VRF-lite, NAT and route-leak

Similar Questions

• Issue of ASA NAT and routing

  Hello

  I have a question about NAT and routing on the SAA. I'm relatively new to ASA and don't know if it works or not. I have a pool of public IP (209.x.x.x/28) that routes my ISP to the external interface of my ASA. IP was assigned address for the outside of the ASA is an address of 206.x.x.2/24 with a default GW of 206.x.x.1. I intend using NAT to allow my web/mail servers on the DMZ (192.168.x.x) use 209.x.x.x addresses. However, I do know how to make it work since I'm not arping on any interface for 209.x.x.x addresses as they will be sent to the 206.x.x.2 address by the ISP. Can I just set up a translation NAT (on the external interface?) of the 209.x.x.x on 192.168.x.x address and the ASA will figure it out?

  Thanks for the help.

  Todd

  The ASa will figure it out, he will answer ARP queries for all that he has set up in a "static" command As long as th PSIA routes 209.x.x.x directly to the ASA addresses then it should all work fine.

  You just need to add lines like the following:

  static (dmz, external) 209.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.255 192.168.x.x

  for each of your internal servers in the DMZ. Then an access-list to allow only HTTP/SMTP/etc through these addresses 209.x.x.x.

  list of allowed inbound tcp access any host 209.x.x.x eq smtp

  list of allowed inbound tcp access any host 209.y.y.y eq http

  Access-group interface incoming outside

• Based on the IOS VPN Lan-to-Lan (NAT and route map Questions)

  Hello world

  I worked on my review of CCNA security and I have a question about this stage

  LAN1 192.168.0.0/24---(routeur HQ)--10.10.10.0/30--(INTERNET)--20.20.20.0/30--(routeur Branch) - LAN2 192.168.1.0/24

  I use 10.10.10.0/30 and 20.20.20.0/30 networks assuming that these are public addresses (is just a laboratory).

  I read that if I want to make the VPN tunnel while I using NAT I must exclude valuable traffic from the NAT process so I look on the database of cisco for more help and I found this (look at the 3660 router configuration):

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008045a2d2.shtml#T1

  so, I applied this config for my routers, so the config is:

  IP nat inside source map route sheep interface fastEthernet0/1

  access list 110 deny ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access list 119 permit ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 any

  sheep allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 110

  I didn't really understand who is using the command route-map here, so I made this configuration:

  IP nat inside list sheep interface FastEthernet0/1

  sheep extended IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Licensing ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

  Two of them worked I could translate my LAN addresses to the public to address internet and also could establish the VPN tunnel. So my questions are:

  1. What is the purpose of the road-map command?

  2. What is the difference between these two configuration?

  3. which one I should use and in what cases?

  Thanks in advance

  Jose

  Jose,

  Very good questions and in fact no need to the road map it.

  Personally, I like using course maps because it allows much more flexibility than simply ACL setup, but in order to bypass the NAT source IPs, there is no need of route-maps and you can do this with the ACL directly.

  I personally always use road-maps just because I can (route-maps are cool) haha

  Route-maps are very useful in other scenarios where you need to put more of conditions or factors.

  Remember that it is almost always more than one method to accomplish a task... which is one of those cases.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• FVS336GV2 Nat or routing?

  I'm trying to secure our home network a little more until it gets 'tested '.

  I understand NAT, and routing. What I do not understand how the FVS336GV2 can do without NAT routing or if that's what he does.

  On my network - Mode WAN Configuration, I can choose "use NAT or classic routing between WAN & LAN interfaces?"

  What "Classic routing" done differently and it's better than NAT?

  I have Google had this, and found a lot of things on the hardware vs NAT and firewalls and software and more, but nothing as compared to NAT vs routing in the same device...

  I'm not sure you understand NAT or why it is necessary.

  Answer this question - do you need to share a single public ip address between several devices - or in the case of a double router WAN as the FVS336G, two public ip addresses?

  If the answer is Yes, then the classic routing isn't an option, you MUST use NAT, and you are likely to see a comparison between the two - they consider mutually exclusive options, which do different things.

  If you used the FVS336 as a router classic connected to the internet (and Yes, you can use this way), you need a public routable ip address for all devices on its LAN interface

• The AAA authentication and VRF-Lite

  Hello!

  I encountered a strange problem, when you use authentication Radius AAA and VRF-Lite.

