550 mailsize Max on

Similar Questions

• Pavilion 550 153na: R5 330 Max Graphics resolution

  What is the max resolutions 60 fps and 30 FPS available of 550 153 graphics edge r5 330?

  Is the HDMI 1.4 or 2.0?

  In my case, it will be used for video, but no games.

  Hi @Malc_Edwd, thanks for the reply.

  According to the characteristics of the graphics card, 4096 x 2160 is the maximum display resolution supported when you extend or replicate them to an external monitor or TV.

  It does not just playing games.

  I stand to be corrected the previous link I sent was for Mobile M330 graphics card, however you can refer to the link below for the graphic specifications R5 330.

  Link:http://hp.care/2dmU1RF

  Using the link that you may know well can run a game on your PC.

  Just mention details such as the type of CPU, memory and the name of the game it will tell you all the details.

  Let me know if it helps!

  Have a great day!

• Upgrade of RAM 550 d-105 NB

  Hello

  I have a Toshiba NB 550 d-105 netbook, and I want to upgrade the ram in it. I read that the restriction of 2 GB ram is only because of Windows Starter.

  Processor AMD C-50 supports 4 GB of RAM? If so, does that mean I close no start and change of normal Windows 32-bit OS or 64-bit?

  > I read ram 2 GB restriction is only because of Windows Starter

  Upgrade RAM depends on the chipset.
  Also 32 bits of the system supports max 3.2 GB of RAM if you want to use more RAM 4 GB, 8 GB, etc. then you must use a 64-bit system.

  Regarding the NB550D-105:
  As far as I know the 1 GB or 2 GB RAM (DDR3 1066 Mhz or 1333 Mhz) memory sticks can be installed.
  Some models could handle 1 GB or 2 GB modules (DDR2-800 and DDR3-1066 or 1333 Mhz DDR3)

• Desktop HP Pav 550-040: memory

  Hello all;

  You are always useful - I have a question. I have a desktop computer Pavilion (HP Pavilion Desktop 550-040), which holds a cap of 16 GB of memory. It has now already 8 is installed and I bought on Ebay what follows below - which is an additional 8 to max out.

  Crucial 8 GB DDR3 1600 MHz PC3 - 12800 CL11 240pin Non ECC funds RAM UDIMM memory

  (281510399272)

  It's a real GOOD to KNOW! Thank you Dean. Perhaps this is why the blue screen of death. Although it allowed the basis on the ram, he did not so the BSOD. I will answer the partner of Ebay with your answer - that can help the exchange for correct RAM.

  Thank you very much.

  best,

  John

• Upgrade memory for Tecra CDT 550

  I have a toshiba tecra 550 CDT laptop with 64 MB of RAM.

  I want to migrate the RAM.

  Memory expansions I could install and what is the maximum size of the memory?

  Thanks for any help.
  Jochen

  Hello

  Well, as I know you can upgrade memory for max 160 MB.
  I found information on this module and it is compatible with your laptop:

  16 MB RAM Part number: PA2039U
  32 MB RAM Part number: PA2043U
  64 MB RAM Part number: PA2044U
  128 MB RAM Part number: PA2054U

  Good bye

• Field of amount but the MAX primary key

  Hello

  Is it possible to summarize a table and display the maximum value of the primary key?  The works of sum(), but I still would like to show one of the primary keys.  The maximum primary key would be great show records that were actually summed.

