Why preview is rendered faster than the actual speed of my clips?

When I create a new project, the overview of my project "plays" faster than the speed of the video. As it is fast forward. Each of the speed of clips are 100%.

I tried to uninstall and reinstall the first but still have the same problem.

Any idea? Thank you

sample rate is 48 kHz

Some people set their entry to 'none', but I do not see as to how that is going to change anything

Tags: Premiere

Similar Questions

  • Why disable SuperFetch on ssd, if the RAM is much faster than the ssd?

    Directed by Microsoft that SuperFetch and PreFetch must be disabled, if the OS is installed on an ssd, in accordance with article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2727880. But SuperFetch is used for loading the data components of applications, which were very often used for RAM. Although the ssd is faster that a hard drive is not faster than the RAM. So, I do not understand why Microsoft suggest disabling this feature. The only reason why I want to understand, it's because of a limited RAM. If the RAM is sufficient beyond 6 GB, if we disable SuperFetch, then the boot time and increase the loading time of most used applications. I miss something here?

    The other question is about PreFetch. I feel, maybe wrong, it does the same thing with SuperFetch, with one major difference. It loads all the information data on the ssd or hard drive, instead of the RAM, in order to accelerate the launch of applications and time when the OS is installed on a hard drive to boot. If I'm right, let's disable the PreFetch it stores information for one ssd or hdd, while SuperFetch stores data of RAM information, which is much faster and so it must be enabled if there is a sufficient RAM.

    I look forward to reading the notice of a Microsoft software engineer.

    Hi Leventis,

    Prefetch copies frequently accessed files together into a contiguous on the disk area so that they can be located and loaded more quickly. That it takes a lot of old drives to recover data faster.

    SuperFetch predict what applications you run next and preload all the necessary data in the memory. She has also done that with startup files. And for all the three days he sends a defragmentation command to the OS drive that will cause problems in the SSD drives.

    In traditional hard drives (HDD) data are scattered throughout the disk, so that the operating system for access, it will take more time. It is suggested to perform a disk defragmentation. But storage technology is different in SSD, where, it records the data dynamically and it recovers more quickly. Who will be low down the burden on the RAM and the RAM can be used for uses such as for the opening of the games graphics high-end, etc..

    Hope this information is useful.

  • Clean install of Windows a lot faster than the preinstalled system?

    My satallite comes with windows 64-bit installed.
    Since a lot of people suggested, here and elsehwere, a clean installation making consierably faster than the pre-installed windows (all bloated and unwanted software uninstalled with the uninstall program).

    Although fresh installtion was faster without drivers and programs, it has become more or less the same after installation of all software, etc. (perhaps a difference of 2 to 4% in the use of RAM) (over 4 GB)

    Is this normal or do others go much faster on any new install, for me, this effort has proved there is not a lot of use to do a clean install to drive retail.

    Ideas, wiers and feed back?

    See you soon

    Many pre-installed utilities are required for correct functionality and it can be a headache get these functions to work after installing a street copy of Windows.

    You will find that when you install Antivirus software on a street copy of Windows, it will happen similar to the pre-installed Windows installation. So if you want that the installation of Windows pre-installed perform better, uninstall the Antivirus should do the trick.

  • Is faster than the HP Mini 110 Microsoft Surface?

    My HP Mini 110 series netbook is SLOW and it is 2 years old and the Microsoft Surface seems newer, but I want to know if the Microsoft Surface would go faster (for example, loading programs and files, etc.)

    The HP Mini 110 has an Intel Atom processor and the Microsoft Surface has an ARM processor.

    The Microsoft Surface would be faster than the HP Mini 110?

    It must be such that it is a newer CPU, but until the Surface is in the hands of consumers, we do not have really the real world benchmarks. I am 100% sure that whatever that is released by Microsoft or others would show much faster and better in all aspects. But these are marketing people making conversation, not technicians running the real numbers.

  • Is faster than the local AIR IOS app remote SWF SWF because I can ' t use the unloading code.

