WRT150N access restrictions does not

Similar Questions

• ACS network access Restriction does not. He denies it, but allow.

  I have a problem with the restrictions of access to the network on the Group of ACS configuration.

  I configured the NAR in a group field and set it to deny access besed on client AAA, a wireless LAN controller.

  But users of this group is still able to connect wireless controller.

  Newspapers in GBA shows that the fields are right. the right user in the right of the group in good AAA client, but does not deny.

  Put in place DNIS also supports the restriction. This is how it should be configured,

  -Procedure for the configuration of NAR:

  (1) go to User Configuration---> select the user name that you want to restrict.

  2) go into Restrictions on access network (OAN) option.

  (3) by user defined network access Restrictions.

  (4) check "define CLI/DNIS-based access restrictions.

  (5) select "reject the call or Access Point.

  (6) in the dropdown AAA client list - select the name of the device on which the user does not connect.

  (7) for Port - Development *.

  (8) in CLI - use *.

  (9) for DNIS - development *.

  (10) click on submit

  Kind regards

  ~ JG

  Note the useful messages

• Restrictions does not not after ISO put 10.0.1 update with the new iPhone 7

  Restrictions does not after ISO put 10.0.1 update with the new iPhone 7 any which option of ranking app I don't choose no changes are made.  All the patches?

  Thank you

  Hello Launcher,

  Thank you for bringing your question about Restrictions here in Apple Support communities. My understanding of your question is that you change the Restrictions, but no change is noticed. I tried the same on my iPhone 6 Plus running iOS 10 and noticed a similar situation. Please allow me the opportunity to explain how the Restrictions is designed to work. First, I put my limitations for applications, do not allow Apps and together 4 +, which basically means everything beyond 4 + will be blocked from buying. Then I went to the App Store and the first app that caught my attention was NCIS: hidden crimes. This app is rated 12 + and is definitely an application I would not want my toddler to help. It is that Restrictions come into play. When I type on NCIS: hidden Crimes, the Get option is grayed out. Restrictions does remove all apps, songs, books, etc. from view, but it will prevent the purchase, download, and install all applications rated above the setting you choose when you set up restrictions. It's the help article that discusses the Restrictions and prevent purchases: Use Restrictions in order to avoid buying on iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch.

  I checked on the restrictions help articles, and I understand where it can be a bit confusing. In the help article Use Restrictions on iPhone, iPad and iPod touch, it says "You can use Restrictions, also known as parental control, to block or limit specific applications and features on your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch." This means in fact that apps, features or services (rated above that helped you, or if you have turned off completely) can he no longer appears on the device if the restriction is activated and starts blocking them. I also tested this by activating Restrictions and turned the cursor for Safari to off. When I went back to the home screen, Safari doesn't show any more and I could no longer use it.

  I hope this helps to clarify how the Restrictions. If my understanding of the issue was not accurate to the issue that you are experiencing, I will be happy to pursue this issue with you. Please indicate exactly what you took measures, and what expectations you had or the some restrictions, applications, features, or services you are restricted. Thanks again and have a great rest of your day!

• Portege R500 - TrueSuite Access manager does not work with IE 8

  TrueSuite Access Manager does not work with Internet Explorer 8

  Version:
  Internet Explorer: 8.0.6001.18702
  TrueSuite Access Manager 2.1.23.0

  Any idea?

  Thankx
  Robert

  Hello!

  Which laptop computer and operating system you have?
  And what do you mean with it doesn t work? You get an error message or something else?

  You must give us a little more information. Otherwise, we can t help you my friend.

  Good bye

• VeriSoft Access Manager does not work on Windows 7.

  VeriSoft Access Manager does not work on Windows 7. It worked on Windows Vista and 7 RC, but it now gives the error "this program blocked to compatibility problems. VeriSoft Access Manager is not compatible with this version of Windows. For more information, contact Cognizance Corporation. "He said that the problem file is AsGHost.exe. Any ideas how to solve this considereing that has worked in Windows 7 Release Candidate?