  CREATE TABLE TBL_EMP

  (

  NUMBER OF PK_EMP

  SITE_ID NUMBER,

  NUMBER OF FUNDS

  )

  -5 RECORDS

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (1, 500,10);

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (2, 550,20);

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (3, 600,30);

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (4, 650,40);

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (5, 650,50);

  	SELECT PK_EMP,
  	SITE_ID,
  	FUND
  	OF TBL_EMP

  ORDER BY SITE_ID

  -Results

  PK_EMP	SITE_ID	FUND
  1	500	10
  2	550	20
  3	600	30
  4	650	40
  5	650	50

  	SELECT - PK_EMP,.
  	SITE_ID,
  	SUM (FUND) AS FUND
  	OF TBL_EMP
  	SITE_ID GROUP

  ORDER BY SITE_ID

  -Results

  SITE_ID	FUND
  500	10
  550	20
  600	30
  650	90

  -If possible show the Max primary key

  PK_EMP	SITE_ID	FUND
  1	500	10
  2	550	20
  3	600	30
  5	650	90

  Hello

  Nikki wrote:

  Hello

  Is it possible to summarize a table and display the maximum value of the primary key?  The works of sum(), but I still would like to show one of the primary keys.  The maximum primary key would be great show records that were actually summed.

  CREATE TABLE TBL_EMP

  (

  NUMBER OF PK_EMP

  SITE_ID NUMBER,

  NUMBER OF FUNDS

  )

  -5 RECORDS

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (1, 500,10);

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (2, 550,20);

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (3, 600,30);

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (4, 650,40);

  INSERT INTO TBL_EMP VALUES (5, 650,50);

  	SELECT PK_EMP,
  	SITE_ID,
  	FUND
  	OF TBL_EMP

  ORDER BY SITE_ID

  -Results

  PK_EMP	SITE_ID	FUND
  1	500	10
  2	550	20
  3	600	30
  4	650	40
  5	650	50

  	SELECT - PK_EMP,.
  	SITE_ID,
  	SUM (FUND) AS FUND
  	OF TBL_EMP
  	SITE_ID GROUP

  ORDER BY SITE_ID

  -Results

  SITE_ID	FUND
  500	10
  550	20
  600	30
  650	90

  -If possible show the Max primary key

  PK_EMP	SITE_ID	FUND
  1	500	10
  2	550	20
  3	600	30
  5	650	90

  Use the aggregate function MAX, in the same way that you already use the SUM aggregate function:

  SELECT MAX (PK_EMP) AS max_pk_emp,

  SITE_ID,

  SUM (FUND) AS total_fund

  OF TBL_EMP

  SITE_ID GROUP

  ORDER BY SITE_ID

  ;

• GPU upgrade 2 GB Evga GTX 550 Ti suggestions?

  I am looking to upgrade to a 970 GTX Gigabyte G1 Gaming or an EVGA if I'm looking at other brands as well.

  Budget around $350.00 USD.

  I'm still doing research and research with options open but I'm really more leaning to the Nvidia 970.

  My CPU is limiting the PCI-E x 16 running at 2.0 speeds, but even with that, I think that the 970 would be

  the best choice in the GPU upgrade.  Thoughts or alternatives?  You want something that works long term and not just

  buy something cheap, until the next thing comes.

  I'm NOT a gamer I mainly webdesign so a lot of image, video and audio editing. I'm more a combination

  between an advertising marketing exec and a web developer with programming in PHP, JavaScript and all back-end

  stuff with databases and also web video and audio stuff etc... I just combine it all in the title of Web Designer for the conversation

  who actually confuses real webdesigners because I build a LOT more than just html and css pages.

  It is a type of prosumer system where it is used for work and entertainment. Watching movies and streaming video

  This works well on the current computer and I actually don't really need more of an upgrade beyond the GPU as this computer

  It meets my needs and has 2 years.  I expect to keep for a few years, I have built computers that will last

  me 3 to 5 years, will eventually build a new, but for now everything works great.

  I honestly don't care about having the biggest and best just something that will work for more than a year or two and meet my needs.

  But it seems that the GPU tech is going through a revolution where the old technology begins to be depreciated and will not be taken in charge a large part

  in the future I am looking to get a new video card might as well go with the new stuff now so it will be supported in the long term

  everyone at some point.

