WLC-4402-50 load balancing

Similar Questions

• To balance the load or not load balance? ISE and F5 Big IP

  My team is currently negotiating to put our two devices of ISE (nodes PSN) behind our F5 load balancing deployment.

  Our network is relatively small (5K users) with a small deployment wireless (Cisco 4 controllers with 300 access points). Growth of the network should remain relatively small in the years to come.

  We will deploy Dot1X wired, followed by reclamation and the assessment of posture. (BYOD isn't an option).

  On the one hand, the characteristics of Big IP could make it easier for us to perform load balancing, maintenance and troubleshooting.

  On the other hand, the Big IP adds another layer of complexity in an already complex deployment. We already have the ability to balance the load of the switches themselves. Load balancing for the wireless should not be a problem that our deployment is very small and I expect to stay that way. Given the size of my environment, it seems to be relatively little to gain for the additional efforts and the potential pitfalls.

  Someone at - it care to share their honest opinion on this issue?

  Thank you

  Phill

  Load balancers are elegant and do their job well when it comes to distribute the load between servers. You already have a then I would use it if you have technical skills to set it up.

  That being said, if your team is not 100% comfortable with F5 then you should certainly jump. Instead, you can configure your WLCs to use as a primary and secondary Radius Server node #2 node #1 , then your switches use Node #2 as primary and secondary node #1 .

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• problem with the guest in WLC 4402 account

  I created a single guest in WLC 4402 version 4.2 account and distribute to every visitor that comes in our society. However, when we receive a lot of visitors, the WLC end authenticate. Anyone know if there is a limit using a guest account?

  Properly refuse authentication? Or the page of connection stop appearing or something?

  There was a bug with the webauth die under a heavy load, regardless of the number of accounts used the same.

  A good way for you to check, if problem, would be to create a second user backup comments and see if that has started to work. If not, the account is not the problem.

  I'm not aware of any use of the same account maximum.

  4.2 what exactly are you running?

• Cisco AIR-LAP1041N-E-K9 does not not with WLC 4402 version 7.0.116.0

  Hi all

  appreciate your support for a problem I started to deal with today. I have a Cisco WLC 4402 running the 7.0.116.0 version and it's great to work with 25 Cisco 1252 access points. We received a new 20 Cisco 1041N APs today and I installed one in our site, but it does not work. He well worked and loaded the flash image and obtained WLC ip through DHCP option address and began to show the below error:

  * 00:00:10.021 Mar 1: % SOAP_FIPS-2-SELF_TEST_IOS_SUCCESS: crypto IOS FIPS self-test passed

  * 00:00:10.033 Mar 1: * CRASH_LOG = YES

  * 00:00:10.333 Mar 1: 1 Port is not presentSecurity base.

  MAC Ethernet address of base: C8:9 C: 1 D: 53:57:5E

  * 00:00:11.373 Mar 1: % SOAP_FIPS-2-SELF_TEST_RAD_SUCCESS: crypto RADIO FIPS self-test passed on Dot11Radio interface 0

  * 00:00:11.465 Mar 1: % LWAPP-3-CLIENTEVENTLOG: reading and initialized AP event log (contains, 1088 messages)

  * 00:00:11.494 Mar 1: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 00:00:12.526 Mar 1: % LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0, changed State to

  * 00:00:13.594 Mar 1: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0, changed State to

  * 00:00:13.647 Mar 1: % SYS-5-RESTART: System restarted.

  Cisco IOS software, software C1040 (C1140-K9W8-M), Version 12.4 (23 c) JA2, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc3)

  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport

  Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.

  Updated Thursday, April 13, 11 12:50 by prod_rel_team

  * 00:00:13.647 Mar 1: % SNMP-5-start COLD: SNMP agent on host APc89c.1d53.575e knows a cold start

  * 00:08:59.062 Mar 1: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 1 Mar 00:08:59.062: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 00:08:59.138 Mar 1: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to reset

  * 00:08:59.837 Mar 1: % SSH-5-ACTIVATED: SSH 2.0 has been activated

  * 00:09:00.145 Mar 1: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on the Interface Dot11Radio0, state change downstairs

  * 00:09:09.136 Mar 1: % ADDRESS_ASSIGN-6-DHCP: Interface GigabitEthernet0 assigned address DHCP 172.16.26.81, mask 255.255.255.0, hostname APc89c.1d53.575e

  * 00:09:17.912 Mar 1: % PARSER-4-BADCFG: unexpected end of the configuration file.

