6.2.1 Scheduler security

Similar Questions

• Prevent other users to access my result of report of process scheduler

  I use a work (containing 1 SQR program) you use recurring to run every day at 01:00.
  
  What device is best to use to restrict users to take actions like (STOP or HOLD or CANCEL) that can affect my process waited for pace at 01:00 the next day?
  And how to configure to allow the latter ONLY and user_B to see my report? The rest should not see.
  
  Thank you

  The place to define what output users can see is defined in the process profile in the group box allows to process request
  See
  PeopleBooks > PeopleTools 8.52: PeopleSoft process scheduler > Annex: implementation of PeopleSoft process Scheduler security

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E28394_01/pt852pbh1/Eng/psbooks/TPRs/IMG/sm_SecurityProcessProfilePermissionPage7a91_tprs7f4b.PNG

  + This section allows you to adjust the level of access rights with other users to view and update process queries that are started by users in a specific profile. Display and update rights can be changed of owner, all, or none. The default value allows process asks to be read by all and updated only by the owner. If you view by owner, no one else can view the status of the process in process monitor. Make the necessary changes to user rights. +

  I hope this helps.

  Halin

• OBIEE 11 g Service Active Directory presentation recovery user error

  Hi team,
  
  It's a great help to all of you on learning OBIEE.
  
  I recently configured Microsoft AD on Weblogic rather than SPR. But felt like I'm in a desert of helplessness because of the long and complicated documents and settings :(
  
  Even when I have everything configured and connected to the presentation using AD Credentials services, observed following error message!
  
  Error during extraction of data from the API of Population user of the Oracle BI Server user/group.
  Error details
  Error codes: GDU6UYHS:OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P:SDKE4UTF
  ODBC driver returned an error (SQLExecDirectW).
  State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error occurred. [nQSError: 43113] The message returned by OBIS. [nQSError: 13049] The 'gp06108' user with ' oracle.bi.publisher.scheduleReport; AtAGlance; oracle.bi.publisher.accessReportOutput; _all_; oracle.bi.publisher.accessExcelReportAnalyzer; _all_; oracle.epm.financialreporting.accessReporting; Explores; Oracle. BI. Publisher.accessOnlineReportAnalyzer; EPM_Essbase_Filter; Oracle. BI. Publisher.runReportOnline; Oracle. As.Scheduler.Security.MetadataPermission ' authorisation may not question the user population. Please ask your system administrator check the newspaper for more details on this error. (HY000)
  Please ask your system administrator check the newspaper for more details on this error.
  Expression: privileges ['Admin: catalog '] ['edit permissions']
  
  Total blockout! Everyone faces this problem earlier

  You need a username to be present in your Active Directory DN of Base that will be used as the BISystemUser. You will need to create this user in AD or use an existing AD user and then specify its letters of nobility in Enterprise Manager (expand Weblogic domain > bifoundation_domain (right click) > Security > Credentials). You need to set the system.user under oracle.bi.system card credentials. Make sure your ad password never expires or you will encounter problems in a few weeks!

  Paul

• Essentials of security will run a scheduled scan of the entire system on a computer running Win. XP hibernation

  Essentials of security will run a scheduled scan of the entire system on a computer running windows XP Hibernate

  No scanning is performed in hibernation, standby, sleep, or else that the system is powered off.  You must plan the scan for a time when the PC is running.  MIDI works fine for me.

• No mapping between account names and security IDS made mistake by attempting to use the Task Scheduler

  I have noticed that my msfeedssync.exe were not working or updated so I went to the Task Scheduler to see what was going on and received the number above mapping between user names and security ID error I never use Task Scheduler, but I do not know its also used for RSS updates , I do all my own maintaince so I need only of GI RSS using a 3-year-old dimensions of dell with xp pro and its in tip top except for that shape it came only with a 80 GB hard drive and I've only used 20 concerts in 3 years that I use online for things important and backup storage I hope there is a solution for this because I installed ram to 4 GB and it has a 2.8 ghz Processor blazin fast and is in very good shape all help will be appreciated thanks

  Hello syncere99,

  1. What is the user account in the Task Scheduler are you for the work you are trying to use the Task Scheduler?

  The error code indicates that the user account that was used to create the job no longer exists. This could be because the user account is deleted. I suggest that you remove and re-create a job and check if you have the same problem.