  This software is not yet compatible with Windows 7. I met the same problem. You must use different software to fingerprints. DigitalPersona works very well and can be downloaded from the HP website. Here is the link...

  http://h10025.www1.HP.com/ewfrf/wc/genericSoftwareDownloadIndex?LC=en&DLC=en&cc=us&softwareitem=ob-56930-1

• Restrictions does not not propely in Microsoft family safety

  Original title: Microsoft family safety

  I would like to know if anyone else has problems with their security settings for the family microsoft for minors does not not accordingly.  He worked for a few months, then the sections of restriction has been changed.  You used to be able to assign access during specific hours and block the other hours, but now its only giving the ability to allow access from any given time.  This does not work either.  All parameters have been set, but the account is able to log on during all hours of the day and the time spent on the computer is not being connected either!  I need help please.  The only other option at this point which is proof of the failure is to completely deny access completely, but I don't think that's fair.  Someone, anyone, please give me some advice.

  Hi Christine,

  Thanks for posting the request in the Microsoft Community.

  Family Safety: frequently asked Questions

  https://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/wiki/windows_other-security/family-safety-frequently-asked-questions/5672f7b2-e3c0-498a-9a6c-c9cab39f68e5

  Note: Follow the steps under the heading general troubleshooting.

  In addition, click on the link mentioned below as reference.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/family-safety-FAQ

  Back to us for any issues related to Windows in the future. We will be happy to help you.

• Citrix Access Gateway does not connect after update June 17

  I am running Citrix Access Gateway on a Windows 7 64-bit Client computer and as updates on 17 June, it does not connect.

  Have you checked with Citrix technical support? This would be my first step. If they cannot help, contact the technical support of MS for Windows Update.

  Support for Windows Update -http://support.microsoft.com/gp/wusupport

  Visit the Microsoft Solution Center and antivirus security for resources and tools to keep your PC safe and healthy.  If you have problems with the installation of the update itself, visit the Microsoft Update Support for resources and tools to keep your PC updated with the latest updates.

  If you are not in the Canada or the United States, there are numbers to contact local support here:http://support.microsoft.com/common/international.aspx
  MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Site WRT160N access restrictions will not work for https sites

  I configured a Web site blocking blocks http:// political access successfullywww.facebook.com on a WRT160N V1 v1.02.2.  I did it by entering www.facebook.com as URL #1 and "facebook" as a keyword and it works very well.  However, I have found that this policy does not prevent https:\\www.facebook.com.  Looks like the keyword would be able to block it but it does not work.  Help, please.

  It is not possible to block HTTPS web sites because the URLs are transmitted encrypted and therefore are not readable by the router...

• Access list does not work

  unbenannt.PNG

  

  I want that no package would leave f0/0 (R2).

  Here is my configuration:

  R1:

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  R2:

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  IP 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0

  IP access-group 101 out

  !

  access-list 101 deny ip any one

  !

  Given the configs shown in the original post R2 will be able to ping to R1 and I guess this (or something very similar) is what brings the original poster said that the ACL does not work.

  The problem here is that a list of access applied on an interface will not process the traffic generated by the router itself. The illustrious ACL will be very effective in preventing transit traffic (traffic that came from somewhere to R2 and must be DISPATCHED f0/0). But it will not work on the packages generated by R2.

  HTH

  Rick

• Harvest access policy does not

  Hello

  I'm accommodating a target system LDAP connected to IOM 11 GR 2 PS2 and I would like to use the political feature of harvest. I reconciled an account and it's target (rights) system roles in IOM and I waited this work to "Evaluate the user policies" would be given a role of IOM corresponding to the user (based on the system of law and the target defined in the access policy). But it doesn't work--not even after setting manual USER_PROVISIONING_ATTRS explicit. POLICY_EVAL_NEEDED = 1 (in the comic book) - after the work performed to the value of POLICY_EVAL_NEEDED is 0, but there is no association between the user account and the corresponding IOM role (I expect that this is the result of the harvest of the access policy).

  My setup - I set the cfg attributes XL system. AllowAPHarvesting, XL. AllowAPBasedMultipleAccountProvisioning to access TRUE, corresponding policy must be harvested system target filled in and also the corresponding payment is defined in the policy. Retro indicator is on. I did not set the discriminator to account for the target system because there is max one account per user in the target system LDAP.

