you place your order of rows based on the values

Similar Questions

• You place your order by number.

  Hello
  I have a report that I would like to order by order of calendar. By that, I mean I already know the order in which I'm supposed to get these results. This is what the data would look like.
  

  Student Category      Total Students     Total Fee Amount
  =========================================================
  61                              9999       999,999,999.00
  64                              9999       999,999,999.00
  6A                              9999       999,999,999.00
  65                              9999       999,999,999.00
  66                              9999       999,999,999.00
  67                              9999       999,999,999.00
  68                              9999       999,999,999.00
  68A                             9999       999,999,999.00
  69                              9999       999,999,999.00
  60                              9999       999,999,999.00
  48                              9999       999,999,999.00

  As you can see that if I stopped my request based on the category student, then 48 would come up to high and 6 would come after 69 so spoil the order. My question is:
  
  Is there a simple solution or this would require the construction of a PL/SQL table? Don't want to spend too much time, if it's really not as simple as that.
  
  For any help or suggestion is welcome.
  
  Thank you!

  Try something like this:

  order by decode(student_category
                 ,'61',1
                 ,'64',2
                 ,......
                 ,'48',11
                 ,0
                 )
  

• Preloader you place your order

  Hi, I'm replenish items are several tutorials on different sites to create my own slideshow based on xml with correlated images. It works great except that I am not able to control the order in which the images are loaded. They get loads in the order that they are downloaded, not in order of my XML file. It is that is causing the links and other attributes that I put in my xml doc, to fall out of sync.
  
  I guess that there is a way to push my items in a specific order, or make sure that the additional attributes are loaded at the point where the image is pushed into the table. I guess some context would help (see attached code)
  
  I think that I have provided all the relevant information, but if you need to see another feature let me know.
  
  Yet once, in charge of everything very well when I test locally, it's just that the order is out of sync when I actually download the items. The heavier images are transferred backward, even though these attributes are in the right order.
  
  I really wish to keep pictures in the order of the XML doc, but if this is not possible I need to at least be able to make sure that the attribute values are assigned to the correct image container. I don't know where and how.
  
  Thanks in advance!
  
  

  Try:

• You place your order for recovery disc for mini 110

  Hello world

  first of all, I say this isn't really a laptop, I have a mini 110-3610sa.

  I've upgraded to windows 7 Professional to windows 7 basic, whatever he was going well until I stopped

  I lost the HP quick web and also the restoration of the factory, it goes to the windows recovery.

  can help you, I would really like to have fast web back it was very good and I was getting just configured with e-mails and fav sites.

  any help

  Ron tinydamed

  You can order recovery disks by following the instructions in the link below

  http://h20000.www2.HP.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/document.jsp?objectID=c00810334

• You place your order for dashboards

  Hello world
  
  I want to sort the dashboard at the top of the screen. For now, they are sorted in alphabetical order, but I want to sort by a custom order. I know that I can put a number in front of it, but I don't like the idea of having numbers on the dashboard menu. In the past, I thought I was able to put spaces "" in front of a dashboard I wanted to ordered first, but for some reason, I can't it works again.
  
  Is it possible to order dashboards without putting the numbers in the names?
  
  Thank you!
  
  -Joe

  Vidal method would be the way to go if you want numbers. Don't know why the 'method of space' does not work.

  http://oraclebizint.WordPress.com/2008/04/02/Oracle-BI-EE-101332-changing-sort-order-of-dashboards/

• you place your order in xquery-distinct values

  I was surprised to see the return of the following different results, is this a bug in the XML Query rewrite, or is the order of not only guaranteed the distinct values?

  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production

  With partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options

  SQL > SELECT XMLQUERY)

  2 ' (string code points

  3 distinct-values ((99,98,97)))'

  4 ELECTION CONTENT) result

  5 FROM dual;

  RESULT

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  ABC

  SQL > SELECT / * + NO_XML_QUERY_REWRITE * /.

  () 2 XMLQUERY

  3 ' (string code points

  distinct-values ((99,98,97))) 4'

  5 ELECTION CONTENT) result

  6 FROM dual;

  RESULT

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  CBA

  SQL >

  Hello

  The specs say the order is "dependent application": fn: distinct values

  Summary so is (I guess), strict language point of view, should not rest on any apparent order in the resulting sequence.

  The results collected by the two queries probably be different for the same reason: different implementation.

  First one with XQuery Rewrite active is solved using the SQL operators and functions, something along these lines:

  SELECT 'CODEPOINT2STR_FUNC' ('SEQUENCE')

  DE)

  SELECT 'AGGREGATE_FUNC' (VALUE (T) SEPARATE) "SEQUENCES".