  Thank you
  Irfan H, Engineer Support Microsoft Answers. Visit ourMicrosoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Run Security Scan after time of scheduled time.

  Obviously a scheduled scan Windows 7 MS Security Essentials can not work if the computer is off when the scheduled scan time occurs. BUT, it will perform the analysis when you start following up?

  Appears not to be the case - has put in place an analysis scheduled for Sunday 02:00, but last month it was last run. As I turned off my computer work at the end of the day and over the weekend, I would have thought that the scan would say "Oh Hey, I was supposed to be executed yesterday. I think I should run now, so that I can do my job. "But the last time he ran was when someone else was using my computer on a Saturday and didn't turn it off later.

  I had the 'start the scheduled scan when my PC is on but not used' checked - if that's not enough not to trigger a scan? Don't know how long he waits to determine that it is not "on duty". Or what processes would be considered "in use", I run a number of updates to database in the background, as well as things like e-mail or Facebook who are looking for new emails/messages every 5 minutes or more.

  Please notify/clarify. Thank you.

  Use means the user interacts with the keyboard and mouse.  Other programs 'used' or the race only account as the computer being in use.

• Microsoft Security Essentials will not run scheduled scan

  I haven't checked the boxes to run only when not using the computer or to limit the CPU usage.  In addition, the computer is turned on when the scheduled scan.  How to operate as it is set to run?

  I haven't checked the boxes to run only when not using the computer or to limit the CPU usage.  In addition, the computer is turned on when the scheduled scan.  How to operate as it is set to run?

  Check out these two links... they have a lot of useful info about this show
  http://www.SevenForums.com/system-security/211871-cannot-get-MSE-scheduled-scan-run.html

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/protect/Forum/MSE-protect_scanning/Microsoft-Security-Essentials-does-not-execute-a/0713c378-F972-4E30-bc0f-043aa04f714b

• Process scheduler: SR505 error process: security update - Acad Orgs

  People,

  Hello. I implement 9.0 Solution on a University Campus.

  I created academic organization tree to tree Manager. The tree is valid and verified. His tree ID is ACAD_ORGANIZATION.

  When I run Setup AWAR > Security > Secure Student Administration > process > update security - Acad Orgs, Process Status is ERROR.

  His SQR report .pdf file is not generated and the .out file contains the error message as below:

  Update security - Acad Org Table. TableSetID found for ACAD_ORGANIZATION tree when NO one expected.

  I checked the Manager of tree > tree > ACAD_ORGANIZATION > 'Structure' tab 'Field of additional key' control panel > "None" is selected and "SetId Indirection" is not selected.

  SetID field is not upward in its definition of the tree. There is no TableSetID, but the process SR505 .out file indicating "TableSetID is for ACAD_ORGANIZATION Tree when NONE expected.» I don't know what is causing the ERROR.

  My question is:

  Any folk can help solve the problem of this "Security - Table Acad Org update. "TableSetID find ACAD_ORGANIZATION tree when NO expected" while no TableSetID and no has been selected?

  Thanks in advance.

  People,

  Hello. The problem is solved by myself. ACAD_ORGANIZATION tree link with table of Acad Org security successfully today. Thank you.

• Why the microsoft security essentials does not it's the scheduled scan?

  I have a scan to run every Sunday at 02:00, but it never does.

  I have a scan to run every Sunday at 02:00, but it never does.

  See if this will fix the problem... (no guarantee)

  Open MSE > settings tab at the top > left column, sweeping planned > uncheck the box that says "Start scan of the calendar only when my pc is turned on but not used" > click on save changes.

