19 "hertz S199WFP monitor range

Similar Questions

• Develop Module and the wide range of monitors

  Is the develop module drive different display of the other modules (library, Print, etc.)?

  I ask because I see different, richer and more saturated colors to develop, and a Google search turns up any complaints about this problem, which dates back to 2007.

  I have a Dell UP2516D monitor calibrated with an i1DisplayPro software and i1Profiler XRite.  This monitor is capable of 99% AdobeRGB.

  Having read the other threads on this topic, I checked the following:

  • The monitor is correctly calibrated
  • I have disabled the option of processor use chart
  • The ICC profile is version 2, not version 4

  It's worrying because during the export, the JPEG format resulting looks desaturated images, I see in the library, not the end result of my editing module in the develop module.  Here is a pair of screenshots.  In both cases, the small window is the exported image (JPEG) displayed in the Windows Photo Viewer. The largest window is a partial screenshot of Lightroom.  The screenshot was made by opening the JPEG and then exported by moving the Windows Photo Viewer on the top of the window of Lightroom.

  The first image shows the difference between JPEG format and what is seen in developing

  

  The second image shows the fact that the exported JPEG resembles what we see in the library view.

  

  The develop module is fundamentally different in how it sends image data to the screen?  Might it interact with the features of a Monitor wide gamut of cause this problem?

  Even if the answer is Yes, it does not explain why the effect is present even in the screenshots.  Take a screen capture, encode in PNG and then display in the Viewer Windows photo or other non-Lightroom software should eliminate special effects due to LR. The difference is always present in the screenshots, even when displayed on screens less capable, so there must be a problem of mismatch of actual color here.

  Yes, there is a difference, read here: in Lightroom color management

  I don't know, is the windows photo viewer color managed?

  If you are using a large monitor range, you can display the correct colors with an application that is color management. Otherwise, you will still see a shift/colorshift.

• [LR 5] Soft Proofing - Gamut Warning monitor vary with the profile of the printer?

  Hello

  There is something that I do not understand when you use the function of gentle fermentation in LR.

  The monitor Gamut Warning feature (top left icon of the histogram when Proofing is enabled) is supposed to show us what colors in the image can be reproduced on the screen. Right? If I understand correctly, the warning is calculated by comparing the current image (virtualized by LR in the Melissa RGB color space) to the display range (read active calibration profile).

  Then why LR different show "out of gamut" areas for display when I change the profile of the printer selected when using soft proofing? It's not logical for me.

  I missed something?

  Thanks in advance.

  Indeed, they are vague on this issue. My thinking on the subject comes to converse with people from Adobe here and elsewhere, as I'm sure that I'vce has discussed this issue on the forum before. As far as I know the caution monitor is supposed to be calculated after the conversion to the profile of the printer so that you get an idea if the soft resistant color is displayed accurately. This must be the correct behavior as waterproofing can really take a color either in or out of the monitor range. I'm not 100% sure on it though, but definitely, he explains how he behaves.

  Also, if you calibrate your screen and write a display icc v4 profile, the situation changes once again as today the display profile can actually contain a perceptual rendering intent, making it even less accurate and the assumption of simple linear conversions one-to-one between color spaces is not valid. Some calibration software packages do however, but there are a few exceptions.

  If you want to know if your image is outside the display profile, you can indeed deceive the test to allow you to select a display as the printer proofing profile profile. In principle, you can select a standard workspace such as prophotoRGB it and get results that make sense. But you certainly don't want to have a random printer profile chosen for the reasons cited above. I guess they could add some tricks to detect that you have selected the profile of the current view and not one profile of another to randomly display and then collapse the interface, but it's a case of edge I doubt Adobe would give priority to this. It works very well so simply, you realize that you have selected your profile screen like the printer proof profile.

• Including a new report of process monitor

  Hi all
  
  I was wondering is adding a new type of report on the Workbench under process monitor reports (default reports are: Process Monitor, Process Monitor with locks, all categories of process, process status period monitor range, process monitor sorted by location hierarchy) I might modify the information showed by this 'new report '.
  
  For example if I generate the process with locks monitor, it will display all only place that I have in my application, but I need this 'new report' to see the only some of these places filtered by an attribute, I supposs the correct way to do currently to locate and modify the script being called by the adapter to publish this report. The problem is that I can't find what is called script.
  
  I'm wrong and this publication process is done through a already compile library, a .dll file? If this is the case is anyway to replace this call?
  
  I hope I made my problem clear enough
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: HFMColUser on 26 - it is a-2011 15:41

  Hello
  Log on to FDQM (FDM) work bench customer, and then click Reports tab.

  Copy the report you want to edit and paste (I prefer to do it this way, we will create all the problems in the existing reports)
  change the description of the report.

  Right-click on the report now. Definition of report clcik properties, tab click SQL on the top.

  Now add vpartcatpercartesian.partname like '% E '. so, you will get only the localities beginning with E in your report.

  Published by: PadmajaV on August 27, 2011 03:15

• On the 2nd monitor color management

  In the file of Lightroom_3_help.pdf ("update 03/12/2010') provided with LR3 (p22 low), it is said:

  «Note: Lightroom does not color - the view from the library on the second monitor module.»

  Is this correct?

