Why PC waste time

Similar Questions

• Wasting time contributors

  I've only been help here for a month, but as the other contributors are nice people away from polite to complain about people wasting everyone's time, I'll tell you this, however.

  Please, if you have not actually need because a reply post here like a decent answer to a technical training or technical question takes the time to prepare and loses time to stakeholders and keeps us from helping those with a real need to have their problems solved .

  Too many messages are responded to only to the author of the question appearingly not to ever go back to check what is the response and God forbid, marking as resolved issue seems to be much too mentally taxing for many of you, but of course it is not only his laziness.

  Contrary to what you may think, speakers here are unconnected with the company Adobe volunteers - we receive free subscriptions to creative cloud. Now play just ask only questions you need answers to and be civilized enough comeback and read the answers given and if it is correct, close the question by marking, he responded correctly.

  I can't speak for others, but I myself store the username of everyone I try to help who disappears without trace in a SQL Server database and do not consider helping a second time on the grounds that the abuse of a free service justifies exclusion of further assistance in the future.

  Terri

  
  

  [In double thread. See: wasting time of contributors. Position locked by Mod]
  

  subject has been discussed in the main forum for Photoshop - if you are interested please post

• WHY JOBS FIVE TIMES LARGER WHEN OPEN?

  WHY JOBS FIVE TIMES LARGER WHEN OPEN? Closed printing 3Mo contest; 20.6 mg open, with the size of the document of 8 x 10 to 300 dpi.

  My sister 'amateur' digitized pictures on Epson 4490 and sent... 35 to 50 KB each. I complained that these stamps must be analyzed on larger size once again.

  She says, open them in PS. Today, there are 600 kb 3x3@300dpi.  I '"the professional almost' feel like a fool. What is the truth. Thank you 1 million of your time & entry. Carol Ann Dwyer.

  I was curious myself, I did a little research. I normally do not hand off files to others, so this isn't a problem, but if this question comes up again I can explain it.

  Here is the difference:

  «For the sake of simplicity, let's just deal with the final image after turning, he converted and do any cropping.» This image, opening in Photoshop, has a size of file 'open' or 'work', as seen in the section control panel size Image above. However, when you come to save the final image, you will need to decide about the compression of files.  Generally you will be save the image in TIFF format, which may have a compression or not at all, or as a JPEG file, which will always be compression.  If the image has been saved with the downsizing, you notice that the backup image has a file size much smaller than what it was when it was opened.  Think of this as 'saved' or 'compressed' file size.

  The problem comes when you look at an image that has been stored on your hard drive and you must decide what the 'open' or 'work' of the file size is the size of the 'open' file that account when you send an image to a client. »

  You open the file and look in the box about the size of the Image to see open size or work.

  

• I did what he asked but when I tried to connect it told me that there is no internet connection and that it cannot connect to adobe that's why I came here to ask why he wasted my time, if she's not going to let me try the tests?

  I downloaded the app and I created an adobe account and he is already committed to try the app trial. When I tried to connect, it told me that there is no internet connection when in fact it is really! I waited for about 30 minutes, try again, but he didn't budge. I'm losing my patience here folks. Please help me what to do. Besides, I'm a newbie here so this is how adobe welcomes new members who will simply try their products? they try to stop me from trying? How do I know if it works correctly?

  Please read https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1499014

  -try some steps such as changing browsers and disable your firewall

  -also clear the cache of your browser if you start with a fresh browser

  -check the file hosts for blocked entries https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1912777

  http://myleniumerrors.com/installation-and-licensing-problems/creative-cloud-error-codes-w ip.

  https://helpx.Adobe.com/creative-cloud/KB/creative-cloud-desktop-application-failed.html

  http://helpx.Adobe.com/creative-cloud/KB/failed-install-creative-cloud-desktop.html

• Why NOAA site "time" does not give is more good time?

  For several weeks, I have been unable to get the correct time on the website of NOAA to Ft Collins CO. This has been great for years of work and to my knowledge is the only affected site.
  At the opening session, get a black page showing attempts to connect to which he never does. When I try to disconnect says "firefox is committed" and I have to restart the browser. Anyone know what gives?

