Harvest access policy does not

Similar Questions

• Access policy does not change the status of resource

  I have a set access policy to assign a role and a resource to anyone in a specific group. The policy work very well for those who have never had the resource before. For people who were in a disabled state resource - access policy is to add the role, but it does not change the State of the resource from disabled to enabled (or put into service).
  
  How can I do so it adds not only the role, but he changes the State of the handicapped resource? Thanks in advance.

  Simple!

  -Create an adapter of the entity during the prior insertion of the Members Group.Group of the user who will be called on the user being part of the group. Add custom java code that will check the resource assigned to this user and confirm if its there and in a disabled state. If its disabled and then turn it back on, otherwise just hang on and do nothing.

  Thank you

  Sunny

• Access policy does not

  Hello
  
  I joined the OID to IOM and commissioning happens successfully when we through resources.
  Now, I created an access policy for auto supply OID to all new users that are created in IOM now count.
  Here are the details I gave for the access policy:
  
  Group: All USERS
  Renovation: unchecked
  Resource: OID USER
  
  After the user named in IOM, when check us the resource profile, OID is shown as commissioning validation task and the system itself is pending.
  
  Please suggest.
  
  Concerning
  Pavan

  See this user's group membership and profile resources. Can you see and the State of supply?

  If so, then in what task it is pending.

  If in the system validation then check the AutoSave on the process of definition of the OID or if it is current to another task, then paste the journal

• Portege R500 - TrueSuite Access manager does not work with IE 8

  TrueSuite Access Manager does not work with Internet Explorer 8

  Version:
  Internet Explorer: 8.0.6001.18702
  TrueSuite Access Manager 2.1.23.0

  Any idea?

  Thankx
  Robert

  Hello!

  Which laptop computer and operating system you have?
  And what do you mean with it doesn t work? You get an error message or something else?

  You must give us a little more information. Otherwise, we can t help you my friend.

  Good bye

• WRT150N access restrictions does not

  Good day everyone.

  I read the messages that are similar to my problem in the forum, but none of the suggested solutions solved my current dilemma.

  I use a WRT150N with firmware v1.00.5. I have a setup of Linux with Squid, connected to the network with the modem router 192.168.23.254. The WRT150N has a gateway of 192.168.23.1. The WRT150N is also connected to an Apple Base Station that serves as a Point of access for users of WiFi.

  Squid limits access to the IP addresses listed under the passerelle.254. But once I change my gateway to 23.1, everything is accessible. I want to block sites as well as on the WRT150N. But whenever I try to put a new restricted access, it does not work.

  

  I put in the IP addresses on which to apply this restriction:

  

  It ignores addresses is because addresses are reserved. I click on save settings here and I save the settings again on the home page.

  Whenever I try to test on the addresses given, I can still access the pages. Is there something that I am missing?

  Thanks in advance for your answers.

  Try to update / re Flash the firmware of your router.

  Connect computer with the Ethernet cable to the Ethernet port on the router.

  Download the firmware on the Linksys site.

  Open the router configuration page.

  Go to the tab Administration and go to the update of the Firmware tab sub.

  Browse and select the downloaded firmware and update the firmware.

  After the upgrade of the firmware reset and reconfigure the router settings manually.

  And see if that helps you.

• VeriSoft Access Manager does not work on Windows 7.

  VeriSoft Access Manager does not work on Windows 7. It worked on Windows Vista and 7 RC, but it now gives the error "this program blocked to compatibility problems. VeriSoft Access Manager is not compatible with this version of Windows. For more information, contact Cognizance Corporation. "He said that the problem file is AsGHost.exe. Any ideas how to solve this considereing that has worked in Windows 7 Release Candidate?

  This software is not yet compatible with Windows 7. I met the same problem. You must use different software to fingerprints. DigitalPersona works very well and can be downloaded from the HP website. Here is the link...

  http://h10025.www1.HP.com/ewfrf/wc/genericSoftwareDownloadIndex?LC=en&DLC=en&cc=us&softwareitem=ob-56930-1

• The Customer Service of group policy does not logon, access is denied.

  I tried to reboot in safe mode, but it does not log it. There is no secondary logon to use. The only record of restore point was forward who has not at the problem of the evening. Where can I go from here?

  Disable hide hidden files and Hide protected operating system files

  Open my computer

  Press ALT + T

  Click options, and then view the folder

  Click on show hidden files folders and drives

  Uncheck the Hide protected files BONES

  Then use the volume shadow copy service store to restore a previous backup of the ntuser *. * file

  To make this opening users profile folder in c:\users\

  Right-click on the name of the profile

  in the tabs list, click Previous Versions

  Choose the second most recent snapshot and click Open

  Copy all the ntuser files and paste them to the user profile folder c:\users\[profilename]

  replace all and restart

  Log in as the user

• Domain group policy does not work on a station

  Hello

  Been the last week reading everything that is available on the internet.