  I have two monitors: one about the Adobe RGB (a HP LP2475w) range and the other about sRGB (an old Samsung), as well calibrated and profiled.  However, if the same image is displayed in library view on both, the colors displayed on the second monitor are virtually identical to those on the first.  It's true, no matter who is the main screen of LR and that is the second monitor.  But if Lightroom isn't a not color-managed the second monitor, the image would be likely sent as ProPhoto, which seems very very pale any monitor were the other.  Even though Lightroom has made the image as sRGB always on the second monitor, then there will be a significant difference when the monitor range were the second monitor (apparently not managed).

  Anyone can shed some light on this?  My tests suggest that the second control is managed by color.

  The display is fully color managed on both screens for me. It must be

  supported the monitors thus or otherwise second would be completely useless. It's

  that is trivial to do so as long as your profiling solution supports it

  true for all Macs and most modern windows machines. To me, this looks like to the

  Manual is simply false and the s sentence a vestige of when they first

  added bi-ecrans support. I remember there being color bug

  with it, then where he could catch the wrong profile display. It comes

  clearly not true anymore.

  PS Adobe Gamma? This tool has been deprecated since many years! Person not

  in their mind has yet to use it. Material calibration tools are

  cheap and widely available today.

• Share Point 2013: When adding yammer app in the contents of this site I'm getting 'something went wrong '.

  Hello Experts,

  Greetings!

  When I add yammer app in the contents of this site I have 'something went wrong '.

  OS: Windows Server 2012

  2013 SharePoint with SP1 (current license: SharePoint Server with Enterprise Client Access License)

  DB: SQL Server 2012

  Correlation ID: 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f

  

  JOURNAL:

