5.2 ACS with authorization SRX GANYMEDE +.

I'm trying to get the job GANYMEDE + on SRX 11.4R7.5. However, during my packet captures on SRX. I found the authorzation SRX with service request = junos-exec but ACS returns no value. causing the SRX to use the 'remote control' as a local user name and take the parameter class to it.

"ACS, I found"Group mapping"policy correspondence to the"default rule"and leave" policy corresponded to the "default rule" as well.

Please help to provide me with a link to the document on how to configure Group mapping and the authorization policy.

You have to push the attributes in the policy elements > custom attributes even as fact here:

https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/3417297#3417297

After that go to the access policies > default device admin > customize > it will open a page customize, in which you choose the types of use of the condition in the policy.

something like AD1: External group and Nas ip address and used to match the authorization rule.

External group: in case you want to check if user on AD should belong to this group.

NAS ip address: go where the Ganymede request here

Jatin kone
-Does the rate of useful messages-

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • ACS with AD-with authentication of twins

    Hi gurus

    I want to integrate my 5.1 ACS with AD, my request is to check first for the machine authentication. If the machine authentication passes the customer name to username/password must be validated and customer should be in VLAN X. If the computer authentication fails, the user/password customer name must be validated. If authentication is successful the customer should be put into VLAN Y

    Let me know if this is possible

    Thank you

    NikhiL

    Nikhil,

    You can set a condition in your authorization policy and check whether the machine authentication has been made and your result out of this basic requirement.

    Here's a guide that corresponds to your questions:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.1/user/guide/users_id_stores.html#wp1235978

    Thank you

    Tarik Admani

  • Integration of ACS with AD

    Hello support,

    I downloaded an ISO image of the ACS and test it on my vmware. I tried to integrate my acs with my active directory which is also inside my vmware.

    I configured the NTP ACS pointing to my AD server server. But the connection failed when I checked the connection between the ACS and my AD server.

    What could be the problem on my installation?

    Kind regards

    mbox23ron

    If your time is synchronized, then the second typical reason for the AD-integration not working is a DNS miscofigured.

    The ACS must use AD - DNS and you should have work the research front and rear.

    Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

  • Specific shell - ACS command authorization / GANYMEDE + on 2900XL

    Hello all-

    I was struggling with a particular issue here. I am running ACS 3.2 and tries to implement secure access to my switch. I have 'students' of my University I want to leave running specific functions, i.e. change the vlan port and write in memory, etc.

    I created with success the piece of the authorization, and my test account can connect. I have successfully assigned a privilege level of 7 also, that gives me a look of default base rights. Accountants strives also, indicating connections and commands me to come home.

    I want to do is use ACS to allow a particular group of controls, so I can change if needed in one place (ACS) and I not touch + 400 devices. ACS says can be done, but it doesn't seem to work. I created a Shell command group and specified commands, no luck. Even if I change the 'unmatched orders' rocking 'allow' (which should allow all orders, right?) it does not yet allow all orders. I added the Shell command group for the group, of which students are members...

    My AAA commands are as follows:

    AAA new-model

    AAA of default login authentication group local Ganymede +.

    Group AAA authorization exec default local Ganymede +.

    AAA authorization commands by default 7 Group Ganymede +.

    AAA accounting exec default start-stop Ganymede group.

    orders accounting AAA 7 by default start-stop Ganymede group.

    orders accounting AAA 15 by default start-stop Ganymede group.

    AAA accounting system default start-stop Ganymede group.

    Any ideas? Any thoughts?

    Thank you!

    Michael

    QU.edu

    Michael,

    You perform permission to order order that exist with a privilege level of 7. By default, the configuration commands have a privilege to 15. There are two ways you can go about solving this problem. The first would be to authorization of installation for level 15 command. The second would be to change the privilege level of the commands that you want your students to be able to run level 15 at level 7. This can be done with the command of privilege. Here is a link that shows the use of the technology locally within the unit. http://www.Cisco.com/warp/public/480/Priv.html

    I don't know if the ACS can push the configuration of the device on a per user basis, so the first option may be your best bet. Be sure to allow access to all controls for yourself.

    Steve

  • 5.2 ACS with Ganymede + can not support switch Alcatel.

    I have a few Alcatel Switch and I want to use tacscs + ACS 5.2 for Alcatel Switch admin authentication.

    the reason: 13011 failure not valid GANYMEDE + query package - possibly mismatched shared Secrets

    But I've been checking the secrecy is correct.