  * 00:09:17.912 Mar 1: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 00:09:17.984 Mar 1: message logging LWAPP to 255.255.255.255.

  * 00:09:19.865 Mar 1: % CDP_PD-4-POWER_OK: full power - supply NEGOTIATED online

  * 00:09:19.886 Mar 1: % LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to

  * 00:09:20.873 Mar 1: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to

  * 00:09:20.874 Mar 1: % SYS-6-LOGGINGHOST_STARTSTOP: logging to host started 255.255.255.255 - initiated CLI

  Translate "CISCO-CAPWAP - CONTROLLER.atheertele.com"... the domain server (172.16.40.240)

  * 00:09:29.029 Mar 1: % CAPWAP-5-DHCP_OPTION_43: the 172.16.100.102 drive address obtained by DHCP

  * 08:27:02.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:02.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:03.175 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:03.177 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:03.177 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:03.329 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:03.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:03.333: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:03.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:03.378 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:03.378 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:03.378: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 25 May 08:27:03.448: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 08:27:14.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:14.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:15.185 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:15.186 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:15.186 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:15.330 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:15.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:15.334: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:15.334 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:15.379 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:15.379 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:15.379: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 25 May 08:27:15.450: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 08:27:26.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:26.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:27.182 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:27.183 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:27.184 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:27.329 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:27.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:27.333: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:27.333 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:27.377 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:27.377 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:27.377: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 08:27:27.433 may 25: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state down administratively

  * 08:27:27.446 may 25: % PARSER-4-BADCFG: unexpected end of the configuration file.

  * 25 May 08:27:27.447: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 08:27:27.448 may 25: % LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to

  * 08:27:27.456 may 25: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to reset

  * 08:27:38.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:38.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:39.183 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:39.184 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:39.184 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:39.326 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:39.329 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:39.329: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:39.330 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:39.375 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:39.375 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:39.375: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 25 May 08:27:39.446: State of the voice_diag_test of WLC is false

  * 08:27:49.000 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:49.001 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to

  * 08:27:50.179 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created successfully peer_ip: 172.16.100.101 peer_port: 5246

  * 08:27:50.180 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: send request to join 172.16.100.101

  * 08:27:50.180 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed State to ADHERE

  * 08:27:50.323 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state CFG

  * 08:27:50.326 may 25: % DTLS-5-ALERT: WARNING received: close notify alert from 172.16.100.101

  * 25 May 08:27:50.326: % PEER_DISCONNECT-5-DTLS: Peer 172.16.100.101 has closed the connection.

  * 08:27:50.326 may 25: % DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: send FATAL: close notify alert at 172.16.100.101:5246

  * 08:27:50.370 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 08:27:50.370 may 25: % CAPWAP-5-CHANGED: CAPWAP changed state of DISCOVERY

  * 25 May 08:27:50.370: bsnInitRcbSlot: slot 1 has NO radio

  * 08:27:50.425 may 25: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state down administratively

  * 08:27:50.438 may 25: % PARSER-4-BADCFG: unexpected end of the configuration file.

  I searched the difference in regulatory areas between AIR-LAP1041N -E- K9 and AIR-LAP1041N -A- K9 and no difference was found which may affect the operation of this access point.
  to cite our WLC configuration for regulatory areas is:
  Country set AR codes

   

  Area of regulation 802. 11A:-A

  802.11bg:-a

  My question is should I just include my country in the WLC (IQ) add the field of requlatry (-E) to solve this problem? or change the country will affect the operation of all APs workers?

  Appreciate your kind support,

  Patrick Q.

  Try adding a European country to your regulatory domain.

• Correct settings to use Smart Connect and load balancing?