  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.40 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation correlation xmnv name of support data logging = 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f request (POST: http://SPDEV:1234/_layouts/15/addanapp.aspx?Source=http%3A%2F%2Fasi%2Ddev005%3A1234%2F%5Flayouts%2F15%2Fviewlsts.aspx))
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.41 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 Microsoft SharePoint Foundation authentication authorization agb9s average Non-OAuth request. IsAuthenticated = True, UserIdentityName = 0 # .w | SPDEV\sp_farm, ClaimsCount is 25 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 04:54:29.41 = 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation xmnv Site average correlation data logging / 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.42 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 acjjg deployment of SharePoint Foundation App average current user has System.Threading.Thread.CurrentPrincipal.Identity.Name = 0 # .w | SPDEV\sp_farm, System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent (). Name = NT AUTHORITY\IUSR, System.Web.HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name = 0 # .w | SPDEV\sp_farm.    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.43 (0 x 1894) of file 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation ak8dj high not available UserAgent, operations cannot be optimized.    at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFileStreamManager.get_UserAgent () at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFileStreamManager.CreateCobaltStreamContainer (SPFileStreamStore SPFS, ILockBytes ilb, Boolean copyOnFirstWrite, Boolean disposeIlb) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFileStreamManager.SetInputLockBytes (SPFileInfo & fileInfo, SqlSession session, PrefetchResult prefetchResult) at Microsoft.SharePoint.CoordinatedStreamBuffer.SPCoordinatedStreamBufferFactory.CreateFromDocumentRowset (Guid databaseId, SqlSession session, SPFileStreamManager spfstm, Object [] metadataRow, SPRowset contentRowset, SPDocumentBindRequest, dbreq, SPDocumentBindResults & dbres) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.GetDocumentContentRow (Int32 rowOrd, Object ospFileSt...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 04:54:29.43 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation ak8dj High... mMgr, SPDocumentBindRequest & dbreq, SPDocumentBindResults & dbres) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetFileAndMetaInfo (String bstrUrl, bPageView bytes, bPageMode bytes, Byte bGetBuildDependencySet, String bstrCurrentFolderUrl, Int32 iRequestVersion, byte bMainFileRequest, Boolean & pbCanCustomizePages, Boolean & pbCanPersonalizeWebParts, Boolean & pbCanAddDeleteWebParts, Boolean & pbGhostedDocument, Boolean & pbDefaultToPersonal, Boolean & pbIsWebWelcomePage, String & pbstrSiteRoot, Guid & pgSiteId, UInt32 & pdwVersion, String & pbstrTimeLastModified, String & pbstrContent, UInt32 & pdwPartCount, object & pvarMetaData, object & pvarMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders) , String & pbstrRedirectUrl, Boolean pbObjectIsList, Guid & pgListId, UInt32 & pdwItemId, Int64 & pllListFlags, Boolean & p...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 04:54:29.43 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation ak8dj High... bAccessDenied, Guid & pgDocid, Byte & piLevel, UInt64 & ppermMask, object & pvarBuildDependencySet, UInt32 & pdwNumBuildDependencies & pvarBuildDependencies, String, Object & pbstrFolderUrl, String & pbstrContentTypeOrder, Guid & pgDocScopeId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetFileAndMetaInfo (String bstrUrl, bPageView bytes, bPageMode bytes, bGetBuildDependencySet bytes, String bstrCurrentFolderUrl, Int32 iRequestVersion, byte bMainFileRequest, Boolean & pbCanCustomizePages, Boolean & pbCanPersonalizeWebParts, Boolean & pbCanAddDeleteWebParts, Boolean pbGhostedDocument, Boolean & pbDefaultToPersonal, Boolean & pbIsWebWelcomePage, String & pbstrSiteRoot) A Guid object pgSiteId, UInt32 & pdwVersion, String & pbstrTimeLastModified, String & pbstrContent, UInt32 & pdwPartCount, & pvarMeta...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  04:54:29.43 30/01/2016 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation high ak8dj... Data, object & pvarMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String & pbstrRedirectUrl, Boolean & pbObjectIsList, Guid & pgListId, UInt32 & pdwItemId, Int64 & pllListFlags, Boolean & pbAccessDenied, Guid & pgDocid, Byte & piLevel, UInt64 & ppermMask, object & pvarBuildDependencySet, UInt32 & pdwNumBuildDependencies, object & pvarBuildDependencies, String & pbstrFolderUrl, String & pbstrContentTypeOrder, Guid & pgDocScopeId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetFileAndMetaInfo (String bstrUrl, bPageView bytes, bPageMode bytes, bGetBuildDependencySet bytes, String bstrCurrentFolderUrl, Int32 iRequestVersion, Byte bMainFileRequest, Boolean & pbCanCustomizePages, Boolean & pbCanPersonalizeWebParts, Boolean & pbCanAddDeleteWebParts, Boolean pbGhostedDocument, Boolean & pbDefaultToPersonal, Boolean & pbIsWebWelcome...)    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  04:54:29.43 30/01/2016 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation high ak8dj... Page, string & pbstrSiteRoot, Guid & pgSiteId, UInt32 & pdwVersion, String & pbstrTimeLastModified, String & pbstrContent, UInt32 & pdwPartCount, object & pvarMetaData, object & pvarMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String & pbstrRedirectUrl, Boolean & pbObjectIsList, Guid & pgListId, UInt32 & pdwItemId, Int64 & pllListFlags, Boolean & pbAccessDenied, Guid & pgDocid, Byte & piLevel, UInt64 & ppermMask, object & pvarBuildDependencySet, UInt32 & pdwNumBuildDependencies, object & pvarBuildDependencies, String pbstrFolderUrl, String & pbstrContentTypeOrder, Guid & pgDocScopeId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetWebPartPageContent (Uri pageUrl, Int32 pageVersion, PageView Requestedview, HttpContext context, Boolean forRender, Boolean includeHidden MainFileRequest Boolean, Boolean, Bool fetchDependencyInformation...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 04:54:29.43 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation ak8dj High... ean & ghostedPage, String & siteRoot, Guid & siteId, Int64 & bytes, Guid & docId, UInt32 & docVersion, String & timeLastModified, Byte & level, object & buildDependencySetData, UInt32 & dependencyCount, object & buildDependencies, SPWebPartCollectionInitialState & initialState, object & oMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String redirectUrl, Boolean & ObjectIsList, Guid & listId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModuleData.FetchWebPartPageInformationForInit (HttpContext context, SPWeb spweb, Boolean mainFileRequest, take the path of String, Boolean, Boolean & isAppWeb Boolean & fGhostedPage, Guid & docId, a UInt32 object & docVersion, String & timeLastModified, SPFileLevel & spLevel, String & masterPageUrl, String & customMasterPageUrl, String & webUrl, String & siteUrl, Guid & siteId, & buildDe...