  Win 2008 R2 Standard

  Group Policy created and linked to an OU - ministere1

  in the AD, the container has users in it that the policy should apply to.

  everything works fine on PC1 for User1

  everything works fine on PC1 for User2

  does not work on PC2 or for User1 or 2

  RPC is enabled

  Domain controller - use the default

  gpupdate/force - shows update is successful

  Gpresult /R shows the groups appropriate for user 1 and 2 but can be applied strategy local politics

  is there something I need to turn it on to use the distributed domain GPO?

  BTW.

  politics is Frank - maps a network as a reader folder (checked the privileges and as said before - this works fine on PC1 but not on PC2)

  Both PC's are Win 7 64 bit Pro

  When you try to test the strategy side server it shows RPC server not available

  RSoP will also show access denied on PC2

  If you have any solution for this problem - please help

  In this case, Peter

  Hello

  Post your question in the TechNet Server Forums, as your question kindly is beyond the scope of these Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

  See you soon.

• Citrix Access Gateway does not connect after update June 17

  I am running Citrix Access Gateway on a Windows 7 64-bit Client computer and as updates on 17 June, it does not connect.

  Have you checked with Citrix technical support? This would be my first step. If they cannot help, contact the technical support of MS for Windows Update.

  Support for Windows Update -http://support.microsoft.com/gp/wusupport

  Visit the Microsoft Solution Center and antivirus security for resources and tools to keep your PC safe and healthy.  If you have problems with the installation of the update itself, visit the Microsoft Update Support for resources and tools to keep your PC updated with the latest updates.

  If you are not in the Canada or the United States, there are numbers to contact local support here:http://support.microsoft.com/common/international.aspx
  MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• How to get our app on a BES client (policy does not allow downloading applications)

  Hello.

  I'm in a bit of a link here.

  We launched our application in November of last year. It is available on App World and our customers were downloading it very well so far.

  One of our customers sent us a few days ago an email asking how they could 'push' our application to their employees through their Blackberry Enterprise Server. I've never worked with before BES and had no idea what they were talking about.

  I asked them if their blocked policy used to download apps from App World and unfortunately they said yes.

  Now, during our beta-test phase, I had our testers download from our server by linking to our .jad file. Could this be the same design for better?

  How the client business "grow" our application to their employees? Do I have to send them our COD files?

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Hello!

  There are a few options that the company might use:

  (1) to grow in fact the customer request would need the COD and ALX files (note, not brother COD files [ending-# .cod] but together main COD files). They can index the latter on their BES and push them to a subset of employees.

  (2) if the company uses BES 5.0.3 then they can actually afford to App World and only allow certain applications to be accessible. This may be a better approach, because it does not require the developer to provide the COD and ALX files, will the upgrade path normal app and will be much easier to maintain for both parties.

  See you soon,.

• Ipv6 access list does not apply autonomous Aironet 3602I-E

  As you can see in the attached config I configured two SSID (2G & 5 G) for a third (2G only) SSID and PEAP WPA2-Ent on the vlan 2 for 'poor team access as guest '.

  Basically I forced the Dot11Radio0.2 interface in the Group of deck 1 to get all three SSIDS on vlan 1 (since I want just a quick way and dirty to allow its customers access to the internet, without having to configure a vlan separate everywhere).

  The guest SSID (XX COMMENTS) allows tkip in addition to BSE and uses a PSK rather than PEAP. Access lists configured on Dot11Radio0.2 IPv4 allows clients connected to this SSID get an IP by DHCP, use the DNS servers on the local network and access the internet. All other traffic for the local network is blocked by access lists guest_ingress and guest_egress.

  This all works very well, ipv4 is blocked for guests invited as expected. However, ipv6 is something different. For some reason, the ipv6 access list is completely ignored.

  Because I don't need ipv6 for guest access, I thought that I have completely block and do with it. As you can see I have this set:

  interface Dot11Radio0.2
  guest_ingress6 filter IPv6 traffic in
  guest_egress6 filter IPv6 traffic on

  and these ipv6 access lists have a rule of "refuse a whole" only. Yet, the XX COMMENTS SSID connected client gets an ipv6 address of the server on the LAN DHCP6 and has full connectivity. For ipv4, that I had to explicitly allow DHCP packets to the client not even get an IP, so the ipv6 access lists are not clearly applied.

