What CPU for Photoshop?

I find a lot of slow down to some photoshop work, I do my laptop. The files end up in 100G and tampering takes foever, in Lightroom, as well as in Photoshop. So I'm shopping for a more powerful desktop computer.

Should I insist on speed (2.6 MHz vs 2.2.MHZ for example), or memory memory or video, video card, or the speed of the system Bus, or cache processor, etc... he get crazy! and frustrating.

So, I found basically 2 systems

A: with six cores AMD Phenom II 1035 T

It is 2.6 MHz with 8GB

Graphics card is ATI Radeon HD 5770 with 1 GB dedicated memory

B: with processor i7-860 image, also with 8 GB

It is at 2.8 GHz with Hyper-Threading and Turbo Boost technology technology

Video card is the same that is ATI Radeon HD 5770 with 1 GB dedicated memory

What to do?

System said as his BUS system at 4000 MHz, but I have never seen it before

Thanks for any help, P

If you think that up to now, consider the i7 920 instead of the 860. Different platforms (chipset) and Setup is more favourable in the long term. See the following article:

http://www.TomsHardware.com/Forum/266032-28-TomsHardware

I have the four AMD Athlon II core. It's pretty fast and as Noel pointed multicores give excellent performance in Photoshop. But the difference here is this: The Intels are two real core + virtual kernel, a core i7 4 leads as a unit of 8 cores. There is a trade-off, but I expect that at least, a link between the 6 core AMD and Intel 4 + 4, but I wouldn't be surprised to find the edging from Intel to AMD.

It would be nice for you to search Anandtech and Tom Harware for a vision clear opportunities and trade-offs. Personally, I worked with the i7 Intel, doing work on overclocking app. It's devilishly one piece of silicon, and when I finally had the time to run CS4 as a test on one platform. She performed superbly, even with marginal video cards (nVidia 7000 series).

And I have not had opportunities memory for the Intel i7.

Overall, however, it seems that AMD is more flexible for upgrades. The way feels better, more homogeneous than the Intel. Breaking the 800 series of the measure and the help of a another plug for each guarantee mismatch on the line. AMD, which avoids right from the start.

Tags: Photoshop

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for

  • Dv6 - 3217CL: DV6 - 3217CL Blu Ray Playback Choopy now

    So I will add to woes for Blu Ray playback. This laptop can play Blu Rays without any problem. After a motherboard failure and replacement, the video playback is now rough at best. It read DVDs without problem but the Blu Ray performance is terrible.

  • Reference VI opened in an executable function

    Hi all Is it possible to call a Subvi (which, in itself, called other auxiliary screws not included in the executable source files) from an executable file (LabVIEW 2011). I have no problem calling the sub - VI via "Open Reference VI" when runing the

  • I can turn on the firewall, the error is "error code 0 * 80070422"»

    I'm in trouble with conect to the Internet, my firewall can not turn on although I try my best, please help me, these days will be in the darkness with me because of boredom! IE does not, CHrome does not, Opera does not work! just in trouble!

  • VOIP and cisco ISA570

    So we have a voip hosted with our ISP provider solution and currently we connect to our ISP with a Cisco ISA570.  We had zero problems with the phone system and I'm curious to know why I didn't need to open all ports (5060, etc.) for our phones work

  • Device null under devices hidden in Device Manager

    Hello I installed Windows 7 Professional on my system which is about 3 years old. He has a mother M2N32-SLI Asus with a processor AMD 6400 +. The machine works well, but during the installation of Windows 7, the Null device under the devices hidden i