    Are faster than the local SWF on AIR IOS app remote SWF because I can't use the code to unload on IOS of AIR.

    my local code:

    Stop();

    import flash.net.URLRequest;

    import flash.system.ApplicationDomain;

    import flash.system.LoaderContext;

    import flash.filesystem.File;

    import flash.filesystem.FileMode;

    import flash.filesystem.FileStream

    go_level_2.addEventListener (MouseEvent.Click, Level_2);

    function level_2(event:MouseEvent) {}

    var loader2:Loader = new Loader();

    var loaderContext2:LoaderContext = new LoaderContext (false, ApplicationDomain.currentDomain);

    var file2:File = File.applicationDirectory.resolvePath ("level2.swf");

    loader2. Load (new URLRequest (file2.url), loaderContext2);

    addChild (loader2);

    }

    Because it works for me, because I can't unload the SWF app file en becomes slow, I'll put the SWf file "s on a remote location.

    But I can't imagine what is happening when I loaded the SWF file remotely. It remains on the server, or it remains on my application when I unloaded it, and the app gets also larger. I hope you can help me because I went on the internet for a week and do not now how to go further.

    I had a similar problem, but not on iOS.

    Maybe my solution might work for you too, however.

    The problem was this line:

    new LoaderContext (false, ApplicationDomain.currentDomain);

    Do not reuse the same field of application, or you will never be able to get rid definitions and thus the SWF loaded.

    Instead, make a new child application domain for the current domain, keep track of it and it has as well as the rest of the SWF file when you are finished.

    Example:

    var loader2:Loader = new Loader();

    var appDomain2:ApplicationDomain = new ApplicationDomain (ApplicationDomain.currentDomain);

    var loaderContext2:LoaderContext = new LoaderContext (false, appDomain2);

    var file2:File = File.applicationDirectory.resolvePath ("level2.swf");

    loader2. Load (new URLRequest (file2.url), loaderContext2);

    addChild (loader2);

    Then

    function finishLevel2(event:Event):void

    {

    var loader2:Loader;

    loader2 = Event.Target.Loader;
    loader2.parent.removeChild (loader2);

    loader2.unloadAndStop ();

    appDomain2 = null;

    }

    Note that the definitions of the classes of the loaded SWF file will be available in the new application domain.

  • List of links online HBA with the actual speed

    Hello

    I would like to list all the HBAS links and their actual speed on each host. I wrote this command:

    Get-VMHost | Get-VMHostHba | where {$_.} Status - eq 'online'}

    that works very well for the list of devices, but I miss two data:

    -name of the host (I guess this should be stated in the first part of Get-VMHost - but how?)

    -the actual speed of the link (on the host for example I see it with a simple "cat/proc/scsi/qla2xxx/7 |") grep speed")

    How do I see all of the available data for a single list and show only those that I need?

    I'm just starting to play with PowerCli... of sort any help welcome...

    VMHost and speed are the properties of the object that are not displayed by default. You can get all the properties with:

    Get-VMHost |
    Get-VMHostHba |
    where-Object {$_.Status -eq "online"} |
    Format-List *
    

    If you want only the properties Name, VMHost and speed, you can do:

    Get-VMHost |
    Get-VMHostHba |
    where-Object {$_.Status -eq "online"} |
    Select-Object -Property Name,VMHost,Speed
    

    For my hosts, the speed is always 0. I don't know why that is.

  • Why Chrome load websites faster than Firefox

    I can load a website at least two times faster than Firefox Chrome. Why?

    Hello

    The reset Firefox feature can solve a lot of problems in restaurant Firefox to its factory default condition while saving your vital information.
    Note: This will make you lose all the Extensions, open Web sites and preferences.

    To reset Firefox, perform the following steps:

    1. Go to Firefox > help > troubleshooting information.
    2. Click on the button 'Reset Firefox'.
    3. Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is finished, it will display a window with the imported information. Click Finish.
    4. Firefox opens with all the default settings applied.

    Information can be found in the article Firefox Refresh - reset the settings and Add-ons .

    This solve your problems? Please report to us!

    Thank you.

  • R7000 Nighthawk Wired is faster than the wireless

    I currently use a Nighthawk R7000 and after the speed test internet using speedtest.net, I found that a desktop computer that is connected directly with ethernet is more than 100 Mbps faster than a wireless laptop which is the only room away from the router (wired office gets 140 ~-~ 160 Mbit/s, while the laptop is ~ 30-40 ~ Mbps). Any help would be great.