  No matter if I move the access interface Dot11Radio0 instead lists, they don't do anything. I thought that maybe I should add a "enable ipv6" on the Dot11Radio0.2 interface (even if ipv6 traffic was very good, even where it shouldn't), but when I set "enable ipv6" Dot11Radio0 or Dot11Radio0.2 the radio goes into a sort of infinite loop of reset:

  000261: Sep 23 2016 22:32:50.512 it IS: % DOT11-5-EXPECTED_RADIO_RESET: restart Radio Dot11Radio0 interface due to the reset of the interface
  000262: Sep 23 2016 22:32:50.516 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to down
  000263: Sep 23 2016 22:32:50.524 it IS: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to reset
  000264: Sep 23 2016 22:32:51.516 it IS: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on the Interface Dot11Radio0, state change downstairs
  000265: Sep 23 2016 22:32:51.560 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to
  000266: Sep 23 2016 22:32:51.568 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to down
  000267: Sep 23 2016 22:32:51.576 it IS: % LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to reset
  000268: Sep 23 2016 22:32:52.608 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to
  000269: Sep 23 2016 22:32:53.608 it IS: % LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to
  000270: 22:32:53.608 Sep 23, 2016 it IS: % DOT11-5-EXPECTED_RADIO_RESET: restart Radio Dot11Radio0 interface due to the reset of the interface
  000271: Sep 23 2016 22:32:53.612 it IS: % LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed State to down
  etc.

  In addition, when creating a list like this ipv6 access:

  guest_egress6 IPv6 access list
  refuse an entire ipv6

  The other is automatically created:

  IPv6-guest_egress6 role-based access list
  refuse an entire ipv6

  A deletion also removes the other.

  What is happening with these ipv6 ACLs, why they are not blocking all traffic? Why do I get an acl "role-based" too? Is associated it with?

  Is there a another way to kill just any ipv6 on the SSID of COMMENTS XX traffic while leaving alone on others? That's all I need at this stage. If the ipv6 ACL do not work, perhaps this can be done (ab) using a service-policy or policy routing? I'm ready to creative solutions :)

  PS. I know this is not the recommended method to configure a guest SSID, but it should still work IMO.

  You have encountered a bug I discovered a few months ago (CSCva17063), in your case, the workaround is to apply the ACL on the physical rather than the void interface interface (because you want to completely block IPv6 in any case). I write (more) my conclusions regarding the traffic that refusal on autonomous APs in a blogpost, might be interesting for you to read as well.

  Remember that the access point used as a bridge between the wired infrastructure and wireless, not as a router. There's some IOS routing of commands (like the "enable IPv6" command you pointed out) , but these are not the characteristics that should be used or need to be enabled on an access point.

  Because the networks internal and customer spend somewhere else, I would perform filtering on this device instead. Also sub gi0.2 interface is missing from your configuration, so I do not think that access as a guest is currently working at all?

  Please rate helpful messages... :-)

• Access list does not work

  unbenannt.PNG

  

  I want that no package would leave f0/0 (R2).

  Here is my configuration:

  R1:

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  R2:

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  IP 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0

  IP access-group 101 out

  !

  access-list 101 deny ip any one

  !

  Given the configs shown in the original post R2 will be able to ping to R1 and I guess this (or something very similar) is what brings the original poster said that the ACL does not work.

  The problem here is that a list of access applied on an interface will not process the traffic generated by the router itself. The illustrious ACL will be very effective in preventing transit traffic (traffic that came from somewhere to R2 and must be DISPATCHED f0/0). But it will not work on the packages generated by R2.

  HTH

  Rick

• ACS network access Restriction does not. He denies it, but allow.

  I have a problem with the restrictions of access to the network on the Group of ACS configuration.

  I configured the NAR in a group field and set it to deny access besed on client AAA, a wireless LAN controller.

  But users of this group is still able to connect wireless controller.

  Newspapers in GBA shows that the fields are right. the right user in the right of the group in good AAA client, but does not deny.

  Put in place DNIS also supports the restriction. This is how it should be configured,

  -Procedure for the configuration of NAR:

  (1) go to User Configuration---> select the user name that you want to restrict.

  2) go into Restrictions on access network (OAN) option.

  (3) by user defined network access Restrictions.

  (4) check "define CLI/DNIS-based access restrictions.

  (5) select "reject the call or Access Point.

  (6) in the dropdown AAA client list - select the name of the device on which the user does not connect.

  (7) for Port - Development *.

  (8) in CLI - use *.

  (9) for DNIS - development *.

  (10) click on submit

  Kind regards

  ~ JG

  Note the useful messages

• RMAN retention policy does not log source archive

  Oracle 11.2
  Windows server 2008
  CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY TO SAVED 1 TIME TO THE DISK.
  