  Try updating Java to the latest version of Java 7, if this site uses a Java applet to display the time.

  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/using+the+Java+plugin+with+Firefox
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Java

  You can find the latest version of Java on Oracle's Web site.

  See the Platform Java > Java SE 7U45 (download JRE)

  • http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/Java/javase/downloads/index.html
  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/why-do-i-have-click-Activate-plugins

• Why the total time required for the test sequence is different during the test runs

  Hello

  -J' have different test resources to test our product which includes engines and the NOR-Box (6351).

  -Number of test files in sequence that are called during the test (ca. 20)

  -The problem is that when I run these test sequence files separate (say only 3 out of 20), total time by these tests are t1, t2 and t3, but when - I left all 20 tests to run without jumping all the time needed by the 3 tests above is t1 + 60 s, t2 + 80 s and t3 + 50sec. Why it is so and how can I avoid this problem.

  -The tests are motors to move, take samples or box then save them on my computer after testing the limits. Since they are time critical, when I do all the running tests in a test go a lot do not PASS. I can't run them separately because it takes more time, more interference by user and also more than one report that is not desired.

  -J' tried unloading after execution steps, but it did not help.

  Kind regards

  RB

  This probably depends on that made your sequence. Have you tried shrink where extra time is being spent? You can time how long different parts of your sequence are following the steps of the expression as follows:

  Locals.StartTime = Seconds()

  Locals.ElapsedTime = Seconds() - Locals.starttime

  You can also watch time module in your reports. There is nothing specific on TestStand that should cause some sort of slow down like this. I recommend trying to figure out where the extra time is being spent. I suspect once you do, the cause will become obvious.

  -Doug

• Why the execution time increases with a while loop, but not with "run continuously?

  Hi all

  I have a problem of severe weather that I don't know how to fix it because I don't know exactly where it comes from.

  I order two RF switches via a data acquisition card (NI USB-6008). One job at the same time can be selected on each switch. Basically, the VI created for this feature (by a colleague) resets all the outputs of acquisition data and active then those desired. It has three entrances, two chain simp0le controls and a cluster table, that contains the list of all the outputs and some practical information to know what is connected (specific to my application).

  I use this VI in a complex application, and I have some problems with the execution time, which increased whenever I said the VI, so I did a test VI (TimeTesting.vi) to determine where the problem came. In this special VI I record the execution time in a csv file to analyze then with excel.

  After several tries, I found that if I run this criterion VI with the while loop, execution on every cycle time increases, but if I remove the while loop and use the funtionnality "Continuous run", the execution time remains the same. In my high level application, I have while loops and events, and so the runtime increases too.

  I someone could explain to me why execution time increases and how can we avoid this? I have attached my VI test and the necessary subVIs, as well as an image of a graph that shows the execution time with a while loop and «run permanently»

  Thanks a lot for your help!

  Your SetReset_DO VI creates a channel whenever it is called.  And that you never delete a task.

  When running continuously, that it's as if it only runs once and LabVIEW has internal mechanisms to close references that will not be used again.  When a VI is used as a Subvi, LV does not know if she will be called again, and lacks these things until the first level VI stops. You have a memory leak.

  Just as you open and close your file outside the loop for, create your channel out of the loop.

  Lynn

• Captioning in Premiere Pro like medieval torture... why, at this time?

  So, here am I, a videographer from the opera (and the editor in Chief). My task: take the PowerPoint file that the company used as surtitles (above the stage) and make subtitles with it. Wow! First - I've used for the past eight years-allowed just creation of subtitles! Looks for a match in the sky! Well well... None. The editor is a) intuitive, b) no interactive and c) all just stupid in its design. I put my first legend - this is Act 3 LA BOHÈME the sweep of entry "Hey there, guards! Open the door! "After going through hoops (create track legend, add to the timeline, add text in a dialog box) I see little boxes that I created... I can move them? No. I have to add THE TIME CODE to the dialog box and how long it should be displayed by intuition, NOT BY EYE. If I'm a good boy, she will show where I have to say. I can drag handles (there are the handles but my torturer at the Adobe engineering service decided I can't use them) to change the width? No, in 2016, which is too ask. It works like something designed for Windows 2.2. The team working on this thing heard of WYSIWYG? The rest of this program is designed to be visually adjusted. THIS is not the case. I'm sick. Do I really out of this DVD and design caption/subtitle tracks in Encore CS6 which has a Publisher better than this piece of disgust?