  TABLE ("SEQUENCE_FUNC"(99, 98, 97)) T

  ) ;

  While the second is evaluated by the XVM and apparently maintains the original order.

• Combine the rows based on the value of the column

  I try to combine lines based on a common value.
  
  Data in the table:
  Result A

  Player_ID   Player_Name  Team_Name  Points Sequence
  99999       John Smith    Bulls              50         1
  99999       John Smith    Pistons          14         2
  
  
  What i want in the output
  Result B
  
  Player_ID Player_Name Team_Name  Points
  99999     John Smith      Bulls           64 (50 for Bulls)

  Here are my main request...
  

  select player_id, player_name, team_name, points
  from
          (
            SELECT player_id, player_name, team_name, sum(points) sum_points
            FROM stats_data
            WHERE season_id = 2008
            AND points > 0
            GROUP BY player_id, player_name, team_name
            ) t
  ORDER BY sum_points DESC, last_name;

  Current query gives me the result of the result of A
  
  (1) not entirely sure how, to combine the player_id basic data
  2) once I found 1, I'm sure that by adding the ("sum_points" for "team_name") to the output can be done with a case statement, I think?

  Hello

  Thank you.

  Let me make sure I understand: If a player on two or more teams, the one with the largest value of the sequence appears in the column team_name. Others will be displayed, in the order of sequence, in the points column.

  This done:

  WITH     gb1     AS
  (
       SELECT     player_id, player_name, team_name, sequence
       ,     SUM (points)          AS sum_points
       ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY player_id, player_name
                                 ORDER BY         sequence   DESC
                         )   AS r_sequence
       ,     STRAGG (' ' || SUM (points) || ' for ' || team_name)
                OVER ( PARTITION BY  player_id, player_name
                        ORDER BY        sequence
                  )  AS all_points
       FROM     game
       GROUP BY  player_id, player_name, team_name, sequence
  )
  SELECT    player_id
  ,         player_name
  ,         MIN (team_name)  KEEP (DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY r_sequence)     AS team_name
  ,       TO_CHAR (SUM (sum_points))
         || MAX ( CASE
                        WHEN  r_sequence > 1
                   THEN  ' ('
                             || REGEXP_REPLACE ( SUBSTR (all_points, 2)
                                       , ' ,[^,]$'
                                  )
                      || ')'
               END
                  )  AS points
  FROM          gb1
  GROUP BY  player_id,            player_name
  ORDER BY  player_id,            player_name;
  

  The information listed in points (e.g. '(16 pour les TAUREAUX, 4 pour les PISTONS) ') requires the aggregation of the chain.
  [AskTom.oracle.com | http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100: 11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:2196162600402] shows several ways to do so.
  I used the first option on this page, the function defined by the user STRAGG, that you can copy from this page.

  You can have a similar function, the WM_CONCAT (property WMSYS), already installed.
  WM_CONCAT is not documented, so you can't use it in your Production applications.

• SQL question - aggregate rows based on the value of the columns

  Hi all

  DBA_EXTENTS reports on the number of starting point of measurement (column BLOCK_ID) and the size of the scale in the Oracle (BLOCKS column) blocks.

  I'm trying to combine the lines of the segments of same as if their associated extensions are adjacent.

  For example, assume that the data in the view are as follows:

  Nom_segment	Block_id	BLOCKS
  EMP	10	8
  EMP	18	8
  DEPARTMENTS	26	16
  DEPARTMENTS	42	8
  EMP

  5016EMP668

  And I want to do a set of results that looks like this:

  Nom_segment	Block_id	BLOCKS
  EMP	10	16
  DEPARTMENTS	26	24
  EMP	50	16

  I thought to use an analytical query, but I couldn't find something that meets this requirement.

  Can you please help?

  Hello

  Here's a way to do that using the analytical SUM function:

  WITH got_grp AS

  (

  SELECT nom_segment, block_id, blocks

  , block_id - SUM (blocks) over (PARTITION BY nom_segment

  ORDER BY block_id

  ) AS the grp

  FROM the data

  )

  SELECT nom_segment

  MIN (block_id) AS grp_block_id

  SUM (blocks) AS grp_blocks

  OF got_grp

  GROUP BY nom_segment, grp

  ORDER BY grp_block_id

  ;

  The data you posted in response to #3:

  Pini Dibask wrote:

  Thanks Frank,.

  If you would care to post CREATE TABLE and INSERT to your sample data and the version of your database, then I could show you exactly.