  I'm just confused by models and manufacturers or resellers who slap their label on Nvidia technology.  Who is the best with little no.

  problems.  EVGA seems to be popular, it's my current card brand, but I like the Gigabyte G1 with additional display ports and

  possibility of having 4 monitors at the same time IF it can be inserted into my system, it's HUGE.

  -------------------------

  Hardware specifications:

  PSU: VisionTek 800W < == will be upgrade to a 750 or 850-Watt Seasonic, Antec or Evga also.

  Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV ver 2.0

  CPU: Intel CPU i7-2600 @ 3.40 GHz Stock using stock intel cooler fan

  HD: 3 x - 1 to disk WD Blue and two black discs

  Memory: 16 GB Ram 2 x - 8 GB memory-crucial

  The blue drive is the system drive to the approximately 700 GB of the disk format and divided in two with

  Windows 7 64 bit Pro and 8.1 of Windows in dual boot.  No SSD not because of the MOBO only being 3 GB and not 6.

  It was custom built by a store of the local computer that is off from where go out of business.

  The upgrade of processor or motherboard is NOT an option that some purchased software is old school licensed

  with attached directly to the CPU and the MOBO that cost more than the entire computer to buy

  licenses (not associated with Adobe Professional software).  In addition the upgrade MOBO or CPU, you are required to

  Microsoft to buy a new license for windows and windows 7 can probably just reactivated windows 8 can not.

  This motherboard is a motherboard micro, I didn't know that until recently. I did not build the computer myself.

  I had no idea of what food was until a few days ago, but everything worked 100% for about 2 years.

  I'll have to update the bios of the motherboard before actually being able to use the new video card, but others have the same model

  and it seems to work as well... I have a request to Gigabyte but just to check before actually buying.

  Remember though it is a Ti 550 video card I currently have and almost any update would see great improvement.

  Physical size wise how much greater is the 970 compared to 550 it 2 GB Evga gtx?   I add 2 GB because it

  are other 550 which are totally different aspect that my card.

  Also if you have any suggestions for the PSU that would be much too.   So far Seasonic, Antec and EVGA are brands that seem to

  forthcoming models much earlier.  Not sure about the rating as some out Bronze models perform other models gold or Platinum so...

  Budget about $150.00 USD for a new power supply too.

  Thanks for reading this and for any suggestion, sorry that I can't upgrade mobo or cpu to be able to run amok with ideas, it is some what may be limiting.

  Essentially, it's the GPU and PSU will extend my current level of use of a few years and the GPU has better performance even with

  the other tech and bottlenecks in this particular system.

  Like Bob of the Peru said. The money you would have spent on a GTX 970 would have been much larger than any improvement in performance that you could achieve (on a systemic basis, not only a specific component). In fact, the cost of a single GTX 970 would have been almost as much money as the rest of your entire system combined - and yet, the upgrade provides more than an improvement of 5 to 10 percent in terms of total return.

  Very recently, I upgraded an i7 - 3770K and Z77 to an i7 - 4790K and Z97. Mainly because I wanted to spend my project/player and cache drive to SSD (s) in the not too distant future. (The Z77 supports two SATA 6.0 Gbps ports and 4 SATA ports 3.0 Gbps in native mode, which is the impetus for this upgrade). But in order to take account of the upgrade of the CPU, I had to get off my GPU slightly to a 660 GTX for a GTX 750 Ti (for my particular workflow, GTX 750 it performed almost as well as the GPU high-end in terms of overall performance of the system).

  That said, there are reasons to move a GPU for a GPU to budget (or even ultra-low-budget, for that matter) to a 'Warrior' or the 'monster' GPU. But improving rendering performance on such a limited as LGA 1155 Sandy Bridge platform is not one of them. And a GPU upgrade is valid IMHO only if the rest of the construction of PC is to speed - with a much higher total system start-up costs.