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 04:54:29.43 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation ak8dj High... pendencySetData, SPWebPartCollectionInitialState initialState, String & siteRoot, String & redirectUrl, object & oMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, Boolean & objectIsList, Guid & listId, Int64 & bytes) in Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModuleData.FetchWebPartPageInformation (borrow context HttpContext, String path, Boolean, Boolean & isAppWeb, Boolean & fGhostedPage, Guid & docId, UInt32 & docVersion, String & timeLastModified, SPFileLevel & level, String & masterpageUrl, String & customMasterPageUrl, String & webUrl, String & siteUrl, Guid & siteId, object & buildDependencySetData) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModuleData.GetWebPartPageData (HttpContext context, String path (, Boolean throwIfFileNotFound) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPVir...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  04:54:29.43 30/01/2016 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation ak8dj High... tualFile.GetVirtualPathProviderCacheKey (String virtualPath) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPVirtualPathProvider.GetCacheKey (String virtualPath) at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetCacheKeyFromVirtualPath (VirtualPath virtualPath, Boolean & keyFromVPP) at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetVPathBuildResultFromCacheInternal (VirtualPath virtualPath, Boolean ensureIsUpToDate) at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetVPathBuildResultInternal (VirtualPath virtualPath, Boolean noBuild, Boolean allowCrossApp, Boolean allowBuildInPrecompile, Boolean ensureIsUpToDate, Boolean throwIfNotFound) at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetVPathBuildResultWithNoAssert (HttpContext context, VirtualPath virtualPath, Boolean noBuild, Boolean allowCrossApp, Boolean allo...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 04:54:29.43 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation ak8dj High... wBuildInPrecompile, Boolean throwIfNotFound, Boolean ensureIsUpToDate) at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetVPathBuildResult (HttpContext context, VirtualPath virtualPath, Boolean noBuild, Boolean allowCrossApp, Boolean allowBuildInPrecompile, Boolean ensureIsUpToDate) at System.Web.UI.MasterPage.CreateMaster (HttpContext context, VirtualPath masterPageFile, IDictionary contentTemplateCollection, TemplateControl owner) at System.Web.UI.Page.get_Master () at System.Web.UI.Page.ApplyMasterPage () at System.Web.UI.Page.PerformPreInit () at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain (Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest (Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  04:54:29.43 30/01/2016 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation high ak8dj... at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest () at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest (HttpContext context) at System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute () at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep (IExecutionStep step, Boolean & completedSynchronously) at System.Web.HttpApplication.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps (Exception error) at System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification (HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb) to the System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate (wr IIS7WorkerRequest, HttpContext context) at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper (rootedObjectsPointer IntPtr, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) to System.Web.Hostin...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  04:54:29.43 30/01/2016 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation ak8dj High... g.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification (rootedObjectsPointer IntPtr, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) at System.Web.Hosting.UnsafeIISMethods.MgdIndicateCompletion (IntPtr pHandler, RequestNotificationStatus & notificationStatus) at System.Web.Hosting.UnsafeIISMethods.MgdIndicateCompletion (IntPtr pHandler, RequestNotificationStatus & notificationStatus) at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper (IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification (rootedObjectsPointer IntPtr, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.43 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 files SharePoint Foundation aiv4w average worn 0MS to bind 29783 byte in the file stream 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.48 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 0x6FB7003 high ahjqp [forced due to the difference of logging, cached @ 30/01/2016 04:54:29.48, initial level: Verbose] SQL connection time: 0.0919 to Data Source = SPDEV; Initial Catalog = WSS_Content_YammerApp; Integrated Security = True; Enlist = False; Layout common = True; The size of the Pool of min = 0; Max Pool Size = 100; Connect Timeout = 15; Name of the SharePoint [w3wp] = application [2] 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f [WSS_Content_YammerApp]
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.48 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 ahh6f Web Content Management Publishing Cache high [forced because of the gap of logging, initial level: Verbose] CreatePageFromUrlNoUpperCase: SPListItem for url '{0}' has got.    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.49 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation General average aj007 skip refreshToken because the token in the memory isn't fresh 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.50 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation monitoring high b4ly leaving monitored range (EnsureListItemsData). Execution time = 13.7851 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.52 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 Web Content Management Publishing 98ee Cache medium try to store a checked out item (/ PAGES/YAMMEREXAMPLE.) ASPX) in the object cache.  Maybe it's because the extracted user navigates to the page, or it is possible that the SharePoint system account has the checked item.  To improve performance, you must set the property portalsuperuseraccount to the web application.  See the documentation for more information.    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.52 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation monitoring high b4ly leaving monitored range (CachedObjectFactory: Page caching to: / PAGES/YAMMEREXAMPLE.) ASPX). Execution time = 64.6914 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.54 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation gallery of apps average ahnhh sends request to Office.com with the following 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f URL: https://store.office.com/app/query?cmo=EN%2DUS&pmo=US&type=4&assetid=WA104218020&build=15%2E0%2E4569%2E1000&av=OSU150&origin=EC101785291&corr=%7B634c5a9d%2D8e11%2D703a%2D9cb1%2D3652a67fc35f%7D