    Thanks to all who tried to help, but he had a friend IT of my father who came and said: it's a certain chip (or something of the kind) in my computer that was wrong, so we got a Linksys adapter Max - Stream AC600 WiFi Micro USB. I can now get 90 Mbits/s download. Thanks again for everyone's help.

  • In addition to making video is the most powerful 60 d or faster than the 50 d.

    I have a 50 d is there one reason other than the ability to make the video to purchase a 60 d.

    Canon made a large step backward with the 60 d, I agree with other posters.

    The articulated screen is nice for video, but really not so valuable to the shooting yet. In fact, I consider the rebel T5i to be upper-middle to the 60 d and which is reflected in the price of these two bodies ($700 for a 60 d) and $850 for a T5i.  Don't 'upgrade' to the 60 d.  The next update of the 60 d is now the 7 d, which is a fine camera.

    Canon seems to work in three directions: creation less expensive cameras full frame (6 d vs 5DIII), the upgrade of the rebels as well as a transfer line which was the 40 d, 50 d to the 7 d product line.  I think the 60 d will be the last body "double-digit".  In fact, the EOS - M has the same internals as the T5i but in a small body.

    For everyone (except the 60 d

  • Now, the screen moves as the surface is larger than the actual size of the screen. I checked its display options, but how do I disable this screen oversized?

    Hello

    My mother was a member of the family to try to help inrease size but Bobo and now its screen in any program or simply from bottom of screen size is larger than the size of the screen.  She can move the mouse to the left to bring the extreme left veiw and then the same thing right but never have all the screen in veiw now.  How to restore to normal for her.  I tried control - display, but not... help her please help me

    Hi M Carmel,

    Thanks for posting in the Microsoft community.

    I understand that you are facing the issue with the resolution of the screen display.

    I suggest you to see the links and check.

    Change the resolution of your monitor

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-XP/help/Setup/change-monitor-resolution

    Change your screen resolution

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-XP/help/change-screen-resolution

    Please follow these recommended steps, review the additional information provided and after back if you still experience the issue. I will be happy to provide you with additional options available that you can use to get this resolved.

  • VM network transfer speeds are two times faster than the speed of the physical network

    My stats from the server:

    HP Proliant ML110 G6

    Intel Xeon X 3440 @ 2.53 GHz

    8 GB RAM

    1 Gigabit NIC onboard

    1 PCIx dual port Intel Gigabit NIC

    1 1 to Seagate HARD drive (for virtual machines and ISO storage)

    4 1 to HP 7200 RPM hard drives

    ESXi 5.5 U2

    Network:

    Belkin AC1200 F9K1113v4 Gigabit router

    Computer:

    Sony Vaio i5 2440 M, 8 GB, 5400 RPM HDD

    The main objective of the ESXi server should be used as a NAS, but with the additional ability to run Windows or Linux VM casual as a game server.  I currently have Open Media Vault controls 1 to 4 hard drives in a configuration RAID10 of software with a plugin SMB/CIFS to provide access to the shares through the windows.

    Network management is through the card on board.  OMV uses its own port on the Intel network card.

    The problem:

    Transfers of networks (upload) to my Windows 7 PC to NAS OMV are slow (average 40MBps).  Playback speed (downloads) of SIN is about 100 Mbps, which is decent.  I tested the disk write speed using the hdparm since the console command, and they are all on average 110 - 130 Mbps.  Why is my computer so slow transfer speeds?  Is there a setting to ESXi which limits my network connection?

    Some things I noticed:

    If only I start a computer Windows 7 virtual on ESXi VMNetwork, my transfers from the Windows 7 VM to the NAS VM on average 105 MB/s, while the playback speed is around 90MBps.  If I could get my physical network to transfer at these speeds, it would be satisfactory.

    Can someone help me?

    Hello

    I presume that the OMV is the culprit here. See for example this discussion: http://forums.openmediavault.org/index.php/Thread/5507-Extreme-slow-samba-speeds/

    You may be able to resolve the server Samba inside the OMV.

    cykVM

  • Smaller than the actual brush, PS CC 2015 (brush and eraser) cursor help!

