2 common examples of Adobe Media Encoder

Similar Questions

• Adobe Media Encoder not using GPU at all for H.264 encoding

  So I have a strange problem, it seems SOUL refuses to use the GPU for transcoding - I have a minute 9 4 k file I need to transcode and it takes more than an hour on a very fast machine. I tried other formats and files of that specific file and nothing does the GPU at all (using GPU - Z to monitor the load). Specifically trying to get DNxHR or DNxHD files in H.264 VBR 2 pass codec

  Machine: hex 3960K core i7 core cpu - GPU installed: ti 980 GTX / GTX 1080 - 64 GB RAM Win 10 64 pro

  -First pro uses the GPU (actually 1080) for CUDA acceleration video

  -J' tried to disable 1080 GTX in Nvidia with SOUL Panel (setting preference CUDA at 980ti, as I know, pascal is perhaps not compatible yet)

  -J' original CC, no luck tried versions of SOUL

  -J' tried transcoding other types of files in the case where this was a problem of specific file (animation, cineform, etc.) no luck

  My gut tells me it's maybe a CUDA or OpenCL / OpenGL / DLL problem.

  I had CUDA installed 8.0 for use with Octane render, but uninstalled and it makes no difference

  maybe try a CUDA 7.0 installation? that would help? Any other suggestions?

  Hello tstopdigital420,

  Is the GTX 980ti supported for H.264 encoding in Adobe Media Encoder or not? I thought I had read that it was, but maybe I'm wrong. IF not I'll talk accordingly.

  Parenthesis - anyone knows of other software that supports rendering GPU accelerated by CUDA h.264?

  I think you're under the false impression that the GPU speeds up encoding H.264 exports. It does not, but is a feature that is often requested.

  Encoding is a process that focuses on the CPU in Premiere Pro and Adobe Media Encoder. The GPU accelerates certain elements in the entire export process, but not the encoding itself.

  The GPU will accelerate what follows in the export process: scaling, conversion of the image, blending modes, deinterlacing and color space conversion. The GPU will also speed up the processing of GPU based video effects, including the effect of color Lumetri.

  Example:

  • If you are encoding a file of 4K in a file of HEVC H.265 4 K, the GPU acceleration is not involved in the export process because no scaling has been used.
  • If you are encoding a file of 4K in a file, H.264 HD, GPU acceleration is involved in the export process, because the scale was necessary.

  If your GPU is disabled or "grayed out" and he has capable specifications, then this is another problem of troubleshooting.

  Thank you
  Kevin

• Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 slow rendering time

  Hello!

  I'm new to video editing in general, but I'm quite intimate with the PC hardware so here.

  Specifications:

  • The stock of 4770K i7, no thermal regulation speed
  • 8 GB 1600 MHz CL9 DDR3 RAM
  • GTX 780 + 170 MHz clock and 110% limit/95 degrees C temp power target
  • Driver 368.39 used
  • 3 x Samsung 840 EVO (no raid)
    • Windows 10 64-bit running off SSD1
      • PE/AE/SOUL installed on this drive
      • Cache / Scratch areas on this drive
      • Images under development
    • SSD 2
      • Games
    • SSD3
      • Games

  I save images using shadowplay NVIDIA from a 75 Hz screen 2560 x 1080. The output file is a 1920 x 1080 60 fps 35Mbps bitrate H.264 MP4 file. (1920 x 810 with black bars).

  I would add that sequences Adobe Premiere elements 14, do any editing that I have to do, and then export it to a file of bitrate MP4 1080 p H.264 12Mbps. The rendering process usually take around 10-12 minutes to 6 minutes video.

  I then add this file to output in Adobe After effects CC 2015, create a composition with drag and create a button, add a few layers of text and export it via Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 (AE supports native H.264 from what I understand) with the SAME PARAMETERS. But this time, and I estimate that I type here, render times are 40 minutes.