  P.S. Make sure that real-time protection is enabled.

• can I run secure money from Kaspersky 2016 on Fire Fox

  10 showing orange attention, windows-based secure money off as an extension not signed. What should I do?

  42 of Firefox would not disable a due extension this extension is not signed. [Currently scheduled to be implemented in Firefox 45.]
  Firefox 39-plus provides a relative to the extension not be ' checked ' message and said to "act with caution". If it is not available or cannot be activated in the Addons Manager, or it does not, it may be not compatible for other reasons.

• I keep getting invited to add security exception. What was asked in Jan - no solution?

  cobraflex asked this question in January and I don't see where anyone did. I had this problem all year also - it's a REAL PAIN IN THE BUTT and I (like cobraflex) I'm looking for another customer. The only thing that keeps me is that my schedule is on tuberculosis.

  thread cobraflex describes the problem exactly. I use WinXP sp3, tuberculosis is up to date. My ISP is shaw.ca cable with a Cisco portal. My computer is a wired connection to a router (linksys) using DD - WRT. No other problems!

  Here's cobraflex "post...

  "im constantly wondered, sometimes several times per minute, to"confirm security exception". I always make sure that "permanently store this exception", before you click on "confirm security exception", but it doesn't seem to work, because a few minutes later I get exactly the same pop up once again, for all my email accounts.

  Ive been using thunderbird for years and usually in that case only, just once, after ive turned my anti-virus and turn it back on. But this time it started to happen on its own and has been tirelessly harassing me. Sometimes the pop up will appear while im in the middle of typing an email and cut me in my stride, so the program is almost impossible to use now.

  Do you know why this could happen? "

  Well, my 2nd pet irritate? It is absolutely amazing how people don't understand that the DATA is completely useless if it is not accompanied by a DATE! People NEVER delete data from their databases so that you can't tell if it's 6 months or 6 years!

  Not quite the case here - your last post was close enough so that when I called Shaw, we were able to sort it out.

  They specify no inbound security - defaults to what we have implemented under "outgoing server".

  Therefore, it seems more like this...

      Incoming Server: pop.shaw.ca
     Server Type: POP Mail Server (can't change this)
     Security Type: none
     Authentication: Normal Password (or  Password, transited insecurely)
     Port: 110
  

  Mail out with authentication server

  SMTP server

     Description: Shaw
     Server Name: mail.shaw.ca
     Connection Security: STARTTLS
     Port: 587
     Authentication: Normal Password
     Remote Access: We don't have access to this setting but worth
     checking maybe - S/B Enabled
  

  OH! AND you must make sure that his is the DEFAULT Server!

  It seems to work so far. I will return if it happens again (like keeping the full thread for others).

  Thanks for all your help - REALLY appreciate your persistence, now I can go back to being a happy user of Mozilla!

  Thanks again,

• Why is Zone Alarm security incompatible with Firefox 24.0?

  In the section of the addon of Firefox, there is a statement that says ZoneAlarm Security Engine 1.5.393.22 (turned off) by www.checkpoint.com

  Why? and does this mean that if I use the Firefox browser, I'm not protected on the internet?

  Hello cfox3dc, this is the work of a third-party developer of an addon that hangs in firefox to adapt or make an extension compatible with new versions. Mozilla has released new versions of the browser on a fixed schedule makes early alpha and beta versions available in the coming months, so this is certainly not come as a surprise to any third-party developer.

  more important still, the extension you mentioned will do little to increase your coverage on the web and your main antivirus and firewall process will simply continue to run fine without it: https://www.zonealarm.com/forums/showthread.php/79640-zonealarm-and-firefox?p=296953#post296953

  It is better to stay with the current versions of the browser that contains the security fixes for all kinds of questions: https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox.html

• Scan mode security 'sleep'

  I have the all access to McAfee security, which covers my Macbook Pro and my wife's PC.  I put it for an analysis scheduled once a week at 04:00, but my mac is in mode "Eve" at this time.  Is there a way to 'wake up' my computer during this time?  I'm running the Yosemite and will continue until all the bugs are worked on El Capitan.