  The setting is as follows. A/31 linknet is configured between PE and THIS (7206/g1 and C1812), where the EP sub-si is part of a MPLS VPN and VRF-Lite CE uses to maintain separate local services (where more than one VPN is used..).

  Access to the this, via telnet, console etc, will be authenticated by our RADIUS servers, based on the following configuration:

  --> Config start<>

  AAA new-model

  !

  !

  Group AA radius RADIUS-auth server

  Server x.x.4.23 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646

  Server x.x.7.139 auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646

  !

  AAA authentication login default group auth radius local

  enable AAA, enable authentication by default group RADIUS-auth

  ...

  touch of 1646-Server RADIUS host x.x.4.23 auth-port 1645 acct-port

  touch of 1646-Server RADIUS host x.x.7.139 auth-port 1645 acct-port

  ...

  source-interface IP vrf 10 RADIUS

  ---> Config ends<>

  The VRF-Lite instance is configured like this:

  ---> Config start<>

  VRF IP-10

  RD 65001:10

  ---> Config ends<>

  Now - if I remove the configuration VRF-Lite and use global routing on the CE (which is OK for a simple vpn installation), AAA/RADIUS authentication works very well. "" When I activate transfer ip vrf "10" on the interface of the outside and inside, AAA/RADIUS service is unable to reach the two defined servers.

  I compared the routing table when using VRF-Lite and global routing, and they are identical. All roads are correctly imported via BGP, and the service as a whole operates without problem, in other words, the AAA/RADIUS part is the only service does not.

  It may be necessary to include a vrf-transfer command in the config of Group server as follows:

  AAA radius RADIUS-auth server group

  Server-private x.x.x.x auth-port 1645 acct-port

  1646 key ww

  IP vrf forwarding 10

  See the document below for more details:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/docs/iOS/12_4/secure/configuration/guide/hvrfaaa.html

• Order of procedure SonicWALL for routing, NAT and policies

  I'm confused on the prescription that the sonicwall verifies a package.  The way I heard the order, it will:

  (1) check against the access rules,

  (2) check against NAT Polies

  (3) check the routing.

  Installation program:

  Subnet point of VPN endpoint - Internet - SW NSA 2400 (VPN) - sub-network B (from C subnet)

  A subnet is 10.1.100.x/24

  Subnet B is consists of three IPs, 192.168.99.4,.50, and 109.

  Subnet C is contains the host IPs 192.168.13.4,.50, and 109.

  I VPN configured to allow traffic from 10.1.100.x to the hosts on the subnet B, what NAT and the host subnet C.  This method works more large, is not a problem.

  I need to reduce access to certain ports.  Once I set access restrictions in the port, the firewall blocks ALL.

  When I look at a screenshot of packets when traffic is blocked, I see the following:

  Source 10.1.100.5--> 192.168.99.4 accepted

  Source 10.1.100.5--> 192.168.13.4 refused.

  Block of code indicates that it is because of politics.  However the policy review should have been checked and checked already.  If I change the VPN policy to represent both sides of the NAT (ie. 192.168.99.4 and 192.168.13.4) then passes the traffic.

  If anyone can explain what is happening?

  I tried to look through some KB SonicWall has publicly available articles. But I did not see anything that doesn't seem to help. In this case, I think you might want to give SonicWall support a call.

  https://support.software.Dell.com/manage-service-request

  They can help to look over your configurations and see if we have to make changes. They should also be able to answer your technical questions about how the packets are received or managed.

• DMVPN and VRF Lite

  Someone at - it an example of use of several networks DMVPN and VRF (no MPLS) interfaces

  I have a requirment to use a common link to transmit three talking about networks isolated to the Hub as encrypted data. It could be VTI doesn't bother me, but I can't use MPLS.

  Thank you

  Hello

  "back in the day", I made this config:

  of http://isamology.blogspot.com/2010/01/IPSec-and-vrfs-so-who-faire-vrf.html

  But normally, I guess you've seen this:
  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6660/prod_white_paper0900aecd8034be03_ps6658_Products_White_Paper.html

  Same principles apply to the VRF lite little matter DMVPN/VTI/GREoIPsec configuration.

  tunnel vrf VRF door =

  IP vrf forwarding = inside the VRF

  Now, if you add the cheat of Nico (for isakmp profiles) sheet especially if necessary, you should be all set.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-13524

  Marcin

• IPSec Tunnel between Cisco 2801 and Netscren 50 with NAT and static

  Hello

  My problem isn't really the IPSec connection between two devices (it is already done...) But my problem is that I have a mail server on the site of Cisco, who have a static NAT from inside to outside. Due to the static NAT, I do not see the server in the VPN tunnel. I found a document that almost describes the problem:

  "Configuration of a router IPSEC Tunnel private-to-private network with NAT and static" (Document ID 14144)

  NAT takes place before the encryption verification!