  Moreover, a single 1 TB WD black or blue (versions WD10EZEX and WD1003FZEX, respectively) may not achieve the best 180 - ish MB/sec - and it's on the outside tracks of his tray. A HDD WD four-year-old (Blue WD10EALS or Black WD1002FAEX) at 7200 RPM have barely hit 125 MB/s on the outside rails. As such, with disks one alone, I agree with the other responses: remember to save it upward to an i7-4790 a W97 chipsets motherboard instead of lose a single penny on this generation i7-2600/H61 (your current system, by the way, is completely maxed out on RAM to only 16 GB total - and you can not pass the RAM any more far away).

  In other words, your current PC is, indeed, obsolete (as in "cancelled" or 'is there something better now in this category', not ' is no longer useful or usable").

• MacBook Pro (15 inch, end 2013) with MacOS Sierra 10.12: kernel_task maxing out CPU with external display

  I have a maxed out end 2013 the MacBook Pro Core i7 to 2.6 GHz, 16 GB of DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce GT 750 M 2048 MB, Intel Iris Pro 1536 MB.

  Also, I have a DELL P2415Q Display 24 inches (3840 x 2160) using Thunderbolt, are involved through the headphone jack and use a USB for lightning to recharge my iPhone.

  I upgraded to macOS Sierra the day he is released and had no problems until this morning. I unplugged my external screen and speakers and used my laptop for about 15 minutes, the battery, and then returned to my office and plugged my Thunderbolt, rear speakers display in and my CPU shot at 100% and never came back down. My Mac is essentially useless because kernel_task is eating all my CPU and to prevent another asks to enter the CPU.

  I have since audited equipment - everything was fine, reset the NVRAM and I tried to erase IOPlatformPluginFamily.kext .plist files but I couldn't on my Mac (trying to follow this guide, started in Safe Mode and everything then went to try and find the file and my Mac just does not have it). When my external screen is plugged if I'm doing anything CPU intensive (videophone, opening of Chrome, etc.) then my kernel_task gets mad again, and the only way to move is to unplug my screen. Connect my iPhone to charge the tips also my kernel_task as well. I followed my internal temperatures, and nothing was out of the ordinary, to cold currently at about 140 °.

  At this point, it seems that any time that puts something on the charging system and increase the temperature internal internal components of my Mac kernel_task maxes my CPU, which brings my Mac to its knees.

  Any ideas how to fix? Is this just a major bug in 10.12?

  Hi, Trent L.

  Try this - problems with macOS Sierra? This fix can help you.

  He got rid of all my macOS strangeness of the Sierra.

  Hope this helps,

  -BrainSel

• Time series: finding max and min for each month

  Hello world. I'm working on a datasheet that has collected the data points for all day for the past 15 years.

  A column stores the date and column B contains a numeric value.

  I want to do the following:

  Create a new table (call it table #2) that:

  (1) is now a time series on a monthly basis (column A contains "year month"). This is why the table contains a header and 15 * 12 = 60 rows of data

  (2) B Col contains the Max value of this month.

  (3) C Col contains the value this month min

  Table #2 should be calculated automatically because I need to find these values for several series. Any ideas?

  Here is a way that I came up with

  

  In the table above, your original data is in columns B and C.

  I've added three additional columns (A, D and E):

  D2 = Year (B2) & NUMTOBASE (MONTH (B2), 10, 2)

  It's shorthand dethrone select D2, and type (or copy and paste it here) the formula:

  = Year (B2) & NUMTOBASE (MONTH (B2), 10, 2)

  E2 = IF (D1≠D2, 0, E1 + 1).

  Select copy of D2 to E2,

  Select cells D2 at the end of column E, block

  A2 = D2 & NUMTOBASE (E2, 10, 2)

  Select A2, copy

  Select A2 at the end of the A2 column, paste

  now create a second table summary as shown:

  

  For 'Summary Table 2016:

  the first four lines are the lines of header

  There are 35 total lines

  Enter the year in cell B1

  A5 = −4 LINE)

  B5 = SIERREUR (VLOOKUP ($B$ 1 & NUMTOBASE(B$4,10,2) & NUMTOBASE($A5,10,2), data: $A:$ C, 3, 0), "")

  Select cell B5, copy

  Select cells B5 at the end of row 5, dough

  Select A5 thru M5, copy

  Select cell A5 at the end of the M column, paste

  B2 = MIN (B)

  B3 = MAX (B)

  Select the cells B2 to B2, copy

  Select the cells B2 through M3, dough

  now duplicate the table and change the year to 2015 for the next year.