  Can you help me identify the reason why the harvest is not working?

  Peter

  Hello

  Evaluate user policies does not associate a role of IOM with the user.

  The following post associate old user role:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E40329_01/admin.1112/e27149/Scheduler.htm#OMADM738

  Refresh the role memberships

  It assesses the role memberships and assigns users to roles based on rules. This work evaluates all the roles which the composition rules have changed since the last work performed and their immediate assessment have not been chosen by the administrator.

  None

  Yes

  ~ J

• Vmware server Web Access 2 does not work

  Dear vmware community:

  First of all thank you for taking the time to read this.

  I have a problem that looks like this isn't the first time that this happens, Yes, I was still unable to find an adequate solution.

  We have vmware server 2 is installed on a Debian 5 machine. Until yesterday, it was working fine.

  Today, when I tried to access to via web browser as usual, the page not load (the browser would say 'done, but the name of the page says "Loading").

  We have one of the virtual machines that are configured to start automatically, and it does not work as expected. The other I can't handle because I can't have the vmrun run perhaps (related?). So far, the only things that doesn't seem to work is web access only.

  There is one thing to note: after a restart of the computer, or restart the vmware mgmt, the service called "VMware Virtual Infrastructure Web Access" would show anything (while other services say "done" at the end of each line).

  I saw other people with similar problems here, and generally the solution was to reinstall the vmware server all on this machine. I would avoid this of course.

  Did someone already experienced this? Where I can look for more information on the VMware VI Web Access service won't start not (I do not know where are stored the logs of this service, maybe that can help).

  Please let me know if I should add any information, such as newspapers, etc.

  Thank you in advance!

  Hello

  I would recommend you check carefully this post and this post another may also help.

  Have you checked the vmrun documentation? Take a look at the file that I downloaded on this post.

  I would like to know if one of my tips work for you (or not)

  Best wishes / Saludos.

  Pablo

  Please consider providing any useful answer. Thank you!! - Por favor considered premiar las useful responses. ¡¡MUCHAS gracias!

  Virtually noob blog

• Access policy does not change the status of resource

  I have a set access policy to assign a role and a resource to anyone in a specific group. The policy work very well for those who have never had the resource before. For people who were in a disabled state resource - access policy is to add the role, but it does not change the State of the resource from disabled to enabled (or put into service).
  
  How can I do so it adds not only the role, but he changes the State of the handicapped resource? Thanks in advance.

  Simple!

  -Create an adapter of the entity during the prior insertion of the Members Group.Group of the user who will be called on the user being part of the group. Add custom java code that will check the resource assigned to this user and confirm if its there and in a disabled state. If its disabled and then turn it back on, otherwise just hang on and do nothing.

  Thank you

  Sunny

• access key does not work

  When I press the firefox on my keyboard shortcut key, that it does not start. It just display the file firefox with all its extrentions.

  I could show you, but this does not allow to send me a screen shot is

  It's the Firefox installation folder. Take a look at the parameters in the software keyboard to this button, if you add the 'path' for this button by adding \firefox.exe to the end that you should be able to get Firefox to launch.

  Sorry, I use base P/S-2 keyboards (IBM M-series buckling spring "clicky" now made by Unisys) that work without operating system who need to load the USB drivers or other software just to be able to use a simple device such as a keyboard or a mouse. The basic P/S-2 devices operate in a command or DOS window, or when the operating system does not start or is not yet installed; a habit I developed in the days before the BIOS 1 MB saw the day and contained chips based USB drivers.

• Ipv6 access list does not apply autonomous Aironet 3602I-E

  As you can see in the attached config I configured two SSID (2G & 5 G) for a third (2G only) SSID and PEAP WPA2-Ent on the vlan 2 for 'poor team access as guest '.

  Basically I forced the Dot11Radio0.2 interface in the Group of deck 1 to get all three SSIDS on vlan 1 (since I want just a quick way and dirty to allow its customers access to the internet, without having to configure a vlan separate everywhere).

