10 TB of local storage still cannot attack / access or see more then the first to 1.09 ((vSphere 4.0))

I have a Dell 2950 PW Gen III with 6 X 2 TB SATA local disks. I created a single TB 10 disc with the RAID controller.   I have install and license vSphere 4.0 with no problems. But when I have great my 1st data store, it shows only 1.09 TB of space to do that in the breast. I don't see any disk space for apx 8 TB of storage is missing.

Build - ESXi 4.0.0 208167

Please provide and advise that you can.

ESX supports up to 2 TB LUNS less 512 b size, so you need to divide into smaller pieces of 2 TB storage space.

If you want a large store of data, you can do so from 5 2 TB LUN each with extents.

---

MCSA, MCTS, VCP, VMware vExpert 2009

http://blog.vadmin.ru

Tags: VMware

Similar Questions

  • Flash the disk errors "cannot find this point, located more in the computer.

    OK, I'm trying to copy a file to a flash drive.  It crashes when you try to copy and then gives me the error message "cannot find this point, located more in the computer.

    I tried to drag and drop several different files and file types, and I get the same error message.

    I tried several different flash drives and I get the same message. All flash drives that I tried on this computer work on other computers and I can drag and drop files on the flash drive.

    I've tried several different USB ports on my computer and I still get this message.

    Thus, the issue is not with my flash drive or the files I'm trying to copy because I tried several types of files and several different flash drives. I deleted the USB driver and reinstalled with no resolution.

    I use Windows 7 premium x 64

    Hello

    Thank you for the update from us.

    Since the issue is conflict pilot due to printer driver, the problem you are experiencing is specific to the printer driver. I suggest that you please contact the manufacturer of the printer support team for assistance.

    Hope this information helps, post us a problem with Windows, we will be happy to help you.

    Thank you.

  • Conditional compilation: "If the $$id cannot be set to a value, then the PLW-6003 warning message is reported.

    Hello

    So according to the documentation:

    Conditional Directives of Compilation using survey

    The directive of inquiry is used to check the compilation environment. The directive of inquiry is of the form:

    inquiry_directive ::= $$id

    A directive of inquiry can be preset as described in 'predefined help investigation with Conditional Compilation Directives' or be defined by the user. The following describes the order of the processing flow during conditional compilation is trying to solve a directive of inquiry:

    1. The id is used as a guideline for investigation in the form $$ id for the search key.
    2. Re-encoding algorithm is as follows: the string in the PLSQL_CCFLAGS initialization parameter is scanned from right to left, the search with id for a matching name (case sensitive); if it's recognized. The predefined survey guidelines are sought after; Done if found.
    3. Si le $$ id cannot be resolved to a value, then the PLW-6003 warning message is sent if the original text is not wrapped. The literal NULL is substituted as the value for undefined investigation guidelines. Note that if the PL/SQL code is wrapped, then the warning message is disabled so that the directive of inquiry not defined is not revealed.

    I take this means, if you $IF $$xxx.00 = $5 THEN... $END but have not set a $$xxx.00 with "alter session set plsql_ccflags" then you should expect an error.

    But I am unable to make this trigger, a warning, or an error, either by

    ALTER session set plsql_warnings = ' error: 06003. "

    or

    ALTER session set plsql_warnings = ' enable: all ';

    test configuration:

    SCOTT@ORCL> alter session set plsql_ccflags = '';
    Session altered.
    SCOTT@ORCL> alter session set plsql_warnings = 'enable:all', 'error:06003';
    Session altered.
    BEGIN
        $IF $$DEBUGON $THEN
            dbms_output.put_line('debug is on');
        $ELSIF NOT $$DEBUGON $THEN
            dbms_output.put_line('debug is NOT on');
        $ELSE
            dbms_output.put_line('debug is neither on nor off - DEBUGON IS NOT SET!');
        $END
       
    END;
    /
    show errors
    
    debug is neither on nor off - DEBUGON IS NOT SET!
    