  In this document, the solution is 'routing policy' using the loopback interface. But, how can I handle this with the Netscreen firewall. Someone has an idea?

  Thanks for any help

  Best regards

  Heiko

  Hello

  Try to change your static NAT with static NAT based policy.

  That is to say the static NAT should not be applicable for VPN traffic

  permissible static route map 1

  corresponds to the IP 104

  access-list 104 refuse host ip 10.1.110.10 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0

  access-list 104 allow the host ip 10.1.110.10 all

  IP nat inside source static 10.1.110.10 81.222.33.90 map of static route

  HTH

  Kind regards

  GE.

• Site to Site between ASA VPN connection and router 2800

  I'm trying to get a L2L VPN working between a ASA code 8.4 and a 2800 on 12.4.

  I first saw the following errors in the debug logs on the side of the ASA:

  Error message % PIX | ASA-6-713219: KEY-GAIN message queues to deal with when
  ITS P1 is complete.

  I see the following on the end of 2800:

  ISAKMP: (0): treatment charge useful vendor id
  ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 157
  ISAKMP: (0): provider ID is NAT - T v3
  ISAKMP: (0): treatment charge useful vendor id
  ISAKMP: (0): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 69
  ISAKMP (0): provider ID is NAT - T RFC 3947
  ISAKMP: (0): treatment charge useful vendor id
  ISAKMP: (0): treatment of frag vendor id IKE payload
  ISAKMP: (0): IKE Fragmentation support not enabled
  ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
  ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM1

  ISAKMP: (0): built NAT - T of the seller-rfc3947 ID
  ISAKMP: (0): send package to x.x.x.x my_port 500 peer_po0 (R) MM_SA_SETUP
  ISAKMP: (0): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.
  ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
  ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM1 = IKE_R_MM2

  ISAKMP (0): packet received from x.x.x.x dport 500 sports global (R)

  MM_SA_SETUP
  ISAKMP: (0): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
  ISAKMP: (0): former State = new State IKE_R_MM2 = IKE_R_MM3

  ISAKMP: (0): processing KE payload. Message ID = 0
  ISAKMP: (0): processing NONCE payload. Message ID = 0
  ISAKMP: (0): found peer pre-shared key x.x.x.x corresponding
  ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
  ISAKMP: (2345): provider ID is the unit
  ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
  ISAKMP: (2345): provider ID seems the unit/DPD but major incompatibility of 54
  ISAKMP: (2345): provider ID is XAUTH
  ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
  ISAKMP: (2345): addressing another box of IOS!
  ISAKMP: (2345): treatment charge useful vendor id
  ISAKMP: (2345): vendor ID seems the unit/DPD but hash mismatch
  ISAKMP: receives the payload type 20
  ISAKMP (2345): sound not hash no match - this node outside NAT
  ISAKMP: receives the payload type 20
  ISAKMP (2345): no NAT found for oneself or peer
  ISAKMP: (2345): entry = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
  ISAKMP: (2345): former State = new State IKE_R_MM3 = IKE_R_MM3

  ISAKMP: (2345): sending package x.x.x.x my_port Exchange 500 500 (R)

  MM_KEY_EXCH

  ----------

  This is part of the configuration of the ASA:

  network of the ABCD object
  10.20.30.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
   
  network of the ABCD-Net object
  172.16.10.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
   
  cry-map-77-ip object-group XXXX object abc-site_Network allowed extended access list
   
  access list abc-site extended permitted ip object-group XXXX object abc-site_Network
   
  ip access list of abc-site allowed extended object abc-site_Network object-group XXXX-60
   
  NAT (any, any) static source 20 XXXX XXXX-20 destination static abc-site_Network abc-site_Network
   
  NAT (any, any) static source 20 XXXX XXXX-20 destination static abc-site_Network abc-site_Network
   