  The guest SSID (XX COMMENTS) allows tkip in addition to BSE and uses a PSK rather than PEAP. Access lists configured on Dot11Radio0.2 IPv4 allows clients connected to this SSID get an IP by DHCP, use the DNS servers on the local network and access the internet. All other traffic for the local network is blocked by access lists guest_ingress and guest_egress.

  This all works very well, ipv4 is blocked for guests invited as expected. However, ipv6 is something different. For some reason, the ipv6 access list is completely ignored.

  Because I don't need ipv6 for guest access, I thought that I have completely block and do with it. As you can see I have this set:

  interface Dot11Radio0.2
  guest_ingress6 filter IPv6 traffic in
  guest_egress6 filter IPv6 traffic on

  and these ipv6 access lists have a rule of "refuse a whole" only. Yet, the XX COMMENTS SSID connected client gets an ipv6 address of the server on the LAN DHCP6 and has full connectivity. For ipv4, that I had to explicitly allow DHCP packets to the client not even get an IP, so the ipv6 access lists are not clearly applied.

  No matter if I move the access interface Dot11Radio0 instead lists, they don't do anything. I thought that maybe I should add a "enable ipv6" on the Dot11Radio0.2 interface (even if ipv6 traffic was very good, even where it shouldn't), but when I set "enable ipv6" Dot11Radio0 or Dot11Radio0.2 the radio goes into a sort of infinite loop of reset:

  000261: Sep 23 2016 22:32:50.512 it IS: % DOT11-5-EXPECTED_RADIO_RESET: restart Radio Dot11Radio0 interface due to the reset of the interface
  000262: Sep 23 2016 22:32:50.516 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to down
  000263: Sep 23 2016 22:32:50.524 it IS: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to reset
  000264: Sep 23 2016 22:32:51.516 it IS: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on the Interface Dot11Radio0, state change downstairs
  000265: Sep 23 2016 22:32:51.560 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to
  000266: Sep 23 2016 22:32:51.568 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to down
  000267: Sep 23 2016 22:32:51.576 it IS: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to reset
  000268: Sep 23 2016 22:32:52.608 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to
  000269: Sep 23 2016 22:32:53.608 it IS: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to
  000270: 22:32:53.608 Sep 23, 2016 it IS: % DOT11-5-EXPECTED_RADIO_RESET: restart Radio Dot11Radio0 interface due to the reset of the interface
  000271: Sep 23 2016 22:32:53.612 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to down
  etc.

  In addition, when creating a list like this ipv6 access:

  guest_egress6 IPv6 access list
  refuse an entire ipv6

  The other is automatically created:

  IPv6-guest_egress6 role-based access list
  refuse an entire ipv6

  A deletion also removes the other.

  What is happening with these ipv6 ACLs, why they are not blocking all traffic? Why do I get an acl "role-based" too? Is associated it with?

  Is there a another way to kill just any ipv6 on the SSID of COMMENTS XX traffic while leaving alone on others? That's all I need at this stage. If the ipv6 ACL do not work, perhaps this can be done (ab) using a service-policy or policy routing? I'm ready to creative solutions :)

  PS. I know this is not the recommended method to configure a guest SSID, but it should still work IMO.

  You have encountered a bug I discovered a few months ago (CSCva17063), in your case, the workaround is to apply the ACL on the physical rather than the void interface interface (because you want to completely block IPv6 in any case). I write (more) my conclusions regarding the traffic that refusal on autonomous APs in a blogpost, might be interesting for you to read as well.

  Remember that the access point used as a bridge between the wired infrastructure and wireless, not as a router. There's some IOS routing of commands (like the "enable IPv6" command you pointed out) , but these are not the characteristics that should be used or need to be enabled on an access point.

  Because the networks internal and customer spend somewhere else, I would perform filtering on this device instead. Also sub gi0.2 interface is missing from your configuration, so I do not think that access as a guest is currently working at all?

  Please rate helpful messages... :-)

• access point does not

  Why the hell is the hot spot of my android bionic phone does not work with my Rt surface Tablet? I have ice cream sandwich on my phone

  I tried again after the update of the firmware and changed the name to my device. It worked last night.

  Problem solved!