    
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    
    
    No errors.
    SCOTT@ORCL>
    
    

    Miss me something; It is late after all; Thank you

    Jason

    The compiler warnings do not seem to work for anonymous blocks, only for named objects:

    dev1 > alter session set plsql_ccflags = ";

    Modified session.

    dev1 > alter session set plsql_warnings = ' enable: all ';

    dev1 > create or replace procedure p as
    2 start
    $3 $IF $DEBUGON $THEN
    4 dbms_output.put_line ('debug is on ');
    5 $ELSIF $ $DEBUGON $THEN NO
    6 dbms_output.put_line ("' debugging is NOT on");
    7 $END
    8 dbms_output.put_line (' ' in the procedure ');
    9 end;
    10.

    SP2-0804: Procedure created with compilation warnings

    dev1 > view the error
    P: PROCEDURAL errors

    LINE/COL ERROR
    -------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
    3/8 PLW-06003: directive of unknown inquiry ' $$DEBUGON '
    5/15 PLW-06003: directive of unknown inquiry ' $$DEBUGON '

    John

  • Popup of local storage that cannot be granted or denied

    Computer of my mother who is an iMac running the most recent version, has begun to show this popup last night when she goes on shockwave.com to play games.  It says something about the local storage and gives you the ability to allow or deny.  (Sorry I don't have a screenshot, but I'm on my computer after working with him for hours).  The problem is that you can not click or either allow or refuse - he won't do anything.  I tried the tab options and it would move but nothing if you hit enter or SPACEBAR.  The only way out is to leave the site.

    I don't really know a lot about Adobe Flash so bear with me please.  She uses Firefox, but the same thing happened in Safari when I went to shockwave.com.  He arrived in Chrome at the moment.  The computer is almost new and I checked and the last version of Flash has been installed.  Just to try it, I uninstalled Flash and reinstalled and exactly the same thing happened when I went to this site.  She says she's only seen on this Web site.

    I have Firefox configured to always ask before running it.  I changed it so that it always runs for this particular site, but the popup was always there.  I researched and researched and exhausted all the options I can think.  It is not just a matter of the popup is annoying, is the fact that it will not go away, or allow you to click on what it is about that.  My elderly mother has very limited abilities and understanding when it comes to technology and online security is a huge concern.

    Does anyone have ideas about what could possibly help?  I appreciate all the help and assistance.  Thank you.

    Yes, it's a symptom of our anti-clickjacking too careful logic.  This happens usually when something animated moves behind the dialog box, or sometimes, it's just specific resolution/zoom-level.

    Unfortunately, as a browser plug-in, it's really hard to say whether or not we are above the thing on the screen, and we do not accept clicks on the dialog boxes for security unless we know that you actually see them and not other thing (for example "click here to win! 1. '') superimposed on top of it.

    Honestly, in 2016, restrict the ability of content to store data locally is not really buy you something meaningful in terms of privacy and security.  If you want to avoid persistent tracking chips, your browser's private browsing mode is much, much more efficient, and we pay tribute to her.  We also clear the Flash Player local shared objects when you clear cookies from your browser (to the extent that your browser tells us that you have done this).  Aversion for Flash Player local shared objects is largely based in the superstition at this stage.  The ability for marketers to create followed resilient, persistent is much more powerful in native HTML and JavaScript.  Feel free to look through my feeding activity to find similar posts, where I pointed the academic research on the subject, etc.

    So, here's my pragmatic recommendation:

    Go to settings > Flash Player > storage and choose allow sites to record information on this computer

    Where you do not want websites to save persistent information, use the private browsing mode.

    This accomplishes two things:

    -Content stores data locally, while everything seems to work normally to the content.

    -Flash Player nor the content will throw errors or permission dialog boxes

    -All data is stored in a temporary location, which is destroyed when you exit your private browsing session

    This gives you the best possible user experience and the best defense against tracking in Flash and HTML/JavaScript.  If you are in the business to uniquely identify people, it is a general practice at this stage to use all the technologies available for the redundancy and resilience, including techniques of both local fingerprinting that on the server side, so just to "solve" the Flash Player vector by disabling LSO does not significantly help.