    Before I tried ACS associated with vision 4.2 is working.

    Pls review of attachment for the ACS report.

    Thanks for giving me suggest.

    Hello

    Can't give an you answer, but witch alcatel model/version do you run?

    I have the same problem with OS6250 (6.6.1.636.R01) and acs5.2 unpatched. I'm looking for alcatel or acs bugtrack

    you looked: 144246 PR on:

    http://www.alcadisipsolutions.nl/files/Support_files/Alcatel-Lucent/OmniSwitch/OS6250/Firmware/OS6250%20AOS%206.6.1%20-%206250%20+%206250M%20models/OS6250%20AOS%206.6.1.739%20R01/OS6250%20AOS%206.6.1.739%20R01%20Release%20Notes.pdf

    David

  • ACS command authorization mode t conf report

    Hi, this is probably a quick, but I couldn't find a solution so far.

    We use authorization to order through ACS and are thus able to see (in the case of problems) which concluded the orders at that point on which device. But it doesn't work until someone goes into mode t conf. After that I get log entries in the ACS (Version 5). I can see all the orders and who entered the configuration mode, but nothing after that. Excerpt from the configuration:

    AAA new-model
    connection of AAA 5 authentication attempts
    enable AAA authentication login default group Ganymede + local line
    the AAA authentication enable default group Ganymede + activate
    AAA authorization exec default group Ganymede + local
    AAA authorization commands 1 default group Ganymede + local
    AAA authorization commands 15 default group Ganymede + local
    AAA accounting exec default start-stop Ganymede group.
    orders accounting AAA 1 by default start-stop Ganymede group.
    orders accounting AAA 15 by default start-stop Ganymede group.
    AAA - the id of the joint session

    My guess is that I'm hosting orders with that and so no permission is necessary.

    Any idea?

    Thank you

    Chris

    Hello

    What do you watch? Take a look at RADIUS accounting and authorization Ganymede reports.

    Thank you

    John

  • ACS - ASA authorization and accounting

    Hello

    I have a few questions about the authorization and accounting on the ASA via an ACS server

    1. When I activate the command 'aaa authorization command' users of SSH commands I get locked on console then I have to configure the console, telnet and allow to be authenticated via Ganymede too, is it possible to allow SSH via Ganymede while keeping the Console and telnet authenticated locally or not even no authentication?
    2. I visited command 'aaa accounting TAC' accountant on ASA, but I noticed that GBA records just mod configuration commands ' focus on in 15 "not show all command or privilege 1, is possible to fix this?"»
    3. RADIUS supports authorized SHELL?

    Thank you for your support

    1.] Unfortunately, it is currently not possible to exclude the command authorization serial number / console or ssh to users while having it apply to other methods of access in the case of ASA. Once you run this command, it would be applicable to all methods such as ssh, telnet, http, enable and console. This can be easily achieved by IOS (routers and switches) by creating a list of method.

    2.] when configuring the aaa accounting command , each other than display command command commands entered by an administrator is recorded and sent to accounts or servers. This is a default behavior on the SAA. IOS send/check orders show on ACS/Ganymede.

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa81/command/ref/A1.html

    Kind regards

    Jousset

    The rate of useful messages-

  • Can I use an ACS as RADIUS and GANYMEDE to the same ASA Server?

    I want to GANYMEDE to make the accounting of the SAA, meanwhile, the ASA need RADIUS for authentication ssl vpn. Is it possible to reach this object with only a CSA?

    Yes, you can use both. Allows you to add ASA as radius and Ganymede.

    ACS-->---> aaa-client network configuration

    (1) ASA---> 1.1.1.1---> authentic using Ganymede

    (2) ASA1---> 1.1.1.1---> optout by radius

    Don't forget the host name cannot be the same.

    Kind regards

    ~ JG

    Note the useful messages

  • ACS 5.1 13030 GANYMEDE + authentication error Question

    Hi all

    I am trying to set up a new server GANYMEDE + and am trying to update all configurations of our network to point to the new server devices.  Everything is fine looking up now, but on the ACS monitoring tool, two of our switches are constantly spamming '13030 request authentication GANYMEDE + lack a username' error.  The network admin group have no problem is authenticating with these two switches and they confirm that it is not trying to connect.  Does anyone know if ACS monitor will show any sauce to the IP addresses of these applications?

