Why my raws look different when I view in Adobe Bridge/Adobe Camera Raw and digital P guns

Similar Questions

• When I view my Photos, they have a place and a date. How can I print them with that on them?

  When I view my Photos, they have a place and a date. How can I print them with that on them?

  You want to print the information on the image itself?  To do this, you will need to export the picture on the desk and edit it with a 3rd party image editor that supports the text and layers:

  Some Image editors that support layers and text:

  
  

  Photoshop Elements for Mac 11 - $79

  GraphicConverter - $40
  The Rainbow painter - $30

  Photos of affinity- $50

  FX Photo Studio - $30

  Inpaint - $20
  Imaging - $38
  Acorn - $50

  Pixelmator - $60

  Seashore - free

  GIMP for Mac - free (Yosemite & Mavericks only)

  

• Titles of cards look different when published

  Here's what's happening. I created my page layout and cards using custom fonts. The problem is I get them to look the way I want to that they in the model available, but when I publish the application to test display spacing is different on the iPad. And still more the Android looks different from that of the iPad and the model of provision. Here are a few screen grabs to explain:

  Here's what they look like in the layout model.

  

  And here's what the iPad ends up looking like to. just to be clear. The icons and the "ambitconnection" are integrated into the image of the map.

  

  It seems that since my implementation model is defined on the iPad that it should look exactly like this when I publish to the iPad. Any thoughts on why this is happening?

  Hi, ambitappa77373764, Keith,.

  As Nathan has pointed out, there are a few OS - differences that lead to differences in the way in which the text is rendered. This is especially true for values less than 1.1.

  The only current workaround is to use the main values of 1.1 or more and adjust your parameters of fonts in a glyph Editor to create the leader more tight for you font.

  Andrei

• In FF4, why my site is different when www is omitted

  My site is different when I use www in the address and when I omit www. Look at http://www.dynapipe.co.uk and http://dynapipe.co.uk.

  This does not happen with FF3 or IE7, 8 or 9 or Google Chrome, only FF4

  Try to reset the Zoom factor on each of these pages, a 'domain' is probably zoomed in or out.

  https://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/page+zoom

• Why my site look different in Internet Explorer

  Hello there I am currently working on an eportfolio for school, but when you use internet explore my navigation bars look like this

  

  However, in google chrome, it looks like this

  

  Please help me I have used cs6 and this is my website http://jacks-eportfolio.site90.net/

  Please let me know.

  The borders of EI are caused by a bit of css that IE adds default. Put this in your css to remove it...

  an img {}

  border: none;

  }

  Run the validator to http://validator.w3.org to find and fix errors in your page html. Don't worry those shown in your javascript, those which are caused by DWs default .js and can be ignored. If you want to that they if go away, you can put the script in an external .js file and link to him in theof the page.

  You also use tables and APDivs to your layout that should be avoided, but that has nothing to do with your current menu problem.

• Why my video look different after have exported them to AfterEffects?

  I made a few changes to a video legacy, and after the export of the video, I noticed that the video looked a little less dynamic compared to the origin of the film. So I compared, and of course the exported video has been washed (whitish) upwards a little search in the comparison. Its very subtle, but still noticeable to me. So I thought that maybe it's an effect I did changed the images.

  So, I started above and downloaded the original file in a new project. Then without doing one thing, I exported it directly on my desk. The sequence was still different. I also double and triple checked that they are both the same files. (Quicktime MIV) Is there something I missed when exporting? I will say that this is my first attempt in a video export. I looked at a few tutorials and they seem not to be something different. I hope you guys can help.
  Thank you

  inheritance changes the video permanently, it creates a gamma tag as 'Hi', if your Player supports, I should be read

  with the gamma setting. This is why AE Profile Converter utility is usually the answer because it "Burns" in the right color and gamma.

  Since most of the video is rec.709, 16-235 and 0-255 to create different looks and darkens the image so that when downloaded on youtube, when youtube them brightened again, (which is bad, but good), they come out perfect.

  instructions for installation color profile Converter:

  set the input to rec.709 profile, 16-235

  and the output profile to rec.709 "no numbers here.

  This will darken your image.

  I also have gamma Lut that convert 2.2 to 1.8 and vice versa with the Dispcal free software.