  I ran after command
  TIME BACKUP ARCHIVELOG ' SYSDATE-6' UNTIL ' SYSDATE-1';
  
  RMAN > ARCHIVELOG BACKUP OF TIME ' SYSDATE-6' until ' SYSDATE-1';
  
  From backup may 29, 13
  using the control file of the target instead of recovery catalog database
  allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1
  channel ORA_DISK_1: SID = 386 type device = DISK
  allocated channel: ORA_DISK_2
  channel ORA_DISK_2: SID = 773 type device = DISK
  jump the C:\ARC\ARC0000000564_0808506935.0001 archived log file; already supported
  up to 1 times
  \\172.16.1.2\DATABASE_BACKUP\RMAN\ARCHIVE_34\ARC00 of the archived log file skipping
  00000564_0808506935.0001; already saved 1 time
  \\172.16.1.2\DATABASE_BACKUP\RMAN\ARCHIVE_34\ARC00 of the archived log file skipping
  00000565_0808506935.0001; already saved 1 time
  jump the C:\ARC\ARC0000000565_0808506935.0001 archived log file; already supported
  up to 1 times
  \\172.16.1.2\DATABASE_BACKUP\RMAN\ARCHIVE_34\ARC00 of the archived log file skipping
  00000566_0808506935.0001; already saved 1 time
  jump the C:\ARC\ARC0000000566_0808506935.0001 archived log file; already supported
  up to 1 times
  jump the C:\ARC\ARC0000000567_0808506935.0001 archived log file; already supported
  up to 1 times
  \\172.16.1.2\DATABASE_BACKUP\RMAN\ARCHIVE_34\ARC00 of the archived log file skipping
  00000567_0808506935.0001; already saved 1 time
  jump the C:\ARC\ARC0000000568_0808506935.0001 archived log file; already supported
  up to 1 times
  \\172.16.1.2\DATABASE_BACKUP\RMAN\ARCHIVE_34\ARC00 of the archived log file skipping
  00000568_0808506935.0001; already saved 1 time
  \\172.16.1.2\DATABASE_BACKUP\RMAN\ARCHIVE_34\ARC00 of the archived log file skipping
  00000569_0808506935.0001; already saved 1 time
  jump the C:\ARC\ARC0000000569_0808506935.0001 archived log file; already supported
  up to 1 times
  \\172.16.1.2\DATABASE_BACKUP\RMAN\ARCHIVE_34\ARC00 of the archived log file skipping
  00000570_0808506935.0001; already saved 1 time
  jump the C:\ARC\ARC0000000570_0808506935.0001 archived log file; already supported
  up to 1 times
  Backup finished 29 May 13
  
  RMAN >
  
  
  According to policy to delete rman does not delete source archive logs.

  This is the backup... command where the delete command

  obsolete report;

  Confirm if the archivelog you want to remove, then

  remove obsolete;

  so if you had manually deleted archivelogs use below to remove the entry of records controlfile

  overlap archivelog all;

  list expired archivelog all;

  REMOVE EXPIRED ARCHIVELOG ALL;

  edited part-

  read [url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/backup.111/b28270/rcmconfb.htm#CHDCFHBG]

  This plocy deletion makes these archivelog eligible for deletion. They will be deleted automatocally if they are inside the FRA FRA is short of space.

  Published by: Patricia kebe on May 29, 2013 01:16

• Vmware server Web Access 2 does not work

  Dear vmware community:

  First of all thank you for taking the time to read this.

  I have a problem that looks like this isn't the first time that this happens, Yes, I was still unable to find an adequate solution.

  We have vmware server 2 is installed on a Debian 5 machine. Until yesterday, it was working fine.

  Today, when I tried to access to via web browser as usual, the page not load (the browser would say 'done, but the name of the page says "Loading").

  We have one of the virtual machines that are configured to start automatically, and it does not work as expected. The other I can't handle because I can't have the vmrun run perhaps (related?). So far, the only things that doesn't seem to work is web access only.

  There is one thing to note: after a restart of the computer, or restart the vmware mgmt, the service called "VMware Virtual Infrastructure Web Access" would show anything (while other services say "done" at the end of each line).

  I saw other people with similar problems here, and generally the solution was to reinstall the vmware server all on this machine. I would avoid this of course.

  Did someone already experienced this? Where I can look for more information on the VMware VI Web Access service won't start not (I do not know where are stored the logs of this service, maybe that can help).

  Please let me know if I should add any information, such as newspapers, etc.

  Thank you in advance!

  Hello

  I would recommend you check carefully this post and this post another may also help.

  Have you checked the vmrun documentation? Take a look at the file that I downloaded on this post.

  I would like to know if one of my tips work for you (or not)

  Best wishes / Saludos.

  Pablo

  Please consider providing any useful answer. Thank you!! - Por favor considered premiar las useful responses. ¡¡MUCHAS gracias!

  Virtually noob blog