  I ran a few tests and in the course of the first to make the CPU turns to about 80% CPU and the use of 1.8 to 2 GB, as I watch often some youtube in the meantime, so that understandeably not 100%. However, to the course to make AE/SOUL, le CPU CPU remains at about 30% CPU and 1.8 GB ram usage. With the help of the Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (CUDA) I expect to see more high on my GTX 780 loads, but he is 2-3% of load, so anything.

  Since my render outputs are (to the best of my knowledge) identical between the EP and shall return AE/SOUL, it seems that the use of material by SOUL is in this case. Other posters have suggested that some effects require the previous frame to be returned to pass, but I have not used such effects, are limited to simple text.

  So what's happening? I would appreciate any insight you have on this and I stand ready to provide more information that you need.

  Kind regards

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  First of all, wow. Thank you so much for the depth and quality of your response! If everyone had that kind of mentality, forums would be a very different place...

  No problem! That's why I'm here.

  It is certainly useful that you said your question clearly, with a lot of info and he asked respectfully. Quantity of, "why his does not work u should help me solve this NAOW! 1. 1. ' messages with no information is astounding.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  I'll try to be to condense my game data on a single disk or both and use the third exclusively for editing. Or I could buy a new one, if the budget allows.

  This would be ideal. In my freelance studio, I have three separate units

  1. OS/software
  2. Footage
  3. Cache (if there are different types of player, it should be faster than you [I know your are currently all the same, it's more for future fans forum])

  It will probably not help much for the rendering speed, but it should help when you're interacting.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  Before moving on to something else, I want to explain what I'm doing with text. I add text and overlay video, with sometimes a few very basic motion tracking (I can't forget this feature if I need). To the best of my knowledge, PE lets just add a black screen with text over time, like on a Blackboard for example. No text overlays/over-the-video (if it has no meaning...). So respect that, Premiere Pro have these features? If so I could make the switch.

  Certainly, you should stop using the Premiere Elements and start using Premiere Pro. Not only it gives MUCH more flexibility in the work, but you can layer objects of type as much as you want on top of your film.

  He was also transparent enough with AE. By example, if you have a shot that you want to add text, you could cut the part that would have text and simply right-click and choose "replace with After Effects composition. That images will be replaced with a dynamic link to a model of EI that already contains the images that you are handling. You save your AE project and results will be displayed immediately on the first! It's really convenient. If you want to keep this direct link, you can. Or if you are sure you are finished with AE work and wants to read smoothly at first, you can choose to make and replace it. It restores an intermediate file to AE and replaces the model tied first with her. VERY useful feature.

  If you keep track of movement, you probably want to use AE. Although you can make an animation in Premiere Pro, AE is much more suited to do. And if you start to get really fancy, you probably want to do some rotoscoping too.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  I understand that EI requires much more accurately, and the way you explained it enabled me to understand one of the big question I had with her, which was "why reading in real time is so difficult in AE? You answered that perfectly, cheers!

  There is much more detail in the fact that I could get! Basically, AE must first build a cache, and then he reads. Maybe I should have said that. It is even simpler and shorter!

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  On the issue of compression, I realized that the work of a compressed codec is not ideal. My gross output of Shadowplay file was indeed H.264 because I believe that is the single output file, it allows. I don't think I can do without shadowplay for now because it has unique characteristics which cannot be replaced:

  • For extremely low hardware with Nvidia drivers
  • Ability to retroactively save a video after an interesting "keep-worthy" event, to avoid recording 24/7 in the hope of something interesting

  Those who do not sound like some very useful features. Just make sure that you get quality settings in the codec to achieve a data rate as it allows.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  Also, to continue on the issue of compression, I got mixed responses regarding this. Some, like you, would say that working with H.264 sacrifices quality and performance, but some say that it is not a problem since the youtube compression will be severely disfigue the file in any case.