    Unfortunately, the threat of clickjacking requires us to implement solutions less than optimal and the decade or so of experience with very smart people working on it shows that it is a game of whack-a-mole.  It is best to avoid scenarios where the dialog box gets jumped by adding fields to the trust list, or simply by allowing access to the total of just.  The ideal solution would be to move these to the browser native user interface dialog boxes, but which requires buy-in from all browser vendors involved, etc..

  • I have given rights of domain users to log on locally, but still cannot connect (Server 2008)

    Hello. I ' using server2008r2 on virtualbox. I'm going through the 70-640 exam.

    I went through the steps described in this article http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee957044 (WS.10) .aspx to add domain users rights to login locally. I ran gpupdate/force and me rebooted the machine, but I can not yet connect locally. I get "you cannot connect because the logon method, you use is not allowed on this computer.

    Any ideas?

    I changed the default domain policy Instead of the default domain controllers policy. ::) Works now.

    Hello

    The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums. You can follow the link to your question:

    Windows Server 2008 IT Pro Networking Forum: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/windowsserver2008r2general/threads

    Kind regards.

  • Cannot search with voice contacts increased as the first letter

    Hello.

    Suppose you have these contacts in your field:

    1 Paco Porras

    2 Alfredo Aspid

    3 Oscar Ultimo

    You can find one by pressing "pp".

    You can find the other pressing on "a symbol for a symbol»

    But there is no way to find Oscar by name. If you try to enter 'Sym Sym o', the pre written an 'o', which does not match with 'o'.

    Would be nice if the pre ignore accented on the search characters.

    Any solution?

    Kind regards.

    The problem is resolved in 2.0.1: If you type a letter, it corresponds to two letters with an accent and without it.

    Thank you, Palm!

  • In a local storage folder, I can't view messages beyond a certain date

    My most recent e-mail messages in a particular local storage folder cannot be found. I get the message "loading" and nothing happens. I updated for Thunderbird 38.2 this morning and then noticed the problem. It's especially bad, because this block of emails contains most of my banking passwords online.
    My operating system is Windows XP Pro Service pack 3

    Right-click on the folder and select Properties, then on the button repair.

    Note that XP is probably the worst place you can think of to store passwords for banking these days. More out of support most at risk, as you become.

  • vSphere 6, impossible to use FT with local storage

    Hi guys,.

    Now that I understand that when you turn on FT without storage shared in any data warehouse results are displayed in dialog FT in the web client, I met a different problem (so the discussion topic).

    When I turn on FT for a virtual machine that is on the local storage, I'm now able to select data warehouses, but when I select the local storage for the secondary virtual machine, I get a lot of mistakes which tell me the secondary host cannot reach the .vmx file (of course - this is why I need shared storage - for these small files). Shouldn t FT copy the .vmx and all that has to be shared in the right place, because I said where it is? I need to move my VM to a shared storage, then move my VMDK and stuff for local storage manually?

    Here is a screenshot of the dialog box:

    Turn On FT Dialog.jpg

    Here are the current hardware configuration:

    ESX1:

    -IP: 192.168.220.51

    -Data warehouses: ESX1-LocalStorage and NFS

    ESX2:

    -IP: 192.168.220.52

    -Data warehouses: ESX2-LocalStorage and NFS

    My primary VM for FT is on ESX2 and try to get my high school on ESX1.

    Thank you!

    When I read about the new features of FT and it also replicates the storage, I also expect the ability to place FT VMs on non-shared storage. However, it seems that this is not an option (maybe in a later version, who knows).

    The vsphere availability Guide:

    Virtual Machine for the fault tolerance requirements

    ...

    • Virtual machines files should be stored on shared storage. Shared storage solutions include Fibre Channel, iSCSI (hardware and software), NFS and NAS.

    André

  • Options for sharing local storage

    I work with a test environment and familiarize myself with some of the more advanced options of VMWare.

    Currently, in our lab, I have a server that has a ton of direct-attached storage. We have a San were included in the budget by the end of this year, but in the meantime, I would like to use this server as a substitute of SAN.

    I'm looking for the cleaner way to do this under ESXi 5, preferably without spending any extra money. We have licenses for the VSA, but it seems that I can't use VSA without several servers in a cluster - which I did not. Is there a way to take advantage of VSA without creating a cluster VSA?