  The Oracle version is 11.2.0.4

  This is the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for the sample data:

  CREATE THE TABLE DATA (NOM_SEGMENT VARCHAR2 (20), BLOCK_ID NUMBER, NUMBER OF BLOCKS);

  INSERT IN DATA VALUES ("EMP", 10, 8);

  INSERT IN DATA VALUES ("EMP", 18: 8);

  INSERT IN DATA VALUES ("DEPARTMENTS", 28, 16);

  INSERT IN DATA VALUES ("DEPARTMENTS", 42, 8);

  INSERT IN DATA VALUES ("EMP", 50, 8);

  INSERT IN DATA VALUES ("EMP", 66, 8);

  is not the same as the data in your first post and the results are not the same, either.

  The fixed difference technique involves lines don't overlap.  In the sample data in response #3, 'DEPARTMENTS' lines overlap, i.e. blocks 42 and 43 belong to two segments.

• order by clause based on the value of the parameter

  Hello
  
  I use reports 6i with db 10 g
  
  I need to create a report sorted in the order of four fields. There is a field selection parameter which should come first in the order by clause.
  
  IE the user has available to display the report in a sorted order selected
  
  Assume that the four fields are emp_id, name, dept_id desig.
  
  If the user selects dept_id, then the order by clause should be in order of dept_id emp_id, name, desig
  
  Please help solve this scenario.
  
  Thank you

  Hi Clement,.

  Use the query as follows:

  select column_name1, column_name1, ....
  from  table_name
  &order_by_clause
  

  Now in the trigger AFTER-PARAMETER-SHAPE has the order by clause below according to requirements:

  if :sort_column = dept_id then
  
    :order_by_clause := 'order by dept_id,emp_id,name,desig';
  
  else
  
    :order_by_clause := 'order by emp_id, dept_id, name,desig';
  
  end if;
   
  

  Here's sort_column setting user who will be selected by the user, provide the list of values for it.

  Hope this helps

  Best regards

  Arif Khadas

• Filtering rows based on the value of the field

  Hello
  
  I have something like this:
  
  create table stuff
  (
  Avalue varchar2,
  anothervalue varchar2,
  thirdValue varchar2,
  aNumber number
  )
  
  INSERT INTO stuff Values ('abc', 'cde', efg', 2);
  INSERT INTO stuff Values ('abc', 'cde', efgggg', 4);
  INSERT INTO stuff Values ('abc', 'xxx', efg', 1);
  INSERT INTO stuff Values ('abc', 'xxx', efgxxx', 2);
  INSERT INTO stuff Values ('abc', 'yyy', efg', 2);
  
  I would like to receive the lines with the most "anumber" - value, grouped by "value" and "anothervalue" (but not "thirdvalue"). So, in this example, I want to rank 2, 4 and 5.
  
  Someone has an idea? I think that a 'order by desc"isn't the best way here?

  select  avalue,
          anothervalue,
          thirdvalue,
          anumber
    from  (
           select  s.*,
                   rank() over(partition by avalue,anothervalue order by anumber desc) rnk
             from  stuff s
          )
    where rnk = 1
  /
  
  AVALUE     ANOTHERVAL THIRDVALUE    ANUMBER
  ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
  abc        cde        efgggg              4
  abc        xxx        efgxxx              2
  abc        yyy        efg                 2
  
  SQL> 
  

  SY.

• You place your order on the Apple Site

  I ordered a 7 IPhone September 21, as it was very
  hard to get one at the store here in Rome, Italy
  at that time. Today, 7 October, I see that the IPhone is available to any
  store, but I have still not received my... and shipping follow-up shows that
  the phone is always located in Amsterdam, Holland. This means that it will be
  probably need another 7 days to be delivered to me! Now, I want to only disclose my
  concern that I think that what makes an online prescription should be advantaged
  otherwise it's not really a reason to buy
  an article on the Web Site!

  And this is the last time I'll do so!

  Thank you!

  Greetings from Rome

  !

  Don't know what your question on the iTunes Store, but you already know that you talk only to other users on these forums and that Apple are not here - if you want to contact Apple using the 'contact us' link at the bottom right of each page here.

• You place your order of cross-directories

  Hello

  I need your help.

  I want to browse directories and order all the files by date.

  I used this command:

  cmd /c dir "c:\nuovacartella" / b/s A:-D / o:-d

  but the files are classified at the folder level.

  See the example:

  /C dir "c:\nuovacartella" C:\>cmd / b/s /A:-D / TC o:d

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\uno.txt

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\AAA\ciao.txt

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\AAA\due.doc

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\AAA\tre.xsl

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\AAA\appenaCreato.rar

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\BBB\B2\son a file.txt

  file Link\son a c:\nuovacartella\cartella

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella Link\uno

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella Link\appenaCreato

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella Link\ciao

  /C dir "c:\nuovacartella" C:\>cmd / b/s /A:-D / TC o:-d

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\uno.txt

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\AAA\appenaCreato.rar

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\AAA\tre.xsl

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\AAA\due.doc

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\AAA\ciao.txt

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella file\BBB\B2\son a file.txt

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella Link\ciao

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella Link\appenaCreato

  c:\nuovacartella\cartella Link\uno

  file Link\son a c:\nuovacartella\cartella

  but I want the files classified into cross-folder.