   > System Preferences > energy saver

  go to the Planner

  Select

  

  However, in this case, the bugs are McAfee.

  Its garbage

  don't believe me read the forums

  don't believe the forumsask John McAfee (not at work and not in front of the children either)

  There is no reason to use this software on a mac, it is known to cause problems, it does not protect your Mac what anyone at the moment.

  iMHO, uninstall it and ask for your money back.

• Issue of non-secure/SSL in 14.0.1

  Looks like there may be a problem with FF 14.0.1 caching. If you visit any site safely... we will say "https://support.mozilla.org" and you close your browser and reopen and type 'http://support.mozilla.org' or 'support.mozilla.org', you get automatically meant the secure version of the site. This isn't a redirect on the side server, it seems that the browser is cached you once accessed the area firmly and now every time you visit what you want to do. No other browser I've tried behaves like that for all the Web sites that we operate. This creates problems in several areas of our sites because some areas were supposed to be consulted not securely. I understand that a well-designed site would be capable of supporting access via a protocol throughout each part of a Web site. However, we have many sites and many were scheduled long ago and just updated across all revisions, update each of them would be so much of your time.

  So my question is... are others perceiving this caching behavior? Is it planned? Is this a bug?

  Hi barth.shawn, you could use the redirection server displayed in the first link above, as appropriate.

• I've just updated to version 10 and want to downgrade to version 9. None of my security software is compatible with 10. Where can I download version 9. Version 3.6, which is available on the Web site, is more than I want to go. Thank you.

  See the question

  _nat_

  You're better off with almost nothing accept ZA and Kaspersky, both are absolutely the worst security editors to keep in touch with updates of Firefox this last year: everyone has had at least one add-on Firefox being several weeks or months of delay on the schedule of release of Firefox. It's almost as if they don't know week 18 of Firefox development process and they are waiting until their Firefox users complain of their shit doesn't work don't not with a version new version of Firefox, before even to think to do their updates. IMO, the smartest thing is to test the version of channel every night (first alpha stage 6 weeks) for compatibility issues once a week to see what problems may exist with their software, and once the new version hits the channel Aurora (2nd week alpha stage 6) begin to develop a plan calendar for what they should be fixed and begin to repair their stuff, while intensifying to test a little. Once the new version Beta 6 weeks channel hits they should be completed their corrections and expand their tests to include the combination of the Add - most popular add-ons used by Firefox users so that they can see all problem users could hit and fix what needs to be fixed before the release of the new version of Firefox.

  Another thing these security vendors could do is some clients do their beta testing to find flaws and weak spots in their substance, as organizations open source like Mozilla done with Firefox. While I'm not a professional software, I have 3 different versions installed Nightly that I 'test' a little almost every day for simple things and the Aurora version, as well as the beta version. The last 6 or 7 years old, I found 3 or 4 pretty serious flaws that I have filed bug reports, of which one resulted in developers providing a warning much sterner on the risk of data loss and the other Bug reports helped developers by making them aware of a potential problem early enough in development that is was difficult to avoid the issue I pointed out to them with some minor coding changes.

  Free or paid version, if these security companies will create and distribute a Firefox Add-on is the right thing to do to keep to date with Firefox, or they should just interrupt the add-on and we stop around jerks with their irresponsibility and their nonchalant attitude towards Firefox. Honestly, I miss the "good old days" when these security companies ignored Firefox and only support Internet Explorer.

  I use Avira Personal Free - http://www.free-av.com/ - who does not feel the need to develop Add-ons for Firefox which really don't add anything to Firefox and only provide a 'bells and whistles' version of something that is already integrated into Firefox. Good solid anti-virus protection that is updated twice a day.