  Now, imagine this scenario: I just make beautiful videos of 4K (more a Livestream of new year) eight performances. I'd use the same piece of legend and to refine the legends visually to adapt to fluctuations of tempo and different breaks that four different casts of the opera (4 sopranos play Mimi, 3 playing Musetta, 4 tenors singing Rodolfo, 3 baritones Marcello singing in different performances) to different shows (they are not robots and the timings are different in various shows). I am paralyzed by this horrible thing.

  The subtitles in Encore CS6 Editor is much better than that. WHO DESIGNED THIS THING AND WHY THEY STILL HAVE JOBS? It's disgusting. Please fix.

  ElJayBronx wrote:

  So, here am I, a videographer from the opera (and the editor in Chief).

  Nice to meet you ElJayBronx.  I am a programmer for hearing and creation. Before Adobe, I had recorded many operas while in school and my internship working on broadcasts of the Vienna Staatsoper.  So, I have an appreciation for what you do.  Are what company you satisfied to opera?

  My task: take the PowerPoint file that the company used as surtitles (above the stage) and make subtitles with it. Wow! First - I've used for the past eight years-allowed just creation of subtitles! Looks for a match in the sky!

  First took the opportunity to burned in subtitles for years via the titration module.  In a recent update of creative cloud, we have added the option burn-in captions to export.  I guess the latter is what you are referring.

  The editor is a) intuitive, b) no interactive and c) all just stupid in its design.

  If you speak on the Panel of legends that is used to modify or retarget the subtitles encoded, I want to give some information.  A few years ago I and others on the team were charged with creating a workflow for customers of broadcast on this day that someone could edit video in first Pro, without having closed captions (usually embedded in the video signal) fell on the ground.  There are different ways some NLE do that, but in our customer research, we found that many broadcasters also wanted to change pre-existing of captioning.  Usually, this should be a Retiming or maybe fixing a spelling error.  We never had the intention that there be a solution for people to manually enter many captions (or subtitles) from scratch.  However, we wanted to give some of the features that could make some minor changes.  Every year at the NAB Show, I was really surprised by the number of people who go into the voting booth and say, they created subtitles via this Panel from scratch.  My eyes open usually wide as does my jaw. I tell them something along the lines "wow, it must be painful', to which they respond with the assertion but also to point out that he avoids them having to buy dedicated (and expensive) captioning software.

  I put my first legend - this is Act 3 LA BOHÈME the sweep of entry "Hey there, guards! Open the door! "After going through hoops (create track legend, add to the timeline, add text in a dialog box) I see little boxes that I created... I can move them? No. I have to add THE TIME CODE to the dialog box and how long it should be displayed by intuition, NOT BY EYE. If I'm a good boy, she will show where I have to say. I can drag handles (there are the handles but my torturer at the Adobe engineering service decided I can't use them) to change the width? NO.

  Again, the intent of the closed captioning stream was for content that was already captioned.  I agree with you that it makes sense to have subtitles on the real movable clip markers, as clip markers are (hence the similar user interface).  However, I will point out that you can actually do this by editing the normal timeline.  You can actually razor the clip with the legends and make your move and cutting in this way. Once I show this to video editors, they usually pick up on it immediately and workaround is not so painful.  As a reminder, by slide and hack subtitle markers on a clip: a painful tease that's going nowhere slide and hack the captioning of the clips themselves, however, is as fluid as it is elsewhere in the timeline.

  The team working on this thing heard of WYSIWYG?

  Yes.

  The rest of this program is designed to be visually adjusted. THIS is not the case.