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:29.61 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 alokv SharePoint Foundation received average market response of Office.com X-Machine App: eus2 - 000.retailer.osi.office .net, OmexStorefront_IN_3 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  01/30/2016 04:54:29.61 w3wp.exe (0x1894) 0x2160 SharePoint Foundation App Marketplace ahnhh Medium Sending Request to Office.com with the following URL:https://store.office.com/appinstall/unauthenticated?cmu=EN%2DUS&pmo=US&clienttoken=%3Cr%20v%3D%221%22%3E%3Ct%20aid%3D%22WA104218020%22%20pid%3D%22889100e1%2Dbb68%2D4619%2D92e2%2Db3ec7cbcb760%22%20cid%3D%220000000000000000%22%20did%3D%22%7BF107EF70%2D51F7%2D4C98%2D9114%2D228710B7E9D1%7D%22%20ts%3D%220%22%20sl%3D%22true%22%20et%3D%22Free%22%20ad%3D%222016%2D01%2D30T04%3A16%3A02Z%22%20sd%3D%222016%2D01%2D30%22%20te%3D%222017%2D01%2D29T04%3A16%3A02Z%22%20ss%3D%220%22%20%2F%3E%3Cd%3E%2FwrMK6hxyxBrm1NoQf80FiueXUSOOajR%2BnTrX93o9Ho%3D%3C%2Fd%3E%3C%2Fr%3E&ret=0&build=15%2E0%2E4569%2E1000&av=OSU150&origin=EC101785291&corr=%7B634c5a9d%2D8e11%2D703a%2D9cb1%2D3652a67fc35f%7D&corr=%7B634c5a9d%2D8e11%2D703a%2D9cb1%2D3652a67fc35f%7D 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:30.02 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 alokv SharePoint Foundation received average market response of Office.com X-Machine App: 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:30.02 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation monitoring high b4ly leaving monitored range (OfficeProxy.SendWebRequest). Execution time = 414.391 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:30.02 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 acjjg deployment of SharePoint Foundation App average current user has System.Threading.Thread.CurrentPrincipal.Identity.Name = 0 # .w | SPDEV\sp_farm, System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent (). Name = NT AUTHORITY\IUSR, System.Web.HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name = 0 # .w | SPDEV\sp_farm.    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:30.02 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation Deployment ahkn9 App high removal App with fingerprint digital yH + cZrtZa4ty6W6n0414 + oVNNb6E5W3jVfPcN4H9SDdXJibduRiJqy / WtHXc + VzLIXmgi3zAk + 6TkUFwDeQJMg == 743afc0a-d0a4-4640-987e-c72faf1b3863 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f site
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:30.03 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation App Deployment environment mq71 creating App with fingerprint digital yH + cZrtZa4ty6W6n0414 + oVNNb6E5W3jVfPcN4H9SDdXJibduRiJqy / WtHXc + VzLIXmgi3zAk + 6TkUFwDeQJMg == 743afc0a-d0a4-4640-987e-c72faf1b3863 site.    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:30.03 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 acjjg deployment of SharePoint Foundation App average current user has System.Threading.Thread.CurrentPrincipal.Identity.Name = 0 # .w | SPDEV\sp_farm, System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetCurrent (). Name = NT AUTHORITY\IUSR, System.Web.HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name = 0 # .w | SPDEV\sp_farm.    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:30.03 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation General 8nca support Application error when access _layouts/15/addanapp.aspx, error = the system account cannot perform this action.   to Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAppAdministrationSecurityContext.DemandUserIsNotSystemAccount (SPUser user) to Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPApp.CreateAppInstance (SPWeb web, CultureInfo installationLocale) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPApp.AsyncLoadAndInstall (Byte [] print, Stream appStream, web As SPWeb, Guid productId, a version, String title, Int64 expectedSize, SPAppSource source, String contentMarket, String marketAssetId, String tempIconUrl, String oauthAppId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.StorefrontBase.InstallApp (imprint of Byte [], Stream appStream, String oauthAppId, productId Guid, version, asset of the chain...    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  04:54:30.03 30/01/2016 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation General average 8nca... ID, String title, expectedSize Int64, Boolean isUpgrade, String contentMarket, String iconUrl) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.StorefrontBase.StartDownload (Guid productId, String oauthAppId, Boolean isUpgrade) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.StorefrontBase.AppDownload (Boolean isUpgrade, Boolean autoRedirect) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.StorefrontBase.Render (HtmlTextWriter writer) at System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal (HtmlTextWriter writer, a ControlAdapter adapter) at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain (Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 w3wp.exe 04:54:30.03 (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 tkau SharePoint Foundation Runtime unexpected System.InvalidOperationException: the system account cannot perform this action.    to Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAppAdministrationSecurityContext.DemandUserIsNotSystemAccount (SPUser user) to Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPApp.CreateAppInstance (SPWeb web, CultureInfo installationLocale) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPApp.AsyncLoadAndInstall (Byte [] print, Stream appStream, web As SPWeb, Guid productId, a version, String title, Int64 expectedSize, SPAppSource source, String contentMarket, String marketAssetId, String tempIconUrl, String oauthAppId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.StorefrontBase.InstallApp (imprint of Byte [], appStream Stream, String oauthAppId, Guid productId, a version String assetId, String title, Int64 expec...)    634c5a9d-8E11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f
  30/01/2016 04:54:30.03 * w3wp.exe (0 x 1894) 0 x 2160 SharePoint Foundation Runtime unexpected tkau... tedSize, Boolean isUpgrade, String contentMarket, String iconUrl) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.StorefrontBase.StartDownload (Guid productId, String oauthAppId, Boolean isUpgrade) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.StorefrontBase.AppDownload (Boolean isUpgrade, Boolean autoRedirect) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.StorefrontBase.Render (HtmlTextWriter writer) at System.Web.UI.Control.RenderControlInternal (HtmlTextWriter writer, a ControlAdapter adapter) at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain (Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) 634c5a9d-8e11-703a-9cb1-3652a67fc35f