  Is it possible to do so (for example, using a batch script)?

  Thanks in advance. Leonardo

  Hi Leon,

  Thanks for posting your question in the Microsoft Community!

  I suggest you to ask your question on the MSDN Forums.

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories

  Hope this hslps.

• You place your order by number Char field

  I have a char with data field.

  Required order is lower.

  Column1

  -------------

  12

  12-A

  12-B

  122

  122-A

  122-C

  123

  123-A

  123-B

  I have to order both at the level of form and report.

  Pasha

  Lahore, Pakistan

  The 'trick' is pad strings or a part of them to the same length. In your case, it may be sufficient for the whole string if lpad suffix (A, B, C) are always of length 1.

  Otherwise, you will need to split the string at the position of the hyphen and lpad for both parties.

  Ah, now I see that you do not always have a suffix. Just so add an artificially.

  As the length, you must choose a value greater or equal to the maximum length of the string or their parts RESP.

  order by lpad (decode (instr (column1,'-'), 0, column1 |)) ((' - 0', column1), 10, '0')

  or

  Select Column1 from)

  Select

  Column1

  , max (length (decode (instr (column1,'-'), 0, column1 |))) (((' - 0', column1))) on len)

  tab

  )

  order by (lpad, len, '0')

• You place your order by comparing - SQL Experts pls help

  Hi all
  
  I want to measure the closest points according to the percentage between these points and order.
  in other words, I want to show the relationship between the points according to the percentage value.
  

   
  drop table temp_value; 
  create table temp_value(id number(10),location varchar2(20), percentage number(9)); 
  
  
  insert into temp_value values  (1,'LOC 1,2',30); 
  insert into  temp_value values (2,'LOC 1,3',0); 
  insert into  temp_value values (3,'LOC 1,4',0); 
  insert into  temp_value values (4,'LOC 1,5',0); 
  insert into  temp_value values (5,'LOC 1,6',50); 
  insert into  temp_value values (6,'LOC 2,3',0); 
  insert into  temp_value  values(7,'LOC 2,4',0); 
  insert into  temp_value values (9,'LOC 2,5',0); 
  insert into  temp_value values (10,'LOC 2,6',10); 
  insert into  temp_value values (11,'LOC 3,4',90); 
  insert into  temp_value values (12,'LOC 3,5',80); 
  insert into  temp_value values (13,'LOC 4,5',0); 
  insert into  temp_value values (14,'LOC 4,6',0); 
  insert into  temp_value values (15,'LOC 5,6',0); 

  I want the output like this, the ranking of the point like this

   
  4 
  3 
  5 
  6 
  1 
  2 

  or like this

    6 
  1 
  2 
  4 
  3 
  5 

  If you ask me why I say this ranking only

   
  
  4    [90 percent between point 3,4 that mean can be 3,4 or 4,3] 
  3 
  5    [80 percent between 3,5 that mean can be 5 after 3,4] 
  6    [50 percent between 1,6 that mean can be 1,6 or 6,1 ] 
  1 
  2    [ 30 percent between 1,2 that mean can be 1,2 or 2,1] 

  concerning
  
  Published by: Isabelle October 6, 2012 10:18
  
  Published by: Isabelle October 6, 2012 10:43
  
  Published by: Isabelle October 6, 2012 20:04

  SQL> select loc
    2  from(
    3  select loc,rownum rn
    4  from(
    5  select percentage,location,regexp_substr(location,'\d+',1,rn) loc
    6  from temp_value a,
    7       (select 1 rn from dual union all
    8        select 2 from dual ) b
    9  order by percentage desc,to_number(regexp_substr(location,'\d+',1,rn)) asc
   10  ))
   11  group by loc
   12  order by min(rn);
  
  LOC
  --------------------
  3
  4
  5
  1
  6
  2
  
  6 rows selected.
  

• You place your order with a reports folder

  Hi all
  
  I have a problem in sequencing the name of reports, the present system automatically organizes the reports based on alphabetically as below
  
  A
  B
  C
  
  I want the order to be as below, is that possible? I want reports to be arranged according to our use.
  
  A
  C
  F
  B
  
  Please confirm if this is possible.
  
  Thank you
  Natraj

  Hi Ludovic,.

  Maybe you can just put a number before the name of reports to change the sequence:

  1A
  2 C
  3 F
  4 B

  I don't know of any other possibility.

  Best regards, Tim