  You can duplicate this table as necessary to summarize a year

• power max

  Hello

  No one knows what is the max power by:

  1. a core of mac pro 8 (early 2008) when working at full capacity? That is to say all 4 disks + gf 8000 gt graphics card

  2. Ditto for iMac 21.5 inch clocked at 1.6 Ghz dual core i5, intel graphics hd 6000

  3 and 2.8 Ghz quad core intel i5, iris intel graphics pro 6200

  I need to buy a UPS and need to have this info. Surprisingly enough support tech didn't have this info.

  Thank you

  A standard from the factory Mac Pro (or other model) would have a use power max figure that could be given, but as soon as the user make a change for example, adding a hard drive additional or larger, this figure will change.

  It doesn't help much, but here's the official specs for your model of Mac Pro

  Electrical and environmental requirements

  • ENERGY STAR configurations suffisantes6
  • Voltage: 100-120 v AC or 200-240 VAC (input voltage range)
  • Frequency: 50 Hz to 60 Hz single-phase
  • Current: Maximum of 12A (range low voltage) or 6a (range high voltage)

  For what its worth that classic Mac Pro models have a 980 watt power meaning that is the absolute maximum, he can deliver if fully loaded.

  If you want specific numbers depending on your configuration and use then the best option is to get a socket which allows to measure actual usage. Some examples of such devices.

  https://www.Amazon.com/P3-international-P4460-electricity-monitor/DP/B000RGF29Q/

  http://www.Belkin.com/us/F7C029-Belkin/p/P-F7C029/

• Export of difference JPG high or Max JPG?

  I noticed, as others before me, that quality JPG exported files are much smaller than the MAX quality JPG files exported. Can someone explain the differences? I did some tests and to the naked eye (mine) images do not look so different on the screen (retina). But MAX exports are often almost twice as HIGH exports.

  What is happening with this?

  Obviously, the difference will be apparent at higher magnifications.

  All that is good enough for your export venture, but maintain the original file at its original resolution. You never know what you might need in the future quality.

• How to find a mini/MAXI according to specific criteria

  I need to find the low/over highest number in a given list, but according to a variable. For example:

  

  How removed many/most cars sold to someone in the role of sales? Just the number here.

  * Bonus: in a separate cell, generate the name of the sales person that has the most sold cars.

  MacBook Pro 15 retina

  El Capitan

  3.6.2 numbers

  Thanks for the help.

  Maybe it will work for you:

  

  Make sure that the first line is a header

  Add additional columns as illustrated titled "sales", "Finance" and "Manager".

  D2 = IF ($B2 = D$ 1, $C2, "")

  It's shorthand dethrone select cell D2 and type (or copy and paste it here) the formula:

  = IF($B2=D$1,$C2, "")

  Select cell D2, copy

  Select cells D2 the F6, paste

  now created the table of Stats as shown, with the first row, a header row

  B2 = if (counta (a2) > 0, MAX (OFFSET (table 3: $D$ 1, 0, MATCH ($A2, table $1 3::D: F$ 1.0) −1, LINES (table 3::D), 1)), "")

  C2 = if (counta (a2), OFFSET (table 3: $A$ 1, MATCH (B2, OFFSET (table 3: $D$ 1, 0, MATCH ($A2, table $1 3::D: F$ 1.0) −1, LINES (table 3::D), 1), 0) −1, 0), "")

