)?

conf of the router is attached - hope that's not too...

Thanks & cordially

Thomas Schmidt

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- snipp .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

!

version 12.2

horodateurs service debug uptime

Log service timestamps uptime

encryption password service

!

!

host name * moderator edit *.

!

enable secret 5 * moderator edit *.

!

!

AAA new-model

AAA authentication login userauthen local

AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

!

! only for the test...

!

username cisco password 0 * moderator edit *.

!

IP subnet zero

!

audit of IP notify Journal

Max-events of po verification IP 100

!

crypto ISAKMP policy 3

3des encryption

preshared authentication

Group 2

!

ISAKMP crypto client configuration group 3000client

key cisco123

pool ippool

!

! We do not want to divide the tunnel

! ACL 108

!

Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT

!

Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

Set transform-set RIGHT

!

map clientmap client to authenticate crypto list userauthen

card crypto clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor

client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer

10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap

!

interface Ethernet0

no downtime

Description connected to VPN

IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

full-duplex

IP access-group 101 in

IP access-group 101 out

KeepAlive 10

No cdp enable

!

interface Ethernet1

no downtime

address 192.168.3.1 IP 255.255.255.0

IP access-group 101 in

IP access-group 101 out

full-duplex

KeepAlive 10

No cdp enable

!

interface FastEthernet0

no downtime

Description connected to the Internet

IP 172.16.12.20 255.255.224.0

automatic speed

KeepAlive 10

No cdp enable

!

! This access group is also only for test cases!

!

no access list 101

access list 101 ip allow a whole

!

local pool IP 192.168.10.1 ippool 192.168.10.10

IP classless

IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.12.20

enable IP pim Bennett

!

Line con 0

exec-timeout 0 0

password 7 * edit from moderator *.

line to 0

line vty 0 4

!

end

^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^- snapp ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-

Thomas,

Can't wait to show something that might be there, but I don't see here. You do not have the card encryption applied to one of the interfaces, perhaps it was not copied. Assuming your description you do it, or should it be, applied to the fa0 and you are connected. Try how you ping? Since the router or a device located on E0? If you ping the router, you will need to do an extended ping of E0 to the ip address of the client has been assigned. If your just ping the router without the extension, you will get sales and decrypts that you declare on the client. Have you tried to ping from the client to interface E0? Your default route on the router is pointing to fa0? You have a next hop to affect? You have several NIC on the client pc? Turn off your other network cards to check that you don't have a problem with routing on the client if you have more than one.

Kurtis Durrett

Tunnel GRE / IP Sec VPN firewall between the router Cisco and Fortigate

Hello

Can I do GRE Tunnel / VPN IP Sec between Cisco router and Fortigate Firewall?

Thank you

Hi zine,.

As long as the Fortigate device support GRE over IPSEC, you will be able to create the tunnel between these 2 devices.

Here is the config for the Cisco Site:

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/16066/how-configure-GRE-over-IPSec-tunnel-routers

Happy holidays!

-Randy-

Throuput VPN on a 2651XM router

Where can I find this info?

Also, I got the used router (for nearly nothing $) but I know it's a value of some $$$. Where can I find out what model it is exactly? 'show version' doesn't show much.

Oh sorry, pasted the link partner. This link doesn't seem to be available on a non-partner unfortunately link, so here's a copy of the relevant pieces of her:

--------------------------------------

AIM-VPN/BPII, is only supported in the Cisco 2600XMs. It has support for DES/3DES and AES (optimized for the AES128 only) as well as layer 3 Compression (IPPCP). This module requires ZJ Cisco IOS version 12.2 (15) and later versions.

AIM-VPN/BPII - MORE is only supported in the Cisco 2600XMs. AIM-VPN/EPII-PLUS is supported in the 2691 and 3725 only. The BPII-PLUS and EPII-PLUS supports DES/3DES and are optimized for all key AES (AES128, AES192 and AES256) with Layer 3 Compression (IPPCP). These modules are supported in 12.3 (5 c), 12.3 (6) and later for the releases of the pipe major and 12.3 (7) T and later for releases of T.

Q. What is the function executes the VPN Module?

A. the Module VPN of Cisco 1700, 2600, 3600, and 3700 Series optimizes the platform for the IPSec VPN. Module accelerates not only the triple data standard (3DES) encryption and data (a) standard encryption, advanced encryption standard (AES) algorithms used in IPSec, but it handles many other tasks related to IPSec: hash, key exchange and storage of security associations. In doing so, the VPN module releases the Cisco 1700 series processor, 2600, 3600, and 3700 to run another router, voice and firewall features.

Q. What is the maximum performance DES/3DES/AES-128 IPSec with packages of 1 400 byte for the Cisco 1700 series, 2600, 3600, and 3700 using the VPN Module?

A. Cisco 2650/51XM with AIM-VPN/BPII or AIM-VPN/BPII-PLUS will give 10 Mbps throughput with traffic IMIX, 22 Mbpsthroughput with the packet size of 1400bytes and support 800 tunnels.

Q. What is the maximum performance of the IPSec AES-192/256 with IMIX packages for Cisco 1700 series, 2600, 3600, and 3700 using the VPN Module?

A. Cisco 2650/51XM with AIM-VPN/BPII will give 8.5 Mbit/s throughput with traffic IMIX for AES-192 and 256. BPII-MORE will give around 10 Mbps performance.

-----------------------------------------

In addition, you should know that this card was that EOL would be according to:

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/routers/ps274/prod_eol_notice0900aecd802d3d0b.html

It is still supported until 2010 and will work well for you, it is simply not fast enough with AES-192 and AES-256 as the version MORE than the same card, which was hardware-optimized especially for large key sizes. If you use 3DES or AES-128, then there is no difference in performance.

VPN between 2 routers Cisco 1841 (LAN to LAN)

Hello

I need to connect two offices (two different LAN) using routers cisco 1841 at both ends.

Currently the two cisco router are in working condition and refer the internet LAN clients. (making the NAT).

Can someone please tell us what is the easiest way to set up a VPN between two sites, so that LAN users to an office to access mail servers electronic/request to the office LAN.

I understand that I need IPSec Site to Site VPN (I think).

Anyonce can you please advise.

Kind regards.
```
s.nasheet wrote:
Hi ,
I need to connect two offices ( two different LAN's) together using cisco 1841 routers at both end.
Currently both cisco router are in working order and  acting as a internet gateway to the LAN clients. ( doing NAT).
Can anybody please advise what is the easiest method to configure VPN between two sites so that  LAN users at one office be able to access  the  email/application servers at the other LAN office.
I understand I need IPSec Site to Site VPN  ( i think).
Can anyonce please advise.
Regards.
```
Yes, you need a VPN site-to site. Start with this link which gives a number of examples to set up a VPN S2S between 2 routers Cisco.

http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/tech_configuration_examples_list.html#anchor16

Jon

VPN on 3 routers routing RV320

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for