  We weren't able to do a WSIWYG implementation due to the complexity of the way in which the coded subtitles are encoded. It relies on technology from the beginning of the 1980s (late of the 1970s for Teletext for PAL) and has many limitations that makes things connecting to a harder visual interface.  Can it be done? Yes. Wouldn't be a lot of work? Without a doubt.

  Do I really out of this DVD and design caption/subtitle tracks in Encore CS6 which has a Publisher better than this piece of disgust?

  If your result is a DVD or Blu - Ray, which might be a better choice than the current workflow of captioning in first.  The callback functions are designed so that it looks like you are trying to reach.

  Now, imagine this scenario: I just make beautiful videos of 4K (more a Livestream of new year) eight performances. I'd use the same piece of legend and to refine the legends visually to adapt to fluctuations of tempo and different breaks that four different casts of the opera (4 sopranos play Mimi, 3 playing Musetta, 4 tenors singing Rodolfo, 3 baritones Marcello singing in different performances) to different shows (they are not robots and the timings are different in various shows). I am paralyzed by this horrible thing. The subtitles in Encore CS6 Editor is much better than that.

  Please try to chop the subtitle clips themselves as described above. You can resynchronize than elsewhere everything as if you were to sync up to an audio clip in the timeline panel.

  WHO DESIGNED THIS THING AND WHY THEY STILL HAVE JOBS?

  I did as well as some other team.  I always go to the office every day because the work is not done, and I am pleased to have an impact on the work done for our customers.

  It's disgusting. Please fix.

  Noted. I can't talk publicly about the plans for future work, but be aware that many of us on the team to read your message here as well as your email that went through the tech support escalation process.

  Charles

  P.S. I would like to see the work you do with the first. I'm not interested in criticizing it, but I would like to see it because the last measures of the 4th act in La Bohème still gives me chills.

• Why the airport Time Capsule for P/W after update to 7.7.7

  Time Capsule ask P/W when I click on it in the Airport utility to see whats connected to it, but never recognizes the P/W or back with the icon to forget.

  He returns to normal after a disconnect and a return to the restart card. This happens since the latest firmware update to 7.7.7.

  Once the Capsule is back to normal and you can access the settings in AirPort Utility, my suggestion would be to delete the current password on the Base Station and add a new password. It worked for me with the same question, and it might for you as well.

  Make sure you remember the password in the keychain in your Mac is checked, and then click Update at the bottom right of the window to save the new settings.

  

• Why the message time / date uses the original sent time?

  Hello
  I noticed that emails that are delayed come using the time sent initially, rather than when they reach my server. It is unusual, because it may end with a 'new' message finish well down the list of the other messages sent more recently.
  What's the intended operation?

  Note the following header: This shows up in my Inbox based on time 02:57 was created, even if he won't even let the original that much server later.

  The - Wed Mar 25 21:59:03 2014
  X key account: Account2
  X-UIDL: UID86003-1263191493
  X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
  X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
  X-Mozilla-keys:
  Return-path: < [email protected] >
  Envelope-to: [email address removed]
  Delivery date: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 15:11:16-0700
  Received: og1.ijnet.net ([216.246.89.40]: 47913)
  by napkin.mysitehosted.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82)
  (envelope - from < [email protected] >)
  ID 1WSZYx - 00074-n. b.
  [removed email address]; Tuesday, March 25, 2014 15:11:15-0700
  X-envelope-From: [email protected]
  X-envelope-To: [email address removed]
  Received: From hopkins.tea.state.tx.us (198.214.98.149) by og1.ijnet.net (MAILFOUNDRY) id VQwf2rRqEeOelwAw [removed email address]; Tuesday, March 25, 2014 22:10:59-0000 (GMT)
  Received: from ([198.214.97.182])
  by hopkins.tea.state.tx.us with ESMTP id 5503449.345156795;
  Tuesday, March 25, 2014 16:48:03-0500
  Received: Miller (miller.tea.state.tx.us [198.214.97.182])
  by miller.tea.state.tx.us (AIX5.2/8.11.6p2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id s2PLgCe45034;
  Tuesday, March 25, 2014 16:42:12-0500
  Received: by LIST. TETN.NET (LISTSERV-TCP/IP 14.5 release) with the id of coil 204073

           for [email address removed]; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:32:55 -0500
  