    Is there a way do this within VMWare infrastructure that does not involve using something like FreeNAS or a similar solution, which will eventually create giant VMDK files that I have to deal with? I mean, I could lift a virtual server with a huge VMDK attached and ask one of the software solutions to give me iSCSI targets, but it seems hardly elegant. I might just install FreeNAS on bare metal server, but then I lose the use of the VMS host server.

    Forgive me if this is basic - I did some research first. I am looking for a way to use the data store (s) on this machine for other servers who lack storage space.

    Edit - not sure I understand the question / Setup... If the server that has a ton of local storage is already running ESXi?

    "I'm looking for a way to use the data store (s) on this machine for other servers that don't have storage space" "

    With the exception of the magic and mirrors behind VSA, ESXi does not have the ability to share a local data store. This data store must live somewhere else and be introduced to several machines in the way of an NFS share, target iSCSI or FC LUNS.

    I was in that same boat a year ago--a company hired me on for a large project of VMware without realizing that the shared storage is the key to an installation of VMware. They ordered servers with cargoes of physical local storage. Oops. Finally convinced a SAN is the only way (this is also before the release of v5, therefore not VSA). We have since removed all disks, and have most of them redeployed elsewhere (a dedup backup on a physical computer).

  • VCB and Local storage

    HI - can someone point me in the direction of some documents/examples of use VCB MV stored backup to a local storage - I can't seem to find anything about the local memory, even if I don't know it is now supported.

    The only way to vcb on local storage is VCB LAN mode. Here are some details on this subject:

    http://dsumsky.blogspot.com/2008/09/VCB-basic-usage-VM-full-backup-with.html

  • ESX host with local storage recommended for the host partition table?

    Hi all

    I know that the best practical partition table should look like this:

    Mount Point

    Partition

    Size

    Description

    / dev/sda (primary)

    / Boot

    ext3

    250 MB

    Change of extra space for upgrades

    N/A

    SWAP

    1 600 MB

    Change the maximum size of Exchange service console

    /

    ext3

    5120 MB

    Change of extra space in the root

    / dev/sda (Extended)

    / var

    ext3

    4096 MB

    Create partition to avoid an overflow of root with log files

    / tmp

    ext3

    1024 MB

    Create partition to avoid an overflow of root with temporary files

    / opt

    ext3

    2048 MB

    Create partition to avoid overfilling root with the log files of VMware HA

    / Home

    ext3

    1024 MB

    Create partition to avoid an overflow of root with agent / user files

    vmkcore

    100 MB

    Pre-configured

    However with a system with local storage would you set it up the same way, and whatever it is must be amended to change to get ESX to write log files to the different partitions?  I would like to configure it for future expansion for when the enterprise package is configured.

    Yes, I would set up the same way with an ESX with local storage server and nothing needs to be changed for the vmekernel right at the partition/var - unless of course you want to write to a log server that you need to change a configuration file to point to the server logs.  If you talk to the ESX Enterprise license you willnot have to change partiition table-

    Also on something else if you don't have a SAN/NAS storage you will also need to create a VMFS partition on the local data store to host your virtual machines

    If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

  • HP ProLiant DL160 - cannot create the data with local storage (controller, no RAID) store

    Hi all. I appreciate your time and comments.

    Using VMware ESXi (initially), installation (VMware ESXi 5.5.0, 1331820) will very well (install on USB). Able to enter in the console of the vSphere Client, everything seems normal. Any attempt to use local storage, however, is filled with this error message: http://i.imgur.com/40ySsOS.png

    "It was not correct to specified parameters. Vim.Host.DiskPartitionInfo.spec"-" 'HostStorageSystem.ComputerDiskPartitionInfo' call for object 'storage system' on ESXi "< ip address >" failed. "

    I tried both the base (from VMware) installation disc and the "Custom" (HP) HP installation disk. Both have the same problem: all facilities, but local disks - as seen while - are not able to serve local storage. It worked very well (previous incarnation was as Server 2003 file server, no reported\noticed questions). It's not under warranty, its going to be used as a laboratory server. All this seems to work well.