  Please let me know how to solve.

  Tons of thanks in advance.

  Siva

  Hello

  Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

  Please repost your Question in the MSDN Forums for SharePoint:

  https://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/Office/en-us/home?category=SharePoint

  Or in the TechNet Forums for SharePoint:

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Office/en-us/home?category=SharePoint

  SQL Server TechNet forums.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/SQLServer/en-us/home?category=SQLServer

  See you soon.

• Printed photographs are always darker than on screen

  I use Photoshop CS 6 on a Mac Mini with Mountain Lion (10.8.5). I calibrated my screen very carefully. When I print pictures, I set always Photoshop manage colors, or substitute the color settings in the printer.

  I used to use a XP-750 Epson inkjet printer. In Photoshop, I use the profiles associated with this printer - and, of course, with the paper I print on - but I've always found that the prints were much darker than their appearance on the screen. I assumed that it was a whim of my printer.

  After an extreme paper jam had irreparably damaged the printer, I bought a printer Epson XP - 760 (although similar) which replaces the XP-750. To my surprise, the printed photos are always much darker than their appearance on the screen.

  Can anyone suggest a reason and a cure? When Photoshop is set to manage colors, can't change the settings of color-management of the printer itself.

  Words: calibration targets. Your screen is too bright, classic mistake.

  You can set the white screen point so that it is a Visual white paper correspondence. This applies to the color and luminance. This is a purely visual thing, according to ambient light, print look a light, even application interface (light grey classic being much better than the new interface is dark). You should see the white paper on the screen.

  Some people will tell you specific numbers, such as 120 cd/m². This is the wrong approach. Get this game and fall numbers wherever he wishes. It may be 80 or 160 can be.

  If you have a high monitor range with internal hardware to READ from the monitor calibration, you can leave the calibration software handle it. Otherwise, it is best to do this in the OSD controls. Once satisfied, run the calibration software, preferably set to the native white point if possible so that there is no additional setting on the video card.

  It also applies, BTW, to black. It must match the density of ink for paper max.

• The operation of the Photoshop color management

  Hey guys!

  I spent some time, research and try to understand the inner workings of the Photoshop color management and met much information unclear and contradictory, especially in what concerns the test format. I think I thought that some of them out, but (for ease of my sleep) I thought to ask direct questions, just to be sure. I guess it's more of a curiosity thing.

  I'm on a Mac OS X 10.8, Photoshop CS6, monitor calibrated from the standard range, working in sRGB for the web.

  (1) what I have gathered, to get a specific color as possible on my screen, all I have to do is the workspace sRGB or have images with embeded sRGB tag and including my calibrated monitor profile ICC loaded in OS X. In this way, all the images and colors in Photoshop will respect sRGB and my calibration profile will ensure that my monitor is in fact the correct sRGB color display (for as long as it's still capability). Fix?

  (2) I have met many 'practical advice' where people mention using the format of test > Monitor RGB as a way to monitor the colors for the web and then I saw people saying that's not true. As I understand it, the function of monitor RGB strips the tag embeded and does not take into account the workspace of the image, instead showing you the RGB values in the 'native' of the screen color space, which in my case would be sRGB-ish. Photoshop color management, but not the profile of calibration of displayaround a bit. Fix?

  (3) when the viewing a tag image sRGB, activating / disabling the test format: RGB Monitor on and outside has absolutely no effect. Am I right to assume that this is because the sRGB tag is getting 'off', but since the monitor is standard gamut, the native color space is always sRGB?

  What I find weird is when I change the display profile in OS X to my only calibrated for, for example, a generic RGB, activating / disabling the test format: Monitor RGB effect - changes in brightness of picture visibly. If my above hypothesis was correct, it shouldn't happen, right? Where my confusion.

  Thank you!

  Kris

  Many people overcomplicate it. It's actually very simple.

  1 Photoshop converts on the fly from the document on the monitor profile profile. As long as the monitor profile is an accurate description of the screen, it shows correctly regardless of the original document profile. That's the whole point of the color management, translation of one color space to another aspect/goal of maintaining.

  There is no particular reason to work in sRGB just because your monitor is (or close). However, you will not see directly the colors in the file that are outside of the monitor range.

  2. waterproofing to Monitor RGB is a quick test to see how the image appears without any color at all management. I guess it could be useful in some cases, when you need consistency to accuracy. Other than that, it is completely useless, that it shows what it looks like on your system. And anyway, there is no reason today not to use fully color managed browsers.

  3. Waterproofing is an extra turn to the conversion mentioned above. The point is to limit the range to test the profile, so that you can see this cutting will do to the image. It will documents profile > profile proof > monitor profile. If the profile of evidence has a range equal to or greater than the monitor profile, you will see no difference.

  Important point to keep in mind: If the profile source and destination are the same, no conversion happens and color management is by definition disabled or disabled.

  The first part of the string of audit, document evidence, may be a "convert" or "assignment". Convert maintains appearance, while assign run numbers, but changes its appearance. It's the checkbox 'Keep the numbers' in the proof Setup dialog box.

• After checking-in jpeg images are sometimes different in other programs or online.

  Any ideas how to get the most consistent results would be appreciated.

  If each application and the system of color management properly, it would be possible to obtain a uniform color throughout.

  As it is, this is not the case.

  Many people feel that the publication of an image in sRGB IEC61966 - 2.1 profile is the best approach.  There is debate over whether to publish a profile in the image to identify systems/browsers that have the good color management using this profile - my opinion is that you should do.

  If you have a large monitor range that is not closely emulate the sRGB profile, and assuming that you have calibrated it and profiled, you can see different things when you view an sRGB image using a fully color managed application (for example, Photoshop), a partially (e.g., Internet Explorer) color management application or a color non-managed applications (eg. an older Viewer application).  It is to be expected.

  Different browsers implement different levels of color management.  I mentioned that IE does only half the job - he interprets color of picture profiles, but it assumes that each monitor is sRGB regardless of his profile.  Firefox can do a complete job of color management, including even non graphics web page element color management, but need reconfiguration to do.  Safari only image color, no web page elements.  Last, I looked completely ignored Chrome color management.

  Create your image in sRGB color space, trust what you see on your system that is calibrated and profiled when the image is displayed in Photoshop - that is, make the colors look--here and make your own choice on whether to publish with embedded sRGB profile.  That's the best you can do.

  -Christmas

• Web developers - what is IE9 Exchange balance?

  I was looking on the beta version of Internet Exlporer 9.0 RC.  He is very good looking.