  Select the cells B2 C2, copy

  Select the cells B2 at the end of the C column, paste

• Images are the scale is no longer with (img {max-width: 100% ;}) css from the 34.0.5 in firefox update, it still works fine in IE and chrome.})

  My site was working fine up until firefox updated 34.0.5. Now the images will not scale to fit the box more. I use flexbox so that the site is changing to adapt to the size of the browser. In css, I set img {max-width: 100% ;} and this would make the jpg file size automatically to fit the area they were in, but no more than Mozilla really screwed up this with updated 34.0.5.} My site still works fine with IE and Chrome, but 70% of my web traffic using firefox so I would really like this to work in firefox.
  Any help is greatly appreciated!

  I work by setting a special parameter in CSS for the images that I needed to scale and then I have it referenced by SPAN for each img in HTML, not quite how I wanted it to work since now images filling the box even with monitors really big format, which means that they could now be blurred on a 4 k monitor but firefox left me no choice. Looks like I have going to aid in future chrome like firefox really shit the bed on this 34.0.5 updated

• Problems with the new Macbook pro 15' maxed out

  Here's a quick post about my experience so far with the new macbook pro. I just got a brand new fully maxed out in spec macbook pro 15 inch 1 to SSD 16 GB RAM AMD R9 370 m GPU (set to automatic switching is not always) and a 2.8 to 4 GHz i7. I turned on and set it up which was nice and took 2 minutes. Then experience decreased a little when I saw an EST 05:36 hours of battery life remaining to 94%. So I loaded 100% and it is still 60% of battery life announced and no program running that I literally just signed a brand new machine.

  Then I tried to use the migration wizard to import a backup of my iMac 5 k so I can do everything on this clone for my laptop. After having successfully connected (he told me if my password for time machine was incorrect or not) it froze and did nothing, continue did nothing.

  Then place had to call support, was a guy on the phone in 30 seconds and I unplug and restart the machine time, always that same question so I transferred to a guy with "more training". The new guy I could say knew a little more and knew that I knew how to set my password or if I walked in their properly for a bit but they all have been set for the same password just for this. I created a second admin account called "test" under his leadership, and when the migration assist froze on this account, he was surprised and proceeded to transfer me off.

  I preceded to restore fully the machine into thinking that my account setup is causing trouble with the migration assistant, and it turns out that the closure of that laptop it can only continue to 'download additional components', while that connected for 30 minutes so all last night was wasted, and now I guess he's got 5 left 12 hours to download original 'things '. Keep in mind that I can download 5 GB in one hour... After he wake up this morning and ending up where I left it last night :/ he says 84 hours go, now 72 and 51 and it is not updated even once in seconds, it took 20 minutes to 84 minutes to 51, it's literally a day 2 reset extravagance or what? Just to download it I can only imagine the actual plant until I can install my programs.

  The cost of the laptop was about $3600 but paid ~ $2900 after headphones were included and $250 off for delivery to students and other issues on the agenda of the process itself that is not my complaint, what happens, but sitting with a new camera and support useless just to ask me if I can use actually tomorrow at this price are unacceptable.

  I would like to continue using it for a while.

  You can try to reset the SMC http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3964

• I have version 29.0.1 and frequently the top right three boxes (min, max, quit) are missing. How should I do?

  Since the installation of version 29, I had this problem where the three boxes are missing. It happens sometimes that I start FireFox. I can right-click in the min, max or closing of FireFox and area. I never had the problem before. I have an i7 processor and on Windows 7.

  The boxes are not visible (i.e., they show a ToolTip if you hover and work if the click in this area) or whatever should not happen at all?

  You can check the problems caused by a corrupt localstore.rdf file.

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Corrupt_localstore.RDF

  You can check for problems with preferences.

  Delete a possible user.js file and files numbered prefs-# .js and rename (or delete) the file prefs.js to reset all the prefs by default, including the prefs set via user.js and pref which is no longer supported in the current version of Firefox.

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Preferences_not_saved
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Resetting_preferences