    If you click on the detail in your authentication error message, you should be able to find the 'Remote-address' field, which should tell you the remote IP address.

    If you haven't seen an IP in the address 'remote' field, you may need to check the console port / switch to see if something is connected to, what could cause the problem.

  • Authentication of ACS with PEAP / MSCHAPv2 - customer rejecting Server

    Hello

    Have a network setup wireless with Cisco 1131AG towers, c6500 WISN module test (4404-WLC) is authenticating with a Cisco ACS appliance (1113) using PEAP and MSCHAPv2 authentication.

    The laptops have the Cisco SSC customer (in collaboration with Mgmt SSC utility).

    A self-signed certificate created on the fate of ACS and root exported and installed on the laptop computer of TCL.

    IF CSSC box 'validation Server' is not selected, the authentication process works and I am able to connect to the network.

    IF CSSC "Validation of server" is checked, the authentication will fail.

    The problem, it appears that the customer refuses the server certificate:

    "Server certificate chain is not valid.

    The GBA, in the 'fail' authentication logs, message the following is stated:

    "Authentication failed during SSL negotiation" (which obvioously refers to the strand of string not valid)

    Any ideas?

    When you create a self-signed certificate, is there a specific directory, when the server certificate must be located? as c:\cert\certificate.cer

    Also, the certificate name must match host name of GBA?

    i.e." CN ="

    Any advice or pointers would be appreciated.

    Thank you

    Questions, it's that when you check the validation of server Box, you must make sure you have the certification authority in the root Certification Authority trusted. For example, in windows, there is a list of servers CA where you check the server certificate validation and also one of the root certification authority is on the list. If the root CA is not listed, then you must add to the list and check it out.

    You are right on the client rejecting the sever cert... Authentication failed during SSL negotiation

    This doc will give you an overview:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_configuration_example09186a0080545a29.shtml

  • Authenticate on ACS with external database

    Hello

    Is it possible to connect to the ACS page with an external database?

    I want to connect to the ACS admin with an external account page.

    Thank you

    Not yet. I also wish that they will apply.

    HTH

  • ACS with ldap Unix

    Hi, I'm in a project security information, and I think ACS software integration with ldap hosts in Unix machine: Samba

    his works?

    Is there a trial version of GBA? any version 4.2, 5.1, etc...

    Thank you

    Try this

    ACS 4.2

    http://www.Cisco.com/cgi-bin/software/tablebuild/doftp.pl?ftpfile=Cisco/crypto/3DES/ciscosecure/ACS/win/90-dayeval/eval-ACS-4.2.0.124-SW.zip&app=tablebuild&status=showC2A%3E

    ACS 4.1

    http://www.Cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ACS-win-eval

    ACS 5.1

    https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/2024417

  • 5.2 ACS with different RADIUS authentication servers

    Hello

    I want to migrate from ACS ACS 5.2 4.1. I have already configured authentication GANYMEDE +, but now I've stuck to the RADIUS authentication for remote access WebVPN configuration. Please see the following diagram:

    I want to configure ACS to use Server Token WBS first. If authentication fails or the user is not found, ACS must use IAS in Windows Server. If this server fails also ACS must use internal DB. Additional attributes as belonging to a group or ACL downloadable should be taken from internal ACS DB.

    Is it possible to configure ACS like that? ACS 4.1 it is very easy to configure by selecting the per user authentication method.

    Thanks for your help!

    There is an option in the Advanced tab of definition 'RADIUS Identity server' th:

    This storage of identity differentiates between 'authentication failed' and 'user not found' when an authentication attempt is rejected. Among the options below, select how a rejection of authentication of the identity store must be interpreted by FAC for the politics of identity of treatment and reports.
    Releases to treat as 'authentication failed' treat dismisses them as "user not found".

    In order to continue in the sequence, I think you have to select the option "user not found".

  • Cisco ACS with external DB - EAP - TLS

    Hi guys,.

    I understand how the EAP - TLS exchange works (I think), but if I have a client (with or without wire) that uses EAP - TLS with a CBS, I confirm the following.

    Let both users and computer certificates are used:

    1. customer and ACS are with each of the other automatic certificates to ensure they are known to each other. The eap - tls Exchange.

    2A. At any given time and I'm assuming until the successful eap - tls message is sent to the client, the ACS to check if the user name or computer name is in the AD database?