  XXXX-20
   
  object-group network XXXX-20
  ABCD-Net network object
  object-abcd-Int-Net Group
   
  XXXX_127
   
  object-group network XXXX-20
  ABCD-Net network object
  object-abcd-Int-Net Group
   
  ip access list of abc-site allowed extended object abc-site_Network object-group XXXX-60
   
   
  Crypto card off-map-44 11 match address cry-map-77
  card crypto out-map-44 11 counterpart set 62.73.52.xxx
  card crypto out-map-44 11 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

  cry-map-77-ip object-group XXXX object abc-site_Network allowed extended access list

  Crypto card off-map-44 11 match address cry-map-77
  card crypto out-map-44 11 counterpart set 62.73.52.xxx
  card crypto out-map-44 11 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

  card crypto out-map-44 11 set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA ikev1

  object-group network XXXX
  ABCD-Net network object
  object-abcd-Int-Net Group

  ------------------------

  Here is a part of the 2800:

  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  ISAKMP crypto key r2374923 address 72.15.21.xxx
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  !
  card crypto cry-map-1 1 ipsec-isakmp
  the value of 72.15.21.xxx peer
  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
  match address VPN
  !
  type of class-card inspect match class-map-vpn
  game group-access 100
  type of class-card inspect cm-inspect-1 correspondence
  group-access name inside-out game
  type of class-card inspect correspondence cm-inspect-2
  match the name of group-access outside
  !
  !
  type of policy-card inspect policy-map-inspect
  class type inspect cm-inspect-1
  inspect
  class class by default
  drop
   
  type of policy-card inspect policy-map-inspect-2
  class type inspect class-map-vpn
  inspect
  class type inspect cm-inspect-2
  class class by default
  drop
  !

  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  IP address 74.25.89.xxx 255.255.255.252
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  security of the outside Member area
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  crypto cry-card-1 card
  !
  interface FastEthernet1
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  IP nat inside source overload map route route-map-1 interface FastEthernet0
  !
  IP access-list extended inside-out
  IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any
  IP nat - acl extended access list
  deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  deny ip 0.0.255.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  refuse the 10.10.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
  refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
  refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
  refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255
  refuse the 172.16.10.0 ip 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  allow an ip
  outside extended IP access list
  allow an ip
  list of IP - VPN access scope
  IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
  IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
  IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
  IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255
  IP 172.16.10.0 allow 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 10.200.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255 ip permit 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  ip licensing 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 23 allow 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 23 allow 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 23 allow 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 123 note category class-map-LCA-4 = 0
  access-list 123 allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 123 allow ip 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 123 allow ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 123 allow ip 0.0.255.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 123 allow ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.200.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 28.20.14.xxx.0.0 0.0.255.255
  access-list 123 allow ip 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  !
  !
  !

  !
  route-map-1 allowed route map 1
  match the IP nat - acl
  !

  Hello

  I quickly browsed your config and I could notice is

  your game of transformation (iskamp) on SAA and router are not the same, try to configure the same on both sides.

  in the statement of the ASA NAT you gave (any, any) try to give the name of the interface instead of a whole.

• Wireless connection unavailable on laptop, but shows all ok on pc and router

  I was at Midway through a conversation today on msn when my wireless connection (on my laptop) disappeared. I checked my pc and everything seems ok, here, my netgear router shows that everything is fine. When I click on 'Find a wireless network' his party! I can access the net very well by plugging it but as soon as I go wireless, I still lost.

  Tried to connect manually - says network with that name already there
  Tried to re start all
  All cables checked

  It's a laptop Toshiba L300
  Virgin cable broadband
  Router NETGEAR Wireless

  everything works fine as long as I'm using the cables.

  I only had my laptop and router wireless for a month.

  Please any other ideas what to do, I really need to be wireless for work as soon as possible

  Hello severina_falls,

  Thanks for posting on the Microsoft answers Community Forum.

  I have some suggestions for you to see if we can provide you with your wireless connection.

  (1) check that the WiFi switch is on on the front panel of your laptop. It is a quick check
  (2) Recycle the router wireless on and outside. Wait at least one minute, then turn it back on. Retest with your wireless network.
  (3) are getting you the error messages in the case where connects to deal with your wireless connection?
  To join the event logs: click on the Start button, right-click computer, click on manage.
  If you receive a notification of user account control , simply click on continue.
  Double-click Event Viewer. Study summary of the the event logs for errors dealing with wireless.
  (4) use System Restore to get your iIf wireless upward and running, you have a System Restore Point that was before starting the problem with your wireless network.
  Use the following KB to get the procedure on the system restore.
  936212 KB - how to repair the operating system and how to restore the configuration of the operating system to an earlier point in time in Windows Vista
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/936212

  If please post again and let us know if it helped to solve your problem or if you need further assistance.