• Why the site looks different in different browsers?

  Hello

  I coded my site in Dreamweaver CS4 and let it go:

  http://www.lidesign.cc

  The problem is that it seems perfect in Firefox, Safari, Opera, but when I open it in Explorer 7, a line appeared after the header and also there is no space between paragraphs. Pourriez me someone help and tell why it is so? I also enclose the picture, how it looks in Explorer 7:

  

  Here's what it looks like in Safari and other browsers:

  

  Thank you vey much in advance!

  You have a few CSS errors.

  lidesign.cc%2Findex.html http://Jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/Validator?Profile=CSS21&Warning=0&URI=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.

  You have a bit of unnecessary code in your CSS.  To remove the borders of images and linked images, you need only 2 lines of code:

  / * NO BORDERS ON IMAGES * /.

  IMG {border: none}

  an img {border: none ;}}

  You can remove the rest of the present:

  a: link {img
  border: none;
  border-style: none;
  text-decoration: none;
  }
     
  a: vlink img {}
  border: none;
  border-style: none;
  text-decoration: none;
  }
     
  a: for more img {}
  border: none;
  border-style: none;
  text-decoration: none;
  }

  If your layout does not behave in Internet Explorer, add conditional comments between theandTags of your documents as follows.

  Hope this helps,

  Nancy O.
  ALT-Web Design & Publishing
  Web | Graphics | Print | Media specialists
  http://ALT-Web.com/
  http://Twitter.com/ALTWEB
  http://ALT-Web.blogspot.com

• Why the sound is different when the project is exported?

  Hi all. It's me again. Because you are always so useful, I need your help with another problem. I just finished a wedding, publishing and towards the end of the ceremony, the sound is fine when you work in Final Cut, but when I export, the game becomes heavy and distorted. Any suggestions on why this is happening and what to do? I've never had this happen before. It is a client, and to do here tomorrow afternoon at the latest. Thanks for your help!

  We have seen that this several times here on the forum but it's never happened to me. I believe that the proposed solution was to remove the shape clip your scenario and replace it form the browser; Make sure that the audio in the browser reference file is good before do you. You can export a range of test history.

  You can also try to delete the files of the project.

  It may take a few hours more for fans to offer other suggestions.

• Why CRLF are treated differently when called via bridgetalk?

  I stumbled upon another mystery: when I run a script directly in ExtendScript, he interpreters '\r' as a CRLF. Yet, when I called him by bridgetalk, the '\r' was left as text.

  This strange behavior is if I set the target to photoshop or not. Can someone tell me why please?

  Here's the unit test (CS6, Windows 10)

  -L' script call:

  #target bridge

  var bt = new BridgeTalk;
  BT. Target = "photoshop."
  var myPath = "~ / Desktop/testCarriageReturnSubstitution.jsx ';"
  var ScriptFile = new queue (myPath);
  fOpen var = scriptFile.open ('r');
  script var = scriptFile.read ();
  $.writeln (script);
  BT. Body = script;

  BT. Send();

  -Test script:

  #target photoshop

  var badString = ' \rTitle\rCity, State - USA December 2015 ";

  var nouvelleChaine = badString.replace ('\n', "\n");

  $.writeln (badString);

  $.writeln (newString);

  The runtime directly via ExtendScript result:

  Title

  City, State - USA December 2015

  Result: not defined

  Result when called via the calling script:

  Result: true

  \rTitle\rCity, State - USA December 2015

  Thank you

  / Tim

  Thank you, Uwe for responding! I tried that before posting, and the result was '\\r '. It seems bridgetalk converts these escape characters to the text.

  I found another thread (Re: \n doesn't work does not correctly) addressing the question, pointing way back to CS2 times! Wonder why Adobe does not solve the problem, and/or documenting this bug to save us some headaches, or maybe they he documented in a dark place.

  Workaround to this problem is to use decodeURI and use the hexadecimal code for these special characters. In my original unit test, I have changed the script photoshop for the following:

  #target photoshop
  var title = "title text";
  var CityState = "San Francisco, California";
  var badString = ' \r'+Title+'\r'+CityState;
  var goodString is decodeURI (Title + "%0d" + CityState);.