  YouTube can recompress, Yes. But if so, it adds ANOTHER layer of compression. That would be an argument even more important to preserve the quality of your side as much as possible.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  I think my question would be: I would win a much higher quality using Fraps/Dxtory where I can control the settings of the raw images (keeping in mind I lose the comfort of ShadowPlay) even though the compression of Youtube should (I think?) disfigure this film?

  I think that the benefits of ShadowPlay outweigh the concerns that I had about compression in only one step. I still say don't do any other steps in making H.264s again and again that you transmit your project between applications. If you need to make something (you won't have to if you start to use together the Premiere Pro and AE), renders an intermediate codec until you create your deliverable.

  Corentin Robin wrote:

  So, keeping in mind of all of your suggestions and the constraints I have / has chosen to conform to, I should:

  • Have the work files on a separate disk, with areas scratch on this drive or free
  • Replace PE PP to eliminate the need for the AE and have only a single record
  • Since a single rendition is necessary, it is therefore more a real need for an intermediate codec low compression/lossless

  Yes. Although, you can still use AE, you have eliminated the need to make the intermediate files if you use Premiere Pro and AE set.

  In addition the Dynamic Link workflow I mentioned, you can also (once you have finished your editing in Premiere Pro), your Premiere Pro project import into AE. Use import > import Premiere Pro control project. She puts your complete sequence in AE with each cut on its own layer. You really need to do if you started to do really complex with your AE work if.

• Troubled video export - CC animate Adobe and Adobe Media Encoder

  After you have created a simple animation in Adobe animate CC, I want to export to a video file. Given that the export will result in one. MOV file, it requires Quicktime.

  But I get messages from the CC animate and Adobe Media Encoder that the file is unusable, see attached screenshots.

  

  

  

  Is it because that I Don t have Quicktime installed on my computer?

  And one more question: as Microsoft announced that Quicktime player is a risk to security, how can we, who uses a Windows platform, use CC animate it s potential, if Quicktime is required as support software?

  Is it perhaps other ways to convert your animation animate CC for a MP4 or other formats, to breast to animate it CC?

  What other software do I need to convert a video animation file?

  Hardware and software:

  HP laptop

  Microsoft Windows 7 Enterprise

  Intel Core i7 - 4800MQ CPU 2.70 Ghz

  16 GB memory

  How works the video export is incredible. It can control how the code real time based animations are rendered. It is not surprising that he needs QuickTime to render so well. I think that for now you don't have a choice but to install QuickTime.

  The latest QuickTime Player may have security problems may relate more to XP users. The issue in the news was reported in November and January, Apple released version 7.7.9, to deal with the issues who read as they are the same ones. But this version is not compatible with XP.

  As you are on Windows 7, you can install the 7.7.9 version and be pretty up to date with security patches. If new questions rise, and suppose that Apple do not release a patch, make sure just that QuickTime is not configured to be Media Player by default and not go search the web looking for examples of QuickTIme sequences that are on questionable web sites.

  In your Animate/video workflow, you have no reason to open QuickTime Player itself, or to be sequences QuickTime viewing in a browser, so I'm sure that you'll be safe.

  Another tip, the default export quality is average. If you put this line of code in the first frame of the timeline:

  internship. Quality = "best";

  the video quality will be much better. In addition, putting bitmaps to be lossless and allow smoothing. Even if the SWF from the scene becomes too demanding play, the exported video will be perfect.

• direction of Adobe and adobe media encoder cc 2015

  Hello

  When I downloaded adobe direction also adobe media encoder cc 2015 has been downloaded without selecting it. Why?

  also, what is the advantage of the direction of adobe because I do coding for video in direction?

  Thanks in advance

  Adobe media encoder lets you batch encode. For example if you are working on a bunch of projects that can all time several minutes to several hours to encode them set in a queue that the Media Encoder will make all.  Also if you have a big enough computer man you can be coding projects he was working on a new one first.  I use the queue feature a lot since I'm often having to create multiple versions of a project with slight variations. And rather than export, make the changes, export the next, etc. etc., I can just add each variation to the queue and let the process out without waiting to complete. Hope that makes sense.