  Hi guys

  I have a question, the answer of which I was not able to find explicitly, so I hope a quick fix OK / not OK for you:

  I would use tri-band technology provides the R8000, i.e. to activate Smart Connect / load balancing. Is - it only works Ghzs 5 band, or the router can also connect clients on the 2 Ghz bands?

  If this is true, then I need to give the strip of 2, 4 GHz the SSID the same 5 Ghz band, correct?

  Otherwise, if it only works in the 5 Ghz bands, I could keep the SSID distinguishes?

  Thank you

  Balancing of resources between the two radios. 2, 4 GHz band vs a single radio, the two radio channels in the 5 GHz band.

• Network Load Balancing error

  Hello

  I have DC with 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0 P.DNS 192.168.10.2 & ADC 192.168.10.3 P.DNS 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0

  When I configure the network load balancing in win2012r2 std I get below error. Please help on this.

  "NLB Manager running on a system with all networks bound to NLB mifht does not work as expected.
  If all interfaces are ser to run NLB in "unicast" mode, Manager NLB will fail to connect to the hosts. »

  Thank you.

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  *
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum

• What load balancing algorithm using the LRT224?

  I was wondering if anyone knew what algorithm of load balancing the LRT224 use since I can't find it anywhere and the telephone support line does not.  It is very similar to the RV320 of Cisco that uses Weighted Round Robin, but I don't think that the Linksys uses this algorithm because it includes speeds of bandwidth unlike the cisco that does not work.  and if anyone can also check that this unit doesn't package base rather than load balanced session load balancing.  as much information as possible would be appreciated!

  The standard of the LRT load balancing is alternated:

  Example:

  1 TCP connection to website-online WAN1

  2 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN2

  3 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN1

  4 TCP connection to website1.com-online WAN2

  If you enable the feature (recommended) sticky load balancing load balancing is done on a base per session instead of the base of the connection.

  Example:

  1 TCP connection to website-online WAN1

  2 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN2

  3 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN2

  4 TCP connection to website1.com-online WAN1

• SRW2008 load balancing

  Hi, what is the best way to balance the two connectrions with SRW2008 internet? Is possible to also "switch"?

  Thank you in advace

  Nino

  Aggregation of links (sometimes called "Bundling") combines two or more physical ports into a single logical port. After that, you have only one logical port. This allows you to increase the bandwidth on a link. To use it, you must connect the ports combined in another switch/device that supports the same and has the same configuration.

  So, Yes to use the aggregation of links, you'll need another switch like the SRW2008.

  However, the aggregation of links isn't load balancing. The logical port is still a single connection, even if it's running on multiple threads. It must connect to the same physical device.

• RV042 load balancing

  If I set up the router to load balance between my cable connection and DSL connection I see no advantage if I only have one computer connected to the router?

  Thank you

  David

  I think that you will not see much of a difference if you only use one computer.

• Maxum interfaces for the load balancing wan

  Hi all

  You know the interfaces maximum wan that I can use for load balancing?

  Hi Iimran,

  Lets say your sonicwall has N interfaces. You can use the interfaces wan (N-1) for load balancing

  Kind regards

  Barath R

  #IWork4Dell

• How to configure das MD3200i load balancing

  I would like to connect a MD3200i (with two raid controllers) to one of our Windows 2003 R2 servers without the aid of a switch.

  After most of the documentation, some things remain pretty obscure to me. I'm new to MPIO/balancing and cannot figure how to set up.

  Is it possible to connect 1 nic host to RAID 0 and another host nic to RAID 1 and then combine the bandwidth? Thus having 2Gbs instead of 1Gbs? Or is it only a redundant path sollution, happening the other controller in case of failure of the first line. How can I configure this regarding the IP addresses, subnets. And where is the configuered to load balancing. This is explained in the documentation? I can't find it. I found a few examples that include the use of a switch, but none with das sollutions.

  What I have is 4 the MD3200i UTP cables to connect to the host. 2 the high raid controller and 2 on the lower raid controller. And use that I have 4x1Gbs, resulting a connection 4Gbs to a single partition on the MD3200i of load balancing.

  Thanks for any help.