  $.writeln (' string bad encoding: ', badString);
  $.writeln (' string right encoding: ', goodString);

  Result:

  A string of bad encoding: \rTitle Text\rSan Francisco, California

  Right channel coding: title text

  San Francisco, California

• Why my images look blurry when opened in photoshop?

  Hello! I was wondering if I could get help with a problem, I received yesterday.

  Before yesterday morning, my photoshop worked just fine but then yesterday morning when I opened this image.

  

  It would look like this

  

  instead of resembling the first picture above, the thing is when I export the image to photoshop as a png, jpeg or any other it seems normal again like that.

  

  This is the first time, this never happened, so I'm not really sure what to do.

  I use photoshop cs6 and I have also uninstall and reinstall photoshop about 2 times now, but it does not

  so, if anyone can help me would be great.

  Thank you.

  Pattern of the image in Photoshop seems less pronounced than its optimized web (for example, JPEG) and original counterpart, where my assumption of accelerated corruption video driver.

• Why my picture look posterized when I open it in CS6?

  When you open an image in CS6, either the bridge or from the file, open the CS6, they have that look of Posterization 60's on most of the image. The settings are 8-bit, RGB, have not changed the settings and even reinstalled CS6 on the CS6 old, but still do. Was going well for a long time, just to start doing so. I recently upgraded to OnOne Perfect 7 layers. This program has had a history of bugginess, I can remove it. But first of all, I was hoping there was some simple fix that you may know.  Thank you

  Have you tried to reset the preferences?

  Reset preferences:

  http://forums.Adobe.com/thread/375776

  (1) close the program, and then press Ctrl + Alt + Shift / Cmd + Option + shift during startup (not reversible)

  or

  (2) move the folder. See:

  http://www.Bugge.com/family-and-friends/Illy/Illy.html

• Why the color looks different in the iOS overview compared to Photoshop app?

  All the colors in my different design in the iOS overview compared to Photoshop application.  For example, all the colors seem muted, dull, or the overall tint seems different.

  We have fixed some bugs related to the accuracy of the colors.  To get the patch, install the latest updates of Photoshop CC 2015. If you have Photoshop 2015.1 and you still see the problem, please contact us at [email protected].

• Site looks different when editing on another computer

  Hi all

  I have Adobe CS4 on my laptop and created my Web site on this machine. A co-worker has also CS4 on their machine. I downloaded our website to their machine so that the person can do some changes.  However, when I open a page on their site machine seems all wrong. The divs are not published where it should and things don't align.  I downloaded the entire site (css files), but it's like they css is not connected.  Is there something special that needs to be done on the computer of your colleagues?

  Thank you

  Chris

  No, dreamweaver is the perfect Companion for making web pages. Its when inexperienced amateurs build a site and then get stuck. Through just a couple of the posts in this forum and you'll see what I mean. DW is great for people who know how to use it. A lot of newbies is on a web site or download some model and then all of a sudden they're in over their heads

  Users need to take a test html and css base before you can purchase/download a model online. They end up right here ask questions even when

• my audio waveform looks different when I put it in the timeline?

  IM using a song for a lyrical video and im trying to align things with the pace but my calendar shows not only the full waveform as it does in the preview

  The drop in the part of the sequence.  Next to the name of the sequence.

• Combining the two accounts? And why the CC says 'install' when I've already subscribed to the app (LR) and it is already installed?

  Hi guys,.

  Relationship problems (which I have had for years).

  (1) I have two accounts for some reason any under two separate addresses.  So to start, I want to combine them, how?

  (2) I agree with the case of photography for $ 9.99.  When I am connected, CC sees that Photoshop is installed and up to date (or other), but next to Lightroom, it says "install".  In addition to being just bad, I worry that I'm missing updates that CC doesn't even know that I have installed the application.

  Help, please.

  Thank you...

  Billnm know that you post to a public forum.  If you want to manage your subscription accounts then please contact our support contact the customer serviceteam.

  The version of Lightroom available via creative application Cloud Desktop is licensed differently than the version installed with a perpetual serial number.  I would recommend the disconnection of the current installation of Photoshop Lightroom and then put it back through the application of Creative Cloud Desktop.  You can find more details about the uninstall and install process to Creative Cloud help | Install, update, or uninstall applications.