  With this release is expected in the Microsoft browser color management.  After that IE9 is released and is adopted widely, practically all browsers (IE, FireFox, Safari, Chrome) will provide color management.  The balance will be rocked with firmness.

  Good, then maybe IE9 be adopted immediately, but I predict that he may well be adopted pretty quickly.  It seems to work really well, and even in public beta, it is already on a small percentage of computers out there.  And who knows, Microsoft could deploy a Windows Update.

  Another fact is that wide range screens become more frequent.

  What does that mean?

  1. people who have calibrated monitors of wide range and systems (or a profile other than the default sRGB profile specific monitor) will see Adobe RGB and ProPhoto RGB images with more vivid colors that they see in sRGB images.

  2. the images that have already been posted with one color space other than sRGB will become naturally more alive, as their dull, lifeless color will be accurate and they will get more consistent air in virtually all browsers.  Finally.

  As a general rule, if we subscribe to the idea that brighter, more saturated colors get better attention, you could say that post pictures of wide range becomes more attractive in the worlds of navigation of the ubiquitous color management.

  Then... Should we begin publication in wider color gamut spaces?  If not now, when?

  Of course, some people is still running old web browsers.  A small percentage of visitors to my site still run IE6 or older today.  Include IE7 and it goes up to 10%.  But you can not people with money to spend.

  Editing images such as sRGB will probably remain the most consistent way to go for a little more time.  But we are fortunate sRGB looking for the plain, dull and lifeless beside the pictures more colourful on the contest web site.

  Perhaps the trend will be to go to the publication without a color profile.  At first glance, it sounds like a bad idea, but wait: some browsers just put these images on the screen without making any change in color...  IE9 does this and the image uses the full range of all display it is shown on. You might ask: "do look gaudy on a range wide screen?  Of course, but isn't that kind of the goal with advertising?  "Loud, in your face" sells more "accurate".  Use as display of each user as possible.

  But maybe the best way to do it would be to publish the images marked with the widest possible range - ProPhoto RGB.  Surely with proper color management, an image could use all the color range any conceivable monitor could give.  But there could be weirdities with the look of things outside the monitor range.

  Well, Adobe RGB is perhaps good common ground.  Gamut more than sRGB, but not as long as it lays bare the differences between adjacent colors in 8-bit format, and it can carry out almost all the colors that can show modern screens.

  None of this is new.  I just understand with an important entry in the barn of browser managed to color just around the corner, maybe it's the right time to think about it again.

  Your thoughts?

  -Christmas

  It is amazing and very disappointing. Why, Microsoft have same punishment? Ignoring the profile monitor means that IE is still not color managed, simple as that.

  Microsoft is really hitting the brakes here on an evolution that finally seems to have some momentum (not least because of the wide range of monitors). Of course most people never bother to profile their monitors anyway, so nothing new there. But with IE on board, it would have been a massive force in pushing forward, the color management for which would begin to look strangely like a standard.

  Hope just for the secret switch, and that they intend to unveil it in due time.

• LR to PS takes red images

  Hello

  I've scoured the forums and I've seen other similar to mine, but I never find instructions on how to solve the problem.

  My problem: I process my images in LR first, then I want to export to PSCS4 for additional processing.  When I do, the image becomes oversatured and there is a compatible red cast (especially in skin tones) appears so bad particuarly on my monitor range: Lenovo L220x.  I wish that the color was compatible.  I saw messages that say to activate all PS color management policies and I did it and it doesn't work.  I tried to re - calibrate my screen and who does not.  Is there a step by step/flowchart process that me can start from the beginning and work through all the possible problems and solutions.  Any help would be great! Thank you.

  My specs:

  • MacBook Pro
  • 2nd monitor: lenovo x 220
  • i1display2 monitor standard
    

  AHA, it's a known bug in Photoshop CS4. You must disable OpenGL acceleration so he could use the correct profile on a secondary screen. See here for instructions: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/404/kb404898.html

  You can also try to switch off the option "move the color matching.

• Monitor says out of range

  Monitor says out of range. also 91 khz frequency 85 Hz v... need of v to 75 Hz frequency. How can I do this?

  Hello

  Please see your message to http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-performance/hertz-problem/5f02a5c5-b059-e011-8dfc-68b599b31bf5

• Monitors flicker and "Input Signal Out of Range"

  Hello!

  I have a Mac Mini (end 2012) 2.3 GHz Intel core i7 running up-to-date El Capitan, with two HP monitors 2071d.

  These monitors have DVI connections. It is connected with Mini DisplayPort to DVI adapter, and the other with HDMI to DVI adapter (provided with the Mac Mini).

  Everything has been fine for a year until this week. Two monitors are:

  (1) intermitantly began flickering of the scrambled images

  (2) flickering intermittently at black or white noise

  (3) intermittently flickering white noise

  (4) the message of the form 'input out of range Signal. 1600 x 900 at 60 Hz settings."

  How is this problem go and come, but rather continues today.

  After research, I tried to start safe mode, but the problem persists.

  I read that put the computer to sleep and then wake up could solve this problem... it worked a

  couple of times, but the issue soon returned.

  I tried to reset several times VRAM/LANDAU and SMC.

  I doubled checked all the connections.