  Multiple paths and in windows 2003 load balancing is managed by the driver MPIO is installed when you install the 'host' or 'full' version install MD Storage Manager. There is no need to separately aggregated network adapters to get the aggregate bandwidth. The pilot, by default, uses repetition alternated on all ports connected to a single controller.

  Also, for a single virtual disk, all i/o through a single controller and the second controller acts as a redundant path. So, if you have 2 x 1 Gbps connections to each controller, you will have, at most, 2 Gbps for each partition. Now, each controller can have virtual disks, so the second controller may have a second partition that will also have a separate between 2 x 1 Gbps connection.

  You can set IP addresses and subnets that are similar to the way that you would with a switch as long as you can test the connection port. It would be wise for each NETWORK card on the host on a different subnet and each port on the MD3200i on the corresponding subnet. This will make it easier when you set up your iSCSI.

  You can use the configuration utility to MD in place your iSCSI sessions too

  -Mohan

• The storage load balancing process

  We have a group of 4 members, total approximately 30 TB of space. In the past, we had a lot of volumes of 500 GB for ESX, after the installation of the ESXi5.1, we use higher volumes, about 1.5 TB. So there are a lot of changes in the storage pool. We find that the EQ is balancing of storage compared to 4 members as expected. We thought it was over two or three days agoo, but now he's balancing... then again for a couple of day all volumes are spread over 3 members, also, as expected, but he decides to charge storage it swings again... and again...  It is coming to an end sometimes?

  We have another group with 4 members and also the same amount of space, but it we do not use the 1.5 TB volumes again... here, we see that EQ is continuous storage load balancing pool.

  Im not worried yet :)), but whenever volumes are redestributing compared to members, it does not follow on some reconnects for ESX as the part of a volume can and will reside on another Member where on that time esx is not a connection to that session at that time.

  Hello René,.

  It will not be stuck in a loop.  Part of the balance to the maintenance of free space between the members.  So when several pages are written to a specific member, space balancing will create plans to move the blocks to the other members to free up space on this member.  It's an ongoing balancing act.  In addition, extended periods of heavy i/o load balancer Advanced Performance will swap pages in order to compensate for the latency between members.

  Kind regards

• Load balancing question

  Hi all

  I have a question on the load balancing between several hosts of session.

  We have 6 Guest session, I created a managed with a specifik balancing application rule "Session desktop host advanced remotely. last Friday, he started a few problems, but we have not made any changes.

  the fist session host server had 71 active users and other servers were only 30.

  How is that possible?

  Do I have to put the rule on each server load balancing?

  Hello Sander,

  You must apply the rule individually for each RDSH of load balancing. Not on the managed desktop application. In our configuration, this does not work then maybe of the same counts for you.

  concerning

  Sijtze

• WLC 4402 impossible to authenticate correctly with ACS 5.2

  For some reason, I can't WLC to authenticate correctly with ACS 5.2. It's very strange in the sense that when I checked the log. ACS authenticates and authorizes the WLC 4402, but I can't log on the WLC. login screen appears, if I typed the username that he jumped

  Controller of >

  user:

  password:

  No matter what I typed (internal or external users), nothing seems to work.

  It comes to my frustration, I have no problem with authentication of routers and switches except WLC 4402.

  Hello

  Please delete privilege on the ACS level settings.

  Elements of strategy > authorization and permissions > peripheral Administration > Shell profiles > common tasks

  By default the privilege - do not use.

  Maximum privilege - not in use

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Anisha

  P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel that your query is resolved. Note the useful messages

• Limitation of the load balancing VPN3000

  Dear all,

  How many devices can be configured for balancing the load of solutions?

  What is the upper limit?

  Can I assume that if configure US 2 devices, the throughput will be be200 MB, flow of four aircraft is 400 MB, etc.?

  Any thoughts?

  Best regards

  Engel

  No, no, the traffic is not load balanced between all hubs in the group, that the connections are. For example, when you connect with a VPN client address bundle, concentrators determine what hub is lightly loaded, your connection is then completed and supplemented by this hub. All traffic goes between your client and the hub only, like any normal connection. There is no increase in bandwidth to this connection.

  In regard to the number of devices you use, we have tested successfully with 8, but there is no theoretical limit.