    PC specs and hardware:

    Windows 8, Photoshop CC 2015, Creative Cloud 2015, Intuos 3 tablet, 1920 x 1080 display

    I've updated for Creative just a couple of hours there are clouds and have been satisfied with the frustrations without end.

    Most of the questions I resolved or can live with, but is not one of these.

    Untitled-2.png

    In my image, the circle at the bottom has a selection rectangle (which is supposed to be my brush cursor, but when I screen cap it disappears) indicating the size of the cursor, but the cleared area is significantly greater than the slider. I messed up round in 'Sliders' options, but none of those who have had no effect.Untitled-.png

    I'll try to be as helpful as possible as well as to answer the questions.

    (In addition, tips to make my windows not as big tool?) I have messed with the user interface in the menu options, but that is all fucked up too.)

    Size slider should show the range including any flag.

    Your screenshot is 1920 x 1080, but for some reason it looks like it has triggered the IU 200%.  Is it perhaps a little notebook?  Set it to 100% like below, and you will have more space, but obviously with more small fonts and icons

  • Why photoshop cc costs more than the plan of creative photography cloud?

    I see that cc Photoshop costs $10 per month more than the plan of the photograph, although the plan has some cc of photoshop.  Applications are different in the two plans?

    Hi Howard,.

    The main difference between them is because the plan of CC of Photoshop comes with 20 GB of online storage space and inclusion Behance ProSite.

    Another difference between Photoshop CC and plan of photography, you can follow the article: helps Photoshop | Differences between Photoshop and creative photography programs Cloud where the difference is clearly mentioned.

    Let us know for any more confusion around this.

    Thank you

    Yann Arora

  • What can I do if the script runs faster than the network?

    I wrote a script between applications moving to InDesign, where he begins to AppleScript, to Photoshop, which AppleScript runs a JavaScript script to perform various tasks.

    It works beautifully on my laptop at home where I do my development. Yesterday, using me as a Guinea pig, I tried it in the office.

    On the third round, I was horrified to see the ExtendScript Toolkit pop up with an error message (about as welcome to see an AppleScript script, asking the user to open the Script Editor and fix a script).

    The error message was that app.bringToFront (); was not a valid function.

    This was the case in InDesign, which has a different activation function, and I realized that, even if my AppleScript called Photoshop activate, I was still in InDesign.

    The app.bringToFront JavaScript was so called because I had joined my code in the model of Tranberry.

    So I pressed the button stop on ExtendScript, returned to InDesign and represented the script. This time he worked as usual.

    Occasionally on our network we spend some time beachball - watch as a communication happens in the background. So I guess the time wherever the error was thrown was on one of these downturns in the network.

    The passage of InDesign, Photoshop is not happening pretty fast, but the script has run and has issued an order Photoshop JavaScript while I was still in InDesign.

    In AppleScript this unhappy communication with users can be avoided using blocks '... try error'.

    Is there an equivalent of the error handling in JavaScript that would allow me to avoid being tossed in the ExtendScript Toolkit and give them a friendly message to apologize, explaining what had happened and inviting them to try again?

    JavaScript has try/catch blocks

    try {}

    app.bringToFront ();

    } catch (e) {}

    error handling code

    }

    Or you might be able to use an if statement

    If (app == 'photoshop') {}

    app.bringToFront ();

    } else {}

    app handle not photoshop

    }

  • Why windows folder shows size much larger than the actual content

    When I check my Windows folder properties, it shows the size of the folder as 16 GB. But when I open that folder and select all the files (including the hiden files) and then check the properties it shows the total size is 6 GB. Why is there a difference of 10 GB when I check the size of the same folder from these two different places.

    Ashish519,
    Thank you for visiting the Microsoft Answers community forum.

    When you examine the properties of a file, it shows the size of everything in this file, including other folders and files in these folders and folders within folders and files in these folders. etc.  When you open a folder and use "Select all" then select properties and it, it goes only to show the size of all the files in this folder, no subfolders or files in subfolders.

    I hope that answers your question.
    Thank you

    Gloria
    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

Maybe you are looking for