  He has a bunch of other useful features, but it's the only thing that I really need to.

• Download does not start, Adobe Media Encoder

  I am trying to download the trial version for Adobe Media Encoder.

  Tried IE... Chrome... Firfox. Each each case he says that it is downloaded, however, after several hours nothing.

  I checked the forums. Looks like it is supposed to be a pop-up that allows me to see the progress. I don't get that.

  I encouraged the pop-up windows in the browser (except for Firefox).

  Suggestions?

  Media Encoder more former adobe download through other downloads (for example, flash pro), not in itself.

  more recent soul, Free Media encode CC | Download the free trial version Adobe Media Encoder CC

• are adobe cs6 yet and adobe media encoder cs6 are the same thing?

  are adobe cs6 yet and adobe media encoder cs6 are the same thing?

  # Still is a DVD application.   Adobe Media Encoder is an application for the export of Premiere Pro and After Effects and a desired format transcoding.

  You export using SOUL to mpeg2-DVD and send it to still make a DVD, for example.

• Adobe Media Encoder can be used to do a live broadcast on youtube live?

  Adobe Media Encoder can be used to do a live broadcast on youtube live?

  No, you would need Adobe Flash Live Media Encoder for live streaming purposes - media Encoder, software to capture video, software audio capture. Adobe Flash Media Live Encoder

  You also need a way to get the video signal from the live camera in the computer/encoder software. Could be USB to a webcam, Firewire for older camcorder DV or HD cameras with HDMI output, for example a Desigh BlackMagic or Matrox capture card 'fuel' video Adobe Flash Media Live Encoder.

  GFFE is a FREE download

  Thank you

  Jeff Pulera

  Safe Harbor computers

• Adobe Media Encoder renders in Lossless, such as After Effects?

  Adobe Media Encoder makes Lossless like After Effects too?

  There are several codecs that can encode lossless video. An example is the video codec PNG in a QuickTime container. Another example (which corresponds to the After Effects output module named Lossless) is the video codec of Animation in a QuickTime container.

• Adobe Media Encoder ruins the quality of mi video

  Hello, I have a video motion graphics in After Effects, I turned in png and AE import to add the final touch and when I make ir with SOUL with the 720 p preset Android Tablet and it always make a section specific look terrible pixelated. -Why, I even tried encoding just only PNGs and still it.

  I am tired of this b/c peset I want my file is not to heavy. The Youtube HD 720 preset works great but my file is more than 200 MB.

  How could I make the Tablet Android peset work or get a lower encoded file?

  Thank you

  Could see us a screenshot or a video example to better understand your problem?

  Use the pre-selection Android tablet, but put the maximum bitrate up to 8 and the target up to 4.

  If your AE project is a bit heavy, make an intermediate file (QuickTime with the PNG codec, for example) and then use it in Adobe Media Encoder so you can try different rates of compression parameters and data without having to render it again your full composition of the AE every time.

• Adobe Media Encoder - .wmv not export so much?

  I use Adobe Media Encoder CS6 on a Windows 7 computer.  I visited on a Windows Media (.wmv) format, but it is not found in one of the presets or from the format dropdown.  Only F4V, FLV, H.264, H.264 (inheritance) and MP3 are available.

  I can't find any information indicating that I need to install additional codecs, but I think that's the problem.

  Or maybe it's the version of Creative Suite that does not allow for some file formats?

  Anyone?

  Thank you.

  Hi thanser,

  Adobe Media Encoder has all codecs QuickTime, WMV and others if you have any video application like, Premiere Pro, After Effects or SpeedGrade installed because these are royalty bearing codecs and can be turned on if you have video applications installed and activated with the respective serial. If you have the license for Indesign, Illustrator or Photoshop you might not get these codecs. For example, video applications are provided with the suite Master Collection or Production Premium suite and if you have any what further action you can only use the video as a 30 day trial and get these codecs for a limited time.