  Under the system of preferences > display (when the image is stable long enough for me to see) everything looks OK. Under the screen of the 'Default display' tab is selected. On the color tab, there are three HP2071d listed (with a selected) in the window display profiles. I've linked by selecting one of the other "HP2071d" listed without noticeable change.

  I also reset both monitors to factory settings via the menu screen of the monitors.

  I also came across this mini Mac EFI Firmware Update 1.7 for flickering on end of 2012 Mac Minis, but when I tried to run I got "this software don't is not supported on your system. Ugh. It turns out that my Mac Mini is already updated to MM61.0106.B0A (2015-002)

  My Information System > Hardware > graphics/display info is:

  Graphics Intel HD 4000:

  Chipset model: Intel HD Graphics 4000

  Type: GPU

  Bus: integrated

  VRAM (dynamic, Max): 1536 MB

  Seller: Intel (0 x 8086)

  Device ID: 0 x 0166

  Revision ID: 0 x 0009

  Exhibition:

  HP W2071d:

  Resolution: 1600 x 900 at 60 Hz

  Per pixel: 32-bit color (ARGB8888)

  Display serial number: 6CM3171PFF

  Mirror: on

  State of the mirror: mirror material

  Online: Yes

  Rotation: support

  HP W2071d:

  Resolution: 1600 x 900 at 60 Hz

  Per pixel: 32-bit color (ARGB8888)

  Display serial number: 6CM3170P31

  Main screen: Yes

  Mirror: on

  State of the mirror: mirror of Master

  Online: Yes

  Rotation: support

  I am of the ideas of what else to check/try.

  Thanks for any assistance that anyone can provide.

  bdcs64 wrote:

  Hello!

  I have a Mac Mini (end 2012) 2.3 GHz Intel core i7 running up-to-date El Capitan, with two HP monitors 2071d.

  These monitors have DVI connections. It is connected with Mini DisplayPort to DVI adapter, and the other with HDMI to DVI adapter (provided with the Mac Mini).

  Quite the same configuration except here, with 2 Samsung S22B310 DVI monitors on an i5 2.5 GHz in late 2012.

  Everything has been fine for a year until this week. Two monitors are:

  (1) intermitantly began flickering of the scrambled images

  (2) flickering intermittently at black or white noise

  (3) intermittently flickering white noise

  (4) the message of the form 'input out of range Signal. 1600 x 900 at 60 Hz settings."

  How is this problem go and come, but rather continues today.

  Both monitors isn't good. Which would lead us to think that the Intel HD 4000 is overheating and the problem is not with any of the adapters or cables. Although, if one of the cards was not internally, it could put additional heat stress on the graphics chip.

  Personally, I will try a few things.

  1. turn off, unplug everything, open the bottom cover and give it a good cleaning to make sure it cools properly.

  https://www.iFixit.com/device/Mac_Mini_Late_2012

  2. try each monitor individually for awhile configurations see if the problem follows the monitor cable adapter installation.

  (I know he'll be a brake after obtaining used monitors to double)

  3. try using > MacFanControl to monitor and help control the temperature of the GPU ITPP.

  http://www.CrystalIDEA.com/Macs-fan-control

  FWIW, I do not use screensavers, but I do a lot of videos as well as some games of light on both my 2010 and 2012 of the Mini and I really believe that MacFanControl has really helped to extend the life of graphics on these two systems.

  I use the control based on the sensors on the sensor of GPU ITPP and configured so that it starts slowly rise in power of the fan above 129' F

  

• HP 2509 b monitor guard displaying "Input Signal Out of Range" and then go to sleep.

  I went on vacation and shutdown my computer for 2 weeks.  My monitor worked great for a month before.  I came home last night and turned on my system this morning.  Now I get a white message in the middle of the screen with "input out of range Signal. Change the settings for 1920 x 1080 at 60 Hz"and then the screen goes to sleep.  I can turn the monitor off, wait a moment and then turn it back on again, but continues to repeat the same thing.  I checked and the screen is already set to 1920 x 1080 at 60 Hz.  I use VGA and have the default positioned like this.  I followed the guide to troubleshooting online for this error, but it did not help.  Can someone tell me please how to fix this?

  Finally, I got this figured out!  Here's what I did.

  Control Panel

  Display

  Parameters

  Advanced

  Intel(r) Graphics Media Accelerator Driver

  Graphics properties

  Display settings

  Expansion of the display

  Chosen at this stage full screen (no border) instead of "maintain proportions"

  As soon as I put this the error screen disappeared!  Can someone explain to me why this adjustment has been around?  I would like to know.

  Thank you all for your help.

• Monitor displays the error "out of range".

  Some games worked properly in 17-inch monitor, but doesn't work in monitor 15 inch, get the message ' out of range, H-30-60 Khz, V-50-160 Hz. My screen resolution: 1024 x 768 60Hz.The graphics driver is up to date. Is there no way repair it on Control Panel?

  Do a search for config.cfg and autoexec.cfg. They will very probably in the CS, Valve or your user folders for the account name. Rename them to config.cf_ and autoexec.cf_, and then start the game. That resets the audio, video and controller, so you will have to redo. Choose a lower resolution to front for your video, and you should be good to go.
  It was the suggestion that I found for half-life, when a friend had trouble with her years ago (it is also used Valve), so it can work for you, too.

  SC Tom
  -There is no such thing as TMI if you request technical support.