    Specifics:

    HP DL160 G6

    Storage card: ICH10 6 Port SATA AHCI Controller

    Discs: 3 G MDL 500 GB 7200

    Controller and the disks are perceived by the system: http://i.imgur.com/3PAKQHL.png

    Can someone point me in the right direction on what to go here? Research on the error messages do not lead to a lot of help. I'll get more pending. I would be grateful.

    This could be a problem with the current data on the disk. I suggest clean you the partition info using the DD explained to the KB VMware: Troubleshooting in the add storage Wizard error: cannot read this disk partition information to see if that solves the problem.

    André

  • Cannot add local storage of 2 of the 3 armies VM

    I added 9 300 disks in concert at 9 different hosts. They have SAN connections shared between them all, and now I wanted to add 300 locally to each. I got the readers in the server, restarted the first and F8 to enter the config of the car and he saw the car, I added and saved the configuration.

    Restarted and went into the VI. a host to the top, as well as virtual methods... went to the Config tab on the host, storage adapters and verfiied I could see the new drive. Went to the storage and click Add storage. Chose the disk/lun and the next screen showed me my local drive. He added, and everything was fine.

    Then, on the same server, I went through all the above steps, until he showed on the storage adapter properties page, and he was there... But when I go to the store page and add storage, it does not appear there. Only my existing device SAN disks are. I reread the HBA and drives are all showing under the Smart Array P400i vmhba0 again. but only the first showed when I went to add it in VI.

    I have returned a 2nd, deleted the player, readded it and still no luck... anyone seen this?

    Yes seen that before, suppose that you connect to your virtual center to add local storage? Connect your VI client directly to the host, then add local storage, it will then appear

  • Cannot add local storage

    The internal ServeRAID controller shows two LUNS - LUNS RAID1 for ESX and the RAID0 which is empty and must become a VMFS volume. When you go to "add storage", it only shows the first unit number logic that ESX is on.

    How can I allow the second LUN VMFS?

    Thank you

    You try to do it from the VI connected through Virtual Center client? If so, try to connect to the CIV directly to the ESX host to add storage. I noticed before this local storage not allocated does not appear when management through Virtual Center.

  • Flash does not work in FF26, it works in Chrome and IE. I reinstalled FF and Flash several times. I can't adjust the setting of local storage for Flash either.

    Flash does not work on some web sites. I never had a problem before with flash on FF in the nearly 15 years that I've used FF. Recently it has stopped working for some reason any and on some flash sites does not, NHL.com and site of kid Herotopia being just two of them. I updated FF, Adobe flash, the reinstalled version them repeatedly deleted all the files that have been stored on my laptop; that is, profiles, saved favorite nothing that I could find in user accounts and in the local app, low local and roaming data folders. What is strange, is that I can't set the local storage for flash either. When I visit the Adobe site to view the Adobe Flash Player Settings Manager I can move the scroll bar, but cannot check the: allow third-party flash content to store data on your computer. I can't do it on a Web site where the flash does not work. When I try and it changed on any site that it goes back to zero. Not sure if it is a part of the problem. I got tired of many suggestions on the pages of material here, but nothing works. I even tried this http://forums.adobe.com/message/4566499#4566499#4566499

    The other strange thing is that I used to get the "warning: script does not" prompt that displays "a script on this page may be busy, or it may have stopped responding." You can stop the script now, or you can continue to see if the script ends. "sometimes when I would buy on Macy's.com. This is the only site that it happened.
    I know I have only little technical knowledge, but I have tried to figure this out for a few days and do not know what is happening. The only thing I can think is that I somewhere files corrupted causing this problem. I have just updated to Windows 8.1 tonight in the hope that can help, but nothing helped. I would be very disappointing if I couldn't use FF or must go back using Chrome and FF.
    Sorry for the posting long but no solution would be much appreciated.

    Hi jscher2000,.

    Yes, I followed essentially the: Manual steps: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/968190?page=5#answer-509209 you have posted.

    And after restarting Firefox, Flash worked. Thanks again for your post I could not find this solution on the Adobe forums until you have posted the link.
    Your expertise and your time is much appreciated.

Maybe you are looking for