  Approved-By: [removed email address]
  Received: from hopkins.tea.state.tx.us (hopkins.tea.state.tx.us

           [198.214.98.149]) by miller.tea.state.tx.us (AIX5.2/8.11.6p2/8.11.0)
           with ESMTP id s2PJvne69120 for <[email address removed]>; Tue, 25 Mar 2014
           14:57:49 -0500
  

  Received: from ([198.214.97.51]) by hopkins.tea.state.tx.us with ESMTP id

           5503449.345151870; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:57:47 -0500
  

  Of workaround applies only to an IMAP account, where only the headers are downloaded. Quite rare really that is not the default.

  The date of receipt is available in the pane always, just right clicking on the headers and select it from the list is all that is needed. Sort by the order received however denies all dates and maintains strict order of the received mail. However, all these things are on the view > menu sort order, including consolidation of beloved today yesterday last week so the sort of Outlook users.

  Curiously, I find everything on Outlook without exchange awkward and somewhat limited, but it's an exchange client really not a customer of general e-mail in my opinion.

• Why is backup time machine so slow?

  I bought a new backup drive.  1 TB LaCie.

  I can copy files directly to him and it's pretty fast.

  When I try to make a backup using time machine, it took 2 hours for 5 GB of backup and still has not finished to calculate the time to complete the backup.

  Kind regards

  Greg

  Maybe this will help you:

  http://pondini.org/TM/troubleshooting.html

  Is this the first full backup or incremental backups?

  The first backup takes a long time.

• Why is my Time Machine backup to a standstill?

  MacBook Pro

  10.11.2

  I7 to 2.2 GHz

  16GB 1600 MHz DDR3

  Wipe the disc Time Machine and started from scratch.

  Trying to save the system itself and 1.25 to iTunes media since a Transcend 2 TB to 2 TB Seagate external hard drive: the external hard drive.

  It seems to back up the internal system OK but he's stuck at 4.99 GB when I include the external hard disk to the backup list.

  I am getting many errors of Spotlight in Console like below but not knowing in the text what they have to do with the iTunes backup media etc.?

  com Apple.corespotlight.log.index] caught error while you are talking to the agent of the index, index:, error: domain error = NSCocoaErrorDomain Code = 4099 "the connection to the service named com.apple.spotlight.IndexAgent was invalid." UserInfo = {NSDebugDescription = the connection to the service named com.apple.spotlight.IndexAgent has been invalidated.}

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  I tried many suggestions from other threads:

  • Rebuild the e-mail accounts
  • Delete all messages with attachments in case of corruption
  • Log off, and then back in iCloud
  • Re-index the internal drives and two external drives
  • Start in safe mode and then start normally again and try again
  • Connect to other user accounts (no point since guest users are disabled)

  All without success so far.

• Wasting time on windows server 2012 R2

  Hi I have a HP DL380 I installed WindowsServer 2012 R2. I put my time and time zone + 3. but every one hour time to 3 hours and again in an hour go 3 hours before. I changed the CMOS battery and tried to use the source of external time but still does the same thing. All the solutions to this?

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  *
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum

• Why my network time-out when you try to download the update for ipod?

  I keep trying to download Ipod software version 5.0.1 which takes about 2 hours, but after an hour or two, says network error message has expired. I checked all the settings that I found but nothing helped.

  Hello

  I removed the suggestion of Brian Tillman on the accounting in the Forum Feedback since I went ahead and moved this thread in a forum more appropriate responses.

  However, I still agree with his second suggestion to ask in the forums of Apple. As you mention that this problem occurs by updating your iPod, I think there must be a problem with her or with iTunes which is at the origin of the network to time out.

• laptop computer wasting time on the clock

  Compaq Presario CQ57 time loser on clock, whats wrong

  Hello

  The most common cause of this problem is the CMOS battery.

  Its a button battery on the motherboard that keeps the time even when the computer is turned off.