  Kind regards

  Vinay

• script: Add to the adobe media encoder

  Hello guys!

  Tout d’abord félicitations les nouveautés et le badass look d’After Effects. I really enjoy!

  But I'm really disappointed to see that the function of rendering h264 has disappeared. Who really destroyed my workflow boom!

  Because I have a lot of jobs for a show room, where I very often do 360 degree projection mappings and the overall resolution there are approximately 26 000 width px. What we do, because we're using watchout as reading system and the management of all the projectors, is splitting h264 movies to their maximum width resolution. The things is that for example for an event we have around 20 to 30 animations and 1 animation is divided into 6 movies... What we did usually - we wrote a little script that automatically splits the film in 6, dial before all, align them all and returns all videos with predefined parameters h264. So... my question is now... How can I modify my script and configure it to send all the comps pre composed, resized, aligned, new to Adobe Media Encoder and use a h264 predefined make the adjustment? I couldn't find any more info on the bridge between AE and Media Encoder script.

  See you soon,.

  Marin

  PS: I know that we can use Final Cut Pro or Motion for resolution of the h264... but it's a kind of workflow I had used to work... everything happens in a single application... and no annoying hundred times save slot, not made in the form etc.

  Hello sailor,

  It is true that it is a pain to manage outside EI h.264 encoding.  You can write a script that calls the app.executeCommand () function and passes the code that calls the "add to Adobe Media Encoder queue... "under menu Composition of AE.  OK, digital, code for this command is 3800.  So you would simply browse the comps you wanted and then open them in the main Viewer using the method. openInView() that brings them into focus for say.  Once it is open you can then send the SOUL model with app.executeCommand (3800).  On the side of the SOUL, you need a default template to render output parameters you want.  When your script adds a model to the queue of the SOUL, it will take these parameters.

  Now, you could do all this, but have you seen AEmpeg than aescripts posted yesterday?  It allows you to 100s of codecs using ffmpeg right of AE.  While it costs money, at least it will open the door to a streamlined workflow and a variety of codecs you might need.

  Arie-

• Download previous versions of Adobe Media Encoder via Creative Cloud?

  Hello

  I recently installed Adobe Media Encoder CC 2014 as part of the Creative Suite, but I would like to use an older version of Media Encoder (for example, 5.5 or 6) that supports export to .flv.

  This is part of my current workflow to get the content in Flash 3D animation (incorporation is the best way for me).

  Your documentation says I can download previous versions of the software, but I can't find where to download a previous version of Media Encoder for the mac platform.

  Can you advise please?

  Thank you

  Derrin

  You must install the first Pro CC, after effects CC, CC Flash or InDesign CC.

  CC of the SOUL (7.x) and earlier versions are only installed and uninstalled by a host application.

  SOUL CC 2014 (8.x) is installed by first Pro CC 2014 and after effects CC 2014, etc, but you can also choose to install or uninstall without install or uninstall other applications. There is a new change for CC 2014 applications, in order to avoid this issue in the future.

• When I add my composition to Adobe Media Encoder from After Effects, it makes it wrong?

  How is it that when I add my composition directly effects to adobe media encoder, it makes out of adobe media encode correctly? I mean, here the video fate a bit scrambled pieces of it overlap other parts. Is this a problem with "dynamic link"? I did something wrong? I work in CC.

  I think you fail to understand what is said. When you add one composition to another, add a composition with a red background for a composition with a blue background, red background goes away and the blue background is preserved, not vice versa. Select the transparency grid and you will see the blue background disappears and you see the transparency. It has always been this way since you were able to select a color background in AE there nearly 20 years.