  Sincerely, Marilyn
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Clarification of authentication PIX NAT and BGP

  Hi all

  I did some tests on PIX and crossing this area of BGP traffic.

  When I configure the PIX to do no config NAT (NAT 0) and configure a BGP session between two routers (one inside) and the other on the outside net everything works fine.

  When I configure BGP authentication, I may add the keyword "norandomseq" NAT and STATIC commands cause BGP auth embedded TCP header for authentication information. It's OK.

  But when I reconfigure the PIX to make real NAT between the inside and the outside network and reconfigure my routers, BGP session doesn't happen if BGP authentication has been disabled. If I enable authentication BGP, I had errors of MD5 authentication on routers. (Note "norandomseq" is enabled for NAT and STATIC instructions)

  Now my question is BGP unsupported for NAT on PIX sessions? (for my tests, it has worked for NAT 0 config, also all the examples that I always found working with NAT 0 config)

  I think the problem is that the TCP pseudo-header changes to the NAT device and therefore it will never work right? Or is there any correction internal bgp which should fix this? I think it's almost impossible that this is known with the password simple bgp, right?

  Concerning

  Michael

  Your reasoning is dead the. BGP authentication works like this: the sending peer BGP takes and MD5 hash of the TCP header before sending the package and includes this hash in the TCP header option. The BGP receiver receives the packet and also did a MD5 hash of the TCP header. Then, it compares its value to the value sent by the sender of BGP. If they match, all right. If they fail, the packet is ignored and you get error messages, did you see.

  Because the NAT will change the address source TCP, the TCP header will be changed which should bring a different MD5 hash for the receiver that the sender originally sent.

  BGP peer by a PIX authtenticatio is supported only in a Nat 0 or static identity with the norandomseq option is enabled.

  Make sense?

  Scott

• LAN to lan vpn between ASA and router 7200

  Hi friends,

  I need to configure the lan to lan between ASA vpn (remote location) and router 7200 (on our network).

  <7200 router="" (ip="" add:="" 10.10.5.2)="">-(Internet) -<(IP add:="" 192.168.12.2)="" asa(5510)="">---192.135.5.0/24 network

  I will have the following configuration:

  7200 router:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 80

  the enc

  AUTH pre-shared

  Group 1

  life 3600

  ISAKMP crypto key cisco123 address 192.168.12.2

  Cryto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtrans

  map VPNTunnel 80 ipsec-isakmp crypto

  defined by peer 192.168.12.2

  game of transformation-VPNtrans

  match address 110

  int fa0/0

  IP add 10.10.5.2 255.255.255.192

  IP virtual-reassembly

  no ip route cache

  Speed 100

  full duplex

  card crypto VPNTunnel

  access-list 110 permit ip any 192.135.5.0 0.0.0.255

  ASA:

  int e0/0

  nameif inside

  security-level 100

  192.135.5.254 Add IP 255.255.255.0

  int e0/1

  nameif outside

  security-level 0

  IP add 192.168.12.2 255.255.255.240

  access-list ACL extended ip 192.135.5.0 allow 255.255.255.0 any

  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0.0 192.168.12.3 1

  "pre-shared key auth" ISAKMP policy 10

  ISAKMP policy 10-enc

  ISAKMP policy 10 md5 hash

  10 1 ISAKMP policy group

  ISAKMP duration strategy of life 10-3600

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac VPNtran

  card crypto VPN 10 matches the ACL address

  card crypto VPN 10 set peer 10.10.5.2

  card crypto VPN 10 the transform-set VPNtran value

  tunnel-group 10.10.5.2 type ipsec-l2l

  IPSec-attributes of type tunnel-group 10.10.5.2

  cisco123 pre-shared key

  card crypto VPN outside interface

  ISAKMP allows outside

  dhcpd address 192.135.5.1 - 192.135.5.250 inside

  dhcpd dns 172.15.4.5 172.15.4.6

  dhcpd wins 172.15.76.5 172.15.74.5

  dhcpd lease 14400

  dhcpd ping_timeout 500

  dhcpd allow inside

  Please check the configuration, please correct me if I missed something. I'm in a critical situation at the moment...