    2B. Wot is the parameter that is checked on the AD database?

    I read here that it can be: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_server_for_windows/4.1/configuration/guide/peap_tls.html#wp999517

    Client certificates

    The client certificates are used to identify with certainty the user in EAP - TLS. They have no role in the construction of the TLS tunnel and are not used for encryption. A positive identification is made by one of three ways:

    CN (or name) comparison-compare CN in the certificate with the user name in the database. More information on this type of comparison is included in the description of the subject field of the certificate.

    Comparison of SAN-compare the San in the certificate with the user name in the database. It is only supported from the ACS 3.2. More information on this type of comparison is included in the description of the field another name of the subject of the certificate.

    Binary comparison - compare the certificate with a binary copy of the certificate stored in the database (only AD and LDAP for that). If you use the binary comparison of certificate, you must store the user certificate in a binary format. Also, for the generic LDAP and Active Directory, the attribute that stores the certificate must be the standard LDAP attribute named "usercertificate".

    3. with the foregoing, if options 1 or 2 are used (CN or SAN comparison), I guess it's just a check between a value out the CERT of the ACS and checked with AD, is that correct? With option 3, GBA exercise a complete comparison of the certificate between what the client and a "cert stored client" on the AD DB?

    Please can someone help me with these points.

    I'm so lost in this kind of things :)) I think.

    Thx a lot and best regards,

    Ken

    TLS only * handle * is complete/successful, but because the user authentication fails.

    CryptoLib.SSLConnection.pvServerInfoCB - process of TLS data: State = SSLv3 client SSL read Exchange of keys A

    CryptoLib.SSLConnection.pvServerInfoCB - process of TLS data: State = SSLv3 read Certificate SSL check

    CryptoLib.SSLConnection.pvServerInfoCB - process of TLS data: SSL = SSLv3 read state completed A

    CryptoLib.SSLConnection.pvServerInfoCB - process of TLS data: State = SSLv3 write change cipher spec A SSL

    CryptoLib.SSLConnection.pvServerInfoCB - process of TLS data: SSL = SSLv3 write finished State has

    CryptoLib.SSLConnection.pvServerInfoCB - process of TLS data: State = SSLv3 data embedded SSL

    CryptoLib.SSLConnection.pvServerInfoCB - process of TLS data: State SSL = SSL handshake completed successfully

    EAP: EAP - TLS: handshake succeeded

    EAP: EAP - TLS: authenticated handshake

    EAP: EAP - TLS: CN using the certificate as an authentication identity

    EAP: State EAP: action = authenticate, username = 'Jousset', the user identity is "jousset.

    pvAuthenticateUser: authenticate "jousset" against CSDB

    pvCopySession: assignment session group ID 0.

    pvCheckUnknownUserPolicy: Group of session ID is 0, the call pvAuthenticateUser.

    pvAuthenticateUser: authenticate "jousset' against the Windows database

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: Cache of Creating Domain

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: Domain for loading Cache

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: no UPN Suffixes found

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: could not get the domain controller for dwacs.com trust, [error = 1355]

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: could not get the domain controller for enigma.com trust, [error = 1355]

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: could not get the domain controller for acsteam.com trust, [error = 1355]

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: could not get the domain controller for vikram.com trust, [error = 1355]

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: domain loaded cache

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: could not find the user jousset [0 x 00005012]

    External DB [NTAuthenDLL.dll]: user Jousset is not found

    pvCheckUnknownUserPolicy: assignment session group ID 0.

    Unknown user "jousset" was not authenticated

    If EAP-failure (RADIUS Access-Reject (is sent, no EAP-Success(Radius Access-Accept).))

    And no matter how port will not be allowed to pass traffic unless the NAS device gets an EAP-Success(Radius Accept) for the user.

    HTH

    Kind regards

    Prem

  • 5.2 ACS with more than one IP address

    Hello

    My question is simple, but yet I can't find a document that meets. I want to install an ACS 5.2, and the customer wants to have a separate management interface. The 1121 device has 4 network cards and got the label of Mgmt on this subject. However, when I try to set a second interface, it is said that only a single IP address must be configured.

    Can someone point me to a document where it is said, so I can go back to the customer with a backup solution with a document?

    Thanks in advance.

    Javier

    I can share that this capability will be supported in version 5.4 of the CSA which will be available in a few months

Maybe you are looking for