  When you render a lossless without alpha format and the color is defined prior multiplied (red in your example) background color is multiplied with the alpha pre giving you a red background in your render lossless. If you add your Main Comp to the TEA and you have no option for pre multiply the alpha channel, so it is ignored and you end up with a black background. If you change the output settings in the SOUL to something like JPEG 2000 and 32-bit or 32-bit PNG, you will get a straight alpha channel, the industry standard, and a black background. If you choose a codec which does not support alpha channels, you get just a black background.

  I guess what I'm trying to say is that everything works exactly as it was designed to work, and the only reason why you found the red background of your comps background color when you return a lossless with alpha multiplied pre, is that the background color is meadow multiplied with the bottom. In a normal production pipeline it is assumed you want to preserve the transparency throughout the production process. Multiplying the background color is useful in a scenario very little. More than 40 years the realization of films and creating special effects and composites (yes I did in a lab with the movie) I have never used an alpha pre multiplied with a background colored except in a situation of class in order to demonstrate that it is. Here's how you can see with a multiplied pre alpha is. :

  Rotate your model nested 30º in order to have some aliasing then try rendering your comp with the lossless with alpha preset and keep premultiplied lit for the alpha channel. Look carefully at the embattled edges and you will see a red mixed in on the edges. You can also use the lossless and then restore an alpha only, together the alpha only made as matte to make without loss and you will see the Red edges once again. Use straight alpha and the edges disappear. Here is this that rendered Lossless with alpha and multiplied pre gives you.

  

  So, assuming you still want to maintain complete transparency in the production pipeline that everything works as it should with one exception, the settings default lossless with alpha should probably be for default rendering right alpha then people who are not familiar with the use of alpha channels and a standard production pipeline would not be caught. As I said in the first place, this isn't a bug, it is normal for a production pipeline. Do not understand how AE or any other composition app handles alpha channels, that's what attracted to you. If you want a background color, add a solid. The only reason forever the background color of a black everything except model value is for those rare occasions where you might want to throw some color in the alpha edges.

• Adobe Media Encoder does not start

  No OP, but I have the same problem. SOUL just does not work. Double click it to load, I can see the process in Windows Task Manager, but he goes right again. Tried this .xml file shows the deletion, but does not. Here's my spec in the FAQ:

  • What version of Adobe Media Encoder? Include the minor version number (for example, Adobe Media Encoder CS6 with the 6.0.1 update).
    • SOUL CC from first cc 7.0.1
  • What other Adobe applications you have installed and what application are you using Adobe Media Encoder with?
    • Premiere Pro. Premiere Pro
  • You have installed the latest updates? (If not, you should. They fix a lot of problems).
    • Used the creative cloud to upgrade to the latest version
  • What operating system? This should include specific minor version numbers, like "Mac OS x 10.6.8" - not just "Mac".
    • Windows 7. All update patch installed.
  • Using Adobe Media Encoder via a subscription to creative cloud?
    • Yes
  • What type (s) of the source footage? When talk of your source footage, tell us about the codecs, not only the types of containers. For example, "H.264 in a .mov container,' not just 'QuickTime '.
    • S. o. App launch
  • If you get error messages, what is the integral of the error message text?
    • No error message
  • The problem is only occurring with a specific output format or preset encoding? If so, which? If it's a custom screened not included with SOUL, then download the preset on a file sharing site and provide a link.
    • N °
  • What you were doing when the problem occurred?
    • Start the computer. Launch the SOUL.
  • He has already worked before?
    • Yes.
  • What other software do you use?
    • Google Chrome
  • You have installed third party codecs?
    • Avid DNxHD, Cineform Studio
  • Tell us about your hardware. Make sure especially to talk about I/O of third party material (e.g., AJA, Matrox, Blackmagic or MOTU).
    • Regular desktop
  • Using acceleration GPU of Mercury Playback Engine in Premiere Pro?
    • Yes.

  For those who had the same problem and found this thread:

  I ended up reinstalling everything and it works.

  Uninstall applications CC one by one and then after everything is gone, including the creative application of cloud, run the cc adobe cleaning tool. Then reinstall all.

  Suck Cloud applications