  Please advise...

  Thank you very much...

  Where it fails at the present time?

  Can you share out of after trying to establish the VPN tunnel:

  See the isa scream his

  See the ipsec scream his

  Please also run the following debug to see where it is a failure:

  debugging cry isa

  debugging ipsec cry

• Private of IPSec VPN-private network between ASA and router

  Hello community,

  This is first time for me to configure IPSec VPN between ASA and router. I have an ASA 5540 at Headquarters and 877 router to EH Branch

  Headquarters ASA summary.

  Peer IP: 111.111.111.111

  Local network: 10.0.0.0

  Branch

  Peer IP: 123.123.123.123

  LAN: 192.168.1.0/24

  Please can someone help me set up the vpn.

  Hello

  This guide covers exactly what you need:

  Establishment of ASDM and SDM - http://www.netcraftsmen.net/resources/archived-articles/273.html

  Tunnel VPN - ASA to the router configuration:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#ASDM

  Kind regards

  Jimmy

• Client certificate and router WebVPN

  Hello!

  In my test harness I can not to run my webvpn configuration =.

  I have several components: AD MS, MS CS (but without NDE), 2911 router and client computer. Client and router have a certificate of MS CS. In my setup I use certificate or aaa (LDAP) authentication and authentication work aaa good. But the client certificate authentication does not work. And my internal https services do not work too--"no certificate or invalid", but this strange because I imported the CA certificate for that.

  Can you help me it work?

  My version of 2911:

  Cisco IOS software, software C2900 (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1 (3) T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

  My Config:

  AAA authentication login webvpn group local ldap

  IP local pool webvpn 192.168.200.1 192.168.200.254

  bind authenticates root-dn cn = webvpn, OU = team, dc = domain, dc = com password [email protected]/ * /.

  WebVPN vpn gateway

  IP address port 4443

  SSL root-ca trustpoint

  development

  !

  WebVPN install svc flash0:/webvpn/anyconnect-dart-win-2.5.3055-k9.pkg sequence 1

  !

  employee framework WebVPN

  SSL authentication check all

  !

  connection message 'Portal VPN'

  !

  the policy group peche1

  List of URLS "on the inside".

  functions compatible svc

  filter VPN SPLIT tunnel

  SVC-pool of addresses "webvpn" netmask 255.255.255.0

  SVC by default-domain "domain.com".

  SVC Dungeon-client-installed

  SVC split dns "domain.com".

  SVC split include 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0

  SVC-Server primary dns 192.168.1.1

  SVC-Server secondary dns 192.168.1.2

  Citrix enabled

  virtual-model 1

  strategy-group-by default peche1

  AAA authentication list webvpn

  vpn gateway

  authentication certificate

  user name - sign up

  root CA trustpoint-AC

  User location flash0 profile: / userprof

  development

  !

  Crypto pki trustpoint root-ca

  Terminal registration

  revocation checking no

  rsakeypair root-ca

  !

  I imported with CA pkcs12 certificate.

  My debug (it happened so I am trying to access my webvpn portal and I choose my certificate of MS CS for access)

  5 Jun 11:22:39: WV: validated_tp: cert_username: matched_ctx:

  5 Jun 11:22:39: WV: could not get opssl appinfo sslvpn

  5 Jun 11:22:39: WV: could not get opssl appinfo sslvpn

  5 Jun 11:22:39: WV: error: no certificate validated for the customer

  Can someone explain to me why it does not work?

  Resolved by the update IOS - version 15.2 (4) M2.

  Concerning

• NAT and VMware View

  I am

  try again using VMware View, where a person uses a VPN to

  connect to my view of the Park, but my connection to the server is running NAT, and

  the client tries to connect in my Park he cannot get the virtual

  machine. Are there restrictions? Any tips?

  If you have found this information useful, please consider awarding points to 'Correct' or 'Useful'*.

  Exactly THAT PCOIP do not work on the Security server.  If your using VPN and connect to a broker internal conection it should work good as new NAT could shake things.    Should be a simple test however.

  If you have found this device or any other useful post please consider the use of buttons useful/correct to award points

  Twitter: http://twitter.com/mittim12